According to his speech, the instant Frederick Douglass stepped on the shore of England and looked in the faces of the crowd, he saw in ecery man a recognition of his manhood. What did he notice a "perfect absence" of?
Answer:
He noticed "a perfect absence, of everything like that disgusting hate with which we are pursued in this country".
Explanation:
In his speech "Abolition Fanaticism in New York", Frederick Douglass recounts how he had gained his freedom and went to England where there are freedom and liberty for all, not only the whites but also for the black people. His speech particularly contains his work towards trying to help free his fellow black people from being oppressed by Whites especially in America.
He stated that his purpose in coming to America and giving a speech is to try to help his fellow human beings being put under a master. He recounts how his very first experience in England was way greater as compared to his life in America. In England, he was recognized as a human being, as a man of his own, unlike America where he was looked as a slave and treated so. In his own words, he said "I saw in every man a recognition of my manhood, and an absence, a perfect absence, of everything like that disgusting hate with which we are pursued in this country." This is the difference between America and England, which he wants his other black fellow men to be able to enjoy- the freedom of being recognized as a man and not a slave.
The thing which he noticed was a "perfect absence" of is:
Inequality and slaverySlaveryThis refers to the ownership of humans by other humans where they have masters and are under another's rule, without rights or freedom.
Based on Frederick Douglas's speech, he talked about his visit to England and how he saw that everyone is equal.
Read more about Frederick Douglass here:
https://brainly.com/question/16024772
How were the accomplishments of Toussaint Louverture and Simón Bolívar
different?
A. Louverture fought for independence, while Bolívar wanted to maintain colonial rule in South America.
B. Louverture liberated the northern part of South America from Spanish rule, while Bolívar freed Haiti From France.
C. Louverture focused on ending slavery, while Bolívar was more interested in achieving independence.
D. Louverture freed the southern part of South America from Spain, while Bolívar liberated the northern part.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. Louverture focused on ending slavery, while Bolívar was more interested in achieving independence.
Explanation:
Toussaint Louverture was the main leader of the Haitian Revolution, started in 1791 as a slave revolt in the French colony of Saint Domingue and ended in 1804 with the independence of Haiti, the first Latin American country to obtain emancipation.
Specifically, Louverture participated in the third stage of this conflict, which was from 1799 to 1801. There, he managed to form an army of almost 50,000 men who confronted and defeated the French forces, forming a self-government in the colony that in 1804 was He would become independent under the name of Haiti, although with Louverture already deceased, having died in captivity after being kidnapped by the French as a prisoner of war.
In turn, Simón Bolivar was the most influential and famous of the leaders of the war of independence of the Spanish colonies in Latin America. He was awarded the honorary title of Libertador because of his decisive contribution to the independence of Colombia, Ecuador, Panama, Peru and Venezuela. Its intention was to create a single Latin American nation, encompassing all the former Spanish colonies on the continent, under the name of Gran Colombia. Finally, his proposal did not prosper.
Who wrote the new Japanese constitution?
British officials
members of thy Diet
the Allied governments
US Army officers
Answer:
i believe its D
Explanation:
which statement best explains how the constitution addresed a weakness in the articles of confederaction
B. Congress had no way to enforce or interpret the laws it passed, so the Constitution created the executive and judicial branches of the federal government.
Explanation:
Before the United States Constitution, there was the Articles of Confederation. These Articles ended up getting completely thrown out and replaced because many people thought it was too weak and brought the country down.
The Articles of Confederation was known to be very weak and gave little to no power to the federal government. The federal government could not properly create or enforce laws, regulate trade, or tax citizens. This made it very difficult to get anything done and many people thought that it weakened the country.
Anti-Federalists opposed creating a new constitution, as they felt like having a strong government was a threat. Federalists felt the opposite and they wanted to have a strong government and they thought that having a strong government meant having a strong country.
With the Articles of Confederation, Congress couldn't really enforce or interpret any laws that were passed, which the Federalists did not agree with. When the Articles were replaced by the United States Constitution, branches were created in order to equally distribute power and make sure that no power would be used in an unfair or unethical manner.
Which group of Europeans formed alliances with leaders in Kongo during the 1400s and 1500s?
A. Spanish
B. French
C. English
D. Portuguese
Answer:
D. Portuguese
Explanation:
The Portuguese formed alliances with Kongo leaders in the 1400s and 1500s.
The Kongo had been unstable with factional and regional conflicts and accepted an alliance with the Portuguese so they could restore order.
The Kongo leaders gave the Portuguese some colonies, allowing them to trade and have access to the Kongo slave labor.
Answer:
D. Portuguese
Explanation:
is right, I don't know why it has 3 stars???
How does this relate to the premises of Brown v. Board of Education? The Brown case addresses whether localities have the authority to label individuals by race. The Brown case addresses whether the laws of Southern states are racially biased. The Brown case addresses whether penalties and punishments can legally vary by race. The Brown case addresses whether facilities separated by race are permissible by law.
Answer:
Read the excerpt from the Supreme Court’s ruling in Plessy v. Ferguson.
That petitioner was a citizen of the United States and a resident of the State of Louisiana, of mixed descent . . . on June 7, 1892, he engaged and paid for a first class passage on the East Louisiana Railway . . . and thereupon entered a passenger train, and took possession of a vacant seat in a coach where passengers of the white race were accommodated; that such railroad company was incorporated by the laws of Louisiana as a common carrier, and was not authorized to distinguish between citizens according to their race. But, notwithstanding this, petitioner was required by the conductor, under penalty of ejection from said train and imprisonment, to vacate said coach and occupy another seat in a coach assigned by said company for persons not of the white race.
How does this relate to the premises of Brown v. Board of Education?
1) The Brown case addresses whether localities have the authority to label individuals by race.
2) The Brown case addresses whether the laws of Southern states are racially biased.
3) The Brown case addresses whether penalties and punishments can legally vary by race.
CORRECT ANSWER IS
4) The Brown case addresses whether facilities separated by race are permissible by law.
Explanation:
Edge 2021
Answer:
d. The Brown case addresses whether facilities separated by race are permissible by law.
Explanation:
EDGE22
heeelp please! History class
yo what extent did Yellow Journalism lead to war with spain? What benefit did the newspaper owners gain from the war? How has journalism evolved since the Spanish American War? is the told or prominence of media today likely to have a greater or lesser affect in the American public now? Fully explain your answer and give specific examples when needed at least 150 word (i will really appreciate it)
Answer:
Yellow Journalism pitted American Public opinion against Spain, which pushed public support to carry on a war with Spain.
Explanation:
Yellow Journalism, is essentially a bully pulpit tactic within journalism which allows public opinion to be swindled easily through tactful journalism. Essentially the United States government claimed that Spain shot down one of the American ships next to Cuba, which gave Roosevelt his glory conquest to obtain territory for the United States such as: The Philipines a good example. Journalism, since the american war has changed with style, but hasn't exactly changed from the original purpose; which is swaying the American to adopt certain thought-process or behave in a way to act socially acceptable to the mindsets of the time.
Why did Rama leave Sita after rescuing her?
Answer:
Hope this helpd :)
Explanation:
She is imprisoned in Ashoka Vatika in Lanka until she is rescued by Rama, who slays her captor. One day a man questioned the purity of Sita and in order to prove her purity and maintain the unquestionable dignity of Ayodhya kingdom and King Rama, she decides to leave the kingdom and sacrifice her place.
San Martín's strategy to consolidate independence
Answer:
San Martín's strategy to consolidate independence of Argentina was expelling Spaniards from neighboring countries.
Explanation:
Jose de San Martin was the main liberator of Argentina and the southern part of South America during the 1810s and 1820s. It was a military man born in Argentina, at that time the Viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata colony, who had been educated in Spain and had fought for this country in the Napoleonic wars. Therefore, he was an experienced warrior who, once noted of the independence movement, decided to return to his homeland to lead the troops. His first battle was in San Lorenzo, in February 1813, followed by other iconic contests until on July 9, 1816, Argentina declared its independence from Spain.
But San Martin knew that, if they did not cooperate with neighboring countries, the Spanish would win and return to Argentine territory. For this reason, he organized the Army of the Andes to liberate Chile, which he achieved in 1818 after the Battle of Maipu.
Later, he continued with his army to the north, liberating Peru in 1821 and leaving the command of the South American independence effort to Simon Bolivar in 1822.
Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" speech:
described how the U.S. had failed to apply the principles of the Declaration of Independence to African Americans.
urged people to use violence to end segregation.
argued that the U.S. would never overcome racism.
All of these choices are correct.
Answer:
Dr. King's "I Have a Dream" speech described how the U.S. had failed to apply the principles of the Declaration of Independence to African Americans.
Explanation:
I Have a Dream is the title of a famous speech by Martin Luther King, which he gave on August 28, 1963. The speech summarized the most important demands of the Civil Rights Movement for the social, economic, political and legal equality of African Americans in the form of a future vision for the United States. It expressed King's hope for future agreement between the Constitution, particularly its principle of equality, and social reality, which was largely shaped by segregation and racism. The refrain-like, spontaneously improvised sentence "I have a dream" of the final passages became the title of the speech. This became one of King's most cited speeches, which exemplified his view of the American Dream, in which the rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness would be the same for all men regardless of race.
Congress passed the Clean Air Act in 1970. Since this act was passed, emissions of the six main air pollutants Group of answer choices cannot be measured since Congress failed to appropriate money to monitor the level of emissions. have fallen by more than one-half. have remained essentially constant, even though significant economic growth has occurred in the United States since 1970. have increased significantly due to the growth of the U.S. economy.
Answer:
have fallen by more than one-half.
Explanation:
Thick, noticeable smog in many of the cities and manufacturing centers of the United States helped bring the 1970 e Clean Air Act to spur passage at the height of the national environmental movement. The ensuing modifications were intended to enhance its effectiveness and address newly recognized problems of air pollution such as acid rain and stratospheric ozone layer damage. The Clean Air Act allows EPA to set national environmental air quality levels for certain specific and prevalent contaminants, based on the latest research, to protect public health and welfare nationally. Certain main regulations are intended to reduce the rise in emissions from increasing motor vehicle numbers and new manufacturing plants.
Which of the following was shipped from Europe to Africa?
EUROPE
NORTH
AMERICA
AFRICA
SOUTH
AMERICA
O A. Guns
B. Cotton
O C. Spices
D. Slaves
I believe it was spices.
Answer: A. Guns
Explanation:
This man was in charge of the overthrow of the Soviet government in the late 1980s.
Answer:
Boris Yeltsin
Explanation:
Select the answer that matches the following definition. This purpose of joint operations is to maintain an arsenal capable of deterring potential adversaries and to assure U.S. allies and other security partners that they can count on America's security commitments
Answer:
Deter and defeat aggression.
Explanation:
The United States Armed Forces is the agency formed by the US that consists of military forces, that is, Army, Marine Corps, Navy, and so on.
Deter and Defeat aggression is one of the primary mission of the US Armed Forces. Under this mission the US is able to deter and defeat aggression of the enemy. A true deterrence is considered to be the one in whic army is able to deny an aggressor from achieving his purposes and to impose necessary penalties on the aggressor. Under this purpose, the US Armed Force is able to ensure the safety and security of territory and population.
The given definition is concerned with the primary purpose of 'Deter and Defeat Aggression' of the US Armed Forces.
Describe three examples of anti-democratic actions by the U.S. during and after the war.
Answer:
The Middle East, Afghanistan and Taliban regime and World War I
Explanation:
During the World War I, promises were made to restore pleasant democratic practices and to ensure the rule of law take it course, apparently all these were short-lived when these promises were not effectively delivered. George W. Bush also held out promises during and after the war in Iraq which was to oust the sitting regime of Saddam Hussein so as to restore democracy and make it safe for the citizens. This later turned out to be the same disappointment and anti-democratic conclusions that were followed by Woodrow Wilson in the First World War and the Middle East was engaged in endless cycles of bloodshed after the war. A third example is that of the Taliban Regime in Afghanistan that ended in the same fate and it turned out that most times, promises that were made were likely not being prepared to be fulfilled by those who made them.
How did the United States new Western Terril increases tension between the North and South
Answer:
The new western territories that were gradually incorporated into the United States since independence became over the years into a source of tensions between the north and south of the country, due to the status with which these new territories would enter the Union in relation to slavery.
Thus, the southern states sought for these new territories to enter as slave states, while the northern states sought the opposite. In any case, it was feared that there would be an imbalance in Congress regarding the representation of the slave and abolitionist states as a consequence of the entry of new states to the Union.
In this regard, various commitments and treaties were signed, seeking to maintain peace between both sides, the most important being the Compromise of 1820 and the Compromise of 1850. Finally, these tensions broke peace and triggered the Civil War.
6. Describe a time in the debate when someone made a point and did not back it up
with strong reasons and evidence.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Unfortunately, the question is incomplete because it does not provide what kind of debate it is referring to, or who were their protagonists.
However, we can comment on the following.
As we do not know what debate the question is referring to, lets put an example when a candidate did not provide hard data or back it up
with strong reasons and evidence.
In the last presidential election, the Republican candidate accused immigrants to be dangerous people that killed American citizens in the border zone. He told that they were a threat to America. It was a simple accusation just to enrage their followers. He did not prove it with serious data. Indeed, the Media published that there had been many more crimes committed by American citizens that immigrants. But what the candidate wanted to create was a sentiment of hate to support its platform against immigration.
Answer:
In the last presidential election, the Republican candidate accused immigrants to be dangerous people that killed American citizens in the border zone
Explanation:
What was so ironic about Dean Acheson’s speech to the Delta Council in 1947?
a. Acheson had delivered the same speech to the council the year before.
b. Acheson was urging the gathering of cotton planters to automate production, while the Democrats were pushing for fair wages for black farmworkers.
c. Acheson was delivering a speech meant for new African-American Democrats in Mississippi to a gathering of white supremacists.
d. Acheson praised the president’s defense of democratic institutions in the place that did not know democracy.
e.The Under Secretary of State was warning the same audience against the Cold War that had already heard Churchill’s "Iron Curtain" speech a month prior.
Answer:
d. Acheson praised the president’s defense of democratic institutions in the place that did not know democracy.
Explanation:
Dean Acheson was United States of American' Secretary of State under Truman Administration. He was widely known for defining U.S foreign policy during the cold war.
Meanwhile, Dean Acheson’s speech to the Delta Council in 1947 was considered as ironic because, he gave speech on aiding "free peoples" to the Delta Council, where he talked about Civil Rights and how those people should exercise their liberties, but people from Delta did not have those rights because they were segregated by the segregation policy from that time, which implies that, the Delta's citizens were denied the very liberties of which he spoke.
Hence, the right answer is Acheson praised the president’s defense of democratic institutions in the place that did not know democracy.
What wasWhich technological advance did not become popular in the 1920s?
Answer:
Indoor Plumbing
Explanation:
During the 1920s, American's society and culture changed in developing into new by introducing roaring twenty, with new gadgets which helped women getting to involve in modernity. Automobiles, the radio, television, the refrigerator, and electric razor were some of the inventions that became popular in the 1920s. Many people used chamber pots to relieve themselves, which would be put under the bed or in a closet. In the 1920s, city people had indoor bathrooms and running water. Indoor plumbing arrives in rural areas during the 1930s. Farm families living in the country were accustomed to older methods of drawing water from wells and hand pumps as they did not have a water supply system.
Answer: Televisions
Explanation: I chose plumbing on the test and got it wrong. The correct answer is televisions.
Why did charles loring brace start the children aid society
Answer:
Explanation:nnjjnjnjn
((Please help asap!! Will give brainliest to correct answer.
!!))
Use the map of Korea below to answer the following question:
Map above^^
The white line politically dividing Korea represents
Select one:
a. the Iron Curtain
b. the Berlin War
c. the 38th parallel
d. the Demarcation Line of 1954
Answer:
The white line politically dividing Korea represents the 38th parallel.After WWII Korea was divided at the 38th parallel for purposes of military occupation. This line then solidified into a political frontier between American-supported Republic of Korea and the Soviet backed Democratic People's Republic of Korea. North Korean troops swept across the 38th parallel to attack South Korea.
Explanation:
i hope this will help you :)
Answer:
D
Explanation:
This is still the line today, and notice how in some areas they are more into the north or some more into the south? The few days and even the few hours before the war ended. The commanders of both sides ordered their forces to make a massive push to claim as much land as they could for their country. How did that work out? It was nearly pointless. Still, the fact that a South Korea exists. And KPOP (For some people...) Exists.
Addendum: Plus, the 38th Parallel division was once a straight line until wars end.
Did George Washington cut a tree, if so, what type of tree?
Property rights are important to individuals because they provide the
needed to secure credit. This
Mallows people to invest in small businesses or pay for education. Property rights also ensure
Y use of resources. That's because individuals will use their resources carefully and wisely to
profit
Answer:
Property rights are important to individuals because they provide the
collateral to secure credit. This credit allows people to invest in small businesses or pay for education. Property rights also ensure efficient use of resources. That’s because individuals will use their resources carefully and wisely to maximize profit.
Explanation:
What is generally seen as the most common responsibility of a politically engaged citizen?
Supporters of Manifest Destiny believed:
A. the United States was meant to extend to the Pacific Ocean.
B. it was important avoid conflicts with European countries.
C. the United States should remain the same size.
D. they should respect the rights of American Indians.
Answer:b B, it was important avoid conflicts with eropean countries
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
trust me
Which of the following was not a device that advertisers used to try and sell more goods to
maximize their profits in the late 1800s?
Answer: what are the options
Explanation:
Organizing historcal events according to the order in which they occured is an example
Answer:
Explanation:
Hello friend
It is an example of chronological thinking
Hope it helps
plz mark as brainliest!!!!!!!
An obligation is an act or duty that someone is morally or legally bound to do. Which of the following is an obligation of a good citizen? voting for the same candidate as a friend putting campaign signs in one’s front yard getting good grades in college classes serving on a jury when called to do so
Answer: serving on a jury when called to do so
Explanation:
If asked to serve on a jury, it is a responsibility. An responsibility is an act or responsibility that someone is ethically or legally obligated to perform.
An responsibility is a legal need to contribute, do, or not do something. A responsibility or obligation is an act or way to proceed to which a person is ethically or legally obligated. Obligations that give a creditors or obligee the legal right to demand their fulfilment in a court of law.
So, Option "D" is the correct answer to the following question.
Learn more:
https://brainly.com/question/17071279?referrer=searchResults
why were church leaders fearful of the new discoveries made durning the scientific revolution
Answer:
Church leaders feared that common sense would replace abstract reasoning.
Explanation:
Answer:
they were fearful that scientific revolution will replace common sense
The main reason George H.W. Bush was victorious in 1988 was the fact that he promised which of the following to voters?
Answer:
I think its B, i wasnt around then but hope i helped (:^])