What is the value of n

The measure of the given arc HJK is 186°.

Given measurement of the angle G = (4y - 11)°

The measurement of the angle J = (3y + 9)°

The measurement of the angle K = (x + 21)°

The measurement of the angle H = 2x°

From the below attached pic rule, in the given diagram angle J + angle G = 180°

So, J + G = 180°

= (4y - 11)° +  (3y + 9)° = 180°

= 7y -2 = 180°

= 7y = 182°

y = 182°/7 = 26°

By substituting y value which is "26°" in the angle G and J we can obtain their measurements as angle G = 93° and angle J = 87°.

Similarly, to find the value of x,

H + K = 180°

2x + (x + 21)° = 180°

3x + 21° = 180°

3x = 159°

x = 159°/3 = 53°.

By substituting x value which is "53°" in the angle H and K we can obtain their measurements as angle H = 106° and angle K = 74°

To find the measurement of arc, from the second attached image we can know that the angle of G is opposite to arc HJK. So, the relation is as follows,

measurement of arc HJK = 2 * angle of G

HJK = 2 * 93°

HJK = 186°.

From the above solution, we can conclude that the measurement of arc HJK is 186°

To know more about the arcs,

https://brainly.com/question/28108430

#SPJ1

Answer:

LJ = 13.12

Step-by-step explanation:

given the triangles are similar then the ratios of corresponding sides are in proportion, that is

[tex]\frac{LJ}{ZX}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{JK}{XY}[/tex] ( substitute values )

[tex]\frac{LJ}{8.2}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{13.92}{8.7}[/tex] ( cross- multiply )

8.7 × LJ = 8.2 × 13.92 = 114.144 ( divide both sides by 8.7 )

LJ = [tex]\frac{114.144}{8.7}[/tex] = 13.12

There is not enough evidence to conclude that the average time spent on leisure activities by American adults has changed. Sample standard deviation (s) is 8.984 hours. Sample mean (x') is 19.9 hours per week

To test whether the claim that American adults spend an average of 18 hours per week on leisure activities is true or false, we can conduct a hypothesis test.

First, we need to define the null and alternative hypotheses. Let µ be the population mean time spent on leisure activities by American adults.

Null hypothesis: µ = 18 hours per week

Alternative hypothesis: µ ≠ 18 hours per week

We can then calculate the sample mean and standard deviation from the data given as follows:

Sample mean (x') = (13+4+15+9+21+42+15+34+20+6) / 10 = 19.9 hours per week

Sample standard deviation (s) = 8.984 hours

Next, we can calculate the test statistic (t-value) using the formula:

t = (x' - µ) / (s / √(n))

where n is the sample size (10).

Using a t-distribution with 9 degrees of freedom (n-1), we can find the critical t-value at a 5% significance level to be ±2.306.

We calculate the t-value as:

t = (19.9 - 18) / (8.984 / √(10)) = 0.911

Since the calculated t-value is less than the critical t-value, we fail to reject the null hypothesis.

In other words, the claim that American adults spend an average of 18 hours per week on leisure activities is not contradicted by the sample data.

To learn more about normally distributed click on,

https://brainly.com/question/23971746

#SPJ4

Possible endpoint for the fence, if the rancher started at point A and completed seven-ninths of the way to point B, is approximately (2.34, 5.19).

The distance from point B to point A can be found using the distance formula:

d = √[(x2 - x1)² + (y2 - y1)²]

where (x1, y1) = (0, 0) and (x2, y2) = (3, 6):

d = √[(3 - 0)² + (6 - 0)²] = √(9 + 36) = √45

To find the coordinates of point A, we need to count seven-ninths of this distance from point B:

7/9 × √45 ≈ 3.21

Starting from point B (3, 6), we can move 3.21 units in the direction of point A. We can find the coordinates of point A by subtracting this distance from the coordinates of point B:

x-coordinate of A: 3 - 7/9 × 3 ≈ 1.67

y-coordinate of A: 6 - 7/9 × 6 ≈ 4.67

So the current possible endpoint for the fence, if the rancher started at point B and completed seven-ninths of the way to point A, is approximately (1.67, 4.67).

To find the other possible endpoint, we need to determine the coordinates of point B. Since the rancher started at one of the endpoints of the fence section and has completed seven-ninths of the way to point A, the current length of the fence section is two-ninths of the distance from point A to point B. We can use this information to find the coordinates of point B by counting two-ninths of the distance from point A to point B:

2/9 × √[(5 - 1.67)² + (2 - 4.67)²] ≈ 1.33

Starting from point A (1.67, 4.67), we can move 1.33 units in the direction of point B. We can find the coordinates of point B by adding this distance to the coordinates of point A:

x-coordinate of B: 1.67 + 2/9 × (3 - 1.67) ≈ 2.34

y-coordinate of B: 4.67 + 2/9 × (6 - 4.67) ≈ 5.19

Hence, the other possible endpoint for the fence, if the rancher started at point A and completed seven-ninths of the way to point B, is approximately (2.34, 5.19).

To know more about coordinates visit:

brainly.com/question/13662452

#SPJ1

Among the random variables you mentioned - z, t, chi-square, and F - the ones that have only nonnegative values are the chi-square and F distributions.

The chi-square (χ²) distribution is a special case of the gamma distribution, and it is used extensively in hypothesis testing and statistical modelling.

It is defined for nonnegative values, as it represents the sum of squared independent standard normal random variables.
The F-distribution, named after statistician Sir Ronald A. Fisher, is another continuous probability distribution that is defined only for nonnegative values. It is commonly used in the analysis of variance (ANOVA) to test the equality of multiple group means or in regression analysis to test the overall significance of a model.
In contrast, both the z (standard normal) and t (Student's t) distributions are defined for values across the entire real number line, including positive, negative, and zero values. The z-distribution is used for hypothesis testing and confidence intervals in situations where the population standard deviation is known, while the t-distribution is used when the population standard deviation is unknown and estimated from the sample data.

To learn more about chi-square, refer:-

https://brainly.com/question/14082240

#SPJ11

The missing number in those three card are 5 and 12 when the median is 4 and the range is 10.

Median refers the middle value of the given set of numbers.

Given,

I have three number cards. the median is 4.

Here we need to find the missing number when the range is 10.

Let us consider x and y be the missing number.

We know that, the range is difference of smallest and largest number,

So, we can write it as,

[tex]\sf x - y = 10[/tex]

Now, we know that the median is the middle value

Then it can be written as,

[tex]\sf y, 4, x[/tex]

The smallest possible values of y is 11, 12, and 13

Similarly, the possible values of x is 15, 16, 17

But based on the value of range we have only take the values, 5 and 12.

Because that one is satisfies the condition of range.

Therefore, the missing numbers are 5 and 12.

To know more about Median here.

brainly.com/question/28060453

The  solution to the system of differential equations with initial conditions x(0) = -33 and y(0) = 12 is:

x(t) = 15e^(11t), y(t) = -24e^(-2t)

To solve the system of differential equations {x' = 11x + 24y, y' = -3x - 6y}, we can use the method of matrix exponentials. First, we write the system in matrix form:

{{x'}, {y'}} = {{11, 24}, {-3, -6}} {{x}, {y}}

Next, we compute the matrix exponential of the coefficient matrix:

e^(tA) = {{e^(11t), 4e^(11t)}, {-3e^(-2t), e^(-2t)}}

Then, we can use this matrix exponential to find the solution to the system of differential equations:

{{x(t)}, {y(t)}} = e^(tA) {{x(0)}, {y(0)}}

Plugging in the initial conditions x(0) = -33 and y(0) = 12, we get:

{{x(t)}, {y(t)}} = {{-33e^(11t) + 4(12)e^(11t)}, {-3(12)e^(-2t) + 12e^(-2t)}}

Simplifying, we get:

x(t) = -33e^(11t) + 48e^(11t) = 15e^(11t)

y(t) = -36e^(-2t) + 12e^(-2t) = -24e^(-2t)

Therefore, the solution to the system of differential equations with initial conditions x(0) = -33 and y(0) = 12 is:

x(t) = 15e^(11t), y(t) = -24e^(-2t)

Visit to know more about Differential equation:-

brainly.com/question/28099315

#SPJ11

We can use the power series representation sum of the function f(x) = (1+x)^3 to find a closed-form expression for the series x[infinity] n=1 (-1)^n (2n+1)^3n.

Specifically, we have:

f(x) = (1+x)^3 = 1 + 3x + 3x^2 + x^3

Taking the cube of this expression gives:

f(x)^3 = (1 + 3x + 3x^2 + x^3)^3

Expanding this out using the binomial theorem gives:

f(x)^3 = 1 + 9x + 36x^2 + 84x^3 + 126x^4 + 126x^5 + 84x^6 + 36x^7 + 9x^8 + x^9

We can rewrite the terms with even powers of x as:

f(x)^3 = 1 + 9x + 36x^2 + 84x^3 + x^4 (126 + 126x + 84x^2 + 36x^3 + 9x^4)

Note that the expression in parentheses is just the power series representation of (1+x)^4. Therefore, we can simplify the above expression to:

f(x)^3 = 1 + 9x + 36x^2 + 84x^3 + x^4 (1+x)^4

Learn more about sum here: brainly.com/question/13013054

#SPJ11

Answer:The answer is B . 35 . Hope it helps

Step-by-step explanation:Mean: Addition of everything (314) / frequency (9)

It gives you 34.8… rounded to 35

In a single elimination tournament, a team plays until it loses. Therefore, for a tournament with 8 teams, 7 games must be played. The number of games in a single elimination tournament equals the number of teams minus 1.

The researcher should obtain a sample of at least 1709 households if she uses the prior estimate of 0.635, and a sample of at least 1843 households if she does not use any prior estimates, to estimate the proportion of households with broadband internet access with a maximum error of 0.03 and a 99% level of confidence.

(a) Using the formula for sample size calculation for proportion, we have:

n = (z² × p × q) / E²

where z is the z-score corresponding to the desired level of confidence, p is the estimated proportion, q = 1 - p, and E is the maximum error or margin of error.

Substituting the given values, we get:

n = (2.576² * 0.635 * 0.365) / 0.03²

n = 1708.89

Rounding up to the nearest integer, we need a sample size of at least 1709 households.

(b) If the researcher does not use any prior estimates, she can use a conservative estimate of 0.5 for p, which will result in a larger sample size.

n = (z² × p × q) / E²

n = (2.576² * 0.5 * 0.5) / 0.03²

n = 1843.27

Rounding up to the nearest integer, we need a sample size of at least 1843 households.

Therefore, the researcher should obtain a sample of at least 1709 households if she uses the prior estimate of 0.635, and a sample of at least 1843 households if she does not use any prior estimates, to estimate the proportion of households with broadband internet access with a maximum error of 0.03 and a 99% level of confidence.

Learn more about Confidence here

https://brainly.com/question/24131141

#SPJ4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a metal brush to simulate wear and tear from wind, rain, and other environmental factors. The shingle is then exposed to extreme temperatures and humidity levelsthat it may encounter during its lifetime, and the overall effect of these tests is used to estimate the shingle's durability over time.

The manufacturer uses statistical analysis to determine the expected failure rate of its shingles based on the results of the accelerated-life

The true percentage of Florida teenagers who value helping others in need lies between 76.1% and 81.9%.we can estimate with 95% confidence that the number of Florida teenagers who value helping others in need is between interval 1,596,900 and 1,722,900.

According to a survey of 800 Florida teenagers, 79% of them said that helping others in need will be very important to them as adults.

However, due to the limitations of a sample survey, this percentage might not be an exact representation of the entire population of Florida teenagers.

To estimate the true percentage of Florida teenagers who value helping others in need, a confidence interval can be used.

The margin of error given in the survey is +/- 2.9%, which means that we can be confident that the true percentage lies within a range of 2.9% above or below the sample percentage of 79%.

To calculate the confidence interval, we need to find the upper and lower bounds of the range. To find the lower bound, we subtract the margin of error from the sample percentage:

Lower bound = 79% - 2.9% = 76.1%

To find the upper bound, we add the margin of error to the sample percentage:

Upper bound = 79% + 2.9% = 81.9%

Therefore, we can say with 95% confidence that the true percentage of Florida teenagers who value helping others in need lies between 76.1% and 81.9%.

If we assume that the population of Florida teenagers is 2.1 million, we can also estimate the range of the number of teenagers who value helping others in need. To do this, we multiply the lower and upper bounds of the confidence interval by the population size:

Lower bound = 76.1% x 2.1 million = 1,596,900 teenagers

Upper bound = 81.9% x 2.1 million = 1,722,900 teenagers

Therefore, we can estimate with 95% confidence that the number of Florida teenagers who value helping others in need is between 1,596,900 and 1,722,900.

Learn more about interval:

https://brainly.com/question/10850002

#SPJ1

Factored 25x^2 - 36 as the product of (5x + 6) and (5x - 6). To factor completely 25x^2 - 36, we first note that both 25 and 36 are perfect squares. Specifically, 25 = 5^2 and 36 = 6^2.

Using the difference of squares identity, we can write:

25x^2 - 36 = (5x)^2 - 6^2

Now, we can use the difference of squares formula again to obtain:

25x^2 - 36 = (5x + 6)(5x - 6)

In general, when factoring a quadratic expression of the form ax^2 + bx + c, where a, b, and c are constants, it is helpful to look for common factors or perfect squares first. The difference of squares formula can also be a useful tool in factoring quadratic expressions.

To learn more  about quadratic expressions click here

brainly.com/question/12148335?

#SPJ11

The parametric equation for the ellipse with foci (0, −2), (8, −2), and vertex (9, −2) is ((x-9)^2/64) + (y+2)^2/36 = 1.

To find the equation for the ellipse with the given foci and vertex, we can use the standard form of the equation for an ellipse:

((x-h)^2/a^2) + ((y-k)^2/b^2) = 1,

where (h, k) is the center of the ellipse, a is the distance from the center to the vertex, and b is the distance from the center to the co-vertex. Since the foci are on the x-axis, the center of the ellipse is at (c, −2), where c is the distance from the center to a focus. Using the distance formula, we have:

c = √(8^2/4) = 4

The distance from the center to the vertex is a = 5, since the vertex is 5 units to the right of the center. The distance from the center to the co-vertex is b = 3, since the co-vertex is 3 units above or below the center. Substituting these values into the standard form of the equation, we get:

((x-9)^2/25) + (y+2)^2/9 = 1

Since the foci are on the x-axis, we have:

2c = 8, or c = 4

The distance from the center to the vertex is a = 5, so:

a^2 = 25

Using the relationship between a, b, and c for an ellipse, we have:

b^2 = a^2 - c^2 = 25 - 16 = 9

Substituting these values into the standard form of the equation, we get:

((x-9)^2/64) + (y+2)^2/36 = 1

Therefore, the equation for the ellipse with foci (0, −2), (8, −2), and vertex (9, −2) is ((x-9)^2/64) + (y+2)^2/36 = 1.

Learn more about parametric equation here:

brainly.com/question/15065327

#SPJ11

When we say that the sample correlation coefficient r is significant, it means that the correlation observed between two variables in a sample is unlikely to have occurred by chance.

This is often determined by comparing the value of r to a critical value calculated from a statistical test, such as a t-test or an F-test. The sample correlation coefficient r is a statistical measure that reflects the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables in a sample. It can range from -1 to +1, where -1 indicates a perfect negative correlation, 0 indicates no correlation, and +1 indicates a perfect positive correlation.

To determine whether the observed correlation is significant, we need to conduct a hypothesis test. The null hypothesis is that there is no correlation between the two variables in the population, and the alternative hypothesis is that there is a significant correlation. We then calculate a test statistic, such as a t-value or an F-value, which compares the observed correlation to the expected correlation under the null hypothesis. If the test statistic is larger than the critical value, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that the correlation is statistically significant.

In practice, the significance of a correlation coefficient depends on several factors, including the sample size, the magnitude of the correlation, and the level of statistical significance chosen for the test. It is important to keep in mind that a significant correlation does not necessarily imply causation and that other factors may be involved in the relationship between the two variables.

Learn more about hypothesis here: brainly.com/question/32066357

#SPJ11

c = 0.71, which means that the probability of obtaining a z-score greater than 0.71 in a standard normal distribution is 0.2445. We need to use a standard normal distribution table or calculator.

From the given information, we know that the area to the right of z (which is c in this case) is 0.2445. Looking up this value in a standard normal distribution table, we find that the z-score that corresponds to this area is approximately 0.71. Therefore, c = 0.71. We can also use a calculator to find the value of c. Using the inverse normal function (also known as the z-score function) on a calculator or spreadsheet, we can input the area to the right of c (0.2445) and get the corresponding z-score, which is 0.71.

Learn more about standard normal distribution here:

https://brainly.com/question/31379967

#SPJ11

(a) This can be seen by multiplying u1 by -5 and comparing it to u2: -5u1 = (5, -10, -20), which is equal to u2. (b) This can be seen by adding u1 and u2 together and comparing it to u3: u1 + u2 = (7, 4) and u3 = (-4, 7), which are equal. (c) This can be seen by multiplying p1 by 2 and comparing it to p2: 2p1 = 6 - 4x + 2x², which is equal to p2. (d) A and B are not scalar multiples of each other and are linearly independent.

(a) The two vectors u1 and u2 are linearly dependent because u2 is equal to -5 times u1. This can be seen by multiplying u1 by -5 and comparing it to u2: -5u1 = (5, -10, -20), which is equal to u2.
(b) The three vectors u1, u2, and u3 are linearly dependent because u3 is equal to the sum of u1 and u2. This can be seen by adding u1 and u2 together and comparing it to u3: u1 + u2 = (7, 4) and u3 = (-4, 7), which are equal.
(c) The two polynomials p1 and p2 are linearly dependent because p2 is equal to twice p1. This can be seen by multiplying p1 by 2 and comparing it to p2: 2p1 = 6 - 4x + 2x², which is equal to p2.
(d) The two matrices A and B are linearly independent because they have different determinants. The determinant of A is -15 and the determinant of B is 16, which are not equal. Therefore, A and B are not scalar multiples of each other and are linearly independent.

Learn more about vectors here:

https://brainly.com/question/14480157

#SPJ11

a) The number of positive integers between 50 and 100 that are divisible by 7 is 7 they are 56, 63, 70, 77, 84, 91, and 98

b) The number of positive integers between 50 and 100 that are divisible by 11 is 4 they are 55, 66, 77, and 88

c) The number of positive integers between 50 and 100 that are divisible by both 7 and 11 is 1 and that is 77

The term "divisible" to describe the relationship between two numbers, where one number can be divided exactly by another number without leaving a remainder this is know as Rule of divisibility. In this question, we are asked to find the positive integers between 50 and 100 that are divisible by 7, 11, and both 7 and 11.

To determine if a number is divisible by another number, we can use the following rule:

For any integers a and b, where b is not zero, a is divisible by b if and only if the remainder of a divided by b is zero. We can represent this using the modulo operation as a mod b = 0.

We are asked to find the positive integers between 50 and 100 that are divisible by 7, 11, and both 7 and 11.

a) To find the positive integers between 50 and 100 that are divisible by 7, we can list the multiples of 7 within the given range:

Multiples of 7: 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, 77, 84, 91, 98

From the list, we can see that there are 7 positive integers between 50 and 100 that are divisible by 7, which are 56, 63, 70, 77, 84, 91, and 98.

b) To find the positive integers between 50 and 100 that are divisible by 11, we can list the multiples of 11 within the given range:

Multiples of 11: 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77, 88, 99

From the list, we can see that there are 4 positive integers between 50 and 100 that are divisible by 11, which are 55, 66, 77, and 88.

c) To find the positive integers between 50 and 100 that are divisible by both 7 and 11, we need to find the common multiples of 7 and 11 within the given range:

Multiples of 7: 7, 14, 21, 28, 35, 42, 49, 56, 63, 70, 77, 84, 91, 98

Multiples of 11: 11, 22, 33, 44, 55, 66, 77, 88, 99

Common multiples: 77

From the list, we can see that there is only one positive integer between 50 and 100 that is divisible by both 7 and 11, which is 77.

To know more about Rule of divisibility here

https://brainly.com/question/28281492

#SPJ4

Complete Question:

How many positive integers between 50 and 100

a) are divisible by 7? which integers are these?

b) are divisible by 11? which integers are these?

c) are divisible by both 7 and 11? which integers are these?

The perimeter of the rectangle is 2b² + 16b - 36

The formula for calculating the perimeter of a given rectangle is expressed with the equation;

P = 2(l + w)

Such that the parameters of the formula are expressed as;

From the information given, we have that;

Length = b² + 3b- 18

Width = 5b

Now, substitute the values, we have;

Perimeter = 2( b² + 3b- 18 + 5b)

collect the like terms, we have;

Perimeter = 2(b² + 8b - 18)

expand the bracket, we have that;

Perimeter = 2b² + 16b - 36

Learn more about rectangle at: https://brainly.com/question/25292087

#SPJ1

The expression for the perimeter of the rectangle is 2b² + 16b - 36.

The expression for the area of the rectangle is 5b³ + 15b² - 90b.

A rectangle is a quadrilateral with opposite side equal to each other and opposite side parallel to each other.

Therefore, the length of the rectangle is b² + 3b - 18 and the width is represented by 5b.

Hence, the perimeter of the rectangle can be calculated as follows:

perimeter of a rectangle = 2(l + w)

perimeter of a rectangle = 2(b² + 3b - 18 + 5b)

perimeter of a rectangle = 2 (b² + 8b - 18)

perimeter of a rectangle = 2b² + 16b - 36

Let's find the area of the rectangle as follows:

area of the rectangle = lw

where

Therefore,

area of the rectangle =  (b² + 3b - 18) × 5b

area of the rectangle = 5b³ + 15b² - 90b

learn more on rectangle here: brainly.com/question/29153126

#SPJ1

The properties of the functions are

A sinusoidal function is represented as

f(x) = Acos(2π/B(x + C)) + D or

f(x) = Asin(2π/B(x + C)) + D

Where the properties are

Using the above as a guide, we have the following:

4) y = sin 2(x - π/2):

5) y = cos 1/2(x - π):

6) y = 3cos 2(x + π) - 1:

The graphs of the functions are added as attachments

Read more about sinusoidal function at

https://brainly.com/question/32061474

#SPJ1

If a = 4, then a 2 · a 3 is equivalent to all of the following except _ 4^2 · 4^3 = 1,024

Noted that Expression in maths is defined as the collection of numbers variables and functions by using signs like addition, subtraction, multiplication, and division.

We are given that a = 4, then the expression could be;

a^2 · a ^3

Substitute the values;

a^2 · a ^3  = 4^2 · 4^3

= 16 . 64

= 1,024

To know more about an expression follow;

brainly.com/question/19876186

#SPJ1

Answer:

x = 21.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Opposite angles of an inscribed quadrilateral are supplementary.

5x + 3x + 8 = 180

8x = 172

x = 21.5

The common ratio of a geometric sequence is the ratio of any term to the previous term. The general nth term is given by an = n1 * r^(n-1), and the 10th term is a10 = n1 * r^9. The sum of the first 16 terms is S = (n1 * (1 - r^16)) / (1 - r).

Without the first term n1, we cannot find the common ratio r. However, we can still find the general nth term and the sum of the first 16 terms of the sequence.

(a) The common ratio r of a geometric sequence is the ratio of any term to the previous term. Let's assume that the first term of the sequence is n1. Then, the second term is n1r, the third term is n1r^2, and so on. Therefore, the common ratio is r = (n2 / n1) = (n3 / n2) = (n4 / n3) = ...

(b) The general nth term of a geometric sequence is given by an = n1 * r^(n-1).

(c) To find the 10th term of the sequence, we use the formula above with n = 10. Therefore, a10 = n1 * r^(10-1) = n1 * r^9.

(d) To find the sum of the first 16 terms of the sequence, we use the formula for the sum of a geometric series: S = (n1 * (1 - r^n)) / (1 - r), where n is the number of terms. In this case, n = 16. Thus, the sum of the first 16 terms is S = (n1 * (1 - r^16)) / (1 - r).

To learn more about geometric sequence click here: brainly.com/question/13008517

#SPJ11

The statement is true. With a classic update using linear function approximation, we will always converge to some values, but they may not be optimal. This is because linear function approximation only allows for a limited representation of the value function, and the approximated function may not capture the true underlying structure of the problem.

Linear function approximation is commonly used in reinforcement learning to estimate the value function. The idea is to approximate the value function using a linear combination of features. During the learning process, the weights of the linear combination are updated using the classic update rule. While this approach is computationally efficient, it can result in suboptimal policies. The reason for this is that the approximated function may not be able to capture the complexity of the problem. This can lead to inaccuracies in the value function estimates, which in turn can result in suboptimal policies. To address this issue, more advanced function approximation methods, such as neural networks, can be used to approximate the value function. These methods can capture more complex relationships in the data and provide more accurate estimates of the value function.

To learn more about Linear function approximation : brainly.com/question/31584940

#SPJ11