Answer:
Exclusionary Rule.
Explanation:
The exclusionary rule is a legal rule of the constitution that prevents any illegal search and seizure of 'evidence' that is collected in violation of the Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution. It also prevents the presentation of such 'evidence' in a court of law.
This rule also states that any evidence collected in violation of the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA) may not be admissible in a court of law as legal evidence as it is 'seized' in violation of the person's constitutional rights. The Fourth Amendment of the U. S. Constitution prevents the government from doing any search or seizure of 'evidence' of a person's home without due reasonable reason. Thus, it prevents a person's from being forcefully searched. So, when such searches are done and evidence produced before the court, they are not admissible under the exclusionary rule.
Who will become the next president and how do you know that will happen?
Answer ; the next us president will be the candidate who reaches 270 electoral vote different numder of electoral vote ; the large the punctuation of a state the more electoral vote it received
all electoral vote of a state are given to the candidate who receives majority of the vote
hope this help ples give 1000k follower an like an heart am a helper plesss
Theresa is the manager of Ascot Bank, a locally bank in her hometown. In addition to managing relationships with her employees and local customers, she has a good relationship with the bank examiner who frequently visits the bank to look at the accounts. The examiner ensures that Theresa’s bank is not making too many or too few loans and is keeping the right amount of cash reserves in the bank vault. The examiner also wants to make sure that the computers that link her bank with the central bank are functioning properly so the bank deposits people’s checks into the proper accounts worldwide. The computer also informs her of any changes in the interest rate the Federal Reserve sets. What interactions do you see between the local bank and the Federal Reserve?
Answer:
In this case, the local bank will be responsible for any and all policies that the Federal Reserve establishes in relation to cash reserves, as well as in relation to the activities of check release procedures and the interest rates that accompany them.
Explanation:
In the case shown in the question above, it is necessary for Theresa to inquire and know what interactions are needed between the local bank and the Federal Reserve must be established in order for her plans to work out. When looking for information, Theresa will see that the local bank must comply with all policies, guidelines and rules that the Federal Reverses establishes on cash reserves, the release of checks and interest rates related to these activities.
Answer:
The local bank must comply with Federal Reserve policies regarding cash reserves, check-clearing procedures, and setting interest rates.
Explanation:
from plato
5. Even though most people finding the burning of the American flag objectionable, it is protected under the First Amendment. Why should the right to so such a thing be protected? Explain.
Answer:
This is a very controversial topic, The First Amendment states that we are given the freedom of expression, Some say that the Burning of the American flag is considered as expressing yourself, and thus, should be protected. This was written in Texas V.S. Johnson, which based their opinion on the opinion of the cases Stromberg v California, and Tinker v Des Moines, which showed t that non-verbal expression was still protected under the 1st amendment.
which of the following individual freedoms is protected under the bill of rights
Answer: the right to equal protection under the law
Explanation:
this is the only answer choice that is valid in the Bill of rights
A federal statute designed to stop organized crime enumerated certain activities as crimes and provided that, in addition to charging these activities as the crimes they constitute, the activities would also constitute the criminal act of intentional furtherance of the goals of organized crime. Among the enumerated activities was the interstate distribution of cocaine. The statute’s constitutionality has been upheld by the Supreme Court. The defendant was arrested by federal agents after having driven a truck containing cocaine from Florida to Illinois, where he delivered his illicit cargo as directed. At trial, the defendant is convicted of interstate distribution of cocaine in violation of federal law, and convicted of a violation of the federal statute above. How may the defendant be sentenced?
Answer:
Under both statutes.
Explanation:
The meeting shown in the question above managed to violate two statutes, according to the statute developed to combat organized crime, in addition to violating the study that prohibits interstate drug transport. In that case, the convict must be tried for two infractions in different statutes and if convicted he must be convicted based on the guidelines of the two statutes.