The theory that believes that law violators may have suffered damage to their personalities early in their development that renders them powerless to control their impulses is the "psychodynamic theory".
The psychodynamic theory is a psychological perspective that emphasizes the role of early childhood experiences and unconscious motives in shaping behavior. This theory suggests that personality is shaped by the interactions between the id, ego, and superego, which are three components of the psyche that represent different aspects of our personality.
According to this theory, individuals who engage in criminal behavior may have experienced traumatic events or disruptions in their early development that have compromised their ability to regulate their impulses and behaviors. These individuals may have unresolved psychological conflicts or repressed emotions that lead them to act out in ways that violate the law.
learn more about psychodynamic theory here:
https://brainly.com/question/7804684
#SPJ4
felippe, a 17-year-old high school senior, is very talkative, intelligent, assertive, and politically conservative. research suggests that he would be most likely to develop a close friendship with
Due to his talkativeness, intelligence, assertiveness, and political conservatism, Felippe is most likely to form a deep bond with someone who holds similar beliefs.
Felippe, being talkative, intelligent, assertive, and politically conservative, would be most likely to develop a close friendship with someone who shares similar political views and values. As political beliefs often play a significant role in shaping one's personality and outlook on life, having friends who share similar beliefs can create a sense of comfort and belonging. Additionally, Felippe's assertiveness and talkative nature may lead him to seek out friends who are equally confident and outspoken, allowing for dynamic and engaging conversations.
Learn more about conservatism here
https://brainly.com/question/21091950
#SPJ11
Based on research, Felippe is likely to develop a close friendship with individuals who share similar traits and interests.
In this case, Felipe's talkative and assertive nature may attract outgoing individuals who enjoy engaging in stimulating conversations. Additionally, Felipe's intelligence may draw in like-minded individuals who enjoy discussing current events or academic topics.
Felippe's political conservatism may also play a role in his choice of friends. Research has shown that individuals often form friendships with others who share their political beliefs and values.
Therefore, Felippe may be more likely to befriend other politically conservative individuals.
Overall, Felipe's personality traits and interests are likely to attract individuals who share similar characteristics, including being talkative, intelligent, assertive, and politically conservative.
It is important to note that these are only generalizations based on research, and individual friendships are influenced by many factors beyond personality traits and interests.
to know more about friendship refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31234166#
#SPJ11
How do we determine the limits of our responsibilities to strangers?
Gender can play a significant role in determining the limits of our obligations to strangers.
Moral obligations of a Mother-For instance, moms usually shoulder the majority of the burden of parenting their children.
Do moms have different moral obligations than other people? Would you say that a mother leaving her own kids to feed malnourished children in Haiti goes beyond the bounds of moral obligation.
What happens when a mother from Haiti abandons her own children to look after rich children in the first world in order to provide assistance for her family back home.
Determinants of Moral Responsibility-1) The connection between the agent's actions and the harm that resulted; and 2) The morality of the action without consideration for the effects. Subjects' assessments of the agent's accountability were observed to vary in situations when these two features were at odds, particularly when the injury was not directly caused by the act that was held accountable.
Hence, we can say Gender can be used determine the limits of our responsibilities to strangers.
To know more about Moral Obligations visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31327835
#SPJ1
Name the agency of the Department of Justice charged with enforcing laws against narcotics trafficking.a. NCIC b. Secret Service c. DEA d. SSA
C. DEA agency of the Department of Justice charged with enforcing laws against narcotics trafficking.
The Drug Enforcement Administration is primarily a federal law enforcement organization in the United States that reports to the Department of Justice and is responsible for countering illicit drug trafficking and shipping within the country.
The DEA is America's tenacious combatant against the illicit supply of drugs. DEA Special Agents are on the hunt for the most notorious drug trafficking and narco-terrorist organizations that pose a threat to our country. Special Agent responsibilities include collecting and organizing evidence to assist in the prosecution of serious violators of US drug laws.
The Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) is a single-mission body tasked with enforcing drug prohibitions. The ATF's primary mission is to enforce federal weapons laws and to investigate arson and bombs. In scenarios in which our jurisdictions overlap, the FBI collaborates extensively with both agencies.
learn more about the DEA agency here:
https://brainly.com/question/29453276
#SPJ4
the power or right to choose among several alternatives on the basis of a moral question is termed:
The power or right to choose among several alternatives on the basis of a moral question is termed "moral agency."
One key aspect of moral agency is the ability to make choices based on moral reasoning. Moral reasoning involves the cognitive process of evaluating different moral principles, values, or ethical theories in order to arrive at a decision or course of action.
It involves critical thinking, reflection, and the consideration of various moral perspectives and implications.
Moral agency also encompasses the idea of moral responsibility. This means that individuals are accountable for their actions and the consequences that result from their choices.
Moral responsibility implies that individuals have a duty to consider the ethical implications of their decisions and to act in a way that aligns with their moral principles and values.
Moral agency is not limited to individuals alone, but can also apply to entities such as organizations, institutions, and governments.
For example, an organization may be considered morally responsible for its actions, decisions, and policies that affect employees, customers, or the broader society.
In such cases, the concept of moral agency highlights the need for collective decision-making that takes into account ethical considerations and the impact of choices on various stakeholders.
To learn more about stakeholders, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/30463383
#SPJ11
policies and practices intended to focus on health promotion and disease prevention should
Heavy construction equipment and farm equipment are commonly referred to as__
Answer:
heavy machinery or Earthmover
Explanation:
Hope this helps
The __________ was designed for younger, less hardened offenders between 16 & 30 years old
The Youthful Offender System (YOS) was designed for younger, less hardened offenders between 16 & 30 years old.
This program is specifically designed for individuals who are between the ages of 16 and 30 and who have committed non-violent offenses. The goal of the program is to provide young offenders with an opportunity to receive education and training while also addressing the root causes of their criminal behavior. This approach recognizes that younger offenders may be more receptive to rehabilitation than older, more hardened criminals.
To know more about YOS click on below link :
https://brainly.com/question/28345476#
#SPJ11
Why are a growing number of constitutional scholars, lawyers and judges questioning its wisdom? Exclusionary rule:
The exclusionary rule is: a legal principle in the United States that prevents evidence collected or analyzed in violation of the defendant's constitutional rights from being used in a court of law.
Its purpose is to deter law enforcement officers from conducting unlawful searches and seizures and to ensure that individuals' rights under the Fourth Amendment are protected.
A growing number of constitutional scholars, lawyers, and judges are questioning the wisdom of the exclusionary rule for several reasons.
First, they argue that it can result in guilty criminals being set free because crucial evidence is deemed inadmissible.
Second, some believe that the rule's deterrent effect on police misconduct is limited, as there are alternative remedies, such as civil lawsuits and internal disciplinary actions.
Lastly, critics argue that the exclusionary rule is overly broad, and that there should be exceptions to allow for the admissibility of evidence in certain cases, such as when the violation was made in good faith or when the evidence would have been discovered eventually.
In summary, the exclusionary rule is designed to protect individuals' constitutional rights by excluding unlawfully obtained evidence from trials. However, its effectiveness and fairness are increasingly being debated by legal experts who question whether it is the best method to achieve its goals.
To know more about exclusionary rule, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/31118569#
#SPJ11
Complete question:
What is the exclusionary rule? What is its purpose? Why are a growing number of constitutional scholars, lawyers and judges questioning its wisdom?
A constitutional principle known as the exclusionary rule forbids the use of evidence gathered through unauthorised searches or seizures in court. The efficacy and wisdom of this rule, however, have been the subject of an expanding discussion among constitutional scholars, attorneys, and judges in recent years. Others contend that it is an essential safeguard against unconstitutional searches and seizures. Some claim that it makes it more difficult for law enforcement to adequately investigate and prosecute criminal activities. The continuous debate over the exclusionary rule ultimately emphasises the complexity and nuance of constitutional law as well as the continual demand for careful and thorough legal examination.
learn more about wisdom here
https://brainly.com/question/30009007
#SPJ11
T/F : aristotle was the first philosopher to develop a complex ethical philosophy related to the ideas of natural law theory
The statement "Aristotle was the first philosopher to develop a complex ethical philosophy related to the ideas of natural law theory" is true. He believed that morality was not just a set of rules or guidelines but rather a natural part of human life that could be discovered through observation and reason.
According to Aristotle, natural law theory held that there were certain basic principles or values that were inherent in the world and that could be discovered through rational inquiry. These principles included things like justice, equality, and the common good, and they formed the foundation of his ethical philosophy.
Aristotle's natural law theory was based on the idea that humans have a natural tendency to seek happiness and fulfillment and that these goals could only be achieved through living a virtuous life. He believed that virtues were habits or dispositions that enabled individuals to act in accordance with natural law principles and that these virtues could be developed through practice and habituation.
Overall, Aristotle's ethical philosophy represented a significant departure from earlier moral theories and has had a lasting impact on Western philosophical thought.
To know more about Aristotle refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28928819#
#SPJ11
Explique cuál es y en que consiste el recurso habilitado para los casos de decisiones que resuelven asuntos relativos a excepciones declinatorias
In a legal context, the word "exception" is frequently used to mean an item, idea, or person that deviates from the norm or is omitted from the general proposition/condition which is laid down.
According to the decision of State of Oregon v. Moravek 297 Or. App. 763, when a defendant invokes an exception in the context of criminal law, "it constitutes an affirmative defence, which the defendant must establish to prevail in the case".
An exception is a statement that something is not included in a contract, law, or deed, such as "Landlord rents to Tenant the first floor, with the exception of the storage room."
To express disagreement with a judge's decision, a lawyer may "take exception" to the decision.
The burden of proof for exceptions rests with the accused, who must establish the facts that qualify the case for any of the common exceptions. The court will assume that none of these circumstances exist. The defence must establish the accused's guilt.
To know more about exceptions click here
https://brainly.com/question/28682308
#SPJ4
The given question in English is:
Explain what it is and what the resource enabled for cases of decisions that resolve issues related to exceptions consists of.
some believe this rule is upheld by the wealthy to oppress the poor, a view that aligns with the ______ perspective.
some believe this rule is upheld by the wealthy to oppress the poor, a view that aligns with the Marxist perspective.
The Marxist perspective is based on the works of Karl Marx, who believed that the wealthy exploit the working class in order to maintain their power and wealth. The idea of the wealthy upholding a rule to oppress the poor is an example of this exploitation.
The wealthy are able to manipulate the rules and laws in their favor, while the poor are left behind with no voice or power. This creates an unequal society, where the working class is unable to achieve economic prosperity. The wealthy use their power to maintain their privileged status, while the poor are left to suffer in poverty.
This view aligns with the Marxist perspective, as it highlights the unequal power distribution between the wealthy and the working class in society. Ultimately, this rule is seen as a means to maintain the status quo and further the interests of the wealthy at the expense of the poor.
Know more about Marxist perspective here
https://brainly.com/question/29483756#
#SPJ11
the supreme court over time has ruled that ap gov u3 readings 6th f18
The Supreme Court is the highest judicial authority in the United States and plays a significant role in interpreting the Constitution and federal laws.
Over time, the Court has made landmark decisions that have shaped American society and government. These rulings, often referenced in AP Government Unit 3 readings, demonstrate the Court's power in maintaining a balance between the different branches of government and ensuring that individual rights are protected.
For example, the Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954 declared racial segregation in public schools unconstitutional, leading to the desegregation of public schools and marking a significant milestone in the civil rights movement.
The Court's decision in Roe v. Wade in 1973 established a woman's right to seek an abortion under the constitutional right to privacy, shaping the ongoing debate on reproductive rights in the United States.
The Court's decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission in 2010 expanded the role of corporations in political campaigns, shaping campaign finance laws and the influence of money in politics.
The Supreme Court also plays a critical role in maintaining a balance between the different branches of government. Through its decisions, the Court can limit the powers of the executive and legislative branches and ensure that they do not exceed their constitutional authority.
This role is essential for maintaining the system of checks and balances established by the U.S. Constitution, which aims to prevent the concentration of power and protect individual rights.
To learn more about supreme court, refer below:
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ11
Over time, the Supreme Court has rendered decisions in a number of cases that have profoundly influenced American politics and society. These judgements have dealt with a variety of topics, including abortion, voting rights, and civil rights. The most well-known cases include Citizens United v. FEC, Roe v. Wade, and Brown v. Board of Education. As the nation's top court, the Supreme Court's decisions are highly significant and frequently used as precedent in subsequent cases.
The Supreme Court has ruled on various cases over time that have had a significant impact on American government and society. These rulings have addressed issues such as civil rights, voting rights, abortion, and more. Some of the most notable cases include Brown v. Board of Education, Roe v. Wade, and Citizens United v. FEC. As the highest court in the land, the Supreme Court's rulings carry a great deal of weight and are often cited as precedent in future cases.
learn more about supreme court here
https://brainly.com/question/12848156
#SPJ11
a hearing held in some juvenile courts prior to the adjudication hearing in which the juvenile is made aware of his or her rights and is asked to enter a plea to the charges is called ________.
A hearing held in some juvenile courts prior to the adjudication hearing in which the juvenile is made aware of his or her rights and is asked to enter a plea to the charges is called arraignment hearing.
An arraignment hearing is typically the first court appearance for a juvenile who has been accused of committing a delinquent act (a crime under juvenile law). At this hearing, the judge will inform the juvenile of the charges against them and explain their rights, such as the right to an attorney and the right to remain silent.
The juvenile will then be asked to enter a plea to the charges. The three possible pleas are guilty, not guilty, and no contest (also known as nolo contendere).
If the juvenile pleads guilty or no contest, the judge may proceed directly to the disposition phase (sentencing), or may set a date for a disposition hearing. If the juvenile pleads not guilty, the case will be set for an adjudication hearing, which is similar to a trial.
It's important to note that in some states, the arraignment hearing may be combined with the adjudication hearing or may not be required at all. Additionally, the procedures and terminology used in juvenile court can vary depending on the jurisdiction.
learn more about Judistriction here:
https://brainly.com/question/12448353?utm_source=android&utm_medium=share&utm_campaign=question
#SPJ11
An arraignment hearing is the proceeding that takes place in some juvenile courts prior to the adjudication hearing and at which the juvenile is informed of his or her rights and requested to enter a plea to the charges. The juvenile is told of their rights, such as the right to an attorney, the right to silence, and the right to a fair trial, during the arraignment hearing.
The hearing held in some juvenile courts prior to the adjudication hearing in which the juvenile is made aware of his or her rights and is asked to enter a plea to the charges is called an arraignment hearing. During the arraignment hearing, the juvenile is informed of their rights, including the right to an attorney, the right to remain silent, and the right to a fair trial.
learn more about arraignment hearing here
https://brainly.com/question/19363268
#SPJ11
true or false identify an accurate statement about the drug policy instituted by major league baseball following the balco scandal.
The following statements concerning the drug policy adopted by Major League Baseball in the wake of the Balco scandal affair. True.
More players are receiving ADHD diagnoses in order to qualify for therapeutic-use exemptions from Major League Baseball's 2006 drug testing policy, which allows them to use stimulant medicines. After a Major League Baseball pitcher, age 23, fell and passed away during practice and was discovered to be using the plant, the FDA outlawed ephedra in 2004.
Sports organizations forbid the use of 'performance-enhancing drugs' or 'performance and image-enhancing substances' because they can provide athletes an unfair edge over rivals. PEDs have a broad list of side effects, including baldness, worsened acne, impotence, and "steroid rage." PEDs can also slow teenage development, according to the article.
Learn more about scandal visit: brainly.com/question/3406318
#SPJ4
a law changed after the contract was arranged but before the full performance of the contract. the law prohibits the transaction from taking place. this would be an example of
Answer:
Impossibility
Explanation:
In order to qualify for a liquor license, an applicant must prove, at minimum, all of the following except...
an applicant must prove all of these
no past abuse of alcohol
good character
not a party to any pending civil litigation
no prior felony convictions
In order to qualify for a liquor license, an applicant must prove all of the following: good character, no past abuse of alcohol, not a party to any pending civil litigation, and no prior felony convictions.
These requirements are put in place to ensure that those who are given the privilege of selling and serving alcohol are responsible and trustworthy individuals who will not put the public at risk.
Good character is essential for those who are going to be in the alcohol business. This means that they have a history of making ethical and moral decisions, and are generally respected in their community. Past abuse of alcohol is also important to consider since it could indicate a lack of responsibility or potential risk for future alcohol-related incidents.
Not being a party to any pending civil litigation is also a requirement, as it shows that the applicant is not currently facing any legal issues that could affect their ability to responsibly serve alcohol.
No prior felony convictions are required to ensure that the applicant does not have a history of serious criminal activity that could put the public at risk.
Learn more about liquor license here:
https://brainly.com/question/4982619
#SPJ4
this is a session that takes place without a jury before a judge in which evidence and/or arguments are presented to determine some factual or legal issue. A. Hearing
B. Diversion
C. Commitment
Hearing is a session that takes place without a jury before a judge in which evidence and/or arguments are presented to determine some factual or legal issue. The correct answer is A.
A hearing is a legal proceeding where evidence and arguments are presented to a judge to determine a factual or legal issue. Hearings are typically conducted in courtrooms or other official settings and may involve witnesses, testimony, and cross-examination.
Hearings can cover a variety of legal issues, such as motions to dismiss a case, bail hearings, or preliminary hearings to determine if there is enough evidence to proceed to trial. The purpose of a hearing is to allow both sides to present evidence and arguments to a judge, who will then make a decision based on the facts presented.
Unlike a trial, a hearing is typically held without a jury, and the judge is responsible for determining the outcome of the case.
To know more about legal issue, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/30178117#
#SPJ11
Why is it important to know how to write well as a Criminal Justice Professional or Law Enforcement Officer
Answer: "Poor writing affects the prosecution of cases and reflects poorly on both the individual officer and on the department".
Explanation:
Answer:
Its important to know how to write as those because gramar is everything and these job placement are very straightforward and strategic.
Explanation:
Up
in the united states, individuals accused or suspected of a crime are entitled to – , which protects them from arbitrary action by – .
In the United States, individuals accused or suspected of a crime are entitled to due process of law, which protects them from arbitrary action by national or state governments.
An individual who is suspected of committing a crime but has not been adjudicated guilty is known as a suspect. A suspect may be referred to as a defendant if they were the subject of an arrest warrant, and they would be known as an offender if they had been found guilty or had been found guilty after being found guilty.
An officer must genuinely believe that both the suspect and the offense for which they are being detained have been committed before they may make an arrest. If there was a reasonable cause for suspicion, any reasonable person would believe such a crime was taking place, already occurred, or was due to be committed very soon.
Learn more about Crime here:
https://brainly.com/question/6203610
#SPJ4
A §351 deferral is only available when a single shareholder transfers property for a controlling stock interest in a corporation. true or false?
False. A Section 351 deferral under the Internal Revenue Code is available when a shareholder transfers property to a corporation in exchange for stock, and it can apply to both single and multiple shareholders.
Under Section 351, the transfer of property to a corporation is not taxable if the transfer is made in exchange for stock in the corporation, and if immediately after the transfer, the transferor and other persons who transfer property to the corporation (if any) own at least 80% of the total combined voting power of all classes of stock entitled to vote and at least 80% of the total number of shares of all other classes of stock of the corporation.
Therefore, it is not necessary for a single shareholder to transfer property for a controlling stock interest in a corporation to qualify for a Section 351 deferral. Multiple shareholders can transfer property to the corporation and still qualify for the deferral if the 80% ownership requirement is met.
learn more about Section 351 here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788745
#SPJ4
It is true that a §351 deferral is only available when a single shareholder transfers property for a controlling stock interest in a corporation.
A §351 deferral is available when one or more shareholders transfer property to a corporation in exchange for stock, and the transferors are in control of the corporation immediately after the exchange. The control requirement is met if the transferors own at least 80% of the total combined voting power and 80% of the total number of shares of all other classes of stock. It is not limited to a single shareholder.
Know more about §351 deferral here:
https://brainly.com/question/14788745
#SPJ11