Answer:
please help help me me my question solve
Punishment was non-proportional and harsher for racial minorities than for others of the following aspects of Ferguson were in line with the racial animus model. Thus, option (c) is correct.
What is racial animus model?The term racial animus model refers to the public support for punitive sentencing of criminal offenders is shaped by threat perceptions associated with cultural minority groups. The punitive sentencing of criminal offenders in the United States and Australia.
According to the racial animus model, was the based on the situation to the past period of the time the America has developed was the main focuses on the mental image of the typical offender on young, inner-city, black male who offends with little remorse. The racial animus model was non-proportional and harsher for racial minorities.
As a result, the Ferguson were consistent with the racial animus model: punishment was disproportional and worse for racial minorities than for others. Therefore, option (c) is correct.
Learn more about on racial animus model, here:
https://brainly.com/question/9391909
#SPJ2
Brainliest
Using the internet, research “The Freedom to Peacefully Assemble.” Write an explanation of how the interpretation of this right has changed over time.
Answer:
Explanation:
The First Amendment protects the freedom to peacefully assemble or gather together or associate with a group of people for social, economic, political or religious purposes. It also protects the right to protest the government.
The right to petition can mean signing a petition or even filing a lawsuit against the government.
NAACP v. Alabama (1958): When Alabama Circuit Court ordered the NAACP to stop doing business in the state and subpoenaed the NAACP for records including their membership list, the NAACP brought the matter to the Supreme Court. The Court ruled in favor of the NAACP, which Justice John Marshall Harlan II writing: “This Court has recognized the vital relationship between freedom to associate and privacy in one's associations.”