Answer:
Alexander was born in 356 B.C.E. in Pella, Macedonia, to King Philip II. As a young boy, Alexander was taught to read, write, and play the lyre. He developed a life-long love of reading and music. When Alexander was a teenager, his father hired Aristotle to be his private tutor.May 19, 2022
Explanation:
After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of communism in most regions, what became the
dominant economic system around the world?
Choose 1 answer:
A
Capitalism
B
Globalization
С
Socialism
D
Sovereignty
Answer:
A. Capitalism
Explanation:
After the collapse of the Soviet Union and the end of communism in most regions, the dominant economic system around the world became capitalism.
Very good explanation?
You should mark the person above Brainliest. That was very fast.
describe the characteristics of the false prophet in the old testament
A false prophet in the Bible is a person who propagates incorrect doctrine or false prophecy while claiming to speak for God.
A false prophet is a person who falsely claims to have the gift of prophecy, to be inspired by God, to speak on behalf of God, or to do so for wicked purposes. Even within the same faith as the "prophet" in question, it frequently happens that someone who is seen as a "true prophet" by some is also regarded as a "false prophet" by others.
In a broader sense, it refers to someone who positions themselves as a source of spirituality, a preacher, or a teacher while claiming to have a unique relationship to a deity.
Learn more about false prophet here:
https://brainly.com/question/2407951
#SPJ1
according to the narrator of the podcast, the deployment of the new pershing ii missiles during reagan’s first term was designed to both take out soviet defenses and
According to the narrator of the podcast, the deployment of the new pershing ii missiles during reagan’s first term was designed to both take out soviet defenses and arms race against the Soviet Union.
According to the narrator of the podcast, the deployment of the new Pershing II missiles during Reagan's first term was designed to serve two main purposes.
Firstly, these missiles were designed to take out Soviet defenses, particularly their ability to launch a nuclear strike against the United States. This was a crucial part of Reagan's strategy of ensuring that the US had the upper hand in the arms race against the Soviet Union.
Secondly, the deployment of the Pershing II missiles was also intended to generate a sense of deterrence among Soviet leaders, making them think twice before launching a nuclear attack on the US. This was achieved by demonstrating the US's superior military capabilities and willingness to use them if necessary.
Overall, the deployment of these missiles played a significant role in shaping US-Soviet relations during the Cold War and helped prevent a catastrophic nuclear war.
To know more about pershing ii missiles refer here: https://brainly.com/question/10543667#
#SPJ11
the aid of which european nation proved to be the most beneficial for the colonial cause
The colonial cause refers to the efforts of European powers to establish and expand their colonial empires in various parts of the world.
European nations such as Spain, Portugal, France, the Netherlands, and Britain were actively involved in this process.
These nations provided military, economic, and political support to their colonies to help them expand and maintain their control over the regions.
When it comes to determining which European nation provided the most beneficial aid to the colonial cause, it is difficult to point to one specific country.
Each nation had its own strengths and weaknesses, and their contributions varied depending on the region and the time period.
For example, Spain's aid was instrumental in establishing its vast empire in the Americas, while Portugal's aid was critical in building its colonial presence in Africa and Brazil.
France's support was beneficial in the colonization of North America and parts of Africa, while the Netherlands played a key role in establishing their colonies in Indonesia.
Know more about colonial cause here:
https://brainly.com/question/17971216
#SPJ11
what was not one of the problems confronting president carter as the 1980 election approached?responses
President Jimmy Carter faced several challenges as he approached the 1980 election, including a struggling economy, high inflation, and foreign policy crises in Iran and Afghanistan.
However, one of the problems that was not one of the challenges confronting President Carter as the 1980 election approached was a nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union. During his presidency, Carter had worked to reduce tensions with the Soviet Union and had signed the SALT II treaty, which limited the number of nuclear missiles each country could possess.
However, by the late 1970s, tensions had begun to rise again and Carter faced criticism from some for his handling of the issue. Nevertheless, the nuclear arms race was not a major issue in the 1980 presidential election, which was dominated by other concerns such as inflation and the economy.
Learn more about election visit: brainly.com/question/29628143
#SPJ4
Correct Question:
what was not one of the problems confronting president carter as the 1980 election approached?
the ideal late-nineteenth-century middle-class household was managed by the woman, not by the man. true or false
TRUE: In the late-nineteenth century, it was considered ideal for the woman of the household to manage and oversee the domestic duties and responsibilities.
This included tasks such as cooking, cleaning, and taking care of the children. Men were typically expected to work outside of the home to provide for the family financially.
However, it's important to note that not all households adhered strictly to these gender roles and expectations.
Know more about domestic duties here:
https://brainly.com/question/6397832
#SPJ11
Why was it difficult to EEUU negotiate a peace for North and South Vietnam?
The negotiations for peace between North and South Vietnam were challenging due to significant ideological and strategic differences, complex geopolitical dynamics, and deep-rooted historical grievances between the parties involved.
The negotiations for peace between the United States, North Vietnam, and South Vietnam during the Vietnam War were fraught with numerous challenges and complexities that made reaching a peaceful resolution difficult. Several factors contributed to the difficulty in negotiating a peace agreement.
Firstly, there were significant ideological differences between the parties involved. The United States supported South Vietnam, which was a non-communist regime, while North Vietnam was a communist-led government. The stark ideological divide made it challenging to find common ground and compromise.
Secondly, there were deep-rooted historical grievances between North and South Vietnam. The conflict had its roots in the division of Vietnam following the Geneva Accords in 1954, which led to a civil war between the two regions. The war had caused immense suffering and loss of life, fueling animosity and distrust between the parties.
Furthermore, the complex geopolitical dynamics of the Cold War added to the difficulty of negotiations. The United States saw Vietnam as a battleground in its broader effort to contain the spread of communism, while the Soviet Union and China provided support to North Vietnam. The involvement of external powers complicated the negotiations and made reaching a mutually acceptable agreement more challenging.
Additionally, the shifting military dynamics on the ground influenced the negotiating positions. The Tet Offensive in 1968, for example, changed the perception of the war and affected the bargaining power of the parties involved.
Overall, the combination of ideological differences, historical grievances, geopolitical complexities, and military dynamics made it exceedingly difficult for the United States to negotiate a peace agreement that satisfied all parties involved in the Vietnam War.
For more such question negotiations for peace
https://brainly.com/question/31870176
#SPJ11
What about the role of African-Americans
does Martin Luther King, Jr. seek to change?
Martin Luther King wanted to change the role and bring end to racial discrimination and segregation.
What was goal of Martin Luther King, Jr?He aimed to address systemic racism and inequality that African-Americans faced in society. He sought to dismantle segregation and racial discrimination as well as advocating for equal rights, justice and opportunities for African-Americans.
His vision was rooted in the belief that all individuals should be judged by the content of their character rather than the color of their skin. He played pivotal role in the movement, led nonviolent protests and delivered powerful speeches to inspire change.
Read more about Luther King
brainly.com/question/17746240
#SPJ1
What was public sentiment in the United States regarding U.S. involvement in Vietnam
Answer: Public sentiment in the United States regarding U.S. involvement in the Vietnam War was complex and evolved over time. In the early stages of the conflict, there was a general sense of support for the U.S. government's efforts to contain communism and prevent the spread of communism in Southeast Asia. This sentiment was fueled by the Cold War context and the belief in the "domino theory" that if one country fell to communism, others would follow.
However, as the war escalated and more American soldiers were deployed to Vietnam, public opinion began to shift. The media coverage of the war, including images of violence and civilian casualties, had a significant impact on public sentiment. The anti-war movement grew in size and strength, with protests and demonstrations taking place across the country.
By the late 1960s and early 1970s, opposition to the war had become widespread. People were disillusioned by the human and financial costs of the conflict, and many questioned the legitimacy and objectives of the U.S. involvement. The draft system also contributed to the discontent, as young men were being conscripted to fight in a war they did not support.
The anti-war sentiment reached its peak during this period, with massive protests and acts of civil disobedience, such as the Kent State shootings in 1970. As a result of this growing public opposition, President Richard Nixon announced a policy of "Vietnamization," aiming to gradually withdraw U.S. troops and shift more responsibility to the South Vietnamese forces.
Overall, public sentiment regarding U.S. involvement in Vietnam shifted from initial support to widespread opposition as the war dragged on, casualties increased, and the true cost of the conflict became apparent to the American public.
Explanation: :)
what are the two major initiatives of the world governments in terms of cargo security?
The two major initiatives of world governments in terms of cargo security are the Container Security Initiative (CSI) and the Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) program.
1. Container Security Initiative (CSI): Launched in 2002 by the U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP), CSI aims to enhance the security of global maritime containerized cargo. The program involves identifying high-risk cargo, pre-screening it at the port of origin, and using technology to ensure its security throughout the supply chain. This initiative has been adopted by several countries, promoting cooperation and information-sharing between customs administrations worldwide.
2. Authorized Economic Operator (AEO) program: This is a voluntary program established by the World Customs Organization (WCO) to promote secure and efficient global trade. Companies that meet specific security and compliance criteria are designated as AEOs, granting them access to various benefits, such as expedited customs clearance, reduced inspections, and priority treatment. This program encourages businesses to implement robust security measures and fosters a more secure and efficient international trade environment.
Learn more about cargo here : brainly.com/question/31080082
#SPJ11
Started by Mao Zedong, combined
collective farms into People's
Communes, failed because there was
no incentive to work harder, ended
after WWII.
The statement refers to the Great Leap Forward, a campaign launched by Mao Zedong in China in 1958.
The Great Leap Forward was aimed at rapidly industrializing and modernizing the Chinese economy, with a focus on collective farming and rural development. In order to boost agricultural output and encourage communal living, People's Communes—larger groups made up of several collective farms—were formed as part of the program.
However, the People's Communes were a particular area where the Great Leap Forward fell short of its goals. After being in effect for two years, the Great Leap Forward was finally discontinued in 1960.
Learn more about Great Leap Forward:
brainly.com/question/25407310
#SPJ1
which action did richard nixon take regarding the vietnam war following his election to the u.s. presidency in 1968?
After his election to the U.S. presidency in 1968, Richard Nixon took a number of actions regarding the Vietnam War. One of his most significant actions was the Vietnam peace agreement, which he signed with North Vietnamese leader Lê Đức Thọ in January 1973.
The peace agreement called for a ceasefire in the war and the withdrawal of U.S. troops from Vietnam over a period of time. It also provided for the release of prisoners of war and the normalization of relations between North and South Vietnam.
Nixon's decision to sign the peace agreement was a significant turning point in the war, and it marked the end of U.S. involvement in the conflict. However, the peace agreement was not fully implemented, and the conflict between North and South Vietnam continued for several years after Nixon left office.
Learn more about election visit: brainly.com/question/29628143
#SPJ4
what insight did the abolition moement gice many women about the struture of power and gender roles in society
Answer: women realized their own oppression
Explanation:
because they're freedom was limited and they too were seen as property. Like abolitionists, women were highly criticized for speaking out against institutions that were the norm in American society
the underwood tariff act and the sixteenth amendment reflected wilson's progressive goals by
The Underwood Tariff Act and the Sixteenth Amendment indeed reflected President Woodrow Wilson's progressive goals. Wilson was a staunch advocate of progressive reforms aimed at addressing economic inequality and increasing government intervention in economic affairs.
The Underwood Tariff Act of 1913 was a key piece of legislation that significantly reduced import tariffs and introduced a graduated income tax. Wilson believed that reducing tariffs would lower prices for consumers and promote fair competition among businesses. This was in line with his goal of breaking the monopolistic power of large corporations and creating a more level playing field for small businesses. Additionally, the introduction of a graduated income tax through the Sixteenth Amendment allowed for a more progressive tax system, where wealthier individuals paid a higher percentage of their income in taxes. This was a crucial step in Wilson's plan to redistribute wealth and ensure a more equitable society. Overall, the Underwood Tariff Act and the Sixteenth Amendment were instrumental in advancing Wilson's progressive agenda by promoting economic fairness, reducing inequality, and expanding the role of government in regulating economic activities.
Learn more about tariff here : brainly.com/question/22685610
#SPJ11
T/F The U.S. Congress approved a treaty annexing the Philippines in 1899.
Answer:
After the Spanish-American War the U.S. annexed the Philippines and they were happy to have America to replace Spain as a colonial partner. The Jones Act was an early 1900s statute that provided the Philippines more control over its government. The U.S. Congress approved a treaty annexing the Philippines in 1899.
Explanation:
during the negotiations to end british rule in india in the aftermath of the second world war, british actions were ultimately most strongly influenced by which of the following arguments?
British actions during the negotiations to end British rule in India were most strongly influenced by the argument that continued control over India was not economically feasible for Britain.
The defeat of the Axis powers required the Allies to grant political concessions in order mobilize colonial populations militarily and economically After World War II, Britain faced significant economic difficulties and could no longer afford to maintain its empire.
The event that sparked the conflagration was the assassination of the heir to the Austro-Hungarian Empire, Archduke Franz Ferdinand, in 191 In India, the struggle for independence was gaining momentum, and the British government realized that it could no longer justify its continued presence in India.
As a result, negotiations began between the British government and Indian leaders to determine the terms of India's independence. During these negotiations, British actions were most strongly influenced by the argument that continued control over India was not economically feasible for Britain.
The cost of maintaining the Indian colony was simply too high, and Britain needed to focus on rebuilding its economy and infrastructure at home.
Additionally, the Indian independence movement had gained significant international support, and the British government was under pressure to make concessions and negotiate a peaceful transition of power to Indian leaders.
Ultimately, this led to the establishment of India as an independent nation in 1947.
To know more about government click here
brainly.com/question/5567539
#SPJ11
Under the Articles of Confederation, individual states could ignore
agreements the Congress made with other countries. This meant that:
A. every state had to agree on a law before it was passed.
O B. the government did not have the ability to pay its debts.
O C. the central government was not always able to keep its
agreements.
OD. each state had the same number of representatives in the central
government.
Answer:
C. the central government was not always able to keep its agreements.
what did people do when the Black Death disease started killing people?
A.lock their doors
B.burned down houses and villages
C.they panicked
D.they tried to run and hide
E.all of the above.
Answer:
E. All of the above
Explanation:
People locked their doors and tried to hide in their houses. However, this did little good in cities where rats, and therefore fleas, were everywhere. They also burned down houses and even entire villages to try and stop the disease.
A. lock their doors.
people lock their doirs and quarantine. They may have panicked and tried to hide , but that is not the realistic answer.
do the provisions of the treaty fit president wuksionbs call for peace without victory explain your response
President Woodrow Wilson called for a peace without victory during World War I, hoping to avoid a harsh punishment of Germany and instead promote a peaceful resolution to the conflict. The Treaty of Versailles, which ended the war, included provisions that were arguably not in line with Wilson's call for peace.
For example, Germany was forced to pay reparations, give up territory, and limit their military capabilities, leading to economic hardship and resentment. Additionally, the treaty created the League of Nations, which aimed to prevent future wars but was not successful in doing so. Overall, while the treaty did bring an end to the war, its provisions were not entirely in line with Wilson's vision of a peaceful resolution without further punishment and conflict.
Learn more about treaty here : brainly.com/question/907952
#SPJ11
Which of the following was a lasting legacy of Ronald Reagan?a. His conservative judicial appointmentsb. The failed invasion of Cubac. His curtailment of defense spendingd. His expansion of federal welfare programs
(A) His conservative judicial appointments were a lasting legacy of Ronald Reagan.
During his time in office, Reagan appointed more than 350 federal judges, including three Supreme Court justices - Sandra Day O'Connor, Antonin Scalia, and Anthony Kennedy.
These conservative judges were known for their strict interpretation of the Constitution and their opposition to liberal policies such as affirmative action and abortion rights.
Many of these judges remain on the bench today and continue to shape American law.
While Reagan did attempt to curtail defense spending, this policy was not a lasting legacy as defense spending has increased significantly since his presidency.
Similarly, his expansion of federal welfare programs, such as the Earned Income Tax Credit, did have an impact but has not been a significant policy focus for subsequent administrations.
Finally, the failed invasion of Cuba, known as the Bay of Pigs, was a significant foreign policy failure but is not typically considered part of Reagan's legacy as it occurred before his presidency.
Know more about Ronald Reagan here:
https://brainly.com/question/4784629
#SPJ11
Read selections from the Declaration of Independence and the Articles of Confederation and briefly summarize them in your own words in the spaces that follow. This section is worth 5 points.
1. The Declaration of Independence:
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.—That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, —That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.1
Summary (2 points)
Answer:
The Declaration of Independence states that all people are created equal and have certain inherent rights, such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. It also asserts that governments exist to secure these rights and that people have the right to alter or abolish a government that fails to do so.
Explanation:
Answer:
Abstract:
A government that does not guarantee freedom, equality, happiness and respect for the rights of all citizens must be overthrown by the people, who must raise another government that guarantees all these elements given by God to men.
Explanation:
A summary should include the main ideas of the original text, but in a shorter and faster narrative, using a few words, but always highlighting the main theme of the original text.
Based on this, the summary above was made from the paragraph of the declaration of independence shown in the question above, where it reinforces the government's obligation to guarantee the security, freedom, equality and happiness of its people, and may be removed from power if that responsibility is neglected.
Since 1976, _____ have won the office of president most often.
a. senators
b. governors
c. representatives
d. businessmen
Since 1976, governors have won the office of president most often, indicating their higher likelihood of securing the presidency compared to senators, representatives, or businessmen.
Additional line 1: The success of governors in presidential elections suggests that voters value candidates with prior experience in executive positions and a track record of managing state affairs effectively.
Additional line 2: While governors have enjoyed electoral success since 1976, it is important to recognize that political landscapes and dynamics can change over time, and future presidential elections may witness different trends in terms of the backgrounds and professions of candidates.
To learn more about president click here :
brainly.com/question/497462
#SPJ11
How did Europeans justify settling on land hat belonged to indigenous people
Answer:
settling on lands owned by indigenous peoples would allow merchants and traders to more easily interact with those indigenous peoples and convert them to European religion
how did many northerners react to the passage of the fugitive slave act
Many northerners reacted with outrage and opposition to the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act.
This law, enacted as part of the Compromise of 1850, required the return of escaped slaves to their owners, even in free states. In the North, where abolitionist sentiments were growing, the act was seen as a betrayal of the principles of freedom and justice. It sparked widespread protests, resistance, and acts of civil disobedience.
The Fugitive Slave Act intensified the divide between the North and the South over the issue of slavery. In Northern states, where slavery was abolished or on its way to being abolished, people were appalled by the act's infringement on personal liberties and its forced participation in the institution of slavery. Many Northerners, including abolitionists and members of the Underground Railroad, actively assisted escaped slaves and obstructed the enforcement of the law. They organized protests, published anti-slavery literature, and provided legal aid to fugitives. The act further fueled anti-slavery sentiment and contributed to the escalation of tensions that ultimately led to the American Civil War.
To learn more about Slave act click here: brainly.com/question/28892357
#SPJ11
The characteristic common to the Latin American
policies of Presidents James Monroe, Theodore
Roosevelt, John Kennedy, and Ronald Reagan was
that they all
The common characteristic among these presidents' Latin American policies was the desire to safeguard American influence, protect American interests, and prevent the expansion of competing ideologies in the region.
The characteristic common to the Latin American policies of Presidents James Monroe, Theodore Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy, and Ronald Reagan was their emphasis on asserting and protecting American influence and interests in the region.James Monroe, with the Monroe Doctrine in 1823, declared that any intervention by European powers in the affairs of the newly independent Latin American nations would be seen as a threat to U.S. security. This established the United States as the dominant power in the Western Hemisphere.Theodore Roosevelt's policy of "Big Stick Diplomacy" in the early 20th century aimed to assert U.S. influence in Latin America, intervening militarily in countries like Panama and the Dominican Republic to protect American interests.John F. Kennedy's Alliance for Progress in the 1960s sought to promote economic development and democracy in Latin America as a means to counter the spread of communism, aligning U.S. interests with the region.Ronald Reagan's policies in the 1980s focused on combating the spread of communism in Latin America, particularly through support for anti-communist governments and military interventions.Overall, the common characteristic among these presidents' Latin American policies was the desire to safeguard American influence, protect American interests, and prevent the expansion of competing ideologies in the region.For more questions on Latin American
https://brainly.com/question/1486837
#SPJ8
young adults' revolt against authority and middle-class respectability in the 1960s was exemplified by
The young adults' revolt against authority and middle-class respectability in the 1960s was exemplified by counterculture movements such as the hippie movement.
During this time, many young adults rejected the traditional values of mainstream society, which they saw as oppressive and restrictive. The hippie movement, in particular, embraced alternative lifestyles and values such as nonconformity, freedom, and experimentation.
This movement rejected societal norms around clothing, music, drugs, and sexuality, and instead embraced a more relaxed and communal way of living. The hippie movement and other counterculture movements of the 1960s represented a significant challenge to the status quo and helped to pave the way for the social and cultural changes that followed.
------------The given question is incomplete, the complete question is:
"What was the exemplification of the young adults' rebellion against authority and middle-class respectability in the 1960s?"-------------
To know more about counterculture , click here.
https://brainly.com/question/7243272
#SPJ4
what do you think the message to this image is?
François Maréchal's cartoon depicts European sovereigns feasting on Congo as the main meal. This is related to the Berlin Conference.
What does the image mean?This is a reference to the Berlin Conference (also known as the Congo Conference). The cartoon has Leopold II prominently in the center, flanked by the Russian and German emperors. There is no signature, however Frédéric Paques has identified the author.
The Berlin Conference regulated Africa's split among fourteen European countries and the United States. Between 1885 and 1910, European countries competed for control of Africa's territories in the Scramble for Africa.
Learn more about Berlin Conference:
https://brainly.com/question/1913699
#SPJ1
how did television political campaign ads from the 1960s demonstrate how american politics and culture changed in that decade?
In the 1960s, television political campaign ads began to be used more frequently in American politics, demonstrating a shift in the way politicians interacted with the public.
The ads allowed candidates to reach a much larger audience than before, helping them to spread their message more widely. The ads during this era also reflected the changing culture of the time. They featured images of the American flag, military service, and patriotic music, which emphasized the idea of a unified nation and patriotism.
The ads also focused on the candidates' family life and their stances on social and cultural issues, such as civil rights and women's rights, which showed how American politics and culture had shifted towards a more progressive outlook. Additionally, the ads often featured celebrities, which was a new and powerful way to reach potential voters. Overall, the television political campaign ads of the 1960s demonstrated how American politics and culture had changed in that decade.
To know more about political campaign, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/30261022
#SPJ4
In what ways do you think COVID-19 has benefited society
It's important to note that these are just a few potential benefits of the pandemic, and the impact of COVID-19 has been overwhelmingly negative for many individuals and communities.
Some ways in which COVID-19 may have had positive impacts on society:
Technological Advancements: The pandemic has accelerated the development and implementation of remote communication technologies, such as video conferencing and telemedicine. These technologies have improved access to healthcare and education and have made it easier for people to work remotely.
Increased Awareness of Public Health: The pandemic has raised awareness of the importance of public health and the need for preparedness. This may lead to increased investment in public health infrastructure and research.
Learn more about COVID-19 visit: brainly.com/question/29475764
#SPJ4
Based on the two interpretations above regarding the Vietnam War, complete the following three tasks:
a. Briefly explain the main point made in Passage 1.
b. Briefly explain the main point made in Passage 2.
c. Provide ONE piece of evidence from the era of the Vietnam War that is not included in the passages, and explain how it supports the interpretation in either passage.
There are generally two interpretations of the Vietnam War: the traditionalist interpretation and the revisionist interpretation. The traditionalist interpretation sees the war as a necessary fight against communist expansion, while the revisionist interpretation argues that the war was a mistake and that the US should not have gotten involved.
Passage 1 likely aligns with the traditionalist interpretation of the Vietnam War. The main point made in Passage 1 is that the Vietnam War was necessary in order to stop the spread of communism. The passage argues that the US had a responsibility to fight against communism in Southeast Asia, and that if the US had not intervened, then the spread of communism could have led to a larger conflict.
Passage 2, on the other hand, likely aligns with the revisionist interpretation of the Vietnam War. The main point made in Passage 2 is that the war was a mistake and that the US should not have gotten involved. The passage argues that the war was costly in terms of both human lives and financial resources, and that it ultimately did not achieve its goals.
Now, to answer part c of your question, I will provide one piece of evidence from the era of the Vietnam War that supports the interpretation in Passage 2. One piece of evidence that is not included in the passages is the Pentagon Papers, a set of classified documents that were leaked to the press in 1971. The Pentagon Papers revealed that the US government had been lying to the public about the war and that the war was not winnable. This evidence supports the revisionist interpretation of the war, which argues that the war was a mistake and that the US should not have gotten involved. The release of the Pentagon Papers also helped to turn public opinion against the war.
Learn more about Vietnam War here:
https://brainly.com/question/31746600
#SPJ11