Answer:
As a policy to reduce racial profiling during parades and frisks, it would create a system whereby the imputation of a certain ethnic minority (African-American, Latino, Asian, etc.) should be carried out with the presence of at least one witness and one member. police belonging to said minority, who can attest that the situation attributed to the person is real. Thus, for example, if a firearm or drugs is found in a routine search carried out on an African American, this situation must be corroborated by a witness and an African American policeman. This would create a framework of legitimacy for police action, since their procedures would not be classified as racial profiling, but would be much more transparent given the presence of people from the same ethnic group corroborating the criminal situation.
Please help I need this for a Law and Order class! will give brainliest for right answer!
(the time this question is referring to is when Hamilton and Madison created political parties.) If you can answer it then at least rephrase the question because I don't understand it.
What impact did the creation of political parties ultimately have on the press?
Answer:
It is often the case in revolutions that many who take a lead role in shaping the new society are not those who instigated a revolution in the first place. James Madison and Alexander Hamilton were both too young to be revolutionary instigators (they were just 14 and 10 respectively when the Stamp Act was passed) but by the 1780s they had risen to prominent positions within the new nation. Both would contribute to the Revolutionary War, Madison as a state assemblyman and Hamilton as a soldier, and both would earn selection to the 1787 Philadelphia convention. Each would play a lead role in determining the political make-up of the new nation: Madison as a political philosopher and architect of the Constitution; Hamilton as a forceful advocate for centralised political and economic power. Both were nationalists, envisaging the great potential for the future United States; both were at the forefront of the Federalist movement.
James Madison was physically an unremarkable figure, barely 158 centimetres tall, pale-skinned and sickly looking, with a high-pitched voice that was often inaudible in public meetings and assemblies. He was quite anti-social, disliking company and crowds, though those with whom he did mix described him as an erudite conversationalist. Madison had entered the Virginia assembly in 1776 and proved something of a junior Thomas Jefferson. His hard work and attention to detail earned him considerable respect, despite his young age. Like many of his colleagues, Madison was alarmed at the social disorder permitted by the watery Articles of Confederation, so he eagerly accepted a nomination to attend Philadelphia. There he tabled his famous ‘Virginia Plan’ for a three-branch federal political system, combining existing ideas (such as the British political system and the separation of powers theorised by Montesquieu) with his own innovations, guided by his keen knowledge of political philosophy and his precise attention to detail. Though his model was subsequently amended by the convention, Madison would later earn the epithet ‘father of the Constitution’, though it was a title he spurned. And while he opposed the inclusion of specific individual rights into the Constitution, when this concession was made to the anti-Federalists Madison alone drafted the Bill of Rights. Madison later went on to become the fourth president of the United States between 1809-17.
Explanation:
Why would a lawyer allow a paralegal to assist defending a client in a criminal trial? (Select all that apply.) To prepare drafts of documents for the lawyer to review. To deal with the client so the lawyer can focus on issues of law. To get help with research. To help prepare the case for trial.
Answer:
I think it's "To get help with research. To help prepare the case for trial."
Explanation:
Commercial law is what
Answer:
commercial law is a group of laws that govern financial aspects of business such as sales,investment securities, bank deposits, leases,what can be negotiated, secure transactions, credit, real estate,and mortgages
Explain the four types of bill
Answer:
A bill is the draft of a legislative proposal, which becomes a law after receiving the approval of both the houses of the Parliament and the assent of the President. There are four types of bills-ordinary bill, money bill, finance bill and constitutional amendment bills.
Which system has a central government and local units that implement the central government’s decisions?
A.
monarchical system
B.
unitary system
C.
federal system
D.
parliamentary system
Answer:
i think its c.................
How does the relationship between the federal government and state
governments differ from the relationship between state and local
governments?
A. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments can produce conflict between the two sides.
B. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments gives one type of government more power than the
other.
C. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments involves sharing some responsibilities.
D. The relationship between the federal government and state
governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution.
The relationship between the federal government and state governments differ from the relationship between state and local governments as D. The relationship between the federal government and state governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution.
What is government?It should be noted that government means the group of people who have been given the power to look after the affairs of a state.
In this case, the relationship between the federal government and state governments is specifically laid out in the Constitution.
Learn more about government on:
brainly.com/question/1078669
#SPJ1
Copyright protection is designed to protect the privacy of people who make artistic or creative works.
True
False
HELP
The chart below contains excerpts from several constitutional amendments.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied... on account of race.
15th Amendment (1870)
The right of citizens of the United states to vote shall not be denied... on account of sex.
- 19th Amendment (1920)
The right of citizens of the United States to vote (in federal elections) shall not be denied...by reason
of failure to pay poll tax or other tax.
- 24th Amendment (1964)
The right of citizens of the United States to vote, who are eighteen years of age or older, shall not
be denied... on account of age.
- 26th Amendment
What was the primary purpose of the four amendments on this chart?
O the protect individual liberties from government interference
O to meet the demands of different groups to be enfranchised
O to ensure the smooth running of the United States government
O to strengthen the national security of the United States

Answer: to meet the demands of different groups to be enfranchised
Explanation:
Even though the U.S. was founded to be a beacon of freedom, it ended up discriminating and disenfranchising certain groups of people such as black people and women.
As time went on however, some of these grievances were remedied by Constitutional Amendments which made it Unconstitutional and therefore illegal to disenfranchise these groups any longer. The above amendments are some of the aforementioned amendments that enfranchised these groups.
It can be hard for a business to win a commercial disparagement tort
because to prevail a business must be able to show
O A. that the company took all reasonable actions to counteract the
libel
O B. that the defendant used unfair competition that resulted in the
loss
O C. that their customer base cannot be recovered
O D. an accurate projection of how much money was lost as a result of
the slander or libel
Answer:
D.
Explanation:
The commercial disparagement is a type of 'tort' in which a person makes some derogatory statement against the business or a person causing them harm. It is also known as business disparagement.
Though it can be hard for the plaintiff to prove commercial disparagement yet certain parameters or prerequisites are laid in the law which can be shown as proof. One of the prerequisites is to show financial loss occurred due to the slander or libel. The plaintiff can show his/her financial losses occurred after the libel is traded in the market.
Therefore, option D is correct.
Under what circumstances, if any, should people be prohibited from voicing unpopular views?
Answer:
if they use violence or threats especially against a certain person as it can cause emotional stress.
I hope this helps!
Answer:
Voicing Unpopular opinions is apart of Everyone's constitutional Right, and isn't prohibited in any way but is limited.
Explanation:
Everyone has the right to voice their opinion, like who they Want to be President, or Samsung vs iPhone, whatever the matter is you have that right, but is limited, you are not allowed (Using your words) to cause a Public disturbance if their is no threat, like you can't call fire in a Movie theater if their is none, or you can't say "GUN" while the President is speaking or threaten some. It's just not allowed, these aren't considered an Opinion, their just disturbances.
In 2028, the Republican Party controls the U.S. Senate and
the Democratic Party controls the U.S. House of
Representatives. Each party hopes its candidate can win
the presidential election, giving the party more of a say in
the country's policies. It's a close race in the end, 51
percent of Americans vote for Republican candidate Ted
Torres. Former U.S. senator Rosa Marcus, the Democratic
candidate, receives 5 more electoral votes than Torres -
just enough for her to reach a total of 270 electoral votes.
According to the rules of the Electoral College, Marcus will win the election.
What adjustment to the Electoral College would change this outcome?
Answer:
A. All states splitting their electoral college votes between candidates based on what percentage of the Popular vote won.
Explanation:
Since Torres has the popular vote he would have the advantage to gain more electoral votes, but even with than, it doesn't guarantee a win in face:
Democratic Popular vote comes mainly from the State of California, and the NorthEast Section of the United States, the rest of the state follow alone, to give them more votes, although this is happening Marcus could still pickup several states, and electoral votes, even if Torres has more votes, not to mention safe states.
if a prepaid smart card or gift card is lost, then the money that was on that card is
Answer:
The money in the gift card will be lost aswell if you loose it
Which department or organization would you approach if your human rights have been violated?
Answer:
A Human Rights commission
Explanation:
Human rights commissions are commissions set up by the FCC or International Criminal Court. The ICC will make sure the boards are independent and non partisan. You should approach the ICC to appoint a Human Rights commission to you. You can also file a civil case with your local court.
Heyyo,
Answer:
The human rights commission.
Explanation:
The human rights commission is the organisation or department to approach if the human rights had been violated.
A human rights commission, also known as a human relations commission, is a body set up to investigate, promote or protect human rights.
Hope it helps :)
Have a great day!!
Describe TWO ways in which the above law protects citizens against human right violations
Answer:
they are part of UN and they are not oppresive
Explanation:
Under what circumstances, if any, should people be prohibited from voicing unpopular views? Explain your answer.
Answer:
In my opinion, people should not be prohibited from expressing their opinions under any circumstances, given the individual freedom of each individual to think independently, unless the ideas expressed were totally contrary to the common good (such as expressions that promote terrorism or defending regimes such as Nazism).
In other words, as long as the opinions of individuals do not promote violence or damage to society, they should be allowed, to guarantee the freedom of expression of citizens.
HELP
The chart below contains excerpts from several constitutional amendments.
The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied... on account of race.
15th Amendment (1870)
The right of citizens of the United states to vote shall not be denied... on account of sex.
- 19th Amendment (1920)
The right of citizens of the United States to vote (in federal elections) shall not be denied...by reason
of failure to pay poll tax or other tax.
- 24th Amendment (1964)
The right of citizens of the United States to vote, who are eighteen years of age or older, shall not
be denied... on account of age.
- 26th Amendment
What was the primary purpose of the four amendments on this chart?
O the protect individual liberties from government interference
O to meet the demands of different groups to be enfranchised
O to ensure the smooth running of the United States government
O to strengthen the national security of the United States

Answer: to meet the demands of different groups to be enfranchised
Explanation:
Even though the United States was founded to be a free country, this freedom was not a reality to a lot of groups such as Black people and women, both of whom found that they could not vote in the country they called home.
The 15th and 24th Amendments aimed to remove this disenfranchisement from Black Americans by constitutionally enforcing their rights to vote and for women, the 19th Amendment took care of that. The 26th Amendment was passed to end the disenfranchisement of people within the age group of 18 - 21 who were eligible for military service but were ineligible to vote.
What do the International Court of Justice and International Criminal Court NOT have access to?
A.
the ability to imprison people
B.
the ability to sentence criminals
C.
a police force to conduct arrests
D.
the legal backing of the international community
Answer:
c. a police force to conduct arrests
Growing up in a rough neighborhood, Xavier learned to hotwire cars in order to get them started. He and his friends would look for an unlocked car, hotwire it, and go for a joyride if they were bored. He gathered knowledge on many kinds of cars. If given the opportunity, Xavier could take almost any car on the street he wanted. Into what class of criminal would Xavier MOST likely fall?
professional thief
persistent thief
shoplifter
occasional offender
The kind of Criminal that Xavier is going to be classified as going by this narrative is a persistent thief.
Who is a persistent thief?
This is a person that is known to continue stealing people's properties even though they have been successful before.
Unlike the professional thief, they do not steal in order to get paid. They continue in crime even though they may have tried to stop.
Read more on thieves here: https://brainly.com/question/26019827
Which case is an example of violating an individual’s Fourth Amendment protections?
A police officer comes into your house when you are not home and searches your computer.
A law enforcement agency has a warrant to search your records on the email provider’s server.
You invite a police officer into your home to search and she asks for your email password.
A judge issues a warrant to search your work computer when you are not in the office.
Answer:
A police officer comes into your house when you are not home and searches your computer.
Explanation:
No warrant; no permission
debate on Democracy- For and Against. Points
Answer:
Instability of politics. Democracy has recently been chastised for failing to have sufficient political stability. Since governments are regularly elected and re-elected, democratic countries' domestic and foreign policies are subject to frequent change.
describe two ways in which a right to say no protect citizens
Answer:
No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.
Define Assault. Define battery Law Class help please.
Answer:
Assault and battery exists in both the tort law context and the criminal law context. ... In an act of physical violence, assault refers to the act which causes the victim to apprehend imminent physical harm, while battery refers to the actual act causing the physical harm.
Does this help?
Identify a crime news story and discuss ways in which the news media coverage impacted the public perception of the crime. Also discuss whether the media coverage had a positive impact on the case, or if the coverage had a negative impact on the case and how and why?
Answer:
sadly, i don't know
Explanation:
Answer:
Media reporting often highlights random and unexpected crimes. As a result, individuals can imagine themselves as potential victims of such events. Sensationalist media reporting contributes to moral panic (or outrage directed at certain groups such as youth or particular ethnic groups). i think this the answer.
is south African law codified???
Answer:
no
Explanation:
It is not recorded into one comprehensive piece of legislation.
Assault and Battery is a tort not a crime when the action involves people who know each other.
True or False
Answer: True
Explanation:
Generally speaking, assault and battery are torts not crimes. A tort is an action of wrongdoing against an individual or their personal property while a crime is an action against society as it involves an intentional breaking of the laws that society goes by.
For this reason, assault and battery are not treated as crimes but as torts because they involved action against a single person.
Why is war not illegal, or diplomacy venerated?
Answer:
Because War causes alot of damage in the country and many people will die from it
When an inmate is given a reprieve of their sentence, they are permitted to go home for a few days and relax
True or false
The case: Sixteen-year-old Terry was in a bedroom at his family's home with his younger brother when he pulled a handgun from underneath the mattress. Terry was allegedly pointing the gun at his brother when it fired. The bullet struck his brother, killing him. Terry had gotten the .380-caliber semi-automatic handgun by trading a 9mm Glock he had stolen from his father. The police say they believe the shooting was not intentional.
Answer: Involuntary Manslaughter
Explanation:
It is believed that Terry did not intentionally commit a crime. Intent would have resulted in a murder case. Murder, whether or not it is premeditated or unpremeditated, is intentional. The difference with manslaughter is that: voluntary manslaughter, while requiring intent, also involves a circumstance in which a reasonable person becomes emotionally disturbed and fueled by passion or impulse rather than judgement. Involuntary manslaughter is the unintentional killing that results from criminal negligence or recklessness. (no intent or heat of passion).
Elements of crime committed:
Actus Reus and the element of harm come into play with Terry's case. Because there wasn't causation for his brother's death, the intent element isn't present. Terry has no guilty state of mind.
The American Bar Association certifies or licenses the following professionals:
•Lawyers
•Legal secretaries
•Paralegals and legal assistants
•None. The ABA does not certify individuals.
Here's link[tex]^{}[/tex] to the answer:
bit.[tex]^{}[/tex]ly/3gVQKw3
11. What are the proper steps in processing a crime scene?
a. Isolate and secure the scene, search for evidence, submit evidence
b. Isolate and secure the scene, search for evidence, document the scene, collect and package evidence,
submit evidence to crime lab and maintain chain of custody
c. Isolate and secure scene, document scene, search for evidence, collect and package evidence, maintain
chain of custody and submit evidence to crime lab
d. None of the above