URGENT PLEASE HELP I’M TRYING TO GET MY GRADE TO A C OR B!!!
Solve for c.

(c+9)^2=64


Responses

c=−17, c=−1
c equals negative 17, , , c equals negative 1

​c=−73−−√, c=73−−√​
​, c equals negative square root of 73 , c equals square root of 73 ​

c=−55−−√, c=55−−√
c equals negative square root of 55, , , c equals square root of 55

c = 1, c = 17

The slope for the fitted line for the Male group is 9 + 4*X1, where X1 is the value of the continuous variable for the Male group. The coefficient of Male*X1 in the equation indicates the change in slope for the Male group compared to the slope for the non-Male group.

To find the slope of the fitted line for the Male group, you need to consider the given equation:

Yhat = 100 + 9X1 + 9Male + 4Male*X1

Since Male is a 0/1 variable, we assign a value of 1 for the Male group:

Yhat = 100 + 9X1 + 9(1) + 4(1)*X1

Now, simplify the equation:

Yhat = 100 + 9X1 + 9 + 4X1

Combine the terms with the continuous variable X1:

Yhat = 100 + 9X1 + 4X1 + 9

Yhat = 100 + 13X1 + 9

The slope of the fitted line for the Male group is the coefficient of the continuous variable X1, which is 13.

Learn more about continuous variables here:- brainly.com/question/22098213

#SPJ11

Probability is the study of the chances of occurrence of a result, which are obtained by the ratio between favorable cases and possible cases.

To find the probability of (a or b), we can use the formula:

P(a or b) = P(a) + P(b) - P(a and b)

Plugging in the given values:

P(a or b) = 0.21 + 0.35 - 0.12

= 0.44

Therefore, the probability of (a or b) is 0.44.

learn about probability,

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

(i) The number of infected plants among 5 plants follows a binomial distribution with parameters n = 5 and p.

We observed 4 infected plants. To determine the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data, we need to calculate the probabilities of 4 and 5 infected plants for a range of values of p and add them up.

The probability of 4 infected plants is:

P(X = 4) = 5C4 * p^4 * (1-p)^1 = 5p^4 * (1-p)

The probability of 5 infected plants is:

P(X = 5) = 5C5 * p^5 * (1-p)^0 = p^5

Therefore, the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data is:

P(X >= 4) = P(X = 4) + P(X = 5) = 5p^4 * (1-p) + p^5

(ii) To determine if p = 0.3 or p = 0.2 lie within the 95% confidence interval, we need to find the range of values of p such that the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data is less than or equal to 0.025. We can solve this numerically using the expression derived in part (i):

For p = 0.3:

P(X >= 4) = 5(0.3)^4 * (1-0.3) + (0.3)^5 = 0.0765

Since 0.0765 > 0.025, we cannot conclude that p = 0.3 lies within the 95% confidence interval.

For p = 0.2:

P(X >= 4) = 5(0.2)^4 * (1-0.2) + (0.2)^5 = 0.01024

Since 0.01024 < 0.025, we can conclude that p = 0.2 lies within the 95% confidence interval.

(iii) If we observed five infected plants out of five, then the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data is simply P(X = 5) = p^5. To determine if p = 0.3 lies within the 95% confidence interval, we need to find the range of values of p such that the probability of observing five infected plants is less than or equal to 0.025:

p^5 <= 0.025

p <= (0.025)^(1/5)

p <= 0.551

Since 0.3 < 0.551, we can conclude that p = 0.3 does not lie within the 95% confidence interval.

(i) The number of infected plants among 5 plants follows a binomial distribution with parameters n = 5 and p. We observed one infected plant. To determine if p = 0.6 or p = 0.7 lie within the 95% confidence interval, we need to find the range of values of p such that the probability of a result at least as extreme as the observed data (i.e., zero or one infected plants) is less than or equal to 0.025:

For p = 0.6:

P(X <= 1) = P(X = 0) + P(X = 1) = (0.4)^5 + 5(0.6)(0.4)^4 = 0.07808

Since 0.07808 > 0.025, we cannot conclude that p = 0.6

Visit here to learn more about binomial distribution brainly.com/question/31197941

#SPJ11

Best Buy's expected value on the warranty is $1.25.

To calculate Best Buy's expected value on the warranty, we need to consider the potential outcomes and their probabilities.

If the customer doesn't return the item for a claim on the warranty, Best Buy receives $25 for the warranty but doesn't have to pay anything out. The probability of this happening is 95% (100% - 5%).

If the customer does return the item for a claim on the warranty, Best Buy has to refund the $250 purchase price but received $25 for the warranty. The probability of this happening is 5%.

So, to calculate the expected value, we can multiply the probability of each outcome by its value and add them together:

(0.95 x $25) + (0.05 x -$250) = $1.25

Know more about expected value here:

https://brainly.com/question/29574962

#SPJ11

By arranging the population in a systematic pattern where every kth element has the same value, we ensure that the variance of the 1-in-k systematic sample mean is 0.

To construct a population such that V(īsy) = 0 for 1-in-k systematic sampling, we need to ensure that the population variance is evenly distributed throughout the sample. This can be achieved by selecting a population where the variability within each kth interval is the same.

For example, if we have a population of 1000 individuals, we can divide it into intervals of 10. Within each interval, we can ensure that the variance is the same by selecting individuals with similar characteristics or attributes. This ensures that when we take a 1-in-k systematic sample, the variance within each interval remains the same, resulting in V(īsy) = 0.

It is important to note that systematic sampling is a type of probability sampling where every kth individual is selected from the population. This method is often used when the population is large and spread out, and random sampling is not feasible. However, it is important to ensure that the systematic sampling is truly random and not biased towards any particular group within the population.

To construct a population where the variance of the 1-in-k systematic sample mean (V(īsy)) equals 0, we need to make sure that the sample means are the same for all possible systematic samples.

Step 1: Choose a population size, N, and a sampling interval, k. For simplicity, let's select N=12 and k=3.

Step 2: Arrange the population elements in a systematic pattern. Since we want the variance of the systematic sample mean to be 0, we'll arrange the elements such that every kth element has the same value. For example:

Population: 5, 2, 7, 5, 2, 7, 5, 2, 7, 5, 2, 7

Step 3: Perform 1-in-k systematic sampling. With k=3, we'll take every 3rd element starting from the first element:

Sample 1: 5, 5, 5, 5 (Mean: 5)
Sample 2: 2, 2, 2, 2 (Mean: 2)
Sample 3: 7, 7, 7, 7 (Mean: 7)

Step 4: Verify that V(īsy) = 0. The variance of the sample means is 0, as they are all equal for each possible systematic sample. Therefore, V(īsy) = 0 for this population.

In summary, by arranging the population in a systematic pattern where every kth element has the same value, we ensure that the variance of the 1-in-k systematic sample mean is 0.

Learn more about sampling at: brainly.com/question/12902833

#SPJ11

The requried linear function, slope, and time are y = 502x + 18272, m=502 and 21 months respectively.

We have the following data:

x y

18 27308

27 31826

Using the formula for slope, we have:

m = (31826 - 27308) / (27 - 18)

m = 502

Therefore, the slope of the linear function is 502. This means that for every month that Jeffrey owns the SUV, the odometer reading increases by an average of 502 miles.

To find the y-intercept (b) and complete the linear function, we can use one of the data points and the slope. Let's use the first data point (18, 27308):

27308 = 502(18) + b

b = 18272

Therefore, the linear function that represents the relationship between the odometer reading and time is:

y = 502x + 18272

To find how long it took for the odometer to read 28,814 miles, we can plug in 28,814 for y and solve for x:

28,814 = 502x + 18272

x = 21

Therefore, it took 21 months for the odometer to read 28,814 miles.

Learn more about linear functions here:

https://brainly.com/question/20286983

#SPJ1

B. The statement is false. The transpose of the product of two matrices is the product of the transposes of the individual matrices in reverse order, or (AB)^T=B^TA^T.

Justification:
1. Let A and B be arbitrary matrices for which the product AB is defined.
2. To find the transpose of the product (AB)^T, we need to first understand the properties of transposes.
3. According to the property of transposes, (AB)^T is equal to the product of the transposes of the individual matrices in reverse order.
4. So, (AB)^T = B^TA^T, which contradicts the statement (AB)^T = A^TB^T.

Hence, the correct answer is option B.

Learn more about Matrices here: brainly.com/question/11367104

#SPJ11

The value of f ( -1 ) when evaluated is C. 1

The value of f ( - 4 ) would be A. -2

The value of x would be B. 1.7.

The question asking to evaluate f ( -1  ) is basically asking for the value of y, when the line on the graph is at the value of x in the bracket. The value of y at - 1 is 1. By this same notion, the value of y when x is - 4, according to the graph, is - 2.

The value of x however, when given f (x) = 3 would then be the value on the graph, when y is 3. We can see that this value is 1. 7.

Find out more on graphs at https://brainly.com/question/24495196

#SPJ1

Answer:(94-7a)

Step-by-step explanation:

if 69 ate ur mom

The equation that represent the average price of a house as a function of the year can be presented as follows;

The average of a value, such as the average price of a houses is the ratio between the sum of the prices of the houses to the number of houses.

The average cost of a family house in 1997 = $156,100

The average cost of the family house in 2010 = $254,400

The equation for the price (p) of a house as a function of the year, t where t = 0 corresponds to 1997, can be found as follows;

The slope of the equation is; (254,400 - 156,100)/(2010 - 1997) = 98300/13

98300/13 = 7561 7/13

The linear equation is therefore;
p - 156100 = (98300/13) × (t - 0)

p = (98300/13) × t + 156100

p = (7561 7/13) × t + 156100

The average price of a house today, 2023 can be found by plugging in the value, t = 2023 - 1997 = 26 in the above equation as follows;

p = (98300/13) × 26 + 156100 = 352,700

The price of a house today is $352,700

Learn more on linear equations here: https://brainly.com/question/2030026

#SPJ1

An example of a triangle with the same area as the shaded rectangle has been attached in the folder below.

Looking at the shaded diagram, we can tell that the rectangle has a length of 4cm and a width of 2 cm. The area of a rectangle can be calculated by the formula A = L x W, This amounts to 8 cm.

The area of a triangle can be calculated by multiplying the base by the height and then dividing by two. The formula is: A = 1/2 x base x height.

However, since we know the area of the rectangle is 8cm, we can decide that the height is 4cm and base 4 cm. it becomes 4 x 4 x 1/2 = 8

Find more exercises on area of triangle;

https://brainly.com/question/27683633

#SPJ1

For having to pay the same amount for both memberships and walk-in classes, if memberships cost $51 per month for unlimited classes and walk-ins charge $3 per class, one has to attend classes and pay $51 as the total amount.

Let the number of classes that are attended be x

If the same amount is paid for unlimited membership classes and walk=in classes, then we get the following equation:

Membership cost = cost of walk-in classes = $51

Cost of walk-in classes = 3x

Thus, we get the following equation.

51 = 3x

x = 17

Thus, the number of classes attended is 17 and the final amount paid is $51.

Learn more about equations:

https://brainly.com/question/28871326

#SPJ4

A true statement about contextual interference is: it is high if a practice schedule involves a random arrangement of trials.

Contextual interference is a phenomenon in motor learning where practicing multiple variations of a task in a random or mixed order results in interference or disruption during learning. The interference caused by practicing in a mixed order appears to be counterintuitive, as it creates a challenge for the learner to constantly switch between different task variations. However, this interference has been shown to lead to better long-term retention of the learned skill.

The reason why contextual interference works is related to the way our brains process and consolidate information. When we practice a motor skill in a blocked or consistent order, our brains can quickly and easily memorize the movements required for that skill. However, this type of learning tends to be shallow, and the skill is not retained as well over time. In contrast, when we practice a skill in a random or mixed order, our brains have to work harder to distinguish between the different variations of the task. This additional processing load strengthens the neural connections underlying the skill, leading to more durable and flexible memory representations.

To know more about contextual interference,

https://brainly.com/question/29107679

#SPJ11

The volume of the cuboids and triangular prisms are:

d). 2139 cm³, e). 1.6 mm³, f). 1428.84 m³, g). 264 yd³, and h). 96 m³

Volume of cuboid = length × width × height

d). 15.5 cm × 9.2 cm × 15 cm = 2139 cm³

e). 2 mm × 0.8 mm × 1 mm = 1.6 mm³

f). 6.3 m × 6.3 m × 3.6 m = 1428.84 m³

Volume of triangular prism = base area × height

g). 11 yd × 6 yd × 4 yd = 264 yd³

h). 4 m × 4 m × 6 m = 96 m³

Therefore, the volume of the cuboids and triangular prisms are:

d). 2139 cm³, e). 1.6 mm³, f). 1428.84 m³, g). 264 yd³, and h). 96 m³

Read more about volume here:https://brainly.com/question/46030

#SPJ1

The other end point of the line segment is (-11, 6)

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

Midpoint = (-4, 7)

Endpoint 1 = (3, 8)

Represent the other point with (x, y)

using the above as a guide, we have the following:

Midpoint = 1/2(x1 + x2, y1 + y2)

So, we have

1/2(x + 3, y + 8) = (-4, 7)

This gives

(x + 3, y + 8) = (-8, 14)

Evaluate

(x, y) = (-11, 6)

Hence, the other point is (-11, 6)

Read more about midpoint at

https://brainly.com/question/25886396

#SPJ1

Answer:

392.69908169872 feet3

Step-by-step explanation:

1/3πr^2h

1/3π*5^2*15

125π

392.69908169872 feet3

The missing side of triangle is 11.66 cm, under the condition that the given triangle is a right angled triangle and the other sides of the triangle are 10cm, 6cm respectively.

In order to evaluate the other side of the triangle, we have to rely on the principles of Pythagorean Theorem which states that in a right triangle, the sum of the square sides are equal to the square of the hypotenuse side.

Then, let us consider that x be the length of the missing side then

x² = 10² + 6²

x² = 100 + 36

x² = 136

x = √(136)

x ≈ 11.66 cm

Then, the missing side of this triangle is approximately 11.66 cm.

To learn more about right angle triangle

https://brainly.com/question/29869536

#SPJ4

The complete question is

Find the missing siside of the following right triangle in the figure





The statistical measures for the given set of data are:

Population size: 8

Median: 10

Minimum: 7

Maximum: 14

First quartile: 7.25

Third quartile: 12.75

Interquartile Range: 5.5

Outliers: none

The statistical measures for the given set of data are:

Mean: (7+7+8+9+11+12+13+14)/8 = 10.125

Median: 10

Mode: 7 (since it appears twice)

Range: 14-7 = 7

Variance: 6.625

Standard deviation: √(6.625) = 2.6

To create a box and whiskers plot, we first need to order the data set from smallest to largest:

7, 7, 8, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14

To find the quartiles, we need to find the median (which we already know is 10), and then find the median of the lower half and upper half of the data set separately:

Lower half: 7, 7, 8, 9

Upper half: 11, 12, 13, 14

The median of the lower half is (7+8)/2 = 7.5, and the median of the upper half is (12+13)/2 = 12.5.

Therefore, the quartiles are:

Q1 = 7.25

Q2 (median) = 10

Q3 = 12.75

To find the range of values within 1.5 times the IQR, we first calculate the IQR:

IQR = Q3 - Q1 = 12.5 - 7.5 = 5

Then, we calculate the lower and upper bounds:

Lower bound = Q1 - 1.5IQR = 7.5 - 1.55 = 0

Upper bound = Q3 + 1.5IQR = 12.5 + 1.55 = 20

Since all of the observations fall within the bounds, there are no outliers in this data set.

Using this information, we can create a box and whiskers plot as follows:

To learn more about the box-and-whisker plot ;

https://brainly.com/question/2742784

#SPJ1

Solving a system of equations we can see that the two positive numbers are x = 10 and y = 5.

Let's say that the two numbers are x and y, then we can write the system of equations:

x² + y² = 125

x² - y² = 75

We can isolate x² in the second equation to get:

x² = 75 + y²

And replace that in the first one, then:

75 + y² + y² = 125

2y² = 125 - 75

2y² = 50

y² = 50/2

y² = 25

y = √25 = 5

And now let's find the value of x:

x² = 75 + y²

x² = 75 + 25

x² = 100

x = √100 = 10

These are the two numbers.

Learn moer about systems of equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/13729904

#SPJ1

The margin of error for the 90% confidence interval is 5.84

To find the margin of error for a 90% confidence interval, we will use the given information and the z-score table provided.

1. Identify the z-score for a 90% confidence level: Since the confidence level is 90%, there is 10% left in the tails. Divide this by 2 to find the area in each tail, which is 5%. Look for the z-score associated with 0.05 in the table provided. The z-score is 1.645.

2. Find the standard error: The standard error is calculated as the population standard deviation (σ) divided by the square root of the sample size (n). In this case, σ = 21 and n = 35.

Standard Error (SE) = σ / √n = 21 / √35 ≈ 3.55

3. Calculate the margin of error: The margin of error (ME) is calculated by multiplying the z-score by the standard error.

ME = z-score * SE = 1.645 * 3.55 ≈ 5.84

4. Round the final answer to two decimal places: 5.84

To learn more about standard deviation : brainly.com/question/13905583

#SPJ11

.

using the appropriate derivative or partial derivative(s) of t (v comma d )at the point (90 comma 30 )to estimate how the depth of the dive would have to change in order to compensate for a decrease of 5 liters of air in the tank if you still wish to dive for 47.143 minutes is :

Δd ≈ (t* - T(v*, d*)) / (∂T/∂d)

Without additional information or context, it's not clear what the variables v and d represent, so we can't provide a specific answer to this question.

However, in general, if we have a function T(v, d) that gives us the time that we can spend diving with a tank of air that has volume v and a depth of d, we can use the total derivative to estimate how the depth d needs to change in order to compensate for a decrease of Δv liters of air, while keeping the dive time fixed at a certain value t*. The total derivative is given by:

dT ≈ (∂T/∂v)Δv + (∂T/∂d)Δd

where (∂T/∂v) and (∂T/∂d) are the partial derivatives of T with respect to v and d, evaluated at a specific point (v*, d*).

To estimate the change in depth needed to compensate for a decrease of Δv liters of air while keeping the dive time fixed at t*, we can set d = d* and solve for Δd:

dT ≈ (∂T/∂v)Δv + (∂T/∂d)Δd

Δd ≈ (t* - T(v*, d*)) / (∂T/∂d)

In our case, we need to evaluate this formula at the point (90, 30) and with a decrease of Δv = 5 liters of air, and we need to use the appropriate partial derivatives of T(v, d) with respect to v and d. However, without more information about the function T(v, d), we cannot provide a specific answer to this question.

To know more about partial derivatives, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31397807

#SPJ11

These values are based on the t-distribution table and represent critical values for the given probabilities and degrees of freedom.

To answer this question, we need to use a t-table. The values we are looking for are the t-values associated with specific probabilities and degrees of freedom.

(a) t0.10, 10 = 1.372 (from the t-table, using 10 degrees of freedom and the probability of 0.10)

(b) t0.05, 10 = 1.812 (from the t-table, using 10 degrees of freedom and the probability of 0.05)

(c) t0.05, 21 = 1.721 (from the t-table, using 21 degrees of freedom and the probability of 0.05)

(d) t0.05, 60 = 1.671 (from the t-table, using 60 degrees of freedom and the probability of 0.05)

(e) t0.005, 60 = 2.660 (from the t-table, using 60 degrees of freedom and the probability of 0.005)

Note that we round all answers to three decimal places, as specified in the question. The values we have found are the t-values for the specified probabilities and degrees of freedom. These values can be used in calculations involving t-distributions.

Learn more about values here:

https://brainly.com/question/30145972

#SPJ11

The number of mezzanine tickets that were sold is: 540

Let the regular seats be x

Let the mezzanine seats be y

Thus:

x + y = 910   -----(1)

18.50x + 16.25y = 15620   -----(2)

From eq 1,

y = 910 - x

Thus:

18.50x + 16.25(910 - x) = 15620

18.50x + 14,787.5 - 16.25x = 15620

2.25x = 15620 - 14,787.5

2.25x = 832.5

x = 832.5/2.25

x = 370 tickets

Thus:

y = 910 - 370

y = 540 tickets

Read more about Simultaneous Linear Equations at: https://brainly.com/question/26310043

#SPJ1

Answer: hortest side of the triangle is 24 units.

Step-by-step explanation: To solve for the shortest side of a triangle, we first need to simplify the given equation:

s + s + 8 - 18 = 38

Combining like terms, we get:

2s - 10 = 38

Adding 10 to both sides, we get:

2s = 48

Dividing by 2, we get:

s = 24

Therefore, the value of the shortest side of the triangle is 24 units.

Using a standard normal distribution table, we can find the p-value associated with this test statistic, which is extremely small (less than 0.0001). This means that if the true fraction defective is indeed 0.05 or less, the probability of getting a sample proportion of 0.02 or less is very low.

Since the p-value is less than the significance level of alpha = 0.05, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the process is not capable at the customer's required level of quality. The manufacturer cannot demonstrate process capability for the customer based on this sample.

To determine if the manufacturer can demonstrate process capability for the customer, we need to perform a hypothesis test.

The null hypothesis is that the true fraction defective in the population is equal to or less than 0.05 (i.e., the process is capable), while the alternative hypothesis is that the true fraction defective is greater than 0.05 (i.e., the process is not capable).

Using the given sample size of 200 and 4 defects, we can calculate the sample proportion of defects as 0.02. We can then use this to calculate the test statistic, which in this case is a one-sample proportion z-test:

z = (p - P) / sqrt(P(1-P) / n)

where p is the sample proportion, P is the hypothesized proportion (0.05), and n is the sample size. Plugging in the values, we get:

z = (0.02 - 0.05) / sqrt(0.05(1-0.05) / 200) = -4.4

Know more about hypothesis test here:

https://brainly.com/question/30588452

#SPJ11

The null hypothesis is that the true average age of the sporting goods store's customers is equal to or less than 39. The alternative hypothesis is that the true average age is greater than 39.

To test this hypothesis, we can use a one-sample t-test. The t-statistic for this sample is (41.3-39)/(7/sqrt(43)) = 3.06. With 42 degrees of freedom (43-1), the critical value for a one-tailed test with alpha=0.10 is 1.684. Since 3.06 > 1.684, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence to suggest that the true average age of the store's customers is greater than 39.

Know more about null hypothesis here:

https://brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The simplification of the given expression, [tex]\sqrt{\frac{2^{x+2} + 2^{x}}{2^{x-3}} + 9}[/tex], is 7

From the question, we are to simplify the given expression

The given expression is

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{2^{x+2} + 2^{x}}{2^{x-3}} + 9}[/tex]

The expression can be simplified as follows:

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{2^{x+2} + 2^{x}}{2^{x-3}} + 9}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{2^{x} \times 2^{2} + 2^{x}}{2^{x} \div 2^{3}} + 9}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{2^{x} (2^{2} + 1)}{2^{x} \times \frac{1}{2^{3}}} + 9}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{(2^{2} + 1)}{ \frac{1}{2^{3}}} + 9}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{(4 + 1)}{ \frac{1}{8}} + 9}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{\frac{(5)}{ \frac{1}{8}} + 9}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{(5) \div \frac{1}{8} + 9}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{(5) \times \frac{8}{1} + 9}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{5 \times 8+ 9}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{40+ 9}[/tex]

[tex]\sqrt{49}[/tex]

= 7

Hence, the simplified expression is 7

Learn more on Simplifying an expression here: https://brainly.com/question/723406

#SPJ1

Answer: The general form of a sine function is:

y = A sin (Bx + C) + D

Where:

A = amplitude

B = 2π/period

C = phase shift

D = vertical shift or midline

Given the values in the problem, we can substitute and simplify:

A = 3

midline = 2, so D = 2

period = 8π/7, so B = 2π/(8π/7) = 7/4

y = 3 sin (7/4 x + C) + 2

To find the phase shift, we need to use the fact that the sine function is at its maximum when the argument of the sine function is equal to π/2. That is:

Bx + C = π/2

We can solve for C:

C = π/2 - Bx

C = π/2 - (7/4) x

Substituting back the value of C in the equation, we get:

y = 3 sin (7/4 x + π/2 - 7/4 x) + 2

y = 3 sin (7/4 x - 7π/8) + 2

Therefore, the sine function with an amplitude of 3, a midline of y=2, and a period of 8π/7 is:

y = 3 sin (7/4 x - 7π/8) + 2

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The test statistic is 8.93 and the p-value is less than 0.0001 (or 0.05% significance level). Therefore, there is sufficient evidence to support the claim that men have a higher rate of red/green color blindness than women. The answer is A. Yes.

To test the claim that men have a higher rate of red/green color blindness than women, we can use a two-sample proportion test.
The null hypothesis is that the proportion of men with red/green color blindness is equal to the proportion of women with red/green color blindness. The alternative hypothesis is that the proportion of men with red/green color blindness is greater than the proportion of women with red/green color blindness.
The test statistic for this hypothesis test is:
z = (p1 - p2) / sqrt(pooled proportion * (1 - pooled proportion) * (1/n1 + 1/n2))
where p1 is the proportion of men with red/green color blindness, p2 is the proportion of women with red/green color blindness, n1 is the sample size of men, n2 is the sample size of women, and pooled proportion is the weighted average of the two sample proportions:
pooled proportion = (x1 + x2) / (n1 + n2)
where x1 and x2 are the total number of men and women with red/green color blindness, respectively.
Plugging in the values given in the problem, we get:
p1 = 50/550 = 0.0909
p2 = 8/2950 = 0.0027
n1 = 550
n2 = 2950
x1 = 50
x2 = 8
pooled proportion = (50 + 8) / (550 + 2950) = 0.0169
z = (0.0909 - 0.0027) / sqrt(0.0169 * (1 - 0.0169) * (1/550 + 1/2950)) = 8.93
The p-value for this test is the probability of getting a z-value of 8.93 or greater under the null hypothesis. This is an extremely small probability, so we can reject the null hypothesis at the 0.05 significance level.

Learn more about probability here:

https://brainly.com/question/16447117

#SPJ11

Answer:

4,000 pounds

Step-by-step explanation:

One ton is equal to 2,000 pounds.
Therefore, a boulder that weighs 2 tons would weigh:

2 tons x 2,000 pounds/ton = 4,000 pounds

So the boulder weighed 4,000 pounds.