The town plaza in a certain town is a The town plaza in a certain town is a parallelogram. The town's planning committee has decided to build a fountain at the center of the plaza. This sketch shows the corner points when placed on a coordinate grid. A = (0, 4); B = (6, 1); C = (4, -3); D = (-2, 0) Which coordinates show where the fountain will be located?parallelogram. The town's planning committee has decided to build a fountain at the center of the plaza. This sketch shows the corner points when placed on a coordinate grid. A = (0, 4); B = (6, 1); C = (4, -3); D = (-2, 0) Which coordinates show where the fountain will be located?

(a) The selling price is $6.25.

(b)  The net profit is the difference between the selling price and the cost is $4.35.

(c)  The cost is $1.90.

We have,

Let's denote the cost of producing one bag of corn chips as "C", the selling price as "S", and the net profit as "P".

We can then use the given information to set up the following equations:

Overhead percent = 20% of the selling price

=> 0.2S = $1.25

Markup = Selling price - Cost

=> $4.35 = S - C

We can solve these two equations simultaneously to find the values of S and C:

0.2S = $1.25

=> S = $6.25 (dividing both sides by 0.2)

$4.35 = S - C

=> $4.35 = $6.25 - C (substituting the value of S)

=> C = $1.90 (subtracting $4.35 from both sides)

(a)

The selling price is $6.25.

(b)

The net profit is the difference between the selling price and the cost:

P = S - C

= $6.25 - $1.90

= $4.35.

(c)

The cost is $1.90.

Thus,

(a) The selling price is $6.25.

(b)  The net profit is the difference between the selling price and the cost is $4.35.

(c)  The cost is $1.90.

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ1

To find the length of the curve described by the parametric equations, we use the formula. Therefore, the exact length of the curve described by the parametric equations is 16√17 - 2/3 units.

L = ∫[a, b] sqrt[(dx/dt)^2 + ( dy/dt)^2] dt

where a and b are the bounds of the parameter t.

Using the given parametric equations, we have:

x(t) = 8 + 3t^2

y(t) = 7 + 2t^3

Taking the derivatives with respect to t, we have:

dx/dt = 6t

dy/dt = 6t^2

Substituting these expressions into the formula for L, we get:

L = ∫[0,4] sqrt[(6t)^2 + (6t^2)^2] dt

= ∫[0,4] sqrt[36t^2 + 36t^4] dt

= ∫[0,4] 6t sqrt(1 + t^2) dt

To evaluate this integral, we use the substitution u = 1 + t^2, du/dt = 2t, and dt = du/2t. This gives:

L = ∫[1,17] 3 sqrt(u) du

= 2[u^(3/2)/3]∣[1,17]

= 2[(17^(3/2) - 1^(3/2))/3]

= 2(8√17 - 1/3)

Therefore, the exact length of the curve described by the parametric equations is 16√17 - 2/3 units.

Visit here to learn more parametric equations:

brainly.com/question/28537985

#SPJ11

The distance between the poles is 100.38 ft.

Let's the distance between the poles as "d".

According to the Law of Cosines,

d² = (74.8)² + (66.7) - 2 × 74.8 × 66.7 × cos(103.6°)

d² = 5580.64 + 4458.89 - 2 × 74.8 × 66.7 × cos(103.6°)

d² = 10039.53 - 10039.38 × cos(103.6°)

d ≈ 10039.53 - (-36.57)

d² ≈ 10076.10

Taking the square root of both sides:

d ≈ 100.38 ft

Therefore, the distance between the poles is 100.38 ft.

Learn more about Law of cosine here:

https://brainly.com/question/30766161

#SPJ1

If mean of "non-conforming" units is 1.6, then probability that sample will contain 2 or less "non-conforming" units using Poisson-distribution is 0.7833.

The Average(mean) of non-conforming units is = 1.6,

So, the probability function using, poisson-distribution is written as :

P(X) = ([tex]e^{-1.6}[/tex]×1.6ˣ)/x!,   for x=0,1,2,3,...

We have to find probability that sample will contain 2 or less nonconforming units, which means P(X≤2),

So, P(X≤2) = P(X=0) + P(X=1) +P(X=2),

So, P(X=0) = ([tex]e^{-1.6}[/tex]×1.6⁰)/0! = 0.2019,

P(X=1) = ([tex]e^{-1.6}[/tex]×1.6¹)/1! = 0.3230,

P(X=2) = ([tex]e^{-1.6}[/tex]×1.6²)/2! = 0.2584,

Substituting the values, in P(X≤2),

We get,

P(X≤2) = 0.2019 + 0.3230 + 0.2584

P(X≤2) = 0.2019 + 0.3230 + 0.2584

P(X≤2) = 0.7833.

Therefore, the required probability is 0.7833.

Learn more about Probability here

https://brainly.com/question/31603869

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

If the average number of nonconforming units is 1.6, what is the probability that a sample will contain 2 or less nonconforming units? Use Poisson distribution.

The amount that must be paid each year to repay a $200,000 loan over 25 years at an interest rate of 4% compounded annually is approximately $12,057.

To calculate the amount that must be paid each year to repay the $200,000 loan over 25 years at an interest rate of 4% compounded annually, we can use the formula for the present value of an annuity. This formula is given as:

PV = PMT x ((1 - (1 + r/n)^(-nt))/(r/n))

where PV is the present value of the annuity (in this case, the loan amount), PMT is the payment made each period (which is what we want to calculate), r is the annual interest rate (4%), n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year (1, since it is compounded annually), and t is the number of periods (25 years).

Plugging in the values, we get:

$200,000 = PMT x ((1 - (1 + 0.04/1)^(-1*25))/(0.04/1))

Solving for PMT, we get:

PMT = $200,000 / ((1 - (1 + 0.04/1)^(-1*25))/(0.04/1))

PMT = $12,057 (rounded to the nearest dollar)

Therefore, the amount that must be paid each year to repay the $200,000 loan over 25 years at an interest rate of 4% compounded annually is approximately $12,057.

To learn more about present value of the annuity click here: brainly.com/question/30408707

#SPJ11

If the integral ∫₀⁵ f(x) dx = 5 and ∫₀⁵g(x) dx = 12, then the value of

(a) ∫₀⁵ (f(x) + g(x)) dx = 17

(b) ∫₅⁰g(x) dx = -12

(c) ∫₀⁵(2f(x) - 13g(x))dx = -146

(d) ∫₀⁵ (f(x) - x) dx = -15/2

Part (a) : Using linearity of integrals, we have:

∫₀⁵ (f(x) + g(x)) dx = ∫₀⁵ f(x) dx + ∫₀⁵ g(x) dx

Substituting the value of integrals,

We get,

= 5 + 12 = 17.

So, ∫₀⁵ (f(x) + g(x)) dx = 17.

Part (b) : The integral ∫₅⁰g(x) dx can be written as -∫₀⁵g(x) dx

So, substituting the values,

We get,

= - 12.

So, ∫₅⁰g(x) dx = -12.

Part (c) : Using linearity of integrals, we have:

∫₀⁵ (2f(x) - 13g(x))dx = 2∫₀⁵ f(x) dx - 13∫₀⁵g(x) dx = 2(5) - 13(12) = -146.

So, ∫₀⁵ (2f(x) - 13g(x))dx = -146.

Part (d) : Using linearity of integrals, we have:

∫₀⁵ (f(x) - x)dx = ∫₀⁵ f(x) dx - ∫₀⁵ x dx

The integration of x is x²/2, so:

∫₀⁵ x dx = [x²/2]₀⁵ = (5²/2) - (0²/2) = 25/2.

Substituting this result and the value of ∫₀⁵ f(x) dx = 5,

We get,

∫₀⁵ (f(x) - x)dx = 5 - 25/2 = -15/2,

Therefore, ∫₀⁵ (f(x) - x)dx = -15/2.

Learn more about Integral here

https://brainly.com/question/27746495

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

Suppose that ∫₀⁵ f(x) dx = 5 and ∫₀⁵g(x) dx = 12, Calculate the following integrals.

(a) ∫₀⁵ (f(x) + g(x)) dx

(b) ∫₅⁰g(x) dx

(c) ∫₀⁵(2f(x) - 13g(x))dx

(d) ∫₀⁵ (f(x) - x) dx

B. With test statistics of 2.40 and a critical value of 2.326, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. The manufacturer's claim cannot be rejected.

To test whether the sample information supports the manufacturer's claim that their 12-ounce cans do not contain more than 30 calories on average, we can use a one-sample t-test. The null hypothesis is that the true mean calorie content of the cans is equal to or less than 30 calories, while the alternative hypothesis is that it is greater than 30 calories.
Using the sample mean of 31.8 calories, the sample standard deviation of 3 calories, and a sample size of 16, we can calculate the t-value as follows:
t = (31.8 - 30) / (3 / √(16)) = 2.40
The degree of freedom for this test is 15 (n - 1). Using a significance level of alpha = 0.01 and a one-tailed test, the critical t-value is 2.602.
Comparing the calculated t-value of 2.40 to the critical t-value of 2.602, we can see that it falls within the non-rejection region. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the sample information does not provide enough evidence to support the manufacturer's claim that their 12-ounce cans contain, on average, less than or equal to 30 calories. The correct answer is B: with test statistics of 2.40 and a critical value of 2.326, we failed to reject the null hypothesis. The manufacturer's claims cannot be rejected.

Learn more about evidence here:

https://brainly.com/question/15880833

#SPJ11

In a Taylor series, the polynomial t3(x) represents the third degree Taylor polynomial of a function. It is an approximation of the function near a specific point, obtained by taking the first three terms of the Taylor series expansion.

The polynomial t3(x) is given by t3(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + (f''(a)/2!)(x-a)^2 + (f'''(a)/3!)(x-a)^3, where f(a) is the value of the function at the point a, f'(a) is its first derivative, f''(a) is its second derivative, and f'''(a) is its third derivative.

In the context of Taylor series, polynomial T3(x) refers to the third-degree Taylor polynomial. It is an approximation of a given function using the first four terms of the Taylor series expansion. The general formula for the Taylor series is:

f(x) ≈ f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + f''(a)(x-a)^2/2! + f'''(a)(x-a)^3/3! + ...

For T3(x), you'll consider the first four terms of the series:

T3(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + f''(a)(x-a)^2/2! + f'''(a)(x-a)^3/3!

Here, f(a) represents the function value at the point 'a', and f'(a), f''(a), and f'''(a) represent the first, second, and third derivatives of the function evaluated at 'a', respectively. The T3(x) polynomial approximates the given function in the vicinity of the point 'a' up to the third degree.

Learn more about polynomial at: brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ11

Add up the 3 items for subtotal.

Then take that subtotal and multiply by 0.20 (which is the same as 20%). That's your tip.

Add subtotal + tip and there's your total bill.

See attached screenshot.

Hope you have a good afternoon : )

If we have 90 balls in a basket, 30 of which are red and the rest are yellow and black, we can calculate the probability of drawing a yellow ball by dividing the number of yellow balls by the total number of balls in the basket.

Since we know that there are 30 red balls in the basket, the remaining 60 balls must be either yellow or black. We don't know how many of these 60 balls are yellow or black, so we need to calculate the probability of drawing a yellow ball without this information.

The probability of drawing a yellow ball is the number of yellow balls divided by the total number of balls in the basket. Therefore, the probability of drawing a yellow ball can be calculated as:

Probability of yellow ball = Number of yellow balls / Total number of balls

Since we know there are 30 red balls, we subtract this number from the total number of balls to get:

Total number of yellow and black balls = 90 - 30 = 60

We don't know how many of these 60 balls are yellow, but we know that all of them are either yellow or black. Therefore, the probability of drawing a yellow ball can be calculated as:

Probability of yellow ball = Number of yellow balls / Total number of yellow and black balls

Since we don't know the number of yellow balls, we can assume that all of the remaining 60 balls are yellow. Therefore, the probability of drawing a yellow ball can be calculated as:

Probability of yellow ball = Number of yellow balls / Total number of yellow and black balls = 60 / 90 = 2/3

This means that the probability of drawing a yellow ball from the basket is 2/3, or approximately 0.67.

Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/32066441

#SPJ11

Monetary Unit Sampling ensures larger dollar components are selected for examination by using stratification and probability theory, which improves the effectiveness of the audit and saves time and resources.

Monetary Unit Sampling (MUS) is a statistical sampling method used in auditing to estimate the number of monetary errors in a population of transactions. MUS ensures that larger dollar components are selected for examination by using probability theory and stratification techniques.

In MUS, each individual transaction is assigned a dollar value or monetary unit. The auditor then selects a sample of transactions using a random sampling method, with a higher probability of selecting larger monetary units. This is achieved by stratifying the population into different strata or layers based on their monetary value.

For example, the population may be divided into strata such as transactions under $1,000, transactions between $1,000 and $10,000, and transactions over $10,000. The auditor can then assign different sampling rates to each stratum, with a higher sampling rate for the larger stratum.

By selecting larger dollar components for examination, MUS can improve the effectiveness of the audit by focusing on transactions with a higher potential for material misstatement. This can also reduce the sample size required for the audit, saving time and resources while still providing a reasonable estimate of the monetary errors in the population.

To learn more about Monetary Unit Sampling

https://brainly.com/question/29440137

#SPJ4

To find the Taylor series for f centered at 4, we need to compute the derivatives of f at x = 4 and then evaluate them at x = 4. The Taylor series for f centered at 4 is given by:

f(x) = f(4) + f'(4)(x - 4) + (f''(4)/2!)(x - 4)^2 + (f'''(4)/3!)(x - 4)^3 + ...

To compute the derivatives of f at x = 4, we need to use the given formula:

f(n)(4) = (-1)^n n! / (8^n (n+7))

Using this formula, we can compute the derivatives of f as follows:

f(4) = f(4) = (-1)^0 0! / (8^0 (0+7)) = 1/7

f'(4) = (-1)^1 1! / (8^1 (1+7)) = -1/64

f''(4) = (-1)^2 2! / (8^2 (2+7)) = 3/2048

f'''(4) = (-1)^3 3! / (8^3 (3+7)) = -5/32768

Substituting these values into the Taylor series formula, we get:

f(x) = 1/7 - (1/64)(x - 4) + (3/2048)(x - 4)^2 - (5/32768)(x - 4)^3 + ...

This is the Taylor series for f centered at 4. We can use this series to approximate the value of f at any point near x = 4. The more terms we include in the series, the better the approximation will be.

Learn more about derivatives here: brainly.com/question/25324584

#SPJ11

The difference in degrees of the two ramps is  = 5° - 10° = - 5°

The difference in degrees between the two ramps can be calculated by subtracting the steepness of the home ramp 10° from the steepness of the business ramp 5°

The difference in degrees = 5° - 10° = - 5°

The result is - 5°, indicating that the home ramp 5 degrees steeper than the business ramp. The negative sign implies that the home ramp exceeds the steepness limit set for the business ramp.

It's important to note that a negative difference in degrees doesint make practical sense in this context. The difference should be expressed as a positive value, so incase. we can say that the business ramp is 5 degrees less steep than the home ramp.

Learn more about ramp below.

https://brainly.com/question/30794715

#SPJ1

Answer: C

[tex]1,436.8ft^{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

First, find the radius:

r= d/2 ; d=diameter

r=(14)/2

r= 7ft

Then, find the volume of the sphere:

V= [tex]\frac{4}{3}[/tex][tex]\pi[/tex][tex]r^{3}[/tex]

 =  [tex]\frac{4}{3} \pi 7^{3}[/tex]

 =  [tex]\frac{4}{3} \pi 343[/tex]

 = [tex]1,436.8ft^{3}[/tex]  

The height of the trapezoid is 98 units

The space enclosed by the boundary of a plane figure is called its area.

A trapeziod is a closed shape or a polygon, that has four sides, four corners/vertices and four angles

The area of a trapezoid is expressed as;

A = 1/2( a+b)h

where a and b are the bases length of the trapezoid.

245= 1/2 ( 14+21)h

490 = 35h

divide both sides by 35

h = 490/35

h = 98 units

Therefore the height of the trapezoid is 98 units

learn more about area of trapezoid from

https://brainly.com/question/1410008

#SPJ1

There are 24 possible outcomes  in the experiment

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

There are 6 faces in the die and 4 sections in the spinner

using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Face = 6

Sections = 4

The outcomes that are possible is calculated as

outcomes = Face * Sections

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

outcomes = 6* 4

Evaluate

outcomes =24

Hence, there are 24 outcomes that are possible

Read more about sample size at

https://brainly.com/question/17203075

#SPJ1

The point on the curve y=tanh(x) at which the tangent has slope 16/25 is approximately (1.075, 0.789).

To find this point, we start by taking the derivative of y=tanh(x) to get y' = sech^2(x). We then set sech^2(x) equal to 16/25 and solve for x to get x = arccosh(sqrt(9/16)). This gives us the x-coordinate of the point on the curve where the tangent has slope 16/25. To find the corresponding y-coordinate, we evaluate y = tanh(arccosh(sqrt(9/16))) to get approximately 0.789. Therefore, the point on the curve where the tangent has slope 16/25 is approximately (1.075, 0.789).

Learn more about derivative here: brainly.com/question/3405774

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex]14[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

if you have any questions tag it on comments

hope it helps!!!

The equation with a degree of 4 and x-intercepts located at (-3,0), (7,0) and (-8,0) and a y-intercept located at (0,168) is y=(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x+1).

Explanation:

The given equation has x-intercepts located at (-3,0), (7,0) and (-8,0). This means that the factors of the equation must be (x+3), (x-7), and (x+8). Further, the y-intercept of the equation is located at (0,168), which means that the constant term in the equation must be 168.

Thus, the equation can be written as y = a(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x+b), where a and b are constants to be determined. To find the values of a and b, we can use the fact that the y-intercept of the equation is located at (0,168). Substituting x=0 and y=168 in the equation, we get:

168 = a(0+3)(0-7)(0+8)(0+b)

168 = -a378b

b = -3/2

Substituting this value of b in the equation, we get:

y = a(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2)

Now, to determine the value of a, we can use any of the given x-intercepts. Let's use the x-intercept (-3,0). Substituting x=-3 and y=0 in the equation, we get:

0 = a(-3+3)(-3-7)(-3+8)(-3-3/2)

0 = a*(-7)5(-9/2)

a = 0

Thus, the value of a is 0. Substituting this value of a in the equation, we get:

y = 0(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2)

y = (x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2)

Therefore, the equation with a degree of 4 and x-intercepts located at (-3,0), (7,0) and (-8,0) and a y-intercept located at (0,168) is y=(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2).

To learn more about y-intercept  click here, brainly.com/question/14180189

#SPJ11

[tex]\tan(A )=\cfrac{\stackrel{opposite}{9}}{\underset{adjacent}{3}} \implies \tan( A )= 3\implies A =\tan^{-1}\left( 3 \right)\implies A \approx 71.57^o[/tex]

Make sure your calculator is in Degree mode.

The output of this code will be the critical value `z*` for an 80% confidence interval.

To find the critical value `z*` for an 80% confidence interval for a proportion, we need to use the standard normal distribution. The formula for the confidence interval for a proportion is:

```

p ± z* √(p*(1-p)/n)

```

where `p` is the sample proportion, `n` is the sample size, and `z*` is the critical value from the standard normal distribution.

We can find `z*` using the `qnorm()` function in R, which gives the inverse of the cumulative distribution function of the normal distribution. For an 80% confidence interval, we want to find the value of `z*` such that the area under the normal curve to the right of `z*` is 0.1 (since we want a two-tailed test, we need to divide the significance level of 0.2 by 2). This can be computed as follows:

```

z_star <- qnorm(0.1/2)

```

The output of this code will be the critical value `z*` for an 80% confidence interval.

Explanation:

The `qnorm()` function in R calculates the inverse of the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the standard normal distribution. The CDF gives the probability that a standard normal random variable is less than or equal to a given value. By taking the inverse of the CDF at a given probability level, we can find the corresponding value on the standard normal distribution that has that probability to its left. For example, if we want to find the value of `z*` such that the area to the right of `z*` is 0.1, we can use the `qnorm()` function with the argument `1-0.1` (since the CDF gives the probability to the left of a value, and we want the area to the right). The resulting value is the critical value `z*` that we need for an 80% confidence interval.

Learn more about :

standard normal distribution : brainly.com/question/29509087

#SPJ11

The slope of the line is a positive slope. The value of the slope is 2/3.

From the question, we are to determine if the slope of the line is positive, negative, undefined, or zero

First, we will calculate the slope of the line ,

Using the formula,

Slope = (y₂ - y₁) / (x₂ - x₁)

Pick two points: (0, -3) and (3, -1)

Thus,

Slope = (-1 - (-3)) / (3 - 0)

Slope = (-1 + 3)) / (3)

Slope = (2) / (3)

Slope = 2/3

Since the value of the slope is positive, the slope is a positive slope.

Hence,

The slope is positive.

Learn more on Slope here: brainly.com/question/29044610

#SPJ1

Answer:

Steve is correct

After the point pass 3 miles on the x - axis the yellow car is more expensive because the yellow line is above the blue line indicating it's price was more. Before the 3 Mile mark theblue line was above the yellow.

a)This is a contradiction since n²=3m-1 is not possible for any integer m. Therefore, we conclude that 3 must divide n. b)Therefore, 3 must be irrational.

(a) Let's prove that if 3 divides n², then 3 divides n. Suppose by contradiction that 3 does not divide n. Then n can be written as 3k+1 or 3k+2 for some integer k. Squaring these expressions yields n²=9k²+6k+1 or n²=9k²+12k+4, respectively. In either case, we can factor out 3 from the first two terms of the right-hand side to get n²=3(3k²+2k)+1 or n²=3(3k²+4k+1)+1. Since n² is divisible by 3, it must be of the form 3m for some integer m. But this is a contradiction since n²=3m-1 is not possible for any integer m. Therefore, we conclude that 3 must divide n.

(b) To prove that 3 is irrational, suppose by contradiction that 3 can be expressed as a fraction m/n in lowest terms, where m and n are integers. Then we have 3n = m, which implies that 3 divides m. Let m = 3k for some integer k. Substituting this into the fraction gives 3n = 3k, which simplifies to n = k. Therefore, m and n have a common factor of 3, contradicting the assumption that the fraction was in lowest terms. Therefore, 3 must be irrational.

Learn more about irrational here:

https://brainly.com/question/29204809

#SPJ11

If the exchange rate were 5 Egyptian pounds per US dollar, a watch that costs $25 US dollars would cost 125 Egyptian pounds.

The exchange rate is the price at which one currency can be exchanged for another. In this case, the exchange rate is 5 Egyptian pounds per US dollar. This means that one US dollar can be exchanged for 5 Egyptian pounds.

To find out how much a watch that costs $25 US dollars would cost in Egyptian pounds, we need to multiply the cost in US dollars by the exchange rate:

$25 x 5 = 125 Egyptian pounds

Therefore, if the exchange rate were 5 Egyptian pounds per US dollar, a watch that costs $25 US dollars would cost 125 Egyptian pounds.

Learn more about exchange rate here:

brainly.com/question/17906368

#SPJ11

The p-value for a right-tail hypothesis test in the t-distribution with 11 degrees of freedom and a test statistic of 2.201 is approximately 0.023.

In a hypothesis test, the p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed one, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A smaller p-value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis. In this case, since we are performing a right-tail test, we are interested in the probability of getting a t-value greater than 2.201. We can use a t-distribution table or a calculator to find that the corresponding area to the right of 2.201 with 11 degrees of freedom is approximately 0.023. Therefore, if the significance level (alpha) of the test is less than 0.023, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the alternative hypothesis is supported.

Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/14309613

#SPJ11

The area under the normal curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 is approximately 0.0359, which corresponds to answer choice b.

The area under the normal curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 can be calculated using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator with a normal distribution function.

Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find the area under the curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 in the body of the table, where the rows represent the tenths and hundredths digits of z, and the columns represent the hundredths digits of the area.

Looking up z = 0.0, we find the area to be 0.5000. Looking up z = 1.79, we find the area to be 0.4641. To find the area between these two values, we can subtract the smaller area from the larger area:
0.4641 - 0.5000 = -0.0359

However, since we are looking for the area under the curve (which cannot be negative), we need to take the absolute value of this result:
| -0.0359 | = 0.0359

Therefore, the area under the normal curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 is approximately 0.0359, which corresponds to answer choice b.

Know more about the area here:

https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ11

f(x) has a local maximum at x = 1.

To find the values of x for which f(x) has a local maximum, we used critical points and the first derivative test. The critical points are the values of x where the derivative of f(x) is equal to zero or undefined.

The first derivative test involves analyzing the sign of the derivative on either side of a critical point to determine the local behavior of the function (increasing or decreasing) and therefore whether the critical point is a local maximum or minimum.

Here we have

for f(x) = x− lnx, and 0.1 ≤ x ≤ 2

To find the local maximum of f(x), we need to look for the critical points where the derivative of f(x) is equal to zero or undefined.

So, let's start by finding the derivative of f(x):

=> f'(x) = 1 - (1/x) = (x-1)/x

Now find the values of x for which f'(x) = 0 or f'(x) is undefined.

f'(x) = 0 when (x-1)/x = 0, which is equivalent to x-1 = 0 or x = 1.

f'(x) is undefined when x = 0 (because of the term 1/x),

but this value is not in the given interval [0.1, 2].

So, the only critical point in the given interval is x = 1.

Next, we need to check the behavior of f(x) around x = 1 to determine if it is a local maximum or minimum.

When x is slightly less than 1 (e.g., 0.9), f'(x) is negative, which means that f(x) is decreasing.

When x is slightly greater than 1 (e.g., 1.1), f'(x) is positive, which means that f(x) is increasing.

Therefore,

f(x) has a local maximum at x = 1.

Learn more about Local maximum at

https://brainly.com/question/14319836

#SPJ4

If we consider function f(0) and f(9), we have f(0) = (0 + 2) mod 11 = 2 and f(9) = (9 + 2) mod 11 = 0.

(a) False. The function f : Z → Z₁1 given by f(x) = (x + 2) mod 11 is not one-to-one. To justify this, we need to show that there exist two distinct elements in Z that map to the same element in Z₁1 under f. If we consider f(0) and f(9), we have f(0) = (0 + 2) mod 11 = 2 and f(9) = (9 + 2) mod 11 = 0. Since 2 and 0 are distinct elements in Z₁1, but they both map to the same element 0 in Z₁1 under f, the function is not one-to-one.

(b) True. The sets {{0}} and {{0}, 0} are equal. This can be justified by considering the definition of sets. In set theory, sets are defined by their elements, and duplicate elements within a set do not change its identity. Both {{0}} and {{0}, 0} contain the element 0. The set {{0}} has only one element, which is 0. The set {{0}, 0} also has only one element, which is 0. Therefore, both sets have the same element, and hence they are equal.

(c) True. If A x C = B x C and C is not an empty set, then A = B. This can be justified by considering the cancellation property of sets. Since C is not an empty set, there exists at least one element in C. Let's call this element c. Since A x C = B x C, it implies that for any element a in A and c in C, there exists an element b in B such that (a, c) = (b, c). By the cancellation property, we can cancel out the element c from both sides of the equation, giving us a = b. This holds for all elements in A and B, so we can conclude that A = B.

(d) False. The inverse of -4 modulo 17 is not 4. To find the inverse of -4 modulo 17, we need to find an integer x such that (-4 * x) mod 17 = 1. However, in this case, no such integer exists. If we calculate (-4 * 4) mod 17, we get (-16) mod 17 = 1, which shows that 4 is not the inverse of -4 modulo 17. In fact, the inverse of -4 modulo 17 does not exist, as there is no integer x that satisfies the equation.

Learn more about mod here:

https://brainly.com/question/32684026

#SPJ11

Molly has 12 quarters and 20 nickels in her collection of coins. This can be determined by using a system of equations to solve for the number of quarters and nickels.

To begin, let x represent the number of quarters Molly has. Since she has 8 more nickels than quarters, the number of nickels she has can be represented as x + 8. The value of her quarters is 25x cents (since each quarter is worth 25 cents), and the value of her nickels is 5(x + 8) cents (since each nickel is worth 5 cents). The total value of her coins is $5.20, which is equivalent to 520 cents.

We can now set up an equation using the values we've determined:

25x + 5(x + 8) = 520

Simplifying and solving for x, we get:

30x + 40 = 520

30x = 480

x = 16

So Molly has 16 quarters, and since she has 8 more nickels than quarters, she has 16 + 8 = 24 nickels. Therefore, Molly has 12 quarters and 20 nickels in her collection of coins.

In summary, Molly has 12 quarters and 20 nickels in her collection of coins, which add up to a total value of $5.20. To find this answer, we used a system of equations to represent the number and value of quarters and nickels in terms of x (the number of quarters). We then solved for x and used that value to determine the number of quarters and nickels Molly has.

Learn more about Quarter:

brainly.com/question/1253865

#SPJ11