why is the second harmonic of a plucked guitar string liekly to be strionger than the first harmonic or fundamental when the string is plucked in the usual position

In a Young's double-slit experiment, the fringes are formed due to interference of the light waves. The wavelength of the light used in the experiment is 360 nm.

The distance between two adjacent fringes is given by the equation d(sinθ) = mλ, where d is the separation between the two slits, θ is the angle of the fringe with respect to the central maximum, m is the order of the fringe, and λ is the wavelength of the light.

In this problem, we are given that the fringes are 1.0 mm apart and the slit separation is also 1.0 mm.

Since the distance from the double slit to the screen is 1.8 m, we can assume that the angle θ is small, so we can use the small-angle approximation sinθ ≈ θ.

Substituting the given values in the equation, we get [tex]1.0 * 10^{-3} = (1.8/\theta) * \lambda[/tex].

Solving for λ, we get λ = [tex]3.6 * 10^{-7}[/tex] m or 360 nm.

To learn more about wavelength click here https://brainly.com/question/13533093

#SPJ11

The part functionality that does not depend on surface attributes is thermal conductivity. Thermal conductivity refers to a material's ability to conduct heat, and it is an intrinsic property of the material that does not depend on the surface of the material.

Friction and wear, corrosion resistance, and fatigue life are all surface attributes that affect the part functionality. Friction and wear are affected by the surface roughness, hardness, and lubrication of the material. Corrosion resistance is affected by the surface composition, passivation, and coating of the material. Fatigue life is affected by the surface finish, residual stresses, and microstructure of the material.

In contrast, thermal conductivity depends on the molecular structure and bonding of the material, which are intrinsic properties that do not change with the surface of the material. Therefore, thermal conductivity is not influenced by the surface attributes of a part, and it remains constant for a given material regardless of its surface conditions.

To know more about Thermal conductivity click this link -

brainly.com/question/7643131

#SPJ11

False. Two of the Galilean moons of Jupiter, namely Ganymede and Callisto, are indeed larger than Mercury.

Ganymede is the largest moon in the solar system and is even larger than the planet Mercury itself. Callisto is slightly smaller but still larger than Mercury. On the other hand, the other two Galilean moons, Io and Europa, are smaller than our moon but still substantial in size. Io is slightly smaller than Earth's moon, while Europa is slightly smaller than Io. So, while the statement is correct regarding the size of Ganymede and Callisto compared to Mercury, it is incorrect in stating that the other two moons are about the same size as our moon. The Galilean moons are the four largest moons of Jupiter, discovered by Galileo Galilei in 1610. They are named after him and include Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto.

Learn more about Galilean moons here:

https://brainly.com/question/31984770

#SPJ11

We expect the cosmic background radiation (CBR) to be almost, but not quite, the same in all directions due to two primary reasons: the initial conditions of the universe and the Doppler effect.

1. Initial Conditions of the Universe: The CBR is the remnant radiation from the early universe, specifically from the period known as recombination, when atoms formed from the primordial plasma. The universe was initially highly homogeneous and isotropic, meaning it had similar properties in all directions. This leads to the CBR being almost the same in all directions.

2. Doppler Effect: Despite the initial uniformity, there are small fluctuations in the CBR due to the motion of the Earth relative to the cosmic microwave background. This motion causes a Doppler effect, which results in a slight anisotropy in the observed CBR. The Doppler effect makes the CBR appear slightly hotter (blueshifted) in the direction of our motion and slightly cooler (redshifted) in the opposite direction.

So, the cosmic background radiation is expected to be almost the same in all directions because of the homogeneous and isotropic nature of the early universe, but not quite the same due to the Doppler effect caused by the Earth's motion relative to the cosmic microwave background.

To learn more about Doppler effect - brainly.com/question/15318474

#SPJ11

The potential difference between two points separated by a distance of 2 m along the x-axis is 10 V. The potential difference between two points separated by a distance of 3 m along the y-axis is 0 V. Yes, my answer is consistent with the answer to questions 2 and 3.

The potential difference between two points in an electric field is given by the product of the electric field strength and the distance between the two points. Therefore, the potential difference between two points separated by a distance of 2 m along the x-axis is 5 V/m * 2 m = 10 V. Similarly, the potential difference between two points separated by a distance of 3 m along the y-axis is 5 V/m * 0 m = 0 V, because the electric field is perpendicular to the y-axis and does not contribute to the potential difference. This is consistent with the fact that the electric field is uniform and only has a component in the x-direction.

To learn more about potential difference:

https://brainly.com/question/12198573

#SPJ11

The resistivity of the wire is 4.271 x 10^-8 Ωm.

To begin with, we need to use the formula for resistance:
R = ρ x L/A
where R is the resistance of the wire, ρ is the resistivity of the material, L is the length of the wire, and A is the cross-sectional area of the wire.
First, we need to calculate the cross-sectional area of the wire using its diameter:
d = 0.075 mm
r = d/2 = 0.0375 mm
A = π x r^2
A = π x (0.0375 mm)^2
A = 1.767 x 10^-6 m^2
Now, we can rearrange the formula for resistance to solve for resistivity:
ρ = RA/L
Substituting the given values:
R = 51 ω
A = 1.767 x 10^-6 m^2
L = 21 m

ρ = (51 ω x 1.767 x 10^-6 m^2) / 21 m
ρ = 4.271 x 10^-8 Ωm
Therefore, the resistivity of the wire is 4.271 x 10^-8 Ωm.

To know more about resistivity visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/29427458

#SPJ11

The capacitance of the capacitor is 1.38 microfarads (μF) (rounded to two significant figures).

The capacitance of a capacitor whose reactance is 111 Ω at a frequency of 84.0 Hz can be calculated using the formula:
Capacitive reactance (Xc) = 1 / (2πfC)
Where f is the frequency in Hertz, C is the capacitance in Farads, and π is approximately equal to 3.14.
Rearranging the formula, we get:
C = 1 / (2πfXc)
Substituting the given values, we get:
C = 1 / (2π x 84.0 Hz x 111 Ω)
C = 1.38 x 10^-6 Farads

To learn more about capacitance, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/17176550

#SPJ11

The 74AS138 is a 3-to-8 decoder/demultiplexer with active low outputs, while the 74AC08 is a quad 2-input AND gate. Both devices have different input and output characteristics, which can affect their compatibility when connected together.

In terms of input voltage levels, the 74AS138 has a high-level input voltage (VIH) of 2.0V minimum and a low-level input voltage (VIL) of 0.8V maximum, while the 74AC08 has a VIH of 2.0V minimum and a VIL of 0.8V maximum as well. This means that the input voltage levels of both devices are compatible with each other when supplied with VCC = 4.5V.

However, the output voltage levels of the 74AS138 may not be compatible with the input voltage levels of the 74AC08. The 74AS138 has active low outputs, which means that a logic high output voltage (VOH) is 0.5V maximum and a logic low output voltage (VOL) is 2.4V minimum when supplied with VCC = 4.5V. On the other hand, the 74AC08 has a VIH of 2.0V minimum and a VOL of 0.05V maximum when supplied with VCC = 4.5V. This means that the output voltage levels of the 74AS138 may not be able to drive the input voltage levels of the 74AC08, which can result in unreliable logic levels and/or damage to the devices.

To know more about AND gate visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/14183082

#SPJ11

In the nuclear transmutation 168 O (?, α) 137 N, the bombarding particle is a proton.

Nuclear transmutation involves changing one element into another by bombarding the target nucleus with a specific particle.

In this case, the target nucleus is 168 O (oxygen isotope), and the resulting nucleus is 137 N (nitrogen isotope). The α (alpha) particle indicates an alpha emission, meaning the target nucleus loses 2 protons and 2 neutrons.

To balance the nuclear equation, the bombarding particle must be a proton (1H), as it adds one proton to the nucleus.

Summary: In the given nuclear transmutation, a proton is the bombarding particle, converting 168 O into 137 N through an alpha emission.

Learn more about nucleus click here:

https://brainly.com/question/141626

#SPJ11

To determine the required rate at which the magnetic field (B) must increase to induce a current of 2.0 A in the coil, we can use Faraday's law of electromagnetic induction, which states:

ε = -N * dΦ/dt

where ε represents the induced electromotive force (emf), N is the number of turns in the coil, and dΦ/dt is the rate of change of magnetic flux.

The magnetic flux (Φ) through the coil can be calculated as:

Φ = B * A

where B is the magnetic field and A is the area of the coil.

Given:

N = 100 turns

Diameter of the coil (d) = 8.0 cm = 0.08 m

Radius of the coil (r) = 0.04 m (half of the diameter)

Wire diameter (d_wire) = 0.50 mm = 0.00050 m

Current (I) = 2.0 A

The area of the coil can be calculated as:

A = π * r²

The area of the wire can be calculated as:

A_wire = π * (d_wire/2)²

The effective area for magnetic flux can be calculated as:

A_eff = A - A_wire

Substituting the given values into the equations, we can find A_eff and then calculate the required rate of change of magnetic field (dB/dt):

A = π * (0.04)^2

A_wire = π * (0.00050/2)^2

A_eff = A - A_wire

Using the calculated effective area, we can find dB/dt:

ε = -N * dΦ/dt

ε = -N * (dB/dt) * A_eff

Rearranging the equation to solve for dB/dt:

dB/dt = -(ε / (N * A_eff))

Substituting the known values:

N = 100 turns

A_eff = Calculated value

ε = I (current) = 2.0 A

By plugging in the values and performing the calculation, you will obtain the required rate at which the magnetic field must increase to induce a current of 2.0 A in the coil.

Learn more about Coil here:

https://brainly.com/question/15237530

#SPJ11

The point where the electric field magnitude is e/4 is located 4 meters away from the isolated point charge.

The electric field due to a point charge decreases inversely with the square of the distance from the charge. Therefore, if the field magnitude is e at a distance of 2 meters, it will be (1/4)e at a distance of 4 meters. This is because the electric field strength is proportional to the inverse square of the distance from the point charge, so the field strength decreases rapidly with increasing distance.

In summary, the point where the electric field magnitude is e/4 is located 4 meters away from the isolated point charge due to the inverse square relationship between the electric field and distance from the charge.

Learn more about magnitude here:

brainly.com/question/14123452

#SPJ11

Rub the glass rod with silk to make it positively charged and the silk negatively charged. Bring one metal sphere near the silk and the other near the glass rod to transfer charges and obtain two spheres with equal but opposite charges.

One method of giving the spheres exactly equal but opposite charges using the given materials is:

1. Rub the glass rod with the silk to transfer some electrons from the glass to the silk. The glass will become positively charged and the silk will become negatively charged.

2. Bring one of the metal spheres close to the charged silk. Electrons from the negative charge on the silk will repel the electrons in the metal sphere, causing some electrons to move away from the sphere and towards the stand. This leaves the sphere with a positive charge.

3. Bring the other metal sphere close to the charged glass rod. Electrons from the positive charge on the glass will be attracted to the metal sphere, causing some electrons to move from the stand to the sphere. This leaves the sphere with a negative charge.

4. Check the charges on the spheres using an electroscope or a pith ball. If the charges are not exactly equal and opposite, repeat steps 2 and 3 until the desired charges are obtained.

By following this method, the two metal spheres will be given exactly equal but opposite charges, with one sphere having a positive charge and the other sphere having a negative charge.

Visit to know more about Positively charged:-

brainly.com/question/23532831

#SPJ11

Suppose that water waves have a wavelength of 3.8 m and a period of 1.7 s. The velocity of the water waves is 2.24 m/s.

Water waves are a type of disturbance or variation that propagate through water surfaces. These waves can be generated by wind, earthquakes, and other natural phenomena. Water waves are a type of disturbance or variation that propagate through water surfaces. These waves can be generated by wind, earthquakes, and other natural phenomena.
The velocity of a wave is given by the formula

v = λ/T,

where v is the velocity, λ is the wavelength, and T is the period.

Substituting the given values, we get

v = 3.8 m/1.7 s = 2.24 m/s.

Therefore, the velocity of the water waves is 2.24 m/s.

To learn more about, velocity, click here, https://brainly.com/question/30559316

#SPJ11

The  value in terms of 1m of oil is 1.25

To convert the pressure at a point from 1 meter of water to its equivalent value in meters of oil, we can use the following formula:

Pressure = height × density × gravity

Let's first find the pressure exerted by 1 meter of water.

1 g x 0.8 = 0,8

1 x g x 1m = 0.8 x g * h2

We are to solve for h2

h2 = 1 / 0.8

= 1.25

Hence tghe  value in terms of 1m of oil is 1.25

Read more on pressure here:https://brainly.com/question/28012687

#SPJ1

The net force pushing out on the window can be calculated using the formula:F = P * A. The net force pushing against the window is roughly 37,995 N, which is equivalent to 3.87 tonnes of force.

               First, we need to convert the pressures from atmospheres to Pascals:

Outside pressure = 0.96 atm = 96,000 Pa

Inside pressure = 1.0 atm = 101,325 Pa

The pressure difference is:

ΔP = P(outside) - P(inside)

ΔP = 96,000 - 101,325

ΔP = -5,325 Pa

Note that the pressure difference is negative, indicating that the net force will be pushing out on the window.

The area of the window is:

A = 3.4 * 2.1

A = 7.14 m^2

Now we can calculate the net force:

F = ΔP * A

F = -5,325 * 7.14

F = -37,994.5 N

The net force pushing out on the window is approximately 37,995 N, which is equivalent to approximately 3.87 tons of force.

To learn more about force:

https://brainly.com/question/13191643

#SPJ11

(a) The torque on the circular loop can be found using the formula τ = NABi, where N is the number of turns in the loop, A is the area of the loop, and B is the magnetic field strength. Since the loop is circular, its area can be expressed as A = πr², where r is the radius of the loop. We can also express the total length of the wire as L = 2πr, which means that r = L/(2π). Substituting these values into the formula for torque, we get τ = (π/2)BLi.

(b) If the same length of wire is used to form a square loop, its side length would be L/4. The area of the square loop would be A = (L/4)² = L²/16. Using the same formula for torque, we get τ = (BLi)L²/16. Comparing the two torques, we can see that the torque on the square loop is larger, since it has a larger area than the circular loop.
To find the torque on the circular loop carrying a current i with a total wire length L in a uniform magnetic field B parallel to the plane of the loop, we can use the formula τ = μ × B, where μ is the magnetic moment.

For a circular loop, the magnetic moment is given by μ = iA, where A is the area of the loop. Since A = πr^2 and L = 2πr, we can solve for r: r = L/(2π). The torque on the circular loop is then τ_c = iBπ(L/(2π))^2.
For the square loop with the same wire length, the side length is L/4. The area of the square loop is (L/4)^2. The magnetic moment μ_s = i(L/4)^2, and the torque τ_s = iB(L/4)^2.
Comparing the two torques, τ_c = iBπ(L/(2π))^2 and τ_s = iB(L/4)^2, the torque on the circular loop is larger due to the π factor in the formula.

To know more about Magnetic visit-

https://brainly.com/question/2841288

#SPJ11

The critical angle is the angle of incidence at which the angle of refraction is 90 degrees, resulting in total internal reflection. The sine of the critical angle can be calculated using Snell's Law: sin(?c) = 1/n, where n is the index of refraction. Therefore, for this glass with an index of refraction of 1.50, sin(?c) = 1/1.50 = 0.67. The correct answer is b) 0.67.

The index of refraction of a certain glass is 1.50, and you want to find the sine of the critical angle for total internal reflection at a glass-air interface. To calculate the sine of the critical angle, you can use the formula sin(?c) = n2/n1, where n2 is the index of refraction of air (1.00) and n1 is the index of refraction of the glass (1.50).

Plugging the values into the formula, sin(?c) = 1.00/1.50, which simplifies to sin(?c) = 0.67. Therefore, the sine of the critical angle for total internal reflection at a glass-air interface is 0.67 (option b).

To know more about refraction visit-

https://brainly.com/question/14760207
#SPJ11

The entropy change when 275 g of water is heated from 20.0°C to 80.0 °C is 236 J/K.

The formula for calculating the change in entropy is ΔS = Q/T, where Q is the heat added to the system and T is the temperature in Kelvin. In this case, we can use the specific heat capacity of water to calculate the heat added to the system.

First, we need to calculate the change in temperature:

ΔT = 80.0°C - 20.0°C = 60.0°C

Next, we can calculate the heat added to the system:

Q = mcΔT, where m is the mass of water and c is the specific heat capacity of water.

m = 275 g = 0.275 kg (converting from grams to kilograms)

c = 4.18 J/g°C (specific heat capacity of water)

Q = (0.275 kg)(4.18 J/g°C)(60.0°C) = 693.09 J

Finally, we can calculate the entropy change:

ΔS = Q/T

T = 20.0°C + 273.15 = 293.15 K (converting from Celsius to Kelvin)

ΔS = 693.09 J / 293.15 K = 2.36 J/K

Therefore, the entropy change is 236 J/K.

To learn more about Entropy click here

https://brainly.com/question/2899530

#SPJ11

The solid disk and the hoop will reach the bottom at the same time. both objects have the same acceleration down the incline, and since they are rolling without slipping.

their translational and rotational kinetic energies are related by the same factor. This means that their total energies are proportional to their masses and radii, but not their shape. Therefore, the objects will have the same speed at the bottom, and will reach it at the same time.

Learn more about speed here:

https://brainly.com/question/28224010

#SPJ11

The sample of water had 0.4994 kilograms of water when a 50.0-g piece of ice at 0.0°C is added to a sample of water at 8.0°C.

To solve this problem, we need to use the equation Q = mCΔT, where Q is the heat absorbed or released, m is the mass, C is the specific heat capacity, and ΔT is the change in temperature.
First, we need to calculate the heat released by the water. We know that the temperature decreased from 8.0°C to 0.0°C, so ΔT = -8.0°C. The specific heat capacity of water is 4.18 J/g°C, so the heat released by the water is:
Q = mCΔT
Q = (m)(4.18 J/g°C)(-8.0°C)
Q = -33.44m J
Next, we need to calculate the heat absorbed by the ice. We know that the ice melted, so the heat absorbed is equal to the heat of fusion of water, which is 334 J/g. The mass of the ice is 50.0 g, so the heat absorbed by the ice is:
Q = (m)(334 J/g)
Q = (50.0 g)(334 J/g)
Q = 16,700 J
Since energy is conserved, the heat absorbed by the ice is equal to the heat released by the water:
-33.44m J = 16,700 J
Solving for m, we get:
m = -16,700 J / -33.44 J/g°C
m = 499.4 g
Finally, we convert grams to kilograms:
m = 499.4 g / 1000 g/kg
m = 0.4994 kg

To learn more about temperature click here https://brainly.com/question/4160783

#SPJ11

Quasars are extremely bright and distant celestial objects that emit a large amount of energy, including radiation, X-rays, and radio waves. Their brightness is believed to come from the accretion of gas and dust onto a supermassive black hole at the center of a distant galaxy.

This accretion process generates a tremendous amount of energy that is emitted as radiation, making quasars visible from vast distances.

There is strong evidence to support the theory that quasars are the centers of distant galaxies. Firstly, observations have shown that quasars are often surrounded by a large amount of gas and dust, which is believed to be the material being pulled into the supermassive black hole at the center of the galaxy. Secondly, studies of the motion of stars within galaxies have shown that the centers of galaxies are often associated with massive objects, such as supermassive black holes, which are believed to be the engines powering quasars. Additionally, the distribution of galaxies and quasars in the universe suggests a close relationship between the two, with quasars found mainly in the centers of galaxies.

To Learn more about Quasars. Click this!

brainly.com/question/29982221

#SPJ11

The type of remnant we are observing here is likely a supernova remnant, which is formed when a massive star explodes at the end of its life. As the shockwave from the explosion expands outward, it interacts with the surrounding interstellar medium and heats it up, creating a bright and glowing shell of gas and dust.

While some supernova remnants do emit periodic flashes of radiation, known as pulsars, not all of them do. Pulsars are formed when the core of the original star collapses and spins rapidly, emitting beams of radiation that are visible as pulses as they rotate. However, not all supernova explosions result in the formation of a pulsar, and even if they do, the pulsar may not be visible from our vantage point on Earth.

There are a variety of factors that can influence whether or not a pulsar is visible from our location, including the orientation of the pulsar's spin axis relative to our line of sight, as well as the strength and shape of the beams of radiation it emits. Additionally, some pulsars may simply be too faint or distant to detect, even with our most advanced telescopes and instrumentation.

So while the absence of periodic flashes of radiation from the supernova remnant we are observing may be notable, it is not necessarily indicative of any particular phenomenon or anomaly. Rather, it may simply reflect the fact that the remnant does not contain a visible pulsar or that the pulsar is not detectable from our location.

To know more about supernova remnant, refer

https://brainly.com/question/31868825

#SPJ11

Smallest distance for constructive interference = λ ≈ 0.5 m

To answer this question, we need to use the equation for the interference of sound waves, which is given by:
I = I1 + I2 + 2I1I2cosΔφ
where I is the total intensity of the sound waves, I1 and I2 are the intensities of the individual waves emitted by the two loudspeakers, Δφ is the phase difference between the waves, and cosΔφ is the cosine of the phase difference.
a. If the speakers are in phase, then Δφ = 0, which means that cosΔφ = 1. In this case, the interference is maximum destructive when the waves are completely out of phase, which occurs when the path difference between the waves is equal to half a wavelength. The wavelength of the sound waves is given by:
λ = c/f
where c is the speed of sound in air (approximately 343 m/s at room temperature and atmospheric pressure), and f is the frequency of the waves (686 Hz). Therefore, the wavelength of the waves is:
λ = 343/686 = 0.5 m
Half a wavelength is therefore:
λ/2 = 0.25 m
This is the path difference that corresponds to maximum destructive interference. The distance between the two speakers is equal to this path difference, since the waves are emitted along the x-axis. Therefore, the smallest distance between the speakers for maximum destructive interference is 0.25 m.
b. If the speakers are out of phase, then Δφ = π, which means that cosΔφ = -1. In this case, the interference is maximum constructive when the waves are completely in phase, which occurs when the path difference between the waves is equal to an integer number of wavelengths.
d = λ = 0.5 m
This is the smallest distance for which maximum constructive interference occurs when the speakers are out of phase.
a. For maximum destructive interference when speakers are in phase, the path difference between the sound waves should be an odd multiple of half the wavelength (λ/2). The smallest distance corresponds to the first odd multiple, which is simply λ/2.
To find the wavelength, use the formula: λ = v / f, where v is the speed of sound (approximately 343 m/s at room temperature) and f is the frequency (686 Hz).
λ = 343 m/s / 686 Hz ≈ 0.5 m
Smallest distance for destructive interference = λ/2 ≈ 0.5 m / 2 ≈ 0.25 m
b. For maximum constructive interference when speakers are out of phase, the path difference should be an even multiple of half the wavelength (nλ/2). The smallest distance corresponds to the first even multiple, which is 1λ.

The smallest distance between the speakers for maximum destructive interference is approximately 0.25 meters. the smallest distance between the speakers for maximum constructive interference is 0.5 meters.

To determine the smallest distance between the speakers for maximum destructive interference (when the speakers are in phase) and maximum constructive interference (when the speakers are out of phase), we need to consider the interference pattern created by the sound waves.

a. Maximum Destructive Interference (Speakers in Phase):

In destructive interference, the crests of one sound wave coincide with the troughs of the other, resulting in cancellation. For maximum destructive interference, the path difference between the two speakers must be half a wavelength (λ/2).

The formula for the path difference is given by:

Δx = (m + 1/2) * λ/2

Where:

Δx = Path difference

m = Integer representing the order of destructive interference

λ = Wavelength of the sound wave

Since the frequency of the sound wave is given as 686 Hz, we can find the wavelength (λ) using the formula:

λ = c / f

Where:

c = Speed of sound in air (approximately 343 m/s at room temperature)

f = Frequency of the sound wave (686 Hz)

Substituting the values:

λ = 343 m/s / 686 Hz

λ ≈ 0.5 m (approximately)

To find the smallest distance for maximum destructive interference, we set m = 0 to minimize the path difference:

Δx = (0 + 1/2) * 0.5 m

Δx ≈ 0.25 m

Therefore, the smallest distance between the speakers for maximum destructive interference is approximately 0.25 meters.

b. Maximum Constructive Interference (Speakers out of Phase):

In constructive interference, the crests of one sound wave coincide with the crests of the other, resulting in reinforcement. For maximum constructive interference, the path difference between the two speakers must be an integer number of wavelengths (m * λ).

Using the same wavelength (λ) calculated in part a (approximately 0.5 m), we can find the smallest distance for maximum constructive interference by setting m = 1 to minimize the path difference:

Δx = 1 * 0.5 m

Δx = 0.5 m

Therefore, the smallest distance between the speakers for maximum constructive interference is 0.5 meters.

Learn more about destructive interference

https://brainly.com/question/31857527

#SPJ4

The de Broglie wavelength of an electron traveling at a speed of 5.0×10^6 m/s is 12.4 pm.

The de Broglie wavelength is given by λ = h/mv, where h is Planck's constant, m is the mass of the particle, and v is the velocity of the particle. Substituting the values, we get λ = 6.626×10^-34 J s / (9.109×10^-31 kg)(5.0×10^6 m/s) = 12.4 pm. This result shows that even though electrons have very small mass, they exhibit wave-like properties when they move at high speeds. The de Broglie wavelength is an important concept in quantum mechanics and has been verified experimentally in many different settings.

Learn more about Wavelength here.

brainly.com/question/16103470

#SPJ11

The more massive a white dwarf, the smaller its radius.

A white dwarf is a remnant of a low to intermediate-mass star which has exhausted its nuclear fuel and undergone gravitational collapse. As a result of this collapse, the white dwarf's core becomes degenerate and is supported by electron degeneracy pressure.

This is because of the nature of electron degeneracy pressure. As a white dwarf's mass increases, its electrons become more tightly packed, and its velocity increases. As a result, the pressure they exert on each other also increases, pushing the outer layers of the white dwarf inward, causing the star's radius to decrease.

In conclusion, the more massive a white dwarf, the smaller its radius. This is due to the nature of electron degeneracy pressure, which becomes stronger as they become more tightly packed. A more massive white dwarf will eventually undergo further collapse and evolve into a neutron star or black hole.

To know more about white dwarf, visit:

https://brainly.in/question/50062726

#SPJ11

The width of the central maximum on the screen is approximately [tex]4.219 * 10^{-6} m[/tex], or 4.219 µm.

To determine the width of the central maximum of the diffraction pattern produced by helium-neon laser light (λ = 632.8 nm) passing through a single slit of width 0.30 mm, you can use the formula for the angular width of the central maximum in a single-slit diffraction experiment:
θ = (2 * λ) / slit width
First, convert the given measurements to meters: λ = 632.8 nm = [tex]632.8 * 10^{-9} m[/tex], and slit width = 0.30 mm = [tex]0.30 * 10^{-3} m[/tex]. Next, calculate the angular width:
θ = [tex](2 * 632.8 * 10^{-9} m) / (0.30 * 10^{-3} m) = 4.219 * 10^{-6}[/tex] radians
Now, to find the width of the central maximum on a screen 1.0 m behind the slit, use the formula:
Width = distance to screen * θ
Width = [tex]1.0 m * 4.219 * 10^{-6} radians[/tex] ≈ [tex]4.219 * 10^{-6} m[/tex]

To learn more about diffraction click here https://brainly.com/question/12290582

#SPJ11

To determine the initial speed with which the ball was thrown, we can analyze the horizontal and vertical components of its motion separately.

Since the ball is thrown horizontally from the top of the hill, its initial vertical velocity is 0 m/s. We can use the equation of motion for vertical motion:

Δy = V₀y * t + (1/2) * g * t²

In this case, Δy represents the vertical displacement (which is the height of the hill, 20 m), V₀y represents the initial vertical velocity (0 m/s), g represents the acceleration due to gravity (approximately 9.8 m/s²), and t represents the time of flight.

Substituting the known values:

20 = 0 * t + (1/2) * 9.8 * t²

20 = 4.9 * t²

t² = 20 / 4.9

t ≈ 2.04 s

Since the time of flight for the ball is 2.04 seconds, we can now determine the initial horizontal velocity using the equation:

V₀x = Δx / t

In this case, Δx represents the horizontal displacement, which is equal to the distance traveled horizontally when the ball strikes the ground (which we don't have in the given information).

Therefore, without the horizontal displacement or any additional information, we cannot determine the exact initial speed with which the ball was thrown.

Learn more about Displacement and Speed here:

https://brainly.com/question/16738360

#SPJ11