a report that gives status updates on a current project is called . a. the minutes of a meeting b. a progress report c. an analytical report

Jane's GDS ratio is below the bank's requirement of 30%, she should be able to obtain the $80,000 mortgage at 8% interest, paid monthly.

To determine if Jane Doe can obtain the mortgage, we first need to calculate her monthly gross income and monthly housing expenses.

Jane's monthly gross income can be calculated as follows:

$30,000 / 12 months = $2,500 per month

Next, we need to calculate her monthly housing expenses. This includes the monthly mortgage payment and property taxes. The monthly mortgage payment can be calculated using the following formula:

[tex]M = P [ i(1 + i)^n ] / [ (1 + i)^n - 1][/tex]

where M is the monthly mortgage payment, P is the principal amount of the mortgage, i is the monthly interest rate, and n is the number of months in the mortgage term.

For Jane's mortgage, we have:

P = $80,000

i = 8% / 12 = 0.0067

n = 30 years * 12 months per year = 360 months

Plugging in these values, we get:

[tex]M = $80,000 [ 0.0067(1 + 0.0067)^{360 }] / [ (1 + 0.0067)^{360 - 1 ][/tex]= $587.82 per month

Adding the property taxes, we have:

$587.82 + ($1,200 / 12) = $687.82 per month

Finally, we can calculate Jane's gross debt service ratio (GDS) by dividing her monthly housing expenses by her monthly gross income and multiplying by 100%:

GDS = ($687.82 / $2,500) x 100% = 27.51%

Since Jane's GDS ratio is below the bank's requirement of 30%, she should be able to obtain the $80,000 mortgage at 8% interest, paid monthly.

For more such questions on interest visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29415701

#SPJ11

True. The annuity formula is commonly used by mortgage bankers and lenders to calculate the amortization schedule of a loan.

An amortization schedule is a table that breaks down each loan payment into its principal and interest components over the life of the loan. This schedule allows borrowers to understand how much of each payment goes towards paying down the principal balance and how much goes toward paying interest.

The annuity formula is based on the concept of level payments, which means that the borrower makes the same fixed payment amount every period (e.g. every month or every year) until the loan is fully paid off. The formula takes into account the loan amount, interest rate, and loan term to determine the fixed payment amount required to fully repay the loan over its term.

Therefore, it is true that the annuity formula is used by mortgage bankers to compute the amortization schedule of a loan.

To learn more about “principal” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/28020457

#SPJ11

No deposit creation occurs if the bank doesn't lend the extra reserves. The deposit creation process requires banks to use excess reserves for lending.

The First National Bank may utilise the additional $100 in reserves to make loans, generating new deposits in the process. However, no new deposits will be created for the whole banking system if the bank decides not to lend any of these reserves.

Banks employ their excess reserves to fund loans, which results in the formation of new deposits. Without lending, there would be no new deposit generation, and the money supply would remain constant.

Learn more about deposit:

https://brainly.com/question/28861154

#SPJ4

This statement is incorrect. Philosophers have different views on whether corporations are moral agents and whether assigning moral responsibility to individuals in companies is important.

Divergent philosophical perspectives exist about the morality of companies. While some contend that businesses have moral duties and may be held morally accountable for their deeds, others contend that only individuals can act in a morally upright manner. For a firm to make ethical judgements, corporate internal decision structures (CID) are still crucial.

It might be challenging to ascribe moral culpability for the company's actions to specific employees, yet doing so is essential for accountability. Although it makes sense to refer to businesses as moral beings, this should not relieve those who work for them of their duties.

Learn more about Philosophers:

https://brainly.com/question/16999698

#SPJ4

It is absurd to speak to businesses as moral agents, either literally or informally when discussing the duties of those who work for them.

It is illogical to refer to companies as moral actors, according to the examination of corporate moral agency in Chapter 5. This is so because businesses are different legal entities from the people who work for them and lack the same ability for moral judgment and action as unique human beings. It may be feasible for companies to make choices and take actions that have moral repercussions, but it is impossible to hold a corporation as a whole morally accountable. The people who work for the firm and make choices and take acts on its behalf must instead bear the moral responsibility for the organization's behavior. However, this could be challenging, Sometimes it can be difficult to pinpoint specific persons who are in charge of specific acts or choices in corporations due to their complicated organizational structures and decision-making procedures.

learn more about moral agents here:

https://brainly.com/question/13513531

#SPJ11

The departure rate in context to the given question is 6.75 veh/min.

the arrival rate is already given in the question, now we need to find the departure rate

Given,

Arrival rate = 6 veh/min

Total vehicle delay = 5000 veh/min

therefore, we need to implement the formula

Total vehicle delay =  total number of vehicles in the line x time spend in the line

adding the  given values in the given formula

restructuring the formula concerning the departure rate

500 = 36x (1/departure rate - 1/ arrival rate)

500/36 = 1/departure rate - 1/6

departure rate = 36/500 - 1/6

departure rate = 6.75 veh/min

The departure rate in context to the given question is 6.75 veh/min.

To learn more about arrival rate,

https://brainly.com/question/15541849

#SPJ4

The technique used to determine which forces could act for a proposed change and which forces could act against it is referred to as force-field analysis.

Force-field analysis is a powerful decision-making tool that helps individuals and organizations to identify and evaluate the factors that can facilitate or hinder the success of a proposed change.

In force-field analysis, the proposed change is considered as the driving force, and the forces that could support or oppose the change are identified as the restraining forces. The driving forces are those factors that push the organization towards the change, while the restraining forces are those factors that resist the change. By identifying both the driving and restraining forces, an organization can determine the feasibility of the proposed change and develop a plan to overcome the resistance to change.

Force-field analysis is used in many areas of business, including project management, change management, and innovation. It is a valuable tool that helps organizations to make informed decisions by identifying the potential risks and benefits associated with a proposed change. By using force-field analysis, organizations can create a roadmap for change that includes strategies for minimizing the resistance to change and maximizing the driving forces.

for more such questions on forces

https://brainly.com/question/24453374

#SPJ11

The loanable funds market is where savers provide funds for borrowers to use for investment purposes.

In equilibrium, the quantity of loanable funds supplied equals the quantity demanded. This is represented by a graph with the real interest rate on the y-axis and the quantity of loanable funds on the x-axis. The supply and demand curves intersect at the equilibrium real interest rate and equilibrium quantity.

A decrease in the money supply shifts the supply curve for loanable funds to the left, as there are fewer funds available for lending. This leads to a higher real interest rate and a lower quantity of loanable funds at the new equilibrium point.

At the original equilibrium, there is now a shortage of loanable funds, as the quantity demanded exceeds the quantity supplied. Lenders of existing fixed-rate loans are worse off, as the real interest rate increases, reducing the value of their existing loans.

Investment spending on facilities and equipment is negatively impacted, as the higher real interest rate discourages borrowing and investment due to increased borrowing costs. This may lead to reduced economic growth in the long run.

Learn more about loanable funds at

https://brainly.com/question/29453063

#SPJ11

The comparable annual salary today, adjusted for inflation, is $3,691.81 rounded to the nearest cent

To calculate the comparable annual earnings today, we want to adjust the future income of $40,000 for inflation using the present value method.

The present value formula for a future payment can be expressed as:

[tex]PV = FV / (1 + r)^n[/tex]

Where:

PV is the present price

FV is the future price

r is the interest fee or discount charge

n is the range of periods

In this example, the future profits is $forty,000 in 30 years, and the annual inflation rate is five% compounded yearly. consequently, we are able to use the present value system with the following values:

FV = $40,000

r = 5%

n = 30

[tex]PV = $40,000 / (1 + 0.05)^{30[/tex]

PV = $40,000 / 10.835

PV = $3,691.81

Therefore, the comparable annual salary today, adjusted for inflation, is $3,691.81.

Learn more about present value formula:-

https://brainly.com/question/30390056

#SPJ4

Using the given historical data and weights, the expected return and variance of the T-bills and S&P 500 index portfolios are:

Expected return: 9.2% for the 0.6 T-bill/0.4 S&P 500 portfolio and 8.4% for the 0.8 T-bill/0.2 S&P 500 portfolio.

Variance: 1.25% for the 0.6 T-bill/0.4 S&P 500 portfolio and 0.36% for the 0.8 T-bill/0.2 S&P 500 portfolio.

To calculate the expected return of each portfolio, we multiply the weight of each asset (T-bills and S&P 500) by its expected return and sum the results. For example, the expected return of the 0.6 T-bill/0.4 S&P 500 portfolio is:

(0.6 x 6%) + (0.4 x (6% + 8%)) = 9.2%

To calculate the variance of each portfolio, we use the formula:

Variance = (w1^2 x σ1^2) + (w2^2 x σ2^2) + 2(w1 x w2 x σ1 x σ2 x ρ)

where w1 and w2 are the weights of the two assets, σ1 and σ2 are their standard deviations, and ρ is the correlation between them (which we assume to be 0 since they are uncorrelated). For example, the variance of the 0.6 T-bill/0.4 S&P 500 portfolio is:

(0.6^2 x 0) + (0.4^2 x 0.28^2) = 0.0125 or 1.25%

The variance of the 0.8 T-bill/0.2 S&P 500 portfolio is:

(0.8^2 x 0) + (0.2^2 x 0.28^2) = 0.0036 or 0.36%

These calculations can help investors make informed decisions about how to allocate their assets between T-bills and the S&P 500 index.

For more questions like Portfolio click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/29333981

#SPJ11

According to the 2011 Harvard Business Review study, the change in configuration of boards that has been brought about by government legislation is the increase in the percentage of directors that are independent.

The change was likely a response to financial crises and corporate scandals, as regulators and investors called for greater transparency and accountability in corporate governance.

Independent directors are those who do not have any affiliations or relationships with the company or its executives, and are therefore more likely to provide unbiased oversight and hold management accountable.

The increase in independent directors on boards is a positive development for corporate governance, as it helps to ensure that boards are able to effectively oversee the company's strategy, risk management, and financial performance.

Learn more about financial crisis at

https://brainly.com/question/30188811

#SPJ11

The maximum value that can be reached using the HHI is 10,000. This occurs when there is a pure monopoly, and one firm holds 100% of the market share.

Learn more about the Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI): https://brainly.com/question/10559061

#SPJ11      

The supplier is permitted to charge the retailer $1 per tube of toothpaste for all 10,000 tubes that were ordered by the retailer within the 45-day time frame of the original offer.

The supplier is permitted to charge the retailer $1 per tube of toothpaste for the first 10,000 tubes. This is because the offer committed the supplier to providing the retailer with up to 10,000 tubes of toothpaste over the next 45 days at $1 a tube, and the retailer ordered a total of 10,000 tubes within that time frame.

However, the supplier is not permitted to charge the retailer $1.10 per tube of toothpaste, as they informed the retailer of this price increase after the retailer had already placed an order for 6,000 tubes at the original price of $1 per tube. Therefore, the supplier must honor the original price of $1 per tube for the remaining 4,000 tubes that the retailer ordered.

learn more about Retailer here:

https://brainly.com/question/31074275

#SPJ11

The statement "A Unique Identifier has a NULL value for each instance of the entity for the lifetime of the instance" is false because each entity instance can be precisely identified using its Unique Identifier

A Unique Identifier is a value assigned to an instance of an entity that distinguishes it from all other instances in the system. This is important for maintaining consistency and preventing ambiguity, as each entity instance can be precisely identified using its Unique Identifier.

Having a NULL value for each instance of the entity would contradict the purpose of a Unique Identifier. A NULL value indicates the absence of a value or an unknown value, which means it cannot uniquely identify an instance.

In fact, the Unique Identifier should always have a non-NULL value to serve its purpose of uniquely identifying an instance for its entire lifetime.

Furthermore, Unique Identifiers are often enforced through primary keys in databases, which automatically ensure that there are no NULL values or duplicate values for the field serving as the primary key.

In summary, the statement is false because Unique Identifiers must have non-NULL values to effectively and consistently distinguish between different instances of an entity throughout their lifetimes.

To know more about entity, refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/13437425#

#SPJ11

The entity  is responsible for reviewing change requests and determining their approval, denial,  deferral is commonly known as a change control board (CCB).

A CCB is typically comprised of cross-functional team members who are responsible for evaluating the impact of proposed changes on different areas of the organization, including technical, operational, financial, and regulatory considerations.

The CCB's primary responsibility is to ensure that changes are made in a controlled and consistent manner to minimize risks, maintain quality, and support business objectives. The CCB must review all proposed changes and assess their impact before approving or denying them. The CCB must also ensure that proper testing and validation procedures are in place to guarantee the stability and integrity of the organization's systems and processes.

The CCB's role is crucial in ensuring that changes are implemented smoothly and with minimal disruption to business operations. By conducting thorough assessments of change requests and their potential impact, the CCB can provide the necessary guidance and oversight to ensure that changes are executed efficiently and effectively. As such, the CCB is an essential component of any organization's change management framework, and its decisions can have far-reaching consequences for the success of the organization.

The Question was Incomplete, Find the full content below :

This entity is responsible for reviewing change requests, reviewing the analysis of the impact of the change, and determining whether the change is approved, denied, or deferred.

Know more about CCB here:

https://brainly.com/question/13418015

#SPJ11

Compound interest is the interest earned on both the principal amount and any previously accumulated interest on a sum of money.

The correct answer is option e. Y < Z < X. The formula for compound interest is:A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)
Where:
A = final amount
P = principal amount
r = nominal annual interest rate (as a decimal)
n = number of times the interest is compounded per year
t = time (in years)

For Fred:
P = $1200
r = 4.8% = 0.048
n = 12 (monthly compounding)
t = 1

Using the formula, we get:
X = 1200(1 + 0.048/12)^(12*1)
X = $1270.06

For Jane:
P = $1200
r = 4.8% = 0.048
n = 1 (annual compounding)
t = 1

Using the formula, we get:
Y = 1200(1 + 0.048/1)^(1*1)
Y = $1257.60

For Sam:
P = $1200
r = 4.8% = 0.048
n = continuous compounding
t = 1

Using the formula, we get:
Z = 1200e^(0.048*1)
Z = $1258.96

Therefore, the order of balances from lowest to highest is:
Y < Z < X

So the correct answer is option e. Y < Z < X.

To learn more about “compound interest” refer to the https://brainly.com/question/28020457

#SPJ11

The statement "to measure the effectiveness of advertising as a promotional tool, the sport marketer can evaluate impact on sales, image, and consumer awareness" is true.

Evaluating the impact of advertising on sales, image, and consumer awareness is a common way to measure the effectiveness of advertising as a promotional tool.

Sales are a direct indicator of how effective an advertisement has been in generating revenue for the business. If sales have increased following an advertising campaign, it can be an indication that the advertisement has been effective in promoting the product or service.

Image refers to how the advertisement has impacted the brand image of the product or service being advertised. A successful advertisement can help to establish a positive image of the brand in the minds of consumers, which can lead to increased sales and brand loyalty.

Consumer awareness measures how well an advertisement has reached its target audience and how well it has been received.

By measuring consumer awareness, the sport marketer can determine if the advertisement has successfully reached its intended audience and if it has had a positive impact on their perception of the product or service being advertised.

In summary, evaluating the impact of advertising on sales, image, and consumer awareness can help the sport marketer to determine the effectiveness of advertising as a promotional tool.

To know more about advertisement refer here

https://brainly.com/question/3163475#

#SPJ11

Based on these calculations, we can see that Project B has a higher IRR than Project A. However, choosing a project based solely on its IRR can be misleading because it does not take into account the size of the investment or the actual dollar amounts of the cash flows.

To determine whether we agree with the decision to choose Project B over Project A based on their respective IRRs, we need to calculate the IRRs for both projects and compare them.

To calculate the IRR for Project A, we need to find the discount rate that makes the present value of the expected cash flows equal to zero. Using Excel or a financial calculator, we find that the IRR for Project A is approximately 22.31%.

To calculate the IRR for Project B, we need to find the discount rate that makes the present value of the expected cash flows equal to zero. Using Excel or a financial calculator, we find that the IRR for Project B is approximately 25.44%.

To know more about IRR click here

brainly.com/question/31319948

#SPJ11

The future dollar cost of meeting this obligation using the money market hedge is $15,044,936 (D).

To determine the future dollar cost of meeting this obligation using a money market hedge, we can use the following steps:

Calculate the yen amount of the accounts payable obligation: ¥1750 million.

Convert the yen amount to dollars using the current spot rate: $14,830,508 ($1 = ¥118).

Calculate the six-month interest rate differential between the US and Japan:

US rate - Japan rate = 6% - 3% = 3% per annum

Calculate the forward discount on the yen:

Forward discount = (Forward rate - Spot rate) / Spot rate

= (¥109/$1 - ¥118/$1) / ¥118/$1

= -7.63%

Calculate the forward exchange rate that will be used to convert dollars to yen in six months:

Forward rate = Spot rate x (1 + Japan rate x time) / (1 + US rate x time)

= ¥118/$1 x (1 + 3% x 0.5) / (1 + 6% x 0.5)

= ¥109/$1

Determine the amount of yen that can be obtained in six months using a money market hedge:

Yen amount = $14,830,508 / ¥109/$1 = ¥161,932,203

Calculate the future dollar cost of meeting the obligation using the money market hedge:

Future dollar cost = Yen amount x Forward rate

= ¥161,932,203 x ¥109/$1

= $15,044,936.

Therefore, the future dollar cost of meeting this obligation using the money market hedge is $15,044,936 ( D).

For more questions like Market click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/13414268

#SPJ11

The answer to the question is CSD must sell approximately 1,611,443 shares of stock.

To calculate the number of shares Caspian Sea Drinks (CSD) must sell, we need to first find the value of each share using the Dividend Discount Model (DDM). The DDM formula is:

Value per share = D1 / (Cost of Equity - Dividend Growth Rate)

Where D1 is the dividend next year ($2.59), the Cost of Equity is 13.18%, and the Dividend Growth Rate is 3.25%.

Step 1: Calculate D1 / (Cost of Equity - Dividend Growth Rate)
Value per share = $2.59 / (0.1318 - 0.0325)

Step 2: Perform the calculation
Value per share = $2.59 / 0.0993 = $26.08

Now that we have the value per share, we can calculate the number of shares CSD must sell to raise $42 million.

Step 3: Calculate the number of shares
Number of shares = Total amount needed / Value per share
Number of shares = $42,000,000 / $26.08

Step 4: Perform the calculation
Number of shares = 1,611,443

CSD must sell approximately 1,611,443 shares of stock to raise the $42 million needed.

To know more about shares refer here:

https://brainly.com/question/28392295#

#SPJ11

(a) The agreement with Randy is legally binding, as Zafiris agreed to pay him a $5,000 bonus for the extra services he voluntarily performed the previous year. This indicates a valid contract where both parties have agreed on the terms and there is consideration (the bonus).

(b) The agreement with Fred is also legally binding, as Zafiris agreed to pay him a $1,000 bonus in exchange for his promise not to breach an existing contract. This shows that both parties have agreed on the terms, and there is valid consideration (Fred's promise not to breach the contract).

(c) Zafiris is not entitled to refuse to perform its contract with Hill solely based on inadequate consideration. A contract is binding if there is a mutual agreement and consideration, regardless of whether the consideration is deemed inadequate or not.

If Zafiris agreed to pay Hill $30,000 pursuant to the contract, it is obligated to fulfill its contractual obligations.

To learn more about agreement, refer below:

https://brainly.com/question/24572146

#SPJ11

The total return (yield) on an investment which involve purchasing a stock for $175 and selling it for $250 as well as a dividend payment of $30 is 60%.

To calculate the total return (yield) on your investment, we will consider the initial stock purchase price, the selling price, and the dividend payment.

In order to calculate the total return, follow these steps:

1. Calculate the capital gain:

Selling price - Purchase price = $250 - $175 = $75.

2. Add the dividend payment:

Capital gain + Dividend = $75 + $30 = $105.

3. Calculate the total return (yield):

(Total gain / Purchase price) x 100 = ($105 / $175) x 100 = 60%.

So, your total return (yield) on this investment was 60%.

Learn more about Capital gain:

https://brainly.com/question/30306965

#SPJ11

The duration of the portfolio is 3.57 years.

To calculate the duration of the portfolio, we can use the following formula:

D = w1D1 + w2D2

where w1 and w2 are the weights of the bond and annuity in the portfolio, and D1 and D2 are the durations of the bond and annuity, respectively.

First, let's calculate the duration of the bond. Since the term structure is flat, the yield to maturity is equal to the current yield of 12%. Using the formula for the duration of a bond, we get:

D1 = (1 + y) * [ (1 - (1 + y)) / y ] - n * [ (1 + y) ]

where y is the annual yield to maturity, n is the number of years to maturity, and D1 is the duration of the bond.

Plugging in the values, we get:

D1 = (1 + 0.12) * [ (1 - (1 + 0.12) / 0.12 ] - 5 * [ (1 + 0.12) ]

= 3.87 years (rounded to 2 decimal places)

Next, let's calculate the duration of the annuity. Since the payments are made at the end of each year, we can use the formula for the duration of an annuity due and subtract 1 to get the duration of the annuity:

D2 = [ (1 + r) * (1 - (1 + r)) / r ] - 1

where r is the discount rate, n is the number of years, and D2 is the duration of the annuity.

Plugging in the values, we get:

D2 = [ (1 + 0.12) * (1 - (1 + 0.12)^(-5)) / 0.12 ] - 1

= 3.37 years (rounded to 2 decimal places)

Finally, we can calculate the duration of the portfolio by weighting the durations of the bond and annuity by their respective weights:

D = 0.46 * 3.87 + 0.54 * 3.37

= 3.57 years (rounded to 2 decimal places)

learn more about Portfolio here:

https://brainly.com/question/17165367

#SPJ11

KiKos is a prime example of how South Korean exporters were affected by the steady appreciation of the South Korean won against the U.S. dollar in the years leading up to 2006, 2007, and into 2008.

Why was this problematic?

This trend was problematic for Korean manufacturers as their sales heavily relied on exports to buyers paying in U.S. dollars. As the dollar continued to weaken, Korean manufacturers were faced with the challenge of dealing with the resulting decrease in Korean won for every dollar received while their costs remained in Korean won. To service these hedging needs, Korean banks began promoting and selling Knock-In Knock-Out option agreements (KiKos). These agreements provided a way for exporters to manage the risks associated with currency fluctuations by setting pre-determined exchange rates, thus providing greater stability and predictability in their transactions.

• KiKos are a type of exotic option that provides a payout when the underlying asset's price reaches a certain level (knock-in) or fails to reach a certain level (knock-out).

• Korean exporters saw KiKos as a way to protect themselves against potential losses due to the strengthening of the Korean won.

• Korean banks sold and promoted KiKos to exporters as a hedging tool, claiming they would provide a cost-effective solution to mitigate exchange rate risks.

• Exporters purchased KiKos from Korean banks, believing they would help them protect their profits and mitigate currency risks.

• However, many exporters did not fully understand the complexities and risks associated with KiKos, as they were complex financial instruments with hidden risks.

• When the global financial crisis hit in 2008, the Korean won rapidly appreciated against the U.S. dollar, causing many KiKos to knock-in and resulting in significant losses for Korean exporters.

• Many Korean exporters suffered financial losses, as they had relied heavily on KiKos as a hedge against exchange rate risks, but the unexpected appreciation of the Korean won resulted in their KiKo options knocking in and causing losses instead of providing the expected protection.

• As a result, many Korean exporters filed lawsuits against Korean banks, claiming that they were misled and deceived into purchasing complex KiKo options without fully understanding the risks involved.

• The case shed light on the need for better regulation and oversight in the sale and promotion of complex financial instruments, and raised questions about the suitability of such products for unsophisticated investors, such as exporters who may not have a deep understanding of financial markets.

• The case also highlighted the importance of understanding and managing foreign exchange risks in international trade, and the need for exporters to carefully evaluate and understand the risks associated with financial instruments before entering into such transactions.

To know more about Korean won visit:

https://brainly.com/question/21408399

#SPJ11

To maintain the delta-hedge for a portfolio of one European call option, you should buy 0.6 shares on Day 1.


The call delta on Day 0 is 0.4, and on Day 1 it's 0.6. The change in delta (∆delta) is 0.6 - 0.4 = 0.2. Since you have written one option, you need to buy 1 × 0.2 = 0.2 shares to maintain the delta-hedge.

However, since the question asks for maintaining the hedge for a portfolio of one option, it means you need to consider the initial 0.4 delta as well. Thus, you should buy 0.4 + 0.2 = 0.6 shares on Day 1.

To maintain the delta-hedge for a portfolio of one European put option, you should sell 7 shares on Day 1.


The put elasticity on Day 0 is -5, and on Day 1 it's -7. The change in elasticity (∆elasticity) is -7 - (-5) = -2. Since you have written one option, you need to sell 1 × 2 = 2 shares to maintain the delta-hedge.

However, since the question asks for maintaining the hedge for a portfolio of one option, it means you need to consider the initial -5 elasticity as well. Thus, you should sell -5 + (-2) = -7 shares on Day 1.

To know more about portfolio click on below link:

https://brainly.com/question/29333981#

#SPJ11

The small-scale movements on stage that an actor performs within the larger pattern of entrances and exits are called a) blocking.

Blocking is the process of planning and rehearsing the movements and positions of actors on stage. It is an essential component of a theatrical production, as it helps to ensure that the actors are positioned correctly for the audience to see and that their movements are coordinated with the larger production.

Blocking also helps to create a visual pattern for the audience to follow, as actors move in and out of the stage area. Managing, producing, and business are all related to theater production but do not refer specifically to the small-scale movements on stage.

Managing may refer to the overall management of a theater company, producing to the process of producing a show, and business to the financial aspects of theater production.So correct answer is option a.

For more questions like Management click the link below:

https://brainly.com/question/11599959

#SPJ11

The opportunity cost of a purchase is: c. the alternative good or service that one sacrifices because a different good was purchased. This term represents the value of the best alternative option that was not chosen when making a decision.

The opportunity cost of a purchase is the alternative good or service that one sacrifices because a different good was purchased. It is the value of the best alternative foregone. It is important to consider opportunity cost when making a decision as it helps to weigh the benefits and drawbacks of different options. It is not always equal to the selling price of what you purchased, the lowest possible price, zero if the item is what you want most, or always greater for people who are out of work than for people who are working.

Option c is correct.

To know more about opportunity cost, visit: https://brainly.com/question/13036997

#SPJ11

True. The cost of a firm's internal common equity is generally higher than the cost of a firm's external common equity due to the issuance costs associated with internal equity, such as the costs of stock option plans, stock purchase plans, and other incentives.

External equity, on the other hand, involves fewer issuance costs since it is generally acquired through public offerings or private placements. The statement is generally true. The cost of a firm's internal common equity, which is the return required by the firm's shareholders on the equity they have invested in the company, is generally higher than the cost of external common equity, which is the return required by new investors in the company's stock. This is because the cost of internal common equity includes not only the cost of the equity capital itself, but also the opportunity cost of retaining earnings rather than distributing them as dividends to shareholders. Additionally, internal common equity may be subject to higher taxes than external equity, further increasing the cost of internal equity financing. On the other hand, external common equity may be subject to issuance costs such as underwriting fees, legal and accounting expenses, and listing fees. However, the magnitude of these costs may vary depending on the size and type of the company and the nature of the external financing used.

Learn more about placements here:

https://brainly.com/question/15714902

#SPJ11

A Liability is defined as a unborn loss of profitable benefits that an reality is needed to give to another reality as a result of once deals or other once events.

Common law liability arises from the legal opinions of judges in deciding a case, a precedent that serves as a companion for other judges to decide future analogous cases and is used in civil action.

On the other hand, legal liability reflects laws legislated at the state or civil position and prescribes certain procedures.

May involve civil or felonious liability. Liability is an obligation or liability to another that's extinguished by the unborn transfer or use of goods, the provision of services or any other profitable sale at a specific or determinable time, upon the circumstance of a specific event or on demand.

To know more about Liability,

brainly.com/question/28391469

#SPJ4

The statement "Companies often separate common equity into more than one class of shares called classified stock to segment the rights to which certain common shareholders are entitled" is true because the use of classified stock to grant different rights and privileges to various classes of shareholders.

Mario Hathaway owns Class A shares with larger-than-proportionate voting rights, which indicates that the company has issued classified shares to provide super voting rights to a certain class of investors.
In the case of Mario Hathaway, who owns Class A shares of Wizard Inc. with larger-than-proportionate voting rights, the statement that is true is: "Classified shares are issued to provide super voting rights to a certain class of investors." This demonstrates the use of classified stock to grant different rights and privileges to various classes of shareholders.

Common shareholders are granted six rights: voting power, ownership, the right to transfer ownership, dividends, the right to inspect corporate documents, and the right to sue for wrongful acts.

If a company liquidates, creditors are the first to have their debts paid from the company's assets.

Learn more about liquidation here: https://brainly.com/question/27814617

#SPJ11

b)$2,000. The insurance company will pay you the market value of the car minus the deductible.

In this case, the market value of the car is $3,000 and the collision deductible is $1,000, so the insurance company will pay you $2,000. This is because the collision deductible is the amount you must pay out of pocket before the insurance company will pay for any damages.

So, if the car is totaled and cannot be repaired, the insurance company will pay you the market value of the car minus the deductible. In this case, the insurance company will pay you $2,000.

Know more about Market value  here

https://brainly.com/question/15148120#

#SPJ11