In the late 1800's, economic, political, and religious motives prompted these nations to expand their influence over other regions, each with a goal to increase their power across the globe. The Industrial Revolution of the 1800's created a need for natural resources to fuel newly invented machinery and transportation.
50 Explain why the process of industrialisation brought about Social transformation I dramatic during the the lots Century.
Answer:
hope it helps :)
Explanation:
The process of industrialization brought about a dramatic social transformation during the 19th century because it fundamentally changed the way people lived and worked. Before the Industrial Revolution, most people lived in small rural communities and engaged in agricultural or craft-based activities.
.Due to the difficulties of passing immigration reform through a Republican-controlled Congress, President Obama chose to issue the executive order "Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA)" as a means of protecting the immigrant children who have grown up in the United States After repeated efforts to get additional funding for a new wall along the U.S.-Mexico border from the Democrat-controlled House of Representatives failed, President Trump finally issued the executive order: "Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements" as a means of using existing federal funds to begin building the wall. What do both of these scenarios demonstrate about why presidents use executive orders?
Answer:
President Obama proposed improving legal immigration processes, strengthening border security, deporting people convicted of a felony, expanding the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) program, and creating the Deferred Action for Parents of U.S. Citizens and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) program. DACA and DAPA were the most controversial elements of the president's plan with Republican critics, including Texas Governor Greg Abbott and Sen. Mike Lee (Utah), saying that the programs were a form of amnesty.[8] President Obama responded to these criticisms, saying, "I know some of the critics of this action call it amnesty. Well, it’s not. Amnesty is the immigration system we have today – millions of people who live here without paying their taxes or playing by the rules, while politicians use the issue to scare people and whip up votes at election time."[7]
Texas and the 25 states that brought a lawsuit against the Obama administration argued that President Obama did not have the authority to implement DAPA because it was essentially a new law. The brief submitted to the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of Texas and the states argued that "DAPA is a crucial change in the Nation’s immigration law and policy—and that is precisely why it could be created only by Congress, rather than unilaterally imposed by the Executive.
The Obama administration argued that the president's actions were legal because Congress had given the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) the ability to administer and enforce immigration laws under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA). The DHS secretary had the authority to decide whom to deport and whom to grant deferred action to under the INA, and "Congress has repeatedly recognized" this ability in other legislation. The United States government argued that the ruling of the appeals court, which stated that DAPA could not be implemented, "will allow States to frustrate the federal government’s enforcement of the Nation’s immigration laws. It will force millions of people—who are not removal priorities under criteria the court conceded are valid, and who are parents of U.S. citizens and permanent residents—to continue to work off the books, without the option of lawful employment to provide for their families.
What evidence supports the fact that this image is of a trial? Check all of the boxes that apply. The women are pointing. The women are wearing white hats. It looks like there are guards and judges, as well as a jury.
A. The women are pointing and C. It looks like there are guards and judges, as well as a jury. These are the evidences from image that supports the fact that this image is of a trial.
Hence, options A. and C. are the right choice.
Trial and example: what are they?A judicial hearing to decide the outcome of a specific case is known as a trial. For example-Should your cousin be detained for taking her neighbor's dog, she may face a Trial.
What stage of the trial is that?A trial is when parties to a disagreement gather together to submit information as evidence in a formal setting, often a court, before a judge, jury, or another authority tasked by law with finding a fact, in an effort to resolve their conflict.
To know more about Trial visit:
https://brainly.com/question/249570
#SPJ1
The complete question is-
What evidence supports the fact that this image is of a trial? Check all of the boxes that apply. ( The image is added below)
A. The women are pointing.
B. The women are wearing white hats.
C. It looks like there are guards and judges, as well as a jury.
what was the result of the war of 1812?
The War of 1812 was a war between the United States and Great Britain, which lasted from 1812 to 1815. Despite some early American successes, such as victory at the Battle of Lake Erie, the war was generally inconclusive and ended in a draw. In 1814, both sides agreed to a peace treaty called the Treaty of Ghent, which restored relations between the two countries to the way they were before the war. One of the long-term effects of the war was that it strengthened the feeling of national unity in the United States and led to further territorial expansion in the West.
explain the causes of World War I including the formation of European alliances and the roles of imperialism, nationalism, and militarism
Answer:
Explanation:
The global battle known as World War I lasted from 1914 until 1918. The reasons of the conflict were intricate and numerous, although they may generally be linked to a variety of interrelated issues, such as the establishment of European alliances, imperialism, nationalism, and militarism.
The development of European alliances was one of the major factors that led to World War I. Several European nations made alliances with one another in the years preceding the war in an effort to bolster their positions in the event of conflict. The Triple Alliance between Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Italy and the Triple Entente between Great Britain, France, and Russia were the most significant of these partnerships.
The buildup to World War I was also significantly influenced by imperialism.Several European nations had imperial aspirations and tried to enlarge their spheres of influence and dominion. As a result, there was fierce rivalry for resources and lands, especially in Africa and Asia. Conflicts and rivalry between European nations were frequently caused by the battle for colonies and markets.
In the years leading up to the conflict, nationalism also played a part. Several European nations saw the rise of nationalist groups as people fought to defend their national identities and interests. This increased hostilities between various national groups, especially in areas like the Balkans where they coexisted in precarious balance.
And last, militarism was a significant contributor to World War I.Each European state that wanted to keep its position of power and reputation made significant investments in its military forces. As a result, there was a competition to develop the most advanced military technologies and capabilities among various nations. The militarization of Europe increased the likelihood of violence and made it more challenging to settle disputes peacefully.
Together, these elements produced a very unstable environment in Europe that ultimately sparked the start of World War I. The trigger event that started the war was the murder of Archduke Franz Ferdinand of Austria-Hungary by a Serbian nationalist in June 1914, although the underlying factors had been accumulating for a long time.
PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST
4. In two or three sentences, explain what a trade bloc is. Then briefly describe the purpose of each of
these three important trade blocs: North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the European
Union (EU), and the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). (4 points)
PLEASE I NEED THIS ASAP ECONOMICS !!! I WILL MARK BRAINLIEST
The statement below is from a historical document.
We the People of the United States...
do ordain and establish this
Constitution for the United States of
America.
Source: Library of Congress
How is this statement reflected in the modern American political
system?
This opening statement from the US Constitution, "We the People of the United States...", establishes the fundamental principle that the legitimacy and authority of the US government derives from the people. Some key ways this is reflected in the modern US political system:
1. Sovereignty resides with the people. The people have the ultimate authority and can change the government and constitution as they see fit. The government is designed to serve the people.
2. There are provisions for the people to have a say in government policymaking and influence their representatives. This includes free speech rights, the right to petition, elections, and more. Representatives must be responsive to citizens.
3. There are limits on government power and protections of individual rights and liberties. The Bill of Rights specifically protects rights that belong to the people, limiting what the government can do.
4. Amending the constitution is possible through direct action by the people and states, not just the federal government. This allows the people to formally change the system that governs them.
5. There is an emphasis on consent of the governed, with government legitimacy flowing from the bottom-up rather than top-down. Government must have the consent and support of the people.
6. Federalism divides power across levels of government and between branches, with checks and balances. This makes it harder for any one group to control government and policymaking against the will of the people. Power remains dispersed.
So in essence, the overall system is designed to be accountable to citizens, limit government power over people, and ensure government officials ultimately derive their authority from the people. That founding principle profoundly shapes American democracy and politics.
What was the Gulf of Tonkin incident?
A. The declaration of war by South Vietnam on the US
B. The attacking of a US ship in a Vietnamese harbor
C. The bombing of a South Vietnamese town
D. The first US attack on Vietnamese soil
Answer:
Option B is the correct answer.
Explanation:
The Gulf of Tonkin incident was a series of events in August 1964 that involved the alleged attacks on two American naval destroyers, USS Maddox and USS Turner Joy, by North Vietnamese patrol boats in the Gulf of Tonkin. As a result, the US Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which authorized the use of military force by US armed forces in Vietnam.
Answer the following in at least 5-8 complete sentences.
In your own words, provide a definition for the term imperialism that addresses the four different arguments about the causes and values of imperialism (as mentioned in the article).
First argument: Does Imperialism pay?
Second argument: Imperialism is the nature of human beings.
Third argument: Strategy and security of the region.
Fourth argument: Moral grounds- the spread of religion.
Part 2 - Opinion Writing:
Based on what you have learned in this unit, as well as from the article, write an introductory paragraph to an essay expressing your opinion on the issue of imperialism. Overall, is imperialism a positive or negative condition and/or policy, and what are some examples to support your position?
Answer:
L'impérialisme peut être défini comme une politique d'expansion territoriale et d'influence politique et économique sur d'autres nations et peuples. Cette politique a été motivée par différents arguments, notamment économiques, humains, stratégiques et moraux. Certains ont justifié l'impérialisme en affirmant qu'il était rentable, que la domination était la nature humaine, que cela garantissait la sécurité régionale ou que c'était une façon de propager une religion. Cependant, d'autres ont critiqué cette politique en affirmant que c'était une forme de domination et d'exploitation qui nuisait aux peuples soumis. Ils ont également souligné les effets négatifs sur la culture et la société des nations dominées. En fin de compte, l'impérialisme peut être considéré comme une politique et une condition à la fois positives et négatives, en fonction des motivations, des méthodes et des conséquences. Dans cet essai, je vais soutenir que l'impérialisme est généralement une politique négative en raison des conséquences néfastes pour les peuples dominés, mais que dans certains cas, il peut être considéré comme positif, par exemple lorsque les peuples dominés bénéficient d'une modernisation bénéfique, d'une meilleure gouvernance et de protections accrues contre les conflits. Pour illustrer mon point de vue, je vais examiner plusieurs exemples d'impérialisme dans l'histoire, tels que le colonialisme européen en Afrique, l'impérialisme japonais en Asie et l'expansion américaine dans les Caraïbes et en Amérique latine.
Explanation:
What type of leader was Theodora
Answer:
One of the most powerful women in Byzantine history was Theodora, an empress who was married to Justinian I in the sixth century. She promoted religious and social policies that were significant to her by using her position of strength and influence.
Explanation:
Theodora's successes were entirely her own, the product of her astute political savvy, quick wit, astute social skills, and strong moral convictions.
The Santa Fe Trail was used as a trade route between Mexico and:
A. Montana.
B. California.
C. Oregon.
D. Missouri.
Answer:
Yo, the Santa Fe Trail was a trade route back in the day, connectin' Mexico with Missouri, man. So the answer is D. Missouri, bro!
Answer: D.Missouri
Explanation:
Missouri is where it started and Mexico is where it ended.
Analyze the power that unions have in states that have passed right-to-work laws compared to those states that have not
Right-to-work laws prohibit unions from requiring workers to join a union or pay union dues as a condition of employment.
What is a union?A union refers to a system of government or organization that aims to promote and coordinate social programs and policies across a region or country. The goal of a social union is to ensure that all citizens have access to similar social benefits and services regardless of their location or economic status. Social programs such as healthcare, education, and social security are often coordinated through a social union, and funding for these programs may be provided by a central government or by member states or provinces. The concept of a social union is often associated with federal systems of government, where individual states or provinces retain some autonomy but are also bound together by a common set of social policies and programs.
To learn more about union, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/16655124
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Analyze the power that unions have in states that have passed right-to-work laws compared to those states that have not?
Identify the 15 cabinet departments and the names of each department secretaries under the Biden administration. (Use Wikipedia or other sources)
Answer:
Kamala Harris
VICE PRESIDENT
Antony Blinken
SECRETARY OF STATE
Janet Yellen
SECRETARY OF THE TREASURY
Lloyd Austin
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE
Merrick Garland
ATTORNEY GENERAL
Deb Haaland
SECRETARY OF THE INTERIOR
Tom Vilsack
SECRETARY OF AGRICULTURE
Gina Raimondo
SECRETARY OF COMMERCE
Xavier Becerra
SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Marcia Fudge
SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT
Pete Buttigieg
SECRETARY OF TRANSPORTATION
Jennifer Granholm
SECRETARY OF ENERGY
Dr. Miguel Cardona
SECRETARY OF EDUCATION
Denis McDonough
SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
Alejandro Mayorkas
SECRETARY OF HOMELAND SECURITY
Michael Regan
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Avril Haines
DIRECTOR OF NATIONAL INTELLIGENCE
Katherine Tai
UNITED STATES TRADE REPRESENTATIVE
Linda Thomas-Greenfield
UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR TO THE UNITED NATIONS
Dr. Cecilia Rouse
CHAIR OF THE COUNCIL OF ECONOMIC ADVISERS
Isabel Guzman
ADMINISTRATOR OF THE SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION
Shalanda Young
DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET
Dr. Arati Prabhakar
DIRECTOR OF THE OFFICE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY POLICY
Jeff Zients
CHIEF OF STAFF
Explanation:
My source: https://www.whitehouse.gov/administration/cabinet/
Was the decision by President Carter to boycott the 1980 Olympic games a good decision for the United States? Did this decision make a difference in the Soviet Union’s invasion? Did it have a positive or negative impact on U.S. citizens? In other words, did it actually make a difference positively or negatively?
The decision by President Carter to boycott the 1980 Moscow Olympics is controversial and complex, with arguments on both sides.
On the positive side:
• It showed moral support for the U.S. boycott of the Olympics in protest of the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan. Some saw it as a principled stand against Soviet aggression.
• It may have irritated the Soviet Union and weakened their prestige on the world stage by having a conspicuous absence of U.S. athletes at the games.
• It boosted patriotism and national pride in the U.S. for standing up to the Soviets.
However, there are also criticisms and downsides to consider:
• It likely did little to actually influence the Soviet presence or policies in Afghanistan. The boycott did not force the Soviets to withdraw.
• It denied U.S. athletes the chance to compete on the world stage and possibly win medals. This disappointed many American athletes and sports fans.
• It damaged relations with U.S. allies who did not support the boycott, creating diplomatic tensions.
• It gave the impression that the U.S. was capitulating to Soviet demands by compromising Olympic participation over foreign policy concerns.
• There is little evidence the boycott put meaningful economic or political pressure on the Soviet system. The Soviets seemed largely dismissive of it.
So in summary, while the boycott boosted morale at home, it likely had little practical impact on Soviet actions or policies. It made a statement but did not substantially change realities on the ground. The decision remains polarizing, with reasonable positions on both sides regarding its effectiveness and consequences. Ultimately, its positive or negative impact depends a lot on one's perspective.
how were the victims of Racims in both germany in south Africa
Answer:
Racism had a significant impact on both Germany and South Africa in the past, but the nature and scope of racism differed in both countries.
In Germany, during the Nazi regime led by Adolf Hitler, millions of Jews, Romas, homosexuals, disabled people, and others were targeted and systematically murdered in what became known as the Holocaust. This was a result of Nazi ideology that deemed certain groups of people as inferior and unworthy of life. The Holocaust is considered one of the most significant tragedies in human history and serves as a reminder of the devastating consequences of racism, discrimination, and prejudice.
In South Africa, apartheid was a system of institutionalized racial segregation that was implemented by the white minority government in the mid-20th century. It resulted in widespread discrimination, inequality, and human rights abuses against non-white South Africans, particularly Black people. Non-white people were denied many basic rights, such as access to education, housing, and employment. The apartheid system was ultimately dismantled in the early 1990s, following years of protests, sanctions, and international pressure.
Both Germany and South Africa have since made efforts to acknowledge and address their respective histories of racism, including through education, remembrance, and policies aimed at promoting equality and combating discrimination.
Throughout history, gold has been a valuable precious metal. Its value as a metal led many civilizations to use it as a currency. In this role, gold was serving as which type of money?
A. Commodity money
B. Representative money
C. Fiat money
D. Currency money SUBMIT
Answer:
Explanation:
Commodity money
Gold was serving as commodity money. Money that derives its worth from the commodity from which it is made is known as commodity money. Thus, option A is correct.
What is commodity money?Objects with intrinsic worth or use, as well as their value when used to purchase products, make up commodity money. This contrasts with fiat money, which derives its value from having been established as money by government regulation, and representational money, which has no intrinsic worth but instead represents something valuable like gold or silver, in which it can be exchanged.
Gold, silver, copper, salt, peppercorns, tea, ornamented belts, shells, alcohol, cigarettes, silk, candies, nails, cocoa beans, cowries, and barley are a few examples of commodities that have been used as means of exchange.
Learn more about commodity money here:
https://brainly.com/question/30268213
#SPJ5
Which of the following is true about the Cuban Missile Crisis? Select 4 answer choices
Question 2 options:
The Cuban Missile Crisis is an example of the constant standoff between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War.
The Soviets agreed to remove the missiles from Cuba when the United States agreed to remove their own missiles from Turkey.
The United States quarantined, surrounded, Cuba using military vessels.
The Soviet Union placing missiles in Cuba that threatened the United States.
The X-Men stopped a nuclear attack.
Answer:
The Cuban Missile Crisis is an example of the constant standoff between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War.
The Soviets agreed to remove the missiles from Cuba when the United States agreed to remove their own missiles from Turkey.
The United States quarantined, surrounded, Cuba using military vessels.
The Soviet Union placing missiles in Cuba that threatened the United States.
Explanation:
The Cuban Missile Crisis of October 1962 was a direct and dangerous confrontation between the United States and the Soviet Union during the Cold War and was the moment when the two superpowers came closest to nuclear conflict.
Which of the following was NOT a decision made at the Yalta Conference?
A. Soviets did not have to allow free elections in occupied cities
B. The Soviets would join the war against Japan
C. Germany would be divided into four parts
D. Germans were to pay reparations for the war
Answer:
a
Explanation:
Which of the following describes a way in which enslaved Africans would
resist the conditions of slavery?
Choose 1 answer:
converting to Judaism
contracting smallpox
working at a faster pace
breaking tools which one is correct
Answer: They broke tools.
Explanation: Don't worry this answer is correct, I answered this question on khan Academy :).
2. Explain how FEMA's role changed after it became part of the Department of
Homeland Security in 2003 and again after the response to Hurricane Katrina in
2005. (2 points)
FEMA or the Federal Emergency Management Agency, was created in 1979 to help prepare for and respond to the disasters in the United States.
What are disasters?Disasters refer to events that cause significant harm and disruption to human lives, infrastructure, and the environment. They can be natural, such as earthquakes, hurricanes, floods, and wildfires, or human-made, such as industrial accidents, terrorist attacks, and civil unrest. Disasters can result in the loss of lives, displacement of people, damage to property and infrastructure, disruption of essential services, and the spread of diseases. They can have long-term economic, social, and environmental consequences. Disasters can be mitigated through preparedness measures such as risk assessments, emergency planning, and public education. Effective response and recovery efforts involve coordination and collaboration between government agencies, civil society organizations, and communities to restore normalcy and build resilience.
To learn more about disasters, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/28991652
#SPJ1
Why did the Cold War accelerate the end of Jim Crow?
1. After World War 2, Texas underwent many changes. One change was a huge increase in the state's ______.
2. President Eisenhower supported the creation of an ______ highway system to connect all states with high quality roads.
3. Because of new highways, people could live in ______ and drive to their jobs in the downtown area.
4. As ______ grew, the number of small, family-owned farms decreased.
5. The increased use of farm machinery and ______ greatly increased crop production.
After World War 2, Texas underwent many changes, and one change was a huge increase in the state's population.
What is population?Population refers to the total number of individuals or organisms of a particular species living within a specific geographical area or region. It is a fundamental concept in ecology, demographics, and social sciences. The size and characteristics of a population are determined by various factors, including birth and death rates, migration patterns, and environmental factors such as resource availability and climate. Population size and growth rate have significant implications for social, economic, and environmental issues, such as urbanization, healthcare, food security, and biodiversity conservation. Understanding population dynamics is crucial for sustainable development and effective policy-making, particularly in the context of global challenges such as climate change, biodiversity loss, and human health.
To learn more about population, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/30781042
#SPJ1
Explain what events and actions caused the conflict
between Barbara Frietchie and the Confederate soldiers.
Write three to four sentences.
While Confederate soldiers marched by, Barbara Frietchie flew a Union flag.
What about Barbara Fritchie?According to Barbara Fritchie's tale, as Confederate troops advanced into Union territory and drew near a particular town, the men there took down the Union flags that were flying out of concern for retaliation.
Barbara Fritchie would have none of that, so she: went outside and flew the Union flag; rebuked General "Stonewall" Jackson for trying to convince her to take it down by reminding him that it was the flag of the United States and that he must respect it; and went back inside and lowered the Union flag. She requested that no soldier take the flag down, and General Jackson complied.
To learn more about Barbara Fritchie, refer to:
https://brainly.com/question/2720323
Which troops were the first to reach Berlin, and start to bring an end to the war?
A. Soviet
B. American
C. Italian
D. British
Answer:
A
Explanation:
The battle began on April 16 when the Soviets attacked along the Oder River near Berlin. They quickly defeated the German forces outside Berlin and advanced on the city. By April 20th the Soviets began bombing Berlin. They worked their way around the city and had it completely surrounded in a few days.
6. What is one example in the passage of problems between the state governments and
the national government?
Anyone pls
So essentially the question is: How can the state government go against the federal government?
The given information leaves no area for the passage but I can mildly infer what you mean.
To start:
So, constitutionally speaking, the States have more rights than the federal government.
We didn’t start out with a country which was then divided up into states.
Instead, we started out with states that all agreed to have a Federal Government that was given limited powers by those states. The states reserved the right of veto over many things the Federal Government might do. In fact, when the Confederation of Southern States decided to secede from the Union before the Civil War, they were prevented from doing so not because seceeding was unconstitutional (it wasn’t), but because the Federal Government went to war with the Southern States under president Abraham Lincoln and re-captured those lands with the same expansionist mindset that was used to take away the land of Native Americans in the Westward growth of this country. That Civil War resulted in more American deaths than WWI and WWII combined.
It is the nature of government to assume a necessity and right of top-down absolute control over everything and everyone of it’s subjects. The US Constitution was set up to prevent that, but most people who enter government are soon infatuated and addicted to power and our constitution has been chipped away at ever since. It is not so much that the written text of the constitution has been changed legally and voted on, but that a combination of lawmakers and judges throughout history have simply ignored the Constitution.
Thanks.
#SPJ1
Need HELP
What is one way that nonprofit media companies differ from for-profit media companies?
Advertising funds most nonprofit media companies.
Nonprofit media companies often have a less diverse staff.
Nonprofit media companies decide ad sales based on audience size.
Educating the public is the primary goal of nonprofit media companies.
Answer:
I think is option D) Dont know though.
Explanation:
sorry if wrong.
Rosa Parks moved when she was 11 years old. She moved to the city of Montgomery,
Alabama. Why did she move?
Answer: hope it helps
Explanation:
In her younger years she was sick much of the time, and as a result, was a small child. Her parents eventually separated and her mother took her and her brother and moved to Pine Level, a town adjacent to Montgomery, Alabama. There Rosa spent the rest of her childhood on her grandparents' farm.
Answer:
because she needed to care for her dying grandmother and, shortly thereafter, her chronically ill mother.
Explanation:
The Venetians and Ottomans were trade partners because?
Answer:
a mutually beneficial relationship providing each with access to key ports and valuable goods
Explanation:
i hope this helps :)
Illegal drugs are a problem in Colombia. true or false?
Answer: very true jesus how much there is. its crazy
Explanation:
Which of these was not one of the main ways a person could become a slave in New England? if they sold themselves to pay a debt if they were forced into it by the courts if they were purchased from another colonist if they were captured during a war
Due to the region's more diverse economy, it was typical for individual enslaved individuals in New England to master specialized skills and trades. In order to administer their families and help them out at work, ministers, physicians, business owners, and tradespeople also employed slave labor.
What were the main reasons for slavery?
European traders were drawn to West Africa by its commercial riches like ivory and gold. Slaves in West Africa rose to prominence as the most valuable 'commodity' for European traders as the desire for cheap labour to work on plantations in the Americas increased. Before the arrival of the Europeans, slavery existed throughout Africa.
Slavery has been practised historically in a variety of ways, including as property, in bonds, as forced labor, and as sexual slavery.
Throughout the whole colonial era, slaves were imported into New England, and until the American Revolution, slavery was practised in all of the colonies. Most slaves lived at least part of their lives as slaves and were frequently purchased as young children in coastal cities.
Learn more about slave in New England:
https://brainly.com/question/3568353
#SPJ1