Answer:
After the U.S. Constitution was ratified (approved by the states), the states wrote or amended
their own state constitutions. Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution states: “The United
States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government”.
Because the U.S. Constitution served as a guideline, many state constitutions look very similar
to the national constitution, including the Florida Constitution. The U.S. and Florida
constitutions both have a preamble (an introduction that states the purpose and goals of
government), articles (sections that describe the powers and functions of the government), and
amendments (changes that have been made to the constitution). While the basic outline of the
U.S. Constitution and the Florida Constitution are the same, the contents of the two documents
have major differences.
In the nineteenth century, Indian nationalism developed in response to *
A. the colonial occupation of India by the Chinese Empire.
B. the colonial occupation of India by the United Kingdom.
C. the increasing influence of the Sikh minority population.
D. the increasing influence of the Muslim minority population.
Answer: Indian nationalism developed as a concept during the Indian independence movement which campaigned for independence from British rule. Indian nationalism is an instance of territorial nationalism, which is inclusive of all of the people of India, despite their diverse ethnic, linguistic and religious backgrounds.
Explanation:
1. The cause of campaign finance reform
was first taken up during which
presidency?
Richard Nixon
Barack Obama
Franklin Roosevelt
Theodore Roosevelt
Answer:the answer is Theodore Roosevelt
Explanation:I took this on usatestprep and got it correct
In regards to the Holocaust, what is Bystander?
Answer:
The bookshelves and film racks are filled with accounts of the Holocaust that
focus on three representative figures: the victim, the perpetrator, and the selfless
savior. The victims are the most numerous. Those who were killed, enslaved, and
tortured totaled into the millions with Jews, Gypsies, homosexuals, political and
religious activists, and the mentally and physically disabled marked as prime
targets. In pursuit was the Nazi killing machine, Germans and their collaborators,
which methodically organized men and women to annihilate whole communities.
Comparatively, a handful of people later anointed as the “righteous among the
nations,” risked their lives to protect those in danger.1
Missing from these accounts is by far the largest number of people, the
bystanders, who witnessed the Holocaust ravage Europe. They raised no objection
to the horrors that befell their neighbors. They swore their denial of events. Others
would claim that the risk of resistance was too high. What could one man or
woman do under the circumstances? Later some would seek absolution by insisting
that they were merely following orders. They had become bystanders, without will,
to morality. Acquiescing to power and circumstance, disengaged, all of these men
and women, wrote philosopher Simone de Beauvoir, were “silenced by [h]istory.”2
Their silence offers proof of John Stuart Mill’s observation about the bystander:
“Bad men need nothing more to compass their ends, than that good men should
look on and do nothing.”3 Decisions about goodness, however, should be withheld.
This essay will consider three aspects in the matter of the bystander during the
Holocaust. First, this essay will consider the intellectual and historical
complexities of defining bystanders and assessing their role. How does the
historian investigate those who remained in the background, blurred faces as
events passed by? Second, this essay will assess the importance of context. How
do specific historical, national, and local circumstances affect bystander behavior?
These factors also open to view the actions of those who collaborated and those.
why was there opposition against the government of India, act 1935
Answer:
hello and bye
Explanation:
Ans: The Indian Act of 1935 was not liked nor was even appreciated by the Indian people. This
was opposed for a number of reasons. One was that the G.G was head of federation and could
exert special powers in the reserved subjects. All the ultimate control was in the hands of the
viceroy and G.G. The act appeared to grant real power to the people of India, but in reality things
were a little different. Provincial governor also had special powers in the two reserved areas.
They had the authority to dismiss ministers and even the right to dismiss the whole
administration and rule by proclamation during a period of emergency. However the governors
were asked to act upon the advice of Ministers, which seemed to be very beneficial.
Another reason was that the part concerning the central Govt. was never introduced because the
princes rejected the new arrangements. Although the act appeared to give the Indians a say in
running their own country, there was a very limited franchise. The property qualification for
voting meant that only 25% of Indians population was allowed to vote in the provincial elections.
The act was opposed on all sides of India. The Congress, ML and even the princes of states
disliked and resented this act. Nehru called it a “charter of slavery’ and said that it had so many
safeguards that is was like ‘a machine with strong breaks but no engine’. To Jinnah it was simply
‘thoroughly rotten, fundamentally bad and totally unacceptable.
Help plzzz help ASAP
Answer:
The Proclamation only gave the Lincoln Administration the legal basis to free the slaves in the areas of the South that were still in rebellion on January 1, 1863. It effectively destroyed slavery as the Union armies advanced south and conquered the entire Confederacy.
Explanation:
Find The Missing Word
I need Help ASAP
The PowerFul Business owner brought Out her competition Untill She had a
Total ____ On the Industry
A: Monopoly
B: RedCoat
C: Revolution
Answer:
I think it would be monoploy
Which choice does not explain why the industrial revolution begin in Great Britain
Why did people use land subsidies?
to build barns for horses and hay
to build roads and railroads
to raise cattle on ranches
to grow tobacco
Describe an action taken by imperial nations in China that might have made the Chinese resist colonization. Then explain why that action might have led to resistance.
Please help ASAP, I'll give you Brainliest.
Answer:
In any event, preliminary attempts to Westernize Chinese society from within did not deter further foreign penetration; nor did the subsequent revolution (1911) succeed in freeing China from Western domination. Toward the end of the 19th century, under the impact of the new imperialism, the spread of foreign penetration accelerated. Germany entered a vigorous bid for its sphere of influence; Japan and Russia pushed forward their territorial claims; and U.S. commercial and financial penetration of the Pacific, with naval vessels patrolling Chinese rivers, was growing rapidly. But at the same time this mounting foreign interest also inhibited the outright partition of China. Any step by one of the powers toward outright partition or sizable enlargement of its sphere of influence met with strong opposition from other powers. This led eventually to the Open Door Policy, advocated by the United States, which limited or restricted exclusive privileges of any one power vis-à-vis the others. It became generally accepted after the antiforeign Boxer Rebellion (1900) in China. With the foreign armies that had been brought in to suppress the rebellion now stationed in North China, the danger to the continued existence of the Chinese government and the danger of war among the imperialist powers for their share of the country seemed greater than ever. Agreement on the Open Door Policy helped to retain both a compliant native government and equal opportunity for commerce, finance, and investme
One action that was taken by imperial nations in China was the sale of opium to the Chinese. This led to resistance as opium led to health and social consequences.
Opium in China The British and other nations smuggled opium into China to sell to the Chinese. Opium was abused by a lot of people and led to serious social and health ills.When the Chinese saw the effects of opium, they tried to ban it but the British went to war with China and defeated them and this allowed for more sales of opium. The Chinese hated the British was this and several revolts arose.
In conclusion, British sale of opium was resisted.
Find out more on the Opium wars at https://brainly.com/question/1265838.
what is secularism and explain in long
In 100 to 150 words, explain the political changes from Map 1 to Map 2.
Can someone help I can’t fail it
Answer: I think it is B.
Explanation:
What did the framers do to protect
individual rights?
Explanation:
The text of the Constitution reflects this vision. It defines our most fundamental freedoms in general terms: “freedom of speech,” “due process of law,” “free exercise” of religion, “equal protection of the laws,” “cruel and unusual punishment.” The Constitution sets forth governmental powers in similarly general terms: Congress may regulate “commerce… among the several states,” the president will “take care that the laws be faithfully executed,” the courts are authorized to decide “cases” and “controversies.”
According to our primary source document from The Crisis newspaper, what was the real reason behind Japanese internment, and what proof did they offer?
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Unfortunately, you did not attach the link to read the information about The Crisis newspaper, nor a link to it.
However, what we can do to help you is to answer based on or knowledge of the topic.
Some historians believe that the real reason behind Japanese internment was to free that large portions of land that was the property of Japanese Americans to create profit.
After the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor, Hawaii, President Franklin D. Roosevelt decided to enter World War II. One of the first actions after entering the war, Roosevelt signed the executive order 9066 that ordered the relocation of approximately 112,000 Japanese people living on the Pacific coast of the United States. They were sent to interim camps such as the one at Manzanares, California.
These people were removed from the Pacific US and few of them sold their private properties at a very cheap price, losing all their patrimony.
How does a republic contrast with a democracy
A democracy works under meeting and exercise the government in person, while a republic is the meeting and agreements of the citizens. They assemble and administrate to keep the discussion civil.
Answer:
See explanation
Explanation:
A republic is a form of government where supreme power is held by the people and their elected representatives whereas democracy is an ideology that helps shape how a government is run, describing a system run by the whole population or all the eligible members of a state, typically through elected representatives.
Describe the friendship of Don Quixote with Sancho Panza. How are they alike and how are they different from each other?
Answer:
The relationship between Don Quixote and Sancho Panza is an important one. Readers can easily understand that the two characters stand for different things. While Don Quixote represents illusion, Sancho Panza represents reality. They complement each other in a dualistic way.
"I was born in South Carolina. My grandfather was stolen from Africa. My father learned the African method of curing snake bites, and was in consequence, called Dr. Clavern. My mother's name was Betty. I had five brothers and five sisters. Of these, two brothers and two sisters were dead when I left the plantation. My earliest recollection was of my mistress, whom I feared above all persons, as she used every means in her power to spite me. The reason for this was as follows:-When I was about ten years old, I and her son were digging for hickory root to amuse ourselves with, when he, seeing that I was obtaining mine quicker than he, kicked me on the nose, upon which I wiped the blood upon him. He ran and informed his mother, who whipped me on my naked back, to console her son, till the blood ran down. After that, she always hated not only me but my family, and would even stint my mother's allowance; and since then, I had many whippings through her influence." -John Andrew Jackson, 1862 This passage was written by a slave from South Carolina. Based on the passage, which of the following statements is true?
A. The children of whites played as equals with the children of slaves.
B. Many slaves experienced harsh treatment at the hands of their masters.
C. Any slaves who came from Africa were treated better than slaves born in the Americas.
D. Slaves that worked in the house were paid a wage while field slaves were not.
Answer:
B or D
Explanation:
"C" can be eliminated since we can see African were not treated better then slaves born in Amercia since Andrew Jackson himself is African-American and was punished along withbhos family. And "A" we can be eliminated since we know that Andrew was punished for whipping blood on a white child after this child injured him.
"D" could be a *possible* elimination since it did not give insight into rather or not field slaves were paid.
However we so know that many slaves experiences harsh treatment at the hand of their master/mistress. So "B" is a possible answer
Which statement BEST describes one of the roles of William Few at the Constitutional Convention of 1787?
Explanation:
"William Few in the year 1787 of February was the signer of the Constitutional Convention.
He was born in 1748 in Maryland and later changed to Richmond County which is near Augusta in the year 1770.
1780 was the year when some became an actor on the high stage whereas Georgia sent him to the Continental Congress.
After that in the same year Georgia sent some and others to a Philadelphia convention charged with checking the Articles of Confederation that wasn't revise by the convention and it rewrote and resulted a full new charter—the United States Constitution."
Coffee is shown as coming from the "Old World". In fact it originally came
from the Sudan region of Africa. how
do you think the Europeans got hold of it?
Answer:
maybe they made their own or exchanged money or goods to get the coffee.
In your view, is it ever acceptable to commit acts of violence against people who are in positions of power?
Answer:
no
Explanation:
you never commit acts of violence against another person regardless of who it is.
WHO WERE THE “SANS-CULOTTES” AND WHAT WAS THEIR RELATIONSHIP TO THE “JACOBINS?”
Answer:
The sans-culottes were the common people of the lower classes in late 18th-century France, a great many of whom became radical and militant partisans of the French Revolution in response to their poor quality of life under the Ancien Régime.
Explanation:
Compare and contrast how Booker T. Washington and W.E.B Du Bois responded to discrimination. in a paragraph
PLZZ
Answer:
No account of Black history in America is complete without an examination of the rivalry between Booker T. Washington and W.E.B. Du Bois, which in the late 19th to early 20th centuries changed the course of the quest for equality in American society, and in the process helped give birth to the modern civil rights movement. Though Washington and Du Bois were born in the same era, both highly accomplished scholars and committed to the cause of civil rights for Black people in America, it was their differences in background and method that would have the greatest impact on the future.
Washington believed Black people should have economic independence
Born into slavery in Virginia in 1856, Washington’s early life and education did much to influence his later thinking. After the Civil War he worked in a salt mine and as a domestic for a white family and eventually attended the Hampton Institute, one of the first all-Black schools in America. After completing his education, he began teaching, and in 1881 he was selected to head the Tuskegee Normal and Industrial Institute in Alabama, a sort of vocational school that sought to give African Americans the necessary moral instruction and practical work skills to make them successful in the burgeoning Industrial Revolution.
Washington believed that it was economic independence and the ability to show themselves as productive members of society that would eventually lead Black people to true equality and that they should for the time being set aside any demands for civil rights. These ideas formed the essence of a speech he delivered to a mixed-race audience at the Cotton State and International Exposition in Atlanta in 1895. There and elsewhere, his ideas were readily accepted by both Black people who believed in the practical rationality of his approach, and white people who were more than happy to defer any real discussion of social and political equality for Black people to a later date. It was, however, referred to pejoratively as the “Atlanta Compromise” by its critics. And among them was Du Bois.
Born to a free Black family, Du Bois first experienced bigotry in college
Du Bois was born in 1868 in Great Barrington, Massachusetts, to a free Black family in a comparatively integrated community. He attended the local schools and excelled in his studies, eventually graduating as valedictorian of his class. However, when in 1885 he began attending Fisk University in Tennessee, he encountered for the first time the open bigotry and repression of the Jim Crow South, and the experience had a profound impact on his thinking. Du Bois returned to the North to further his education, with nothing less than equal rights for Black Americans being his ultimate goal. When he earned his Ph.D from Harvard University in 1895, he was the first Black man to have done so, and his dissertation, “The Suppression of the African Slave Trade to the United States of America, 1638–1870,” was one of the first academic works on the subject.
Explanation:
Hope you find your answer, hope it helps :)
What do you think artists depicted in the literature and art after ww1?
answer : The most famous post war movement in art and literature was Dadaism, or simply Dada, which existed from 1916 to 1924. It was created as a result of the horrific consequences of WWI.
Answer:
World War I was jarring in many ways. It was one of the largest, if not the largest, collective trauma the world had experienced up until that point. One thing it changed forever was traditional notions of Western art.
It was the first world war, and many young men entered it idealistic and left feeling completely disillusioned and hopeless. In the 1920s they became known as the "lost generation," a phrase coined by famed American author and WWI veteran Ernest Hemingway.
The end of WWI sparked the entrance of modern art into the spotlight in popular art. Surrealist and Expressionist painters began to emerge from various corners of the world, and art, rather than depicting a beautiful, perfect world, began to depict the struggles, chaos, and splinters of the world with distorted figures and mangled bodies. Picasso's "Guernica," which was actually a response to the bombing of Guernica during the Spanish Civil War, is an example of how WWI changed art forever.
Explanation:
hope I helped
What are some ways in which nationalism can help liberate people and bring about positive political change in this era? Can you predict any potential problems or challenges that nationalism might also bring? If so what are they?
Answer:
well some are social and political you can see now and past and in the future people will fail and you can learn from their mistakes.
Explanation:
hoped this made sense to you
The Supreme Court’s ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland, that federal law is superior to state law, directly influenced which case?
Answer:
They were afraid that Napoléon might change his mind and revoke the agreement. The Supreme Court's ruling in McCulloch v. Maryland, that federal law is superior to state law, directly influenced which case? declaring laws unconstitutional.
Explanation:
Hope it helps! Correct me if I am wrong :>
Im sure about my answer :>
Can you please mark me as brainlest?
Once the Shah left the country, who took over in his place?
How did they feel about America?
Reza Shah was deposed in 1941 by an invasion of allied British and Soviet troops who believed him to be sympathetic with the allies' enemy Nazi Germany. That being said, Americans are, on the whole, very friendly people and happy to help when asked.
Which of the following leaders negotiated a treaty in 1794 to end trade conflicts between the United States and Great Britain?
John Jay
Thomas Jefferson
Alexander Hamilton
George Washington
The correct option is A. John Jay a leader negotiated a treaty in 1794 to end trade conflicts between the United States and Great Britain.
The Jay Treaty, signed on November 19, 1794, was a pact that reduced tensions between the United States and Great Britain provided a solid foundation for the country's economy, and guaranteed its commercial prosperity.
Who opposed the Jay Treaty?Two future presidents, Thomas Jefferson and James Madison led the opposition to the treaty. Jefferson was transitioning from one political post to another at the time. He had just finished serving as Washington's secretary of state from 1789 to 1793, and he had not yet been appointed John Adams' vice president.
Jay and William Wyndham Grenville, the British Foreign Secretary, forged a deal that rewarded England's economic and military might. On November 19, 1794, Jay accepted a deal after realizing that America had limited options for negotiation. Before Washington got a copy, there was a wait of almost four months.
Thus, The right response is option A. In order to put an end to trade disputes between the United States and Great Britain, John Jay, a leader, negotiated a treaty in 1794.
Learn more about Jay Treaty here:
https://brainly.com/question/2762507
#SPJ2
And it is further enacted by the authority aforesaid, that no goods or commodities (no sugars, tobacco, cotton-wool, indigoes, ginger, fustic, or other dyeing wood, of the growth, production, or manufacture of any English plantations in America, Asia, or Africa, shall be shipped, carried, conveyed, or transported from any of the said English plantations to any land, island, territory, dominion, port, or place whatsoever, other than to such other English plantations as do belong to his Majesty)…
...whatsoever, of the growth, production or manufacture of Africa, Asia, or America, or of any part thereof, be imported into England...in any other ship or ships, vessel or vessels whatsoever, but in such as do truly and without fraud belong only to the people of England...or of the lands, islands, plantations or territories in Asia, Africa, or America, to his Majesty belonging, as the proprietors and right owners thereof, and whereof the master, and three fourths at least of the mariners are English; (2) under the penalty of the forfeiture of all such goods and commodities, and of the ship or vessel in which they were imported, with all her guns, tackle, furniture, ammunition, and apparel;
The Navigation Act of 1660
1) What is the main idea of the above law?
Answer
The banning of drugs
Explanation:
How did the Industrial Revolution affect the power of aristocracy, or noble class?
a. Their power decreased as a new middle class of factory owners and managers grew in wealth and power.
b. Their power increased due to their ability to control when and where factories were built.
c. Their power stayed basically the same since they were the same people who owned most of the factories.
d. Their power increased because they were able to loan money to people who wanted to build factories.
Answer: answer is c
Explanation:
The answer is C. Explanation: The aristocrats and noble held power because they were the wealthiest in a society and passed that down through generation and kept this power in closed circles. This would ensure their control and reduce the possibility of competition for power.
Answer:
D
Explanation:
Why does Orwell object to the Burmese’s prejudice against him? In Shooting an Elephant?
Answer:
Orwell objects to the Burmese prejudice against him because he's rlly against the fact of British imperialism, which is power to rule over another country and extended :3
Explanation:
:3