Answer:
not interested in some disembodied or extrapolated truth of Cicero
Explanation:
Petrarch is not interested in some disembodied or extrapolated truth of Cicero but in his own words, his own speech and expression. He considers the actual language used to be of utmost importance in discovering the truth of Cicero
In what two ways did World War I affect the women in the United States?
Answer:
World War I had a significant impact on the women of the United States in two main ways: it opened up new opportunities for women in the workforce, and it contributed to the growth of the women's suffrage movement.
Workforce opportunities: During World War I, many men were drafted into the military, leaving a labor shortage in many industries. To fill this gap, women were encouraged to enter the workforce in large numbers for the first time, taking on jobs in factories, offices, and other industries that had previously been dominated by men. This shift in the labor force had a lasting impact on women's economic opportunities and helped to pave the way for greater gender equality in the workplace.Women's suffrage movement: World War I also contributed to the growth of the women's suffrage movement, which had been gaining momentum in the United States for several decades before the war. Women's contributions to the war effort, both on the home front and in Europe, helped to demonstrate their capabilities and their patriotism, and brought new attention to the issue of women's suffrage. In 1920, just two years after the end of the war, the 19th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified, granting women the right to vote.Overall, World War I had a significant impact on the women of the United States, opening up new opportunities for women in the workforce and contributing to the growth of the women's suffrage movement. These changes had lasting effects on women's economic and political opportunities, and helped to pave the way for greater gender equality in the decades that followed.
13. The newspaper headline on the left describes an event that took place in the
Middle East.
Which course of action did the United States take in response to this
international incident?
A. It refused to give Iraq any additional humanitarian aid.
B. It launched an invasion of Iraq to topple dictator Saddam Hussein.
C. It organized a military alliance that forced the Iraqis out of Kuwait.
D. It seized the staff of the Iraqi Embassy in Washington, D.C., as hostages.
The course of action that was taken is that : It launched an invasion of Iraq to topple dictator Saddam Hussein.
Why did the US topple Saddam Hussein?The reasons behind the US decision to topple Saddam Hussein, the former President of Iraq, are complex and multifaceted. There were several stated reasons, including:
WMDs: The US claimed that Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs) and that he was a threat to global security. However, after the invasion, no evidence of WMDs was found.
Terrorism: The US also claimed that Saddam Hussein had links to terrorist groups, including al-Qaeda, and that he supported and sponsored terrorism.
Human Rights: The US and its allies accused Saddam Hussein of committing human rights abuses against his own people, including mass killings, torture, and other atrocities.
Read more on invasion of Iraq herehttps://brainly.com/question/12483188
#SPJ1
the two requirements for a successful 42 u.s.c. section 1983 lawsuit are
For a successful 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove that a state actor violated their federally protected rights.
To successfully bring a 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 lawsuit, you must meet two key requirements:
1. The alleged violation must involve a person acting "under color of state law." This means that the defendant must be a state actor or someone working on behalf of a government entity, such as a police officer or a public school official.
2. The alleged conduct must have violated the plaintiff's rights, privileges, or immunities secured by the Constitution or federal laws. In other words, there must be a clear violation of the plaintiff's civil rights as protected by federal law or the U.S. Constitution.
In summary, for a successful 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 lawsuit, the plaintiff must prove that a state actor violated their federally protected rights.
To learn more about 42 U.S.C Section 1983 here: brainly.com/question/31166953
#SPJ11
A successful 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 lawsuit requires the plaintiff to demonstrate (1) a violation of their constitutional or federal rights by a defendant acting under color of state law, and (2) a direct causal connection between the defendant's actions and the harm experienced.
A successful 42 U.S.C. Section 1983 lawsuit has two main requirements. First, the plaintiff must demonstrate that the defendant, acting under "color of state law," violated their constitutional or federal rights. This means that the defendant, usually a state or local government official or employee, exercised their authority in a way that infringed upon the plaintiff's federally protected rights.
Second, the plaintiff must show a direct causal link between the defendant's actions and the alleged violation. In other words, the plaintiff must prove that the defendant's conduct was the primary cause of the harm suffered. Establishing this causation is essential to successfully pursuing a Section 1983 lawsuit.
For more such questions on lawsuit, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29485327
#SPJ11
What happened to African American slaves of Loyalists after they fought in the American Revolution? (2 points)
Became doctors
Ran for political office
Started schools for slave children
Were reclaimed by their owners
what forms of knowledge did europeans have of east asian civilizations prior to the publication of the travels of marco polo?
Europeans had limited knowledge of East Asian civilizations prior to the publication of the Travels of Marco Polo.
Prior to the publication of the Travels of Marco Polo in the 13th century, Europeans had limited knowledge of East Asian civilizations. Some European traders and missionaries had made contact with East Asian cultures, but their knowledge was limited to what they observed in their travels. There was also some knowledge of China that had been passed down through classical texts such as those of the ancient Greek geographer Ptolemy.The publication of the Travels of Marco Polo, however, provided Europeans with a much more detailed and accurate picture of East Asian cultures. Marco Polo was a Venetian merchant who spent over 20 years in China and other parts of East Asia, and his descriptions of the region were the most comprehensive and accurate that had been seen in Europe at the time. His accounts of the wealth and sophistication of the East Asian cultures he encountered helped to shape European perceptions of the region for centuries to come.
Learn more about East Asian civilization here:
https://brainly.com/question/6416366
#SPJ11
'none of the flyers knew the point of wearing these dark glasses'. why had they been instructed to wear them during an atomic bomb exploded
Answer:
They provided protection when an atomic bomb exploded
Explanation:
The debris can cause eye damage,maybe that's why.I'm not sure really
glass was probably first used by this ancient culture.
Glass was probably first used by the ancient Mesopotamian culture.
The ancient culture that first used glass was most likely the Mesopotamians around 3500 BCE. They used it primarily for jewelry and decorations, and later for practical items such as containers and lenses. The ancient Egyptians also used glass for decorative purposes, but it was the Mesopotamians who were the first to develop the technique of glassblowing around 100 BCE.
They later used glass for practical items such as containers and lenses. While the ancient Egyptians also used glass for decorative purposes, it was the Mesopotamians who developed the technique of glassblowing around 100 BCE, which revolutionized the production of glass items and allowed for more complex designs and shapes to be created. The art of glassblowing then spread throughout the Roman Empire and eventually to other parts of the world, contributing to the development of glassmaking as we know it today.
To learn more about Mesopotamian visit;
brainly.com/question/26116131
#SPJ11
The Founders of the United States wanted to establish a government based on the consent
of the governed, but they did not believe in democracy. How did they address this paradox
in the way that they structured the government of the United States? What possibly
unintended consequences have resulted from their institutional design choices?
Answer: Hi! Read the explanation below:
Brainliest?
Explanation:
The Founders of the United States did indeed want to establish a government based on the consent of the governed, but they were wary of direct democracy, which they saw as prone to the tyranny of the majority. To address this paradox, they designed a system of representative democracy that limited the power of the majority through a complex system of checks and balances.
The US government is divided into three branches - the legislative, executive, and judicial branches - each with its own set of powers and responsibilities. The legislative branch, made up of the Senate and the House of Representatives, is responsible for making laws. The executive branch, headed by the President, is responsible for enforcing laws, while the judicial branch, headed by the Supreme Court, is responsible for interpreting laws and determining their constitutionality.
The Founders also designed the Constitution to limit the power of the federal government and protect the rights of individuals and states. They established a system of federalism, where powers are divided between the federal government and the states, and created a Bill of Rights to protect individual freedoms such as freedom of speech and religion.
However, unintended consequences have resulted from these institutional design choices. One consequence is the gridlock and inefficiency that can occur when the branches of government are unable to cooperate and compromise. Another consequence is the tension that can arise between the federal government and the states, as each seeks to assert its own power and authority.
Furthermore, some argue that the design of the US government perpetuates inequalities and perpetuates the influence of the wealthy and powerful. For example, the Electoral College system can result in a candidate winning the presidency without winning the popular vote, as happened in the 2000 and 2016 elections. Additionally, some argue that the Supreme Court, with its unelected justices, wields too much power and is unaccountable to the people.
Overall, while the institutional design choices made by the Founders have helped to establish a stable and enduring democratic system, they have also led to unintended consequences and ongoing debates about the fairness and effectiveness of the US government.
Since the drafting of the Constitution, both the executive branch and Congress have managed to expand their powers. Which power is often cited as an example of Congress exerting too much power over states' rights?
A: the amendment prohibiting the sale of alcohol
B: Congress's control over international tariffs
C: the amendment requiring Congress to maintain a standing army
D: congressional regulation of interstate commerce
The most commonly cited example of Congress exerting too much power over states' rights is the regulation of interstate commerce.
The correct option is D.
This power is granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, which gives Congress the ability to "regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes."
This power has been used to pass a wide variety of laws, such as the Sherman Antitrust Act and the Civil Rights Act, that have been seen as overreaching and infringing on the power of the states. By regulating interstate commerce, Congress has been able to pass laws that may conflict with the laws of individual states, thus limiting the autonomy of the states in certain areas.
The correct option is D.
To know more about Congress , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/4736734
#SPJ4
Match each issue on the left its solution created by the Constitutional Convention.
federal government could not pay debts
states fear a strong central government
states have different needs and interest
people disagree on how much power states should have
:: political parties are formed
POSSIBLE POINTS: 1
::three branches of government are created :: federal government can tax the people
#states learn to compromise for a common goal
the best matches are as follows:
federal government could not pay debts --> federal government can tax the people
states fear a strong central government --> three branches of government are created
states have different needs and interest --> states learn to compromise for a common goal
people disagree on how much power states should have --> political parties are formed
what accounts for teh differences in the way that industriaslizationn affected britain, the us, russia and latin america
Answer:
The way that industrialization affected Britain, the US, Russia, and Latin America can be attributed to a variety of factors, including:
Timing: The timing of industrialization varied across these regions, with Britain and the US experiencing early industrialization in the late 18th and early 19th centuries, while Russia and Latin America experienced industrialization in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. This meant that the economic, social, and political conditions surrounding industrialization were different in each region.Natural resources: The availability of natural resources played a significant role in the way that industrialization affected these regions. Britain and the US had abundant supplies of coal and iron, which were essential for industrialization, while Russia and Latin America had different resources, such as oil, timber, and minerals.Political and social structures: The political and social structures of these regions also varied, with Britain and the US having more stable political and social systems that were conducive to industrialization, while Russia and Latin America experienced political instability and social upheaval that often hindered industrialization.Access to markets: The ability to access markets for goods and capital was also an important factor in the way that industrialization affected these regions. Britain and the US were able to access global markets early on, while Russia and Latin America faced more barriers to trade and investment.Colonialism and imperialism: The impact of colonialism and imperialism was another factor that contributed to differences in the way that industrialization affected these regions. Britain and the US were both colonial powers that were able to extract resources from their colonies to fuel industrialization, while Russia and Latin America were often exploited by foreign powers for their resources.Overall, the differences in the way that industrialization affected Britain, the US, Russia, and Latin America can be attributed to a complex interplay of factors, including timing, natural resources, political and social structures, access to markets, and colonialism and imperialism.
How have we used resistance to live up to our ideal
freedom, equality and democracy ?
Answer:
hm
Explanation:
Resistance has been a powerful tool for people and groups to fight for and uphold the ideals of freedom, equality, and democracy. Here are a few examples:
1. The Civil Rights Movement: African Americans and their allies in the United States used nonviolent resistance, civil disobedience, and other tactics to fight against segregation, discrimination, and voter suppression. The movement led to the passage of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which significantly expanded the freedoms and rights of African Americans.
2. Women's Suffrage: Women fought for their right to vote and be treated equally to men through resistance tactics such as picketing, hunger strikes, and civil disobedience. The 19th Amendment to the US Constitution, which granted women the right to vote, was ratified in 1920.
3. LGBTQ+ Rights: Members of the LGBTQ+ community have used resistance tactics such as protests, direct action, and legal challenges to fight against discrimination and advocate for equality. These efforts have led to significant gains in recent decades, including the legalization of same-sex marriage in many countries.
4. Environmentalism: Environmental activists have used resistance tactics such as protests, sit-ins, and civil disobedience to advocate for conservation, sustainability, and climate justice. These efforts have led to the creation of environmental regulations and protections, and increased awareness of the need for action to address climate change.
In each of these examples, resistance has been used as a means to challenge existing power structures and push for change, leading to progress toward greater freedom, equality, and democracy.
Instances of united resistance to challenge oppressive governments, asserting the right to freedom, equality and democracy, have been present since the beginning of recorded history.
Throughout human history, oppressed populations have used a diverse range of tactics to resist their oppressors. These have ranged from peaceful protests and conversations to civil disobedience and armed revolt.'
Throughout history, resistance has been one of the most powerful tools utilized by groups striving for freedom, equality and democracy.
Examples of resistance include peaceful protest and civil disobedience, legal challenges, strikes and boycotts, and direct action. By engaging in collective acts of resistance, individuals can stand up for their rights and demand justice.
Additionally, resistance can be used to resist oppressive systems, particularly those that perpetuate inequality and injustice—by challenging oppressive laws, challenging unjust policies, and engaging in street protests and other forms of activism. Ultimately, through resistance, people can exercise their rights to freedom and justice, and fight for a fairer and more democratic society.
To know more about democracy, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30466950
#SPJ2
Which best describes Justice Marshall’s view of the United States government?
It has not required any changes over the years.
It has promoted equal opportunity for all from the start.
It has not always upheld the ideals of the Constitution.
It was flawed from the beginning and cannot be fixed.
C. Justice Marshall's perspective on the government of the United States best describes how it has not always upheld the Constitution's ideals.
What ideals did John Marshall hold?Marshall was guided by a firm belief in the supremacy of the national government over state legislatures and a strong commitment to the power of the judiciary. The Federalist political program was very much in line with his judicial vision. A transcending figure in American lawful history, John Marshall filled in as boss equity of the US High Court for over thirty years, during which time he helped increment the power and glory of the Government court framework.
Equity Thurgood Marshall's perspective on the US government is that it was imperfect all along and required a few corrections, a nationwide conflict, and earth shattering social change to achieve the arrangement of established government and regard for individual opportunities and common liberties are major today.
To learn more about Marshall visit :
https://brainly.com/question/1962198
#SPJ1
Which of the following best describes Roosevelt’s leadership approach?
a. He was direct and decisive
b. He avoided conflict
c. He made promises he couldn’t keep
d. He was slow to suggest change
what does the US constitution begin with?
Answer: the constitution begins with the preamble
Explanation: "We the People of the United States"
the strike tactic used by general motors employees in 1937 would later be used in alexandria, virginia where a group of young black me did the same in ______________________________.
The strike tactic used by General Motors employees in 1937 is known as the sit-down strike, which involves workers occupying their workplace to protest and demand better working conditions, higher wages, or other grievances.
This tactic proved to be successful in securing workers' rights, and it inspired other groups to follow suit.In 1939, a group of young black men in Alexandria, Virginia, organized a sit-in strike at the segregated Alexandria Library to protest against racial segregation and discrimination. The strike lasted for several months and gained national attention, leading to changes in the library's policies and the desegregation of public libraries in Alexandria.This sit-in strike in Alexandria was one of the earliest examples of the civil rights movement in the United States, and it demonstrated the power of peaceful protests and civil disobedience in effecting change. The tactics used by these young men were later adopted by other civil rights activists, including the famous sit-ins at Woolworth's lunch counter in Greensboro, North Carolina, in 1960.
Learn more about employees here:
https://brainly.com/question/21847040
#SPJ11
1. what country is located of 30° N latitude and 60° E longitude?
2. what county is located of 22° N latitude and 105° W longitude?
3. what county is located of 30° S latitude and 30° E longitude?
4. what county is located of 0° latitude and 15° W longitude?
5. what county is located of 5° N latitude and 75° W longitude?
pls help me . . . . . . .. . . .
18. Ibn Battuta traveled widely across the Middle East, South Asia, Southeast Asia, and Africa in the fourteenth
century. His travels serve as evidence for the
A unifying influence of Islam
B
excellent condition of roads in Africa and Asia
political unity of Africa and Asia
D
widespread use of paper money
Ibn Battuta's travels in the fourteenth century were significant in providing evidence for the unifying influence of Islam. The correct option is A.
During his extensive travels, he encountered people of diverse cultures, languages, and beliefs, yet found that their shared faith in Islam provided a common ground for interaction and exchange.
This is particularly evident in his accounts of his travels to various Muslim societies, such as in the Middle East and Southeast Asia, where he was able to integrate into local communities and find acceptance among fellow Muslims.
His accounts also highlight the spread of Islamic culture, ideas, and practices across different regions, as well as the role of Islamic institutions, such as mosques and madrasas, in promoting education and scholarship.
Overall, Ibn Battuta's travels demonstrate the significance of Islam in shaping and connecting the diverse societies he encountered, and its role as a unifying force in the medieval world.
The correct option is A.
To learn more about evidence click on,
https://brainly.com/question/28699625
#SPJ4
which statement correctly matches the person with the role he played during the vietnam war? responses
Lyndon B. Johnson was the U.S. President who escalated American involvement in the Vietnam War, and General William Westmoreland was the commander of U.S. forces during the conflict.
John McCain was a Navy pilot who served in the Vietnam War. Military service of John McCain, From Navy Brat to POW. He was a distinguished, if occasionally careless, fighter pilot who made nearly twenty bombing sorties in Vietnam before being shot down, taken prisoner, and subjected to torture. John Sidney McCain III, an American Navy lieutenant and future senator, in the early 1960s. On August 29, 1936, John Sidney McCain III was born at Coco Solo, close to Colón, in the Panama Canal Zone. His father and grandpa both served in the navy and were U.S. Naval Academy graduates. These two great individuals formed and impacted John III's whole naval career.
To know more about lieutenant refer :
brainly.com/question/30273043
#SPJ11
the policy most favored by white westerners during the early 1800s was to *
Answer:
acquire the land occupied by Indian tribes and move the Indians west.
Explanation:
barrels for wine storage were invented by the . group of answer choices gaels greeks romans egyptians
Answer:
Gauls
Explanation:
what was/were the requirement(s) of sankin kotai? group of answer choices wives of every daimyo lived every other year in edo. every daimyo lived permanently in edo. heirs of every daimyo lived permanently in edo. every daimyo lived every other year in edo. heirs of every daimyo lived every other year in edo. wives of every daimyo lived permanently in edo.
The requirement of sankin kotai was that every daimyo had to live every other year permanently in Edo with their wives and heirs.
The requirement of sankin kotai was that every daimyo lived every other year in Edo. This system aimed to maintain control over the daimyos and prevent any potential uprising. The sankin kotaisystem required the daimyoin to go to and maintain estates in Edo, which used up a significant portion of their revenue. This placed a heavy financial strain on them. However, the system's implementation led to a significant amount of political and cultural homogeneity over all of Japan. The custom originally got its start unofficially during the Toyotomi Hideyoshi era (1585–1598), but Tokugawa Iemitsu codified it into law in 1635. Actually, the tozama or "outside" daimyo were the only ones to whom the first sankin-kotai law applied. This arrangement mandated that daimyo spend alternate years in their home provinces and in Edo, the Tokugawa government's capital.
To know more about sankin kotai refer :
brainly.com/question/27499967
#SPJ11
Read the excerpt from an 1852 speech by Italian statesman Giuseppe Mazzini on Lombardy, a region of Italy that was ruled by Austria at the time. [Lombardy] struggled, they still struggle. . . For country and liberty;. . . They speak the same language, they bear about them the impress of consanguinity [common ancestors], they kneel beside the same tombs, they glory in the same tradition; and they demand to associate freely, without obstacles, without foreign domination
–Giuseppe Mazzini, On Nationality, 1852
Which summarizes Mazzini’s argument about independence for Lombardy?
Lombardy had some of the common bonds required of an independent nation-state, but not enough. Lombardy should not struggle for independence because it had strong bonds with Austria. Lombardy should be an independent nation-state because it had a strong national identity. Lombardy should not be kept from enjoying personal independence because of Austria’s actions
Mazzini argued that Lombardy should be allowed to achieve personal independence from Austria because it had the common bonds necessary for a nation-state, such as common language, common traditions and shared ancestors.
He argued that the people of Lombardy should not be kept from freely associating with each other because of foreign domination. He believed the people of Lombardy should struggle for country and liberty, and be allowed to enjoy their own personal independence.
Mazzini's argument for independence for Lombardy was based on the idea that the region had the bonds necessary to be an autonomous nation-state, and that it should not be kept from enjoying its own personal independence by foreign domination.
To know more about Mazzini , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/7365706
#SPJ4
PART A: Which of the following statements best describes the social structure of free male citizens in ancient Greece?
The correct answer is D. Class in ancient Greece for free men was determined by one's citizenship, business/trade, and whether they had the full right to vote.
What is citizenship?Citizenship is the status of a person recognized under the custom or law of a state or a nation, as a member of the state or nation, with rights and duties. It entails a set of rights, such as the right to vote, the right to receive state protection and the right to participate in the affairs of the state. It also includes the duties of citizens to respect the laws, defend the country, pay taxes and uphold the nation's values and traditions.
The four divisions of men in ancient Greece were the nobles, the secondary class, the middle class, and the foreigners. Nobles were those who had a hereditary right to participate in the public life of their city-state. The secondary class consisted of independent farmers and small landowners. The middle class was comprised of merchants, craftsmen, and tradesmen. Lastly, the foreigners were non-citizens who lived in the country without the full right to vote.
To learn more about citizenship
https://brainly.com/question/25990409
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
1. PART A: Which of the following statements best describes the social structure of free male citizens in ancient Greece?
A Life for men in ancient Greece was divided into two categories: free and enslaved—class did not matter as much as this.
B There were three divisions of free men in ancient Greece: the nobles, the secondary landowning class, and the middle business class.
C There were four divisions of men in ancient Greece: the nobles, the secondary class, the middle class, and the foreigners.
D Class in ancient Greece for free men was determined by one's citizenship, business/trade, and whether they had the full right to vote.
congress rejects american membership in the league of nations the kellogg-briand pact of 1928 the neutrality acts of 1936-37 charles lindbergh and the america first committee which would make the best title for a research paper about these topics?
"The Isolationist Policies of the United States in the Interwar Period: Examining Congress' Rejection of the League of Nations, Kellogg-Briand Pact, Neutrality Acts, and the America First Committee." is an apt title for this research paper.
A foreign policy stance known as isolationism emphasizes a country's independence and lack of participation in international events, especially in military alliances and conflicts. Following the destruction of World War I, many Americans in the interwar era thought that the United States should concentrate on home matters and stay out of foreign conflicts.
Isolationist views were prevalent in the US during this time, as seen by the Neutrality Acts of 1936–1937, the Kellogg–Briand Pact of 1928, and the rejection of American inclusion in the League of Nations. After World War I, the League of Nations was established to foster international cooperation and avert future conflicts; however, the United States Congress refused to join the group out of worry over losing authority over foreign policy choices.
To learn more about Isolationist Policies, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/30126137
#SPJ4
54
On the fourth day at sea, the
three friends sat on the deck. They
were doing homework. Suddenly, thunder
boomed. Rain pounded onto the deck. High
waves began to rock the ship. The friends hurried
indoors. They struggled to walk steadily.
At last the three reached Juan and Ted's cabin.
"Whew!" said Ted. "How could a storm come up
that fast?"
Juan smiled. He knew the answer! "A warm front
and a cold front came together," he said. "It was on
the weather map we studied earlier."
"Cool!" said Kim. "We get to live what we're
learning."
READ & RESPOND
"Our scienc
For the
laughing
learned a
Mom
have to.
going to
by Ping Copery
Figurative Languag
What examples of onomatopoeia do you see on this page? How do they help you
picture what is happening in the story?
The examples of onomatopoeia in the passage are "thunder boomed," and "rain pounded". These words create auditory imagery for the reader, helping them to imagine the loud and intense storm that the characters are experiencing.
What is an onomatopoeia?Is a figure of speech in which words are used to imitate or suggest the sounds that are associated with the objects or actions they refer to. In other words, it's a word that phonetically imitates the sound of the thing it describes. Examples of onomatopoeic words include "buzz," "clang," "sizzle," "murmur," "hiss," "crunch," "splash," and "thud."
Therefore, the use of onomatopoeia can add vividness, rhythm, and humor to language, and can help to create a more engaging sensory experience for the reader or listener.
Find out more about onomatopoeia at:
https://brainly.com/question/405575
#SPJ1
How did the Japanese Empire use war to advance their goals in the 1930s
In the 1930s, the Japanese Empire used war as a tool to advance their imperialistic goals and expand their influence in Asia. The Japanese government believed in the idea of "Asia for the Asians," and sought to establish a sphere of influence in East Asia to counter the domination of the Western powers.
How do the prisoners quoted in this reading describe the process of killing at Auschwitz? Who was involved in the killing? Why do you think the Nazis forced other prisoners (the Sonderkommandos) to assist in the murders? Why were Sonderkommandos killed and replaced every few months?
Auschwitz was network of concentration and extermination camps established by Nazi Germany in occupied Poland during World War II.
What is extermination?Extermination refers to the deliberate and systematic killing of a particular group, species, or population, often with the intention of completely eradicating it. This can include acts such as genocide, where a specific ethnic or religious group is targeted for elimination, or the extermination of a particular species, often due to human activities such as deforestation or hunting. The term can also be used to describe the intentional killing of pests, such as insects or rodents, in order to control their populations. Extermination is a controversial and often morally charged concept, with many arguing that it is never justified to intentionally wipe out an entire group or species.
To learn more about extermination, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/3855932
#SPJ1
Which was an effect of the Emancipación Proclamation on the course of the Civil War?
Answer:
Emancipation would redefine the Civil War, turning it from a struggle to preserve the Union to one focused on ending slavery
Explanation: