Determine if (-1, 4) is a solution to y < - 3x + 2. If so, graph the inequality.

Answer:  the answer is A. 14.

Step-by-step explanation: In each trial of the reenactment, Scott chooses one card from the stack and records its digit. Based on the given data, a digit of or 1 speaks to a objective scored, and a digit of 2 through 9 speaks to a missed endeavor.

Out of the 5 endeavors per amusement, on the off chance that Scott scores precisely 2 objectives, it implies he missed 3 endeavors. Subsequently, the likelihood of this occasion can be calculated as:

P(exactly 2 objectives) = (0.2)²(0.8)³ = 0.008192

This likelihood can be utilized to discover the anticipated number of diversions in which Scott scores precisely 2 objectives, by duplicating it by the overall number of diversions reenacted:

Anticipated number of recreations = P(exactly 2 objectives) × Add up to number of recreations = 0.008192 × 84 ≈ 0.68

Adjusting to the closest entire number, we get that Scott is anticipated to score precisely 2 objectives in 1 diversion out of the 84 recreated diversions.

The answer is A. Evaluation researchers encounter more logistical problems than other researchers because evaluation research occurs in the context of real life.

Evaluation research often takes place in real-world settings, which can present logistical challenges such as accessing participants, coordinating schedules, and dealing with unexpected events. Additionally, evaluation research often involves multiple stakeholders and requires collaboration and communication among various groups, which can further complicate logistical issues. While evaluation research may also involve longer timelines, higher costs, measurement problems, and examination of multiple variables, these factors do not necessarily contribute to greater logistical challenges.

This means that evaluation researchers have to navigate complex, real-world situations, adapt to unforeseen challenges, and work with various stakeholders, making the research process more logistically challenging compared to controlled laboratory settings or theoretical research.

to learn more about theoretical research. click here:

https://brainly.com/question/29220441

#SPJ11

Evaluation research is a type of research that focuses on assessing the effectiveness, efficiency, and impact of programs, policies, or interventions in real-life settings.

The correct answer is A. occurs in the context of real life.

This often involves evaluating the outcomes and impacts of interventions in complex and dynamic environments, such as organizations, communities, or systems. As a result, evaluation researchers may encounter more logistical problems compared to other types of researchers because they need to navigate real-life contexts, deal with multiple stakeholders, collect data from diverse sources, and address issues such as ethics, confidentiality, and validity in the evaluation process. Logistical problems may include challenges related to data collection, measurement, sample selection, data quality, and managing time and resources.

Learn more about “ Logistical problems “ visit here;

https://brainly.com/question/31087596

#SPJ4

The only ball that weighs 30g is ball A. So the answer is: Ball A weighs 30g.

To determine which ball weighs 30g, we need to compare the weights of each ball.

We know that there are five balls, and that their weights are 30g, 50g, 50g, 50g, and 80g.

Since we are looking for the ball that weighs 30g, we can eliminate the other weights one by one. We know that ball E weighs 80g, so it cannot be the one we're looking for. We can also eliminate balls B, C, and D since they all weigh 50g.

Therefore, the only ball that weighs 30g is ball A. So the answer is: Ball A weighs 30g.

Learn more about weigh at https://brainly.com/question/25973294

#SPJ1

Answer:√2/2

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's label the sides of the right triangle as follows:

The side adjacent to the angle θ (cosine is adjacent/hypotenuse): 6

The hypotenuse (the longest side): 6√2

The side opposite to the angle θ (sine is opposite/hypotenuse): 6√3

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we can find the length of the missing side:

a² + b² = c²

6² + (6√3)² = (6√2)²

36 + 108 = 72

144 = 72

√144 = √72

12 = 6√2

Now that we know the length of all three sides, we can use the cosine ratio to find the value of cos(θ):

cos(θ) = adjacent/hypotenuse = 6/6√2 = √2/2

Therefore, the value of cos(θ) in the right triangle with sides of 6, 6√2, and 6√3 is √2/2.

Answer: 1/2 ( aka 50%) but the answer is 1/2

The solution to the given system of equations is x = -3 and y = 4 or (-3,4)

Now, for given problem

2x + 5y = 14 ................(1)

4x + 2y = -4 ................(2)

Multiply equation (1) by '2' and equation (2) by '-1' :

4x + 10y = 28 ................(3)

-4x - 2y = 4 ..................(4)

Adding equations (3) and (4) to eliminate 'x':

4x + 10y + (-4x) - 2y = 28 + (4)

8y = 32

y = 32 / 8

y = 4

on substituting the value (y = 4) into equation (1), we get :

2x + 5(4) = 14

2x + 20 = 14

2x = 14 - 20

2x = -6

x = (-3)

Hence, solution for the given system of equations is (-3,4).

Learn more about system of equations here:

https://brainly.com/question/12895249

#SPJ1

Answer:

[tex] \frac{ {g}^{4} {h}^{2} }{ g{h}^{6} } = \frac{ {g}^{3} }{ {h}^{4} } [/tex]

because other values are 1, and this one is less, because g<h

Answer: 4545 yards

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use similar triangles to solve this problem. Let's represent the height of the flagpole with the variable "x".

Using the triangle formed by Carla's line of sight, the height of the apartment building, and the top of the flagpole, we can set up the following proportion:

x / (x + 1515) = 15 / 20

Simplifying this proportion, we get:

4x = 3(x + 1515)

4x = 3x + 4545

x = 4545

Therefore, the height of the flagpole is 4545 yards.

Answer: second one!

Step-by-step explanation:

The coin makes approximately 16.53 turns when rolled on its edge for 1.34 m.

The circumference of the coin can be calculated as follows to determine the number of turns it makes:

C = πd

where C is the circumference, d is the diameter, and π is the mathematical constant pi (approximately equal to 3.14159).

So, for the given $2 coin with a diameter of 25.75 mm, the circumference is:

C = πd = 3.14159 x 25.75 mm ≈ 80.926 mm

Divide the distance traveled by the coin's circumference to determine the number of turns it makes when rolled on its edge for 1.34 meter:

Number of turns = distance traveled / circumference of the coin

Number of turns = 1.34 m / 0.080926 m

Number of turns ≈ 16.53

Therefore, the coin makes approximately 16.53 turns when rolled on its edge for 1.34 m.

know more about circumference visit :

https://brainly.com/question/28757341

#SPJ1

Answer:

0.71 weeks

Step-by-step explanation:

To convert 5 days to weeks, we can use the conversion factor:

1 week = 7 days

Therefore, we have:

5 days = 5/7 weeks

Rounding to the nearest hundredth, we get:

5 days ≈ 0.71 weeks

Therefore, 5 days is approximately equal to 0.71 weeks.

As likely as not (assuming the bag contains an equal number of magnets for each letter in the alphabet).

Probability is a measure of the likelihood or chance that a particular event will occur. It is expressed as a number between 0 and 1, with 0 indicating that the event is impossible and 1 indicating that the event is certain to occur.

In probability theory, the probability of an event is calculated by dividing the number of ways that the event can occur by the total number of possible outcomes. This is known as the probability formula:

probability = Number of favorable outcomes / Total number of possible outcomes

Probability is used in a wide range of fields, including statistics, finance, physics, and engineering, to model and analyze uncertain situations and make predictions.

B. Likely (assuming the bag contains an equal number of magnets for each letter in the alphabet, and that there are more consonants than vowels in the alphabet).

C. Unlikely (assuming the deck contains an equal number of red and black cards).

D. Impossible (assuming the deck contains only standard playing cards with 52 cards, including 13 cards for each of the four suits).

E. Unlikely (assuming the deck contains only standard playing cards with 52 cards, including 4 cards for each number or face value).

To learn more about probability, visit

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ1

Answer:

5x

6xy

2x3y

hope it's helpful

a) Any value outside of Q1 - 1.5(IQR) and Q3 + 1.5(IQR) can be considered a potential outlier.

b) This will give us a visual representation of the distribution of income among the full-time students.

c) It is important to analyze outliers carefully to ensure that they are not artificially skewing the results of our analysis.

(a) To check for outliers in the data set, we can use the box-and-whisker plot or the z-score method. However, since we do not have the exact data, we cannot use these methods. One way to identify potential outliers is to calculate the quartiles (Q1, Q2, and Q3) and the interquartile range (IQR).

(b) To draw a histogram of the data, we can use the frequency distribution table given in the question. The x-axis should represent the income ranges (e.g. $0-$100, $100-$200, etc.) and the y-axis should represent the frequency (i.e. the number of students who earned income within each range).

(c) If there are any outliers in the data set, we need to investigate them further to determine the reason for their unusual values. Possible reasons for outliers could be data entry errors, extreme values due to high- or low-income jobs, or unique situations such as unexpected windfalls or emergencies.

To learn more about frequency distribution visit;

https://brainly.com/question/14926605

#SPJ11

The probability that more than 7 of the invoices will be paid within ten working days is 0.8281

This is a binomial distribution problem where:

n = 10 (sample size)

p = 0.5 (probability of success, i.e., an invoice being paid within ten working days)

We need to find the probability of getting more than 7 invoices paid within ten working days, i.e., P(X > 7), where X is the number of invoices paid within ten working days.

Using the binomial probability formula, we get:

[tex]P(X > 7) = 1 - P(X ≤ 7)[/tex]

=[tex]1 - ∑(i=0 to 7) [nCi * p^i * (1-p)^{(n-i)][/tex]

where nCi is the number of ways to choose i items from n items, given by [tex]nCi = n! / (i! * (n-i)!).[/tex]

Calculating the above expression, we get:

[tex]P(X > 7) = 1 - [10C0 * 0.5^0 * 0.5^10 + 10C1 * 0.5^1 * 0.5^9 + ... + 10C7 * 0.5^7 * 0.5^3][/tex]

[tex]= 1 - 0.1719[/tex]

[tex]= 0.8281[/tex]

for such more questions binomial distribution

https://brainly.com/question/24756209

#SPJ11

Estimate the mean number of travel days per year for salespeople employed by three hardware distributors with a 0.90 degree of confidence and an error margin of 2 days, a sample size of at least 179 salespeople should be selected.

The sample size needed to estimate the population mean with a 0.90 degree of confidence:

[tex]n = (Z\times\sigma / E)^2[/tex]

where:

Z = the Z-score for the desired level of confidence (0.90 corresponds to a Z-score of 1.645)

σ = the population standard deviation (unknown)

E = the maximum error of the estimate, which is given as 2 days

We can estimate the population standard deviation using the sample standard deviation from the pilot study, which is given as 16 days.

Therefore, plugging in the values, we get:

[tex]n = (1.645 \times 16 / 2)^2 = 178.26[/tex]

Rounding up to the nearest whole number, we get a minimum sample size of 179 salespeople.

For similar questions on Mean

https://brainly.com/question/20118982

#SPJ11

Froph can purchase 2 naxvips and 1 dubble with a maximum budget of $6.

How to solve the question?

Part 1:

Let's assume Froph purchased "x" naxvips and "y" dubbles. The cost of each naxvip and dubble is $2. Therefore, the total cost of purchasing "x" naxvips and "y" dubbles can be calculated as:

2x + 2y <= 6

This inequality can be simplified by dividing both sides by 2:

x + y <= 3

This is the standard form of the inequality that models the relationship between the number of naxvips and dubbles Froph can purchase with a maximum budget of $6.

Part 2:

One possible pair of numbers that satisfies the inequality is (2, 1). If Froph purchases 2 naxvips and 1 dubble, the total cost would be:

2 x $2 + 1 x $2 = $6

This pair of numbers satisfies the inequality since:

2 + 1 = 3 <= 3

Therefore, Froph can purchase 2 naxvips and 1 dubble with a maximum budget of $6.

To know more about inequalities visit :-

https://brainly.com/question/25275758

#SPJ1

The monthly interest rate is the annual interest rate divided by 12

To calculate the monthly interest rate, we need to divide the annual interest rate by 12 (since there are 12 months in a year).

So if the annual interest rate is 8%, the monthly interest rate can be calculated as:

Monthly interest rate = Annual interest rate / 12

Monthly interest rate = 8% / 12

Monthly interest rate = 0.6667%

Therefore, the monthly interest rate would be 0.6667%.

Read more about interest at

https://brainly.com/question/24924853

#SPJ1

True.  

The decision that would result from a Type I error is:

Closing the park when the lead levels are within the allowed limit. C

In this scenario, the null hypothesis is that the lead levels are okay, and the alternative hypothesis (Ha) is that lead levels exceed the limit.

The decisions that would result from the Type I error are:

Closing the park when the lead levels are in excess of the allowed limit.

This decision would be a false positive, as the park would be closed even though the lead levels are actually within the allowed limit.

This is a Type I error.

Closing the park when the lead levels are within the allowed limit.

This decision would be a correct decision as the park should be closed if the lead levels are not within the allowed limit.

This is not a Type I error.

Keeping the park open when the lead levels are in excess of the allowed limit.

This decision would be a false negative, as the park would remain open even though the lead levels are actually above the allowed limit.

This is a Type II error.

Closing the park because of the increased noise level in the neighborhood.

This decision is not related to the hypothesis testing for lead levels in the park, and therefore, it is not a Type I error.

For similar questions on Error

https://brainly.com/question/28771966

#SPJ11

76.74 milligrams will remain after 32 hours.

N(t) = N₀e^(-kt)

where:

N(t) is the amount of substance remaining after time t

N₀ is the initial amount of substance

k is the decay constant

To solve for the decay constant, use the information given in the problem:

100 = 200e^(-22k)

Dividing both sides by 200, we get:

0.5 = e^(-22k)

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

ln(0.5) = -22k

Solving for k, we get:

k = ln(0.5)/(-22) = 0.0316

Use this value of k to find the amount of substance remaining after 32 hours:

N(32) = 200e^(-0.0316*32) = 76.74 mg

Therefore, approximately 76.74 milligrams of the substance will remain after 32 hours.

Learn more about radioactive decay, here:

https://brainly.com/question/1770619

#SPJ1

76.4 milligrams will remain after 32 hours.

Exponential refers to a mathematical function in which a constant base is raised to a variable exponent. The value of the function increases or decreases rapidly as the exponent increases, depending on whether the base is greater than 1 or between 0 and 1. Exponential functions are commonly used to model situations where a quantity grows or decays at a constant percentage rate over time.

Decay is the natural process of deterioration or rotting of a substance over time. It can occur in both organic and inorganic materials and is often caused by the activity of microorganisms, exposure to oxygen or other environmental factors.

To determine the amount of radioactive substance that remains after 32 hours, we can use the formula A = A₀ ×[tex]e^{-kt}[/tex], where A is the amount remaining, A₀ is the initial amount, k is the decay constant, and t is the time elapsed.

we can use the same formula for exponential decay to find the value of k:

100 = 200 × [tex]e^{(-k*22)}[/tex]

0.5 = [tex]e^{(-k*22)}[/tex]

ln(0.5) = -k×22

k = ln(2)/(22)

Now we can use this value of k to find the amount of substance remaining after 32 hours:

N(32) = 200 [tex]e^{(-k*32)}[/tex]

N(32) = 200 [tex]e^{(-(ln(2)/(22))32)}[/tex]

N(32) ≈ 76.4 mg

Therefore, approximately 76.4 milligrams of the substance will remain after 32 hours.

Learn more about function here:

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ1

The bigger engine is larger than the smaller one by 235.4724 cubic centimeters.

We know that 1 inch=2.54 centimeters

Then 1 cubic inches-(2.54)^3 cubic centimeters

We have that:

⇒ 1 cubic inches=(2.54)3 = 16.3870 cubic centimeters

⇒350 cubic inches= 350 x 16.3870 = 5735.4724 cubic centimeters

Since, the other displaces 5,500 cubic centimeters  and 5735.4724< 5500. The difference between them is:

= 5735.4724 - 5500

= 235.4724

Hence, the bigger engine larger than the smaller one by 235.4724 cubic centimeters.

Read more about Engine size

brainly.com/question/14439953

#SPJ1

These investments do indeed produce a net return of $133.

What is algebra?

Algebra is a branch of mathematics that deals with mathematical operations and symbols used to represent numbers and quantities in equations and formulas.

Let's call the amount Devon invested in the real estate fund "x". Then, we know that the amount invested in the large cap stock fund is twice that, or "2x". The total amount invested is $9500, so we can write:

x + 2x + y = 9500

where "y" is the amount invested in the bond fund.

We also know the returns of each fund, so we can calculate the total return on the investments:

0.047(2x) - 0.122x + 0.054y = 133

Simplifying this equation, we get:

0.998x + 0.054y = 133

We have two equations and two unknowns (x and y), so we can solve for them. Let's start by solving the first equation for y:

y = 9500 - 3x

Now we can substitute this expression for y into the second equation:

0.998x + 0.054(9500 - 3x) = 133

Simplifying and solving for x, we get:

0.888x = 459.8

x = 517.57

So Devon invested $517.57 in the real estate fund. The amount invested in the large cap stock fund is twice that, or $1035.14. The amount invested in the bond fund is:

y = 9500 - 3x = 8464.29

To check that these investments produce a net return of $133, we can calculate the total return on each investment and add them up:

0.047(2x) - 0.122x + 0.054y = 0.047(2517.57) - 0.122517.57 + 0.054*8464.29 = 133.00

So these investments do indeed produce a net return of $133.

To learn more about algebra from the given link:

https://brainly.com/question/24875240

#SPJ1

Answer:

The amplitude is 1/2, the period is 2π/4 = π/2, and the phase shift is π/2.

Step-by-step explanation:

The given function is:

f(t) = -1/2(4t - 2π)

We can rewrite this function in the form:

f(t) = A cos(B(t - C)) + D

where A is the amplitude, B is the period, C is the phase shift, and D is the vertical shift.

Comparing this with the given function, we can see that:

A = 1/2

B = 4

C = π/2

D = 0

Therefore, the amplitude is 1/2, the period is 2π/4 = π/2, and the phase shift is π/2.

Note that the negative sign in front of the function does not affect the amplitude, period, or phase shift. It simply reflects the function across the x-axis.

The probability that the point is in the smaller, shaded square is approximately 14.06%.

Probability is the measure of the likelihood or chance of an event occurring. It is a number between 0 and 1, where 0 indicates that the event will not occur and 1 indicates that the event will certainly occur. The probability of an event is calculated as the number of favorable outcomes divided by the total number of possible outcomes. Probability is widely used in various fields, including mathematics, statistics, science, finance, and engineering.

The area of the large square is (8 cm)² = 64 cm², and the area of the shaded square is (3 cm)² = 9 cm². The probability of choosing a point at random that is in the shaded square is equal to the ratio of the area of the shaded square to the area of the large square:

Probability = (area of shaded square) / (area of large square)

Probability = 9 cm² / 64 cm²

Probability = 0.140625 or 14.06% (rounded to two decimal places)

Therefore, the probability that the point is in the smaller, shaded square is approximately 14.06%.

To know more about the probability visit:

brainly.com/question/29221515

#SPJ1

The total number of non-empty subsets s of[tex]{1, 2, 3, . . . , 8}[/tex] such that the product of the elements of s is at most 200 is:
[tex]255 - (127 + 63 + 31) + 2 = 36.[/tex]
So, there are 36 such subsets.

Number of non-empty subsets s of[tex]{1, 2, 3, . . . , 8}[/tex] such that the product of the elements of s is at most 200, we can use a method called inclusion-exclusion principle.
First, we need to count the total number of non-empty subsets of the given set.

Since each element can either be included or excluded, there are [tex]2^8 - 1 = 255[/tex] non-empty subsets.
Next, we need to count the number of subsets whose product is greater than 200.

We can start by considering the subsets that contain 8, since 8 is the largest element in the set.

There are only two such subsets: {8} and {1, 8}.

Both of these subsets have a product greater than 200. Similarly, we can consider subsets that contain 7, and so on. We find that there are[tex]2^7 - 1 = 127[/tex] subsets that contain 7, and each of these subsets has a product greater than 200. Similarly, there are [tex]2^6 - 1 = 63[/tex] subsets that contain 6, and each of these subsets has a product greater than 200.
Double-counted the subsets that contain both 6 and 7, as well as those that contain both 6 and 8, and those that contain both 7 and 8.

Subtract the number of subsets that contain both 6 and 7, both 6 and 8, and both 7 and 8.

There are [tex]2^5 - 1 = 31[/tex] subsets that contain both 6 and 7, and each of these subsets has a product greater than 200.

Similarly, there are[tex]2^5 - 1 = 31[/tex] subsets that contain both 6 and 8, and each of these subsets has a product greater than 200.

Finally, there are [tex]2^5 - 1 = 31[/tex] subsets that contain both 7 and 8, and each of these subsets has a product greater than 200.
However, we have subtracted too much, since we have now excluded subsets that contain all three of 6, 7, and 8. There are only two such subsets: {6, 7, 8} and {1, 6, 7, 8}. Both of these subsets have a product greater than 200.

For similar questions on subsets

https://brainly.com/question/28705656

#SPJ11

To find the number of non-empty subsets s of {1, 2, 3, . . . , 8} such that the product of the elements of s is at most 200, we can use the concept of power set and combinatorics. By analyzing the pattern, we can determine that there are a total of 120 subsets whose product is at most 200.

To find the number of non-empty subsets s of the set {1, 2, 3, . . . , 8} such that the product of the elements of s is at most 200, we can use the concept of power set and combinatorics. The power set of a set is the set of all its subsets. We know that the number of elements in the power set of a set with n elements is 2n. In this case, we have 8 elements in the set, so the power set will have 28 = 256 subsets. However, we need to find the number of subsets with a product at most 200.

We can analyze the products of all subsets to determine the count.

By analyzing the pattern, we can determine that there are a total of 120 subsets whose product is at most 200. This can be calculated by summing the total number of subsets for each number of elements (1-element subsets + 2-element subsets + 3-element subsets + ... + 8-element subsets).

https://brainly.com/question/33319261

#SPJ12

Answer:x= -67 over 24

Step-by-step explanation:

9. The value of the land today, if the land was purchased for $3,500 in 1960, at the value increased at 3% per year is $22,532.7

A percentage increase is the ratio of the difference in the initial and current value of an item to the initial value, expressed as a percentage.

The year the land was purchased = 1960

The amount at which the land was purchased, P = $3,500

The percentage rate by which the value of the land increased, r = 3%

The value of the land today, A, can be found using the compound interest formula as follows;

Value of the land, A = P·(1 + r)ⁿ

Where;

n = The number of years = 2023 - 1960 = 63

Therefore; A = 3500 × (1 + 3/100)⁶³ ≈ 22532.7

The value of the land today is about $22,532.7

Learn more on compound interest for an investment here: https://brainly.com/question/30196895

#SPJ1

f(x) = N * 4^x  is an exponential function that represents the number of new participants of the challenge as a function of the day number, x.

We define our variables:

N: the total number of participants on Day 1 (including Aliyah, Kim, and Reese)

r: the constant ratio by which the number of participants grows each day

x: the number of days since Day 1

r = 4.

There are N participants on Day 1. Each of the N participants contacts 4 new participants on Day 2, resulting in a total of 4N participants.

Each of the 4N participants makes contact with 4 new participants on Day 3, resulting in a total of 4(4N) = 16N people. Since we can see that there are more participants every day, we can write:

f(x) = N * 4^x as an exponential function that represents the number of new participants of the challenge as a function of the day number, x.

Learn more about exponential function at:

https://brainly.com/question/2456547

#SPJ1

The length created by a central angle is 0.04 feet.

What is radius of circle?

The radius of a circle is the distance from the center of the circle to any point on the circle's edge. It is typically denoted by the letter "r" and is one of the fundamental measurements used to describe the geometry of a circle.

First, we need to convert the central angle from degrees to radians. Since there are 60 minutes in a degree, we can divide 18 by 60 to get the angle in degrees as a decimal,

18/60 = 0.3 degrees

Next, we convert this to radians by multiplying by π/180,

0.3 × π/180 ≈ 0.00524 radians

To find the length of the arc created by this central angle, we use the formula,

arc length = radius × central angle

So, for a circle of radius 8 feet and a central angle of 0.00524 radians, the arc length is arc length = 8 × 0.00524 ≈ 0.04192 feet

Rounded to the nearest hundredth, the length of the arc is approximately 0.04 feet.

Learn more about radius of the circle here,

https://brainly.com/question/28162977

#SPJ1

Sampled 200 delinquent credit card accounts instead of 100, the margin of error would decrease.

Sampled 200 delinquent credit card accounts, the margin of error for the sample mean at a 95% confidence level would be $80.164.

Smaller than the margin of error we found earlier for a sample size of 100.

The margin of error for the sample means at a 95% confidence level, we need to use the formula:
[tex]Margin of error = z\times (standard deviation / square root of sample size)[/tex]
[tex]z\times[/tex] is the z-score for the 95% confidence level, which is 1.96.
So, plugging in the given values, we get:
[tex]Margin of error = 1.96 \times  (578 / \sqrt 100)[/tex]
[tex]Margin of error = 1.96 \times 57.8[/tex]
Margin of error = 113.008
Therefore, the margin of error for the sample mean at a 95% confidence level is $113.008.
Repeated samples of 100 delinquent credit card accounts and computed the sample mean each time, we would expect the true population mean to be within $113.008 of our sample mean about 95% of the time.
The margin of error is inversely proportional to the square root of the sample size. So, as the sample size increases, the margin of error decreases.
To see this, let's plug in the new sample size into the margin of error formula:
[tex]Margin of error = 1.96 \times (578 / \sqrt 200)[/tex]
[tex]Margin of error = 1.96 \times 40.9[/tex]
Margin of error = 80.164

For similar questions on Margin

https://brainly.com/question/30404882

#SPJ11