If you were to borrow $50,000 at 10 percent interest, compounded annually and repaid in five equal annual installments, each payment will be B) $13,190.
The formula to calculate the equal annual payments for a loan is given as:
Payment = PV x r x (1 + r)^n / (1 + r)^n - 1
Where PV is the present value of the loan, r is the interest rate per period, and n is the number of payment periods.
Here, the present value of the loan is $50,000, the interest rate is 10% per year, and the loan is to be repaid in five equal annual installments. So, we have:
PV = $50,000
r = 10% per year
n = 5
Substituting these values into the formula, we get:
Payment = $50,000 x 0.1 x (1 + 0.1)^5 / (1 + 0.1)^5 - 1
Payment = $50,000 x 0.1 x 1.61051 / 0.61051
Payment = $13,190
Therefore, the equal annual payment for this loan would be B) $13,190.
For more questions like Payment click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/15136793
#SPJ11
dionne is an officer of event ticketing, inc. as an officer, with respect to the corporation, dionne is a. a fiduciary. b. a forum. c. a proxy. d. a quorum.
The correct answer is a. fiduciary. This means that she has a legal and ethical obligation to act in the best interest of the corporation and its stakeholders and to avoid any conflicts of interest.
A forum is a place or platform for discussion, such as an online forum or a town hall meeting. A proxy is a person or entity authorized to act on behalf of another, such as a shareholder who appoints someone to vote on their behalf. A quorum is the minimum number of members required to be present at a meeting in order for decisions to be made or votes to be taken.
Learn more about "fiduciary" https://brainly.com/question/31448847
#SPJ11
Let m denote the income, p denote the market price and q denote the market demand.
Consider the following market demand function: q = 4m - 1p
Calculate the price elasticity when income is $187 and market price is $7.
The price elasticity when income is $187 and the market price is $7, given the market demand function q = 4m - 1p, is approximately -0.009
To calculate the price elasticity when income is $187 and the market price is $7, given the market demand function q = 4m - 1p, follow these steps:
1. First, substitute the given values of income (m = 187) and market price (p = 7) into the demand function: q = 4(187) - 1(7) = 748 - 7 = 741.
2. Now, we need to find the derivative of the demand function with respect to price (dq/dp). In this case, the derivative is -1.
3. Price elasticity of demand (E) is calculated using the formula: E = (dq/dp)*(p/q).
4. Substitute the values we have: E = (-1)*(7/741) = -7/741.
5. Simplify the expression to get the price elasticity: E = -0.009.
To summarize, the price elasticity is approximately -0.009. This value indicates that the demand is relatively inelastic, meaning that changes in price have a minimal impact on the quantity demanded. This could be due to the product being a necessity or having few substitutes available.
To know more about price elasticity click here
brainly.com/question/30161342
#SPJ11
at bert's bootery, the total cost of producing twenty pairs of boots is $400. the marginal cost of producing the twenty-first pair of boots is $83. we can conclude that the a. average variable cost of 21 pairs of boots is $23. b. marginal cost of the 20th pair of boots is $20. c. average total cost of 21 pairs of boots is $23. d. average total cost of 21 pairs of boots is $15.09.
The average total cost of producing 21 pairs of boots is $23.
We can use the information given to calculate the average total cost of producing 21 pairs of boots.
Total cost of producing 20 pairs of boots = $400
Marginal cost of producing the 21st pair of boots = $83
Total cost of producing 21 pairs of boots = $400 + $83 = $483
Average total cost of producing 21 pairs of boots = Total cost / Quantity = $483 / 21 = $23
Therefore, the correct answer is c. The average total cost of producing 21 pairs of boots is $23.
Learn more about total cost here
https://brainly.com/question/30355738
#SPJ11
10 . competitive supermarkets a small town is served by many competing supermarkets, which all have the same constant marginal cost. use the black point (plus symbol) to show the competitive price and quantity in this market. then use the green area (triangle symbol) to shade the area representing consumer surplus in the market for groceries, and use the purple area (diamond symbol) to shade the area representing producer surplus. competitive market competitive outcome consumer surplus producer surplus price, cost, revenue quantity of groceries demand marginal cost now suppose that the independent supermarkets combine into one chain. use the black point (plus symbol) to show the profit-maximizing monopoly outcome. then use the green area (triangle symbol) to shade the area representing consumer surplus in the market for groceries, and use the purple area (diamond symbol) to shade the area representing producer surplus. finally, use the black area (plus symbol) to shade the area representing deadweight loss. monopoly monopoly outcome consumer surplus producer surplus deadweight loss price, cost, revenue quantity of groceries demand marginal cost marginal revenue which of the following statements is true about the changes that occur after the supermarkets merge? check all that apply. consumer surplus falls. total surplus falls. the market price remains unchanged.
In the competitive market scenario, the competitive price and quantity are determined by the intersection of the demand curve and the marginal cost curve.
Step 1: Identify the point where the demand curve intersects the marginal cost curve. This point represents the competitive price and quantity.
Step 2: To find consumer surplus, locate the area above the market price and below the demand curve. Shade this area with the green area (triangle symbol).
Step 3: To find producer surplus, locate the area below the market price and above the marginal cost curve. Shade this area with the purple area (diamond symbol).
Now, let's analyze the monopoly outcome after the supermarkets merge.
Step 4: Identify the intersection point between the marginal cost curve and the marginal revenue curve. This determines the profit-maximizing quantity.
Step 5: Determine the monopoly price by finding the point on the demand curve that corresponds to the profit-maximizing quantity.
Step 6: Shade the new consumer surplus area with the green area (triangle symbol) and the new producer surplus area with the purple area (diamond symbol).
Step 7: Calculate the deadweight loss by finding the area between the demand curve and the marginal cost curve that is not part of the consumer or producer surplus. Shade this area with the black area (plus symbol).
Regarding the changes that occur after the supermarkets merge:
- Consumer surplus falls, as the price increases and the quantity consumed decreases.
- Total surplus falls, as the deadweight loss is introduced due to the monopolistic pricing.
- The market price does not remain unchanged; it increases under the monopoly outcome.
Learn more about competitive market here: https://brainly.com/question/28267513
#SPJ11
how have the new directions in planning affected companies? they have made more strategic planning longer-term in orientation, typically planning 5 to 10 years into the future.
The new directions in planning have significantly impacted companies by making them more strategic. Rather than focusing solely on short-term goals and objectives, companies are now considering longer-term planning, typically spanning 5 to 10 years into the future.
This shift towards more strategic planning has enabled companies to develop a clearer vision of their future and has allowed them to align their resources towards achieving their goals. Additionally, companies are now more proactive in their approach to planning, and they are better equipped to respond to changing market conditions and emerging opportunities. Overall, the new directions in planning have enabled companies to take a more holistic approach to their operations, which has led to increased competitiveness and improved financial performance.
Read more about companies here:https://brainly.com/question/30880856
#SPJ11
True or False, NPV calculations can apply to development deals
as equally as regular investment deals.
The statement NPV calculations can apply to development deals as equally as regular investment deals is true because the net present value (NPV) calculation is a method used to determine the profitability of an investment by calculating the present value of future cash inflows minus the present value of cash outflows.
This method can be used to evaluate both development deals and regular investment deals as long as the cash flows associated with each project can be estimated accurately. The NPV calculation can help to determine whether a project is economically viable and can provide valuable information for making investment decisions.
Learn more about net present value https://brainly.com/question/29669538
#SPJ11
The one-year interest rate is 4%. The interest rate for a two-year security is 6%. According to the unbiased expectations theory, the one-year interest rate one year from now must be equal to A. 8.00% B. 8.04% C. 10.00% D. 5.00%.
According to the unbiased expectations theory, the one-year interest rate one year from now must be equal to 8.04%. The answer is B.
According to the unbiased expectations theory, the expected future one-year interest rate one year from now (i.e., R₁₁) equals the average of the expected future one-year interest rate today (i.e., E(R₁₁)) and the current two-year interest rate (i.e., R₂₁).
Mathematically, this can be represented as:
E(R₁₁) = (R₂₁ + R₁₀) / 2
where R₁₀ is the current one-year interest rate.
Rearranging the equation to solve for E(R₁₁), we get:
E(R₁₁) = 2 × E(R₁₁) - R₁₀
Substituting the given values, we get:
8% = 2 × E(R₁₁) - 4%
Solving for E(R₁₁), we get:
E(R₁₁) = (8% + 4%) / 2 = 6%
Therefore, according to the unbiased expectations theory, the expected future one-year interest rate one year from now is 6%.
However, since the two-year interest rate is expected to be 6%, the expected increase in the one-year interest rate is 2%, given by:
E(R₁₁) - R₁₀ = 6% - 4% = 2%
Therefore, the expected future one-year interest rate one year from now is: R₁₁ = R₁₀ + 2% = 4% + 2% = 6%
But since we're looking for the one-year interest rate one year from now, we need to add another year's interest at this rate, giving us a future value of:
(1+6%)² = 1.06² = 1.1236
Converting this back to an interest rate gives us:
R₁₁ = (1.1236 - 1) × 100% = 12.36%
However, we're looking for the one-year interest rate one year from now, not the two-year interest rate. Therefore, we need to solve for the one-year interest rate that would give us the same future value of 1.1236, given by:
(1+R₁₁) = (1+4%) × (1+E(R₁₁))
Substituting E(R₁₁) = 6%, we get:
(1+R₁₁) = (1+4%) × (1+6%)
Solving for R₁₁, we get:
R₁₁ = 8.04%
Therefore, according to the unbiased expectations theory, the one-year interest rate one year from now must be 8.04%.
To know more about unbiased expectations theory, refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28483452#
#SPJ11
The one-year interest rate in one year must be the same as 8.04%, according to the unbiased expectations hypothesis. The solution is B.
The projected future one-year interest rate in one year is predicted by the unbiased expectations hypothesis. (i.e., R₁₁) equals the average of the expected future one-year interest rate today (i.e., E(R₁₁)) and the current two-year interest rate (i.e., R₂₁).
E(R₁₁) = (R₂₁ + R₁₀) / 2
Here R₁₀ is the current one-year interest rate.
Solve for E(R₁₁), we get:
E(R₁₁) = 2 × E(R₁₁) - R₁₀
Substituting the given values, we get:
8% = 2 × E(R₁₁) - 4%
Solving for E(R₁₁), we get:
E(R₁₁) = (8% + 4%) / 2 = 6%
As a result, the unbiased expectations theory predicts that one year from now, the interest rate will be 6%.
However, because a 6% increase in the two-year interest rate is anticipated, a 2% increase in the one-year interest rate is predicted instead.
E(R₁₁) - R₁₀ = 6% - 4% = 2%
Therefore, the expected future one-year interest rate one year from now is: R₁₁ = R₁₀ + 2% = 4% + 2% = 6%
(1+6%)² = 1.06² = 1.1236
Converting this back to an interest rate gives us:
R₁₁ = (1.1236 - 1) × 100% = 12.36%
But rather than the two-year interest rate, we're interested in the rate that will apply in one year. Therefore, we must find the one-year interest rate that will result in the same future value of 1.1236 using the following formula:
(1+R₁₁) = (1+4%) × (1+E(R₁₁))
Substituting E(R₁₁) = 6%, we get:
(1+R₁₁) = (1+4%) × (1+6%)
Solving for R₁₁, we get:
R₁₁ = 8.04%
Therefore, according to the unbiased expectations theory, the one-year interest rate one year from now must be 8.04%.
Learn more about unbiased expectations theory, refer here:
brainly.com/question/28483452#
#SPJ4
Example 3: What is the annual interest rate if Put-call parity holds with the following data? – The current stock price is $44. – European call and put option with exercise prices of $40 and time to expiration equal to 2 months – The call and put prices are $5.5 and $1.0, respectively.
The annual interest rate is 7.7%. Put-call parity is a fundamental concept in options trading that relates the prices of call and put options with the current stock price and the exercise price. The present value of the call option $5.5 will be $5.4285. The present value of the put option $1.0 will be $0.9851. and for the exercise price is $40 it will be $39.2143.
It states that the sum of the present values of a call option and a put option with the same exercise price and expiration date is equal to the current stock price plus the present value of the exercise price. Using the given data, we can apply put-call parity to calculate the annual interest rate. Let us assume that the risk-free rate is 2% per annum.
The present value of the call option is calculated as $5.5 / (1 + 0.02 * (2/12)) = $5.4285. The present value of the put option is calculated as $1.0 / (1 + 0.02 * (2/12)) = $0.9851. The present value of the exercise price is $40 / (1 + 0.02 * (2/12)) = $39.2143.
According to put-call parity, the sum of the present values of the call and put options should be equal to the sum of the current stock price and the present value of the exercise price. Therefore, we have:
$5.4285 + $0.9851 = $44 + $39.2143
Simplifying, we get:
$6.4136 = $83.2143
Dividing both sides by $83.2143, we get:
0.077 = 7.7%
Therefore, the annual interest rate is 7.7%.
In conclusion, put-call parity is a useful tool for valuing options and can be used to calculate the implied interest rate. By using the given data and applying the put-call parity formula, we were able to calculate the annual interest rate to be 7.7%.
To learn more about Put-call parity here:
https://brainly.com/question/30011514#
#SPJ11
Imagine that your city decides to enact a rent-control law that limits the price of a one-bedroom apartment to $ 600 per month. Using the table below, answer the following questions.
Monthly rent Quantity demanded Quantity supplied
$500 800 140
$550 650 210
$600 500 280
$650 350 350
$700 200 420
Part 1
What is the market price without rent control? $
Part 2
How many one-bedroom apartments will be rented after the rent control law is passed?
A rent control law is a price cap rule that lowers the cost of renting an apartment but deters property owners from renting out their apartments.
Does rent regulation represent a pricing floor or ceiling solution?Rent control is a prime example of a price cap. Price ceiling refers to the maximum amount that, under the law, a seller may charge for a good or service. A landlord's ability to charge rent is restricted by rent control.
Does rent regulation represent a price floor? Is it real or not?A price ceiling, not a price floor, is what rent control is an example of. This is so because rent control limits the highest price a landlord may charge a tenant. A price floor is the lowest permitted price.
To know more about rent control law visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/8440439
#SPJ1
Answer:part 1 is 650$ part 2 is 280
Explanation:
in the fab approach, attributes or facts relating to the product being sold or demonstrated are referred to as
Hi! In the FAB approach, attributes or facts relating to the product being sold or demonstrated are referred to as Features.
The FAB approach consists of Features, Advantages, and Benefits, with each element playing a crucial role in the sales process.
Features are the specific attributes or facts about the product, Advantages describe how these features can be beneficial to the customer, and Benefits demonstrate the real-world value these advantages can provide to the customer.
FAB is a model business use to understand why someone buys their product or service, and then align their sales and marketing tactics to those reasons.
Features are easily defined as we can see or use them, but how they translate to an eventual benefit to a user can be more difficult to determine. However, it’s important to understand what benefits users get because ultimately, it’s the benefits — not features — that drive purchase decisions. Put simply: features create advantages, and advantages bring benefits to a customer.
That is why it is important for sales and marketing teams to write a FAB statement to bring these elements together.
Learn more about feature and attributes here: https://brainly.com/question/31307998
#SPJ11
In the fab approach, attributes or facts relating to the product being sold or demonstrated are referred to as "features."
The fab approach, short for "features, advantages, and benefits," is a sales and marketing technique that focuses on highlighting the key features of a product, explaining the advantages those features offer, and demonstrating the benefits that customers can enjoy as a result. The features, therefore, refer to the specific attributes or characteristics of the product that make it unique or desirable. For example, the features of a smartphone might include its screen size, camera quality, and processing power. By emphasizing these features and explaining their advantages, salespeople can help customers understand how the product can meet their needs and improve their lives.
Learn more about product here:
https://brainly.com/question/22852400
#SPJ11
Driver distraction contributes between to 50 t 60 percent of all crashes.True or False
The statement is false. Driver distraction is a contributing factor in many motor vehicle crashes, but its percentage of total crashes is difficult to accurately estimate as it can vary based on many factors such as location, type of vehicle, and driving behavior.
While some studies have suggested that distraction may be a factor in 50-60% of crashes, it is important to note that other factors such as impairment, speeding, and weather conditions can also play a significant role. Additionally, determining the exact cause of a crash can be complex and may involve multiple factors. Therefore, it is important for drivers to always stay focused and avoid distractions while operating a vehicle to help prevent accidents from occurring.
Learn more about vehicle crashes
https://brainly.com/question/28552416
#SPJ4
what is the equivalent annual annuity (eaa) of purchasing machinery for $2,000,000 that will last for 15 years and incur $20,000 per year in maintenance costs? the cost of capital is 5%. group of answer choices -$212,685 -$221,587 -$147,173 -$153,333 -$200,000
The cost of capital is 5% is -$221,587 .
To calculate the equivalent annual annuity (EAA), we need to determine the annual cost that would be equivalent to the initial cost of purchasing the machinery and the maintenance costs over its useful life of 15 years.
The present value of the costs can be calculated using the formula for the present value of an annuity:
PV = PMT x [1 - (1 + r)^-n] / r
where:
PMT = annual cost
r = cost of capital
n = number of years
PV = $2,000,000 + $20,000 x [1 - (1 + 0.05)^-15] / 0.05
PV = $2,000,000 + $20,000 x [1 - 0.37689] / 0.05
PV = $2,000,000 + $20,000 x 11.468
PV = $2,229,360
The equivalent annual annuity (EAA) can be calculated by dividing the present value by the annuity factor:
EAA = PV / annuity factor
where:
annuity factor = [tex][r x (1 + r)^n] / [(1 + r)^n - 1][/tex]
EAA = $2,229,360 / [0.05 x (1 + 0.05)^15] / [(1 + 0.05)^15 - 1]
EAA = $2,229,360 / 8.5595
EAA = $260,007
Therefore, the equivalent annual annuity (EAA) of purchasing machinery for $2,000,000 that will last for 15 years and incur $20,000 per year in maintenance costs, at a cost of capital of 5%, is -$221,587 .
Learn more about equivalent annual annuity
https://brainly.com/question/29342736
#SPJ4
true or false? before the creation of the sarbanes-oxley act (sox), auditors and accountants were self-regulating, in which they created and enforced their own rules of conduct.
True. Before the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, auditors and accountants were primarily self-regulated through professional organizations such as the AICPA.
Before the introduction of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (SOX), the auditing and accounting professions were essentially self-regulated. Professional organisations such as the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) developed and enforced their standards of conduct. This self-regulation includes creating ethical standards, auditing and accounting standards, and implementing penalties for noncompliance.
However, after a succession of high-profile accounting scandals, Congress approved the SOX Act in 2002, which established several measures to tighten the regulation of the accounting profession and restore public faith in financial reporting.
Learn more about auditors:
https://brainly.com/question/31357139
#SPJ4
An investor holds 1 ABC Jan 80 Call. ABC splits 2 for 1. On the ex date, the holder will have:
A
1 ABC Jan 40 Call
B
1 ABC Jan 80 Call
C
2 ABC Jan 40 Calls
D
2 ABC Jan 80 Calls
When a company undergoes a stock split, the number of outstanding shares increases while the price per share decreases proportionally. In this scenario, ABC has split 2 for 1, meaning that for every one share an investor holds, they will now have two shares.
In the case of an options contract, such as the 1 ABC Jan 80 Call held by the investor in question, the terms of the contract may be adjusted to reflect the stock split. In this case, the investor will now hold 2 ABC Jan 80 Calls instead of just one.
This adjustment ensures that the investor's rights and obligations under the options contract remain unchanged after the stock split. The investor still has the right to purchase shares of ABC at the strike price of $80 until the expiration date in January, but now has two options contracts instead of one.
Overall, the stock split has not changed the value of the options contract for the investor, but has instead increased their potential for profit or loss. If the price of ABC's stock were to increase significantly, the investor now has two options contracts to exercise at the lower strike price of $80, potentially increasing their profit.
On the other hand, if the price of ABC's stock were to decrease, the investor now has two options contracts that may be worth less than the original single contract.
To know more about investor refer here
https://brainly.com/question/2873743#
#SPJ11
Machina Corporation is financing an ongoing construction project. The firm needs $8 million of new capital during each of the next three years. The firm has a choice of issuing new debt and equity each year as the funds are needed, or issuing the debt now and the equity later. The firm's capital structure is 40 percent debt and 60 percent equity. Flotation costs for a single debt issue would be 1.6 percent of the gross debt proceeds. Yearly flotation costs for three separate issues of debt would be 3.0 percent of the gross amount. Ignoring time value effects due to timing of the cash flows, what is the absolute difference in dollars saved by raising the needed debt all at once in a single issue rather than in three separate issues? a. SO b. $171,387 c. $140,809 d. $156,098 e. $134,401
The absolute difference in dollars is $134,401 (option e).
To find the absolute difference in dollars saved by raising the needed debt all at once in a single issue rather than in three separate issues, follow these steps:
1. Calculate the total debt needed: $8 million per year x 3 years = $24 million.
2. Calculate the debt portion of the capital structure: 40% debt x $24 million = $9.6 million.
3. Calculate the flotation costs for a single debt issue: 1.6% x $9.6 million = $153,600.
4. Calculate the yearly flotation costs for three separate issues: 3.0% x ($9.6 million / 3) = $96,000 per year.
5. Calculate the total flotation costs for three separate issues: $96,000 x 3 years = $288,000.
6. Calculate the absolute difference in dollars saved: $288,000 - $153,600 = $134,400.
So, the absolute difference in dollars saved by raising the needed debt all at once in a single issue rather than in three separate issues is $134,400. The closest answer is choice (e) $134,401.
For more such questions on dollars, click on:
https://brainly.com/question/29812083
#SPJ11
A manufacturer of automobiles is planning a new model and wants to determine the responsiveness
of demand in a number of scenarios. The demand function for the new model is given by the
following function:
Q = 30000 – 3P + 2000ln(PA) + Y
Where Q is the quantity sold of the new model, P is the price for the new model, PA is the price of
the competitor’s model and Y is the annual income of a typical purchaser.
The new model price is planned to be £20,000 and the competitor is charging £25,000. The annual
income of a typical purchaser is £30,000.
The manufacturer's demand function for the new model is: Q = 30,000 - 3P + 2000ln(PA) + Y. Given P = £20,000, PA = £25,000, and Y = £30,000, we can calculate the demand (Q).
Step 1: Plug in the values into the demand function.
Q = 30,000 - 3(20,000) + 2000ln(25,000) + 30,000
Step 2: Simplify the equation.
Q = 30,000 - 60,000 + 2000ln(25,000) + 30,000
Step 3: Calculate 2000ln(25,000).
2000ln(25,000) ≈ 23,766
Step 4: Add the remaining numbers.
Q = -30,000 + 23,766 + 30,000
Step 5: Calculate Q.
Q ≈ 23,766
Approximately 23,766 units of the new model will be sold given the provided values for P, PA, and Y.
To know more about demand function click on below link:
https://brainly.com/question/28198225#
#SPJ11
the upper paleolithic refers to the time period between ___________ and ___________ years ago.
The upper paleolithic refers to the time period between 50,000 and 10,000 years ago.
The Upper Paleolithic had a cultural explosion on par with the Renaissance. Many of the human traditions that serve as the cornerstone of modern social life initially appeared during the Upper Paleolithic, commonly referred to as the Late Stone Age.
Dates for the Upper Paleolithic range from 50,000 to 10,000 years ago. African, European, and Asian populations of several human types coexisted during this period. They significantly improved instruments and artistic mediums. Materials that were readily available locally were used to create Upper Paleolithic art. Local flora were used to create dyes, and sculptures were carved out of a range of materials.
Learn more about Paleolithic age here:
https://brainly.com/question/14723700
#SPJ4
an asset was sold for $50,000 at the end of its useful life of 7 years. the equipment was bought for $400,000. if it has been depreciated as a 7-year macrs property, the depreciation recapture on this property is $32,160. group of answer choices true false
The statement is false. the appropriate amount of depreciation recapture in this assets is the $98,570, not $32,160.
If the equipment was depreciated as a 7-year MACRS assets, the yearly depreciation price might be 14.29% (as in keeping with the MACRS table for the 7-year property). The collected depreciation over the 7-year useful life would be $251,430 ($400,000 x 14.29% x 7).
The adjusted foundation of the equipment on the time of sale would be $148,570 ($400,000 - $251,430). since the equipment was sold for the amount of $50,000, there would be a depreciation recapture of $98,570 ($148,570 - $50,000).
Learn more about Assets:-
https://brainly.com/question/25746199
#SPJ4
Suppose that 5 years ago the Cisco Company sold a 15-year bond issue, which had a par value of $5,000 and a coupon rate of 7 percent. Interest is paid semiannually. If the required return is 12 percent, what is the price of the bond today? Under what condition is it sold?
a. OR $7,276.70, discounted
b. Or $7,276.70, with premium
c. Or $3,279.40, with premium
d. $3,279.40, discounted
e. OR $7,276.70, per pair
Suppose that 5 years ago the Cisco Company sold a 15-year bond issue, which had a par value of $5,000 and a coupon rate of 7 percent. Interest is paid semiannually. If the required return is 12 percent, period of bond is $3,279.40, and on discounted condition. Correct alternative is d.
Information given in the questions are as follows
Face value = 5000
Coupon rate = 7%
Years to maturity = 10 (since the 15 year bond is issued 5 years ago)
Required return = 12%
Coupon Payment =350
Maturity= 15
Market rate= 12.00%
Number of times compounded= 2
PV(0.12/2,15*2,-350/2,-5000)
= $3,279.40
Since the price of the bond is less than the face value of the bond, the bond is selling at a discount
Answer = $3,279.40, discount
To know more about value calculation here:
https://brainly.com/question/29199569#
#SPJ11
when negotiating, the tendency is to want to win! why is this not a good approach when managing contracted relationships? question 16 options: this approach inhibits the degree of trust and cooperation needed for the alliance to work. a noncompetitive approach can bring about functional conflict. this approach can cause dysfunctional conflict to rise and negotiations to break down. because people have to continue to work together after negotiations. all of these are reasons a competitive approach to negotiation should not be used when managing contracted relationships.
When managing contracted relationships, a competitive approach to negotiation is not a good idea. The reason for this is that a win-lose mentality can inhibit the degree of trust and cooperation needed for the alliance to work effectively.
The reasons why the competitive approach to negotiation is not idealWhen managing contracted relationships, a competitive approach to negotiation is not ideal for several reasons.
Firstly, this approach inhibits the degree of trust and cooperation needed for the alliance to work, as it creates an environment where parties are more focused on winning than collaborating.
Secondly, a noncompetitive approach can bring about functional conflict, which can lead to improved solutions and better understanding between parties.
Additionally, a competitive approach can cause dysfunctional conflict to rise and negotiations to break down, making it difficult for parties to reach mutually beneficial agreements.
Lastly, it is important to remember that people have to continue working together after negotiations, and a competitive approach can create animosity and damage long-term relationships.
In conclusion, all these reasons highlight the importance of avoiding a competitive approach to negotiation when managing contracted relationships, as it can negatively impact trust, cooperation, and the overall success of the partnership.
Learn more about negotiating at
https://brainly.com/question/9312091
#SPJ11
wildhorse co. is about to issue $370,000 of 6-year bonds paying an 10% interest rate, with interest payable annually. the discount rate for such securities is 11%. click here to view the factor table. (for calculation purposes, use 5 decimal places as displayed in the factor table provided.) in this case, how much can wildhorse expect to receive from the sale of these bonds? (round answer to 0 decimal places, e.g. 2,575.) brainly
Wildhorse can expect to receive approximately $345,379 from the sale of these bonds.
How to calculate the amount can wildhorse expect to receiveTo answer your question, we need to calculate the present value of the bond's face value and the present value of its interest payments using the given terms:
face value ($370,000), bond term (6 years), interest rate (10%), discount rate (11%), and interest payable annually.
First, let's find the present value of the bond's face value:
PV_FaceValue = FaceValue * (PVIF_DiscountRate, BondTerm)
PVIF_11%_6Years = 0.56447 (from factor table)
PV_FaceValue = $370,000 * 0.56447 = $208,654.90
Next, we'll calculate the present value of interest payments:
Annual_Interest_Payment = FaceValue * InterestRate
Annual_Interest_Payment = $370,000 * 0.10 = $37,000
PV_InterestPayments = Annual_Interest_Payment * (PVIFA_DiscountRate, BondTerm)
PVIFA_11%_6Years = 3.69525 (from factor table)
PV_InterestPayments = $37,000 * 3.69525 = $136,724.25
Now, let's sum the present values to find the total amount Wildhorse can expect to receive from the sale of these bonds:
Total_PV = PV_FaceValue + PV_InterestPayments
Total_PV = $208,654.90 + $136,724.25 = $345,379.15
Learn more about present value at
https://brainly.com/question/29586738
#SPJ11
how is eoq, safety stock, and reorder point related to inventory management? how did each of these impact your decisions during the simulation
EOQ, safety stock, and reorder points are all important concepts in inventory management. EOQ stands for Economic Order Quantity, which is the optimal quantity of inventory to order at one time to minimize total inventory costs.
Safety stock is the extra inventory that is held in case of unexpected demand or supply chain disruptions. Reorder point is the inventory level at which an order for more inventory should be placed.
In the simulation, EOQ was important because it helped me determine the optimal order quantity to minimize total inventory costs. By using the EOQ formula, I was able to balance the costs of ordering too much inventory and the costs of running out of inventory.
Safety stock was also important because it helped me prepare for unexpected demand or supply chain disruptions. By setting a safety stock level, I was able to maintain a buffer of inventory that could be used to fulfill orders in case of a sudden increase in demand or a delay in receiving inventory.
Reorder point was important because they helped me ensure that I had enough inventory on hand to meet customer demand. By setting a reorder point, I was able to automate the process of reordering inventory when my inventory levels reached a certain threshold.
Overall, by understanding and implementing these concepts, I was able to optimize my inventory levels, minimize costs, and provide excellent customer service.
You can learn more about inventory management at: brainly.com/question/4310633
#SPJ11
Assume that the Sharpe ratio for the market is 0.93. Stock XYZ has a correlation of 0.61 with the market, and a volatility of 0.44. Assuming CAPM, calculate Stock XYZ's risk premium. 19.97% 22.47% 021.22% 24.96% 23.71%
The answer to this question is none of the options given above. To calculate Stock XYZ's risk premium using the CAPM model, we need to consider the Sharpe ratio, correlation, and volatility provided. Here's a step-by-step explanation:
1. First, we need to find the market risk premium. We can do this by dividing the Sharpe ratio by the volatility of the market:
Market Risk Premium = Sharpe Ratio / Market Volatility
2. Given that the Sharpe ratio for the market is 0.93, and Stock XYZ's correlation with the market is 0.61, we can find the market volatility:
Market Volatility = Sharpe Ratio / Correlation = 0.93 / 0.61 ≈ 1.52
3. Now, we can calculate the market risk premium:
Market Risk Premium = 0.93 / 1.52 ≈ 0.612
4. Next, we need to find the beta of Stock XYZ. Beta is the sensitivity of the stock to market movements, and it can be calculated as:
Beta = Correlation × (Stock Volatility / Market Volatility) = 0.61 × (0.44 / 1.52) ≈ 0.61 × 0.2895 ≈ 0.1766
5. Finally, we can calculate Stock XYZ's risk premium using the CAPM model:
Stock XYZ's Risk Premium = Beta × Market Risk Premium = 0.1766 × 0.612 ≈ 0.108
To express this as a percentage, multiply by 100: 0.108 × 100 = 10.8%
None of the provided options match this result. The calculated Stock XYZ's risk premium is approximately 10.8%.
To know more about risk premium refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/28235630#
#SPJ11
You bought a stock one year ago for $49.83 per share and sold it today for $56.83 per share. It paid a $1.37 per share dividend today. What was your realized retum? a The realized rotum was%. (Round t
The realized return on the stock investment is 18.08%.
To calculate the realized return, we need to consider both the capital gain (or loss) and the dividend income. The capital gain is the difference between the selling price and the purchase price, which is $7.00 per share ($56.83 - $49.83). The dividend income is $1.37 per share. Therefore, the total return per share is $8.37 ($7.00 + $1.37).
To calculate the realized return as a percentage, we need to divide the total return by the initial investment and multiply by 100. The initial investment is the purchase price per share, which is $49.83. Therefore, the realized return is 16.78% ($8.37 / $49.83 x 100), rounded to two decimal places.
For more questions like Price click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/19091385
#SPJ11
You plan to retire in exactly 20 years. Your goal is to create a fund that will allow you to receive $20,000 at the end of each year for the 30 years between retirement and death (a psychic told you that you would die exactly 30 years after you retire). You know that you will be able to earn 11% per year during the 30-year retirement period.a. How large a fund will you need when you retire in 20 years to provide the 30-year, $20,000 retirement annuity?b. How much will you need today as a single amount to provide the fund calculated in part (a) if you earn only 9% per year during the 20 years preceding retirement?c. What effect would an increase in the rate you earn both during and prior to retirement have on the values found in parts (a) and (b)? Explain.d. Now assume that you will earn 10% from now through the end of your retirement. You want to make 20 end-of-year deposits into your retirement account that will fund the 30-year stream of $20,000 annual annuity payments. How large do your annual deposits have to be?
a. To provide the 30-year, $20,000 retirement annuity, the fund needed when you retire in 20 years is $1,454,422.31, rounded to two decimal places.
b. To provide the fund calculated in part (a), you will need $193,822.38 today as a single amount if you earn only 9% per year during the 20 years preceding retirement.
a. To calculate the fund needed when you retire in 20 years, we need to use the formula for present value of an annuity:
PV = (C / r) x (1 - (1 + r)^(-n))
where PV is the present value of the annuity, C is the annual payment, r is the interest rate per period, and n is the number of periods.
Using the given values, we have:
PV = (20,000 / 0.11) x (1 - (1 + 0.11)^(-30)) = $1,454,422.31
b. To calculate the amount needed today, we need to use the formula for present value of a lump sum:
PV = FV / (1 + r)^n
where PV is the present value, FV is the future value, r is the interest rate per period, and n is the number of periods.
Using the given values, we have:
PV = 1,454,422.31 / (1 + 0.09)^20 = $193,822.38
c. An increase in the interest rate would decrease the amount needed in both parts (a) and (b) because the present value of future cash flows decreases as the discount rate increases. Conversely, a decrease in the interest rate would increase the amount needed in both parts (a) and (b).
d. To calculate the annual deposits needed, we need to use the formula for present value of an annuity again, but this time we solve for the payment (P):
P = (r x PV) / ((1 + r)^n - 1)
where P is the payment, PV is the present value, r is the interest rate per period, and n is the number of periods.
Using the given values, we have:
PV = 1,454,422.31
r = 0.10
n = 20
P = (0.10 x 1,454,422.31) / ((1 + 0.10)^20 - 1) = $13,214.44
Therefore, the annual deposits needed are $13,214.44.
For more questions like Interest click the link below:
https://brainly.com/question/30393144
#SPJ11
The dimension of quality that is most difficult to achieve as complexity increases. A) suitability. B) quality. C) best buy. D) reliability
The dimension of quality that is most difficult to achieve as complexity increases is D) reliability. As a system becomes more complex, it can be challenging to maintain consistent performance and dependability.
The dimension of quality that is most difficult to achieve as complexity increases is not reliability, but rather Usability refers to the ease of use and user satisfaction with a product or service. As a system becomes more complex, it can be challenging to design it in a way that is easy and intuitive to use for the end-user. This is because complexity often leads to increased cognitive load, which can make it more difficult for users to understand how to interact with the system and achieve their goals.On the other hand, reliability refers to the consistency and dependability of a product or service over time. While it can also be challenging to achieve high levels of reliability as complexity increases, it is not necessarily the most difficult dimension of quality to achieve. With proper design, testing, and maintenance, it is possible to ensure that complex systems are reliable and perform consistently over time.
Learn more about dimension here:
https://brainly.com/question/28688567
#SPJ11
The dimension of quality that is most difficult to achieve as complexity increases is reliability. The Correct option is D
This is because as a product or service becomes more complex, there are more opportunities for failure points to occur. Reliability is the ability of a product or service to perform its intended function without failure over a certain period of time. As complexity increases, it becomes more difficult to ensure that every component of the product or service will work together seamlessly and without error.
This is particularly challenging when dealing with advanced technologies or intricate systems, where even small errors can have significant consequences. Therefore, ensuring reliability becomes increasingly important and difficult to achieve as complexity increases.
Learn more about dimension
https://brainly.com/question/30503937
#SPJ4
The Trinidad and Tobago dollar (written as TT$) and US dollar are quoted as US$1.0 = TT$10 by bank A, while at bank B the exchange rate between Canadian dollar and US dollar is quoted as US$0.8 = C$1.0. Suppose that at another bank, call it C, the exchange rate between C$ and TT$ is quoted as TT$7.5 = C$1.0.
Is there arbitrage opportunity? If so, assuming zero brokerage commissions, calculate arbitrage profit, with a transaction size of C$10 million. What are the market forces that will eliminate this arbitrage opportunity?
Yes, there is an arbitrage opportunity in this scenario. The first step to identify an arbitrage opportunity is to compare the exchange rates of different currencies at different banks.
Borrow C$10 million from Bank B at the exchange rate of US$0.8 = C$1.0, giving us US$8 million.
Convert the US$8 million to TT$ at Bank A's exchange rate of US$1.0 = TT$10, giving us TT$80 million.
Take the TT$80 million to Bank C and exchange it for C$, at the rate of TT$7.5 = C$1.0, giving us C$10.67 million.
Repay Bank B the C$10 million we borrowed, which now only costs us US$8 million due to the exchange rate, leaving us with a profit of C$0.67 million.
So, our arbitrage profit is C$0.67 million.
The market forces that will eliminate this arbitrage opportunity are the actions of other market participants who will also notice this opportunity and take advantage of it. As a result, they will buy TT$ and sell C$ until the exchange rates adjust to eliminate the discrepancy.
In this case, we can expect the demand for TT$ to increase and the demand for C$ to decrease, causing the exchange rate of TT$ to appreciate and the exchange rate of C$ to depreciate, until the three exchange rates become equalized.
To know more about arbitrage opportunity refer here:
https://brainly.com/question/16178885#
#SPJ11
private contracts between parties with mutual interests a. can solve some inefficiencies associated with positive externalities. b. will lead to market outcomes in which the public interest is sacrificed for personal gain. c. will create negative externalities. d. will reduce the well-being of society.
The private contracts between parties with mutual interests can solve some inefficiencies associated with positive externalities. Option A is correct.
Private contracts between parties with mutual interests can create incentives for those parties to internalize positive externalities and thus lead to efficient outcomes.
For example, a farmer might pay a beekeeper to place hives on their property in order to pollinate their crops, which would create a positive externality for the beekeeper. By entering into a private contract, the parties can capture the value of the positive externality and ensure that it is fully internalized. This can help to solve inefficiencies associated with positive externalities and lead to efficient outcomes.
Hence, A. is the correct option.
To know more about inefficiencies here
https://brainly.com/question/28232524
#SPJ4
Deposits of P are placed into a fund at the end of each year for 10 years. At an effective annual interest rate is 7%, the accumulated value of the series of payments at the end of the 10th year is 1084.31. Find P. a. 73.35 b. 78.48 c. 93.88 d. 88.61 e. 88.75
The answer is (b) 78.48.
How to calculate the value of an annuity deposit based on its accumulated value and the interest rate.?We can use the formula for the future value of an annuity to solve this problem:
FV =[tex]P * (\frac{(1 + r)^{n - 1}} { r})[/tex]
where:
FV is the future value of the annuityP is the annual paymentr is the effective annual interest raten is the number of paymentsIn this case, we know that:
FV = 1084.31
r = 7% = 0.07
n = 10
Substituting these values into the formula, we get:
1084.31 = P * [tex](\frac{(1 + 0.07)^{10 - 1)} }{ 0.07})[/tex]
Solving for P, we get:
P = 1084.31 * [tex](\frac{0.07 } {((1 + 0.07)^{10 - 1}})[/tex] ≈ 78.48
Therefore, the answer is (b) 78.48.
Learn more about value of an annuity.
brainly.com/question/13369387
#SPJ11
A labor saving device system save $2,000 per year for five (5) years. It can be installed at a cost of $8,000. The rate of return on this planned investment is most nearly a = 12 36% b.i =10.36% c.10% d. 9.36%
The rate of return on this planned investment is most nearly 7.44%. The correct answer is option e none of the above.
We can calculate the rate of return on this planned investment using the formula for the net present value (NPV) of an investment:
NPV = Present Value of Future Cash Flows - Initial Investment
If the NPV is positive, then the rate of return on the investment is greater than the required rate of return, and the investment is acceptable.
Here are the calculations for the given scenario:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows = Annual Savings x Present Value Annuity Factor
The Present Value Annuity Factor for a 5-year annuity at a discount rate of 10% is 3.791. Therefore:
Present Value of Future Cash Flows = $2,000 x 3.791 = $7,582
Initial Investment = $8,000
NPV = $7,582 - $8,000 = -$418
Since the NPV is negative, the rate of return on the investment is less than the required rate of return, and the investment is not acceptable. Therefore, none of the given answer choices is correct.
We can also calculate the rate of return using the internal rate of return (IRR) method. In this case, we would set the NPV equal to zero and solve for the rate that makes the NPV zero.
Using a financial calculator or spreadsheet software, we find that the IRR is approximately 7.44%. This is less than the required rate of return, which means that the investment is not acceptable.
The correct answer is option e none of the above.
To know more about rate of return refer to-
https://brainly.com/question/24232401
#SPJ11
Complete question
A labor saving device system save $2,000 per year for five (5) years. It can be installed at a cost of $8,000. The rate of return on this planned investment is most nearly
a = 12 36%
b.i =10.36%
c.10%
d. 9.36%
e. none of the above