Which of the following describes a situation in which there would be
decreasing marginal utility?

A. Buying food in bulk to save money in the long run.
B. Buying normal goods as substitutes for inferior goods,
C. Buying luxury items that you cannot afford.
D. Buying a new car when you already have two cars.​

Complete Question:

Casey is on trial under criminal allegations that she engaged in fraudulent behavior at the company she manages. She is worried when

the plaintiff alleges that it has "unambiguous proof that Casey is guilty. Which of the following is most likely true?

1. The plaintiff will most likely prove Casey is guilty, since criminal charges only need to meet a prima facie burden of proof.

2. Casey need not worry about the plaintiff's evidence, since parties tend to boast about the level of proof they can establish anyway.

3. If the plaintiff does have unambiguous evidence that meets a "clear and convincing" burden of proof, Casey will most likely be found guilty.

4. If the plaintiff provides proof only up to the level of "clear and convincing," Casey can still be acquitted.

Answer:

3. If the plaintiff does have unambiguous evidence that meets a "clear and convincing" burden of proof, Casey will most likely be found guilty.

Explanation:

In criminal charges, it is expected that the plaintiff will discharge the burden of proof.  The burden of proof is a legal duty which ensures that the truth of the facts are clearly established by the person alleging that a crime had been committed.  The accused (defendant) is initially presumed innocent under the doctrine of "presumption of innocence".  Then, the plaintiff must provide persuasive evidence to establish the truth (unambiguous evidence).  After establishing the truth of the facts (providing unambiguous evidence), the plaintiff has an added or heightened burden because he or she is still expected to provide convincing evidence to prove beyond all reasonable doubt (clear and convincing) that the defendant committed the crime.  This is the situation in a criminal case for a defendant to be found guilty.

Answer:

A market economy is an economy that is primarly based on free markets, where consumers and producers meet to buy and sell goods and services, and prices are set according to the forces of supply and demand.

A Soviet-style communist economy, is also known as a planned economy or command economy. This is an economy where private property does not exist, the government owns all property, and plans the economy with years of anticipation. Prices are set by the government, as well as the quantities of goods and services that are produced and delivered.

The problem with planned economies is that it becomes too difficult for the government to coordinate economic activity. The government lacks a lot of vital information, and ends up assigning resources to activities that are not efficient. These economies also lack proper prices, which are the signals that coordinate economic activity.

For that reason, the market economies prevailed over the planned economies, they were simply more efficient: better at producing more goods and services, at cheaper prices, and using less resources.

Answer:

The government, not the market, deciding

what gets produced leads to producing

many items consumers don’t want. - There was an abundance of flannel pants

and a lack of jeans.

Command economies have a lack of

incentives to produce what would sell. - The Communist Party “knew what everyone

needed" (or thought it did).

The government answers economic

questions in a command economy. - The Soviet Union’s economy was based

on centralized planning.

Resources can be misused when the

market doesn’t decide how resources

are used. - The emphasis was on military production,

not fashionable clothes.

Market systems respond to signals from

consumers. - Jeans were being sold in the West and

not in the Soviet Union.

Explanation:

PLATO

being funny or easy to talk to

Answer:A. A contract to deliver a praticular commodity to a buyer sometime in the future.

Explanation:

A forward contract is a contract to deliver a particular commodity to a buyer sometime in the future. Thus, the correct answer is option A.

A forward contract is a tailored agreement between two parties to purchase or sell an asset at a predetermined price on a future date. A forward contract can be used for hedging or speculation, but due to its non-standardized character, it is best suited for hedging.

Forward contracts are called over-the-counter (OTC) instruments because they are not traded on a centralized exchange. Forward contracts, for example, can help agricultural producers and consumers hedge against changes in the price of an underlying asset or commodity.

Financial organizations that initiate forward contracts face a higher level of settlement and default risk than contracts that are marked-to-market on a regular basis.

Therefore, the correct answer is A.

To learn more on forward contract, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/30021571

#SPJ2

Answer:

In effect, an argument is valid if the truth of the premises logically guarantees the truth of the conclusion.

Explanation:

Answer:

1.1099 form to prepare my taxes

2.The ADVANTAGE is that I will get to fill it out when compare with the W-2 which is already filled out and may take more money than I spent.

3. The DISADVANTAGE is that in a situation where anything I filled in the 1099 form is wrong the IRS may find out which means I will be the one to pay for the damage

Explanation:

1.Based on the module the option I would choose to prepare my taxes is that I will use the 1099 FORM TO PREPARE MY TAXES, reason been that it will gives me an option on telling either the government or IRS of the amount of money I spent in the year.

2.The ADVANTAGE is that I will get to fill it out when compare with the W-2 which is already filled out and may take more money than I spent.

The second ADVANTAGE with the 1099 is that I will definitely get to write an approximate of the amount of money I wasted and the amount of money I needed to get back from the IRS.

3. The DISADVANTAGE is that in a situation where anything I filled in the 1099 form is wrong the IRS may find out which means I will be the one to pay for the damage.

Second DISADVANTAGE is that in a situation where the information I wrote in that form is wrong the IRS will either give me a penalty or charge me more Amount of money.

Answer:

Late Majority.

Explanation:

The adoption of a product by consumers is divided into five categories, namely, innovators, early adopters, early majority, late majority, and laggards. Such customers are known as adopters who adopt to new technology differently. The category of adopters was proposed by Everett Rogers in 1962.

In the given scenario, Emy exemplifies Late majority adopter.

Late Majority adopters are those adopters who adopts new innovation or technology after observing that the product has been adopted fruitfully by the majority of society. They rank on the second last position of the adopters. They are more skeptical to the product before adopting it. So, Emy fits the late majority category of adopters as she is skeptical about the fancy device shown by her friend.

Answer:

yes

Explanation: