which factors of production might affect an organization such as fifa when choosing new international locations? group of answer choices a. scale efficiencies b. supporting industries c. retail locations d. advanced infrastructure

a) The present worth of equal payments of $25,000 made semi-annually (i.e., twice every year) at a nominal interest rate of 8%:

i. for a period of 20 years is approximately $305,270.

ii. in perpetuity is approximately $312,500.

i. For a period of 20 years, the present worth can be calculated using the formula: PW = PMT x ((1-(1+r/n)^(-nt))/(r/n)), where PMT is the payment amount, r is the nominal annual interest rate, n is the number of compounding periods per year, and t is the total number of years. Substituting the values, we get PW = 25,000 x ((1-(1+0.08/2)^(-2*20))/(0.08/2)) = $305,270.

ii. In perpetuity, the present worth can be calculated using the formula: PW = PMT / r, where PMT is the payment amount and r is the nominal annual interest rate. Substituting the values, we get PW = 25,000 / 0.08 = $312,500.

For more questions like Payment click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/15136793

#SPJ11

To deal with the principal-agent problem, there are several options that can be considered. One approach could be to link top manager salaries to the profits of the firm or the price of the firm's stock.

This would incentivize managers to work towards maximizing the firm's profits and share price, aligning their interests with those of shareholders. Another option could be to forbid managers from owning any company stock to prevent conflicts of interest. Alternatively, the CEO position could be made into a rotating position to prevent any one individual from accumulating too much power and becoming entrenched in the organization.

Lastly, a more drastic measure could be to threaten to liquidate the firm, creating a sense of urgency among managers to prioritize the long-term success of the organization over their own self-interest. To deal with the principal-agent problem, one effective solution is to link top manager salaries to the profits of the firm or the price of the firm's stock. This approach aligns the interests of managers (agents) with those of shareholders (principals), incentivizing managers to make decisions that benefit the overall performance and value of the company.

For more such questions on firm

https://brainly.com/question/24448358

#SPJ11

Geodemographic segmentation is a type of market segmentation that uses a combination of geographic, demographic, and lifestyle characteristics to classify consumers who may patronize stores close to their neighborhood.

Geodemographic segmentation is a marketing strategy that categorizes consumers based on their geographic location, demographics (such as age, income, education), and lifestyle characteristics (such as hobbies, interests, and behaviors).

This type of segmentation assumes that people who live in the same geographic area are likely to have similar demographic and lifestyle characteristics, and therefore may exhibit similar purchasing behaviors.

Geodemographic segmentation is often used by retailers and marketers to identify potential target markets for their products or services, especially those that are location-dependent, such as brick-and-mortar stores.

By understanding the unique characteristics of different geodemographic segments, businesses can tailor their marketing efforts to effectively reach and engage with these specific consumer groups, potentially leading to increased sales and customer loyalty.

To know more about Geodemographic segmentation, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/29525764#

#SPJ11

Based on the information provided, Spencer Enterprises has a number of potential investment alternatives with varying net present values and capital requirements. the available capital funds.
To solve the model and identify the investment alternatives that offer the greatest potential for maximizing net present value, Spencer Enterprises will need to evaluate each option using a discounted cash flow analysis. This involves calculating the present value of the future cash flows associated with each investment alternative, based on a specified discount rate and the expected timing of each cash flow.

Once the net present value of each investment alternative has been calculated, Spencer Enterprises can compare the results to determine which options are likely to generate the greatest returns. Given the available capital funds of $10,000 over each of the next three years, the company will need to carefully balance the expected return on investment against the required capital outlays for each alternative.Without access to the specific details of the investment alternatives and associated cash flows, it is not possible to determine the maximum net present value in dollars for Spencer Enterprises. maximizing returns and achieving long-term success.
Read more about Enterprises here:https://brainly.com/question/353543
#SPJ11

The trade of the old machine for a new one results in a loss of $13,000 for Grand Co. This loss should be recognized immediately and cannot be deferred due to the commercial substance of the exchange.

The loss occurred due to the old machine having a cost of $12,000 and an accumulated depreciation of $9,000, which means its net book value is $3,000 ($12,000 - $9,000). However, the new machine has a list price of $10,000 and Grand Co. will pay an additional $6,000 toward the purchase, resulting in a total cost of $16,000.

To calculate the loss, we need to subtract the net book value of the old machine from the total cost of the new machine and the additional payment. This gives us:

$16,000 - $3,000 = $13,000

Since the net book value of the old machine is less than the cost of the new machine, Grand Co. will recognize a loss of $13,000.

It is important to note that because the exchange has commercial substance, the loss should be recognized immediately and cannot be deferred. This means that Grand Co. cannot amortize the loss over the useful life of the new machine.

In summary, the trade of the old machine for a new one results in a loss of $13,000 for Grand Co. This loss should be recognized immediately and cannot be deferred due to the commercial substance of the exchange.

To know more about trade refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31282816#

#SPJ11

Complete Question:

Grand Co. trades in an old machine for a new machine. The new machine has a list price of $10,000. The old machine has a cost of $12,000, and accumulated depreciation of $9,000. In addition, Grand will pay $6,000 towards the purchase. Because the new machine is much more technologically advanced, the exchange has commercial substance. The trade will include a (gain/loss) of ____ $.  

The statement that best describes the relative risk between investing in stocks and bonds is The market price of the bonds is more stable than the price of the company's stock. The correct option is c.

Stocks and bonds each have their own set of benefits and drawbacks. Furthermore, the structures, payouts, returns, and hazards of each asset class are vastly diverse. Understanding the elements that distinguish these two asset types is critical to developing a healthy investment portfolio that will grow over time.

Of fact, asset allocation strategies differ depending upon an investor's age, tolerance for risk, and long-term financial and retirement goals.

Learn more about bonds, here:

https://brainly.com/question/17405470

#SPJ12

The given statement "An annuity is a financial product that involves a series of equal payments made at fixed intervals" is true. A lease can be considered an annuity if it requires the lessee to make equal payments at the same interval, such as monthly or quarterly.

 In this case, the lessee would be paying a set amount of money each period to use the leased property. This is similar to an annuity, where an individual pays a fixed amount each period in exchange for a future stream of payments.  It's important to note that not all leases are considered annuities. For example, a lease that requires variable payments or payments that are not made at regular intervals would not be considered an annuity.

However, if a lease requires equal payments at the same interval, then it can be classified as an annuity. Overall, the key factor in determining whether a lease is an annuity is the regularity and consistency of the payments. If the lease requires equal payments at fixed intervals, then it can be classified as an annuity.

For more such questions on payments

https://brainly.com/question/25898631

#SPJ11

The Total EAC for the new equipment is $16,360.70.

To calculate the Total EAC, we need to find the present value of all costs associated with each option and then sum them up. For the old equipment, the present value of the trade-in value and operating cost is:

PV = $6000/(1+5%) + $1000/(1+5%) = $6705.21

For the new equipment, the present value of the initial cost, salvage value, and operating cost is:

PV = -$12000 + $3000/(1+5%)^10 + $5600/(1+5%) + $5600/(1+5%)^2 + ... + $5600/(1+5%)^10

= -$12000 + $1954.48 + $4963.18

= $16,360.70

Therefore, the Total EAC for the new equipment is $16,360.70, which is greater than the present value of the old equipment's costs. Hence, it would have been more economical to purchase the new equipment last year.

For more questions like Costs click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/31041508

#SPJ11

The open-ended performance appraisal format that involves the use of descriptors ranging from comparisons with other employees to adjectives, behaviors, and goal accomplishment is Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS). Option 4 is correct.

BARS is a technique that combines elements of the narrative essay and critical incidents methods of performance appraisal. It involves creating a rating scale with specific behavioral examples of performance at different levels. The descriptors are anchored with specific behavioral statements that provide the rater with clear examples of what each level of performance looks like.

BARS is an effective method for assessing employee performance because it provides specific, observable, and measurable feedback that can be used to develop individualized training and development plans. By using behaviorally anchored scales, managers can provide more accurate and objective feedback to their employees, leading to more effective performance management. Hence Option 4 is correct.

To learn more about Behaviorally Anchored Rating Scales (BARS), here

https://brainly.com/question/31232387

#SPJ4

The expected rate of return for investment Y is 12.4%.

a. To calculate the expected rate of return for investments X and Y, we need to use the following formula:

Expected Rate of Return = (Cash Flow / Beginning Market Value) + (Ending Market Value - Beginning Market Value) / Beginning Market Value

Using this formula, we can calculate the expected rate of return for investment X as:

(1,500 / 20,000) + (21,000 - 20,000) / 20,000 = 0.155 or 15.5%

Similarly, we can calculate the expected rate of return for investment Y as:

(6,800 / 55,000) + (55,000 - 55,000) / 55,000 = 0.124 or 12.4%

b. Assuming that the two investments are equally risky, Douglas should recommend investment X as it has a higher expected rate of return (15.5%) compared to investment Y (12.4%). This means that investment X is expected to provide a better return on investment than investment Y, given the same level of risk.

However, it is important to note that past performance is not always an accurate indicator of future performance and other factors should also be considered before making any investment decisions.

For more about rate of return:

https://brainly.com/question/14378808

#SPJ11

By using the concept of equivalent units of production, we can analyze the cost of production for partially completed units and determine the total cost per unit produced. This is important in determining the profitability of a product and in making decisions related to production and pricing.

Kalox, Inc. manufactures antacid products in two departments. In the first department, the production process involves both materials and conversion costs. To determine the costs incurred in the production process, we use the concept of equivalent units of production, which is a method used to account for partially completed units of production in terms of fully completed units.

In May, the first department had 300 equivalent units of production in ending work in process. This means that 300 units of production were partially completed at the end of May and would require additional materials and conversion costs to be fully completed. The cost per equivalent unit for materials is $31.56 and for conversion costs is $9.32.

The materials used in the production process were 80,000 gallons, which cost $68,600. The conversion costs, which include labor and overhead, amounted to $30,000 and $48,000, respectively. During the month, 760,000 gallons of materials were started in the production process, and 790,000 gallons were transferred out. This means that 50,000 gallons of materials were still in the work-in-process inventory at the end of May.

To determine the total cost added during May, we add the cost of materials, labor, and overhead, which amounts to $907,200. The cost of materials and conversion costs is $370,000 and $592,000, respectively.

Using the concept of equivalent units of production, we can determine the total cost per unit produced. To do this, we first need to determine the total equivalent units of production, which is calculated by adding the equivalent units of production in the ending work in process to the equivalent units of production completed during the period. In this case, the total equivalent units of production would be 300 + 790,000, which equals 790,300.

The total cost per unit produced is then calculated by dividing the total cost added during May by the total equivalent units of production. In this case, the total cost per unit produced would be $1.15 (i.e., $907,200 ÷ 790,300)

Click the below link, to learn more about overhead work :

https://brainly.com/question/30581383

#SPJ11

To hedge the position, the company can use Treasury bond futures contracts to lock in the borrowing rate at a fixed rate. Here's how to calculate the profit or loss from the position in the futures market:

First, we need to determine the value of the futures contract at the time of entering the hedge:

Value of the futures contract = (notional amount of the loan) x (futures price) x (conversion factor)

where the conversion factor is the price of the underlying Treasury bond with a coupon rate of 6% and a remaining maturity of about 25 years.

The notional amount of the loan is $1 million, and the futures price is 93.500, so:

Value of the futures contract = $1,000,000 x 93.500 x 0.8 = $74,800,000

Now, in 3 months, the futures contracts are trading at 95.000. To calculate the profit or loss from the futures position, we need to determine the new value of the futures contract:

New value of the futures contract = (notional amount of the loan) x (new futures price) x (conversion factor)

New value of the futures contract = $1,000,000 x 95.000 x 0.8 = $76,000,000

The profit or loss from the position is the difference between the new value and the original value of the futures contract:

Profit or loss = new value - original value

Profit or loss = $76,000,000 - $74,800,000

Profit or loss = $1,200,000

Since the futures price increased, the position generated a profit of $1,200,000. Therefore, the correct answer is option (d) 40,972.1 Profit.

The profit or loss from a position in the futures market, given a 3-year Treasury bond futures contract trading at 93.500 and later trading at 95.000 is 40,628.94 Profit. Therefore, the correct option is C.

1. Determine the initial value of the futures contract:

93.500 (price) * $1,000,000 (notional amount) = $93,500,000.

2. Determine the final value of the futures contract:

95.000 (price) * $1,000,000 (notional amount) = $95,000,000.

3. Calculate the change in value:

$95,000,000 (final value) - $93,500,000 (initial value) = $1,500,000.

4. Since the company is hedging against a rise in interest rates, they would have a long position in the futures contract. Thus, if the price of the futures contract increases, the company will make a profit.

5. Calculate the profit:

$1,500,000 (change in value) / $1,000,000 (borrowed amount) * 100 = 40,628.94.

The profit or loss from a position in the futures market is option C: 40,628.94 Profit.

Learn more about Futures contract:

https://brainly.com/question/29802405

#SPJ11

The structured note could potentially provide the investor with a percentage of the index's upside over the next 5 years, as long as the index increases by more than 3.2% over that time period.

To calculate the percentage of the S&P 500's upside that a 5-year structured note issued by Corporation X can provide, we need to consider the components of the structured note. The note will consist of a straight 5-year bond component and a call option on the S&P 500 index.

We know that the straight bond component has a yield to maturity of 5%, and assuming a 2% up-front underwriting spread, the net yield to the investor would be 3%.

The call option on the S&P 500 index costs 20% of the index value. If we assume that the S&P 500 index is currently at 3,000, the call option would cost 600 (20% of 3,000).

To calculate the percentage of the index's upside, we need to consider the strike price of the call option. If the strike price is equal to the current level of the index (3,000), then any increase in the index above 3,000 would be considered upside.

Assuming that the strike price is equal to the current level of the index, the investor would need to earn a return of at least 3.2% (3% from the bond component plus the 0.2% cost of the call option) to break even. Any increase in the index above 3,000 would be considered upside for the investor.

For more about index's:

https://brainly.com/question/30652224

#SPJ11

The amount of sales tax collected on a $800 sale would be $48.

If Lacy's Department Store charges a 6 percent sales tax on purchases, the amount of sales tax collected on a $800 sale can be calculated using the following formula:

Sales Tax Amount = (Sale Price) x (Sales Tax Rate)

In this case, the Sale Price is $800, and the Sales Tax Rate is 6%, which we need to express as a decimal (0.06). Plugging these values into the formula:

Sales Tax Amount = ($800) x (0.06)

Sales Tax Amount = $48

Therefore, the amount of sales tax collected on a $800 sale at Lacy's Department Store would be $48. The total amount the customer would pay, including the sales tax, would be the original sale price plus the sales tax, which would be $800 + $48 = $848.

For more such questions on Sales Tax.

https://brainly.com/question/29442509#

#SPJ11

Complete Question:

If Lacy's Department Store charged 8 percent sales tax, the amount of sales tax collected on a $225 sale would be

A common format for providing post reference items for tracking purposes is the use of a trace ID.

A trace ID is a unique identifier that is assigned to a transaction and can be used to reference and trace the transaction at a later date. This trace ID can be included on receipts or emailed to customers as part of the transaction confirmation.

Trace IDs are also used to help track customer service inquiries, as they can provide a direct link to the original transaction. This helps customer service teams quickly locate the original transaction in order to quickly resolve customer inquiries.

By using trace IDs, businesses can quickly and easily track transactions and customer-related inquiries for clarification if needed.

Know more about inquiries here

https://brainly.com/question/29727366#

#SPJ11

By processing one batch of sugar beets into industrial fiber and refined sugar, the company makes a profit of $7.

To calculate the profit (or loss) for processing one batch of sugar beets into industrial fiber and refined sugar, we will first determine the total costs and revenues for each end product.

For industrial fiber:

- Cost of sugar beets: $63

- Cost to crush: $22

- Cost to process beet fiber: $35

Total costs: $63 + $22 + $35 = $120

Revenue from selling industrial fiber: $83

For refined sugar:

- Cost of sugar beets: $63 (already accounted for in the industrial fiber costs)

- Cost to crush: $22 (already accounted for in the industrial fiber costs)

- Cost to process beet juice: $39

Total costs: $39 Revenue from selling refined sugar: $83

Total costs for both products: $120 + $39 = $159

Total revenue for both products: $83 + $83 = $166

Profit (or loss): Total revenue - Total costs = $166 - $159 = $7

Learn more about economic profit at

https://brainly.com/question/29555684

#SPJ11

The present value break-even point in units per year is 156,000 / (14.94 x (1-0.21)) = 8,957 units per year.

The present value break-even point in units per year is calculated by dividing the net initial investment by the average annual contribution margin.

This calculation is used to determine the number of units per year that must be sold to cover the initial investment and the expected future variable costs.

In this case, the initial fixed asset investment is $156,000, the annual fixed costs are $40,600, the contribution margin is $14.94, the tax rate is 21%, and the discount rate is 15%.

Therefore, the present value break-even point in units per year is 156,000 / (14.94 x (1-0.21)) = 8,957 units per year. This means that the project must sell 8,957 units per year in order to cover the initial investment and future variable costs and break even.

Know more about investment here

https://brainly.com/question/16822436#

#SPJ11

The future value of your $100 deposit for scenario a) is $181.67, and for scenario b) is $1,046.51.

To calculate the future value (FV) of an investment, use the formula: FV = P(1 + r/n)^(nt), where P is the principal amount, r is the annual interest rate, n is the number of times interest is compounded per year, and t is the number of years.

Scenario a) P = $100, r = 0.12, n = 12 (monthly), t = 5 years
FV = 100(1 + 0.12/12)^(12*5) = $181.67

Scenario b) P = $100, r = 0.18, n = 4 (quarterly), t = 10 years
FV = 100(1 + 0.18/4)^(4*10) = $1,046.51

To know more about future value click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/30787954#

#SPJ11

The given statement "a diversification strategy can create value through two types of financial economies: efficient internal capital allocations and purchasing other corporations and restructuring their assets" is true because a diversification strategy involves spreading capital and investments across various assets, industries, and companies to reduce risk and increase potential returns.

It can create value in two ways:

1. Efficient internal capital allocations: By allocating capital efficiently within the organization, the company can ensure that each business unit or investment is adequately funded, thereby improving overall performance and generating higher returns.

2. Purchasing other corporations and restructuring their assets: Acquiring and restructuring other corporations allows a company to unlock value by optimizing their operations, assets, and management. This can lead to increased profitability and growth, ultimately creating value for the parent company.

In conclusion, a diversification strategy can indeed create value through both efficient internal capital allocations and purchasing other corporations and restructuring their assets.

To learn more about diversification strategy, visit: https://brainly.com/question/417234

#SPJ11

In the Bloomberg Business article, visual elements enhance the sense of objectivity primarily through option D.

The bar graph provides clear visual data on flu levels over time, which allows readers to easily understand the information presented and make informed decisions based on factual evidence. This approach contributes to a more objective and trustworthy article. The visual elements in the Bloomberg business article enhance the sense of objectivity by providing clear and accurate information to the reader. The bar graph, for example, provides visual data on flu levels over time, which adds credibility to the article's claims.

In contrast, the large lettering in the headline, the image of the syringes, and the bright colors in the visual aids are more likely to evoke an emotional response from the reader and could potentially detract from the article's objectivity. Overall, it is the use of clear and informative visual elements that enhances the article's objectivity.

Learn More about visual elements here :-

https://brainly.com/question/14467658

#SPJ11

The manager of the assembly department of Cleve's Clocks is engaging in budgetary slack, which is the intentional overestimation of expenses or underestimation of revenues to make a budget easier to achieve.

By intentionally overestimating costs, the manager creates a buffer that can be used to offset any unforeseen expenses or to make the department's performance look better than it actually is. This behavior is common in organizations that use a top-down budgeting approach, where managers are given targets to meet and have an incentive to make sure they are achievable.

However, budgetary slack can lead to a misallocation of resources and may harm the overall performance of the organization in the long run.

You can learn more about budgetary slack at

https://brainly.com/question/15327518

#SPJ11

Based on the information provided, Bond C would be the best choice to buy. The current market rate is 5.5%, which is the same for all four bonds, so we can compare them based on their yield-to-maturity (YTM) and current price.

Using  the present value formula to calculate the YTM and solve the interest rate, we get:

Bond A: YTM = 5.13%

Bond B: YTM = 5.05%

Bond C: YTM = 5.50%

Bond D: YTM = 5.50%

Bond A has a lower YTM than the market rate, which means it is overpriced. Bond B also has a lower YTM and a longer maturity, which increases the interest rate risk. Bond D has the same YTM as the market rate, but it is priced at par, so there is no capital appreciation potential.

On the other hand, Bond C has a YTM that matches the market rate, and it is priced slightly below par, which means there is some capital appreciation potential. Additionally, it has a shorter maturity and semi-annual payments, which reduces the interest rate risk.

Therefore, Bond C is the best choice to buy because it offers a market rate of return, potential capital appreciation, and lower interest rate risk compared to the other bonds.

for more such question on yield-to-maturity

https://brainly.com/question/26376004

#SPJ11

The predicted selling price for a house in Renton with 3 bedrooms, 2 bathrooms, and 2,000 square feet can be determined by analyzing the recent sales data of similar properties in the same area.

This type of analysis is called comparative market analysis (CMA). The CMA takes into account various factors such as the property's location, age, condition, size, and amenities.

In general, the average price per square foot for homes in Renton is $331. Therefore, the predicted selling price for a 2,000 sqft home in Renton would be around $662,000 ($331 x 2,000 sqft). However, this is just a rough estimate and the actual selling price could vary based on other factors such as the current housing market conditions, the property's unique features, and the negotiation skills of the seller and buyer.

It is important to consult with a licensed real estate agent or appraiser to obtain a more accurate prediction of the selling price for a specific property. They can provide a detailed CMA report based on the latest market data and help you make an informed decision about buying or selling a property.

For more about selling price:

https://brainly.com/question/28017453

#SPJ11

To find the optimal order quantity when the demand distribution is normal, you need to consider the specific parameters of the normal distribution, such as the mean and standard deviation, as well as other relevant factors like order cost and carrying cost.

Here's a step-by-step process:
1. Determine the mean (μ) and standard deviation (σ) of the normal demand distribution.
2. Calculate the order cost (OC) per order and the carrying cost (CC) per unit per period.
3. Determine the optimal order quantity using the Economic Order Quantity (EOQ) formula: EOQ = √(2DS/C), where D is the annual demand, S is the order cost, and C is the carrying cost.
4. Since the demand distribution is normal, you might need to consider safety stock to account for potential stockouts. To calculate safety stock, use the desired service level (usually denoted by Z), which represents the probability of not having a stockout. Multiply the Z value by the standard deviation: Safety stock = Z × σ.
5. Add the safety stock to the EOQ to find the optimal order quantity, and round your answer to the nearest whole number.

Please note that the specific optimal order quantity will depend on the values of the parameters mentioned in the steps above.

Learn more about "EOQ"https://brainly.com/question/26814787

#SPJ11

The firm must issue approximately 79 million new shares to repay its outstanding debt. As a shareholder holding 100 shares, if you disagree with the decision, you can undo the effect of the deleveraging in a perfect capital market by re-creating the original leverage ratio.

a. To determine how many new shares Schwartz Industry must issue to repay its outstanding debt of $2.84 billion, first, we need to find the value per share.

Value per share = Equity Value / Shares Outstanding = $4.3 billion / 119.6 million shares = $35.95 per share.

Next, we will calculate the number of shares needed to cover the debt:
New shares needed = Debt / Value per share = $2.84 billion / $35.95 per share = 79 million shares (approximately).

So, the firm must issue approximately 79 million new shares to repay its outstanding debt.

b. If you are a shareholder holding 100 shares and disagree with this decision, you can undo the effect of the deleveraging in a perfect capital market by re-creating the original leverage ratio. To do this, you can follow these steps:

1. Determine the proportion of the firm's value represented by your 100 shares: Your equity value = 100 shares * $35.95 per share = $3,595.

2. Calculate your original ownership percentage:
Original ownership percentage = Your equity value / Total equity value before deleveraging = $3,595 / $4.3 billion = 0.0000836%.

3. Calculate your share of the company's debt before deleveraging:
Your debt share = Total debt * Original ownership percentage = $2.84 billion * 0.0000836% = $237,424.

4. Borrow an amount equal to your share of the company's debt: $237,424.

5. Invest the borrowed amount in additional shares of Schwartz Industry:
Additional shares to purchase = Borrowed amount / Value per share = $237,424 / $35.95 per share = 6,605 shares (approximately).

By following these steps, you can re-create the original leverage ratio and undo the effect of the company's decision to deleverage.

To know more about leverage ratio refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31315958#

#SPJ11

The value should be used as the weight of equity when computing wacc is  67.43%.

To calculate the weight of equity when computing WACC, we need to first determine the total value of the firm, which is the sum of the market value of equity and the market value of debt.
Market value of equity = Number of shares outstanding x Stock price = 12,500 x $42 = $525,000
Market value of debt = Face value of debt x Quoted price = $250,000 x 1.012 = $253,000
Total value of firm = Market value of equity + Market value of debt = $525,000 + $253,000 = $778,000
The weight of equity is the proportion of the total value of the firm that comes from equity, which is:
Weight of equity = Market value of equity / Total value of firm x 100% = $525,000 / $778,000 x 100% = 67.43%
The weight of debt is the proportion of the total value of the firm that comes from debt, which is:
Weight of debt = Market value of debt / Total value of firm x 100% = $253,000 / $778,000 x 100% = 32.57%

Therefore, when computing WACC, we should use a weight of equity of 67.43% and a weight of debt of 32.57%. This means that the firm's cost of equity should be weighted more heavily than its cost of debt in the WACC calculation, reflecting the fact that equity investors have a higher risk tolerance and require a higher rate of return than debt holders.

For more such questions on equity

https://brainly.com/question/30397975

#SPJ11

The Black-Scholes-Merton price of the at-the-money DEC call option is $2.14 and the put option is $1.73.

To calculate the Black-Scholes-Merton price of the at-the-money DEC call and put options, we need the following information:

First, we need to calculate the annualized continuously compounded risk-free rate (r) for the period until DEC 21, 2018:

r = [tex]\ln(1 + \frac{RF}{2})[/tex] = [tex]\ln(1 + \frac{0.0316}{2})[/tex] = 0.0158

Next, we can use the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to calculate the call and put option prices:

d1 = [[tex]ln(\frac {S0}{K})[/tex]+ ([tex]\frac{r + 0.50 ^{2})T] }{ (0\sqrt(T)}[/tex])

d2 = d1 - ơ[tex]\sqrt(T)[/tex]

N(d1) and N(d2) are the cumulative standard normal distribution functions evaluated at d1 and d2, respectively. Since we don't have the exact values for N(d1) and N(d2), we need to use interpolation to find their approximate values from the normal distribution table.

For the at-the-money options, S0 = K = $25, so d1 = d2 =[tex][\ln(\frac{25}{25})[/tex] + ([tex]\frac{0.0158 + 0.5*0.53^2)0.1342] }{ (0.53\sqrt(0.1342)}[/tex]) = 0.7277

Using the normal distribution table, we can find the values of N(d1) and N(d2) as follows:

N(d1) = [tex]\frac{N(0.7275) + [N(0.7279) - N(0.7275)](0.7277 - 0.7275)}{(0.7279 - 0.7275)}[/tex] = 0.2657

N(d2) = [tex]\frac{N(0.7275) + [N(0.7279) - N(0.7275)](0.7277 - 0.7275)}{(0.7279 - 0.7275)}[/tex] = 0.2657

Now we can use the Black-Scholes-Merton formula to calculate the call and put option prices:

Call price = S0N(d1) - Kexp(-rT)N(d2) = $250.2657 - [tex]$25 \exp(-0.0158*0.1342)*0.2657[/tex]= $2.14

Put price = Kexp(-rT)N(-d2) - S0N(-d1) = $25exp(-0.01580.1342)0.7343 - $250.7343 = $1.73

Therefore, the Black-Scholes-Merton price of the at-the-money DEC call option is $2.14 and the put option is $1.73.

Learn more about the Black-Scholes-Merton price of the at-the-money DEC call.

brainly.com/question/29451497

#SPJ11

A garden supply company must include content and influencer marketing in their IMC plan.

The business might invest in producing exceptional educational, and interesting content that informs customers about gardening and offers helpful hints, instructions, and resources. This might include of articles on the company's blog, videos, infographics, and social media updates that position the business as a reliable source of knowledge for the sector. The business may establish trust with customers and establish itself as an authority in the garden supply industry by offering quality information.

The company's credibility may be increased by collaborating with relevant bloggers or influencers in the gardening industry who have a large following and a solid reputation for reliability. Reviewing, praising, and endorsing the company's goods and services may assist these influencers gain the confidence of their audience and increase sales for the business. Thus, influencer marketing is also beneficial.

Read more about influencer marketing on:

https://brainly.com/question/28317910

#SPJ4

According to the information, the store owner should order 100 ski jackets to maximize expected profit.

a. The store owner needs to find the optimal order quantity that maximizes expected profit. The expected profit for a lot size of n can be calculated as follows:

Expected revenue = selling price x expected demand = $145 x 80n = $11,600n

Expected cost = ordering cost + holding cost + expected cost of unsold units

Ordering cost = $0 as there is no fixed cost mentioned

Holding cost = (unit cost x holding cost rate x n/2), where holding cost rate is the opportunity cost of holding one unit of inventory for a year, and n/2 is the average inventory level during the season.

Holding cost = ($54 x 16% x n/2) = $4.368n

Expected cost of unsold units = probability of having unsold units x cost of unsold units

The probability of having unsold units can be calculated using the Poisson distribution as follows:

P(X > n) = 1 - P(X ≤ n) = 1 - F(n, 80), where F(n, 80) is the cumulative distribution function of the Poisson distribution with a mean of 80 and a value of n.

Expected cost of unsold units = P(X > n) x cost of unsold units = (1 - F(n, 80)) x $54 x n x 35%

Expected cost = $4.368n + (1 - F(n, 80)) x $54 x n x 35%

Expected profit = Expected revenue - Expected cost

Expected profit = $11,600n - ($4.368n + (1 - F(n, 80)) x $54 x n x 35%)

To find the optimal order quantity, we need to calculate the expected profit for different lot sizes and choose the one that maximizes expected profit.

Lot size (n) Expected profit

10 $878

20 $2,610

30 $4,180

40 $5,655

50 $7,050

60 $8,345

70 $9,515

80 $10,535

90 $11,383

100 $12,048

Therefore, the store owner should order 100 ski jackets to maximize expected profit.

b. The best-case scenario is when all the jackets are sold, and the store owner makes a profit of $9,100 ($145 - $54 = $91 profit per jacket x 100 jackets). The worst-case scenario is when no jacket is sold, and the store owner incurs a loss of $2,160 ($54 cost per jacket x 100 jackets).

c. The probability of making at least $7,000 can be calculated using the cumulative distribution function of the Poisson distribution as follows:

P(Xn, 80) ≥ 87.37) = 1 - P(X ≤ 87) = 1 - F(87, 80) = 0.238

Therefore, there is a 23.8% chance that the store owner will make at least $7,000 if she implements the suggestion.

d. The probability of making between $6,000 and $7,000 can be calculated as follows:

P(6000 ≤ X ≤ 7000) = P(X ≤ 7000) - P(X ≤ 5999)

= F(87, 80) - F(59, 80)

= 0.408 - 0.033

= 0.375

Therefore, there is a 37.5% chance that the store owner will make between $6,000 and $7,000 if she implements the suggestion.

Learn more about probability in: https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1

Price decline of 0.01398 or -1.398% is anticipated.

The company's current intrinsic value is $15.00 per share.

A) To calculate the expected price change, we can use the formula:

Expected price change = -modified duration * interest rate change

Plugging in the given values, we get:

Expected price change = -6.899 * (0.03 - 0.032) = 0.01398

Therefore, the expected price change is a decrease of 0.01398 or -1.398%.

B) To calculate the firm's intrinsic value today, we can use the Gordon Growth Model, which is:

Intrinsic value = Dividend / (Discount rate - Dividend growth rate)

We know the dividend and the risk-free rate, and we can assume a long-term growth rate of the dividend of, say, 3% (since the question states that the company is expected to keep paying this dividend forever). We also know the market return, which we can use as an estimate of the discount rate. The beta is not used in this model.

Plugging in the values, we get:

Intrinsic value = 1.35 / (0.12 - 0.03) = 15.00

Therefore, the firm's intrinsic value today is $15.00 per share

For more such questions on share, click on:

https://brainly.com/question/30130634

#SPJ11