Answer:
a lower cost
Explanation:
Answer:
A
Explanation:
Washington said we can't have “national morality" without "religious principles." Do you agree with him? Explain
Answer:
In “The Farewell Address,” George Washington describes religion and morality as the two indispensable pillars which support political prosperity. He then says that we should be cautious about the idea that morality can flourish without religion and concludes with the assertion:
"Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure, reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle."
There is considerable debate about the religious opinions of the founding fathers, including Washington. Whether he meant it or not, however, this statement is clearly false. There is no clear correlation between religious principles and national morality, let alone any good evidence that one causes the other. This would have been less clear two hundred years ago, since practically every nation had an established church, from which it was often difficult for many people to dissent publicly. Nonetheless, it is now clear that secular nations such as Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Belgium are sustained by a national morality at least as strong as any religious nation. These countries have low rates of crime and particularly of violent crime. They have enlightened, compassionate social policies which enjoy the support of the majority of citizens. Their presses are freer and their political systems less corrupt than the average in Europe, let alone worldwide. They conform in every material respect to the founding fathers’ notion of political prosperity.
In addition to other attitudes and behaviors, religion and morality are fundamental cornerstones of political prosperity. If someone sought to weaken these crucial bases of human happiness and the most powerful pillars of men's and citizens' obligations.
What do you mean by morality?Morality is the separation between what is deemed proper and what is unsuitable in terms of intents, choices, and behaviors.
Morality can be a set of rules or guidelines generated from a set of rules of behaviour from a specific philosophy, religion, or culture, or it can come from a rule that a person feels ought to be applied to everyone. Goodness or rightness are more exactly synonyms for morality.
Meta-ethics, which examines abstract concepts like moral ontology and moral epistemology, and normative ethics, which examines more concrete frameworks for forming moral judgments like deontological ethics and consequentialism, are both branches of moral philosophy.
The Golden Rule, which argues that "one should treat others as one would like others to treat oneself," is an illustration of normative ethical philosophy.
While amorality is variously referred to as ignorance of, indifference to, or denial in any certain set of moral standards or principles, immorality is the active resistance to morality.
Learn more about morality, here
https://brainly.com/question/13107468
#SPJ5
The Prime Meridian and the Arctic Circle meet in what sea?
Answer:
The Norwegian sea.
Explanation:
Hope this helps
People who won the land lottery were known as
Group of answer choices
fortunate drawers
big game winners
favored winners
lucky lottos
Answer:
I'm pretty sure is A :). Let me know if it's wrong.
Explanation:
They were called fortune drawers, because they were fortunate to be able to win some lands while others were not very fortunate to get anything.
Which plan proposed at the United States Constitutional Convention solved the issue of representation in Congress?
A
The Three-Fifths Compromise
В.
The Connecticut Compromise
C
Elastic Clause
D
Preamble
Answer:
The correct answer is B. the Connecticut Compromise. Connecticut Compromise was propose after Pinckney's plan and it is the last one.
Explanation: