Eurocentric approach of punishment is stereotypes to European countries while Africa correctional approach is based on interdependence.
What is correctional approach?They are ways or methods that have been implemented or use to to punish individual of an offense.
Correctional approach is usually determined by the environment or country.
Eurocentric approach of punishment is stereotypes to European countries where punishment are given differently and it gives a negative mindset while Africa correctional approach is based on culture where they believe individual depends on each other and as such are not stereotypes.
Therefore, Eurocentric approach of punishment is stereotypes to European countries while Africa correctional approach is based on interdependence.
Learn more punishment here,
https://brainly.com/question/1275830
Nora is a criminology student. she is tasked with explaining how society responds to an increase in crime. what theory is nora most likely focusing on?
a.
social pathology
b.
strain theory
c.
differential opportunity theory
d.
critical theory
Answer:
D. Critical Theory.
Explanation:
The theory which Nora is most likely focusing on is Critical Theory.
Answer:
critical theory
Explanation:
a philosophical approach to culture, and especially to literature, that seeks to confront the social, historical, and ideological forces and structures that produce and constrain it. The term is applied particularly to the work of the Frankfurt School.
What powers does the supreme court have in choosing cases
Answer:
interpret the meaning of a law, to decide whether a law is relevant to a particular set of facts, or to rule on how a law should be applied.
The power that supreme court have are to determine whether a law applies to a certain set of facts or to make a decision on how a law should be implemented.
What are the main functions of the Supreme Court?The Supreme Court's principal responsibility is to ensure independent, open, fair, and efficient dispute resolution in conformity with the federal and state constitutions and laws.
The Supreme Court hears cases in a variety of ways: A party who has lost a case before the Court of Appeals can ask for a review of the decision.
Thus, supreme court have powers like evaluating the law and the application of different laws.
For further information about the supreme court, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/12603347
#SPJ4
According to the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs), at any time, more than _______ Americans are missing; more than _______ unidentified human remains are found in America every year; and by a year after discovery, roughly _______ of these have still not been identified.
According to the U.S. Department of Justice’s (DOJ) National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs), at any time, more than 600,000 Americans are missing; more than 40,000 unidentified human remains are found in America every year; and by a year after discovery, roughly 30,000 of these have still not been identified.
National Missing and Unidentified Persons SystemThe National Missing and Unidentified Persons System (NamUs) is a national information clearinghouse and resource center for missing, unidentified, and unclaimed person cases across the United States. Watch the video introduction from Lucas Zarwell, Director, Office of Investigative and Forensic Services, NIJ to learn more
NamUs provides technology, forensic services, and investigative support to resolve missing person and unidentified remains cases.
learn more about National Missing and Unidentified Persons System: https://brainly.com/question/2405419
Definition and list three separation power
Answer:
The system of separation of powers divides the tasks of the state into three branches: legislative, executive and judicial. These tasks are assigned to different institutions in such a way that each of them can check the others.Explanation:
What are the 3 separation powers?
Why are you reading this?
You wake up at the apartments, walk out of the apartments and are held up at gunpoint by someone you don't know, what do you do?
I'm hoping that this is an open-ended or critical thinking question. If not, do not take this answer as critical thinking is what I'm getting at.
If I were to be held at gunpoint by someone I don't know after leaving an apartment, this is how I would react. First of all, I would remain calm and follow the instructions of whomever is harboring the gun. Then, I would survey my surroundings before anything proceeds; for example, if I am at an apartment, I would see if there were any people or cars nearby that I could signal to if I had a chance to catch this stranger off guard. Assuming I am alone, I would continue to follow all instructions and give the impression I will conform early on to increase my chances of getting away later on. I would try to get somewhere public if I could or use my cell or a nearby phone to call 911 if this person were to say, go to the restroom for 2 minutes, or something similar. If all else fails and I believe I am doomed to escape, I would make sure to do what I could that would end up prosecuting this person in the future. For example, I would try to hide my ID in the place so the police would know this is where I was killed or leave some trace of my DNA on the stranger or their belongings.
If I got up at the apartments and on my way out, I found myself at a gun point I would first try to remain calm myself and then try to taser him if that’s not possible contact 911 as early as possible by sneaking on my capturer. And will try to gain on his trust that I will be cooperative until cops arrive or else, I will try to find something to attack my capturer.
What must be your initial actions to be safe?Remain calmTry to have your IDs with you Call 911Cooperate with him Give him what he asks for, if that’s no very valuable to youWhat is a taser?Taser, short for Tom A. Swift Electric Rifle, is a handheld device that sends a 50,000-volt electric shock to incapacitate a person. The Taser fires two small darts that are connected to the gadget by thin cables and can travel up to 11 meters (35 feet). The darts can pierce clothing and deliver an electric shock to the victim once they make contact, disrupting the target's nervous system and causing temporary incapacitation. Because the Taser employs pressurized nitrogen to discharge the darts, it is not considered a firearm. A Taser can also be used as a stun gun by putting it on the target's body and inflicting an electric shock.
to know more about taser here,
https://brainly.com/question/27651583
#SPJ2
Question #7
Multiple Select
If you assert your rights under the Sixth Amendment, what are you asking? (Select all that apply.)
That you be protected from incriminating yourself.
U
That the court provide you with an attorney.
O
That the court needs a warrant to arrest you.
That you have a jury for your trial.
Question #8
Answer:
Explanation:
Question #7
Multiple Select
If you assert your rights under the Sixth Amendment, what are you asking? (Select all that apply.)
That you be protected from incriminating yourself.
U
That the court provide you with an attorney.
O
That the court needs a warrant to arrest you.
That you have a jury for your trial.
Question #8
Which of the following best describes the principle of Respect for Persons as described in the Belmont Report?
The principle of person as it is contained in the Belmont report says that individuals should be treated as autonomous agents.
What is the Belmont report?This was a report that was written by the center for the protection of people that are used for the sake of biomedical report.
This report is very important due to the fact that it has to do with ethics as well as the health of particpants.
Raed more on the Belmont report here: https://brainly.com/question/4351542
One of the most careless things a person
could do is to...
A) operate a motor vehicle while under
the influence of alcohol or other
drugs.
B) chew gum while driving.
C) activate a vehicle's turn signal.
D) make use of a one-way street.
Answer:
A operate a motor vehicle while under the influence of alcohol or other drugs
Explanation:
these substances can reduce the problem solving skills and reaction times of the driver, making the driver carless and a danger to everyone on the road
What issues forced the delegates to the constitutional convention to compromise? select two correct answers
Under what circumstances can a police officer search your car?.
Nora is a criminology student. she is tasked with explaining how society responds to an increase in crime. what theory is nora most likely focusing on?
a.
social pathology
b.
strain theory
c.
differential opportunity theory
d.
critical theory
Answer:
critical theory
Explanation:
a philosophical approach to culture, and especially to literature, that seeks to confront the social, historical, and ideological forces and structures that produce and constrain it. The term is applied particularly to the work of the Frankfurt School.
Also, I took the quiz.
How many votes does it take to impeach a supreme court justice.
Which courts are tribunals created by congress to handle specialized types of cases?
Answer:
Article one courts are tribunals created by the Congress to handle specialized types of cases, especially those that rise under the regulatory law of federal agencies. The decisions of Article one courts are generally reviewable in Article three courts.
Explanation:quizlet
Article one courts are tribunals established by Congress to handle certain sorts of matters, particularly those arising under federal agency regulation law. Article one court decisions are often reviewable in Article three courts.
What exactly are constitutional courts?A constitutional court is a high court that focuses on constitutional law. Its primary authority is to determine whether challenged laws are in fact unconstitutional, i.e. whether they violate constitutionally established norms, privileges, and freedoms, among other things.
For more information about constitutional courts refer to the link:https://brainly.com/question/1822517
#SPJ4
QUESTION 38
2 points
Save An
Limits that are placed on the extent and type of campaigning a judicial candidate may or may not engage in or the information
that can be discussed in a judicial campaign can be a disadvantage to electing a judge for office
A)True
B)False
The problem with labeling a whole group or race of people as predisposed to crime is that the majority are not criminals. The very fact that not all men with crooked noses became criminals would seem to disprove Lombroso’s theories outright. How did Konrad Lorenz attempt to explain the good behavior of some who Darwin taught were ‘less evolved’?
He said that when put in difficult circumstances, these inborn instincts would come out.
He said that those who came from less evolved races had no choice but to commit crime.
He said that by mixing the races, the crime rates would diminish.
He said that those who did not commit crime were evolving past their genetics.
Answer:
He said that those who came from less evolved races had no choice but to commit crime.
Explanation:
He claimed that these ingrained tendencies would manifest themselves under trying conditions. As a result, Option (A) is the right alternative.
Who is Konrad Lorenz?Konrad Zacharias Lorenz was an ornithologist, zoologist, and ethologist from Austria. Together with Nikolaas Tinbergen and Karl von Frisch, he was awarded the 1973 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine. He is frequently credited with helping to establish modern ethology or the study of animal behavior.
The nature of instinctual behavioral acts, in particular how such acts arise and the supply of neural energy for their performance, were the subject of Lorenz's early scientific contributions. He also looked into how a simultaneous activation of two or more animals' basic urges could result in behavior.
Hence, Option (A) is the right one.
Learn more about Konrad Lorenz, from:
brainly.com/question/6834123
#SPJ5
Failure to comply with the Florida insurance laws may result in your drivers license being suspended for up to how many years
Answer:
Your license can be suspended for up to three years.
When can a bill become a law without a presidential signature
In modern day terms, what determines the classification behind a white-collar crime?
A.
the profession of the victim
B.
the profession of the criminal
C.
the type of crime committed
D.
the area the crime was committed in
Answer:
"crime committed by a person of respectability and high social status in the course of his occupation."
Explanation:
List the advantages of unit management for staff members
Answer: Unit management enhances communication between staff and inmates, maintains regularity for employees and inmates alike, empowers decision-making at the front-line level, and increases direct supervision and monitoring of offenders.
Explanation: ye
Which step of the policy evaluation process would ask you to determine if a policy helps to ensure domestic tranquility?
a) identify the solution
b) assign value
c) identify ideals expressed
d) identify impacts
e) identify the problem
Answer:
E. Identity the problem.
Explanation:
To ensure domestic tranquility , one must identity the problem to process with.
Identifying the problem is the step of the policy evaluation process that would ask you to determine if a policy helps to ensure domestic tranquillity. Thus, option 'E' is the correct option.
What is the policy evaluation process?The logical procedure utilized to ascertain the discrepancy between what was conceived by the initial policy aims and what has actually been realized by the policy or program as executed forms the foundation for most models of policy assessment.
However, many other models concentrate their analysis on various goals, such as what the evaluation's true purpose is, what the evaluator's role in the process is, how broad or narrow the evaluation's scope should be, and how the evaluation should be organized and carried out, for instance, what measurement tools should be used to determine success or failure.
Types of Policy Evaluation: Process Evaluation
Analyze the reasons for a program or policy's present performance.Determine any issues.Create remedies for the issues.Enhance program performance by offering suggestions for how solutions should be put into practice and assessed afterwards.Learn more about the policy evaluation process, here:
https://brainly.com/question/28024313
#SPJ2
Which restriction does the U.S. government place on personal freedoms?
A. Personal freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.
B. Personal freedoms must serve the U.S. government.
C. Personal freedoms can cause harm only to people in the minority.
D. Personal freedoms must contribute to the common good.
Answer:
A. Personal Freedoms must not take away the freedom of others.
Explanation:
Personal freedoms can mean a ton of things, for example the 10 amendments, the bill of rights, the entire U.S Constitution.
the U.S Government decided a long time ago that it would become a superpower for democracy, which, is working, but if we consider what democracy means, what it stands as an ideology, you can say it means:
Freedom for All
You can say it's goal is to champion:
Equality For All
Going back to my first sentence, when you would like to define "Personal Freedoms" which is a vague term because it can mean almost anything, but when you look at the key word "Personal" which affects only yourself, and when it effects only yourself can it take away the freedoms of others? No.
The Idea of "Personal Freedoms" Serving the government sounds a bit Totalitarian, the freedom of a person couldn't necessarily serve the government, unless they know something we don't, but we don't have to worry about this right now, but when they say "Serving the Government" are they labelling us as, "slaves?" or "Servants?" I don't see this (B) being the answer either.
When they say said freedoms can cause harm to the minority population, which I assume is persons under the age of 18 which varies by state, what do they mean?
The Minority population being excluded & Included from certain guaranteed rights has long been debated by U.S Lawmakers, such as: the right to own a gun, (Second Amendment), the Right to own a house or drive or get a credit card and bank account, Lawmakers exclude the minority population from certain rights to protect them, because yes, this can harm them, driving, owning a gun, buying a house, getting a credit card, drinking, smoking, vaping, etc.
But Then again, these very well effect the adult population just as great as the minority population and it asked if Personal Freedoms only affect the minority population, so, this is wrong.
Lastly on to the notion that personal freedoms are REQUIRED to contribute to the common good, the common good is a vague term and can mean ANYTHING, from helping your old granny cross the street to giving to the homeless, although it's distinct definition is of affecting everyone, we can also shrink it, to one person for another, when we think about Personal Freedoms and Common Good they are just so different and Personal Freedoms don't even have to do with Common Good, unless your thinking of the civil rights protest and Women's right's protest and black lives matter and the LGBTQ+ Community, but what we have to understand is that these freedom's are guaranteed to everyone, and you are not required to use these freedoms granted to you for the common good.
That is all young one, I see you'll have a bright future as a lawyer or judge someday and If your still confused, I'm accepting comments.
- I wish for my name to not be revealed, Criminal Defense Attorney-at-Law PhD & Yale Graduate with Highest Honors.
Question 28: There is an old saying that it’s better for 100 guilty people to go free than for an innocent person to be unjustly punished. Do you agree? Why or why? What do you think is the right balance for our society to strike?
Answer:
I think that that is correct
Explanation:
because pitting an innocent person away would do nothing. The person that actually did it might do something bad again and then that person that they blamed are in there for nothing.
What are the 3 principles intentional peer support?
Intentional Peer Support offers a powerful paradigm for developing partnerships in which both parties learn and grow together.
Three Fundamental Principles:
1. Growing and learning. We embark on a journey of self-discovery and growth. We learn alongside and from one another. We value and investigate our diverse experiences. We see differences as chances to learn and grow.
2. Concern for the Relationship We cultivate our ability to share and connect. We provide decency and respect. We listen in order to truly hear each other. We seek strategies to remain in a relationship even when we are uncomfortable.
3. Relationships are founded on hope. As humans, we come into contact with one another. We are optimistic and open to new opportunities. Over time, we gain trust. We muster the bravery to try new things as a group.
What exactly is Intention Peer Support?
Intentional Peer Support: An Alternative Approach is a cutting-edge curriculum that investigates how to build mutually supportive relationships. It includes appendices with information for peer support hotlines, peer-run respite programs, and peers working in the mental health system.
For more information about Intention Peer Support refer to the link:
https://brainly.com/question/27106154
#SPJ4
Why was the bill of rights written after the us constitution
4. How are interviews and interrogations distinguished from each other?
Answer:
The goal of an interview is usually to get a job and have very reasonable and formal questions about one's expertise, such as why should we let you in on this job or what is your level of experience in this area of expertise. However, it can also be to film a documentary or get to know somebody better, and both are conducted by people who have interviewed people many times. Interrogations are also formal and performed by experts, but they are usually strict and operated as a punishment or asking questions with the consequence of a penalty if answered suspiciously or incorrectly.
Jack and Jill Forensics Style
Answer the following questions based on information in the Crime Scene S.P.O.T.
1. Identify several key pieces of evidence within the story. How were they useful to investigators?
2. What evidence in the story is class evidence and what evidence is individual? Explain.
3. How can Locard's exchange principle help investigate in this case?
4. Choose a fairy tale or nursery rhyme story as the basis for your own forensic story. Be sure to include details about evidence. In 5-7 sentences, choose 1 popular fairytale (give the title and state the evidence etc…)
I add the information!!!
The several key pieces of evidence within the story are:
The crushed grass.The boulder with blood.The red sweater matched the one found in Jill's room.These were useful to investigators because they helped them to reconstruct the crime scene, understand the motive and nab the killer.
The class evidence in this story is the pail atop the hill and the individual evidence was the red sweater.
What is Forensics?This refers to the scientific tests which are carried out usually at a crime scene to get more information about the nature of the crime and the perpetrator(s).
Read more about crime scenes here:
https://brainly.com/question/19238665
What do ordinary life insurance and limited payment life insurance have in common? A. They pay a sum upon a person's death. B. They terminate after a certain number of years. C. They can be paid out at maturity. D. The premiums are paid indefinitely
Select the best definition of civil liberties
The foundations of civil liberties: select the best answer from the choices provided.
A. Rights that are guaranteed by law.
B. Affirmative measures taken by the government to protect a group or class of citizens.
C. Rights that protect defendants during criminal proceedings.
D. Right of citizens involved in civil trails.
Answer:
c
Explanation:
liberty is something to protect
how do poverty affect right to education ?
Answer:
Poor people typically don't have enough money to educate their children very well. They might not have enough experience to go to a good college or a university, or any at all. This all means that unless they got a scholarship or something, they don't have much education and limited education rights.