Moral relativism, also known as moral skepticism, is the view that moral truths are relative to individuals or cultures, and that there are no objective moral standards that apply universally.
The arguments for moral relativism include the observation that moral beliefs and practices vary widely across cultures and history, suggesting that there are no universal moral standards.
Moral relativists also argue that individuals have the right to decide what is morally right or wrong for themselves, as long as it does not harm others.
Learn more about Moral relativism, here
https://brainly.com/question/14546755
#SPJ1
When it comes to war... a Abraham Lincoln does NOT want to fire the first shot b Abraham Lincoln will not ever fire back on the South c Abraham Lincoln wants the North to fire the first shot d Abraham Lincoln wants to teach the South a lesson
When it comes to war... a Abraham Lincoln does NOT want to fire the first shot.
What is the war?Lincoln was decided to protect the Union, and to do so he thought he must take a stand against the Confederacy. He concluded he might as well take this stand at Sumter. Lincoln's essential point was not one or the other to incite war nor to preserve peace.
Therefore, In an April 9 letter to the common, Lincoln said that another major subject of his military strategy: the war may well be won as it were by battling the adversary instead of by perpetual maneuvers and attacks to possess places.
Learn more about war from
https://brainly.com/question/197175
#SPJ1
In your OWN words, summarize what happened to the titans at the end of the roaring 20s and the Great Depression.
you need to explore what “appeasement” was in regard to Hitler’s actions in the 1930s and discuss a couple of examples. Make sure to include the response of the leaders from France and Great Britain at the time and why you believe they acted as they did. This is hypothetical…but how should the world have possibly reacted instead?
Answer:
Appeasement was a policy adopted by European powers towards Hitler's actions in the 1930s, which involved giving in to his demands in an attempt to avoid war. The policy was motivated by the fear of another world war, given the devastation caused by World War I, and the belief that Hitler's demands were reasonable and could be satisfied without the need for military action.
One example of appeasement was the Munich Agreement of 1938, in which France and Great Britain agreed to let Germany annex the Sudetenland region of Czechoslovakia, with the hope that this would satisfy Hitler's territorial ambitions and prevent war. Another example was the Anschluss of Austria, in which Germany annexed Austria in 1938 without any significant opposition from other European powers.
The response of the leaders from France and Great Britain at the time was to adopt a policy of appeasement towards Hitler's aggressive actions. The French leader, Édouard Daladier, and the British Prime Minister, Neville Chamberlain, believed that appeasement would prevent another devastating war and that Hitler's territorial demands were reasonable.
However, this policy of appeasement ultimately failed, as Hitler continued to expand his territory and increase his military power. The invasion of Poland in 1939 finally led to the outbreak of World War II.
In hindsight, the world should have reacted differently to Hitler's actions in the 1930s. Instead of appeasement, a more firm and united response from European powers, particularly France and Great Britain, could have deterred Hitler and prevented the outbreak of war. For instance, economic sanctions or a military alliance could have been formed to counter Hitler's aggression. The lack of a strong and united response allowed Hitler to pursue his ambitions and ultimately led to the devastation of World War II.
Which of the following contributed to the Rwandan Genocide?
O European colonists continued to control the economy in Rwanda
O European colonists took back control of the Rwandan government
O European colonial policies had reinforced ethnic prejudices
O The threat of terrorism and nuclear war led to ethnic tensions
The option that contributed to the Rwandan Genocide is European colonial policies had reinforced ethnic prejudices
What is the Rwandan Genocide?Rwanda was under the governance of Germany and subsequently Belgium throughout the epoch of European colonization. An ethnic hierarchy was established by the colonial powers through their preference of the Tutsi minority while overlooking the larger Hutu population.
Therefore, By issuing identity cards categorized by ethnicity, the colonial authorities strengthened the differentiation between the two factions. These regulations caused the emergence of ingrained biases and agitation among different ethnic groups, etc.
Learn more about Rwandan Genocide from
https://brainly.com/question/27330411
#SPJ1
Think & Review Question
Answer the questions using a complete sentence.
- Explain why Mexico decided to break away from Spanish rule. Studies weekly
Mexicans decided to leave the Spanish Empire because they thought they were overlooked and not treated correctly. They also felt powerless to influence what occurred in their nation.
Several factors led Mexico to decide to secede from Spanish dominion. Napoleon's invasion of Spain in 1808 resulted in a political vacuum that opened the door for independence as Mexico's creole elites grew more apprehensive of Spain.
Similar to the struggle for American independence from British domination in the late 18th century, many Mexicans desired independence from Spain by the 19th century and the establishment of a sovereign government that would act in their own interests.
As a result, the significance of the Mexico decided to break away from Spanish rule are the aforementioned.
Learn more about on Mexico, here:
https://brainly.com/question/10938609
#SPJ1
(1) What is a political party? What is a proportional representation system? What is a “winner takes all system?” Would you prefer a winner takes all or proportional representation system in the United States? Why did you prefer one system to the other?
(2) What is a primary election? What is a general election?
(3) What are the statistics of race, gender, religion, education levels, region, and age identifications of the Democratic Party and Republican Party? In other words, who generally votes for which party?
(4) What do you believe (your personal opinion) can be done to change the volatile political situation in the U.S.?
(1) A political party is an organized group of individuals with similar political beliefs and goals that seek to gain political power and influence through elections.
Proportional representation is a voting system in which seats in an elected body are allocated based on the proportion of votes received by a political party or candidate.
A "winner takes all" system is a voting system in which the candidate with the most votes wins the election, regardless of whether they receive a majority or not.
(2) A primary election is a preliminary round of voting where political parties choose their candidate for the general election. A general election is a national election where voters choose their representatives to hold public office.
(3) The Democratic Party tends to attract more voters who are non-white, female, less religious, more educated, and younger, while the Republican Party tends to attract more voters who are white, male, more religious, less educated, and older.
(4) Emphasis on civility, empathy, and collaboration in political discourse is needed to change the volatile political situation in the U.S. Politicians and voters need to prioritize the common good over party loyalty by listening and considering opposing viewpoints.
Learn more about general election here:
https://brainly.com/question/11185151
#SPJ1
What is the first step too amending the constitution
Answer: Step 1. Passage by Congress.
Explanation: Proposed amendment language must be approved by a two-thirds vote of both houses.
You can find out more about amending the constitution at the National Conference of State Legislatures' website, ncsl.org.
Any agreement or effort between two parties
Any agreement or effort between two parties is called a Bilateral effort or a Bilateral agreement.
Agreements or efforts can take many forms, such as a contract, a treaty, a memorandum of understanding, or a joint venture. The terms of agreement or effort may be negotiated and agreed upon through formal or informal discussions and may be binding or non-binding depending on the circumstances and the parties involved.
Examples of bilateral agreements could include a business partnership, a divorce settlement, a labor contract, a loan agreement or a peace treaty between two countries. Such agreements or efforts can be important for achieving common goals, resolving disputes or establishing mutual benefits.
To learn more about the agreement visit:
brainly.com/question/15420974
The correct question is-
What is the term for "Any agreement or effort between two parties"?
Which sentence best describes the Battle of Bunker Hill?
A It was a victory for the Patriots after they were able to sink many British ships crossing the Charles River.
BThe Patriots had plenty of gunpowder, but were defeated by a British naval bombardment.
C The British attacked head-on and eventually won the hills, but only after losing more than a thousand men.
The British attacked head-on and eventually won the hills, but only after losing more than a thousand men.
D British soldiers ran out of gunpowder and fled after the Patriots started to advance across the Charles River.
The sentence that best described Bunker Hill battle was C The British attacked head-on and eventually won the hills, but only after losing more than a thousand men.
What happened at Bunker Hill ?On June 17, 1775, at the beginning of the American Revolution, the British Army, led by General William Howe, waged war against colonial militia on Breed's Hill in Charlestown, Massachusetts. This fortified point was frequently known as Bunker Hill.
In spite of their ammunition shortage and being outnumbered, the colonists managed to cause substantial harm to the English troops resulting in over a thousand casualties, with many officers among them. Nevertheless, due to limited supplies, the colonists evacuated the hill, enabling the British army to seize it, thus claiming triumph in the battle.
Find out more on Bunker Hill at https://brainly.com/question/15152623
#SPJ1
will chose brainlest, write something about war.
War is a devastation and complication that has afflicted human history for generations. It causes devastation, pain, and death, as well as political and societal turmoil. Warfare continues to occur, despite numerous technical improvements and diplomatic efforts to prevent it, inflicting wounds that can remain for centuries. War affects not only those immediately involved in the fight, but also civilians and future generations. It serves as a reminder of the need of working for global peace, diplomacy, and understanding.
War is a destructive and devastating force that has plagued humanity for centuries. It involves armed conflict between nations or groups, resulting in immense loss of lives, destruction of property, and long-term socio-economic consequences. Historically, wars have been fought for various reasons such as territorial expansion, political power, resources, religious beliefs, or ideological differences. Despite advances in technology and international diplomacy, wars continue to occur, often with catastrophic consequences.
The impact of war is far-reaching, affecting not only the combatants but also innocent civilians, including women and children. It tears apart families, communities, and entire nations, leaving a lasting legacy of trauma, grief, and suffering. War also drains resources from society and diverts precious funds to military expenditure, at the expense of health, education, and social welfare needs. Moreover, it exacerbates existing inequalities, perpetuates human rights violations, and fuels extremism and terrorism. Therefore, it is essential to promote peace, diplomacy, and non-violent conflict resolution, rather than resorting to the deadly and destructive option of war.
Hope This Helps!
Describe the first uniforms. Why might have that been the design choice? Do you agree to
disagree with that choice? Why or why not?
trena
Answer:
I believe that it is possible to agree to disagree with someone's choice, as long as both parties are respectful of each other's opinions and can maintain a healthy relationship despite their differences. It is important to recognize that not everyone will share the same views or make the same choices, and that diversity of thought and perspective can lead to growth and understanding.
Explanation:
Huey Long’s “share our wealth” plan is often compared to president Roosevelt’s “new deal. “ choose all features that describe BOTH of these plans.
Several descriptions are shared by Huey Long's "Share Our Wealth" mission and President Roosevelt's "New Deal": their focus on fighting poverty and financial inequality.
features that describe BOTH of these plans.Both initiatives catered to those enduring the Great Depression with proposals of government inducement in the economy, investments in public sector projects, reforms of banking and finance sectors, higher taxes levied on wealthy class and business entities, plus incentives intended to develop the economy and generate jobs.
Nevertheless, these plans been heavily criticized for being too unrefined or extreme in their outlooks.
Read more on Huey Long here:https://brainly.com/question/27335556
#SPJ1
What is the name of the twin who became the first king of Rome?
Answer:
Remus.
Explanation:
According to Roman mythology, the twin brothers who founded Rome were named Romulus and Remus. Romulus eventually became the first king of Rome.
Easy 70 points please help.
How does Distributions of Population help or affect you. Consider the following:
● changes in urban-rural population
● patterns of migrations
● population density
2-3 sentences for each bullet points
How did Lee Kuan Yew bring Singapore into the modern age? List some of his policies.
What happened as a result of Spain's early exploration of the New World?
O A. Spain worked with other European countries to set up colonies.
OB. Spain was able to keep other European countries from settling in
Canada.
OC. Spain was able to establish colonies in large areas of both
continents.
O D. Spain developed good relations with the native populations.
B. Spain was able to establish colonies in large areas of both continents.
Explain the organs of the following names:Christopolis,Monrovia and Liberia
Answer:
Christopolis is not the name of an actual city or organ. However, "Christo" is a Greek word meaning "anointed one" or "messiah", and "polis" means "city". Therefore, "Christopolis" could be interpreted as a hypothetical city named after Jesus Christ.
Monrovia is the capital city of Liberia, a country located in West Africa. Monrovia was named after James Monroe, the fifth President of the United States, who played a significant role in the founding of Liberia in the early 19th century. The city serves as the political, economic, and cultural center of Liberia, and is home to several important institutions such as the University of Liberia and the National Museum of Liberia.
Liberia is a West African country bordered by Sierra Leone, Guinea, Côte d'Ivoire, and the Atlantic Ocean. Founded in 1847 as a republic for freed American slaves, it boasts a rich heritage, beautiful beaches, dense rainforests, and diverse wildlife. Home to over 4 million people, Liberia's capital city is Monrovia.
What surprised Ibn Battuta about the status and/or treatment of Mongol women?
Brigham Young
is associated
with which
Christian faith
that
experienced
religious
intolerance?
A. Mormons
B. Judaism
C. Protestants
D. Baptists
Answer: mormons
Explanation:
Alot of points please help.
Pick 2 POSITIVE and 2 NEGATIVE effects of Industrialization Include a 2-3 sentence explanation to analyze each positive and negative effect of industrialization. Provide details and examples to support your opinion.
Answer:
Positive Effects of Industrialization:
1. Economic Growth: Industrialization led to the development of new industries and manufacturing processes, which created job opportunities, increased productivity, and boosted economic growth. For example, the Industrial Revolution in Europe led to a significant increase in productivity, as factories were able to produce goods on a larger scale, resulting in a more efficient use of resources and increased wealth.
2. Technological Advancement: Industrialization also brought about significant technological advancements, such as the invention of the steam engine, which facilitated the transportation of goods and people over longer distances, and the development of new communication technologies. This allowed for greater interconnectedness and the spread of ideas, as well as improvements in healthcare, education, and other areas.
Negative Effects of Industrialization:
1. Environmental Degradation: The rapid industrialization of the 19th and 20th centuries led to significant environmental degradation, including air and water pollution, deforestation, and depletion of natural resources. For example, the pollution caused by factories and industrial processes has been linked to increased rates of respiratory illnesses and other health problems.
2. Exploitation of Workers: Industrialization also led to the exploitation of workers, particularly in the early stages of industrialization when labor laws were weak or non-existent. Workers were often forced to work long hours in unsafe and unsanitary conditions, with little pay or benefits. This exploitation resulted in a number of labor movements and protests, as workers sought better working conditions and rights.
In conclusion, while industrialization brought about significant positive changes, such as economic growth and technological advancement, it also had negative effects, such as environmental degradation and worker exploitation. It is important to recognize both the positive and negative impacts of industrialization in order to address its consequences and work towards a more sustainable and equitable future.
Explanation:
What led to uncertainly about the future of the European Union
Answer: between the EU and its wider global environment, between unity and deep diversity, and between different modes of political economy and levels of development.
Explanation:
Use excerpts below to answer
a) Briefly explain ONE major difference between Bailey's and Patterson's interpretations.
b) Briefly explain how someone supporting Bailey's interpretation could use ONE piece of evidence from the period between 1945 and 1955 not directly mentioned in the excerpt.
c) Briefly explain how someone supporting Patterson's interpretation could use ONE piece of evidence from the period between 1945 and 1955 not directly mentioned in the excerpt.
Answer:
a) Briefly explain ONE major difference between Bailey's and Patterson's interpretations. Bailey's interpretation emphasizes the importance of social context in shaping behavior, while Patterson's interpretation focuses on the role of reinforcement in behavior modification.
b) Briefly explain how someone supporting Bailey's interpretation could use ONE piece of evidence from the period between 1945 and 1955 not directly mentioned in the excerpt. For instance, they could point to the fact that during this period, the United States government implemented policies aimed at containing the spread of communism, both domestically and abroad. This could be seen as evidence supporting Baileys interpretation that the Cold War was a result of American imperialism and expansionism.
c) Briefly explain how someone supporting Patterson's interpretation could use ONE piece of evidence from the period between 1945 and 1955 not directly mentioned in the excerpt. For instance, someone supporting Patterson's interpretation could use the fact that during this period, African Americans continued to face discrimination and segregation in various aspects of their lives, such as education and housing. This evidence supports Patterson's argument that the civil rights movement was necessary to challenge and dismantle these unjust systems.
Explanation:
A chart shows a stock price model graph labeled the price of the stock in dollars along the y-axis and time in a day along the x-axis.
Based on the stock price model, what is the best prediction of what the price will do next?
A.
hold value
B.
keep increasing
C.
start decreasing
D.
no way to predict
A chart shows a stock price model graph labeled the price of the stock in dollars along the y-axis and time in a day along the x-axis.
Based on the stock price model, no way to predict is the right answer.
Option d is correct
The price of a stock can be influenced by many different factors, including but not limited to company earnings, market trends, geopolitical events, and investor sentiment. These factors can change rapidly and unpredictably, making it difficult to forecast future stock price movements.
It's important to note that there are various technical and fundamental analysis tools and techniques that traders and investors use to make educated guesses about where a stock price may be headed, but these are not foolproof methods of predicting future price movements. Therefore, option D - no way to predict - is the most accurate answer to the question of what the stock price will do next.
To know more about stock price model here
https://brainly.com/question/929974
#SPJ1
Explain in 2-4 sentences how the Federal Reserve plays a part in the circular flow model.
The Federal Reserve plays a key role in the circular flow model of the economy by regulating the money supply, which affects both households and businesses.
By adjusting interest rates and implementing monetary policy, the Federal Reserve can influence the amount of money flowing through the economy and the level of economic activity. This can impact the behavior of consumers and businesses, ultimately affecting the circular flow of goods, services, and money in the economy. The Federal Reserve also supervises and regulates banks and other financial institutions, which help to keep the financial system stable and promote the flow of credit in the economy.
Therefore, the Federal Reserve plays a crucial role in the circular flow model.
Learn more about Federal Reserve, here:
https://brainly.com/question/3603615
#SPJ1
to what extent did the development of African diaspora contribute to emergency of pan Africanism in 1900
Answer:
The development of African diaspora played a significant role in the emergence of pan-Africanism in 1900. It brought together people of African descent from different parts of the world, who shared a common history and experience of oppression, and provided a platform for them to unite and fight for their rights.
Explanation:
Is elitism in the new democratic South Africa helping to maintain apartheid-era privileges?
Answer:
No, elitism in the new democratic South Africa is not helping to maintain apartheid-era privileges. In fact, the new governing elite mistakenly believes that the goal of a democratic South Africa is simply to extend to everyone what whites enjoyed under apartheid, which is a false premise. South Africa needs new thinking for its democracy to work for all. However, the monomaniacal focus on corruption, unthinkingly encouraged by much of the media, has created a situation in which there is a general elite consensus that corruption is our enemy, which is hindering the progress of democracy. The transition away from apartheid changed South Africa in a remarkable way, defying international expectations. South Africa's first democratic election with universal suffrage in 1994 was a success story for democracy.
No, elitism in the new democratic South Africa is not helping to maintain apartheid era privileges. In fact, the new governing elite mistakenly believes that the goal of a democratic South Africa is simply to extend to everyone what whites enjoyed under apartheid, which is a false premise.
How does elitism in the new democratic South Africa help to maintain apartheid-era privilege?No, elitism in the new democratic South Africa is not assisting in the preservation of apartheid-era privileges. In fact, the new ruling class incorrectly believes that the goal of a democratic South Africa is simply to extend to everyone what whites enjoyed under apartheid, which is a false premise. South Africa needs new thinking for its democracy to work for all. However, the monomaniacal focus on corruption, unthinkingly encouraged by much of the media, has created a situation in which there is a general elite consensus that corruption is our enemy, which is hindering the progress of democracy.
The transition away from apartheid changed South Africa in a remarkable way, defying international expectations. South Africa's first democratic election with universal suffrage in 1994 was a success story for democracy.
Learn more about elitism, here:
https://brainly.com/question/31894293
#SPJ2
"The Holocaust is one of the biggest tragedies of the 20 century. It has plundered an entire nation has taken millions of lives and has changed the history of mankind". In the context of the above statement, evaluate the impact of pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation by the Nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1946.
Answer:
The pseudoscientific ideas of race propagated by Nazi Germany led to the dehumanization and persecution of Jews, resulting in the Holocaust, one of the greatest tragedies in history.
Explanation:
Which city was the first capital of the United States?
How does an amendment get added to the Constitution?
1. A state convention must be called to propose an amendment. It then must be voted on by the people to achieve ratification.
2. It gets proposed by the states and then passes through Congress with a two-thirds majority vote before being voted on by citizens.
3. It must pass the House and Senate with a two-thirds majority and then be ratified by three-fourths of the states.
4. It must pass through the House first and then get approved by three-fourths of the states before heading to the Senate.
Answer:
The correct answer is 3. An amendment to the Constitution must be proposed by a two-thirds vote in both the House of Representatives and the Senate, or by a convention called for by two-thirds of the state legislatures. Then, the proposed amendment must be ratified by three-fourths of the states (38 out of 50) either through their legislatures or through special state conventions.
This process is outlined in Article V of the United States Constitution, which provides two methods for proposing amendments and two methods for ratifying them. The method of proposal and ratification used for each amendment depends on the circumstances and preferences of the time.
Explanation:
3. It must pass the House and Senate with a two-thirds majority and then be ratified by three-fourths of the states. Hope this helps! :)
Over which of the following does the Supreme Court have original jurisdiction?
1.) a case in which citizens of one state challenge citizens of another state
2.) a case in which a person robs a grocery store
3.) a case in which an individual is accused of murdering someone
Answer:
Explanation:
1.) a case in which citizens of one state challenge citizens of another state.
The Constitution grants the Supreme Court original jurisdiction in cases involving disputes between two or more states, also known as "cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls, and those in which a state shall be a party." Therefore, the Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over a case in which citizens of one state challenge citizens of another state.
The Supreme Court generally does not have original jurisdiction in criminal cases, such as a case in which a person robs a grocery store or an individual is accused of murdering someone.