What are three reasons why geography was one of the reasons why Gettysburg was a turning point?

Answer:

Zheng The biggest and most sophisticated navy the world has ever seen was under his command. The trips were designed to showcase China's might and culture while also returning with exotic artifacts for the Ming court. Zheng In 1405, he embarked on his first voyage, with about 27,800 soldiers.

Explanation:

The explanation is in the answer.

The correct answer is: Ulysses S. Grant displayed a military genius for setting large goals.

During the early western theater of the Civil War, Ulysses S. Grant was appointed as the commander of the Union Army. In April 1862, he led his army in a campaign to take control of the strategic city of Vicksburg, Mississippi.

However, Grant faced a Confederate force led by General P.G.T. Beauregard that was estimated to be around 30,000 soldiers. Grant decided to attack the Confederate forces, even though he was outnumbered. He set a large goal for his army, which was to defeat the Confederates and take control of the city.

Learn more about Ulysses S. Grant

https://brainly.com/question/16874216

#SPJ4

Full Question: In the early western theater of the civil war, ulysses s. grant

group of answer choices

Sergius Paulus, a government official, was saved in Cyprus during the encounter with the Apostle Paul, as recorded in the Acts of the Apostles.

According to the New Testament book of Acts (Acts 13:4-12), Sergius Paulus, a Roman proconsul and government official in Cyprus, encountered the Apostle Paul during Paul's missionary journey. Elymas, a Jewish sorcerer and false prophet, was opposing Paul's message and seeking to turn the proconsul away from the faith. In response, Paul, filled with the Holy Spirit, rebuked Elymas and temporarily blinded him. Witnessing this display of power, Sergius Paulus was amazed and came to believe in the teachings of Paul and the message of Christianity.

This event marked a significant turning point in Sergius Paulus' life as a government official. It demonstrated the power of God and led him to embrace the Christian faith. The conversion of Sergius Paulus in Cyprus is one of the notable instances in the book of Acts where influential individuals, including government officials, responded positively to the preaching of the early Christians, contributing to the spread of Christianity throughout the Roman Empire.

Learn more about Cyprus : brainly.com/question/732351
#SPJ11

Answer: Francesco Crispi

The statement that is not true of the Revolutionary War is C. All enslaved African Americans were rewarded for their service in the war.

During the Revolutionary War, enslaved African Americans faced complex circumstances and choices. While some Afrcan Americans did fight in the war on both the American and British sides, their experiences varied, and not all were rewarded for their service.

The promise of freedom and opprtunities for enslaved individuals depended on various factors, including state laws, individual circumstances, and the evolving dynamics of the war.

While some enslaved individuals gained their fredom as a result of their service or through negotiated agreements with their ownrs, it was not a universal outcome.

Find out more on the Revolutionary war at https://brainly.com/question/901556

#SPJ1

The standard iconography associated with nineteenth-century scenes of a harem includes an unkempt bed in a curtained room and a seductive female figure.

In nineteenth-century Orientalist art, depictions of harems often featured specific visual motifs that became standard iconography. One prominent element is an unkempt bed, which symbolizes the sensuality and intimate nature of the harem. The disheveled state of the bed implies recent or ongoing sexual activity, adding to the allure and eroticization of the scene.

Additionally, a seductive female figure is a key component of the harem iconography. This figure is typically portrayed as exotic, alluring, and often shown in revealing attire. She embodies the Western imagination of the Eastern or Middle Eastern harem as a place of mystery, eroticism, and the fulfillment of male fantasies.

To learn more about harem, click here: brainly.com/question/32140296

#SPJ11

The Strategic Arms Limitation Treaty (SALT), signed by President Richard Nixon with the Soviet Union, was an effort to advance the foreign policy of detente.

The SALT agreements were a series of treaties signed between the United States and the Soviet Union, aimed at limiting the production and deployment of nuclear weapons by both countries. The SALT negotiations were part of a broader foreign policy initiative by President Nixon and his administration called detente.

Detente was an effort to ease tensions between the United States and the Soviet Union, and to reduce the risk of nuclear war. The SALT agreements were seen as a major accomplishment of the detente policy, and helped to stabilize the relationship between the two superpowers during the 1970s.

To know more about Richard Nixon, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/199427

#SPJ4

Answer:

China and North Korea.

Answer:

Heya Let's Calculate.

Explanation:

Let the height be x.

We know that,

Area of trapezoid=[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]×(p+q)×h

=[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]×(30+50)x=400 unit²

⇒[tex]\frac{1}{2}[/tex]×80x=400

⇒40x=400

x=400÷40

=10.

Therefore, the height of the trapezoid is 10 units.

The following best describes Belgium's role in encouraging ethnic division in Rwanda.

The correct options are C and D.

The Hutu, Tutsi, and Twa ethnic groups were legally and institutionally divided as a result of the Belgium colonial authorities' introduction of identity cards that identified the individual's ethnicity in 1933. This split did not previously exist in such a rigid form.

The Tutsi were given preference over the Hutu because they were regarded as superior under Belgian colonial rule and had easier access to jobs, education, and political power. But once Belgium recognized Rwanda's independence in 1962, it changed course and installed the Hutu majority in authority, inciting animosity and hostility among the Tutsi minority.

Thus, the ideal selections are options C and D.

Learn more about Belgium's colonial here:

https://brainly.com/question/9225009

#SPJ1

The fighting in the Texas Revolution of 1836 primarily took place in the southern and southeastern cardinal directions.

During the Texas Revolution, the majority of the military engagements occurred in the southern and southeastern parts of the region. The conflict centered around the territory of Texas, which was then a part of Mexico. Key battles such as the Siege of the Alamo and the Battle of San Jacinto were fought in these cardinal directions. The Alamo, located in San Antonio, saw a Texian force defend against a Mexican army. The final battle at San Jacinto, which resulted in a decisive Texian victory, took place near present-day Houston. The southern and southeastern directions were crucial battlegrounds where Texian forces fought for independence from Mexico, eventually leading to the establishment of the Republic of Texas.

Learn more about Texas Revolution here: brainly.com/question/29864739

#SPJ11

Some southern states tried to block integration after the Brown vs. Board of Education (1954) called for the end of "seperate but equal" school facilities.

Southern states felt that this was an abuse of federal power and thought that this issue of school integration would be best left up to each state individually.

This is why it would take years, possibly even decades, for some Southern schools to integrate.

Therefore, Some southern states tried to block integration after the Brown vs. Board of Education (1954) called for the end of "seperate but equal" school facilities.

Learn more about southern states on:

https://brainly.com/question/14079520

#SPJ1

Belgian colonialism played a significant role in paving the way for the Rwandan holocaust. Before colonization, Rwanda was primarily governed by the Tutsi monarchy.

However, when Belgium colonized Rwanda in 1916, it created a divide between the Tutsis and Hutus.

They introduced an identification system based on physical features such as nose length and height, which classified people as either Tutsi, Hutu, or Twa.

The Belgians favored the Tutsis, who they saw as more "civilized" and gave them better education and job opportunities. This created resentment among the Hutus who felt oppressed and marginalized.
The Belgians also gave the Tutsis preferential treatment in political representation, which further fueled resentment among the Hutus. In 1959, the Hutus rose up against the Tutsi monarchy, leading to a revolution and the establishment of a Hutu-led government.
The Hutu-led government continued to use the divide-and-rule tactics introduced by the Belgians, and tensions between the Hutus and Tutsis escalated.

The Rwandan Patriotic Front (RPF), made up primarily of Tutsis who had fled to Uganda, launched an invasion of Rwanda in 1990, leading to a four-year civil war.

Know more about Belgian colonialism  here:

https://brainly.com/question/8009182

#SPJ11

In Buckley v. Valeo (1976), the United States Supreme Court ruled that spending by or on behalf of a political candidate is protected speech under the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Option (C)

The case challenged the Federal Election Campaign Act of 1971, which placed limits on the amount of money individuals and groups could donate to political campaigns. The court upheld these contribution limits but struck down limits on independent expenditures, arguing that they violated the free speech rights of candidates and their supporters.

The decision has had a significant impact on campaign finance law in the United States, paving the way for the rise of political action committees (PACs) and Super PACs.

Learn more about  First Amendment

https://brainly.com/question/13163035

#SPJ4

The original Greek phrase from Thucydides' work that corresponds to the saying "the strong do what they can and the weak suffer what they must" is  (hoi men athrooi drōsin hoi de atrooi paschousin).

The saying is a commentary on the nature of power and its relationship to justice. It suggests that those who are strong will use their power to further their interests, while those who are weak will inevitably suffer as a result. This idea has been influential in political theory and international relations, as it reflects a pessimistic view of human nature and the inherent struggle for power in society.

The saying has also been interpreted as a warning against the dangers of unchecked power, and a call for the need to establish systems of governance and international relations that can mitigate the effects of power imbalances.

For more about Greek phrase:

https://brainly.com/question/28096594

#SPJ11

The Soviet Union and Eastern European communist regimes treated displaced persons returning home from the West after the Second World War in a variety of ways, depending on the individual circumstances and the policies of each regime.

In general, however, these regimes did not welcome the return of displaced persons, as they saw them as potential threats to their own power and control.

Many of the displaced persons who returned home were forced to live in difficult conditions, often in overcrowded and unsanitary camps. They were often denied basic human rights, including the right to work, the right to own property, and the right to freedom of movement. In some cases, they were subjected to political persecution, imprisonment, or even execution.

Learn more about Soviet Union

https://brainly.com/question/10173240

#SPJ4

The complete question may be like:

Approximately how many freed individuals were starting new lives after the abolition of slavery?

After the abolition of slavery, a substantial number of freed individuals embarked on the challenging journey of starting new lives. While it is difficult to determine an exact figure, it is estimated that millions of formerly enslaved individuals sought to forge their own paths and build independent lives.

The process of starting anew involved various aspects such as establishing their identities, finding employment, reuniting with family members, and navigating the complexities of post-slavery society. Many freed individuals sought opportunities in agriculture, becoming tenant farmers or sharecroppers. Others migrated to urban areas in search of employment and better living conditions. Some pursued education to improve their prospects and secure a brighter future for themselves and their children.

The exact number of freed individuals starting new lives is challenging to ascertain due to limited records and varying sources. Moreover, the transition from slavery to freedom was not a uniform experience, as factors such as location, access to resources, and racial discrimination influenced individual outcomes. Nonetheless, the post-abolition period witnessed a significant wave of freed individuals taking strides towards self-determination, resilience, and the pursuit of a better life.

For more such question on abolition of slavery

https://brainly.com/question/5801500

#SPJ11

Preserved food remains found in Pompeii include carbonized food, Pompeian wine, and preserved fish and seafood.

The three types of food remains found preserved in Pompeii include:

Carbonized food: Due to the volcanic eruption of Mount Vesuvius in 79 AD, organic materials were carbonized by the intense heat, resulting in the preservation of bread, fruits, vegetables, and grains in their charred form.

Pompeian wine: Amphorae and other containers containing wine were discovered in Pompeii, providing insights into the local wine production and consumption during that time.

Fish and seafood: Pompeii's proximity to the sea allowed for the preservation of fish and other marine species.

Learn more about Pompeii on:

https://brainly.com/question/13462451

#SPJ1

Farmers are vital for food production, facing challenges like weather and market fluctuations. Their social class varies, influenced by government policies and technological advancements in agriculture.

Farmers occupy a significant position within social class structures. As individuals engaged in agricultural activities, they contribute to food production and supply, playing a crucial role in sustaining societies. However, the social class of farmers can differ across various contexts.

Farmers often face unique challenges that can impact their social and economic standing. Factors such as unpredictable weather patterns, market fluctuations, and increasing input costs pose risks to their income and livelihood security. The ability to access resources and support systems greatly influences their social class position.

The social status and recognition of farmers vary widely. In some societies, farmers may be considered part of the working class, toiling for subsistence. In other cases, farmers may belong to the middle class, benefiting from modest success in agricultural endeavors. On the other end of the spectrum, a few farmers may even own large agricultural estates, placing them within the upper class.

Government policies and agricultural reforms have a profound impact on farmers' social class dynamics. Adequate support, subsidies, and investment in rural development can uplift farmers' social and economic status. Conversely, neglect or unfavorable policies can perpetuate their marginalization and lower their social standing.

Technological advancements and the modernization of agriculture also shape the social class composition of farmers. Mechanization, precision farming, and the adoption of innovative techniques have transformed farming practices. These changes can affect the social and economic roles of farmers, potentially leading to shifts in their social class categorization.

In conclusion, farmers occupy various social class positions depending on factors such as government support, economic conditions, and technological advancements. Recognizing their contributions and addressing their needs is essential for equitable agricultural development and a just society.

For more such question on Social Class

https://brainly.com/question/14201858

#SPJ11

Thomas the Apostle's reaction to the risen Christ can be seen as a sign of Jesus Christ's divinity for several reasons.

First, Thomas's initial reaction to the news of Jesus' resurrection was skepticism. He did not believe that Jesus had risen from the dead until he saw and touched the wounds in Jesus' hands and side for himself. This skepticism suggests that Thomas had a deep faith in Jesus as the Messiah, but he needed tangible evidence to believe in his resurrection. This evidence shows that Jesus had the power to overcome death and that he was truly divine.

Second, Thomas's response to Jesus' resurrection demonstrates his belief in Jesus as the Son of God. When Jesus appeared to the disciples, he invited Thomas to put his finger into the wounds in his hands and his side. Thomas did so, and then he declared, "My Lord and my God!" (John 20:28). This declaration of faith shows that Thomas recognized Jesus as God incarnate, which is a belief that is central to Christian theology.

Learn more about Apostle's Visit: brainly.com/question/31455672

#SPJ4

Charles A. Lindbergh Jr. made history in 1927 when he completed the first solo transatlantic flight from New York to Paris.

As a mail pilot based in St. Louis, Lindbergh became the first person to successfully fly across the Atlantic Ocean in a single-engine plane. His achievement was widely celebrated, and Lindbergh became an instant celebrity.

His flight helped to usher in a new era of aviation and sparked increased interest in the possibilities of air travel. Lindbergh's solo transatlantic flight remains one of the most significant events in aviation history and continues to inspire pilots and aviation enthusiasts around the world.

To know more about solo transatlantic flight refer here: https://brainly.com/question/30366955#

#SPJ11

Alexander Werth was a British journalist who visited the Majdanek concentration camp in 1945, shortly after it was liberated by Soviet forces. In his book "Russia at War," Werth described his reaction to what he saw at Majdanek in vivid detail.

According to Werth, when he first saw Majdanek, he was "horrified and sickened" by what he saw. He described the camp as a "hell on earth," and he was particularly struck by the piles of human hair that he saw scattered throughout the camp. He also saw the bodies of dead prisoners, some of whom were still alive when they were liberated, and he was deeply affected by the sight of their emaciated and lifeless forms.

Werth also described the living conditions at the camp, which were appalling. He wrote that the prisoners were "huddled together like animals" in overcrowded barracks, and that they had to survive on a bare subsistence diet of scraps and leftovers. He also noted the absence of basic sanitation and hygiene in the camp, which contributed to the spread of disease and death among the prisoners.

Learn more about Majdanek visit: brainly.com/question/30050308

#SPJ4

Answer:

because in1932 the slaves knocked it down

Explanation:

The belief in internal efficacy refers to an individual's confidence in their ability to participate and have an impact on politics, while external efficacy pertains to the belief that the government will be responsive to the concerns and needs of the citizens.

Internal efficacy relates to an individual's perception of their own efficacy and influence in political processes. It reflects the belief that one's actions, such as voting, engaging in political discussions, or participating in activism, can make a difference. Individuals with a high level of internal efficacy are more likely to actively participate in politics, express their opinions, and work towards achieving their desired political outcomes.

External efficacy, on the other hand, refers to an individual's perception of the responsiveness of the government. It reflects the belief that the government will listen to the concerns and preferences of the citizenry and take appropriate action. People with high external efficacy are more likely to trust the government, engage in political activities, and have faith in the democratic system.

These two forms of efficacy are interconnected. Internal efficacy influences individuals' willingness to engage in political processes, while external efficacy is shaped by their experiences and perceptions of how responsive the government is to their needs and demands. A strong belief in both internal and external efficacy is essential for a healthy democracy, as it fosters active citizen participation, trust in the government, and a sense of ownership over political processes.

Overall, internal efficacy and external efficacy play crucial roles in shaping individuals' political behavior and their perceptions of the government. These beliefs influence citizens' willingness to participate in politics and their expectations of the responsiveness of the government, ultimately shaping the overall health and functioning of democratic systems.

Learn more about Government : brainly.com/question/4160287
#SPJ11

The difference between a per se violation and a violation subject to the rule of reason under section 1 of the sherman act is per se violations do not require an economic analysis; they are presumed to be anti-competitive.

The correct option is B.

A per se violation of the Sherman Act (Section 1) is an act that is considered illegal without consideration of the particular circumstances of the case or market.

Examples include horizontal price-fixing, group boycotts, and certain tying arrangements. These violations are automatically considered to be illegal and will be subject to full criminal and civil penalties.

A violation subject to the rule of reason is an act that may be legal or illegal depending on the particular circumstances of the case and market. The rule of reason analysis looks at the facts of the case and asks whether the restraint on trade has caused an unreasonable restraint of trade, or if the benefits outweigh the potential harm. If the restraint has caused an unreasonable restraint of trade, then it is illegal. If the benefits outweigh the potential harm, then it is legal.

To know more about Sherman Act , click here:

https://brainly.com/question/17205276

#SPJ4

The Question is -

The difference between a per se violation and a violation subject to the rule of reason under section 1 of the sherman act is:

A) per se violations involve corporations. The rule of reason applies to individuals and partnerships.

B)  per se violations do not require an economic analysis; they are presumed to be anti-competitive.

C) Violations that are subject to the rule of reason are assumed to be anti-competitive and do not require economic analysis.

D)  per se violations applied to publicly-traded operations; the rule of reason applied to closely held corporations.

The American Medical Association (AMA) has defined a condition called "brain death" as the criteria for determining death.

According to the AMA, brain death is defined as the irreversible loss of all brain functions, including the brainstem. This means that the person has no activity in the cerebral cortex, which is responsible for consciousness and higher brain functions, as well as in the brainstem, which controls essential bodily functions such as breathing and heart rate.

Brain death is considered to be the legal and medical definition of death in many jurisdictions. The criteria for determining brain death involve a comprehensive evaluation by medical professionals, including clinical examinations and tests to confirm the absence of brain activity.

To learn more about brain death click here :

brainly.com/question/5649858

#SPJ11

Answer:

OC

Explanation:

He wanted to restore order to Europe.

Hebrew religion change as a result of the Babylonian Captivity as (C) It was exposed to Zoroastrianism.

The Hebrew religion changed as a result of the Babylonian Captivity by being exposed to Zoroastrianism.

This exposure influenced the development of Jewish beliefs, including the concept of monotheism and ideas about the end times and resurrection.

Although the Hebrew religion faced challenges during this period, it persisted and evolved, incorporating new ideas from the encounter with Zoroastrianism.

Know more about Zoroastrianism here:

https://brainly.com/question/5308893

#SPJ11

Life in the Roman Republic was characterized by a complex system of government and a focus on civic duty, while life in the Roman Empire was marked by a more centralized government and a focus on the emperor. For example, the Republic had two consuls elected annually, while the Empire was ruled by a single emperor. However, both periods shared cultural and societal characteristics, such as a polytheistic religion, a reliance on slavery, and a hierarchical social structure.

Life in the Roman Republic and the Roman Empire had both similarities and differences.

The Roman Republic was marked by a complex system of government, with an emphasis on civic duty and public service.

For example, consuls were elected annually and held the highest power in the Republic.

In contrast, the Roman Empire was characterized by a centralized government, with an emphasis on the emperor as the sole ruler.

Augustus, the first emperor, held supreme power and was considered a god-like figure.

However, both periods shared cultural and societal characteristics such as a polytheistic religion, a reliance on slavery, and a hierarchical social structure, with an upper class consisting of wealthy landowners and a lower class consisting of peasants and slaves.

Additionally, both periods saw significant expansion of the Roman Empire through military conquests.

For more such questions on Roman Republic :

https://brainly.com/question/23304167

#SPJ11