Step 1: The standard deviation of ^p is approximately 0.0159.
Step 2: If the sample size were 6000 rather than 1500, the standard deviation of ^p would be approximately 0.0079.
In statistics, standard deviation is a measure of the amount of variability or dispersion of a set of data values. In survey sampling, the standard deviation of ^p, the proportion of individuals in a sample who possess a particular characteristic of interest, is given by the formula sqrt((p*(1-p))/n), where p is the population proportion and n is the sample size.
In this scenario, the population proportion is assumed to be 0.9 based on the information provided. Thus, the standard deviation of ^p for a sample size of 1500 is sqrt((0.9*(1-0.9))/1500) = 0.0159. Similarly, for a sample size of 6000, the standard deviation of ^p would be sqrt((0.9*(1-0.9))/6000) = 0.0079.
These results suggest that larger sample sizes tend to produce more precise estimates of the population proportion. This is because as the sample size increases, the standard deviation of ^p decreases, indicating that the estimate is more likely to be closer to the true population value. Therefore, it is generally recommended to use larger sample sizes in survey sampling whenever possible.
Learn more about standard deviation, here:
brainly.com/question/475676
#SPJ11
Find the area of the region cut from the plane 4x + y + 8z = 2 by the cylinder whose walls are x = y^2 and x = 8 - y^2. The area of the surface is.
we obtain the integral ∫[0,√(8)] ∫[0,√(x)] (√(64x^2 + 1))/8 dx dy,
To find the area of the region cut from the plane 4x + y + 8z = 2 by the cylinder whose walls are x = y^2 and x = 8 - y^2, we need to first find the intersection of the plane and the cylinder.
We can solve for y in terms of x from the equations x = y^2 and x = 8 - y^2 to get y = ±√(x) and then substitute this into the equation for the plane to get 4x ± √(x) + 8z = 2. Solving for z in terms of x and y, we get z = (1/8)(1 - 4x ± √(x)).
To find the area of the surface, we need to integrate the magnitude of the cross product of the partial derivatives of z with respect to x and y over the region of intersection.
That is, we need to evaluate the integral ∫∫(√(1 + (∂z/∂x)^2 + (∂z/∂y)^2)) dA over the region, where dA is the area element. Since the region is symmetric about the xz-plane, we can integrate over the part where y is non-negative and then double the result.
Using the equation for z, we can calculate the partial derivatives ∂z/∂x and ∂z/∂y, and then substitute these into the integrand. After some algebraic manipulation and simplification,
we obtain the integral ∫[0,√(8)] ∫[0,√(x)] (√(64x^2 + 1))/8 dx dy, which can be evaluated numerically using standard integration techniques to get the area of the surface.
To know more about area click here
brainly.com/question/13194650
#SPJ11
if you selected four of these stocks at random, what is the probability that your selection included ko and vz but excluded pfe and ge?
The probability of selecting ko and vz but excluding pfe and ge from a set of 8 stocks is 0.0625 or 6.25%.
To see why, we can use the formula for the probability of an event occurring, which is:
P(event) = (number of ways the event can occur) / (total number of possible outcomes)
The total number of possible outcomes when selecting 4 stocks from a set of 8 is:
C(8,4) = 8! / (4! * 4!) = 70
where C(n,r) is the number of combinations of r objects chosen from a set of n objects.
To count the number of ways to select ko and vz while excluding pfe and ge, we need to choose 2 stocks out of the remaining 4, which can be done in:
C(4,2) = 4! / (2! * 2!) = 6
ways.
Therefore, the probability of selecting ko and vz but excluding pfe and ge is:
P(ko and vz but not pfe or ge) = 6 / 70 = 0.0625 or 6.25%.
In summary, the probability of selecting ko and vz but excluding pfe and ge from a set of 8 stocks is 0.0625 or 6.25%, which can be calculated using the formula for probability and the number of possible outcomes that satisfy the given conditions.
To learn more about probability : brainly.com/question/32117953
#SPJ11
complete question:
If you selected four of these stocks at random, what is the probability that your selection included KO and VZ but excluded PFE and GE?
in how many ways 7 people be seated at around a table if; a) they can sit anywhere, b) two particular people must not sit next to each other?
Answer:
I’d say the two people that can’t sit next to each other but to choose a different seat, if they find themselves seated next to each other they could ask someone next to them to switch seats with them. The 7 people can sit anywhere but the 2 particular people could sit away from the other.
Step-by-step explanation:
I hope I helped! ^.^’
at a fair, you have the following game: you pay $1 and a coin is flipped. if it is heads, you are paid $3; if it is tails, you are paid $0.
The game's outcomes can vary quite a bit from the expected value, and you could win more or less than $1.50 in any game.
The expected value is calculated as the sum of the product of each possible outcome and its . In this game, the possible outcomes are $3 and $0, and the probability of each outcome is 1/2 (assuming a fair coin). Therefore, the expected value of the game is:
Expected value = ($3 x 1/2) + ($0 x 1/2) = $1.50
This means that if you played the game many times, you could expect to win an average of $1.50 per game.
The variance of the game is a measure of how much the outcomes vary from the expected value. It is calculated as the sum of the squared difference between each outcome and the expected value, weighted by their respective probabilities. In this game, the variance is:
Variance = [(($3 - $1.50)^2 x 1/2) + (($0 - $1.50)^2 x 1/2)] = $2.25
This means that the outcomes of the game can vary quite a bit from the expected value, and you could win more or less than $1.50 in any given game.
To learn more about probability click here
brainly.com/question/30034780
#SPJ11
Part A
Consider functions m and n: n(x)=1/4x^2-2x+4
The value of m(n(2)) is __
The value of n(m(1)) is __
Part B
Consider the functions m and n
n(x)=1/4x^2-2x+4
What is the value of n(m(4))
A. -4
B. -2
C. 0
D. 4
Part C
Given your answers to Katy’s A and B, do you think functions m and n are inverse functions? Explain your reasoning
Part A:
To find the value of m(n(2)), we need to first find the value of n(2) and then use that value to find m.
n(2) = 1/4(2)^2 - 2(2) + 4
= 1/4(4) - 4 + 4
= 1 - 4 + 4
= 1
So, n(2) = 1.
Now, we can find m(1) using the equation for m:
m(1) = 3 - 2(1) + 4
= 5
Therefore, m(n(2)) = m(1) = 5.
To find the value of n(m(1)), we need to first find the value of m(1) and then use that value to find n.
m(1) = 3 - 2(1) + 4
= 5
So, m(1) = 5.
Now, we can find n(5) using the equation for n:
n(5) = 1/4(5)^2 - 2(5) + 4
= 1/4(25) - 10 + 4
= 6.25 - 10 + 4
= 0.25
Therefore, n(m(1)) = n(5) = 0.25.
Part B:
To find the value of n(m(4)), we need to first find the value of m(4) and then use that value to find n.
m(4) = 3 - 2(4) + 4
= -1
So, m(4) = -1.
Now, we can find n(-1) using the equation for n:
n(-1) = 1/4(-1)^2 - 2(-1) + 4
= 1/4(1) + 2 + 4
= 1.25 + 2 + 4
= 7.25
Therefore, n(m(4)) = n(-1) = 7.25.
The answer is not one of the options provided.
Part C:
The functions m and n are inverse functions if and only if applying them in either order gives the identity function, i.e., m(n(x)) = x and n(m(x)) = x for all x in the domain of the functions.
From our calculations in Part A, we know that m(n(2)) = 5 and n(m(1)) = 0.25, which means that m(n(x)) ≠ x and n(m(x)) ≠ x for some values of x in the domain of the functions. Therefore, we can conclude that functions m and n are not inverse functions.
describe a line, segment, or ray that bisects a segment at a right angle
A terminology that is described as a line, segment, or ray that bisects a segment at a right angle include the following: B. Perpendicular bisector.
What is a perpendicular bisector?In Mathematics and Geometry, a perpendicular bisector simply refers to a line, segment, or ray that bisects or divides a line segment exactly into two (2) equal halves and forms an angle that has a magnitude of 90 degrees at the point of intersection.
This ultimately implies that, a perpendicular bisector can be used to bisects or divides a line segment exactly into two (2) equal halves, in order to forms a right angle with an angle that has a magnitude of 90 degrees at the point of intersection.
Read more on perpendicular bisectors here: brainly.com/question/19154899
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Which of the following is described as a line, segment, or ray that bisects a segment at a right angle?
A. Slope
B. Perpendicular bisector
C. Midpoint
D. Angle bisector
Which residual plot would you examine to determine whether the assumption of constant error variance is satisfied for a model with tut, independent variables x; and x2? a. Plot the residuals against the independent variable x2 b. Plot the residuals against the independent variable x1 c. Plot the residuals against predicted values y d. Plot the residuals against observed y values.
To determine whether the assumption of constant error variance is satisfied for a model with tut, independent variables x, and x₂, you would examine the residual plot where the residuals are plotted against predicted values y.
This plot is also known as the plot of residuals versus fitted values. In this plot, if the residuals are randomly scattered around the horizontal line of zero, then the assumption of constant error variance is satisfied. However, if there is a pattern in the residuals, such as a funnel shape or a curve, then the assumption of constant error variance may not be met. It is important to ensure that the assumption of constant error variance is met, as violation of this assumption can lead to biased and inefficient estimates of the model parameters. Additionally, it can affect the reliability of statistical inferences and lead to incorrect conclusions.
In summary, to determine whether the assumption of constant error variance is satisfied for a model with tut, independent variables x, and x₂, you would examine the residual plot where the residuals are plotted against predicted values y. It is important to check this assumption to ensure the validity of the model and the accuracy of the results.This plot allows you to assess the variance of the residuals and identify any patterns, which could indicate that the assumption of constant error variance may not be met. If the plot shows no discernible pattern and the spread of residuals appears to be uniform across the range of predicted values, the assumption of constant error variance is likely satisfied.
Learn more about independent variables here:
https://brainly.com/question/17034410
#SPJ11
find the critical points of ()=−64 42−4 and apply the second derivative test (if possible) to determine whether each of them corresponds to a local minimum or maximum.
The second derivative is negative at x = 0.408, we know that this critical point corresponds to a local maximum.
Calculus uses the second derivative test as a technique to identify a function's concavity and local extrema. It entails taking a function's second derivative and checking the sign at a crucial point. A local minimum or maximum is indicated by a positive second derivative and the opposite is true for a negative second derivative.
To find the critical points of the function[tex]f(x) = -64x^4 + 42x - 4[/tex], we need to find where the derivative of the function is equal to zero or undefined. Taking the derivative of f(x) gives us:
[tex]f'(x) = -256x^3 + 42[/tex]
Setting[tex]f'(x) = 0[/tex], we can solve for x:
[tex]-256x^3 + 42 = 0\\x^3 = 42/256\\x = (42/256)^(1/3) = 0.408[/tex]
So the only critical point of the function is x = 0.408.
To apply the second derivative test, we need to take the second derivative of f'(x):
[tex]f''(x) = -768x^2[/tex]
Plugging in our critical point x = 0.408, we get:
[tex]f''(0.408) = -768(0.408)^2 = -125.3[/tex]
Since the second derivative is negative at x = 0.408, we know that this critical point corresponds to a local maximum.
Learn more about second derivative here:
https://brainly.com/question/13449537
#SPJ11
8.13 let w have a u (π, 2π) distribution. what is larger: e [sin(w )] or sin(e[w])? check your answer by computing these two numbers.
The value of the expression is sin(E[w]) = -1 is larger than E[sin(w)] = 2/π.
We need to find whether E[sin(w)] or sin(E[w]) is larger.
Using Jensen's inequality, which states that for a convex function g, E[g(x)] >= g(E[x]), we can say:
E[sin(w)] = ∫ sin(w) * f(w) dw
Where f(w) is the probability density function of w
Taking g(x) = sin(x), which is a concave function, and using Jensen's inequality, we can say:
sin(E[w]) >= E[sin(w)]
Therefore, sin(E[w]) is larger than E[sin(w)].
Now, let's compute these two numbers:
E[sin(w)] = ∫ sin(w) * f(w) dw = ∫ sin(w) * 1/(2π - π) dw = 1/π * [(-cos(w))]π 2π = (cos(π) - cos(2π))/π = 2/π
sin(E[w]) = sin(E[w]) = sin(3π/2) = -1
Therefore, sin(E[w]) = -1 is larger than E[sin(w)] = 2/π.
Learn more about expression here
https://brainly.com/question/1859113
#SPJ11
Find the area under the graph of the function over the interval given. f(x)= e' [-2,2] The area is (Type an exact answer in terms of e.)
The area under the graph of the function f(x) = e^x over the interval [-2, 2] is approximately 13.77 square units.
To calculate the area under the graph of the function, we can use integration. In this case, we need to integrate the function f(x) = e^x with respect to x over the interval [-2, 2].
The definite integral represents the area under the curve between the given limits.
∫[a,b] e^x dx
Applying the integral, we have: ∫[-2,2] e^x dx
Using the rules of integration, we can evaluate this integral to find the area under the curve.
The antiderivative of e^x is e^x itself. Evaluating the integral at the upper and lower limits, we get: [e^x] from -2 to 2
Plugging in the values, we have: e^2 - e^(-2)
This is the exact answer in terms of e. To get the numerical approximation, you can substitute the value of e into the expression to get the approximate area.
To know more about area click here
brainly.com/question/13194650
#SPJ11
find the distance between u= 0 −6 3 and z= −2 −1 8 .
The distance between the points u= 0 −6 3 and z= −2 −1 8 is approximately 9.95 units.
To calculate the distance between two points in three-dimensional space, we can use the distance formula, which is derived from the Pythagorean theorem. The distance formula states that the distance between two points (x1, y1, z1) and (x2, y2, z2) is equal to the square root of [(x2 - x1)^2 + (y2 - y1)^2 + (z2 - z1)^2].
Using this formula, we can find the distance between u and z as follows:
d = sqrt[(-2 - 0)^2 + (-1 - (-6))^2 + (8 - 3)^2]
= sqrt[4 + 25 + 25]
= sqrt(54)
≈ 9.95
Therefore, the distance between the points u and z is approximately 9.95 units.
Learn more about Distance:
brainly.com/question/15172156
#SPJ11
Find the period, phase shift, vertical shift, reflection, and increment. Sketch the graph.
1) y= -2cos (x+pi/2)
2) y= 1/2sin 2(x-pi/4)
3) y= -1/2sin (x+pi/2)-1
For the graph: y= -2cos (x+π/2)
period: 2π
phase shift: 0
Vertical shift: - 2
Reflection about x axis.
For the graph: y= 1/2sin 2(x-π/4)
period: π
phase shift: 0
Vertical shift:
No any reflection.
For the graph: y= -1/2sin (x+π/2)-1
period: 2π
phase shift: 0
Vertical shift: -1
Reflection about x axis.
(1) For the given function,
Since the period of y = -2cos(x) is 2π,
So the period of y = -2cos(x + pi/2) is also 2π
To find the phase shift.
The phase shift of y = -2cos(x) is π/2,
so the phase shift of y = -2cos(x + π/2) is 0.
The vertical shift is -2, and there is a reflection about the x-axis.
(2) For the given function,
y= 1/2sin 2(x-π/4)
Since the period of y = 1/2sin(x) is 2π,
so the period of y = 1/2sin(2x) is π.
The phase shift of y = 1/2sin(x) is π/4,
so the phase shift of y = 1/2sin(2x - π/4) is 0.
There is no vertical shift, and there is no reflection.
(3) For the given function,
y= -1/2sin (x+π/2)-1
Since the period of y = -1/2sin(x) is 2π,
so the period of y = -1/2sin(x + π/2) is also 2π.
The phase shift of y = -1/2sin(x) is -π/2,
so the phase shift of y = -1/2sin(x + π/2) is 0.
The vertical shift is -1, and there is a reflection about the x-axis.
To learn more about function visit:
https://brainly.com/question/8892191
#SPJ1
find the pdf of e−x for x ∼ expo(1)
Therefore, The pdf of e^(−x) for x ∼ expo(1) is f(x) = e^(−x) for x ≥ 0. The pdf is a decreasing function that approaches zero as x increases.
The probability density function (pdf) of an exponential distribution with parameter λ is f(x) = λe^(−λx) for x ≥ 0. In this case, λ = 1, so the pdf of e^(−x) for x ∼ expo(1) is f(x) = e^(−x) for x ≥ 0. This means that the probability of observing a value of e^(−x) between a and b is given by the integral of e^(−x) from a to b, which is equal to e^(−a) − e^(−b). The graph of this pdf shows that it is a decreasing function that approaches zero as x increases.
Therefore, The pdf of e^(−x) for x ∼ expo(1) is f(x) = e^(−x) for x ≥ 0. The pdf is a decreasing function that approaches zero as x increases.
To know more about probability visit :
https://brainly.com/question/13604758
#SPJ11
8. the solution of the initial-value problem x'= (-1 1)x, x(0) = (-2, 5)
the solution to the initial-value problem is:
x(t) = (-4.5e^(-t) + 2.5e^(t), 5e^(t)).
To solve the initial-value problem x' = (-1 1)x, x(0) = (-2, 5), we can use the matrix exponential method.
First, we find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the coefficient matrix (-1 1):
| -1 1 |
| | = (λ + 1)(λ - 1) = 0
| 0 -1|
The eigenvalues are λ = -1 and λ = 1.
For λ = -1, we have:
| 0 1 |
| | v = 0
| 0 0 |
This gives us the eigenvector v1 = (1, 0).
For λ = 1, we have:
| -2 1 |
| | v = 0
| 0 0 |
This gives us the eigenvector v2 = (1, 2).
We can then write the general solution as:
x(t) = c1 * e^(-t) * v1 + c2 * e^(t) * v2
where c1 and c2 are constants to be determined from the initial condition x(0) = (-2, 5).
Substituting t = 0 and equating coefficients, we get:
x(0) = c1 * v1 + c2 * v2
(-2, 5) = c1 * (1, 0) + c2 * (1, 2)
-2 = c1 + c2
5 = 2c2
Solving for c1 and c2, we get:
c1 = -2 - c2 = -2 - (5/2) = -9/2
c2 = 5/2
Therefore, the solution to the initial-value problem is:
x(t) = (-9/2) * e^(-t) * (1, 0) + (5/2) * e^(t) * (1, 2)
Simplifying this expression, we get:
x(t) = (-9/2) * (e^(-t), 0) + (5/2) * (e^(t), 2e^(t))
= (-4.5e^(-t) + 2.5e^(t), 5e^(t))
So the solution is x(t) = (-4.5e^(-t) + 2.5e^(t), 5e^(t)).
Visit to know more about Initial value problem:-
brainly.com/question/31041139
#SPJ11
ANOVA F-statistic is defined as the Within Group Variation divided by the Between Group Variation. True False
False. The ANOVA F-statistic is defined as the Between Group Variation divided by the Within Group Variation.
In Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), we compare the variation between different groups (the Between Group Variation) to the variation within each group (the Within Group Variation). The F-statistic is the ratio of the Between Group Variation to the Within Group Variation.
The F-statistic is used to test the null hypothesis that the means of the different groups are equal. If the F-statistic is large and the associated p-value is small, we reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is evidence of a difference between the means of the groups.
On the other hand, if the F-statistic is small and the associated p-value is large, we fail to reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is not enough evidence to conclude that the means of the groups are different.
Learn more about ANOVA F-statistic here: brainly.com/question/31809956.
#SPJ11
thirty-six students took an exam on which the average was 76 and the standard deviation was 5 . the instructor announces that the distribution is not bell-shaped. what proportion of the students scored within 3 standard deviations of the mean?
A symmetric distribution the proportion of students who scored within 3 standard deviations of the mean is approximately 68% or more.
The proportion of students who scored within 3 standard deviations of the mean, we need to use the empirical rule, also known as the 68-95-99.7 rule. However, since the distribution is stated to be not bell-shaped, we cannot strictly rely on this rule. Nonetheless, we can make an approximation assuming the distribution is roughly symmetric.
According to the empirical rule, for a bell-shaped distribution, approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean, about 95% falls within two standard deviations, and roughly 99.7% falls within three standard deviations.
The average score is 76, and the standard deviation is 5. So, within three standard deviations of the mean, we have:
Lower limit = mean - 3 * standard deviation
Upper limit = mean + 3 * standard deviation
Lower limit = 76 - 3 * 5 = 76 - 15 = 61
Upper limit = 76 + 3 * 5 = 76 + 15 = 91
Therefore, we can approximate that the proportion of students who scored within 3 standard deviations of the mean is roughly the proportion of students who scored between 61 and 91.
Since the distribution is not specified further, we cannot determine the exact proportion. However, we can approximate it by assuming a symmetric distribution. Therefore, the proportion of students who scored within 3 standard deviations of the mean is approximately 68% or more.
To find the proportion of students who scored within 3 standard deviations of the mean, we need to use the empirical rule, also known as the 68-95-99.7 rule. However, since the distribution is stated to be not bell-shaped, we cannot strictly rely on this rule. Nonetheless, we can make an approximation assuming the distribution is roughly symmetric.
According to the empirical rule, for a bell-shaped distribution, approximately 68% of the data falls within one standard deviation of the mean, about 95% falls within two standard deviations, and roughly 99.7% falls within three standard deviations.
In this case, the average score is 76, and the standard deviation is 5. So, within three standard deviations of the mean, we have:
Lower limit = mean - 3 ×standard deviation
Upper limit = mean + 3 × standard deviation
Lower limit = 76 - 3 × 5 = 76 - 15 = 61
Upper limit = 76 + 3 × 5 = 76 + 15 = 91
Therefore, we can approximate that the proportion of students who scored within 3 standard deviations of the mean is roughly the proportion of students who scored between 61 and 91.
Since the distribution is not specified further, we cannot determine the exact proportion. However, we can approximate it by assuming a symmetric distribution. Therefore, the proportion of students who scored within 3 standard deviations of the mean is approximately 68% .
To know more about distribution here
https://brainly.com/question/13498201
#SPJ4
Find the work done by the force field F(x,y,z)=6xi+6yj+2k on a particle that moves along the helix r(t)=2cos(t)i+2sin(t)j+5tk,0≤t≤2π
The work done by the force field on the particle moving along the given helix is 60π units of work.
How to find work done?To find the work done by the force field F on the particle that moves along the helix r, we use the formula:
W = ∫ F · dr
where · denotes the dot product, and dr is the differential displacement vector along the path of the particle.
First, we need to calculate dr. Since the particle moves along the helix r, we can write:
dr = dx i + dy j + dz k
where dx, dy, and dz are the differentials of x, y, and z with respect to t, respectively. We have:
dx = -2sin(t) dt
dy = 2cos(t) dt
dz = 5 dt
Therefore, we can write:
dr = (-2sin(t) i + 2cos(t) j + 5k) dt
Next, we need to calculate F · dr. We have:
F · dr = (6x i + 6y j + 2k) · (-2sin(t) i + 2cos(t) j + 5k) dt
= -12sin(t) + 12cos(t) + 10 dt
Finally, we can integrate F · dr over the interval 0 ≤ t ≤ 2π to obtain the work done by the force field F on the particle that moves along the helix r:
W = ∫ F · dr = ∫ (-12sin(t) + 12cos(t) + 10) dt
= [-12cos(t) + 12sin(t) + 10t]0[tex]^(2π)[/tex]
= (-12cos(2π) + 12sin(2π) + 10(2π)) - (-12cos(0) + 12sin(0) + 10(0))
= 20π
Therefore, the work done by the force field F on the particle that moves along the helix r is 20π.
Learn more about work
brainly.com/question/18094932
#SPJ11
bill can drive from springfield to teton at a certain rate of speed in 6 hours. if he increase his speed by 20mph he can make the trip in 4 hours. how far is it from springfield to teton
Let's denote the distance from Springfield to Teton as "D" and Bill's original rate of speed as "R" (in miles per hour). We know that at his original speed, he can travel from Springfield to Teton in 6 hours.
So, we can express this relationship as: D = R x6. Now, when Bill increases his speed by 20 mph, he can make the trip in 4 hours. So, we can express this new relationship as: D = (R + 20) x 4. Since both equations represent the distance from Springfield to Teton, we can set them equal to each other: Rx6 = (R + 20) x4 . Now, let's solve for R:
6R = 4R + 80
2R = 80
R = 40 mph
Now that we know Bill's original rate of speed, we can calculate the distance from Springfield to Teton using either equation. Let's use the first one:
D = R x6
D = 40 x 6
D = 240 miles
So, the distance from Springfield to Teton is 240 miles.
learn more about distance here :
https://brainly.com/question/29132081
#SPJ11
. jack has a piece of rope that is 7.5 meters long. he gives his sister a 150 cm piece. he cuts the remaining piece into 10 equal sections. how long is each section?
Jack has a 7.5 meter (750 cm) rope, gives his sister a 150 cm piece, and cuts the remaining 600 cm into 10 equal sections, with each section being 60 cm long.
Jack's rope is 7.5 meters long, which is equal to 750 centimetres. He gives his sister a piece of 150 centimetres, which leaves him with 600 centimetres of rope.
Jack then cuts the remaining piece into 10 equal sections. To find the length of each section, we can divide the total length of the rope (600 cm) by the number of sections (10):
600 cm ÷ 10 sections = 60 cm per section
Therefore, each section of rope that Jack cuts will be 60 centimetres long.
To learn more about length, refer:-
https://brainly.com/question/32060888
#SPJ11
Beatrice has two coins. The first coin is fair and the second coin is biased. The biased coin comes up heads with probability 2/3 and tails with probability 1/3. Beatrice selects one of the two coins at random and flips the selected coin 4 times. The result is HHTH. What is the probability that the fair coin was selected?
(8/81)(1/2) / ( (8/81)(1/2)+(1/16)(1/2) )
(1/16) / ( (8/81)+(1/16) )
(8/81)(1/2) / ( (2/81)(1/2)+(1/16)(1/2) )
(1/16) / ( (2/81)+(1/16) )
The probability that the fair coin was selected given that the sequence HHTH was observed is 81/145.
Let F denote the event that the fair coin is chosen and let B denote the event that the biased coin is chosen. We want to find the probability of F given that the four flips of the chosen coin resulted in the sequence HHTH:
P(F|HHTH) = [[tex]\frac{P(HHTH|F) P(F)}{P(HHTH|F) P(F) + P(HHTH|B) P(B)}[/tex]]
We know that P(F) = 1/2 and P(B) = 1/2 since Beatrice selected one of the coins at random.
Next, we need to calculate the probabilities of the outcomes HHTH for each of the two coins:
P(HHTH|F) = (1/2)⁴ = 1/16
P(HHTH|B) = (2/3)² (1/3)² = 4/81
Substituting these values, we get:
P(F|HHTH) = (1/16) (1/2) / [(1/16)(1/2) + (4/81)(1/2)]
= (1/16) (1/2) / (1/2) [(1/16) + (4/81)]
= (1/16) / [1/16 + 4/81]
= 81/145
Therefore, the probability that the fair coin was selected given that the sequence HHTH was observed is 81/145.
The correct answer is not one of the given options.
Learn more about Probability here
https://brainly.com/question/32001657
#SPJ4
A factory produces sheets of metal that are 0. 032 inch thick. Will a box that is 12 inches deep
hold 400 of these sheets?
If factory produces sheets of metal that are 0.032 inch thick, the box is not deep enough to hold 400 sheets of metal.
To determine whether a box that is 12 inches deep can hold 400 sheets of metal that are 0.032 inch thick, we need to calculate the total thickness of the sheets and compare it to the depth of the box.
The total thickness of 400 sheets can be calculated by multiplying the thickness of one sheet by the number of sheets:
0.032 inch/sheet x 400 sheets = 12.8 inches
So the total thickness of 400 sheets is 12.8 inches, which is greater than the depth of the box, which is 12 inches. This means that the box is not deep enough to hold 400 sheets of metal.
If the factory wants to store 400 sheets in a box that is 12 inches deep, they would need to use sheets that are thinner than 0.032 inch, or use a box that is deeper than 12 inches.
To learn more about thickness click on,
https://brainly.com/question/29207277
#SPJ4
Given h(x) = −2x + 12, calculate h(−4).
−8
4
8
20
Answer:
20
Step-by-step explanation:
h (x) = - 2x + 12
h (-4) = - 2(-4) + 12
= 8 + 12
h (-4) = 20
Based on your work in part A), find a function y(x) that satisfies the differential equation 22 y () In(x+1) V1 - 12 1+3 and initial condition y(0) = 5. + + 1+1
To find a function y(x) that satisfies the differential equation 22y'(x)/(In(x+1)V1 - 12(1+3))+1/(1+1) and initial condition y(0)=5, we first need to separate the variables and integrate both sides.
Starting with the differential equation:
22y'(x)/(In(x+1)V1 - 12(1+3))+1/(1+1) = 0
We can rearrange to get:
22y'(x) = -1/(1+1) * (In(x+1)V1 - 12(1+3))
Dividing both sides by 22 and integrating with respect to x, we get:
y(x) = (-1/22) * (In(x+1)V1 - 12(1+3)) + C
To solve for the constant C, we can use the initial condition y(0) = 5:
y(0) = (-1/22) * (In(0+1)V1 - 12(1+3)) + C
Simplifying:
5 = (-1/22) * (In(V1) - 12(4)) + C
5 = (-1/22) * (In(V1) - 48) + C
C = 5 + (1/22) * (In(V1) - 48)
Plugging in the value of C, we get the final solution:
y(x) = (-1/22) * (In(x+1)V1 - 12(1+3)) + 5 + (1/22) * (In(V1) - 48)
This function satisfies the given differential equation and initial condition.
To know more about integrate visit:
https://brainly.com/question/18125359
#SPJ11
CAN SOMEONE HELP ME PLEASEEEEE
Answer:
145°
Step-by-step explanation:
because opposite angles r equal
Find the size of angle x
Answer:
56°
Step-by-step explanation:
angles on a straight line add up to 180°
so we are already given that the other angle which lies on the same straight line with angle X is 124 ° .which means that we should subtract 124° from 180°
Find the Volume of the figure. Solve it (show your work):
The given figure is a Triangular prism
As we know, the volume of the prism is:
[tex]V = \frac{1}{2} *l*b*h\\[/tex]
where,
l = perpendicular length of the base triangle
b = base length of the base triangle
h = height of the prism
we have given:
l = 7m, b = 24m and h = 22m
So, the Volume of the given figure is:
[tex]Volume = \frac{1}{2}*7*24*22 = 12*7*22 = 1848m^3[/tex]
Read more about Triangular prism:
https://brainly.com/question/28795033
let f have an f-distribution with parameters r1 and r2. using the results of the last exercise, determine the kurtosis of f, assuming that r2 > 8.
The kurtosis of an F-distribution with parameters r1 and r2 is given by: Kurtosis = [ 8(r2 + 2r1 - 1) ] / [ r2 (r1 - 2) (r1 - 4) ]
Assuming that r2 > 8, we can use the approximation given in the previous exercise to simplify this expression: Kurtosis ≈ 3 + [ 12 (r2 - 8) ] / [ (r2 - 6) (r2 - 4) ]
Therefore, the kurtosis of an F-distribution with parameters r1 and r2, assuming that r2 > 8, is approximately equal to 3 plus the expression above.
Kurtosis is a measure of the "peakedness" or "flatness" of a distribution compared to the normal distribution. It measures the degree to which a distribution has more or less weight in the tails compared to the normal distribution.
A distribution with kurtosis greater than 3 is said to be "leptokurtic," meaning it has heavier tails than the normal distribution. A distribution with kurtosis less than 3 is said to be "platykurtic," meaning it has lighter tails than the normal distribution. A distribution with kurtosis equal to 3 is said to be "mesokurtic," meaning it has tails that are similar in weight to the normal distribution.
Visit here to learn more about kurtosis brainly.com/question/14799350
#SPJ11
compnay a charges $82 and allows unlimited mileage. company b has an intial fee of $55 and charges an additional $0.60 for every mile driven. for what mileage will company a charge less than company b
For distances of 45 miles or less, Company A is cheaper, while for distances greater than 45 miles, Company B is the cheaper option.
To determine at what mileage Company A charges less than Company B, we can set up an equation and solve for the variable, which in this case will represent the number of miles driven. Let x be the number of miles driven, and let C(x) represent the cost of renting a car from Company B after driving x miles.
We know that Company A charges a flat fee of $82 for unlimited mileage, so we can represent the cost of renting from Company A as a constant function C(x) = 82. For Company B, the cost function is given by:
C(x) = 55 + 0.60x
We want to find the value of x for which Company A charges less than Company B. In other words, we want to find the point at which the two cost functions intersect. To do this, we can set the two functions equal to each other and solve for x:
82 = 55 + 0.60x
27 = 0.60x
x = 45
Therefore, when the number of miles driven is 45 or less, Company A charges less than Company B. For any mileage greater than 45, it is cheaper to rent from Company B.
In summary, Company A charges a flat rate of $82 for unlimited mileage, while Company B charges an initial fee of $55 and an additional $0.60 for every mile driven. To find the point at which Company A charges less than Company B, we set the two cost functions equal to each other and solve for the number of miles driven. The result is 45 miles, meaning that for any distance of 45 miles or less, it is cheaper to rent from Company A, while for any distance greater than 45 miles, Company B is the cheaper option.
To learn more about flat rates
https://brainly.com/question/30812249
#SPJ4
PLSSS HELPPPP I NEEED THIS
Answer:
6. Inverse
7. Direct
8.
a. 21
b. '10, '12
c. Inverse
9.
a. 3000
b. 6000
c. Month 9 (January)
Step-by-step explanation:
4. [10 points] solve the following recurrence relation: t (0) = 1; t (n) = t (n 1) 3
The closed-form solution for the given recurrence relation t(n) = t(n-1) * 3 with the base case t(0) = 1 is:
t(n) = 3^n
1. Start with the given recurrence relation: t(n) = t(n-1) * 3
2. Notice that the base case is t(0) = 1
3. We can rewrite the relation for a few terms to recognize the pattern:
t(1) = t(0) * 3 = 3^1
t(2) = t(1) * 3 = (3^1) * 3 = 3^2
t(3) = t(2) * 3 = (3^2) * 3 = 3^3
4. Based on this pattern, we can generalize the closed-form solution as t(n) = 3^n
The closed-form solution for the given recurrence relation t(n) = t(n-1) * 3 with the base case t(0) = 1 is t(n) = 3^n.
To know more about relation visit:
https://brainly.com/question/31111483
#SPJ11