To negate a conjunction, negate each of the component statements and change and to

The equation of the circle is x² + y² = 4 and the equation of the line is       y = 0.5x + 1

A circle is a closed curve that is drawn from the fixed point called the center, in which all the points on the curve are having the same distance from the center point of the center. The equation of a circle with (h, k) center and r radius is given by:

(x-h)^2 + (y-k)^2 = r^2

This is the standard form of the equation. Thus, if we know the coordinates of the center of the circle and its radius as well, we can easily find its equation.

In this problem, we need to just take two points as the diameter and then write out the equation of the circle.

Taking the points (-2, 0) and (2, 0)

The equation of the circle is ;

x² + y² = 4

This shows that h and k are 0.

The equation of the line can also be calculated as;

y = mx + c

m = slope of the line

m = y₂ - y₁ / x₂ - x₁

m = 2 - 0 / 2 - (-2)

m = 2 / 4

m = 1/2

The y-intercept is the point at which the line touches the y-axis

y = 1

The equation of the line is y = 1/2x + 1

Learn more on equation of circle here;

https://brainly.com/question/24810873

#SPJ1

The probability that Tate will hit 2 home runs in a row is P ( R ) = 4/81

Given data ,

Let the total number of throws be = 9

And , the number of times Tate hits a home run in 9 throws = 2

Now , the probability of Tate hitting a home run in a single at-bat is 2/9

The probability of hitting a home run in two consecutive at-bats is the product of the probabilities of hitting a home run in each individual at-bat, assuming that the outcomes of the at-bats are independent.

Therefore, the probability of Tate hitting 2 home runs in a row is P ( R )

P ( R ) = (2/9) x (2/9)

P ( R ) = 4/81

Hence , the probability is 4/81

To learn more about probability click :

https://brainly.com/question/17089724

#SPJ1

The probability that the drawn bead will be blue is 1/3.

Given that,

A cloth sack contains 25 red beads, 75 green beads, and 50 blue beads.

Total number of beads in the sack = 25 + 75 + 50 = 150

Number of blue beads = 50

Probability of drawing a blue bead = Number of blue beads / Total number of beads

= 50/150

= 1/3

Hence the required probability of drawing blue bead is 1/3.

Learn more about Probability here :

https://brainly.com/question/11234923

#SPJ1

The car loan has a monthly payment of around $971.56. Based on the loan amount, annual percentage rate, down payment, and loan term, this is determined using the present value of an annuity formula.

Christina has put down the following amount:

10% down payment times $43,599 equals $4,359.90.

She must borrow the upcoming amount:

Loan amount = $43,599 - $4,359.90 = $39,239.10

We must apply the of an annuity formula to determine the monthly payment:

Present value of annuity

=  PV = A×((1 – (1 / (1 + r)⁻ⁿ)) / r)

If A is the monthly payment, then r denotes the annual interest rate, n the frequency at which interest is compounded annually, and t the number of years.

Due to the loan's three-year term and monthly compounding of interest, we have:

n = 12 and t = 3

The annual interest rate is 1.99%, but we need to convert it to a monthly interest rate by dividing it by 12:

r = 1.99% / 12 = 0.1667%

Substituting the given values, we get:

Present value of annuity = A × [1 - (1 + 0.01667)⁻¹²ˣ³] / (0.01667)

≈ $35,056.33

Therefore, the monthly payment is:

Monthly payment = $35,056.33 / (12 × 3) ≈ $971.56

Learn more about present value :

https://brainly.com/question/17322936

#SPJ4

Answer:

6log 2

Step-by-step explanation:

log 16 + log 4 = log 2⁴ + log 2² = 4log 2 + 2log 2 = 6log 2

The valid values for probability are: a) P(A) = 0.4, d) P(A) = 4/5, f) P(B) = 20% and h) P(A) = 0

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

List of options

The valid values for probability are any value between 0 and 1 (inclusive)

This means that numbers less than 0 or greater than 1 are invalid

using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Read more about probability at

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ1

Increase in taxes is one of the reasons why the change in Mr. Henderson's net income

It is possible that Mr. Henderson's net income has decreased this month despite having received the same gross income as last month. Let us examine some of the plausible rationales behind it:

An increase in taxes: If Mr. Henderson worked more hours or obtained a raise, his gross income would be higher. However, if he now belongs to a higher tax bracket, he will owe more money in taxes and therefore have lower net income.

A change in deductions: It is likely that Mr. Henderson's employer may have modified his paycheck deductions which can lead to more taxes being held back from his earnings - an eventuality that could cause his net income to decrease.

Alterations in benefits: Changes in Mr. Henderson's approved employee benefits plan- insurance premiums increasing or retirement savings contributions stalling, for instance- could also explain why his net income reduced this month.

Read more on net income here:https://brainly.com/question/15530787

#SPJ1

Answer:

22.98133...

Step-by-step explanation:

30 x cos(40°)

then refine to a decimal form

Based on the definition of like terms, combining like terms in the expression, 8 + 7b - 10 + 2 would give us: 7b.

Like terms can be described as terms that have the same degree, or similar variables with the same power. For example, 2x and 3x have the same degree and the same variables, so they are like terms and can combined together.

Also, constants, that is, numbers without variables are also like terms that can be combined together. For example, given the expression, 6 - 5x + 3, the like terms are 6 and 3, and can be combined together.

Given the expression, 8 + 7b - 10 + 2, the like terms would be combined as follows:

7b + (8 - 10 + 2)

= 7b

Learn more about like terms on:

https://brainly.com/question/7852084

#SPJ1

The probability of either the system or the backup working properly is 1 - 0.02 = 0.98. Which is 0.02 x 0.02 = 0.0004 or 0.04%. Therefore, the probability that neither the system nor its backup is working properly at the end of the 30 days is very low, only 0.04%.

To find the probability that neither the primary computer system nor the backup system is working properly at the end of the 30-day period, we'll need to use the given probability of each system working properly (98%) and the fact that the systems work or fail independently.

Step 1: Find the probability of each system failing
Since each system has a 98% chance of working properly, the probability of it failing is 100% - 98% = 2%.

Step 2: Calculate the probability that both systems fail
Since the systems work or fail independently, we can multiply the probabilities of each system failing together:
2% (primary failing) x 2% (backup failing) = 0.02 x 0.02 = 0.0004

Step 3: Convert the probability to a percentage
0.0004 x 100% = 0.04%

Therefore, the probability that neither the primary computer system nor its backup are working properly at the end of the 30-day period is 0.04%.

Learn more about Probability:

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

Your average waiting time will be approximately 1 minute.

As the first passenger, you will not have to wait for any other passengers to get in the taxi. However, the taxi will wait for 2 passengers to arrive or 3 minutes to pass since your boarding.

Since passengers arrive according to a Poisson process with an average of 60 passengers per hour, the arrival rate lambda can be calculated as:

lambda = average number of passengers per time unit = 60/60 = 1 passenger per minute

The time between two consecutive passenger arrivals follows an exponential distribution with parameter lambda. Thus, the probability of waiting less than t minutes for the second passenger to arrive can be calculated as:

P(wait < t) = 1 - e^(-lambda*t)

We need to find the average waiting time until the second passenger arrives. This can be calculated as the area under the probability distribution curve divided by the arrival rate lambda:

average waiting time = integral from 0 to infinity of t*(1 - e^(-lambda*t)) dt / lambda

Using integration by parts, we can solve this integral to get:

average waiting time = 1/lambda + (1 - e^(-lambda*t))/(lambda^2)

Plugging in the values, we get:

average waiting time = 1/1 + (1 - e^(-1*3))/(1^2) = 1 + (1 - 0.0498) = 1.9502 minutes

Therefore, as the first passenger, your average waiting time until the second passenger arrives is 1.9502 minutes.

To answer your question, let's consider the two possible scenarios:

1. Two passengers are collected: In this case, the first passenger (you) waits for the second passenger to arrive. Since the arrival rate is 60 passengers per hour, the average time between arrivals is 1 minute (60 minutes / 60 passengers).

2. Three minutes have expired: In this case, the taxi departs after 3 minutes even if only one passenger (you) is in the taxi.

On average, the waiting time for the first passenger (you) will be the minimum of these two scenarios. Thus, your average waiting time will be approximately 1 minute.

Learn more about integration at: brainly.com/question/18125359

#SPJ11

In order to show that 6x2 + 3x + 4 is O(22), we need to find suitable values for c and k in the definition of big-O.  Recall that a function f(x) is O(g(x)) if there exist positive constants c and k such that |f(x)| ≤ c|g(x)| for all x ≥ k.

Looking at the options given, we can see that the value of c must be greater than or equal to 1, since we are looking for an upper bound for the function.

Option a, where c = 100 and k = 1, is not a suitable choice because it is too large of a value for c. Similarly, option e, where c = 7 and k = 87, is not a suitable choice because it is too large of a value for k.

Option b, where c = 13 and k = 1, is a possible choice. To show this, we need to prove that there exist constants c = 13 and k = 1 such that:

[tex]|6x2 + 3x + 4| ≤ 13|22| for all x ≥ 1.[/tex]

Note that |22| = 22 and |6x2 + 3x + 4| ≤ 6x2 + 3x + 4.

Thus, we need to show that:

6x2 + 3x + 4 ≤ 13(22) for all x ≥ 1.

Simplifying the inequality, we get:

6x2 + 3x + 4 ≤ 286

This inequality holds for all x ≥ 1, since the left-hand side is a quadratic function that is increasing for x ≥ 0. Therefore, option b is a suitable choice.

Option c, where c = 1 and k = 87, is not a suitable choice because it is too small of a value for c.

Option d, where c = 10 and k = 2, is not a suitable choice because it is too small of a value for k.

Option f, where c = 7 and k = 1, is also a possible choice. To show this, we need to prove that there exist constants c = 7 and k = 1 such that:

[tex]|6x2 + 3x + 4| ≤ 7|22| for all x ≥ 1.[/tex]

Note that |22| = 22 and |6x2 + 3x + 4| ≤ 6x2 + 3x + 4.

Thus, we need to show that:

6x2 + 3x + 4 ≤ 154 for all x ≥ 1.

This inequality holds for all x ≥ 1, since the left-hand side is a quadratic function that is increasing for x ≥ 0. Therefore, option f is also a suitable choice.

In summary, options b and f are both suitable choices for c and k in the definition of big-O to show that 6x2 + 3x + 4 is O(22).

Learn more about suitable  here:

https://brainly.com/question/28986754

#SPJ11

Answer: -1/3-(-3/5)=4/15

Step-by-step explanation:

P.S i'm emo

The zeros of the function are x = 0, x = 7, and x = 9.

The graph of f(x) is concave down near x = 7 and concave up near x = 9.

We have,

To find the zeros of the function f(x) = x^4 - 16x^3 + 63x^2,

We need to set f(x) equal to zero and solve for x:

x^4 - 16x^3 + 63x^2 = 0

Factor out x^2:

x^2(x^2 - 16x + 63) = 0

Factor the quadratic term:

x^2(x - 7)(x - 9) = 0

So the zeros of the function are x = 0, x = 7, and x = 9.

To describe the behavior of the graph at each zero, we can use the first and second derivative tests.

The first derivative of f(x) is:

f'(x) = 4x^3 - 48x^2 + 126x

The second derivative of f(x) is:

f''(x) = 12x^2 - 96x + 126

At x = 0, we have a double root, since x = 0 is a zero of multiplicity 2.

From the first derivative test, we see that f'(x) changes sign from negative to positive at x = 0, indicating that f(x) has a local minimum at x = 0.

From the second derivative test, we see that f''(0) = 126, which is positive. This means that the local minimum at x = 0 is a relative minimum, and the graph of f(x) is concave up near x = 0.

At x = 7 and x = 9, we have simple zeros.

From the first derivative test, we see that f'(x) changes sign from positive to negative at x = 7 and from negative to positive at x = 9, indicating that f(x) has local maximums at x = 7 and x = 9.

From the second derivative test, we see that f''(7) = -42 and f''(9) = 54, so the local maximum at x = 7 is a relative maximum, and the local maximum at x = 9 is a relative minimum.

Thus,

The zeros of the function are x = 0, x = 7, and x = 9.

The graph of f(x) is concave down near x = 7 and concave up near x = 9.

Learn more about functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/28533782

#SPJ1

The zeros of the graph are 0, 7, and 9.

To find the zeros of the function, we can set it equal to zero and factor:

[tex]x^4 - 16x^3 + 63x^2 \\= x^2(x^2 - 16x + 63) \\= x^2(x - 7)(x - 9)[/tex]

So the zeros are x = 0, x = 7, and x = 9.

We may look at the function's sign on either side of each zero to understand how the graph behaves there. The function's factored form may be used to our advantage here:

Examining the leading coefficient (which is positive) and the degree of the polynomial will also reveal the graph's general behavior (which is even). This indicates that if x increases or decreases, the graph will be upward-facing and will go closer to infinity in both directions.

Learn more about graphs here:

https://brainly.com/question/17267403

#SPJ1

Writing 1/(1 + x) + 2/(1 + x) as a single fraction , we get 3​/(1 + x)

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

1/1_x+2/1+x​

Express properly

So, we have

1/(1 + x) + 2/(1 + x)

Take the LCM of the fractions

So, we have

(1 + 2)/(1 + x)

Evaluate the sum of like terms

3​/(1 + x)

HEnce, the solution si 3​/(1 + x)

Read more about fractions at

https://brainly.com/question/17220365

#SPJ1

Explanation:

The three lengths given are

Notice that a+b = 1 cm +3 cm = 4 cm which is NOT larger than c = 100 cm

Therefore, a triangle is NOT possible.

For more information, check out the triangle inequality theorem.

That theorem says "a triangle is possible if any two sides add to something larger than the third side.

The daily inpatient census for July 16 is 271.

To determine the daily inpatient census for July 16, we need to take into account the census at midnight on July 15, the number of discharges, admissions, and additional patients (content loaded) throughout the day on July 15 and July 16.

Starting with the census at midnight on July 15 of 239, we subtract the number of discharges (59) and add the number of admissions (67) and additional patients (24) to get the total number of patients in the hospital on July 16.

239 - 59 + 67 + 24 = 271

Know more about census here:

https://brainly.com/question/28839458

#SPJ11

The 99% confidence interval for the mean mathematics SAT score for the entering freshman class is between 450 and 452.

 Based on the information provided, we can use the formula for a confidence interval for the population mean with a known standard deviation:

[tex]Confidence interval = sample mean +/- z*(standard deviation/square root of sample size)[/tex]

where z is the z-score corresponding to the desired confidence level (99% in this case).

Using a z-score table, we can find that the z-score for a 99% confidence level is 2.576.

Plugging in the values from the question, we get:

Confidence interval = 451 +/- 2.576*(0.115/sqrt(100))
Confidence interval = 451 +/- 0.029
Confidence interval = (450, 452)

Therefore, the 99% confidence interval for the mean mathematics SAT score for the entering freshman class is between 450 and 452 (rounded to the nearest whole number).

Learn more about mathematics here:

https://brainly.com/question/27235369

#SPJ11

The translation applied to the quadrilateral is (x, y) ---> (x + 1, y + 4)

Just look at one of the vertices of the two figures, then we can take the difference between the coordinate pairs and that will define the translation done, on the first figure we can see that we can see that:

K = (-2, -3)

And the translated vertex of the red figure is at K' = (-1, 1)

Taking the difference:

(-1, 1) - (-2, -3) = (1, 4)

So it moves 1 unit to the rigth and 4 units up, then the correct translation is.

(x, y) ---> (x + 1, y + 4)

Learn moer about translations at:

https://brainly.com/question/24850937

#SPJ1

The length of x in the secant intersection is 90.0 units.

If two secant segments intersect outside a circle, then the product of the measures of one secant segment and its external secant segment is equal to the product of the measures of the other secant segment and its external secant segment.

Therefore,

a(a + x) = b(b + c)

where

Hence,

11(11 + x) = 24.2(24.2 + 21.7)

121 + 11x = 585.64 + 525.14

121 + 11x = 1110.78

11x = 1110.78 - 121

11x = 989.78

divide both sides by 11

x = 989.78 / 11

x = 89.98

Therefore,

x = 90.0 units

learn more on secant here: https://brainly.com/question/23026602

#SPJ1

Answer:64

Step-by-step explanation:4x4x4=64

Answer:     3 million

Step-by-step explanation:

180 divided by 60 equals 3 so that would be 3 million because there are only 60 thousand and that would be a million because it would not be a billion.

Answer:D: 75.36 in

Step-by-step explanation: A= 3.14 x 12(2)

Alma has to utilize 6/5 glasses of blue paint and 6/5 mugs of ruddy paint with the 2 mugs of white paint to create 2 glasses of her favorite shade of purple paint.

To form 5 mugs of purple paint, Alma makes use of 3 mugs of blue paint, 1frac{1}{2} glasses of ruddy paint, and frac{1}{2} a container of white paint.

So, to form 1 container of purple paint, she has to utilize:

3/5 glasses of blue paint

1frac{1}{2}/5 cups of ruddy paint

frac{1}{2}/5 mugs of white paint

Presently, Alma needs to form 2 glasses of purple paint utilizing 2 glasses of white paint.

Since she already has frac{1}{2} a container of white paint, she as it were needs another 1frac{1}{2} mugs of white paint.

To form 2 glasses of purple paint, Alma must twofold the sum of each color utilized to create 1 glass of purple paint.

In this way, she will require:

2 * 3/5 = 6/5 glasses of blue paint

2 * 1frac{1}{2}/5 = 3/5 + 3/5 = 6/5 glasses of ruddy paint

2 * frac{1}{2}/5 = 1/5 cups of white paint

Since she as of now has 2 glasses of white paint, she will as it were ought to utilize 1/5 glasses of the white paint that she as of now has.

Subsequently, Alma has to utilize 6/5 glasses of blue paint and 6/5 mugs of ruddy paint with the 2 mugs of white paint to create 2 glasses of her favorite shade of purple paint.

Learn more about probability here: https://brainly.com/question/23417919

#SPJ1

Answer: -2

Step-by-step explanation:

f(4) is asking us that when x=4, what is the value of y?

Looking at the graph, you can tell that the point is: (4, -2)

Therefore, the answer is -2.

Two possible ways to write 9/10 as a sum of fractions are 1/2 + 4/5 and 3/5 + 3/10.

To write9/10 as a sum of  fragments, we need to find two  fragments with a common denominator that add up to9/10. One way to do this is to express9/10 as the sum of two  fragments with denominators that are multiples of 10.   One possible way to do this is   = 1/24/5   Both  fragments on the right- hand side have denominators that are multiples of 10, and when we add them together, we get9/10.

9 = 2x + y

We can then solve for x and y by trying different values until we find a solution that works. One possible solution is x=3 and y=3:

9/10 = 3/5 + 3/10

3/5 + 3/10 = 6/10 + 3/10 = 9/10

Since 9/10 is equal to 9/10, we have shown that 9/10 can be written as a sum of fractions.

Learn more about algebra at

https://brainly.com/question/29164011

#SPJ4

To prove that any postage of at least 12 cents can be obtained using 3 cents and 7 cents stamps, we will use mathematical induction.

First, let's check the base case. We need to show that it's possible to obtain a postage of 12 cents using 3 cents and 7 cents stamps. We can do this by using two 3 cents stamps and two 7 cents stamps, for a total of 12 cents.
Now, let's assume that it's possible to obtain any postage of at least 12 cents using 3 cents and 7 cents stamps. We want to prove that this also holds for postage values of n+1.
To do this, we need to show that it's possible to obtain a postage of n+1 cents using 3 cents and 7 cents stamps, assuming that we can already obtain any postage of at least 12 cents.
Let's consider the case where n+1 is an odd number. We can use one 7 cents stamp and (n-6)/2 3 cents stamps to obtain a postage of n+1 cents. This works because if n+1 is odd, then n-6 must be even, so we can divide it by 2 and use that many 3 cents stamps.
Now, let's consider the case where n+1 is an even number. We can use two 3 cents stamps and (n-8)/2 7 cents stamps to obtain a postage of n+1 cents. This works because if n+1 is even, then n-8 must be even, so we can divide it by 2 and use that many 7 cents stamps.
Therefore, we have shown that it's possible to obtain any postage of at least 12 cents using 3 cents and 7 cents stamps, and our proof is complete.

To use mathematical induction to prove that any postage of at least 12 cents can be obtained using 3 cents and 7 cents stamps, follow these steps:
Step 1: Base case
Show that the statement holds true for the smallest value (12 cents).
You can obtain 12 cents using four 3-cent stamps (3+3+3+3). So, the base case is true.
Step 2: Inductive hypothesis
Assume the statement is true for some arbitrary value 'k' (k >= 12) such that k can be obtained using 3 cents and 7 cents stamps.
Step 3: Inductive step
Prove the statement is true for the next value, 'k+1'. We need to show that (k+1) cents can also be obtained using 3 cents and 7 cents stamps.
Case 1: If the 'k' postage contains at least one 3-cent stamp, we can replace that with a 3-cent and a 3-cent stamp to obtain (k+1) cents.
Case 2: If the 'k' postage contains only 7-cent stamps, we have at least two 7-cent stamps since k >= 12. We can replace two 7-cent stamps with five 3-cent stamps (7+7 = 3+3+3+3+3), which adds up to the same postage value. In this case, we can obtain (k+1) cents by adding another 3-cent stamp.
In both cases, (k+1) cents can be obtained using 3 cents and 7 cents stamps. Therefore, by mathematical induction, any postage of at least 12 cents can be obtained using 3 cents and 7 cents stamps.

Visit here to learn more about mathematical induction:

brainly.com/question/29503103

#SPJ11

False. The statement you described is not an equivalent form for a conditional statement. The process you mentioned, which is reversing and negating the antecedent and consequent, is known as forming the contrapositive of the statement.

A conditional statement has the form "If P, then Q," where P is the antecedent and Q is the consequent. The contrapositive is formed by negating both the antecedent and consequent, and reversing their order: "If not Q, then not P." The contrapositive is equivalent to the original conditional statement.

However, simply reversing the antecedent and consequent without negating them gives you the converse, which is "If Q, then P." The converse is not equivalent to the original conditional statement.

To learn more about Antecedent - brainly.com/question/28845527

#SPJ11

Answer: The differential equation that models the weight of the baby bird is:

dR/dt = k (A - R)

where R is the weight of the bird at time t, A is the adult weight of the bird, and k is the proportionality constant.

To solve this differential equation, we can separate the variables and integrate both sides:

dR / (A - R) = k dt

ln|A - R| = -kt + C

|A - R| = e^(-kt+C)

|A - R| = Ce^(-kt)

where C is the constant of integration.

Since the initial weight of the bird is 20 grams, we have R(0) = 20. Plugging this into the above equation, we get:

|A - 20| = Ce^0

|A - 20| = C

Since C is a constant, we can use this to solve for it in terms of the adult weight A:

C = |A - 20|

Thus, the solution to the differential equation is:

|A - R| = |A - 20| e^(-kt)

To determine whether the bird is gaining weight faster when it weighs 40 grams or when it weighs 70 grams, we need to compare the rates of change of the weight at these two points.

When the weight of the bird is 40 grams, we have:

|A - R| = |A - 20| e^(-kt)

|A - 40| = |A - 20| e^(-kt)

Dividing both sides by |A - 20|, we get:

|A - 40| / |A - 20| = e^(-kt)

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

ln(|A - 40| / |A - 20|) = -kt

Similarly, when the weight of the bird is 70 grams, we have:

ln(|A - 70| / |A - 20|) = -kt

To compare the rates of change of the weight at these two points, we need to compare the absolute values of the slopes, which are given by the absolute values of the coefficients of t in the above equations:

|ln(|A - 40| / |A - 20|)| = k

|ln(|A - 70| / |A - 20|)| = k

Since k is positive, we can compare the absolute values of the logarithms to determine which weight corresponds to a faster rate of weight gain.

If ln(|A - 40| / |A - 20|) > ln(|A - 70| / |A - 20|), then the bird is gaining weight faster when it weighs 40 grams. If ln(|A - 40| / |A - 20|) < ln(|A - 70| / |A - 20|), then the bird is gaining weight faster when it weighs 70 grams.

Simplifying these expressions, we get:

ln(|A - 40| / |A - 20|) - ln(|A - 70| / |A - 20|) > 0

ln[(A - 40) / (A - 20)] - ln[(A - 70) / (A - 20)] > 0

ln[(A - 40) / (A - 70)] > 0

(A - 40) / (A - 70) > 1

A - 40 > A - 70

70 > 40

This inequality is true, so we can conclude that the bird is gaining weight faster when it weighs.

According to the given differential equation, the rate at which a baby bird gains weight is proportional to the difference between its adult weight and its current weight. Therefore, the rate of weight gain is higher when the bird weighs closer to its adult weight.

Assuming that the adult weight of the bird is greater than 70 grams, the bird is gaining weight faster when it weighs 70 grams as compared to when it weighs 40 grams. This is because the difference between the bird's current weight and its adult weight is greater when it weighs 70 grams as compared to when it weighs 40 grams. Thus, the rate of weight gain is higher when the bird weighs 70 grams.

To further clarify, let's consider the proportional constant k in the differential equation. We know that the rate of weight gain is given by dR/dt = k*(Adult weight - Current weight). As the adult weight is constant, k*(Adult weight - Current weight) is directly proportional to the difference between adult weight and current weight. When the bird weighs 40 grams, this difference is smaller as compared to when it weighs 70 grams, which means the rate of weight gain is slower. Therefore, the bird is gaining weight faster when it weighs 70 grams.

Learn more about weight here:

https://brainly.com/question/10069252

#SPJ11