List of Major events in U.S history that Forrest is involved in

The term for the group called for jury duty from which jury panels are selected is the "jury pool" or "venire."

The jury pool consists of a larger group of individuals who are summoned for jury duty based on specific criteria set by the court. These criteria typically include age, citizenship, residency, and other qualifications required by the jurisdiction. The purpose of the jury pool is to ensure a diverse and representative selection of potential jurors for a particular trial.

From the jury pool, a smaller group known as the jury panel is selected through a process called voir dire. Voir dire involves questioning potential jurors to determine their suitability for serving on a particular case. The jury panel is then chosen based on the responses provided during voir dire, and they ultimately decide the outcome of the trial based on the evidence and arguments presented to them.

To learn more about jurisdiction click here:

brainly.com/question/14179714

#SPJ11

The camel was domesticated by the fourth century C.E. in the Arabian Peninsula and quickly became the major source of transport in the Saharan region. This was due to the camel's unique adaptations to desert environments, such as its ability to store water and withstand extreme temperatures.

Additionally, the camel was able to travel long distances without requiring large amounts of food or water, making it an ideal mode of transportation for trading caravans across the Sahara. The use of camels also allowed for increased trade and cultural exchange between the Saharan region and other parts of Africa and the Middle East.

Overall, the camel's ability to survive in harsh desert conditions and its efficient use as a mode of transportation made it the natural choice for trade and travel in the Saharan region.

Know more about the Arabian Peninsula here:

https://brainly.com/question/12168570

#SPJ11

Arkansas did not remain in the Union.

During the American Civil War (1861-1865), eleven southern states seceded from the United States to form the Confederate States of America. The states that seceded were South Carolina, Mississippi, Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Louisiana, Texas, Virginia, Arkansas, Tennessee, and North Carolina.

The remaining states, including Missouri, Delaware, Maryland, Kentucky, and others, remained in the Union. However, Arkansas did secede from the Union and joined the Confederacy on May 6, 1861. The state was readmitted to the Union in 1868 after the end of the Civil War.

To know more about Arkansas , click here.

https://brainly.com/question/28013606

#SPJ4

Answer:

Explanation:

There are many challenges facing the United States in the 21st century, some of the most significant of which include:

Economic inequality: The gap between rich and poor in the US has been growing, leading to a range of negative social and economic consequences.

Climate change: The US is one of the world's largest emitters of greenhouse gases, and rising temperatures, extreme weather events, and other climate-related impacts are affecting communities across the country.

Political polarization: The country is deeply divided along political lines, with many Americans feeling alienated from one another and from their government.

Health care: Despite being one of the wealthiest nations in the world, the US has some of the highest health care costs and worst health outcomes among developed countries.

Racial and social justice: The country continues to grapple with systemic racism, discrimination, and inequality, with significant disparities in wealth, health, education, and other areas.

Cybersecurity: As the world becomes increasingly connected and reliant on technology, the US faces a range of threats to its national security and economic stability from cyberattacks.

Globalization: The US is part of an interconnected global economy, and must navigate the challenges and opportunities of globalization while protecting the interests of its citizens.

These challenges are complex and interconnected and will require innovative and collaborative solutions to address.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

John Bidwell decided to leave Missouri because a trapper had described California as a paradise. So, the correct choice is ''A trapper made California sound like paradise''.

John Bidwell's decision to leave Missouri was primarily influenced by the enticing description of California provided by a trapper. Bidwell, like many other individuals of the time, was drawn to the prospect of finding an idyllic land abundant in natural resources and opportunities for wealth and success.

During the mid-19th century, trappers and explorers ventured into the vast western territories, sharing tales of the bountiful resources and fertile lands of California. These accounts captivated the imagination of Bidwell and others seeking new beginnings. The promise of a better life, with plentiful game, fertile soil, and potential riches, motivated Bidwell to venture westward.

While it is possible that Bidwell may have encountered challenges in finding employment in Missouri, it was the alluring image of California as a veritable paradise that proved to be the decisive factor behind his departure. The prospect of a land teeming with natural abundance and opportunities for personal and economic growth was a compelling lure for pioneers like Bidwell, prompting them to undertake arduous journeys across the vast and treacherous American frontier in pursuit of a brighter future.

For more questions on Missouri

https://brainly.com/question/3394354

#SPJ8

It is clear that during this period, the sectional quarrel between the North and the South became virtually irreconcilable and was not moderated by national political figures. While economic issues were certainly a factor in the conflict, the underlying cause was the deep-seated disagreement over slavery and its place in American society.

Between 1856 and 1860, the sectional quarrel between the North and the South of the United States became virtually irreconcilable. The issue of slavery had been a source of tension for many years, but it reached a boiling point during this period. The election of 1856 highlighted the deep divisions between the two regions, with the Republican Party running on an anti-slavery platform that angered Southern Democrats.

The following years saw a series of events that further escalated the conflict, including the Supreme Court's Dred Scott decision, which declared that slaves could not be considered citizens and therefore had no right to sue for their freedom. The 1859 raid on Harper's Ferry by abolitionist John Brown also intensified tensions, with many Southerners viewing it as evidence of a widespread Northern conspiracy to incite slave rebellions.

While some national political figures, such as President James Buchanan, attempted to moderate the conflict by calling for compromise and conciliation, their efforts were largely unsuccessful. The election of 1860, in which Republican Abraham Lincoln was elected without receiving a single vote from the South, marked the final break between the two regions and led to the secession of Southern states.

Learn more about national political figures here:-

https://brainly.com/question/15093090

#SPJ11

The U.S. entered an international effort in 1994 that kept an fragile peace in Haiti. For that reason, the correct option is D.

Haiti (option D) was facing a political crisis due to violence and poverty that had plagued the country for years. The crisis had reached a peak with the military overthrow of the democratically elected President Jean-Bertrand Aristide in 1991.

This led to an international embargo on Haiti that devastated its economy and increased the suffering of its people. In 1994, after years of political pressure, the U.S. led a multinational force to restore Aristide to power and end the violence.

This effort, known as Operation Uphold Democracy, helped to stabilize the country and bring peace to its people. However, the peace was uneasy and Haiti continued to face many challenges, including poverty and political instability.

Despite these challenges, the U.S. and other countries continue to demand that Haiti adapt and work towards a better future.

Learn more about Haiti: https://brainly.com/question/32135726

#SPJ11

The process of Reconstruction was complex and challenging, and it took many years for the southern states to fully recover from the devastation of the Civil War. Option D

The heading that completes the left column of the chart is "imposed military rule on southern states." This is because during Reconstruction, the federal government placed the southern states under military control in order to enforce the new laws and ensure that the Confederates did not regain power.

This military rule was imposed in response to the refusal of some southern states to ratify the Fourteenth Amendment, which granted citizenship and equal protection under the law to all persons born or naturalized in the United States.

The military governors appointed by the federal government were tasked with overseeing the reconstruction process and ensuring that the southern states complied with the new laws and amendments.

One of the key challenges of Reconstruction was how to ensure that the southern states would comply with these new laws and amendments. Some southern states were initially resistant to these changes, and there were fears that the Confederates would regain power and reverse the gains of the Civil War.

The federal government therefore imposed military rule on these states in order to ensure that the new laws and amendments were enforced and that the Confederates were kept in check.

However, the policies and laws enacted during this period laid the foundation for a more just and equitable society, and helped to move the United States towards a more inclusive and democratic future. So Option D is correct

For more questions on Reconstruction visit:

https://brainly.com/question/13753522

#SPJ11

The best statement that describes how Shays's Rebellion and the Pennsylvania Mutiny affected Congress is A. Congress feared the spread of future rebellions and anarchy.

Shays's Rebellion was a tumultuous insurrection in western Massachusetts from 1786 to1787, spearheaded by aggrieved farmers disgruntled by oppressive taxes and unjust economic disparities. Similarly, the Pennsylvania Mutiny of 1783 brought about unrest when an assemblage of Continental Army personnel rebelled over unpaid recompenses.

Consequently, these episodes induced major apprehensions among Congress members concerning future rebellions, along with the apprehension that the nation was too powerless to establish order and avoid additional uprisings. Essentially, it seemed that the civil authority possessed inadequate potency foreseeable revolt prevention.

Find out more on Shay's Rebellion at https://brainly.com/question/24848934

#SPJ1

Internal migration within the United States was a significant and complex process that had a profound impact on the country's economy, culture, and society.  

The relative importance of internal migration within the United States in the period from 1900 to 1970 can be evaluated by considering several factors, including:

The number of people who moved: Internal migration within the United States increased significantly during this period, with millions of people moving from rural areas to urban centers in search of work and economic opportunities.

The reasons for migration: Migration during this period was driven by a variety of factors, including the growth of industrial cities, the expansion of the railroad and highway networks, and the development of new industries in the West and South.

The impact on the economy: Internal migration had a significant impact on the economy, as it helped to fuel the growth of cities and the development of new industries.

Learn more about Internal migration visit: brainly.com/question/30407735

#SPJ4

Answer:

"The Vice President of the United States shall be President of the Senate, but shall have no Vote, unless they be equally divided" (U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 3). Since 1789, 297 tie-breaking votes have been cast.

Explanation:

The Similarities and Differences  between  Cesar Chavez/Dolores Huerta leaders are discussed as

Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. and Cesar Chavez were civil rights leaders, yet their actions and views were very different. Dr. King pushed for nonviolent protest, whereas Chavez emphasized labor strikes and boycotts.

Malcolm X was a notable civil rights leader who pushed for self-defense and black nationalism, but the Black Panther Party was known for armed neighborhood patrols and calls for socialist revolution.

Dr. King, Chavez, Malcolm X, and the Black Panther Party were all civil rights activists, but their acts and ideas were very different.

Learn more about  Cesar Chavez, here:

https://brainly.com/question/27534117

#SPJ1

Self-serving individuals undermined the Reconstruction effort in several ways. They insisted on having their own way, refused to compromise on key points, misused government tax dollars, and accepted bribes while overspending money.

These actions hindered the progress of Reconstruction and impeded the goal of rebuilding the post-Civil War South. Self-serving individuals played a detrimental role in the Reconstruction effort following the American Civil War. Firstly, they insisted on having their own way, prioritizing their personal interests over the greater objective of rebuilding the war-torn South. This attitude led to conflicts and disagreements, hindering the cooperation necessary for successful Reconstruction.

Secondly, self-serving individuals refused to compromise on key points. Instead of finding common ground and seeking solutions that would benefit the entire nation, they remained steadfast in their positions, causing political gridlock and preventing meaningful progress. Additionally, some individuals misused government tax dollars during Reconstruction. Instead of utilizing funds for their intended purpose of rebuilding infrastructure, improving education, and aiding the formerly enslaved population, corrupt officials and opportunists diverted funds for personal gain. This misuse of public funds further hindered the overall success of Reconstruction.

Furthermore, self-serving individuals engaged in bribery and overspent money. Accepting bribes compromised the integrity of government officials and undermined the trust of the public. Overspending money on unnecessary projects or personal luxuries diverted resources from the crucial task of rebuilding the South and assisting those affected by the war.

Learn more about Self-serving here: brainly.com/question/30760175

#SPJ11

In many cultures, formal school instruction typically begins around the age of six or seven.

At this age, children are considered to have reached a level of cognitive and social development that allows them to engage in structured learning activities. Formal schooling provides a systematic and organized approach to education, focusing on academic subjects such as reading, writing, mathematics, and science. It also helps children develop important social skills, such as interacting with peers and following instructions from teachers.

The age of six or seven is generally chosen as the starting point for formal schooling for several reasons. Firstly, it aligns with the stage of development when children have acquired basic language skills and are ready to learn more complex concepts. At this age, children have developed the necessary attention span and cognitive abilities to engage in formal instruction.

Secondly, beginning formal schooling at a consistent age allows for efficient organization and planning of educational systems. It also provides a standardized framework for curriculum development and assessment. Lastly, starting school at a relatively uniform age facilitates socialization and peer interactions, as children enter the educational system together and can form friendships and learn together.

Overall, the age of six or seven is a common starting point for formal school instruction in many cultures, providing children with structured learning environments and opportunities for academic and social development.

To learn more about social development click here: brainly.com/question/30756287

#SPJ11

Answer:

yes they traded food through rivers

Explanation:

Harriet Taylor, in 1851, published "The Enfranchisement of Women," which included arguments for women to receive equal rights, education, suffrage and civic participation, but did not explicitly argue for women's employment. The correct option is D.

Harriet Taylor was a philosopher and women's rights advocate who co-authored several works with her husband, John Stuart Mill. "The Enfranchisement of Women" was one of her most important contributions to the women's rights movement. The essay argued for women's equality in various spheres of life, including education, politics, and the workplace.

Taylor believed that women's exclusion from these areas was a form of oppression and that granting women equal rights would benefit society as a whole. In the essay, Taylor argued that women should have the right to vote and participate in civic affairs, which would give them greater political power and influence.

The correct option is D.

To know more about Harriet Taylor, click here.

https://brainly.com/question/2515982

#SPJ4

In Homer's epic poem, "The Odyssey," Odysseus takes a long time to reveal his true identity to the Phaeacians for strategic reasons. After a decade-long war in Troy and a lengthy, arduous journey back home, Odysseus has faced numerous trials and dangers.

When Odysseus arrives in the land of the Phaeacians, he initially conceals his true name and introduces himself as a shipwrecked traveler named "Nobody." This pseudonym serves as a clever disguise and a way to protect himself from potential enemies or adversaries.

Odysseus has experienced firsthand the treachery and hostility of various individuals and creatures throughout his journey. By keeping his identity hidden, he can assess the character and intentions of those around him before deciding to trust them.

Odysseus wants to ensure that the Phaeacians are friendly and hospitable before revealing his true name, as this knowledge could potentially put him at risk.

To learn more about Homer's.

Click here:brainly.com/question/29331716

#SPJ11

The detail from the text that best supports the answer to Part A is D. "From its beginning in this country, the suffrage movement met determined opposition from women as well as from men."

This detail underscores the extensive and enduring opposition that the suffrage movement encountered throughout its history.

It highlights the significant challenges faced by suffragettes as they fought for the right to vote, not only against men but also against women who opposed the movement. This opposition from both genders suggests that the struggle for suffrage was a formidable and protracted battle, requiring immense perseverance and resilience.

By acknowledging the broad and persistent opposition faced by suffragettes, this detail reinforces the notion that the fight to secure the vote was arduous and hard-fought.

For more such questions on the suffrage movement: https://brainly.com/question/751172

#SPJ11

The groups that led the 1848 revolutions in Europe shared common goals and grievances against the existing political and social order. They were driven by desires for political liberalization, national unity, and social reforms.

The groups leading the 1848 revolutions in Europe, often referred to as liberals, shared a common desire for political change and greater civil liberties. They aimed to establish constitutional monarchies or democratic republics, seeking to replace absolute or autocratic rule with more representative systems of government.

Additionally, these groups advocated for national unity and self-determination, aiming to unite fragmented regions and ethnic groups under a shared national identity. They also sought social reforms, including improvements in working conditions, labor rights, and the alleviation of socioeconomic inequalities. The revolutions of 1848 were driven by these shared goals and grievances, although their outcomes varied across different countries and regions.

To learn more about social reforms click here :

brainly.com/question/3332629

#SPJ11

Martin Van Buren's long and mostly successful career in politics may be attributed in large part to his being a skilled and strategic political operator.

Van Buren's ability to navigate the complex political landscape of his time, build alliances, and master the art of party politics played a significant role in his success.

Van Buren's rise to prominence can be attributed to his astute understanding of political dynamics. He was a skilled organizer and played a crucial role in building the Democratic-Republican Party, which later became the Democratic Party. Van Buren served as a U.S. senator, governor of New York, secretary of state, and vice president before eventually becoming the eighth president of the United States.

One of Van Buren's key strengths was his ability to form and maintain political alliances. He was adept at forging connections with influential politicians and building support networks, which helped him navigate the ever-changing political landscape. Van Buren's organizational skills and political acumen were evident in his role as a key strategist behind Andrew Jackson's successful presidential campaign. He utilized his expertise to establish a strong party infrastructure and mobilize grassroots support.

Furthermore, Van Buren's pragmatic approach to politics contributed to his success. He was known for his ability to find common ground and compromise when necessary, making him a skilled negotiator. This allowed him to navigate contentious issues such as the divisive debate over slavery. Van Buren's political agility and willingness to adapt to changing circumstances helped him maintain a successful career in politics for a considerable period.

In summary, Martin Van Buren's long and mostly successful career in politics can be attributed to his strategic political maneuvering, ability to form alliances, and pragmatic approach to governance. His organizational skills, political acumen, and talent for building support networks played crucial roles in his rise to power and sustained influence in American politics.

to learn more about Martin Van Buren' click here; brainly.com/question/31838305

#SPJ11

Argument For:
Egalitarian policies aim to reduce income inequality and promote equal opportunities for all individuals. From a utilitarian perspective, this could lead to greater overall happiness for the majority of people. When resources and opportunities are more evenly distributed, more people can fulfill their basic needs, enjoy a higher standard of living, and experience a sense of fairness in society. This increased well-being for the many can result in the greatest happiness for the greatest number, which aligns with the utilitarian principle.

Argument Against:
On the other hand, some argue that egalitarian policies may have negative consequences that outweigh the benefits, making them inconsistent with the utilitarian framework. Implementing these policies could involve higher taxes or redistributive measures, which may discourage entrepreneurship, innovation, and hard work, as people may perceive fewer incentives to excel. This, in turn, could lead to slower economic growth and potentially reduce the overall happiness of the population. In this scenario, utilitarians might argue that the greatest happiness for the greatest number would be better achieved by focusing on policies that promote economic growth, rather than strict income equality.

Learn more about egalitarian here : brainly.com/question/29698776

#SPJ11

The two phrases that contribute to the accusatory tone of the excerpt are:

"Our repeated petitions have been answered only by repeated injury."

This phrase implies that the government has repeatedly ignored or dismissed the requests for redress, resulting in harm or mistreatment to the people. It conveys a sense of frustration and accusation.

"A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act, which may define a tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people."

This phrase directly accuses the Prince (referring to King George III of Britain) of having the qualities and actions that define a tyrant. It implies that the ruler is unfit to govern a free people and holds a critical and accusatory tone.

These phrases highlight the grievances and frustrations of the writer (Thomas Jefferson) and contribute to the accusatory tone of the excerpt.

Learn more about accusatory tone here:

https://brainly.com/question/18682476

#SPJ1

Answer:

d. native americans have always been recognized as citizens of the united states. since they were here firts

Explanation:

Horatio Greenough believed that american buildings should be designed like  gothic cathedrals, classical temples, and ships.

The correct option is D.

Horatio Greenough believed that American buildings should be designed in a manner that reflects the culture and values of the United States.

He thought that the buildings should be designed in a way that would reflect the grandeur and majesty of the country, as well as its democratic ideals. To achieve this, he proposed that American buildings should be designed like gothic cathedrals, classical temples, and ships. He thought that these designs would allude to the power, authority, and nobility of America, while also conveying the ideals of democracy and equality.

He argued that the use of these designs would help the United States to develop a unique architectural style of its own, distinct from that of Europe. He believed that the use of these designs would help to create a sense of national identity and pride in the country.

To know more about Horatio Greenough, click here:

https://brainly.com/question/1358304

#SPJ4

The Question -

Horatio greenough believed that american buildings should be designed like:

group of answer choices

A) gothic cathedrals

B) classical temples

C) ships factories

D) All of the above

Shakespeare provides evidence of the differences between Juliet and her mother through their contrasting attitudes towards love, marriage, and their relationship with Romeo.

In Shakespeare's play "Romeo and Juliet," he portrays Juliet and her mother as contrasting characters with distinct personalities and perspectives. Firstly, their differing attitudes towards love and marriage highlight their dissimilarities. Juliet is portrayed as a romantic idealist who falls deeply in love with Romeo and is willing to defy societal expectations and risk everything for their love. In contrast, her mother, Lady Capulet, approaches marriage as a practical matter guided by social status and wealth, showing little consideration for personal feelings or desires.

Furthermore, the mother-daughter relationship between Juliet and Lady Capulet reveals their contrasting personalities. Lady Capulet is depicted as distant and unsupportive, displaying a lack of emotional connection and understanding towards Juliet's desires and aspirations. Their interactions are often formal and strained, with Lady Capulet primarily concerned with Juliet's obedience and conformity to societal norms. On the other hand, Juliet is portrayed as a passionate and independent young woman who seeks genuine love and autonomy, leading to a growing divide between her and her mother. Lastly, the way both characters relate to Romeo underscores their differences. Juliet sees Romeo as her true love and equal, sharing a deep emotional bond with him. In contrast, Lady Capulet views Romeo as an insignificant suitor and urges Juliet to consider a more advantageous marriage. This disparity in their perceptions of Romeo further highlights their contrasting perspectives on love, romance, and individual choice.

Overall, Shakespeare uses these elements to illustrate the stark differences between Juliet and her mother. Juliet represents youth, idealism, and the pursuit of personal happiness, while Lady Capulet embodies traditional values, social expectations, and the prioritization of societal status. Their contrasting views and attitudes contribute to the conflict and tragedy that unfolds in the play.

Learn more about Shakespeare : brainly.com/question/25603233
#SPJ11

Supporters of the slaveocracy attempted to determine the new Kansas government in order to maintain control in the U.S. Congress.

They hoped to make Kansas a slave state, which would tip the balance of power in Congress in favor of slave-owning states. This led to a violent conflict in Kansas known as "Bleeding Kansas" and highlighted the deep divide between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces in the United States.

In the 1850s, the issue of slavery was a major political and social issue in the United States. Supporters of the slaveocracy, particularly in the South, feared that the growing anti-slavery movement would lead to the abolition of slavery and the loss of their economic and political power. In an attempt to maintain control in Congress, they attempted to determine the new Kansas government and make it a slave state, despite the fact that the majority of settlers in Kansas were anti-slavery.

This led to a violent conflict in Kansas known as "Bleeding Kansas" as pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces fought for control. The conflict highlighted the deep divide between pro-slavery and anti-slavery forces in the United States and contributed to the growing tensions that would eventually lead to the Civil War. Despite their efforts, Kansas eventually entered the Union as a free state, and the balance of power in Congress shifted in favor of free states.

Learn more about slaveocracy here: brainly.com/question/17432274

#SPJ11

There are many factors that could have influenced President Kennedy's decision to answer the first letter rather than the second letter, including the content of the letters themselves, the urgency of the issues raised in the letters, and the priorities and goals of the administration at the time.

Conclusion on President Kennedy might have drawn from his decision to answer the first letter rather than the second letter. However, it is possible that President Kennedy may have prioritized answering the first letter because it contained information or concerns that were more relevant or pressing to the administration at the time.

Because of this he believed that addressing the issues raised in the first letter would have a more significant impact on the lives of the individuals or communities involved.  

Learn more about President Kennedy's visit: brainly.com/question/21223104

#SPJ4

In McCulloch v. Maryland, the Supreme Court ruled that the federal government had powers beyond what were explicitly stated in the Constitution. Option A

This decision established the concept of implied powers, which allows Congress to pass laws necessary for carrying out its express powers. The case arose when the state of Maryland attempted to tax the Bank of the United States, a federal institution.

Chief Justice John Marshall, writing for the majority, held that states could not tax the federal government because it would interfere with the government's ability to carry out its duties.

Marshall further stated that the federal government had the authority to create a national bank, even though the Constitution did not specifically grant this power. This decision was a significant victory for the federal government and established the supremacy of federal law over state law.

The ruling also upheld the idea that the federal government had the power to establish institutions and programs necessary for the well-being of the nation.

Overall, the McCulloch v. Maryland decision helped to strengthen the power of the federal government and played an essential role in shaping the relationship between the federal government and the states. So Option A is correct.

For more question on government visit:

https://brainly.com/question/1772602

#SPJ11

Answer:

n order to understand Austria’s role in the dissolution of the German Democratic Republic (GDR) and the country’s position toward German Unification, one needs to analyze the events of 1989-1990 against a broader historical background. On the one hand, this consists of long-term developments, such as Austria’s relationship to the two German states prior to 1989 and the increasing permeability of the Austrian-Hungarian border in the 1970s and 1980s. On the other hand, Vienna’s integration policy, which changed in 1987, should be taken into account. This Working Paper introduces this historical background and is structured into four parts. The first section examines Austria’s relations with East Germany from the 1970s and West Germany’s reactions to this process. The second section offers a concise overview of Austrian-Hungarian relations in the 1970s and 1980s, focusing on the gradual transformation of the border regime, its significance for the events at the Austrian-Hungarian border in 1989 and their contribution to the collapse of the East German regime. Third, the Working Paper then interprets Austrian attitudes and policies towards the GDR and the question of German Unification in the crucial months from November 1989 to January 1990. In the final section, the Working Paper highlights how the process of German Unification influenced Austria’s ambitions to join the European Communities