WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST!!! Should foreigners, currently residing in the United States, have the right to vote? why or why not

Answer:

it's ok

Explanation:

i guess the singer ruel is ok

Answer:

same i love the song younger

Explanation:

Answer:

D. The Revolutionary Era

Answer:

D

Explanation:

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Answer:

This book is about the American ancestors or the persecuted pilgrims who traveled first from England to Holland and stayed (1608-1620) and then on the ship called Mayflower to Plymouth, New England (1620). ... But it will be of great scholastic use for historians and American scholars who need original accounts.Because the Puritan era was already on the wane in 1630 when he began writing Of Plymouth Plantation, Bradford wanted to make sure that neither the history of the journey on the Mayflower in 1620, nor the early years of the Massachusetts Bay Colony were forgotten by future generations.

Explanation:

Answer:

After Jesus' death, the apostles and other disciples spread his message. ... The work of missionaries like Paul who traveled to preach Jesus' message helped Christianity grow from a small sect within Judaism to a major world religion. Paul played one of the most influential roles in spreading Christianity.

Explanation:

Answer:

Africa was divided among European imperial powers

Explanation:

Answer:

Establishing the Georgia Colony, 1732-1750

In the 1730s, England founded the last of its colonies in North America. The project was the brain child of James Oglethorpe, a former army officer. After Oglethorpe left the army, he devoted himself to helping the poor and debt-ridden people of London, whom he suggested settling in America. His choice of Georgia, named for the new King, was also motivated by the idea of creating a defensive buffer for South Carolina, an increasingly important colony with many potential enemies close by. These enemies included the Spanish in Florida, the French in Louisiana and along the Mississippi River, and these powers' Indian allies throughout the region.

Map of Virginia, Maryland and the Carolinas, 1714

General Maps

Twenty trustees received funding from Parliament and a charter from the King, issued in June 1732. The charter granted the trustees the powers of a corporation; they could elect their own governing body, make land grants, and enact their own laws and taxes. Since the corporation was a charitable body, none of the trustees could receive any land from, or hold a paid position in, the corporation. Too, since the undertaking was designed to benefit the poor, the trustees placed a 500-acre limit on the size of individual land holdings. People who had received charity and who had not purchased their own land could not sell, or borrow money against, it. The trustees wanted to avoid the situation in South Carolina, which had very large plantations and extreme gaps between the wealthy and the poor.

The undertaking was paternalistic through and through. For example, the trustees did not trust the colonists to make their own laws. They therefore did not establish a representative assembly, although every other mainland colony had one. The trustees made all laws for the colony. Second, the settlements were laid out in compact, confined, and concentrated townships. In part, this arrangement was instituted to enhance the colony's defenses, but social control was another consideration. Third, the trustees prohibited the import and manufacture of rum, for rum would lead to idleness. Finally, the trustees prohibited Negro slavery, for they believed that this ban would encourage the settlement of "English and Christian" people.

Georgia's first year, 1733, went well enough, as settlers began to clear the land, build houses, and construct fortifications. Those who came in the first wave of settlement realized that after the first year they would be working for themselves. Meanwhile, Oglethorpe, who went to Georgia with the first settlers, began negotiating treaties with local Indian tribes, especially the Upper Creek tribe. Knowing that the Spanish, based in Florida, had great influence with many of the tribes in the region, Oglethorpe thought it necessary to reach an understanding with these native peoples if Georgia was to remain free from attack. In addition, the Indian trade became an important element of Georgia's economy.

It didn't take long, however, until the settlers began to grumble about all the restrictions imposed on them by the trustees. In part, this grumbling may have been due to the fact that most of those moving to Georgia after the first several years were from other colonies, especially South Carolina. These settlers viewed restrictions on the size of individual land holdings as a sure pathway to poverty. They also opposed restrictions on land sales and the prohibition against slavery for the same reason. They certainly did not like the fact that they were deprived of any self-government and their rights as Englishmen. By the early 1740s, the trustees slowly gave way on most of the colonists' grievances.

For additional documents related to these topics, search The Capital and the Bay collection using such key words as James Oglethorpe, Georgia (and individual towns such as Savannah and Ebenezer), South Carolina (and Charles Town), Negro, slavery, and such individual Indian tribes as Creek (both Upper and Lower), Choctaw, and Cherokee. Another way to find documents relating to the colonization of Georgia is to peruse the four volumes edited by Peter Force (in the 1830s) in the The Capital and the Bay.

Explanation:

Answer:

french settlers

Explanation:

because they just wanted to trade. they didnt want land

Answer:

brown

Explanation:

Answer:Brown

Explanation:

Explanation:

1. In the Supreme Court Case: (the United States v. Lopez (1995) the plaintiff was Alfonso Lopez, and the defendant was the federal government (the United States).

2. The case brought to court because Mr. Lopez was found guilty and sentenced by a Texas court because he brought a firearm into school premises, which violated the Gun-Free Zone Act of 1990, a federal offense.

3. The goal of the defendants was to argue that the federal government overstepped its authority by applying the Gun-Free Schools Act law to the state and that the Gun-Free Schools Zone Act was a criminal law that was not under the Commerce Clause of the constitution. In other words, he was convicted using federal law even though schools were supposed to be controlled by their state laws; thus, they wanted the sentencing overturned.

4. The bill of rights amendment 2 and amendment 10 were involved in the case. In other words, "the Right to Bear Arms" and the power of the state not granted to the federal government was involved.

5. The case centers on civil rights, considering the fact it involved seeking a fair trial; as the accused felt the law used to charge him was unlawfully used.

6. Chief Justice William Rehnquist who supported the majority decision said, “The possession of a gun in a local school zone is in no sense an economic activity...and there is no requirement that his possession of the firearm have any concrete tie to interstate commerce. "

In other words, the Commerce clause did not apply here, as Lopez's possession of a gun had nothing to do with commerce so as to warrant the federal government's involvement in the case.

7. The decision was a 5-4 decision by the justices. It seems some justices still felt that the Act did not violate the Constitution. The 4 who voted against were of the opinion that the federal government (Congress) still has the authority under the constitution to apply the Act to states.

8. The case has been a precedent to show that it is unlawful for the federal government to overstep its authority when the constitution doesn't allow that. The impact of the case has reechoed the importance of the separation of powers in American society.

Answer:

1. Identify the plaintiff and defendant in the case.

The plaintiff is Otis McDonald and the defendant is the City of Chicago.

2. Explain why the case was brought to the Supreme Court.

This case was brought to the Supreme Court in 2008, when Otis McDonald, a retired custodian sued the city of Chicago to question the validity of a 1982 Chicago law, which banned the registration of handguns and required registration as a prerequisite of possession of a firearm.

3. Describe the goal of each side in the case. Why was the case brought to the court, and what type of decision was desired?

The goal of the defendant was to argue that states should have the authority over firearm regulation. The goal of McDonald’s argument was that the Second Amendment protects the rights of American citizens, which the states should not abridge. The type of decision desired was the court ruling in favor of McDonald and the principles of the Second Amendment.

4. Explain the key rights or amendments involved in the case.

The key right involved in this case is the right of a person to carry a firearm; the amendments involved in this case are the Second and Fourteenth Amendments. The Second Amendment emphasizes the right of an individual to “keep and bear arms”, which is incorporated in the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

5. Did the case primarily center on an issue of civil rights or liberties, or does it primarily center on other issues? Explain.

This case primarily centers on an issue of civil liberties because it debates whether or not a person could bear a firearm on his or her own right; without interference from the state, in which that person lives in.

6. Describe the majority decision of the court and several arguments as to why the justices ruled the way they did.

The Supreme Court ruled, in a 5-4 decision, that the Second Amendment’s principle, which is under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, applies mainly applies to all federal, state, and local governments; ergo ruling in favor of McDonald.

7. If there was one dissenting decision of the court, explain it in detail. Why did some justices disagree with the majority?

One dissenting decision of the court was made by judges Stephan Breyer, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Sonia Sotomayor was that the jury’s “historical analysis was flawed and that historical evidence bearing upon the federal character of a ‘private armed self -defense right’ was unclear at best” (Britannica).

8. What precedent was set by the court’s decision? What impact did it have on US society?

The precedent that was set by the court’s decision was that a person’s right to own a firearm should not be infringed upon by federal, state, and local governments. This case impacted the United States society by changing the long-held concepts of federalism.

Explanation:

The "burden” Europeans had to bear in  the "The White Man’s Burden:

Thus, options A, C, and D are correct.

Although it is difficult and unappreciated work, Kipling is pushing white people (which consists of U.S.) to carry the "burden" of empire as had Britain alongside other European nations did before.

The poet makes the case in his poem that the gallant Europeans must take up the fight and put up a great effort to civilize the barbaric natives. He sees it as a burden for them because they must assist others while getting nothing in return.

Words like exile, utilize, and tie is used to describe the load they are carrying. In essence, the poet uses Whitman's Burden thesis to defend colonization.

Therefore, option  A, C, and D is correct.

Learn more about the White Man’s Burden, here:

https://brainly.com/question/30128905

#SPJ5

Answer:

Caribbean sea

Explanation:

The Fifteenth Amendment is the one in which the federal government cannot prohibit a person's right to vote regardless of their race or color.

Answer:

b

Explanation:

im pretty sure

Answer:

a library

Explanation:

i just took the flvs exam.

Answer:

A library

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:

biden is riding on a horse and tied trump with a rope and pulling blc he lost and he says im still the winner but biden won

Answer: C

Explanation:Just like your federal representatives, your state legislators are elected by their constituents.

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer:

true ,looked it up and yeah makes sense

Answer:

African heritage

southern black folk traditions

african american voice

Explanation:

hope this helps!

Answer:

A: Territory

Explanation:

I majored in History.

Answer:

sining teknolohiya at pamahalaan

Explanation:

sana makatulong kung tama

Answer:

Before the end of the Age of Division, Buddhism had gained a remarkable hold in China. It appealed to people in China above all because it addressed questions of suffering and death with a directness unmatched in native traditions. Factors such as the support of the general population and royal patronage helped Buddhism spread throughout China.

Answer:

Congress of Vienna: Meeting among the great powers of Europe, i.e., Great Britain, Austria, Prussia, and Russia (France participated in some of the decisions) in Vienna, Austria from September 1814 to June 1815. These powers met to arrange a peace settlement after almost a decade of war against Napoleon.

Explanation:

Answer: Aeneid

Explanation:

Answer:

Lol I think u forgot the pic

Explanation: