Hello. This question is incomplete. The full question is:
One central idea of Morris’s essay is that getting rid of things can be a relief for people. Which two of these details help illustrate that idea?
Choose one answer from each group. Type the LETTER ONLY for each answer in the correct blank.
Type A, B, C, or D for Blank 1.
A.Their houses are filled with an undigested mass of things, like the terminal moraine where a glacier dumps at length everything it has picked up during its progress through the lands.
B.Truly, on all sides we are beset, and we go lumbering along through life like a ship encrusted with barnacles.
C.Such things as we cannot give away, and have not the courage to destroy, we stack in the garret.
D.Then, as we breathe more freely in the clear space that we have made for ourselves, we grow aware that we must not relax our vigilance.
Type E, F, G, or H for Blank 2.
E.The host must receive gifts from every little guest, and provide in return some little remembrance for each to take home.
F.We cannot go to luncheon and meet our friends but we must receive a token to carry away.
G.And to think that there was a time when folk had not even that hope!
H.To think one could not even then be clear of things, and make at least a fresh start! That must, indeed, have been in the childhood of the race.
Answer:
D and H
Explanation:
Option D shows how when we get rid of unnecessary and excess things, we are more light, breathe more freely and have a comfortable feeling of freedom and satisfaction. Option H complements this thinking, as it shows that when we get rid of these things, we can start from scratch, correct errors, promote a healthier and more comfortable environment, without excesses, without waste and lighter and more beneficial.
son was going away, he must not be angry. which verb mood
Answer:
Angry obviously
Explanation:
Answer:
Angry
Explanation:
Angry is a verb to describes feeling so angry would be the verb that shows mood
PLZ give me brainliest
In the Golden touch
Who is the narrator in the story?
2. Is the narrative text written in first person, third person omniscient, or third person limited?
3. How does the author's choice of narrator contribute to the story? Why is it important?
4. Do you consider the story's narrator to be reliable? Why or why not?
5. How would the story be different if the narrator was a different character?
Answer:
no one knows the answer.
Explanation:
The narrator that's in the story is an omniscient narrator.
It should be noted that the story was told in the third person omniscient view. This is where the author refers to the characters as he or she.
Also, the narrator has access to the internal thoughts of the characters. It should also be noted that the thoughts of the characters are used to convey their emotions and to show their concerns to the readers.
The narrator's story is reliable. The narrator made use of the characters thought as Midas' greed for gold was illustrated.
Read related link on:
https://brainly.com/question/19954607
Please help!! ASAP!
The passage below contains of which of the following?
My aunt passed away just after World War II
A. Euphemism
B. Doublespeak
C. Inflated language
D. All of the above
Thank you
Answer:
it says all of the above