The Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, added in the five years after the Civil War, are sometimes called the "Reconstruction Amendments."
The Reconstruction Amendments were a set of constitutional amendments enacted in the aftermath of the American Civil War. The Thirteenth Amendment, ratified in 1865, abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime. The Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, granted equal protection under the law to all citizens, including former slaves, and guaranteed due process of law. The Fifteenth Amendment, ratified in 1870, prohibited the denial of voting rights based on race, color, or previous condition of servitude. Collectively, these amendments aimed to address the issues of slavery, civil rights, and voting rights during the period of Reconstruction in the United States.
Learn more about Reconstruction Amendments here: brainly.com/question/901229
#SPJ11
5
Analyzing Word Choice: Mastery Test
Select the correct texts in the passage.
Which two phrases contribute to the accusatory tone of the excerpt?
excerpt from the Declaration of Independence
by Thomas Jefferson
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed with certain fundamental rights, that among these are
life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. That to secure these rights, governments are instituted among men, deriving their just powers from the
consent of the governed. That whenever any form of government becomes destructive, it is the right of the people to alter or to abolish it.
In every stage of these oppressions we have petitioned for redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated petitions have been answered only by
repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act, which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. We have
warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. They have been deaf to the voice of
justice and of brotherhood.
Undo
Next
The two phrases that contribute to the accusatory tone of the excerpt are:
"Our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury."
This phrase implies that the government has repeatedly ignored or dismissed the requests for redress, resulting in harm or mistreatment to the people. It conveys a sense of frustration and accusation.
"A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act, which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people."
This phrase directly accuses the Prince (referring to King George III of Britain) of having the qualities and actions that define a tyrant. It implies that the ruler is unfit to govern a free people and holds a critical and accusatory tone.
These phrases highlight the grievances and frustrations of the writer (Thomas Jefferson) and contribute to the accusatory tone of the excerpt.
Learn more about accusatory tone here:
https://brainly.com/question/18682476
#SPJ1
native americans have never become u.s. citizens under american constitutional law. b. native americans became u.s. citizens in 1868. c. native americans became u.s. citizens in 1924. d. native americans have always been recognized as citizens of the united states.
Answer:
d. native americans have always been recognized as citizens of the united states. since they were here firts
Explanation:
PLS HELP I NEED THIS NOW!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I'M BEGGING YOU, HELP ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
describe the rise of the internal slave trade in medieval africa
The U.S. joined an international effort in 1994 that sustained an uneasy peace in which country?
A. Cuba
B. the Dominican Republic
C. Grenada
D. Haiti
The U.S. entered an international effort in 1994 that kept an fragile peace in Haiti. For that reason, the correct option is D.
Haiti (option D) was facing a political crisis due to violence and poverty that had plagued the country for years. The crisis had reached a peak with the military overthrow of the democratically elected President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in 1991.
This led to an international embargo on Haiti that devastated its economy and increased the suffering of its people. In 1994, after years of political pressure, the U.S. led a multinational force to restore Aristide to power and end the violence.
This effort, known as Operation Uphold Democracy, helped to stabilize the country and bring peace to its people. However, the peace was uneasy and Haiti continued to face many challenges, including poverty and political instability.
Despite these challenges, the U.S. and other countries continue to demand that Haiti adapt and work towards a better future.
Learn more about Haiti: https://brainly.com/question/32135726
#SPJ11
John Maynard Keynes and Karl Marx would disagree most about the answer t owhich question?
John Maynard Keynes and Karl Marx would disagree most about the answer to question A: Should governments take total control over economies?
What is Karl Marx's belief?Karl Marx believed in a socialist system where the government had full control over the economy and the means of production, and the ultimate goal was a classless society.
John Maynard Keynes, on the other hand, believed in a capitalist system where the government intervened in the economy to stabilize it and mitigate the negative effects of recessions and economic crises. However, Keynes did not advocate total state control of the economy.
Keynes and Marx may also disagree about questions B, C, and D, but they are not as fundamental to economic theory as the role of government in the economy.
learn more about Karl Marx: https://brainly.com/question/1092276
#SPJ1
Which of the following best states how Shays’s Rebellion and the Pennsylvania Mutiny affected Congress?
Congress feared the spread of future rebellions and anarchy.
Congress feared the spread of slavery to Western territories.
Congress feared the rejection of the union by states.
Congress feared the creation of new, rebellious states.
The best statement that describes how Shays's Rebellion and the Pennsylvania Mutiny affected Congress is A. Congress feared the spread of future rebellions and anarchy.
What did Shay's Rebellion lead to ?Shays's Rebellion was a tumultuous insurrection in western Massachusetts from 1786 to1787, spearheaded by aggrieved farmers disgruntled by oppressive taxes and unjust economic disparities. Similarly, the Pennsylvania Mutiny of 1783 brought about unrest when an assemblage of Continental Army personnel rebelled over unpaid recompenses.
Consequently, these episodes induced major apprehensions among Congress members concerning future rebellions, along with the apprehension that the nation was too powerless to establish order and avoid additional uprisings. Essentially, it seemed that the civil authority possessed inadequate potency foreseeable revolt prevention.
Find out more on Shay's Rebellion at https://brainly.com/question/24848934
#SPJ1
which state did not remain in the union? multiple choice missouri delaware maryland arkansas kentucky
Arkansas did not remain in the Union.
During the American Civil War (1861-1865), eleven southern states seceded from the United States to form the Confederate States of America. The states that seceded were South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina.
The remaining states, including Missouri, Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and others, remained in the Union. However, Arkansas did secede from the Union and joined the Confederacy on May 6, 1861. The state was readmitted to the Union in 1868 after the end of the Civil War.
To know more about Arkansas , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/28013606
#SPJ4
horatio greenough believed that american buildings should be designed like: group of answer choices gothic cathedrals classical temples ships factories
Horatio Greenough believed that american buildings should be designed like gothic cathedrals, classical temples, and ships.
The correct option is D.
Horatio Greenough believed that American buildings should be designed in a manner that reflects the culture and values of the United States.
He thought that the buildings should be designed in a way that would reflect the grandeur and majesty of the country, as well as its democratic ideals. To achieve this, he proposed that American buildings should be designed like gothic cathedrals, classical temples, and ships. He thought that these designs would allude to the power, authority, and nobility of America, while also conveying the ideals of democracy and equality.
He argued that the use of these designs would help the United States to develop a unique architectural style of its own, distinct from that of Europe. He believed that the use of these designs would help to create a sense of national identity and pride in the country.
To know more about Horatio Greenough, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/1358304
#SPJ4
The Question -
Horatio greenough believed that american buildings should be designed like:
group of answer choices
A) gothic cathedrals
B) classical temples
C) ships factories
D) All of the above
one argument for and one argument against egalitarian policies from a utilitarian framework where policies should be based on achieving the greatest happiness for the greatest number
Argument For:
Egalitarian policies aim to reduce income inequality and promote equal opportunities for all individuals. From a utilitarian perspective, this could lead to greater overall happiness for the majority of people. When resources and opportunities are more evenly distributed, more people can fulfill their basic needs, enjoy a higher standard of living, and experience a sense of fairness in society. This increased well-being for the many can result in the greatest happiness for the greatest number, which aligns with the utilitarian principle.
Argument Against:
On the other hand, some argue that egalitarian policies may have negative consequences that outweigh the benefits, making them inconsistent with the utilitarian framework. Implementing these policies could involve higher taxes or redistributive measures, which may discourage entrepreneurship, innovation, and hard work, as people may perceive fewer incentives to excel. This, in turn, could lead to slower economic growth and potentially reduce the overall happiness of the population. In this scenario, utilitarians might argue that the greatest happiness for the greatest number would be better achieved by focusing on policies that promote economic growth, rather than strict income equality.
Learn more about egalitarian here : brainly.com/question/29698776
#SPJ11
Need the answer now and asap
Use specific examples from the history you have learned to compose a well-developed paragraph on the following:
Describe the goals of reform movements of the 19th and early 20th centuries and explain their effects on one of the following regions: Africa, Asia, Europe, the United States, the Caribbean, or Latin America.
Answer:
The reform movements of the 19th and early 20th centuries aimed to address various social, political, and economic issues prevalent in different regions around the world.
Explanation:
These movements emerged as responses to the challenges posed by industrialization, imperialism, inequality, and other factors. Let's examine the goals of reform movements in Europe and their effects on the region.
In Europe during this period, several reform movements emerged with the objective of addressing social, political, and economic injustices and improving the conditions of different societal groups. These movements included labor rights, women's suffrage, education reform, and social welfare reforms.
The labor rights movement aimed to secure better working conditions, fair wages, and improved rights for workers. Workers in Europe faced long working hours, low pay, and hazardous conditions due to the industrial revolution. Reformers, including trade unions and socialist thinkers, advocated for labor rights, leading to the establishment of worker protection laws, the right to organize and strike, and the formation of social democratic parties in several European countries. These reforms helped improve the lives of workers, reduced exploitation, and laid the foundation for modern labor laws and regulations.
The women's suffrage movement fought for equal political rights for women. Activists across Europe campaigned for the right to vote, access to education, property rights, and increased participation in public life. The suffrage movement gained momentum during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, and by the early 20th century, several European countries, including Finland, Norway, and the United Kingdom, granted women the right to vote. These reforms marked a significant step towards gender equality and paved the way for broader women's rights movements in subsequent decades.
Education reform movements aimed to expand access to education and improve the quality of schooling. Prominent educational reformers, such as Friedrich Froebel and Maria Montessori, advocated for child-centered education and the importance of early childhood development. Governments in Europe began investing in public education, establishing compulsory schooling, and expanding educational opportunities for children from various social backgrounds. These reforms helped increase literacy rates, improve educational standards, and contribute to the social mobility of individuals.
Social welfare reforms emerged as a response to the growing concerns over poverty, inequality, and inadequate social support systems. Influenced by the ideas of social reformers like Beatrice Webb and Otto von Bismarck, European countries began implementing welfare policies to alleviate poverty and provide support for the vulnerable sections of society. This led to the establishment of social insurance programs, minimum wage laws, healthcare systems, and social assistance programs. These reforms aimed to reduce inequality, ensure a basic standard of living, and promote social solidarity.
The effects of these reform movements on Europe were profound. They contributed to the improvement of working conditions, the expansion of political rights, increased access to education, and the development of social safety nets. These reforms helped to mitigate the worst effects of industrialization and inequality, leading to more equitable societies and improved living standards for many people in Europe. They also set important precedents and inspired similar movements and reforms in other regions of the world, contributing to the global advancement of social and political rights.
what is the term for the group called for jury duty from which jury panels are selected?
The term for the group called for jury duty from which jury panels are selected is the "jury pool" or "venire."
The jury pool consists of a larger group of individuals who are summoned for jury duty based on specific criteria set by the court. These criteria typically include age, citizenship, residency, and other qualifications required by the jurisdiction. The purpose of the jury pool is to ensure a diverse and representative selection of potential jurors for a particular trial.
From the jury pool, a smaller group known as the jury panel is selected through a process called voir dire. Voir dire involves questioning potential jurors to determine their suitability for serving on a particular case. The jury panel is then chosen based on the responses provided during voir dire, and they ultimately decide the outcome of the trial based on the evidence and arguments presented to them.
To learn more about jurisdiction click here:
brainly.com/question/14179714
#SPJ11
evaluate the relative importance for internal migration within the united states in the period from 1900 to 1970
Internal migration within the United States was a significant and complex process that had a profound impact on the country's economy, culture, and society.
The relative importance of internal migration within the United States in the period from 1900 to 1970 can be evaluated by considering several factors, including:
The number of people who moved: Internal migration within the United States increased significantly during this period, with millions of people moving from rural areas to urban centers in search of work and economic opportunities.
The reasons for migration: Migration during this period was driven by a variety of factors, including the growth of industrial cities, the expansion of the railroad and highway networks, and the development of new industries in the West and South.
The impact on the economy: Internal migration had a significant impact on the economy, as it helped to fuel the growth of cities and the development of new industries.
Learn more about Internal migration visit: brainly.com/question/30407735
#SPJ4
What did the Supreme Court rule in McCulloch v. Maryland?
A. The federal government had powers beyond what were stated in the Constitution.
B. States had the right to nullify national laws with which they disagreed.
C. Both the federal government and state governments had taxing authority.
D. Powers not granted to the national government were reserved for the states.
In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government had powers beyond what were explicitly stated in the Constitution. Option A
This decision established the concept of implied powers, which allows Congress to pass laws necessary for carrying out its express powers. The case arose when the state of Maryland attempted to tax the Bank of the United States, a federal institution.
Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for the majority, held that states could not tax the federal government because it would interfere with the government's ability to carry out its duties.
Marshall further stated that the federal government had the authority to create a national bank, even though the Constitution did not specifically grant this power. This decision was a significant victory for the federal government and established the supremacy of federal law over state law.
The ruling also upheld the idea that the federal government had the power to establish institutions and programs necessary for the well-being of the nation.
Overall, the McCulloch v. Maryland decision helped to strengthen the power of the federal government and played an essential role in shaping the relationship between the federal government and the states. So Option A is correct.
For more question on government visit:
https://brainly.com/question/1772602
#SPJ11
martin van burens long and mostly successful carrer in policits may be attiributed in large part to his being
Martin Van Buren's long and mostly successful career in politics may be attributed in large part to his being a skilled and strategic political operator.
Van Buren's ability to navigate the complex political landscape of his time, build alliances, and master the art of party politics played a significant role in his success.
Van Buren's rise to prominence can be attributed to his astute understanding of political dynamics. He was a skilled organizer and played a crucial role in building the Democratic-Republican Party, which later became the Democratic Party. Van Buren served as a U.S. senator, governor of New York, secretary of state, and vice president before eventually becoming the eighth president of the United States.
One of Van Buren's key strengths was his ability to form and maintain political alliances. He was adept at forging connections with influential politicians and building support networks, which helped him navigate the ever-changing political landscape. Van Buren's organizational skills and political acumen were evident in his role as a key strategist behind Andrew Jackson's successful presidential campaign. He utilized his expertise to establish a strong party infrastructure and mobilize grassroots support.
Furthermore, Van Buren's pragmatic approach to politics contributed to his success. He was known for his ability to find common ground and compromise when necessary, making him a skilled negotiator. This allowed him to navigate contentious issues such as the divisive debate over slavery. Van Buren's political agility and willingness to adapt to changing circumstances helped him maintain a successful career in politics for a considerable period.
In summary, Martin Van Buren's long and mostly successful career in politics can be attributed to his strategic political maneuvering, ability to form alliances, and pragmatic approach to governance. His organizational skills, political acumen, and talent for building support networks played crucial roles in his rise to power and sustained influence in American politics.
to learn more about Martin Van Buren' click here; brainly.com/question/31838305
#SPJ11
why does odysseus takes so long to tell the phaeacians his name?
In Homer's epic poem, "The Odyssey," Odysseus takes a long time to reveal his true identity to the Phaeacians for strategic reasons. After a decade-long war in Troy and a lengthy, arduous journey back home, Odysseus has faced numerous trials and dangers.
When Odysseus arrives in the land of the Phaeacians, he initially conceals his true name and introduces himself as a shipwrecked traveler named "Nobody." This pseudonym serves as a clever disguise and a way to protect himself from potential enemies or adversaries.
Odysseus has experienced firsthand the treachery and hostility of various individuals and creatures throughout his journey. By keeping his identity hidden, he can assess the character and intentions of those around him before deciding to trust them.
Odysseus wants to ensure that the Phaeacians are friendly and hospitable before revealing his true name, as this knowledge could potentially put him at risk.
To learn more about Homer's.
Click here:brainly.com/question/29331716
#SPJ11
juliet and her mother seem to be very different women. what evidence does shakespeare provide to show this?
Shakespeare provides evidence of the differences between Juliet and her mother through their contrasting attitudes towards love, marriage, and their relationship with Romeo.
In Shakespeare's play "Romeo and Juliet," he portrays Juliet and her mother as contrasting characters with distinct personalities and perspectives. Firstly, their differing attitudes towards love and marriage highlight their dissimilarities. Juliet is portrayed as a romantic idealist who falls deeply in love with Romeo and is willing to defy societal expectations and risk everything for their love. In contrast, her mother, Lady Capulet, approaches marriage as a practical matter guided by social status and wealth, showing little consideration for personal feelings or desires.
Furthermore, the mother-daughter relationship between Juliet and Lady Capulet reveals their contrasting personalities. Lady Capulet is depicted as distant and unsupportive, displaying a lack of emotional connection and understanding towards Juliet's desires and aspirations. Their interactions are often formal and strained, with Lady Capulet primarily concerned with Juliet's obedience and conformity to societal norms. On the other hand, Juliet is portrayed as a passionate and independent young woman who seeks genuine love and autonomy, leading to a growing divide between her and her mother. Lastly, the way both characters relate to Romeo underscores their differences. Juliet sees Romeo as her true love and equal, sharing a deep emotional bond with him. In contrast, Lady Capulet views Romeo as an insignificant suitor and urges Juliet to consider a more advantageous marriage. This disparity in their perceptions of Romeo further highlights their contrasting perspectives on love, romance, and individual choice.
Overall, Shakespeare uses these elements to illustrate the stark differences between Juliet and her mother. Juliet represents youth, idealism, and the pursuit of personal happiness, while Lady Capulet embodies traditional values, social expectations, and the prioritization of societal status. Their contrasting views and attitudes contribute to the conflict and tragedy that unfolds in the play.
Learn more about Shakespeare : brainly.com/question/25603233
#SPJ11
As a result of the War of 1812, many American Indian groups
made alliances with settlers.
lost their land to settlers.
continued to fight settlers.
worked together with settlers.
Answer:
yes they traded food through rivers
Explanation:
What are the greatest challenges facing the United States in the 21st century?
Answer:
Explanation:
There are many challenges facing the United States in the 21st century, some of the most significant of which include:
Economic inequality: The gap between rich and poor in the US has been growing, leading to a range of negative social and economic consequences.
Climate change: The US is one of the world's largest emitters of greenhouse gases, and rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and other climate-related impacts are affecting communities across the country.
Political polarization: The country is deeply divided along political lines, with many Americans feeling alienated from one another and from their government.
Health care: Despite being one of the wealthiest nations in the world, the US has some of the highest health care costs and worst health outcomes among developed countries.
Racial and social justice: The country continues to grapple with systemic racism, discrimination, and inequality, with significant disparities in wealth, health, education, and other areas.
Cybersecurity: As the world becomes increasingly connected and reliant on technology, the US faces a range of threats to its national security and economic stability from cyberattacks.
Globalization: The US is part of an interconnected global economy, and must navigate the challenges and opportunities of globalization while protecting the interests of its citizens.
These challenges are complex and interconnected and will require innovative and collaborative solutions to address.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
Why did John Bidwell decide to leave Missouri? A trapper made California sound like paradise. He could not find a job in Missouri. The traders in Platte County forced him out. None of these choices are correct.
John Bidwell decided to leave Missouri because a trapper had described California as a paradise. So, the correct choice is ''A trapper made California sound like paradise''.
John Bidwell's decision to leave Missouri was primarily influenced by the enticing description of California provided by a trapper. Bidwell, like many other individuals of the time, was drawn to the prospect of finding an idyllic land abundant in natural resources and opportunities for wealth and success.
During the mid-19th century, trappers and explorers ventured into the vast western territories, sharing tales of the bountiful resources and fertile lands of California. These accounts captivated the imagination of Bidwell and others seeking new beginnings. The promise of a better life, with plentiful game, fertile soil, and potential riches, motivated Bidwell to venture westward.
While it is possible that Bidwell may have encountered challenges in finding employment in Missouri, it was the alluring image of California as a veritable paradise that proved to be the decisive factor behind his departure. The prospect of a land teeming with natural abundance and opportunities for personal and economic growth was a compelling lure for pioneers like Bidwell, prompting them to undertake arduous journeys across the vast and treacherous American frontier in pursuit of a brighter future.
For more questions on Missouri
https://brainly.com/question/3394354
#SPJ8
True or False: the longmen caves in china, a buddhist pilgrimage destination composed of a complex of cave shrines, were supported by imperial patronage.
True. The Longmen Caves in China, also known as the Longmen Grottoes, were indeed supported by imperial patronage.
These caves, located near the city of Luoyang in Henan Province, were constructed primarily between the 5th and 8th centuries during the Northern Wei and Tang dynasties.
The caves consist of a complex of cave shrines carved into limestone cliffs, housing thousands of statues of Buddha, bodhisattvas, and other Buddhist figures. They were created as a place of worship and veneration and were sponsored by emperors and other members of the imperial court, as well as wealthy individuals and Buddhist monks.
The patronage of the imperial court played a significant role in the creation and development of the Longmen Caves, providing the financial resources, political support, and artistic talent necessary for their construction. The caves are considered one of the finest examples of Chinese Buddhist art and are recognized as a UNESCO World Heritage site.
To learn more about Longmen Grottoes.
Click here:brainly.com/question/30312130
#SPJ11
what did the groups that led the 1848 revolutions in europe have in common?
The groups that led the 1848 revolutions in Europe shared common goals and grievances against the existing political and social order. They were driven by desires for political liberalization, national unity, and social reforms.
The groups leading the 1848 revolutions in Europe, often referred to as liberals, shared a common desire for political change and greater civil liberties. They aimed to establish constitutional monarchies or democratic republics, seeking to replace absolute or autocratic rule with more representative systems of government.
Additionally, these groups advocated for national unity and self-determination, aiming to unite fragmented regions and ethnic groups under a shared national identity. They also sought social reforms, including improvements in working conditions, labor rights, and the alleviation of socioeconomic inequalities. The revolutions of 1848 were driven by these shared goals and grievances, although their outcomes varied across different countries and regions.
To learn more about social reforms click here :
brainly.com/question/3332629
#SPJ11
The___is also the president of the senate but he may only vote in the case of a tie.
Answer:
"The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided" (U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 3). Since 1789, 297 tie-breaking votes have been cast.
Explanation:
domesticated by the fourth century c.e., why did the camel become the major source of transport in the saharan region?
The camel was domesticated by the fourth century C.E. in the Arabian Peninsula and quickly became the major source of transport in the Saharan region. This was due to the camel's unique adaptations to desert environments, such as its ability to store water and withstand extreme temperatures.
Additionally, the camel was able to travel long distances without requiring large amounts of food or water, making it an ideal mode of transportation for trading caravans across the Sahara. The use of camels also allowed for increased trade and cultural exchange between the Saharan region and other parts of Africa and the Middle East.
Overall, the camel's ability to survive in harsh desert conditions and its efficient use as a mode of transportation made it the natural choice for trade and travel in the Saharan region.
Know more about the Arabian Peninsula here:
https://brainly.com/question/12168570
#SPJ11
Directions: Use this chart and your knowledge of social studies to answer the question.
Reconstruction
Heading:
Heading:
· broad amnesty for most former
Confederates · imposed military rule on southern states
· southern states could organize new governments and elect representatives to Congress · threw out governments of all southern states that had refused to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment
Which of the following headings completes the left column of the chart?
A. Fifty percent of a state’s voters had to swear an oath of loyalty to the United States and the Constitution.
B. Only people who paid a poll tax would be allowed to vote.
C. Confederate leaders were to be imprisoned.
D. Southern states had to abolish slavery and ratify the Thirteenth Amendment.
The process of Reconstruction was complex and challenging, and it took many years for the southern states to fully recover from the devastation of the Civil War. Option D
The heading that completes the left column of the chart is "imposed military rule on southern states." This is because during Reconstruction, the federal government placed the southern states under military control in order to enforce the new laws and ensure that the Confederates did not regain power.
This military rule was imposed in response to the refusal of some southern states to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment, which granted citizenship and equal protection under the law to all persons born or naturalized in the United States.
The military governors appointed by the federal government were tasked with overseeing the reconstruction process and ensuring that the southern states complied with the new laws and amendments.
One of the key challenges of Reconstruction was how to ensure that the southern states would comply with these new laws and amendments. Some southern states were initially resistant to these changes, and there were fears that the Confederates would regain power and reverse the gains of the Civil War.
The federal government therefore imposed military rule on these states in order to ensure that the new laws and amendments were enforced and that the Confederates were kept in check.
However, the policies and laws enacted during this period laid the foundation for a more just and equitable society, and helped to move the United States towards a more inclusive and democratic future. So Option D is correct
For more questions on Reconstruction visit:
https://brainly.com/question/13753522
#SPJ11
between 1856 and 1860 the sectional quarrel: a. became virtually irreconcilable. b. ceased to be a serious problem. c. was moderated by national political figures. d. remained primarily an economic problem.
It is clear that during this period, the sectional quarrel between the North and the South became virtually irreconcilable and was not moderated by national political figures. While economic issues were certainly a factor in the conflict, the underlying cause was the deep-seated disagreement over slavery and its place in American society.
Between 1856 and 1860, the sectional quarrel between the North and the South of the United States became virtually irreconcilable. The issue of slavery had been a source of tension for many years, but it reached a boiling point during this period. The election of 1856 highlighted the deep divisions between the two regions, with the Republican Party running on an anti-slavery platform that angered Southern Democrats.
The following years saw a series of events that further escalated the conflict, including the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision, which declared that slaves could not be considered citizens and therefore had no right to sue for their freedom. The 1859 raid on Harper's Ferry by abolitionist John Brown also intensified tensions, with many Southerners viewing it as evidence of a widespread Northern conspiracy to incite slave rebellions.
While some national political figures, such as President James Buchanan, attempted to moderate the conflict by calling for compromise and conciliation, their efforts were largely unsuccessful. The election of 1860, in which Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected without receiving a single vote from the South, marked the final break between the two regions and led to the secession of Southern states.
Learn more about national political figures here:-
https://brainly.com/question/15093090
#SPJ11
In what ways did self-serving individuals hurt the Reconstruction effort?
A) They insisted on having their own way.
B) They refused to compromise on key points.
C) They misused government tax dollars.
D) They accepted bribes and overspent money.
Self-serving individuals undermined the Reconstruction effort in several ways. They insisted on having their own way, refused to compromise on key points, misused government tax dollars, and accepted bribes while overspending money.
These actions hindered the progress of Reconstruction and impeded the goal of rebuilding the post-Civil War South. Self-serving individuals played a detrimental role in the Reconstruction effort following the American Civil War. Firstly, they insisted on having their own way, prioritizing their personal interests over the greater objective of rebuilding the war-torn South. This attitude led to conflicts and disagreements, hindering the cooperation necessary for successful Reconstruction.
Secondly, self-serving individuals refused to compromise on key points. Instead of finding common ground and seeking solutions that would benefit the entire nation, they remained steadfast in their positions, causing political gridlock and preventing meaningful progress. Additionally, some individuals misused government tax dollars during Reconstruction. Instead of utilizing funds for their intended purpose of rebuilding infrastructure, improving education, and aiding the formerly enslaved population, corrupt officials and opportunists diverted funds for personal gain. This misuse of public funds further hindered the overall success of Reconstruction.
Furthermore, self-serving individuals engaged in bribery and overspent money. Accepting bribes compromised the integrity of government officials and undermined the trust of the public. Overspending money on unnecessary projects or personal luxuries diverted resources from the crucial task of rebuilding the South and assisting those affected by the war.
Learn more about Self-serving here: brainly.com/question/30760175
#SPJ11
harriet taylor, in 1851, published the enfranchisement of women, which included arguments for women to receive all of the following except: a. equal rights b. education c. suffrage and civic participation d. employment
Harriet Taylor, in 1851, published "The Enfranchisement of Women," which included arguments for women to receive equal rights, education, suffrage and civic participation, but did not explicitly argue for women's employment. The correct option is D.
Harriet Taylor was a philosopher and women's rights advocate who co-authored several works with her husband, John Stuart Mill. "The Enfranchisement of Women" was one of her most important contributions to the women's rights movement. The essay argued for women's equality in various spheres of life, including education, politics, and the workplace.
Taylor believed that women's exclusion from these areas was a form of oppression and that granting women equal rights would benefit society as a whole. In the essay, Taylor argued that women should have the right to vote and participate in civic affairs, which would give them greater political power and influence.
The correct option is D.
To know more about Harriet Taylor, click here.
https://brainly.com/question/2515982
#SPJ4
ACES model. Each of the questions should be at least 1 paragraph.
Question 1: Compare and Contrast (Similarities and Differences) the actions and beliefs of Dr. King to Cesar
Chavez/Dolores Huerta.
Question 2: Compare and Contrast (Similarities and Differences) the actions and beliefs of Dr. King to Malcolm X.
Question 3: Compare and Contrast (Similarities and Differences) the actions and beliefs of Dr. King to the Black Panther Party.
The Similarities and Differences between Cesar Chavez/Dolores Huerta leaders are discussed as
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Cesar Chavez were civil rights leaders, yet their actions and views were very different. Dr. King pushed for nonviolent protest, whereas Chavez emphasized labor strikes and boycotts.
Malcolm X was a notable civil rights leader who pushed for self-defense and black nationalism, but the Black Panther Party was known for armed neighborhood patrols and calls for socialist revolution.
Dr. King, Chavez, Malcolm X, and the Black Panther Party were all civil rights activists, but their acts and ideas were very different.
Learn more about Cesar Chavez, here:
https://brainly.com/question/27534117
#SPJ1
according to the text, what is the age when formal school instruction begins in many cultures?
In many cultures, formal school instruction typically begins around the age of six or seven.
At this age, children are considered to have reached a level of cognitive and social development that allows them to engage in structured learning activities. Formal schooling provides a systematic and organized approach to education, focusing on academic subjects such as reading, writing, mathematics, and science. It also helps children develop important social skills, such as interacting with peers and following instructions from teachers.
The age of six or seven is generally chosen as the starting point for formal schooling for several reasons. Firstly, it aligns with the stage of development when children have acquired basic language skills and are ready to learn more complex concepts. At this age, children have developed the necessary attention span and cognitive abilities to engage in formal instruction.
Secondly, beginning formal schooling at a consistent age allows for efficient organization and planning of educational systems. It also provides a standardized framework for curriculum development and assessment. Lastly, starting school at a relatively uniform age facilitates socialization and peer interactions, as children enter the educational system together and can form friendships and learn together.
Overall, the age of six or seven is a common starting point for formal school instruction in many cultures, providing children with structured learning environments and opportunities for academic and social development.
To learn more about social development click here: brainly.com/question/30756287
#SPJ11
supporters of the slaveocracy attempted to determine the new kansas government in order to maintain control in the u. s. congress.
Supporters of the slaveocracy attempted to determine the new Kansas government in order to maintain control in the U.S. Congress.
They hoped to make Kansas a slave state, which would tip the balance of power in Congress in favor of slave-owning states. This led to a violent conflict in Kansas known as "Bleeding Kansas" and highlighted the deep divide between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces in the United States.
In the 1850s, the issue of slavery was a major political and social issue in the United States. Supporters of the slaveocracy, particularly in the South, feared that the growing anti-slavery movement would lead to the abolition of slavery and the loss of their economic and political power. In an attempt to maintain control in Congress, they attempted to determine the new Kansas government and make it a slave state, despite the fact that the majority of settlers in Kansas were anti-slavery.
This led to a violent conflict in Kansas known as "Bleeding Kansas" as pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces fought for control. The conflict highlighted the deep divide between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces in the United States and contributed to the growing tensions that would eventually lead to the Civil War. Despite their efforts, Kansas eventually entered the Union as a free state, and the balance of power in Congress shifted in favor of free states.
Learn more about slaveocracy here: brainly.com/question/17432274
#SPJ11