Yes, All of the underlying elements of a crime must be proven by the prosecutor: Actus reus, Mens rea, Causation, Concurrence, and legality.
What are the elements to prove that a crime has been committedIn criminal law, the prosecutor must establish several underlying elements to prove that a crime has been committed. These elements include:
1. Actus reus: This refers to the criminal act itself. The prosecutor must show that the defendant performed a voluntary action that resulted in a crime, such as theft or assault.
2. Mens rea: This is the mental state of the defendant at the time of the crime. The prosecutor must prove that the defendant had criminal intent or a "guilty mind" when committing the act.
3. Causation: The prosecutor must establish a clear link between the defendant's actions and the outcome of the crime. This element proves that the defendant's actions directly caused the crime to occur.
4. Concurrence: This element demonstrates that both the actus reus and mens rea occurred at the same time, meaning the defendant had criminal intent while performing the criminal act.
5. Legality: The prosecutor must show that the defendant's actions violated an existing criminal law or statute.
By proving all of these underlying elements, the prosecutor can establish that the defendant is guilty of the crime charged.
The burden of proof lies with the prosecutor, and all elements must be proven beyond a reasonable doubt to secure a conviction.
Learn more about prosecutor at
https://brainly.com/question/30482974
#SPJ11
A crime that is 'evil in itself" and which has been considered historically evil and completely intolerable by the common law and in most world cultures is:
Murder is considered an "evil in itself" crime, historically condemned by common law and almost all world cultures.
Murder is universally recognized as a heinous crime that involves the taking of another person's life. The common law has long considered murder to be a crime that is inherently evil and intolerable, and this view is reflected in the harsh penalties associated with the crime, such as life imprisonment or even the death penalty.
Moreover, virtually all world cultures have also condemned murder, often viewing it as a grave moral offense that violates fundamental values such as the sanctity of human life and the duty to respect the inherent dignity of every individual.
Overall, murder is widely considered to be one of the most serious crimes, and is subject to severe legal and social sanctions in virtually every society.
For more questions like Crime click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/31365862
#SPJ11
Another term used to describe the phrase "Due Process" in our system of law is:
The term used to describe "Due Process" in our system of law is "fair treatment".
Due process is a fundamental principle of the United States legal system that requires the government to respect all legal rights of an individual. It ensures that a person is not deprived of their life, liberty, or property without fair treatment under the law.
"Fair treatment" is a term used to describe due process in simpler terms that emphasize the right of every person to a fair and impartial legal process.
The term "fair treatment" implies that every individual is entitled to a legal process that is unbiased and impartial, and that the government cannot arbitrarily take away their rights without due process of law.
For more questions like Law click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/6107503
#SPJ11
t/f one difference between the british parliamentary system and the nigerian presidential system is that the nigerian presidential system
"One difference between the british parliamentary system and the nigerian presidential system is that the nigerian presidential system. The given statement is true.
The British parliamentary system and the Nigerian presidential system differ primarily in their executive structures. The British system features a Prime Minister elected by the Parliament, while the Nigerian system has a directly elected president who serves as both the head of state and government.
The Prime Minister is chosen from the political party that wins the majority of seats in the parliament. In this system, the Prime Minister is the head of government and has the power to dissolve parliament.
On the other hand, the Nigerian presidential system is a form of government where the President is both the head of state and head of government.
The President is directly elected by the people and is not accountable to the legislature. The executive, legislative, and judiciary branches of government are separate and independent of each other.
In the Nigerian presidential system, the President has the power to veto legislation passed by the legislature, but the legislature can override the veto with a two-thirds majority vote.
In contrast, in the British parliamentary system, the Prime Minister and their Cabinet have collective responsibility for the decisions made by the government, and the Prime Minister can be removed from office by a vote of no confidence in the parliament.
Overall, the parliamentary system and presidential system have their own unique strengths and weaknesses, and it is up to each country to determine which system works best for their needs.
True, one difference between the British parliamentary system and the Nigerian presidential system is that the Nigerian presidential system has a separately elected president, while the British system does not.
In the British parliamentary system, the executive branch's leader is the Prime Minister, who is elected by members of the majority party in Parliament.
The Prime Minister then selects a Cabinet of Ministers to form the government. The head of state in the British system is the monarch, who has limited powers and mostly serves a ceremonial role.
On the other hand, the Nigerian presidential system is a blend of the British parliamentary and American presidential systems. In Nigeria, the president is both the head of state and the head of government, elected directly by the people. The president has executive powers and forms a Cabinet to assist in governance. The consisting of the Senate and the House of Representatives, acts as the legislative branch.
Visit here to learn more about House of Representatives:
brainly.com/question/25965873
#SPJ11
barb and carlie enter into a contract for the cleaning of carlies property for which she agrees to pay barb 1000 barb transfers her duty under this contract to dean
Barb and Carlie entered into a contract for the cleaning of Carlie's property, for which Carlie agreed to pay Barb $1000. However, Barb decided to transfer her duty under this contract to Dean. This transfer of duties is known as delegation, which means that Barb is transferring her obligations under the contract to Dean.
However, it is important to note that the transfer of duties does not release Barb from her obligations under the contract. She is still liable for any breach of the contract that occurs. In addition, Carlie has the right to reject the delegation if she believes that Dean is not competent or reliable enough to fulfill the obligations under the contract.
Overall, the transfer of duties is a common practice in contracts and is often used when one party is unable or unwilling to fulfill their obligations. However, it is important to ensure that the transfer is done properly and that all parties are aware of their obligations and responsibilities.
To know more about transfer of duties visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30167299
#SPJ11
the u.s. constitution provides the basis for equality and defines immutable characteristics such as race and sex.
The United States Constitution serves as the foundation for civil rights and liberties in the United States. The Constitution grants all citizens the same rights, regardless of race, gender, or other immutable characteristics.
It was the first document of its kind to address the issue of equality and has served as an important catalyst in the civil rights movement. The Constitution also forbids laws that create an unequal burden on any particular group. This ensures that all citizens, regardless of race or gender, are treated equally under the law.
Furthermore, the Constitution guarantees basic civil rights such as freedom of speech, press, and assembly, as well as due process. These rights create a level playing field for all citizens and ensure that no one is discriminated against or denied their fundamental rights.
know more about Constitution here
https://brainly.com/question/19411179#
#SPJ11
A more modern name for a Virtual Machine Manager (VMM) is a _________________.
A more modern name for a Virtual Machine Manager (VMM) is a Hypervisor or Virtualization Manager.
A Hypervisor or Virtualization Manager is software that creates and manages virtual machines (VMs) on a physical machine. It provides a layer of abstraction between the physical hardware and the virtual machines, allowing multiple operating systems to run simultaneously on the same hardware.
This technology has become increasingly important as organizations seek to consolidate servers and reduce hardware costs while maintaining the ability to run multiple operating systems and applications.
Hypervisors can be classified into two types: Type 1 hypervisors run directly on the host's hardware, while Type 2 hypervisors run as an application on a host operating system. Examples of popular hypervisors include VMware vSphere, Microsoft Hyper-V, and KVM.
For more questions like Organization click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/29694317
#SPJ11
Describe collectivization. How did farmers react to this policy? Was it successful?
Collectivization was a policy implemented by the Soviet Union in the late 1920s and early 1930s, which aimed to consolidate individual farms into large, state-owned collective farms. The primary goal was to increase agricultural productivity and support the rapid industrialization of the country.
Farmers' reactions to this policy were mixed. Many resisted collectivization due to the loss of their land, livestock, and autonomy. They were often forced into joining the collective farms, leading to widespread resentment and even instances of rebellion. However, some farmers supported the policy as they believed it could lead to better agricultural practices and improve their living conditions.
As for the success of collectivization, it is debated. While the policy did lead to increased agricultural production in some areas, the overall results were mixed. Forced collectivization and poor management led to widespread food shortages, famine, and the death of millions of people, particularly in Ukraine. In the long term, collectivization is considered to have had negative consequences on the agricultural sector and the wellbeing of the rural population.
learn more about collectivization here
brainly.com/question/28314073
#SPJ11
the approach to law that views the law as a vehicle to improve the lives of those involved is _____
The approach to law that views the law as a vehicle to improve the lives of those involved is called the social welfare approach.
The social welfare approach to law emphasizes the promotion of social justice, fairness, and the improvement of individual and collective well-being. It recognizes that the law can be a powerful tool for addressing social and economic inequalities and advancing the common good. This approach seeks to balance the interests of individuals and society as a whole by promoting policies that protect the vulnerable and promote the greater good. It is often associated with progressive legal movements, such as those focused on civil rights, consumer protection, and environmental justice.
To know more about the social welfare approach to law, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29214791
#SPJ11
a motion presented prior to trial to determine the admissibility of certain items of evidence is called a
A motion presented prior to trial to determine the admissibility of certain items of evidence is called a pretrial motion.
Here are some additional points about pretrial motions:
Pretrial motions are typically filed by attorneys during the pretrial phase of a case, after the complaint and answer have been filed but before trial begins.The purpose of a pretrial motion is to limit the evidence that can be presented at trial, either by excluding certain evidence altogether or by restricting the manner in which it can be presented.Common types of pretrial motions include motions to suppress evidence, motions for summary judgment, and motions to dismiss.The judge will review the pretrial motion and make a determination as to whether the evidence should be admitted at trial or excluded.This type of motion is used by attorneys to request that a judge exclude certain evidence from being presented to a jury at trial.
Learn More Abut Pretrial motion
https://brainly.com/question/30054312
#SPJ11
The religious or spiritual principal used by Henry II to spread out and to enforce the concept of a criminal law administered by a central government authority across the length and breadth of Great Britain was called,
The religious or spiritual principle used by Henry II to spread and enforce the concept of a criminal law administered by a central government authority across Great Britain was called the Royal Assize.
This principle was rooted in the belief that the King had a divine mandate to establish a unified legal system for his subjects. Henry II introduced the Royal Assize as a means to centralize the administration of justice and establish a uniform system of criminal law throughout the kingdom. The Assize Courts, presided over by itinerant judges, were established to hear cases in various regions, ensuring the fair application of law in all corners of the realm. This not only helped to enforce the King's authority but also provided a more consistent and impartial system of justice for the people.
The Royal Assize played a crucial role in the development of the English legal system by bringing the rule of law under a single authority. This centralized approach, guided by the belief in the King's divine right to govern, laid the foundation for the establishment of a coherent and efficient legal framework in Great Britain, which has evolved over time and continues to influence legal systems around the world.
Learn more about Henry II here: https://brainly.com/question/30017761
#SPJ11
I have to give a speech for culture minister in my school for the parliament election
Giving a speech for the culture minister in your school for the parliament election is a fantastic opportunity to showcase your public speaking skills and share your ideas with your fellow students. Here are some tips to help you prepare for your speech:
1. Research the Culture Ministry: Take some time to research the Culture Ministry and its mission.
2. Practice, practice, practice: Practice your speech several times before the actual day.
3. Identify key themes: Identify a few key themes or ideas that you want to focus on in your speech.
4. Engage your audience: Try to engage your audience with anecdotes, stories or examples that illustrate your points.
5. Be concise: Keep your speech concise and to the point. Avoid rambling or going off on tangents.
To know more about speech:
https://brainly.com/question/29769492
#SPJ4
Technically speaking (note - "technically speaking"), at common law, a simple and unwanted touching of another person that did not actually cause physical harm was technically called:
Technically speaking (note - "technically speaking"), at common law, a simple and unwanted touching of another person that did not actually cause physical harm was technically called Battery.
Technically speaking, at common law, the intentional and unconsented touching of another person, even if it does not result in physical harm, is considered battery. The term "battery" is often used interchangeably with "assault," which refers to the threat or attempt to cause harm or offensive physical contact.
Battery is a type of tort, or civil wrong, for which the victim may seek compensation for any resulting damages, including emotional distress or physical injury. It is important to note that criminal charges for battery may also apply, depending on the circumstances of the case.
For more questions like Law click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/6107503
#SPJ11
cosgrove (jeffrey donovan) and shaw (mehcad brooks) visit a cult house to get answers about a murder victim, and cosgrove recognizes a cry for help from one of the members (sadie veach).
In the scenario you've presented, it seems that Cosgrove and Shaw are investigating a murder and believe that the cult house may hold some answers.
While at the house, Cosgrove recognizes a cry for help from one of the members, Sadie Veach. This could mean that Sadie is potentially in danger and needs assistance. It's possible that Sadie is being coerced or threatened by the cult, and her cry for help may indicate that she wants to leave but is unable to do so on her own.
If Cosgrove recognizes this cry for help, it's likely that he will take action to investigate further and potentially try to rescue Sadie. This could involve gathering more information about the cult and its members, speaking with Sadie directly to understand her situation, and possibly involving law enforcement if necessary. Ultimately, the goal would be to ensure that Sadie is safe and able to leave the cult if she chooses to do so.
For more about investigating:
https://brainly.com/question/1191670
#SPJ11
Question # 3 Multiple Select What attributes of a chemical weapon make them particularly difficult to identify before they inflict widespread damage? Select all that apply. They may be relatively small and easy to conceal. The time required for the toxic effects of the chemicals to affect humans can be delayed by as much as forty-eight hours. They can be dispersed using aerosol or other propellants directly into the air. They inevitably do not have any fingerprints or other identifying features attached to them.
The attributes of a chemical weapon make them particularly difficult to identify before they inflict widespread damage are
They may be relatively small and easy to conceal.They can be dispersed using aerosol or other propellants directly into the air. What is the chemical weapon?Chemical weapons are made to let out harmful chemicals that can hurt people or the world around us. These weapons might be hard to recognize before they cause a lot of damage because of some special qualities they have.
Therefore, based on the above, one can say that Chemical weapons can be tiny and hard to notice, which makes them tricky to find.
Learn more about chemical weapon from
https://brainly.com/question/30151221
#SPJ1
True/False: one of the most common reasons that people do not turn out to vote in elections is that they are not registered
Answer: True. One of the most common reasons why people do not turn out to vote in elections is that they are not registered to vote. In many countries, including the United States, voters must register before they are allowed to cast their ballots. Failure to register, or not being registered in the correct precinct, can prevent individuals from voting. Other common reasons for low voter turnout include apathy, lack of interest in politics, distrust of government or politicians, and the belief that their vote does not matter or will not make a difference.
The given statement "one of the most common reasons that people do not turn out to vote in elections is that they are not registered" is true because voter registration is a crucial process that determines a person's eligibility to vote in an election.
Without registration, an individual cannot participate in the electoral process. Moreover, voter registration requirements may vary from state to state, adding to the complexity of the process. According to the Pew Research Center, around 35% of people who are eligible to vote in the US have not registered. The reasons for not registering to vote may vary from a lack of interest in the political process to misinformation about the registration requirements.
Some people may also face barriers to voter registration, such as language barriers, lack of access to transportation or technology, or voter suppression efforts. Encouraging voter registration and addressing these barriers can help to increase voter turnout and ensure that everyone has a voice in the democratic process.
For more about voter registration:
https://brainly.com/question/12308981
#SPJ11
That part of traditional Western law that creates and defines fundamental rights and duties and which is the basis of this class is called.....
The part of traditional Western law that creates and defines fundamental rights and duties is called "constitutional law."
Constitutional law refers to the body of law that governs the interpretation and application of a country's constitution. It defines the powers and limitations of the government and protects the rights and freedoms of individuals.
Constitutional law serves as the basis for the legal system of a country and provides a framework for the functioning of the government and society as a whole. It sets out the fundamental principles, structures, and processes of the government and establishes the rights and duties of citizens.
Constitutional law is typically considered to be the highest form of law in a country, as all other laws must be consistent with it. In the United States, for example, the Constitution is the supreme law of the land and all other laws must conform to its provisions.
For more questions like Law click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/6107503
#SPJ11
Choose all of the following that are tactics that states can pursue if they believe that another state is committing human rights violations.
- states may use economic incentives to persuade another state to improve its human rights record
- states may use force to intervene in another state for severe human rights violations.
- states may sanction another state to punish them for human rights abuses
incorrect answers:
- states may remove another state from the security council for human rights violations.
Answer: The correct answers are:
States may use economic incentives to persuade another state to improve its human rights record.
States may use sanctions to punish another state for human rights abuses.
States may use diplomatic pressure to persuade another state to improve its human rights record.
The use of force to intervene in another state for severe human rights violations is a controversial and complex issue that may be justified under certain circumstances, such as in cases of genocide or crimes against humanity, but is generally not considered a standard tactic.
The statement "states may remove another state from the security council for human rights violations" is incorrect because the United Nations Security Council does not have the power to remove a member state. The five permanent members of the Security Council (China, France, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) do have veto power, which can prevent the Security Council from taking action, but they cannot remove a member state.
Tactics that states can pursue if they believe that another state is committing human rights violations.
The correct answers are that states may use economic incentives to persuade another state to improve its human rights record and that states may use force to intervene in another state for severe human rights violations. These tactics are often used in international relations to promote human rights and prevent abuses.
Using economic incentives, such as trade agreements or aid packages, can encourage another state to improve its human rights record. For example, a state may offer trade incentives to a state that improves its labor laws or treatment of minorities. Sanctions can also be used as a tactic to punish another state for human rights abuses.
In severe cases of human rights violations, states may use force to intervene and protect populations from harm. This tactic, however, is controversial and can lead to unintended consequences. States must weigh the potential benefits of intervention against the risks and costs involved.
Removing a state from the security council for human rights violations is not a tactic that states can pursue. The security council is a body of the United Nations, and its members are elected by the General Assembly. States cannot unilaterally remove another state from the security council for human rights violations.
For more about human rights violations:
https://brainly.com/question/28182376
#SPJ11
which of the following is an organizational antecedent of political behavior? a. expectations of success b. role ambiguity c. political skill d. internal locus
The organizational antecedent of political behavior is b) role ambiguity. Role ambiguity is the lack of clarity or uncertainty about job responsibilities and expectations, which can lead employees to engage in political behavior to gain information or influence.
For example, if a manager is unclear about their role or expectations, they may engage in political behavior to gain power or control within the organization. This can include forming alliances, using persuasion tactics, or engaging in manipulative behavior.
Expectations of success, political skill, and internal locus are not organizational antecedents of political behavior. Expectations of success may influence an individual's motivation or effort, but it is not an organizational factor that encourages political behavior.
Political skill and internal locus are individual traits that can facilitate political behavior, but they are not organizational antecedents.
To know more about role ambiguity visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30625181
#SPJ11
What is absence of a public record under 803(10)?
An absence of a public record under Federal Rule of Evidence 803(10) is admissible as evidence if it is proven that the record should exist, but does not.
This means that if a record is required to be kept by law or regulation, and it cannot be produced, the absence of that record can be used as evidence in court. For example, if a police department is required by law to maintain a record of all arrests made within their jurisdiction, and a defendant claims they were not arrested, the absence of a record of that arrest could be used as evidence against the defendant's claim.
It is important to note that the party seeking to admit the absence of a public record as evidence must prove that the record should exist and that a diligent search was conducted to find the record. If the party opposing the admission of the evidence can show that the record may never have existed or was not required to be kept, then the absence of the record may not be admissible.
know more about public record here:
https://brainly.com/question/30101399
#SPJ11
By far the most common type of "strict liability" crimes and one that happens every day is/are
The most common type of strict liability crimes are regulatory offenses, such as traffic violations or selling alcohol to a minor.
Strict liability crimes do not require the prosecution to prove intent, only that the defendant committed the act. Regulatory offenses are the most common type of strict liability crimes, and they are frequently committed. These offenses are generally minor, but they serve to regulate activities that are considered to be potentially dangerous or harmful to the public.
Traffic violations, such as speeding or running a red light, are examples of regulatory offenses. Selling alcohol to a minor is another common strict liability offense because it poses a risk to public safety. While these offenses are relatively minor, they are still punishable by fines or imprisonment.
For more questions like Crime click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/31365862
#SPJ11
What is the definition of hearsay under 801(c)?
Under 801(c), hearsay is defined as a statement that a declarant makes out of court, offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted.
Hearsay is a fundamental concept in the rules of evidence. It refers to an out-of-court statement made by someone other than the witness who is testifying in court. The statement is offered as evidence to prove the truth of what it asserts.
Under Rule 801(c) of the Federal Rules of Evidence, hearsay is defined as "a statement that the declarant does not make while testifying at the current trial or hearing and that a party offers in evidence to prove the truth of the matter asserted in the statement."
Hearsay is generally not admissible in court, but there are exceptions to the rule, such as when the statement falls under a recognized exception or the declarant is unavailable to testify.
For more questions like Federal Rule click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/28592086
#SPJ11
An offender in a domestic violence case was made to stand before his wife while she was allowed to spit in his face. This is an example of a _________________.
This is an example of a public humiliation as a form of punishment in a domestic violence case.
Michael is terrified of being humiliated in front of others. He probably suffers from social anxiety in public humiliation.
Social anxiety disorder or social phobia is characterised by a persistent and intense fear of social situations. It's a common problem that usually shows up throughout adolescence. It might be quite upsetting and have a big impact on your public life. Some people discover that things improve with age. But despite receiving no therapy, it continues in a large number of cases.
Social phobia and shyness are not the same thing. It's a constant anxiety that affects daily life, relationships, relationships with others, and life at work or in school. Although many people worry occasionally about social situations, people with social anxiety worry excessively before, during, and after them.
Learn more about Social phobia here
https://brainly.com/question/29761664
#SPJ11
In 100 words or more, identify and discuss safety concerns that apply when processing an underwater crime scene. PLEASE WRITE A FULL SENTENCE OR L WILL REPORT YOU.
The scene: – scene was already contaminated, resulting in a vast loss of probable evidence (up to 80%)
Moisture had artificial and degraded some evidence such as fingerprints and DNA, particularly on the decks where it had come into contact with seawater. The strain was experienced in accessing the scene at sea.
Marking the position of displays for capturing was difficult due to the continuous motion of the vessel.
The equipment taken aboard was more suitable for processing terrestrial scenes (cameras and reagents were affected by moisture and weather changes.
Reagents not correctly packed were affected by moisture due to humidity. Lenses converted covered in humidity, and no lens cleaning tissues were available.)
The dispensation was interrupted and had to be immobile when the container was affected by rough weather.
Time for processing was much too short, and members had to rush processing. In many cases, the collection was limited to merely ‘bagging and tagging’ and documentation.
The difficulty is to take controller, secure, and keep the scene.
The partial time exists to procedure and document the scene (due to having to avoid expensive delays to the vessel’s owners).
Limits on the use of equipment such as flashy photography, electrostatic dust lifter, and other specialized equipment due to security dealings aboard the container.
Time interactions during photography were difficult. The container was stopped and was lying head to wind beam on to the sea and rolling, making the platform for the time exposure camera unbalanced and causing blurring.
Maintenance of used equipment such as recharging of batteries was difficult and accessibility of power with compatible current (220 V in this instance) a challenge.
Prostitution, gambling, drug abuse and most traffic charges are example of what is known as ______________crimes.
Prostitution, gambling, drug abuse, and most traffic charges are examples of what is known as victimless crimes.
Victimless crimes are offenses where no individual is directly harmed or injured as a result of the illegal activity. These acts may be considered immoral or unethical but do not result in tangible harm to another person. Instead, they primarily involve consenting adults engaging in activities that are deemed criminal by the legal system.
Some argue that labeling these acts as crimes leads to unnecessary policing and enforcement efforts, as well as overcrowded prisons. Others maintain that they should remain criminalized, as they can lead to societal harm or create negative externalities, such as increased healthcare costs or public safety concerns. However, it is essential to recognize that while these activities may not have a clear-cut victim, they can still contribute to negative societal impacts.
In conclusion, victimless crimes, such as prostitution, gambling, drug abuse, and traffic charges, are offenses in which no individual is directly harmed. While they may not involve a clear victim, the potential for societal harm should be considered when addressing these types of crimes.
Learn more about Victimless crimes here: https://brainly.com/question/17251009
#SPJ11
Provide an appraisal on Judiciary imperialism and politicization of the international criminal justice in Africa
It is clear that both judiciary imperialism and politicization of international criminal justice are serious issues that require careful consideration and attention. To address these challenges, it is important to promote greater transparency and accountability in the international criminal justice system, and to ensure that the courts and tribunals are guided by principles of fairness, impartiality, and due process.
This requires the involvement and cooperation of all stakeholders, including African governments, international institutions, civil society organizations, and the wider international community.
Judiciary imperialism and politicization of international criminal justice in Africa are complex issues that have raised significant concerns among scholars and experts in the field of law and international relations.
To know more about judiciary:
https://brainly.com/question/14305259
#SPJ4
Criminal justice essay
Begin with you pretending to be the President of the American Society of Criminology, a famous scholar with a major theory of your own right, delivering the annual Presidential keynote address. (You may want to look up in a research journal, like Criminology, what a Presidential Annual Address looks like) A certain amount of graded discussion will take place over this assignment along with further tips and hints, but here are general guidelines:
a) Use your own name, not one of a known criminologist, and use your own voice
b) Assume a fictitious theory of your own that is popular but need only be referenced vaguely as a point of reference; i.e., you do not have to spell out what your theory is for this assignment
c) Persuasively and definitively chart the course of the field, while naming names, major ideas (such as at least 10 or so concepts), perspectives, approaches, etc.
d) Be extremely more definitive about disciplinary and interdisciplinary issues such as whether psychology or sociology should more heavily chart the field, and why
e) Remind the audience of any enduring debates that can be resolved or cannot be
f) Delineate the contours of the field, what it should intellectually be more involved in
Answer:
I think you should go with A
Explanation:
For the simple fact that you are the one saying it and not someone else and it comes from your state of mind and not someone else's
Select the words the complete each of the major differences between contracts under the common law and the UCC.
1. Contract Terms
2. Acceptance
3. Contract Modification
4. Irrevocable Offers
5. Statute of Frauds Requirements
The words that complete each of the major differences between contracts under the common law and the UCC. Under the common law, contracts require definite and certain terms, while under the UCC, contracts can have open terms that can be filled in later.
Contract modification under the common law requires mutual agreement and consideration, while under the UCC, modification can occur without consideration as long as it is made in good faith.
Acceptance under the common law must be a mirror image of the offer, while under the UCC, acceptance can include additional or different terms, which become part of the contract unless they materially alter the offer.
Irrevocable offers are rare under the common law, while under the UCC, offers are irrevocable if they are in writing and signed by the offeror.
Finally, the statute of frauds requirements are more strict under the common law, while the UCC has more lenient requirements for contracts related to the sale of goods.
The major differences between contracts under common law and the UCC.
1. Contract Terms: Common law requires definite and specific terms, while the UCC allows for more flexible and open terms.
2. Acceptance: Under common law, acceptance must strictly conform to the offer (mirror image rule). The UCC allows for acceptance even if it contains additional or different terms, depending on the parties involved and the circumstances.
3. Contract Modification: Common law generally requires new consideration for modifications to be enforceable, while the UCC permits modifications in good faith without additional consideration.
4. Irrevocable Offers: In common law, offers are typically revocable until acceptance. The UCC recognizes firm offers which, under certain conditions, can make an offer irrevocable without consideration for a specified period.
5. Statute of Frauds Requirements: Common law has specific requirements for contracts to be in writing (e.g., real estate, contracts over a year). The UCC requires written contracts for the sale of goods over $500, but has more lenient requirements on the form and content of the writing.
Visit here to learn more about Contracts:
brainly.com/question/5746834
#SPJ11
fill in the blank. ___ was overturned by a supreme court decision.forbids the admission of illegally seized material evidence at trial.cannot be used to prevent confessions from being introduced as evidence.requires that suspects be read their rights before questioning.all of the above are true.
The Miranda rule: requires that suspects be read their rights before questioning. The correct answer is D.
The Miranda rule requires that suspects be read their rights before questioning. This rule was established by the U.S. Supreme Court in the landmark case Miranda v. Arizona (1966). The purpose of the Miranda rule is to protect an individual's Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination during custodial interrogations.
According to the Miranda rule, a suspect must be informed of their right to remain silent, their right to an attorney, and that anything they say can be used against them in court. If these rights are not properly read to the suspect, any subsequent confession or statement may be inadmissible as evidence in court.
To know more about Miranda rule, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/29546056#
#SPJ11
Complete question
The Miranda rule:
a. was overturned by a Supreme Court decision.
b. forbids the admission of illegally seized material evidence at trial.
c. cannot be used to prevent confessions from being introduced as evidence.
d. requires that suspects be read their rights before questioning.
e. All of the above are true.
Behavioral incidents that adversely affect the quality of life in a neighborhood, resulting in the development of new laws to address such behavior are known as
"Quality of life offenses" is the name given to actions that negatively impact the livability of a community, prompting the creation of new laws aimed at addressing these behaviors.
Behavioral incidents that adversely affect the quality of life in a neighborhood are known as quality of life offenses. These offenses are often minor in nature but can have a significant impact on the community's livability and safety. Common examples of quality of life offenses include public intoxication, loitering, noise disturbances, littering, and vandalism.
Quality of life offenses can create a sense of disorder and fear in a neighborhood and may attract more serious criminal activity. To address these issues, municipalities may develop new laws and regulations aimed at curbing these behaviors. These laws may provide for increased enforcement and penalties for quality of life offenses.
By addressing quality of life offenses, municipalities can improve the safety and well-being of residents, enhance community livability, and promote economic development. The enforcement of quality of life laws can also deter more serious crimes and create a sense of order and security in the community.
See more about quality of life at https://brainly.com/question/20409373.
#SPJ11
fill in the blank. since godinez v. moran (1993), some scholars have suggested that instead of using terms such as competence to stand trial and competence to plead guilty, use the term____as it is a better way to describe the multiple abilities that criminal defendants are expected to have.
Since the Godinez v. Moran (1993) case, some scholars have suggested that instead of using terms such as competence to stand trial and competence to plead guilty, we should use the term decision-making capacity as it is a better way to describe the multiple abilities that criminal defendants are expected to have.
The reasoning behind this suggestion is that "decision-making capacity" encompasses a broader range of abilities that a defendant should possess in order to effectively participate in their defense and understand the consequences of their decisions.
These abilities include understanding the charges against them, comprehending the legal process, being able to communicate with their attorney, and making rational choices about their case strategy.
By using the term "decision-making capacity," we can emphasize the importance of these various skills and create a more comprehensive assessment of a defendant's abilities in the criminal justice system.
To summarize, since the Godinez v. Moran (1993) case, scholars have recommended using "decision-making capacity" instead of terms like competence to stand trial and competence to plead guilty, as it better captures the multiple abilities criminal defendants are expected to have in order to effectively participate in their defense and make informed decisions about their case.
To know more about Godinez v. Moran, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28216472#
#SPJ11