helpppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppppp

Answer:

Inventory turnover ratio is 3.74

explanation:

Inventory turnover is a ratio of the number of times a company's inventory is sold and replaced in a given period.

Inventory turn over ratio is calculated as ; Cost of goods sold ÷ Average stock of goods sold

= $35,500 / $9500

= 3.74

Answer:

z(max) = 650 $

x₁ = 10 units

x₂ = 15 units

Step-by-step explanation:

That is a linear programming problem, we will use a simplex method to solve it

Formulation:

Let´s call  x₁  number of chairs   and x₂ number of tables then :

Item              (in hours)     cutting       assembly      finishing        Profit ($)

Chairs (x₁)                              1                   2                     1                      20

Tables (x₂)                              2                   1                      1                      30

Availability                           40                 42                   25

Objective Function

z  =  20*x₁   +  30x₂   ( to maximize) subject to:

x₁  +  2x₂   ≤  40

2x₁  + x₂    ≤  42

x₁ + x₂     ≤    25

x₁  ,   x₂  >= 0

Using excel or any other software we find:

z(max) = 650

x₁ = 10

x₂ = 15

The chairs and tables manufactured by the factory is an illustration of linear programming, where the maximum revenue is 674

Let x represent chairs, and y represent tables

So, the given parameters are:

Cutting:

So, the constraint is:

[tex]\mathbf{x + 2y \le 40}[/tex]

Assembly:

So, the constraint is:

[tex]\mathbf{2x + y \le 42}[/tex]

Finishing:

So, the constraint is:

[tex]\mathbf{x + y \le 25}[/tex]

The unit profit on the items are:

So, the objective function to maximize is:

[tex]\mathbf{Max\ z = 20x + 30y}[/tex]

And the constraints are:

[tex]\mathbf{x + 2y \le 40}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{2x + y \le 42}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{x + y \le 25}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{x,y \ge 0}[/tex]

Using graphical method (see attachment for graph), we have the following feasible points:

[tex]\mathbf{(x,y) = \{(10,15),\ (17,8),\ (14.67, 12.67)\}}[/tex]

Calculate the objective function using the feasible points.

[tex]\mathbf{z = 20 \times 10 + 30 \times 15}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{z = 650}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{z = 20 \times 17 + 30 \times 8}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{z = 580}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{z = 20 \times 14.67+ 30 \times 12.67}[/tex]

[tex]\mathbf{z = 673.5}[/tex]

Approximate

[tex]\mathbf{z = 674}[/tex]

Hence, the maximum revenue is 674

Read more about linear programming at:

https://brainly.com/question/14225202

Hi there! :)

Answer:

Given the information, we can write an equation in slope-intercept form

(y = mx + b) to graph the line:

Plug in the slope for 'm', the y-coordinate of the point given for 'y', and the

x-coordinate given for 'x':

-4 = -2/3(-7) + b

-4 = 14/3 + b

Solve for b:

-12/3 = 14/3 + b

-12/3 - 14/3 = b

-26/3 = b

Therefore, the equation of the line is y = -2/3x - 26/3 (Graphed below)

Some points on the line include:

(-7, -4)

(-4, -6)

(0, -26/3)

(2, -10)

(5, -12)

Answer:

C. 0.0009

Step-by-step explanation:

0.09/100

= 0.0009

Answer:A

Step-by-step explanation:0.09=0.9

Answer:

The factors are (4x-1) and (2x+3)

Step-by-step explanation:

The factors of 8x^2 + 10x -3 can be found by grouping terms

8x^2 - 2x  + 12x - 3

2x (4x -1)  + 3(4x-1)

(4x-1)(2x+3)

Answer:

Angle 2= 45

Angle 3= 45

Angle 4= 135

Angle 5= 135

Angle 6= 45

Angle 7= 45

Angle 8= 135

Answer:

x = 8.9 units

Step-by-step explanation:

We will use the theorem of intersecting tangent and secant segments.

"If secant and tangent are drawn to a circle from an external point, the product of lengths of the secant and its external segment will equal the square of the length of tangent."

8(8 + 2) = x²

x² = 80

x = √80

x = 8.944

x ≈ 8.9 units

Therefore, length of the tangent = 8.9 units

Answer:

x should equal 1

Step-by-step explanation:

(1*129)-3=126

129-3=126

126=126

Answer:

x=1

Step-by-step explanation:

We can start by adding 3 to both sides to get rid of the -3

That leaves us with 129x=129

It ends up working out really evenly because by dividing both sides by 129, we are left with x=1

Answer:

33333 x 166667 = 5555511111

I think that is the answer you wanted

Step-by-step explanation:

      166667

     x 33333

5555511111

Answer:

192

Step-by-step explanation:

There are a total of 15 marbles . When the lavender is left out 14 remain.

Using combinations we find that each of the four color marbles can be chosen in the following way.

2C1*4C1*4C1*6C1= 2*4*4*6=  192

We select  one of the two red marbles , one of the four green marbles, one of the four yellow marbles, one of the 6 orange marbles leaving the lavender out.. We apply combinations and then multiply to get the answer.

Answer:

A=82°

a= 67.4

c = 60.1

Step-by-step explanation:

For A

A+B+C =180°

A= 180-(B+C)

A= 180-(36+62)

A= 189-(98)

A= 82°

For a

a/sinA= b/sinB

a/sin82= 40/sin36

a= (40*sin82)/sin36

a=( 40*0.9903)/0.5878

a=67.39

Approximately = 67.4

For c

c/sinC= b/sinB

c= (sinC*b)/sinB

c= (sin62*40)/sin36

c =(0.8829*40)/0.5878

c = 60.08

Approximately = 60.1

Answer:

It will take 18,569.2 years for carbon–14 to decay to 10 percent of its original amount

Step-by-step explanation:

The amount of Carbon-14 after t years is given by the following equation:

[tex]A(t) = A(0)e^{-rt}[/tex]

In which A(0) is the initial amount and r is the decay rate, as a decimal.

Carbon–14 is a radioactive isotope that decays exponentially at a rate of 0.0124 percent a year.

This means that [tex]r = \frac{0.0124}{100} = 0.000124[/tex]

How many years will it take for carbon–14 to decay to 10 percent of its original amount?

This is t for which:

[tex]A(t) = 0.1A(0)[/tex]

So

[tex]A(t) = A(0)e^{-rt}[/tex]

[tex]0.1A(0) = A(0)e^{-0.000124t}[/tex]

[tex]e^{-0.000124t} = 0.1[/tex]

[tex]\ln{e^{-0.000124t}} = \ln{0.1}[/tex]

[tex]-0.000124t = \ln{0.1}[/tex]

[tex]t = -\frac{\ln{0.1}}{0.000124}[/tex]

[tex]t = 18569.2[/tex]

It will take 18,569.2 years for carbon–14 to decay to 10 percent of its original amount

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let

T = number of trees

A = number of acorns

Given:

A =  18T + 4 ...........................(1)

A = 20T -4 .........................(2)

Equate A from (1) and (2)

20T-4 = 18T+4

simplify and solve for T

20T - 18T = 4+4

2T = 8

T = 4 trees

A = 18T + 4 = 72+4 = 76 acorns, or

A = 20T - 4 = 80 - 4 = 76 acorns.

Answer:

[tex]\Large \boxed{\sf \ \ 7 \ \ }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello, please consider the following.

The polynomial function is

[tex]x^3-5x^2-12x+14[/tex]

The rational root theorem states that each rational solution

   [tex]x=\dfrac{p}{q}[/tex]    

, written in irreducible fraction, satisfies the two following:

   p is a factor of the constant term

   q is a factor of the leading coefficient

In this example, the constant term is 14 and the leading coefficient is 1. It means that p is a factor of 14 and q a factor of 1.

Let's proceed with the prime factorisation of 14:

14 = 2 * 7

Finally, the possible rational roots of this expression are :

   1

   2

   7

   14

and we need to test for negative ones too

   -1

   -2

   -7

   -14

From your list, the correct answer is 7.

Hope this helps.

Do not hesitate if you need further explanation.

Thank you

Answer:

the answer is C.) 7

Answer:

RA

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{m = -2}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]0 = 4+4(m+1)[/tex]

Resolving Parenthesis

[tex]0 = 4+4m + 4[/tex]

[tex]0 = 4m+8[/tex]

Subtracting 8 to both sides

[tex]-8 = 4m[/tex]

[tex]4m = -8[/tex]

Dividing both sides by 4

m = -8/4

m = -2

Step-by-step explanation:

4+4m+4= 0

4m+8=0

4m=-8

m= -8/4=-2

Answer:

1 + 1 = 2

Step-by-step explanation:

^

Answer:

no , it's happening to everyone , even I can't see it .

Answer:

At 95% confidence limits for the true difference between the  average Miles per Gallon for the two models is -1.8210  to  4.1789

Yes 95 % confidence means  that there's conclusive evidence to indicate that one model gets a higher MPG than the other.

Step-by-step explanation:

                              Model A              Model B

Sample Size              50                          55

Sample Mean  x`         32                           35

Sample Variance  s²    9                            10

At 95 % confidence limits are given by

x1`-x2` ± 1.96 [tex]\sqrt{\frac{s^{2} }{n1} +\frac{s^{2}}{n2} }[/tex]

Putting the values

32-35  ± 1.96  [tex]\sqrt\frac{9}{50}+\frac{10}{55}[/tex]        ( the variance is the square of  standard deviation)

-3 ± 1.96 [tex]\sqrt{ \frac{495+500}{2750}[/tex]

-3 ± 1.96( 0.6015)

-3 ± 1.17896

-1.8210; 4.1789

Thus the 95% confidence limits for the true difference between the  average Miles per Gallon for the two models is -1.8210  to  4.1789.

Yes 95 % confidence means  that there's conclusive evidence to indicate that one model gets a higher MPG than the other.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Plug x as 2y-15 in the first equation and solve for y.

-5(2y-15)+4y=3

-10y+75+4y=3

-6y+75=3

-6y=-72

y=12

Plug y as 12 in the second equation and solve for x.

x=2(12)-15

x=24-15

x=9

Answer:

14π or 43.96

Step-by-step explanation:

C = 2πr and we know that r = 7 so C = 14π or 43.96.

Answer:

B. 5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

5

Step-by-step explanation:

You know that the empty barrel is 1/4 of the full barrel. Find 1/4 of 20 to get 0.25 x 20 = 5

Answer:

x = -6

Step-by-step explanation:

3(x+4)-1=-7

Add 1 to each side

3(x+4)-1+1=-7+1

3(x+4)=-6  

Divide by 3

3/3(x+4)=-6/3

x+4 = -2

Subtract 4 from each side

x+4-4 = -2-4

x = -6

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]3(x + 4) - 1 = - 7[/tex]

Distribute 3 through the parentheses

[tex]3x + 12 - 1 = - 7[/tex]

Calculate the difference

[tex]3x + 11 = - 7[/tex]

Move constant to R.H.S and change it's sign

[tex]3x = - 7 - 11[/tex]

Calculate

[tex]3x = - 18[/tex]

Divide both sides of the equation by 3

[tex] \frac{3x}{3} = \frac{ - 18}{3} [/tex]

Calculate

[tex]x = - 6[/tex]

hope this helps

Best regards!!

Answer:

1800

Step-by-step explanation:

Hello,

First of all we need to find the prime factorisation of the numbers.

18 = 2 * 3 * 3

40 = 2 * 2 * 2 * 5

75 = 3 * 5 * 5

It means that the LCM should have 5 * 5 , 2 * 2 * 2 and 3 * 3

Then LCM = 3 * 3 * 2 * 2 * 2 * 5 * 5 = 1800

Hope this helps.

Do not hesitate if you need further explanation.

Thank you

Answer:

1800

Step-by-step explanation:

→ First of all we need to find the prime factorisation of the numbers.

18 = 2 × 3 × 3 or 2 × 3²

40 = 2 × 2 × 2 × 5 or 2³ × 5

75 = 3 × 5 × 5 or 5² × 3

→ Now find the number that appear twice or more and write them down

3 and 3 from 18

2, 2 and 2 from 40

5 and 5 from 75

→ Now multiply all of these numbers together

3 × 3 × 2 × 2 × 2 × 5 × 5 = 3² × 2³ × 5² = 1800

Answer:

false

Step-by-step explanation:

When solving the distance formula it is the distance from one point to another. If you had a rectangle and used the distance formula from each point then you would have a perimeter

Answer:

Reject H0

Age and pressure are related

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis is rejected or accepted on the basis of level of significance. When the p-value is greater than level of significance we fail to reject the null hypothesis and null hypothesis is then accepted. It is not necessary that all null hypothesis will be rejected at 10% level of significance. To determine the criteria for accepting or rejecting a null hypothesis we should also consider p-value. In the given scenario we reject the null hypothesis because job pressure and age are related to each other.

Answer:

Length of Shortest Side = 12 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

Length of Shortest Side = L = 3x

Length of Longest Side = W = 5x-4

Condition:

2L+2W = Perimeter

2(3x)+2(5x-4) = 56

6x+10x-8 = 56

16x-8 = 56

Adding 8 to both sides

16x = 56+8

16x = 64

Dividing both sides by 14

=> x = 4

Now,

Length of the Shortest Side = L = 3(4) = 12 inches

Length of the Longest Side = W = 5(4)-4 = 16 inches

Answer:

12 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

The length is the longest side.

The width is the shortest side.

Length : [tex]l=5x-4[/tex]

Width : [tex]w=3x[/tex]

Apply formula for the perimeter of a rectangle.

[tex]P=2l+2w[/tex]

[tex]P=perimeter\\l=length\\w=width[/tex]

Plug in the values.

[tex]56=2(5x-4)+2(3x)[/tex]

[tex]56=10x-8+6x[/tex]

[tex]56=16x-8[/tex]

[tex]64=16x[/tex]

[tex]4=x[/tex]

The shortest side is the width.

[tex]w=3x[/tex]

Plug in the value for x.

[tex]w=3(4)[/tex]

[tex]w=12[/tex]

Answer:

2 < x < ∞

Step-by-step explanation:

We want where the value of y is less than zero

The value of the graph is  less than zero is from x=2 and continues until x = infinity

2 < x < ∞

Answer:

[tex]\boxed{2 < x < \infty}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The value of y should be less than 0 for the graph of the function to be negative.

In the graph, when it startes from x is 2 the value becomes less than 0 and it keeps continuing until x is equal to infinity.

[tex]2 < x < \infty[/tex]

Answer:

25

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use the Pythagorean theorem to solve

a^2 + b^2 = c^2

We know the two legs and want to find the hypotenuse

15^2+ 20 ^2 = c^2

225 + 400 = c^2

625 = c^2

Taking the square root of each side

sqrt(625) = c^2

25 = c

Answer:

63

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that;

The bag has two red marbles,  n(red) =2

three green ones marbles,  n(green) = 3

one lavender one marbles,  n(lavender) = 1

two yellows marbles,            n(yellow ) = 2

two orange marbles.              n(orange) = 2

number of non green marbles = 2+1+2+2 = 7

The objective is to find out how many sets of four marbles include exactly two green marbles

Since sets of four marbles contain exactly two green marbles, then N(select 2 from 3 marbles and 2 from 7 marbles)

= [tex]^3C_2 \times ^{7}C _2[/tex]

= [tex]\dfrac{3!}{2!(3-2)!} \times \dfrac{7!}{2!(7-2)!}[/tex]

= [tex]\dfrac{3*2!}{2!} \times \dfrac{7*6*5!}{2!(5)!}[/tex]

=  [tex]3 \times 7\times 3[/tex]

= 63