Two new devices for testing blood sugar levels have been developed. How do these devices compare? You test blood sugar levels of 20 diabetics with both devices and usethe one-sample t test.the matched pairs t test.the two-sample t test.

3.77×10⁷ live more in California.

A word problem is a few sentences describing a 'real-life' scenario where a problem needs to be solved by way of a mathematical calculation.

This statements are interpreted into mathematical equation or expression.

There are 3.9 × 10⁷ people i.e 39000000 at California and 1.3× 10⁶ i.e 1300000 In main.

To know the difference between the two cities population, we subtract the population of main from California

Therefore ;

39000000 - 1300000

= 37700000

= 3.77×10⁷

therefore 3.77×10⁷ live more in California

learn more about word problem from

https://brainly.com/question/21405634

The equation with a degree of 4 and x-intercepts located at (-3,0), (7,0) and (-8,0) and a y-intercept located at (0,168) is y=(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x+1).

Explanation:

The given equation has x-intercepts located at (-3,0), (7,0) and (-8,0). This means that the factors of the equation must be (x+3), (x-7), and (x+8). Further, the y-intercept of the equation is located at (0,168), which means that the constant term in the equation must be 168.

Thus, the equation can be written as y = a(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x+b), where a and b are constants to be determined. To find the values of a and b, we can use the fact that the y-intercept of the equation is located at (0,168). Substituting x=0 and y=168 in the equation, we get:

168 = a(0+3)(0-7)(0+8)(0+b)

168 = -a378b

b = -3/2

Substituting this value of b in the equation, we get:

y = a(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2)

Now, to determine the value of a, we can use any of the given x-intercepts. Let's use the x-intercept (-3,0). Substituting x=-3 and y=0 in the equation, we get:

0 = a(-3+3)(-3-7)(-3+8)(-3-3/2)

0 = a*(-7)5(-9/2)

a = 0

Thus, the value of a is 0. Substituting this value of a in the equation, we get:

y = 0(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2)

y = (x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2)

Therefore, the equation with a degree of 4 and x-intercepts located at (-3,0), (7,0) and (-8,0) and a y-intercept located at (0,168) is y=(x+3)(x-7)(x+8)(x-3/2).

To learn more about y-intercept  click here, brainly.com/question/14180189

#SPJ11

The angles and coordinates of vectors are listed below:

Case A: θ = 0°, θ = 0 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (1, 0)

Case B: θ = 40°, θ = 2π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (0.766, 0.643)

Case C: θ = 80°, θ = 4π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (0.174, 0.985)

Case D: θ = 120°, θ = 2π / 3 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (- 0.5, 0.866)

Case E: θ = 160°, θ = 8π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (- 0.939, 0.342)

Case F: θ = 200°, θ = 10π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (- 0.939, - 0.342)

Case G: θ = 240°, θ = 4π / 3 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (- 0.5, - 0.866)

Case H: θ = 280°, θ = 14π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (0.174, - 0.985)

Case I: θ = 320°, θ = 16π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (0.766, - 0.643)

In this question we must determine the angles and coordinates of vectors within a geometric system consisting in a circle centered at a Cartesian plane. Angles and vectors can be found by means of the following definitions:

Angles - Degrees

θ = (n / 9) · 360°, for 0 ≤ n ≤ 8.

Angles - Radians

θ = (n / 9) · 2π, for 0 ≤ n ≤ 8.

Vector

(x, y) = r · (cos θ, sin θ)

Where r is the norm of the vector.

Now we proceed to determine the angles and vectors:

Case A (n = 0)

θ = 0°, θ = 0 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (1, 0)

Case B (n = 1)

θ = 40°, θ = 2π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (0.766, 0.643)

Case C (n = 2)

θ = 80°, θ = 4π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (0.174, 0.985)

Case D (n = 3)

θ = 120°, θ = 2π / 3 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (- 0.5, 0.866)

Case E (n = 4)

θ = 160°, θ = 8π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (- 0.939, 0.342)

Case F (n = 5)

θ = 200°, θ = 10π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (- 0.939, - 0.342)

Case G (n = 6)

θ = 240°, θ = 4π / 3 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (- 0.5, - 0.866)

Case H (n = 7)

θ = 280°, θ = 14π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (0.174, - 0.985)

Case I (n = 8)

θ = 320°, θ = 16π / 9 rad, (x, y) = 5 · (0.766, - 0.643)

To learn more on vectors: https://brainly.com/question/16063049

#SPJ1

The amount that must be paid each year to repay a $200,000 loan over 25 years at an interest rate of 4% compounded annually is approximately $12,057.

To calculate the amount that must be paid each year to repay the $200,000 loan over 25 years at an interest rate of 4% compounded annually, we can use the formula for the present value of an annuity. This formula is given as:

PV = PMT x ((1 - (1 + r/n)^(-nt))/(r/n))

where PV is the present value of the annuity (in this case, the loan amount), PMT is the payment made each period (which is what we want to calculate), r is the annual interest rate (4%), n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year (1, since it is compounded annually), and t is the number of periods (25 years).

Plugging in the values, we get:

$200,000 = PMT x ((1 - (1 + 0.04/1)^(-1*25))/(0.04/1))

Solving for PMT, we get:

PMT = $200,000 / ((1 - (1 + 0.04/1)^(-1*25))/(0.04/1))

PMT = $12,057 (rounded to the nearest dollar)

Therefore, the amount that must be paid each year to repay the $200,000 loan over 25 years at an interest rate of 4% compounded annually is approximately $12,057.

To learn more about present value of the annuity click here: brainly.com/question/30408707

#SPJ11

There are 24 possible outcomes  in the experiment

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

There are 6 faces in the die and 4 sections in the spinner

using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Face = 6

Sections = 4

The outcomes that are possible is calculated as

outcomes = Face * Sections

substitute the known values in the above equation, so, we have the following representation

outcomes = 6* 4

Evaluate

outcomes =24

Hence, there are 24 outcomes that are possible

Read more about sample size at

https://brainly.com/question/17203075

#SPJ1

The output of this code will be the critical value `z*` for an 80% confidence interval.

To find the critical value `z*` for an 80% confidence interval for a proportion, we need to use the standard normal distribution. The formula for the confidence interval for a proportion is:

```

p ± z* √(p*(1-p)/n)

```

where `p` is the sample proportion, `n` is the sample size, and `z*` is the critical value from the standard normal distribution.

We can find `z*` using the `qnorm()` function in R, which gives the inverse of the cumulative distribution function of the normal distribution. For an 80% confidence interval, we want to find the value of `z*` such that the area under the normal curve to the right of `z*` is 0.1 (since we want a two-tailed test, we need to divide the significance level of 0.2 by 2). This can be computed as follows:

```

z_star <- qnorm(0.1/2)

```

The output of this code will be the critical value `z*` for an 80% confidence interval.

Explanation:

The `qnorm()` function in R calculates the inverse of the cumulative distribution function (CDF) of the standard normal distribution. The CDF gives the probability that a standard normal random variable is less than or equal to a given value. By taking the inverse of the CDF at a given probability level, we can find the corresponding value on the standard normal distribution that has that probability to its left. For example, if we want to find the value of `z*` such that the area to the right of `z*` is 0.1, we can use the `qnorm()` function with the argument `1-0.1` (since the CDF gives the probability to the left of a value, and we want the area to the right). The resulting value is the critical value `z*` that we need for an 80% confidence interval.

Learn more about :

standard normal distribution : brainly.com/question/29509087

#SPJ11

The random variable "the number of cups of coffee sold in a cafeteria during lunch" is discrete.

This is because the variable can only take on integer values, such as 0, 1, 2, 3, and so on. It is not possible to sell a fraction of a cup of coffee, which is what would make it a continuous variable.

A discrete random variable has a finite or countably infinite number of possible outcomes, and each outcome has a non-zero probability.

In contrast, a continuous random variable can take on any value within a certain range, and the probabilities are described by a probability density function.

In this case, since the number of cups of coffee sold can only take on whole number values, it is a discrete random variable.

Know more about the random variable here:

https://brainly.com/question/17217746

#SPJ11

Jackie use the rule y = 3x+4.

Given that there is table giving the values of x and y,

The equation of a line is linear in the variables x and y which represents the relation between the coordinates of every point (x, y) on the line. i.e., the equation of line is satisfied by all points on it.

The equation of a line can be formed with the help of the slope of the line and a point on the line.

The slope of the line is the inclination of the line with the positive x-axis and is expressed as a numeric integer, fraction, or the tangent of the angle it makes with the positive x-axis.

The point refers to a point on the with the x coordinate and the y coordinate.

Considering the two points, (0, 4) and (1, 7),

By using these points, we will find the line by which the points are passing,

So, we know that equation of a line passing through two points is given by,

y - y₁ = y₂ - y₁ / x₂ - x₁ (x - x₁)

y - 4 = 7-4 / 1-0 (x - 0)

y - 4 = 3x

y = 3x+4

Hence Jackie use the rule y = 3x+4.

Learn more about equation of a line click;

https://brainly.com/question/21511618

#SPJ1

To determine the point estimate of the population proportion, we can take the midpoint of the confidence interval, which is (0.201 + 0.249) / 2 = 0.225.

To find the margin of error, we can use the formula:

margin of error = (upper bound - point estimate) / z*,

where z* is the z-score corresponding to the desired level of confidence. Let's assume a 95% confidence level, which corresponds to a z-score of 1.96.

margin of error = (0.249 - 0.225) / 1.96 = 0.0122

Therefore, the margin of error is approximately 0.0122.

Finally, we don't know the number of individuals in the sample with the specified characteristic, x, so we cannot determine this value.

Again, to determine the point estimate of the population proportion, we can take the midpoint of the confidence interval, which is (0.051 + 0.074) / 2 = 0.0625.

To find the margin of error, we can use the same formula as above:

margin of error = (upper bound - point estimate) / z*

Assuming a 95% confidence level:

margin of error = (0.074 - 0.0625) / 1.96 = 0.0059

Therefore, the margin of error is approximately 0.0059.

Finally, we don't know the number of individuals in the sample with the specified characteristic, x, so we cannot determine this value.

Visit here to learn more about population proportion brainly.com/question/15087042

#SPJ11

If the exchange rate were 5 Egyptian pounds per US dollar, a watch that costs $25 US dollars would cost 125 Egyptian pounds.

The exchange rate is the price at which one currency can be exchanged for another. In this case, the exchange rate is 5 Egyptian pounds per US dollar. This means that one US dollar can be exchanged for 5 Egyptian pounds.

To find out how much a watch that costs $25 US dollars would cost in Egyptian pounds, we need to multiply the cost in US dollars by the exchange rate:

$25 x 5 = 125 Egyptian pounds

Therefore, if the exchange rate were 5 Egyptian pounds per US dollar, a watch that costs $25 US dollars would cost 125 Egyptian pounds.

Learn more about exchange rate here:

brainly.com/question/17906368

#SPJ11

B. With test statistics of 2.40 and a critical value of 2.326, we fail to reject the null hypothesis. The manufacturer's claim cannot be rejected.

To test whether the sample information supports the manufacturer's claim that their 12-ounce cans do not contain more than 30 calories on average, we can use a one-sample t-test. The null hypothesis is that the true mean calorie content of the cans is equal to or less than 30 calories, while the alternative hypothesis is that it is greater than 30 calories.
Using the sample mean of 31.8 calories, the sample standard deviation of 3 calories, and a sample size of 16, we can calculate the t-value as follows:
t = (31.8 - 30) / (3 / √(16)) = 2.40
The degree of freedom for this test is 15 (n - 1). Using a significance level of alpha = 0.01 and a one-tailed test, the critical t-value is 2.602.
Comparing the calculated t-value of 2.40 to the critical t-value of 2.602, we can see that it falls within the non-rejection region. Therefore, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the sample information does not provide enough evidence to support the manufacturer's claim that their 12-ounce cans contain, on average, less than or equal to 30 calories. The correct answer is B: with test statistics of 2.40 and a critical value of 2.326, we failed to reject the null hypothesis. The manufacturer's claims cannot be rejected.

Learn more about evidence here:

https://brainly.com/question/15880833

#SPJ11

The possible number of real and imaginary roots for f(x) = 5x³-4x² + 20a - 16 is 3.

To determine the quantity of feasible rational superb and bad roots and the possible range of imaginary roots for the polynomial function:

f(x) = 5x³ - 4x² + 20a - 16

We can use the Rational Root Theorem and Descartes' Rule of Signs to analyze the equation.

Rational Root Theorem:

The Rational Root Theorem states that any rational root of a polynomial equation with integer coefficients ought to be in the shape p/q, in which p is a component of the constant time period and q is a thing of the main coefficient.

For the given polynomial f(x) = 5x³ - 4x² + 20a - sixteen, the regular time period is -16, and the leading coefficient is 5.

Factors of -sixteen: ±1, ±2, ±4, ±8, ±16

Factors of five: ±1, ±5

Possible rational positive roots: 1/1, 2/1, 4/1, 8/1, 16/1, 1/5, 2/5, 4/5, 8/5, 16/5

Possible rational negative roots: -1/1, -2/1, -4/1, -8/1, -16/1, -1/5, -2/5, -4/5, -8/5, -16/5

Note: The values of 'a' in the equation do not affect the viable rational roots considering that it is a regular time period.

Possible variety of imaginary roots:

According to the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra, a polynomial equation of diploma n will have precisely n complicated roots, which include each real and imaginary root. In this situation, the degree of the polynomial is three.

Therefore, the viable wide variety of imaginary roots for the equation is 3.

To know more about roots,

https://brainly.com/question/24147137

#SPJ1

In the expression, n is equal to  -1/3.

We have,

First, let's simplify the left side of the equation by distributing 1/4 to n and 1/4 to 7:

(1/4)n + (1/4)(7) = 5n - 7n + 1

Simplifying further by adding the like terms:

(1/4)n + 7/4 = -2n + 1

To get rid of the fraction, we can multiply both sides of the equation by 4:

4(1/4)n + 4(7/4) = 4(-2n + 1)

Simplifying:

n + 7 = -8n + 4

Bringing all the n terms to one side and all the constant terms to the other side:

n + 8n = 4 - 7

9n = -3

Dividing both sides by 9:

n = -1/3

Therefore,

In the expression, n is equal to  -1/3.

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ1

If 1472cm² of wrapping paper is needed to cover the smaller box, approximately 1672cm² of wrapping paper is needed to cover the larger box (assuming the surface area is directly proportional to the length).

Since the smaller and larger boxes have exactly the same shape, we can assume that their dimensions are proportional.

Let's denote the width and height of the smaller box as "w" and "h," respectively, and the width and height of the larger box as "W" and "H," respectively.

We know that the length of the smaller box is 16 cm, so we have:

Length of smaller box = 16 cm

Width of smaller box = w

Height of smaller box = h

To find the dimensions of the larger box, we can set up a proportion based on the lengths of the boxes:

16 cm / 18 cm = w / W

From this proportion, we can solve for W:

[tex]W = (18 cm \times w) / 16 cm[/tex]

Now, let's consider the surface area of the boxes.

The surface area of a box is given by the sum of the areas of its six faces. Since the boxes have the same shape, the ratio of their surface areas will be equal to the square of the ratio of their lengths:

Surface area of smaller box / Surface area of larger box = (16 cm / 18 cm)^2.

We know that the surface area of the smaller box is 1472 cm^2, so we can set up the equation:

[tex]1472 cm^2[/tex] / Surface area of larger box [tex]= (16 cm / 18 cm)^2[/tex]

To find the surface area of the larger box, we rearrange the equation:

[tex]Surface $area of larger box = 1472 cm^2 / [(16 cm / 18 cm)^2][/tex]

Now we can substitute the value of W into the equation to find the surface area of the larger box:

Surface area of larger box [tex]= 1472 cm^2 / [(16 cm / 18 cm)^2] = 1472 cm^2 / [(18 cm \times w / 16 cm)^2][/tex]

[tex]= 1472 cm^2 / [(18 \times w / 16)^2] = 1472 cm^2 / [(9w / 8)^2][/tex]

[tex]= 1472 cm^2 / [(81w^2 / 64)][/tex]

Simplifying further:

Surface area of larger box [tex]= (1472 cm^2 \times 64) / (81w^2)[/tex]

So the amount of wrapping paper needed to cover the larger box is given by the surface area of the larger box, which is:

[tex](1472 cm^2 \times 64) / (81w^2)[/tex]

Note that we don't have enough information to calculate the exact value of the wrapping paper needed to cover the larger box since we don't know the width "w" of the smaller box.

For similar question on proportional.

https://brainly.com/question/29738860

#SPJ11

Using the fact that we can make two similar triangles, we will see that x = 10.

The quotients between the two lengths of the sides of the triangle must be equal (this happens because the triangles are similar triangles), then we can write:

25/15 = (25 + x)/(15 + 6)

Now we can solve that equation for x:

25/15 = (25 + x)/21

25*21/15 = 25 + x

35 = 25 + x

35 - 25 = x

10 = x

The correct option is C.

Learn more about similar triangles at:

https://brainly.com/question/14285697

#SPJ1

The measures of angles of the kite are ∠JHL = 91°

Given data ,

Let the kite be represented as KLHJ

where the measure of angle ∠HLK = 128°

And , the measure of ∠JKL = 50°

Now , kites must have two sets of equivalent adjacent sides & one set of congruent opposite angles

So , the angles are

128° + 50° + 2x = 360°

On simplifying , we get

2x = 360° - 178°

2x = 182°

Divide by 2 on both sides , we get

x = 91°

Hence , the angle of kite is 91°

To learn more about kite click :

https://brainly.com/question/30482906

#SPJ1

The point on the curve y=tanh(x) at which the tangent has slope 16/25 is approximately (1.075, 0.789).

To find this point, we start by taking the derivative of y=tanh(x) to get y' = sech^2(x). We then set sech^2(x) equal to 16/25 and solve for x to get x = arccosh(sqrt(9/16)). This gives us the x-coordinate of the point on the curve where the tangent has slope 16/25. To find the corresponding y-coordinate, we evaluate y = tanh(arccosh(sqrt(9/16))) to get approximately 0.789. Therefore, the point on the curve where the tangent has slope 16/25 is approximately (1.075, 0.789).

Learn more about derivative here: brainly.com/question/3405774

#SPJ11

Answer: C

[tex]1,436.8ft^{3}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

First, find the radius:

r= d/2 ; d=diameter

r=(14)/2

r= 7ft

Then, find the volume of the sphere:

V= [tex]\frac{4}{3}[/tex][tex]\pi[/tex][tex]r^{3}[/tex]

 =  [tex]\frac{4}{3} \pi 7^{3}[/tex]

 =  [tex]\frac{4}{3} \pi 343[/tex]

 = [tex]1,436.8ft^{3}[/tex]  

The area under the normal curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 is approximately 0.0359, which corresponds to answer choice b.

The area under the normal curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 can be calculated using a standard normal distribution table or a calculator with a normal distribution function.

Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find the area under the curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 in the body of the table, where the rows represent the tenths and hundredths digits of z, and the columns represent the hundredths digits of the area.

Looking up z = 0.0, we find the area to be 0.5000. Looking up z = 1.79, we find the area to be 0.4641. To find the area between these two values, we can subtract the smaller area from the larger area:
0.4641 - 0.5000 = -0.0359

However, since we are looking for the area under the curve (which cannot be negative), we need to take the absolute value of this result:
| -0.0359 | = 0.0359

Therefore, the area under the normal curve between z = 0.0 and z = 1.79 is approximately 0.0359, which corresponds to answer choice b.

Know more about the area here:

https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ11

The difference in degrees of the two ramps is  = 5° - 10° = - 5°

The difference in degrees between the two ramps can be calculated by subtracting the steepness of the home ramp 10° from the steepness of the business ramp 5°

The difference in degrees = 5° - 10° = - 5°

The result is - 5°, indicating that the home ramp 5 degrees steeper than the business ramp. The negative sign implies that the home ramp exceeds the steepness limit set for the business ramp.

It's important to note that a negative difference in degrees doesint make practical sense in this context. The difference should be expressed as a positive value, so incase. we can say that the business ramp is 5 degrees less steep than the home ramp.

Learn more about ramp below.

https://brainly.com/question/30794715

#SPJ1

If we consider function f(0) and f(9), we have f(0) = (0 + 2) mod 11 = 2 and f(9) = (9 + 2) mod 11 = 0.

(a) False. The function f : Z → Z₁1 given by f(x) = (x + 2) mod 11 is not one-to-one. To justify this, we need to show that there exist two distinct elements in Z that map to the same element in Z₁1 under f. If we consider f(0) and f(9), we have f(0) = (0 + 2) mod 11 = 2 and f(9) = (9 + 2) mod 11 = 0. Since 2 and 0 are distinct elements in Z₁1, but they both map to the same element 0 in Z₁1 under f, the function is not one-to-one.

(b) True. The sets {{0}} and {{0}, 0} are equal. This can be justified by considering the definition of sets. In set theory, sets are defined by their elements, and duplicate elements within a set do not change its identity. Both {{0}} and {{0}, 0} contain the element 0. The set {{0}} has only one element, which is 0. The set {{0}, 0} also has only one element, which is 0. Therefore, both sets have the same element, and hence they are equal.

(c) True. If A x C = B x C and C is not an empty set, then A = B. This can be justified by considering the cancellation property of sets. Since C is not an empty set, there exists at least one element in C. Let's call this element c. Since A x C = B x C, it implies that for any element a in A and c in C, there exists an element b in B such that (a, c) = (b, c). By the cancellation property, we can cancel out the element c from both sides of the equation, giving us a = b. This holds for all elements in A and B, so we can conclude that A = B.

(d) False. The inverse of -4 modulo 17 is not 4. To find the inverse of -4 modulo 17, we need to find an integer x such that (-4 * x) mod 17 = 1. However, in this case, no such integer exists. If we calculate (-4 * 4) mod 17, we get (-16) mod 17 = 1, which shows that 4 is not the inverse of -4 modulo 17. In fact, the inverse of -4 modulo 17 does not exist, as there is no integer x that satisfies the equation.

Learn more about mod here:

https://brainly.com/question/32684026

#SPJ11

Skew lines are lines in three-dimensional space that do not intersect and are not parallel.

Unlike parallel lines, skew lines do not lie in the same plane. Instead, they are positioned at an angle to each other, which means they are neither perpendicular nor parallel. Because they do not intersect, they never meet, no matter how far they are extended. This property makes skew lines different from parallel lines, which can be extended infinitely far and remain equidistant from each other.

Learn more about skew lines here:

https://brainly.com/question/2603508

#SPJ1

In a Taylor series, the polynomial t3(x) represents the third degree Taylor polynomial of a function. It is an approximation of the function near a specific point, obtained by taking the first three terms of the Taylor series expansion.

The polynomial t3(x) is given by t3(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + (f''(a)/2!)(x-a)^2 + (f'''(a)/3!)(x-a)^3, where f(a) is the value of the function at the point a, f'(a) is its first derivative, f''(a) is its second derivative, and f'''(a) is its third derivative.

In the context of Taylor series, polynomial T3(x) refers to the third-degree Taylor polynomial. It is an approximation of a given function using the first four terms of the Taylor series expansion. The general formula for the Taylor series is:

f(x) ≈ f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + f''(a)(x-a)^2/2! + f'''(a)(x-a)^3/3! + ...

For T3(x), you'll consider the first four terms of the series:

T3(x) = f(a) + f'(a)(x-a) + f''(a)(x-a)^2/2! + f'''(a)(x-a)^3/3!

Here, f(a) represents the function value at the point 'a', and f'(a), f''(a), and f'''(a) represent the first, second, and third derivatives of the function evaluated at 'a', respectively. The T3(x) polynomial approximates the given function in the vicinity of the point 'a' up to the third degree.

Learn more about polynomial at: brainly.com/question/11536910

#SPJ11

The p-value for a right-tail hypothesis test in the t-distribution with 11 degrees of freedom and a test statistic of 2.201 is approximately 0.023.

In a hypothesis test, the p-value is the probability of obtaining a test statistic as extreme or more extreme than the observed one, assuming the null hypothesis is true. A smaller p-value indicates stronger evidence against the null hypothesis. In this case, since we are performing a right-tail test, we are interested in the probability of getting a t-value greater than 2.201. We can use a t-distribution table or a calculator to find that the corresponding area to the right of 2.201 with 11 degrees of freedom is approximately 0.023. Therefore, if the significance level (alpha) of the test is less than 0.023, we can reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the alternative hypothesis is supported.

Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/14309613

#SPJ11

When using the department allocation method for allocating overhead costs, there is typically one cost pool per department. This means that all the overhead costs associated with a particular department are combined into a single pool.

The department allocation method is one of several ways to allocate overhead costs to products or services. With this method, overhead costs are allocated based on the department or functional area that incurs them. For example, a manufacturing company might have separate departments for production, maintenance, and administration. Each of these departments incurs overhead costs such as rent, utilities, and supplies.

To use the department allocation method, the first step is to identify the cost pools associated with each department. This involves grouping all the overhead costs incurred by each department into a single pool. For instance, all the overhead costs incurred by the production department might be combined into a single production cost pool.

Once the cost pools have been established, the next step is to allocate them to the products or services produced by each department. This is typically done using a predetermined overhead rate, which is calculated by dividing the total overhead costs in a cost pool by a measure of activity, such as direct labor hours or machine hours. The predetermined overhead rate is then used to allocate overhead costs to each product or service based on the amount of activity it requires.

Overall, the department allocation method can be a useful way to allocate overhead costs in organizations that have multiple departments or functional areas. By grouping overhead costs into separate cost pools for each department, it becomes easier to identify the costs associated with each area of the organization and to allocate those costs fairly to the products or services that each department produces.

Learn more about Single:

brainly.com/question/30983118

#SPJ11

The slope of the line is a positive slope. The value of the slope is 2/3.

From the question, we are to determine if the slope of the line is positive, negative, undefined, or zero

First, we will calculate the slope of the line ,

Using the formula,

Slope = (y₂ - y₁) / (x₂ - x₁)

Pick two points: (0, -3) and (3, -1)

Thus,

Slope = (-1 - (-3)) / (3 - 0)

Slope = (-1 + 3)) / (3)

Slope = (2) / (3)

Slope = 2/3

Since the value of the slope is positive, the slope is a positive slope.

Hence,

The slope is positive.

Learn more on Slope here: brainly.com/question/29044610

#SPJ1

If mean of "non-conforming" units is 1.6, then probability that sample will contain 2 or less "non-conforming" units using Poisson-distribution is 0.7833.

The Average(mean) of non-conforming units is = 1.6,

So, the probability function using, poisson-distribution is written as :

P(X) = ([tex]e^{-1.6}[/tex]×1.6ˣ)/x!,   for x=0,1,2,3,...

We have to find probability that sample will contain 2 or less nonconforming units, which means P(X≤2),

So, P(X≤2) = P(X=0) + P(X=1) +P(X=2),

So, P(X=0) = ([tex]e^{-1.6}[/tex]×1.6⁰)/0! = 0.2019,

P(X=1) = ([tex]e^{-1.6}[/tex]×1.6¹)/1! = 0.3230,

P(X=2) = ([tex]e^{-1.6}[/tex]×1.6²)/2! = 0.2584,

Substituting the values, in P(X≤2),

We get,

P(X≤2) = 0.2019 + 0.3230 + 0.2584

P(X≤2) = 0.2019 + 0.3230 + 0.2584

P(X≤2) = 0.7833.

Therefore, the required probability is 0.7833.

Learn more about Probability here

https://brainly.com/question/31603869

#SPJ4

The given question is incomplete, the complete question is

If the average number of nonconforming units is 1.6, what is the probability that a sample will contain 2 or less nonconforming units? Use Poisson distribution.

The height of the trapezoid is 98 units

The space enclosed by the boundary of a plane figure is called its area.

A trapeziod is a closed shape or a polygon, that has four sides, four corners/vertices and four angles

The area of a trapezoid is expressed as;

A = 1/2( a+b)h

where a and b are the bases length of the trapezoid.

245= 1/2 ( 14+21)h

490 = 35h

divide both sides by 35

h = 490/35

h = 98 units

Therefore the height of the trapezoid is 98 units

learn more about area of trapezoid from

https://brainly.com/question/1410008

#SPJ1

(a) The selling price is $6.25.

(b)  The net profit is the difference between the selling price and the cost is $4.35.

(c)  The cost is $1.90.

We have,

Let's denote the cost of producing one bag of corn chips as "C", the selling price as "S", and the net profit as "P".

We can then use the given information to set up the following equations:

Overhead percent = 20% of the selling price

=> 0.2S = $1.25

Markup = Selling price - Cost

=> $4.35 = S - C

We can solve these two equations simultaneously to find the values of S and C:

0.2S = $1.25

=> S = $6.25 (dividing both sides by 0.2)

$4.35 = S - C

=> $4.35 = $6.25 - C (substituting the value of S)

=> C = $1.90 (subtracting $4.35 from both sides)

(a)

The selling price is $6.25.

(b)

The net profit is the difference between the selling price and the cost:

P = S - C

= $6.25 - $1.90

= $4.35.

(c)

The cost is $1.90.

Thus,

(a) The selling price is $6.25.

(b)  The net profit is the difference between the selling price and the cost is $4.35.

(c)  The cost is $1.90.

Learn more about equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ1

To find the length of the curve described by the parametric equations, we use the formula. Therefore, the exact length of the curve described by the parametric equations is 16√17 - 2/3 units.

L = ∫[a, b] sqrt[(dx/dt)^2 + ( dy/dt)^2] dt

where a and b are the bounds of the parameter t.

Using the given parametric equations, we have:

x(t) = 8 + 3t^2

y(t) = 7 + 2t^3

Taking the derivatives with respect to t, we have:

dx/dt = 6t

dy/dt = 6t^2

Substituting these expressions into the formula for L, we get:

L = ∫[0,4] sqrt[(6t)^2 + (6t^2)^2] dt

= ∫[0,4] sqrt[36t^2 + 36t^4] dt

= ∫[0,4] 6t sqrt(1 + t^2) dt

To evaluate this integral, we use the substitution u = 1 + t^2, du/dt = 2t, and dt = du/2t. This gives:

L = ∫[1,17] 3 sqrt(u) du

= 2[u^(3/2)/3]∣[1,17]

= 2[(17^(3/2) - 1^(3/2))/3]

= 2(8√17 - 1/3)

Therefore, the exact length of the curve described by the parametric equations is 16√17 - 2/3 units.

Visit here to learn more parametric equations:

brainly.com/question/28537985

#SPJ11