Answer:
It can only be given to an expert to require a personal appearance before a court.
What are the 3 principles intentional peer support?
Intentional Peer Support offers a powerful paradigm for developing partnerships in which both parties learn and grow together.
Three Fundamental Principles:
1. Growing and learning. We embark on a journey of self-discovery and growth. We learn alongside and from one another. We value and investigate our diverse experiences. We see differences as chances to learn and grow.
2. Concern for the Relationship We cultivate our ability to share and connect. We provide decency and respect. We listen in order to truly hear each other. We seek strategies to remain in a relationship even when we are uncomfortable.
3. Relationships are founded on hope. As humans, we come into contact with one another. We are optimistic and open to new opportunities. Over time, we gain trust. We muster the bravery to try new things as a group.
What exactly is Intention Peer Support?
Intentional Peer Support: An Alternative Approach is a cutting-edge curriculum that investigates how to build mutually supportive relationships. It includes appendices with information for peer support hotlines, peer-run respite programs, and peers working in the mental health system.
For more information about Intention Peer Support refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/27106154
#SPJ4
Why are you reading this?
Failure to comply with the Florida insurance laws may result in your drivers license being suspended for up to how many years
Answer:
Your license can be suspended for up to three years.
Case 3
A single hair was found on the back of a couch. The evidence collector placed it in a paper bindle. He then inserted the paper bindle into a plastic evidence bag. Using tape, the evidence collector sealed the bag. After completing the evidence log and the chain-of-custody form, he brought the evidence bag to the crime lab. What did he do incorrectly?
Answer: When you have hair as evidence, using plastic in any way can damage/tamper with it. He should have put the paper bindle in an envelope instead of the bag.
Explanation:
If a person use their hair as evidence, any use of plastic can tamper with or harm it. He ought to have used an envelope rather than a bag to store the paper bindle.
What is paper bindle?Binder paper is nothing more than a blank sheet of paper folded in a specified manner over a number of steps. Use of paper that is 8 x 12 inches in size is practical. It can also be transported to the crime or accident scene because of its portability.
In modern popular culture, a bindle is portrayed as an object-carrying pole with fabric or a blanket wrapped around one end. Over the shoulder, the complete collection is carried. When gripping larger, heavier objects, in particular, the force was moved to the shoulder, enabling a more stable grip.
For binders: paper Sometimes clean paper that has been folded into a container is included in the packaging for gathering trace evidence.
Thus, If a person use their hair as evidence, any use of plastic can tamper with or harm it.
For more details about paper bindle, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/5616377
#SPJ2
Though high-profile business bankruptcies such as Sports Authority and Radio Shack dominate the news, over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals. T/F
It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.
What is bankruptcy filings?A bankruptcy filings is a procedure that help a person to discard their debt or makes a plan to repay their debts.
Bankrupted Individual debts are wiped out with your filing's court approval which can take a few months or may need continuous payments on those balances throughout the repayment plan.
In conclusion, It is a true statement that over 90% of bankruptcy filings each year are by individuals.
Read more about bankruptcy filing
brainly.com/question/26392690
When can a bill become a law without a presidential signature
QUESTION 38
2 points
Save An
Limits that are placed on the extent and type of campaigning a judicial candidate may or may not engage in or the information
that can be discussed in a judicial campaign can be a disadvantage to electing a judge for office
A)True
B)False
As a first responder, you don't have much control over the lamp color or the type of light on your response vehicles — those decisions are made by the state and by _________ administrators.
The decisions about lamp color or the type of light on your response vehicles are made by the state and traffic incident management (TIM) administrators.
What is traffic incident management (TIM)?Traffic incident management (TIM) can be defined as a multi-disciplinary process that involves planning and coordinating vehicles and road users (pedestrians), so as to efficiently and effectively detect, respond and clear any traffic incident on the road.
The main purpose of the traffic incident management (TIM) is to ensure and safely restore continuous traffic flow as quickly as possible and to make decisions about lamp color or the type of light on a responder's vehicle.
Read more on traffic flow here: https://brainly.com/question/24555108
Select the true statement about the relationship between law, ethics, and business.
to deny human rights is to challenge their very humanity discuss
should ignore it and if they do it again do the right to hit .
Explanation:
bc that's rude .
Whats the difference between a federal judge and a supreme court justice
The federal judge perform legal duties at Federal district court while the supreme court justice perform legal duties at U.S. Supreme Court
Who are the Federal judges?
These are justices that serve in a federal court and can only be impeached by House of Representatives.
Who are the Supreme Court Justices?These Justices are part of the nine justices of the U.S. Supreme Court that were nominated by the President and confirmed by the U.S. Senate.
Read more about Federal judges
brainly.com/question/1622017
why do community report the crime instead of taking it in their own hands
Answer:
Communities will perhaps rather report a crime instead of "taking things into their own hands," because they want to avoid conflict or may have no true interest in what they're reporting.
Explanation:
^
Answer:
the community report the crimes because of the principle of rule of law which states the supremacy and it means that no one can take it into their own hands
List the advantages of unit management for staff members
Answer: Unit management enhances communication between staff and inmates, maintains regularity for employees and inmates alike, empowers decision-making at the front-line level, and increases direct supervision and monitoring of offenders.
Explanation: ye
Nora is a criminology student. she is tasked with explaining how society responds to an increase in crime. what theory is nora most likely focusing on?
a.
social pathology
b.
strain theory
c.
differential opportunity theory
d.
critical theory
Answer:
D. Critical Theory.
Explanation:
The theory which Nora is most likely focusing on is Critical Theory.
Answer:
critical theory
Explanation:
a philosophical approach to culture, and especially to literature, that seeks to confront the social, historical, and ideological forces and structures that produce and constrain it. The term is applied particularly to the work of the Frankfurt School.
What issues forced the delegates to the constitutional convention to compromise? select two correct answers
Do you think society asks much of thecriminal court? explain your answer
Answer:
According to The Opportunity Agenda's new Opportunity Survey, 69 percent of the public thinks the criminal justice system is “not good.” Although a slight majority thinks society would be better served by “stricter punishment for people convicted of crimes."
Explanation:
What powers does the supreme court have in choosing cases
Answer:
interpret the meaning of a law, to decide whether a law is relevant to a particular set of facts, or to rule on how a law should be applied.
The power that supreme court have are to determine whether a law applies to a certain set of facts or to make a decision on how a law should be implemented.
What are the main functions of the Supreme Court?The Supreme Court's principal responsibility is to ensure independent, open, fair, and efficient dispute resolution in conformity with the federal and state constitutions and laws.
The Supreme Court hears cases in a variety of ways: A party who has lost a case before the Court of Appeals can ask for a review of the decision.
Thus, supreme court have powers like evaluating the law and the application of different laws.
For further information about the supreme court, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12603347
#SPJ4
Which step of the policy evaluation process would ask you to determine if a policy helps to ensure domestic tranquility?
a) identify the solution
b) assign value
c) identify ideals expressed
d) identify impacts
e) identify the problem
Answer:
E. Identity the problem.
Explanation:
To ensure domestic tranquility , one must identity the problem to process with.
Identifying the problem is the step of the policy evaluation process that would ask you to determine if a policy helps to ensure domestic tranquillity. Thus, option 'E' is the correct option.
What is the policy evaluation process?The logical procedure utilized to ascertain the discrepancy between what was conceived by the initial policy aims and what has actually been realized by the policy or program as executed forms the foundation for most models of policy assessment.
However, many other models concentrate their analysis on various goals, such as what the evaluation's true purpose is, what the evaluator's role in the process is, how broad or narrow the evaluation's scope should be, and how the evaluation should be organized and carried out, for instance, what measurement tools should be used to determine success or failure.
Types of Policy Evaluation: Process Evaluation
Analyze the reasons for a program or policy's present performance.Determine any issues.Create remedies for the issues.Enhance program performance by offering suggestions for how solutions should be put into practice and assessed afterwards.Learn more about the policy evaluation process, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28024313
#SPJ2
The problem with labeling a whole group or race of people as predisposed to crime is that the majority are not criminals. The very fact that not all men with crooked noses became criminals would seem to disprove Lombroso’s theories outright. How did Konrad Lorenz attempt to explain the good behavior of some who Darwin taught were ‘less evolved’?
He said that when put in difficult circumstances, these inborn instincts would come out.
He said that those who came from less evolved races had no choice but to commit crime.
He said that by mixing the races, the crime rates would diminish.
He said that those who did not commit crime were evolving past their genetics.
Answer:
He said that those who came from less evolved races had no choice but to commit crime.
Explanation:
He claimed that these ingrained tendencies would manifest themselves under trying conditions. As a result, Option (A) is the right alternative.
Who is Konrad Lorenz?Konrad Zacharias Lorenz was an ornithologist, zoologist, and ethologist from Austria. Together with Nikolaas Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch, he was awarded the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. He is frequently credited with helping to establish modern ethology or the study of animal behavior.
The nature of instinctual behavioral acts, in particular how such acts arise and the supply of neural energy for their performance, were the subject of Lorenz's early scientific contributions. He also looked into how a simultaneous activation of two or more animals' basic urges could result in behavior.
Hence, Option (A) is the right one.
Learn more about Konrad Lorenz, from:
brainly.com/question/6834123
#SPJ5
You wake up at the apartments, walk out of the apartments and are held up at gunpoint by someone you don't know, what do you do?
I'm hoping that this is an open-ended or critical thinking question. If not, do not take this answer as critical thinking is what I'm getting at.
If I were to be held at gunpoint by someone I don't know after leaving an apartment, this is how I would react. First of all, I would remain calm and follow the instructions of whomever is harboring the gun. Then, I would survey my surroundings before anything proceeds; for example, if I am at an apartment, I would see if there were any people or cars nearby that I could signal to if I had a chance to catch this stranger off guard. Assuming I am alone, I would continue to follow all instructions and give the impression I will conform early on to increase my chances of getting away later on. I would try to get somewhere public if I could or use my cell or a nearby phone to call 911 if this person were to say, go to the restroom for 2 minutes, or something similar. If all else fails and I believe I am doomed to escape, I would make sure to do what I could that would end up prosecuting this person in the future. For example, I would try to hide my ID in the place so the police would know this is where I was killed or leave some trace of my DNA on the stranger or their belongings.
If I got up at the apartments and on my way out, I found myself at a gun point I would first try to remain calm myself and then try to taser him if that’s not possible contact 911 as early as possible by sneaking on my capturer. And will try to gain on his trust that I will be cooperative until cops arrive or else, I will try to find something to attack my capturer.
What must be your initial actions to be safe?Remain calmTry to have your IDs with you Call 911Cooperate with him Give him what he asks for, if that’s no very valuable to youWhat is a taser?Taser, short for Tom A. Swift Electric Rifle, is a handheld device that sends a 50,000-volt electric shock to incapacitate a person. The Taser fires two small darts that are connected to the gadget by thin cables and can travel up to 11 meters (35 feet). The darts can pierce clothing and deliver an electric shock to the victim once they make contact, disrupting the target's nervous system and causing temporary incapacitation. Because the Taser employs pressurized nitrogen to discharge the darts, it is not considered a firearm. A Taser can also be used as a stun gun by putting it on the target's body and inflicting an electric shock.
to know more about taser here,
https://brainly.com/question/27651583
#SPJ2
A measurable obligation arising from agreements, contracts, or laws is called a.
Answer:
known
Explanation:
A measurable obligation arising from agreements, contracts, or laws is called a known liability
2.) How do aggravated assault and aggravated battery differ from simple assault and battery?
Answer:
Aggravated assault is a more serious type of misdemeanor resulting in possibly higher fines and longer jail sentences.
Simple battery will generally be a serious misdemeanor resulting in higher fines and longer jail sentences.
Aggravated battery is when there’s great bodily harm and, in most cases, will be considered a felony.
Explanation:
Why was the bill of rights written after the us constitution
Expain how a group of four, each with a different winning color, could work together
Answer:
They could put all of their colors together.
Which courts are tribunals created by congress to handle specialized types of cases?
Answer:
Article one courts are tribunals created by the Congress to handle specialized types of cases, especially those that rise under the regulatory law of federal agencies. The decisions of Article one courts are generally reviewable in Article three courts.
Explanation:quizlet
Article one courts are tribunals established by Congress to handle certain sorts of matters, particularly those arising under federal agency regulation law. Article one court decisions are often reviewable in Article three courts.
What exactly are constitutional courts?A constitutional court is a high court that focuses on constitutional law. Its primary authority is to determine whether challenged laws are in fact unconstitutional, i.e. whether they violate constitutionally established norms, privileges, and freedoms, among other things.
For more information about constitutional courts refer to the link:https://brainly.com/question/1822517
#SPJ4
You are driving your vehicle and you see this traffic sign, one lane bridge. this means the bridge ahead is wide enough for only one vehicle at a time
Answer:
wait till someone else to go and if there is no light wait till it is clear with no clear...
One Lane Bridge is a signpost which determines that vehicles travelling in one direction have to give way to another vehicle coming from the opposite direction at bridges.
What are One Lane Bridge Signpost?While travelling on one lane bridge one must see the signpost installed on the road. The Signpost is made of diamond shape and round shape warning which determines that one lane bridge ahead and another displaying that the vehicle moving in particular direction should give way to the another vehicle approaching from another direction.
Thus while approaching the bridge, the driver has to be cautious, look for the approaching of other vehicle and then start moving towards the bridge.
What are Signpost?A signpost is a sign installed at the side of road which determines different factors which the driver should adhered to while driving.
A signpost provides different information related to road sense and vital information as in about School ahead , Hospital approaching and also different signs showing curve ahead, speed limit, men at work and construction sites.
These signposts are important as it helps in making driver cautious and informative about road sense and helps in ensuring precautions and protections and instilling road sense.
To learn more about One Lane Bridge Signpost here
https://brainly.com/question/17580955
#SPJ3
which province has customary law in South Africa
Answer:
It is used by indigenious communities.
Explanation:
Are there exceptions to the rule that a defendant has a right to counsel at a lineup
Explanation:
There are no exceptions to the 6th amendment, that right can not be taken away from you no matter the circumstance, there are however, limitations. such as what an attorney may do for their defendants.
Jack and Jill Forensics Style
Answer the following questions based on information in the Crime Scene S.P.O.T.
1. Identify several key pieces of evidence within the story. How were they useful to investigators?
2. What evidence in the story is class evidence and what evidence is individual? Explain.
3. How can Locard's exchange principle help investigate in this case?
4. Choose a fairy tale or nursery rhyme story as the basis for your own forensic story. Be sure to include details about evidence. In 5-7 sentences, choose 1 popular fairytale (give the title and state the evidence etc…)
I add the information!!!
The several key pieces of evidence within the story are:
The crushed grass.The boulder with blood.The red sweater matched the one found in Jill's room.These were useful to investigators because they helped them to reconstruct the crime scene, understand the motive and nab the killer.
The class evidence in this story is the pail atop the hill and the individual evidence was the red sweater.
What is Forensics?This refers to the scientific tests which are carried out usually at a crime scene to get more information about the nature of the crime and the perpetrator(s).
Read more about crime scenes here:
https://brainly.com/question/19238665
4. How are interviews and interrogations distinguished from each other?
Answer:
The goal of an interview is usually to get a job and have very reasonable and formal questions about one's expertise, such as why should we let you in on this job or what is your level of experience in this area of expertise. However, it can also be to film a documentary or get to know somebody better, and both are conducted by people who have interviewed people many times. Interrogations are also formal and performed by experts, but they are usually strict and operated as a punishment or asking questions with the consequence of a penalty if answered suspiciously or incorrectly.