Find the area of the shaded region

Answer:

r= -sec(θ) x ∛2

θ=0

Step-by-step explanation:

if c is a irrational number that means a or b is also an irrational number or both of them are irrational numbers but they are different then each other

i hope that will help

There are two possible answers:

You can only pick one of those two cases. In short, exactly one of the 'a' or b is irrational and the other is rational. Both 'a' and b cannot be rational together, and they both cannot be irrational together.

================================================

Explanation:

For a moment, let's say that 'a' and b are both rational numbers. This means they would be ratios of integers. So,

a = p/q

b = r/s

where p,q,r,s are integers. The denominators q & s cannot be zero.

Multiplying those rational numbers 'a' and b leads to

a*b = (p/q)*(r/s) = (p*r)/(q*s)

We get a result in the form of integer/integer. Recall that multiplying any two integers leads to some other integer. Since (p*r)/(q*s) is a ratio of integers, it is rational and that makes a*b = c to be rational. However, your teacher said that c is irrational which is the opposite of rational.

In short, if both 'a' and b are rational, then a*b = c is rational. This means we know for certain that both 'a' and b cannot be both rational for c to be irrational.

------------------------

Next, we'll consider 'a' and b to both be irrational. Is it possible to have a*b = c to be irrational as well? It depends.

If we have the following

a = sqrt(3)

b = sqrt(12)

then,

a*b = sqrt(3)*sqrt(12) = sqrt(3*12) = sqrt(36) = 6

Showing that a*b is rational because 6 = 6/1 is a ratio of integers. This is a bit strange considering how 'a' and b themselves were irrational, but they led to a rational product.

This doesn't always happen since something like

sqrt(3)*sqrt(5) = sqrt(3*5) = sqrt(15)

is irrational. So if both 'a' and b are irrational together, then a*b could be rational or it could be irrational. We would need more information about the values of 'a' and b.

Therefore, we know that we can rule out the case that 'a' and b are irrational together.

------------------------

Lastly, we'll consider the case when one of 'a' or b is rational while the other is irrational. The order doesn't matter. So we'll make 'a' to be irrational and b to be rational.

Since b is rational, this means b = p/q for some integers p,q where q is nonzero. The value of 'a' cannot be written as a ratio like this because it is irrational.

Multiplying any nonzero rational number with an irrational one always leads to an irrational result. If a*b was rational, then we could say

a*b = r/s

a*(p/q) = r/s

a = (r/s)*(q/p)

a = (r*q)/(s*p)

Showing that 'a' is rational, but this contradicts the fact we made 'a' to be irrational at the top of this section. Therefore, a*b is always irrational if exactly one of 'a' or b is irrational and the other is rational.

In other words, if,

then a*b = c is irrational

Answer:

Thats easy C:

2 and 3 at the same time

Step-by-step explanation:

3x2=6 or if you dived 6/2=3

Also one thing when doing markup or profit(I think thats how you spell it if not im srry my spelling is very bad lol) you dived it

Have a good day :D

9514 1404 393

Answer:

  7.7 seconds

Step-by-step explanation:

The solution is given by the quadratic formula.

For ax² +bx +c = 0, the roots are ...

  x = (-b±√(b²-4ac))/(2a)

We want the positive root, so ...

  x = (-113 -√(113² -4(-16)(74)))/(2(-16)) = (113 +√17505)/32 ≈ 7.6658

The rocket will hit the ground about 7.7 seconds after it is launched.

Answer:

i don't get the question

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3.259259259259 in²

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

3 7/27

Step-by-step explanation:

Ok so first you do

2×1 = 2, then

2×2/9 = 4/9, then

1×2/3 = 2/3, then

2/3×2/9 = 4/27, then add all of those...

2+4/9+2/3+4/27= 3 7/27    

Hope this helps!! :D

Answer:

Present value (PV) is the current value of a future sum of money or stream of cash flows given a specified rate of return. Future cash flows are discounted at the discount rate, and the higher the discount rate, the lower the present value of the future cash flows.

How to find PV:Calculating present value is called discounting. Discounting cash flows, like our $25,000, simply means that we take inflation and the fact that money can earn interest into account.

...

Calculating Present Value Using the Formula

FV = the future value.

i = interest rate.

t = number of time periods.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: Present value, also known as discounted value, is a financial calculation that measures the worth of a future amount of money or stream of payments in today’s dollars adjusted for interest and inflation. In other words, it compares the buying power of one future dollar to purchasing power of one today

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

In no case will there be a modification greater than 5%, thus, it cannot be inferred that the voter support will change in the next election.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that four parties participated in 2018 Provincial election in Ontario; PC, NDP, Liberal, Green party, and PC captured 40% of the vote, NDP 30%, Liberal 25%, and the Green party 5%, and the survey of 1000 voters asked each to identify the party that they would vote for in the next election, and its results were PC = 415, NDP = 256, Liberal = 271, and Green party = 58, to determine if it can be inferred at 5% level of significance that the voter support is going to change in the next election the following calculations must be performed:

PC = 40 - (415/1000 x 100) = 40 - 41.5 = -1.5

NDP = 30 - (256/1000 x 100) = 30 - 25.6 = 4.4

Liberal = 25 - (271/1000 x 100) = 25 - 27.1 = -2.1

Green Party = 5 - (58/1000 x 100) = 5 - 5.8 = -0.8

Therefore, as can be seen, in no case will there be a modification greater than 5%, thus, it cannot be inferred that the voter support will change in the next election.

Answer: Y= 400 (1-0.1t)

Step-by-step explanation:

Y the value after depreciation period

400 initial value

0.1 dep rate

T time

Answer:

2 real solutions

Step-by-step explanation:

Determinant of a quadratic equation: [tex]b^2-4ac=(-3)^2-4\times2\times(-7-36)=353.[/tex]

Since the determinant is larger than 0, it has 2 real solutions.

Answer:

1_2/3

=1/3 or 0.33

Step-by-step explanation:

Probability is not more than 1..

The Answer is (6x^2+7x+2)

Use the FOIL method

Answer:

d = C - 2/3

Step-by-step explanation:

Subtract 2/3 from both sides of the equation:

C = d + 2/3

-2/3     -2/3

-----------------

C - 2/3 = d

After rearranging the expression and taking the subject d is d = C - 2/3 or d = (3C-2)/3.

It is defined as the relation between two variables, if we plot the graph of the linear equation we will get a straight line.

If in the linear equation, one variable is present, then the equation is known as the linear equation in one variable.

We have:

C=d + 2/3

C - 2/3 = d (subtract both side by 2/3)

or

d = C - 2/3 or

d = (3C-2)/3

Thus, after rearranging the expression and taking the subject d is d = C - 2/3 or d = (3C-2)/3.

Learn more about the linear equation here:

brainly.com/question/11897796

#SPJ2

Answer:

I love Math anyways  

the ans is in the picture with the steps  

(hope it helps can i plz have brainlist :D hehe)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Last option, $58.50

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's look at the graph, and let's do a simple analysis of the information that it shows.

We can see that in 2009, the price was between $30 and $40.

We can see that as the years pass by, the price increases, such that in the year 2013 the selling price spikes and ranges between a bit less than $50 to a little more than $50.

Then we can only expect that a few years later (in 2016) the price to be larger than $50.

The only option that has a price larger than $50 is the last one, $58.50, then that one is the only option that can be the correct one.

We also could do an exact calculation of this if we had the raw data, but as you can see in the graph, we can not know the exact price of each graphed point (we can only estimate it) so we will not get a nice interpolation by only using the given graph.

Answer:

22+34i

Step-by-step explanation:

Brainliest?

Answer:

22+34i

Step-by-step explanation:

(12+9i)+(10+25i)

12+9i+10+25i

12+10+9i+25i

22+34i

Answer:

20 ft? im not 100% sure tho

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

210 is answer when bases are same. powers should be added

Step-by-step explanation:

it's basically indicesis basically in this is so it was multiplication addition rule that you use

Answer:

72

Step-by-step explanation:

3x/6=36

3x=36(6)

3x=216

x=216/3

x=72

Answer:

I think Cube

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

-2x+10

Step-by-step explanation:

-2(x-5)

Distribute

-2*x -2*-5

-2x+10

Answers

D 36

Step-by-step explanation:

77 is the area for the squared trapezoid and 36 is the closest to 77

Answer:

So happy you are with brainly

Step-by-step explanation:

34

Answer:

231

Step-by-step explanation:

TB equals 90 bc it's a 90 degree angle. To get BD you need to subtract 180 and 90 bc half of a circle equals 180. Do the same to find DC but it's 180-129. Then to find TBC you add all of those together.

Answer: 1.1

Step-by-step explanation:

Expected value is the weighted average of the various possibilities and their probability of occurring.

The probabilities represented are:

0.35, 0.35, 0.15 and 0.15.

They add up to:

= 0.35 +0.35 + 0.15 + 0.15

= 1

The possibilities are; 0, 1, 2 and 3.

Expected value = (0.35 * 0) + (0.35 * 1) + (0.15 *2) + ( 0.15 * 3)

= 1.1

Answer:

[tex] {3}^{81}[/tex] is bigger.

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex] {9}^{27} = ( {3}^{2} )^{27} = {3}^{2 \times 27} = {3}^{54} \\ [/tex]

If we compare the exponents of [tex] {3}^{54}[/tex] and [tex] {3}^{81}[/tex] it can be concluded that:

[tex] {3}^{81}[/tex] > [tex] {3}^{54}[/tex]

Answer:

Yes, you can make a triangle with it

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]Lengths: 9in, 4in, 6in[/tex]

Required

Do the lengths form a valid triangle

To do this, we make use of triangle inequality theorem which states that;

For sides a, b and c;

[tex]a + b > c[/tex]

[tex]b + c >a[/tex]

[tex]a + c > b[/tex]

So, we have:

[tex]9 + 4 > 6[/tex] -- true

[tex]4 + 6 > 9[/tex] -- true

[tex]6 + 9 > 4[/tex] -- true

Since all the inequalities are true, then the sides form a valid triangle

Answer:7

Step-by-step explanation: 3 1/4 is equal to 13/4. When dividing fractions, you switch the numerator and denominator in the second fraction and change the symbol to a multiplication symbol. You then multiply straight across and then divide the top number by the bottom number. The whole number is how many times you can divide it equally