Answer:
public defender is the correct answer
Answer:
Public Defenders.
Explanation:
Public Defenders, are given to Individuals who cannot pay for a legal defense team. Public defenders were established for the main purpose of the Miranda rights, in 1913 the State of California created the Public Defenders office and has evolved. In the Miranda rights it says "You have the right to an attorney, if you cannot afford one, one will be provided to you by the State" this is referring to Public Defenders.
Principles that apply to all crimes are known as what?
A.) Criminal law
B.) Specific criminal law
C.) General criminal law
D.) Common law
Answer:
I think its d but im.not 100% so if I'm wrong please tell me
PLEASE HURRY
The idea that the white race is superior to other races is called______.
A) White Supremacy
B) White Dominance
C) Constitutional Law
D) Racial Equality
What is presumption of innocence ?
What is the difference between the standard of proof and the burden of proof?
What does beyond reasonable doubt mean to you?
Answer:The presumption of innocence until proven guilty means that the burden of proof is always on the government to satisfy you that [defendant] is guilty of the crime with which [he/she] is charged beyond a reasonable doubt. ... This burden never shifts to [defendant].
 A president usually honors the principle of senatorial courtesy in appointing judges to district courts. Why is this?
Answer:
The United State constitution says that ALL Judiciary appointments by the President are to be taken up by the United States Senate. A president can do that to fill the courts with Conservative or Liberal Views, or because he wants to fill as much as possible.
Do you believe the Federal Government is abiding by the 10th Amendment? Why or why not? How should states use the 10th Amendment to their advantage against the Federal Government?
Which of the following is NOT a circumstance outlined in Tennessee v. Garner which justifies the right for an officer to use deadly force?
A. When an officer witness firsthand the suspect breaking into private property
B. When an officer is threatened with a deadly weapon
C. When an officer believes the suspect poses a threat of serious harm to the officer or another
D. When the officer believes the suspect has committed a crime involving threatened or actual serious physical harm or death to another
Answer:
B. when an officer is threatened with a deadly weapon.
Explanation:
Answer:
B. When an officer is threatened with a deadly weapon
Explanation:
When an officer is threatened with a deadly weapon is not a circumstance outlined in Tennessee v. Garner which justifies the right for an officer to use deadly force.
Negotiation is the process by which people involved in a dispute discuss their problem and try to reach a solution acceptable to all.
True
False
Political Canvassing Activities
• Answering phone calls
.
Going door-to-door with party materials
. Working booths at local festivals
?
Which item best completes the chart?
O A. Raising money for campaigns
B. Joining political parties
C. Contributing to party newsletters
D. Registering voters
Political Canvassing Activity
Answering phone callsContributing to party newslettersWhat is Political canvassing?Is an act of indulging people or Individual to vote for a particular candidate or political party.
People from the party can move around from places to places, run adverts as well as campaigns to canvass for People's vote.
Therefore, Political Canvassing Activity includes answering phone calls and contributing to party newsletters.
Learn more about canvassing here,
https://brainly.com/question/1599801
#SPJ5
Answer:
contributing to party newsletters
Explanation: Just took the test hope this helps <3
Which is an example of an individual bioethical decision?
A. whether or not to fight against human suffering
B. whether or not the United States should help Liberia’s Ebola crisis
C. whether or not to vote for a candidate who is for compulsory vaccination
D. whether or not to take steroids
Answer:
C
Explanation:
I think it’s right
It is clear that when people commit crimes, they can be arrested, prosecuted, and convicted. What if a
person only thinks about committing a crime? Alternatively, what if a person attempts to commit a crime,
but is not actually able to carry it out? Do you think it is right for a person to be arrested and charged for
almost committing a crime if no crime occurred? Explain your reasoning and provide an example to
illustrate your point.
whats a good explanation for civil law?
Answer:
Civil law deals with behavior that constitutes an injury to an individual or other private party, such as a corporation. Examples are defamation (including libel and slander), breach of contract, negligence resulting in injury or death, and property damage.
Explanation:
hopefully this helps!
:> have an amazing day, and sorry if it doesn't hep.
Select the correct answer. What is a treaty? A. an informal agreement between two or more nations B. a formal agreement between two heads of state C. an informal agreement between two heads of state D. a formal agreement between two or more nations
Answer:
d
Explanation:
Question 34
Which of the following is a right protected through procedural due process?
O A) the right to free speech
O B) the right to jury
ting
O C) the right to travel
O D) the right to vote
Answer:
D) the right to vote
Out of these options the answer that is a right protected through procedural due process is the right to Jury. The answer to this question is option B.
The procedural process refers to the process that the government of the United States has to follow before they can deprive a citizen of several of his rights.
The due process that has to be followed has to do with the right to the establishment of the jury.
The judge would have to carry out the sentencing only after the jury have established their facts.
Read more on https://brainly.com/question/15242689?referrer=searchResults
Order the CRIMINAL jurisdiction of the following courts from the LOWEST to the HIGHEST (smallest court to the biggest court) 1. Supreme Court of the U.S. 12. Court of Appeals * 3. Justice of the Peace Court 14. District Court 15. County Court at Law 6. Court of Criminal Appeals
Answer:
huh what do you what us to do
Explanation:
A=b=c=d=e=t AILHFSUJFKA =???
Answer:
R
Explanation:
A(n) ________ is a professional who investigates the ethical issues regarding a real-world situation and assesses their legal or regulatory implications in terms of compliance.
A. institutional review board member
B. applied ethics committee member
C. ethics and compliance officer
Answer:
C
Explanation:
C.ethics and compliance officer
whats a good explanation for constitutional law?
Constitutional law is a body of law which defines the role, powers, and structure of different entities within a state, namely, the executive, the parliament or legislature, and the judiciary; as well as the basic rights of citizens and, in federal countries such as the United States and Canada, the relationship between the central government and state, provincial, or territorial governments.
I hope this helps!
need help quick! , which one is it ?
it should be the 4th one.
You should always leave yourself plenty of space between yourself and the vehicle in front of you.
O a) true
Ob) false
Answer:
a) true.......but to an extent u should leave sufficient enough space...the legal spacing would have to be used