I need help with this but no one is helping me, It has to be 500 words.
MeToo is a social movement against s-exual abuse, s-exual harassment, and r-ape culture, in which people publicize their experiences of s-exual abuse or s-exual harassment.
The cases that emerged from Metoo movement:
1. 2006 Tarana B Case
Tarana B, a social activist and community organizer, began using phrase "MeToo" in 2006, on My-space to promote “empowerment through empathy” among women of color who have been s-exually abused. She was raped and s-exually assaulted. Through this movement she came out in public to seek justice for women like her.
2. 2015 Ambra G Case
Italian model Ambra reported a case and accused Weinstein of touching her inappropriately, he was arrested but later released by court due to lack of evidence.
Apart from these two cases, there were a lot of cases filed across the globe not just in US. Few other popular cases like 2017 Alyssa case and Johny-Amber case also fall under cases which resulted from Metoo movement.
Issue of Consent and Criminal Liability
The feminist slogan “no means no” became widely accepted and written into law. Youngsters came of age seeing themselves as more egalitarian in relationships and appreciative of how communication enhances intimacy. One expression of such expression has been development of the idea of affirmative consent. Affirmative consent is a knowing, voluntary and mutual decision among all participants to engage in intimacy.
Consent has been one of then factors in deciding Criminal liability in Metoo cases and therefore the movement also aims at changing the definition of consent itself.
Do r-ape shield laws work?
A question was posed on r-ape shield laws by the protestors when offenders were acquitted in several Metoo cases due to lack of evidence against them. However, a r-ape shield law limits the introduction of evidence by a defendant charged with r-ape. The evidence not allowed in concerns the victim's past s-exual conduct. Evidence against them is always allowed and it depends on work of investigative agencies to gather evidence against offenders.
Examples of some r-ape shield law include Violence Against Women Act (VAWA) which is a federal law and among states Arizona's Criminal Code includes a statute entitled, “Evidence Relating to Victim's Chastity.”
To know more about Metoo:
brainly.com/question/28708683
#SPJ1
There has been a shift from approaches to the concept of failed states that generally lack a description of what these states should actually look like to approaches that lump together all these countries without taking into consideration the unique characteristics and weaknesses of each unit. Discuss
In regards to the discussion on the shift from approaches to the concept of failed states that generally lack a description of what these states should actually look like, it is because Nation-states collapse because internal conflict prevents them from providing their citizens with beneficial political services.
What does it mean for a nation to be considered a failed state?A failed state is a political entity that has broken down to the point where the fundamental requirements and obligations of a sovereign government are no longer fulfilled (see also fragile state and state collapse).
A failing state is unable to carry out public policy, provide adequate infrastructure, and protect civil liberties and human rights. Residents of a failed state lack both physical security and effective political and economic structures.
Therefore, Failed State is seen as a situation of "state collapse" - for example, a state that is unable to carry out its essential development and security functions and that lacks effective control over its territory and borders.
Learn more about failed states from
https://brainly.com/question/12295180
#SPJ1
in eby, the supreme court stated allowing contractors to make a claim against architects would do which of the following:
In eby, the Court Decided that enabling contractors to sue architects would accomplish which of the following: produce a detrimental impact on the architect's impartiality or legal responsibility to the owner.
A court is any person or institution, frequently a government institution, with the jurisdiction to arbitrate legal disagreements between parties and administer justice in civil, penal, and administrative in conformity with the rule of law. Courts are the central mechanism of conflict resolution in both civil and common law legal systems, and it is widely assumed that everyone has the opportunity to bring their claim before such a court. Similarly, persons accused of a crime have the opportunity to provide a defense in court. The judiciary is the judicial system that interprets and executes the law. A venue is the location of a court.
learn more about legal responsibility here
https://brainly.com/question/27883274
#SPJ4
Miranda v. arizona if we are all charged with knowing the law, how could the court find that miranda needed to be informed of his rights by the state? could miranda be tried again for the same crime? what justification would the court have in imposing such a burden on the police? would they not be practicing law by giving such legal advice? was excluding the evidence (the confession) the only sanction available to the u.s. supreme court? can you think of some other sanctions that would still allow such evidence to be used but protect the innocent person who might be subjected to such treatment.
Miranda vs . Arizona occurred in 1996. the In this the Supreme Court ruled that detained criminal suspects before police questioning, must be properly informed of their constitutional right to an attorney and against self-incrimination.
Explain Miranda vs Arizona case.
In this case it was established that the Police need to make you aware about your Miranda Rights after an arrest and before questioning. It was established under 5 and 6 amendments of the US constitution.
It has provided detainees with the right to not to self incriminate along with the right to humanise their life.In the case of Miranda, he was tried and convicted again, without using the confession against him.In the final Outcome his conviction was overturned.This was the final result of the Miranda vs Arizona case.
To know more about Miranda vs Arizona from the given link
https://brainly.com/question/13483624
#SPJ4
Johnny is a forensic scientist. He tests for gunshot residue. Which of the following tests might Johnny use?
test, which should turn the material red if gunshot residue is present. For another item, he only has a
which is known to return conclusive results even on very small amounts.
Johnny uses the
small amount of material to test, so he chooses
Johnny uses the small amount of material to test.
How can gunshot residue be found using a test?Identifying GSR has been done since the late 1970s using a scanning electron microscope (SEM). For GSR analysis and identification in a laboratory setting, this method is the most trustworthy. The first step in this process is to use a swab that has been moistened with diluted nitric acid to swipe the suspect's hands, clothes, belt, or shoes.Other techniques, like atomic absorption, simply detect the quantity of bulk elements present and do not account for their form, making scanning electron microscopy the sole approach available to validate the presence of GSR particles.To learn more about GSR particles refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/28282704
#SPJ1
peer pressure __in why some teens get in a car with an impaired driver?
Answer: Some kids are a bad influence
Explanation: According to my studies, many teenagers build up a ball of rage inside their head. As a result, they peer pressure poor innocent children to feel happy. This is called a pyschopath.
After graduating from college you are offered what you believe is your dream job. You are working in the field in which you earned your degree and get a fantastic salary. As part of the job offer, you have been asked to sign a non-compete agreement in which you agree to not work for any other competing company for five years after you leave this company (whether voluntarily or involuntarily). You happily sign the agreement and begin work. However, within the first year, you are miserable and begin to look for another job. If you find another position at a competing company, may this company prevent you from taking it under the non-compete agreement you signed?
Yes, according to the non-compete agreement you signed when you started this job, the current employer may forbid you from accepting a position at a rival business.
What is non-compete agreement?The Covenant Not to Compete Act governs non-compete clauses in Texas. A non-compete agreement must be included in an otherwise enforceable contract that has reasonable restrictions on the amount of time, place, and type of activity that is being prohibited in order to be legal under the Act.
Under California law, non-compete agreements are not enforceable. The non-compete agreement with Legal Nature can still be used to stop an employee from luring clients and staff members away from the employer, nevertheless.
Non-compete clauses in employment contracts forbid employees from working for "competitor" businesses while they are currently employed or after. These contracts often impose limitations on employees in terms of time, profession, and/or location.
A non-compete clause, often known as a non-compete agreement, is a legal provision that normally forbids you from working for or joining a competitor.
Learn more about non-compete agreement, here
https://brainly.com/question/13708955
#SPJ1