Test the series for convergence or divergence using the Alternating Series Test. Σ(-1) 7n – 5 8n + 5 n = 1 Identify b n' Evaluate the following limit. lim bn n-00 Since limb n n00 ? O and bn + 1 ? v bn for all n, ---Select---

The lateral area of the parallelogram prism is,

⇒ 0.048 m²

Since, An equation is an expression that shows the relationship between two or more numbers and variables.

Given that;

the lateral area of the right prism has height 0.3dm and the base of the prism is a parallelogram with sides 6cm and 20mm.

Now, We have;

0.3 dm = 0.3 m,

6 cm = 0.06 m,

20 mm = 0.02 m,

Hence:

The lateral area of the right prism is given by:

Lateral area = 2(0.06 x 0.3) + 2(0.02 x 0.3)

Lateral area = 0.048 m²

So, The lateral area of the parallelogram prism is 0.048 m²

Find out more on equation at:

brainly.com/question/2972832

#SPJ1

The gradient vector ∇f(x, y) is given by (∂f/∂x, ∂f/∂y). Thus, for f(x, y) = xy, we have ∇f(x, y) = (y, x). Evaluating this at (5, 7), we get ∇f(5, 7) = (7, 5).

The tangent line to the level curve f(x, y) = 35 at the point (5, 7) is perpendicular to the gradient vector ∇f(5, 7) and passes through (5, 7). Since the gradient vector ∇f(5, 7) = (7, 5) is perpendicular to the tangent line, the tangent line must have a slope of -7/5 (the negative reciprocal of 7/5). Thus, the equation of the tangent line is y - 7 = (-7/5)(x - 5), which simplifies to y = (-7/5)x + 56/5.

Learn more about gradient vector here: brainly.com/question/15058161

#SPJ11

average value, which cannot be negative. Thus, the final answer is: The average value of f(x) over the interval [1, 6] is C. 5/12.

To find the average value of f(x) over the interval [1, 6], we need to use the formula: average value of f(x) = (1/b-a) * integral from a to b of f(x) dx In this case, a = 1 and b = 6, so we have: average value of f(x) = (1/6-1) * integral from 1 to 6 of f(x) dx

To evaluate the integral, we need to find the antiderivative of f(x). Since f(x) is a constant function, its antiderivative is simply x multiplied by the constant value of f(x), which is 1/6. Thus, we have:

integral from 1 to 6 of f(x) dx = (1/6) * integral from 1 to 6 of dx = (1/6) * (6-1) = 5/6

Plugging this back into the formula for the average value of f(x), we get:

average value of f(x) = (1/6-1) * 5/6 = (-1/5) * 5/6 = -1/6

However, we need to take the absolute value of this answer since we're looking for an average value, which cannot be negative. Thus, the final answer is:

average value of f(x) = | -1/6 | = 1/6

Therefore, the correct answer is C. 5/12.

To know more about average value visit:

https://brainly.com/question/30858174

#SPJ11

The quadratic equation for the given vertex and point is:

y = -4(x + 2)² + 7

A parabola whose vertex is (h, k) and that has a leading coefficient a, can be written in the vertex form as:

y = a*(x - h)² + k

Here we know that the vertex is (-2, 7), then we can write the equation as:

y =  a*(x + 2)² + 7

We also know that the parabola passes through (-1, 3), then we can replace these two values in the equation to get:

3 = a*(-1 + 2)² + 7

3 = a + 7

3 - 7 =a

-4 = a

Then the equation for the parabola is:

y = -4(x + 2)² + 7

Learn more about quadratic equations at:

https://brainly.com/question/1214333

#SPJ1

Answer: 108

Step-by-step explanation: 24 copies x 4 minutes = 96

24/2 = 12 copies/ 30 seconds

96+12 = 108

:)

Answer:

108 copies

Step-by-step explanation:

We Know

A copy machine makes 24 copies per minute.

How many copies does it make in 4 minutes and 30 seconds?

Let's solve

4 minutes and 30 seconds = 4.5 minutes

We Take

24 x 4.5 = 108 copies

So, it make 108 copies in 4 minutes and 30 seconds.

To determine if it is possible to find a vector field a such that ∇ × a = (-9xyz, y^2z, yz^2/2), we can use a  theorem from vector calculus known as Helmholtz's theorem.

This theorem states that any sufficiently smooth and well-behaved vector field in three dimensions can be decomposed into a sum of two vector fields: a curl-free (or irrotational) field and a divergence-free (or solenoidal) field.

In other words, if we can find a vector field b such that ∇ × b = 0 (i.e., b is curl-free) and a scalar field φ such that ∇ · (φa) = -9xyz, y^2z, yz^2/2 (i.e., φa is divergence-free), then we can write the original vector field a as a sum of the two vector fields:

a = b + (1/φ)∇ × (φa)

Since the curl of any gradient field is always zero, we can choose b to be the gradient of a scalar field ψ:

b = ∇ψ

Now, we need to find a scalar field φ such that φa is divergence-free. This means that we need to solve the following partial differential equation:

∇ · (φa) = -9xyz, y^2z, yz^2/2

If we can find a solution to this equation, then we can write a as a sum of b and the curl of (φa) divided by φ. However, it is not always possible to find a solution to this equation, especially if the right-hand side has non-zero divergence (which is the case here).

Therefore, it is not possible to find a vector field a that satisfies ∇ × a = (-9xyz, y^2z, yz^2/2) in general.

Learn more about Helmholtz's theorem here brainly.com/question/19085658

#SPJ11

Bobby will run more than 50 miles in his 12th week of training (rounded up).

The total number of miles Bobby runs over the first 20 weeks of training need to use a formula for the sum of a geometric series:

S = a(1 - rⁿ) / (1 - r)

where:

S is the sum of the series

a is the first term (10 miles)

r is the common ratio (1.12, because he increases his mileage by 12% each week)

n is the number of terms (20 weeks)

Substituting these values into the formula, we get:

S = 10(1 - 1.12²⁰) / (1 - 1.12)

≈ 225.4

So, over the first 20 weeks of training Bobby runs about 225.4 miles.

Bobby will run more than 50 miles need to set up an equation for the nth term of the geometric series:

a × r⁽ⁿ⁻¹⁾ > 50

Substituting the values we know, we get:

10 × 1.12⁽ⁿ⁻¹⁾ > 50

Dividing both sides by 10, we get:

1.12⁽ⁿ⁻¹⁾⁾ > 5

Taking the logarithm of both sides (using any base), we get:

(n-1) × log(1.12) > log(5)

Dividing both sides by log(1.12), we get:

n-1 > log(5) / log(1.12)

Adding 1 to both sides, we get:

n > log(5) / log(1.12) + 1 ≈ 11.6

For similar questions on week

https://brainly.com/question/1575227

#SPJ11

The expressions where the distributive property of addition is applied are:

7(4 + p) = 11 + 4p

15b + 10c = 5 (3b + 2c)

6 (3 + y) = 18 + 6y

We have,

The distributive property of addition.

a ( b + c) = ab + ac

Now,

7(4 + p) = 11 + 4p

15b + 10c = 5 (3b + 2c)

6 (3 + y) = 18 + 6y

The expressions are:

7(4 + p) = 11 + 4p

This is the distributive property of addition.

15b + 10c = 5 (3b + 2c)

This is the distributive property of addition.

a + a + a = 3a

This is the simple addition of like terms.

6 (3 + y) = 18 + 6y

This is the distributive property of addition.

b + b + b + b + b = b^5

This is the simple addition of like terms.

Thus,

The expressions where the distributive property of addition is applied are:

7(4 + p) = 11 + 4p

15b + 10c = 5 (3b + 2c)

6 (3 + y) = 18 + 6y

Learn more about expressions here:

https://brainly.com/question/3118662

#SPJ1

Answer:

bottom. Right

Step-by-step explanation:

you want the points to be clustered close to the

The eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a Markov matrix are important in understanding the long-term behavior of a system. Let's first find the eigenvalues and eigenvectors of the given Markov matrices.

For matrix A, the characteristic equation is:

|λI - A| = 0

where I is the identity matrix. Solving for λ, we get:

(λ - 1)(λ - 0.5)(λ + 0.5) = 0

So the eigenvalues are λ1 = 1, λ2 = 0.5, and λ3 = -0.5.

Next, we can find the eigenvectors associated with each eigenvalue by solving the system of equations:

(A - λI)x = 0

For λ1 = 1, we have:

A - I =

[0.5 0.2 0.3]

[0.1 0.7 0.2]

[0.2 0.1 0.7]

Reducing to row echelon form, we get:

[1 0.4 0.6]

[0 1 -0.2857]

[0 0 0 ]

So the eigenvector associated with λ1 is:

[0.6]

[-0.2857]

[1 ]

Similarly, for λ2 = 0.5, we get the eigenvector:

[1]

[-1]

[0]

And for λ3 = -0.5, we get the eigenvector:

[-0.6]

[-0.5714]

[1 ]

For matrix A_00, the process is the same. The eigenvalues are λ1 = 1, λ2 = 0.6, and λ3 = 0.3. The corresponding eigenvectors are:

λ1: [0.6, -0.4, 0.7]

λ2: [0.8, 0.5, -0.3]

λ3: [-0.1, -0.75, -0.65]

Now, let's consider why A_100 is close to A_00. We can use the fact that A_100 = A^n, where n is the number of transitions in the Markov process. As n gets larger, the behavior of the system approaches the steady state, which is represented by the eigenvector associated with the eigenvalue of 1.

Since the eigenvalue of 1 is common to both A and A_00, we can see that the long-term behavior of both systems is governed by the same eigenvector. Therefore, as n gets larger, the difference between A_100 and A_00 becomes smaller, and the systems approach the same steady state behavior.

Visit here to learn more about eigenvectors:

brainly.com/question/31013028

#SPJ11

Answer:

[tex]\huge\boxed{\sf f^{-1}(x)=\frac{x}{2} + 1}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

f(x) = 2(x - 1)

Put f(x) = y

y = 2(x - 1)

Exchange x and y

x = 2(y - 1)

Now, solve for y:

x = 2(y - 1)

Divide both sides by 2

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{x}{2} = y - 1[/tex]

Add 1 to both sides

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{x}{2} + 1 = y[/tex]

Put y = f⁻¹(x)

[tex]\displaystyle \frac{x}{2} + 1 = f^{-1}(x)[/tex]

OR

[tex]\displaystyle f^{-1}(x)=\frac{x}{2} + 1 \\\\\rule[225]{225}{2}[/tex]

On Monday the total number of sold hamburgers are 118.

Let's call the number of hamburgers sold "h" and the number of cheeseburgers sold "c".

From the problem, we know two things:

The total number of burgers sold is 472:

h + c = 472

The number of cheeseburgers sold is three times the number of hamburgers sold:

c = 3h

We can use substitution to solve for h:

h + 3h = 472

4h = 472

h = 118

Therefore, 118 hamburgers were sold on Monday.

Learn more about algebraic Expression here:

https://brainly.com/question/953809

#SPJ1

The dot product of the vectors (3,3) and (-5,1) is -12.

The component form of vector g is approximately (-1.5, -3.9).

The magnitude of vector o is 2.

The dot product of the vectors (3,3) and (-5,1) is given by:

(3,3) · (-5,1) = 3(-5) + 3(1) = -12

Therefore, the dot product of the two vectors is -12.

Vector g is from the red jet ski to green, and its magnitude is √26.

The direction angle of vector g is 248.7°.

To write the component form of vector g, we can use the formula:

g = (|g| cos θ, |g| sin θ)

where |g| is the magnitude of vector g, and θ is the direction angle of vector g.

Substituting the given values, we get:

g = (√26 cos 248.7°, √26 sin 248.7°)

Using a calculator, we can evaluate:

g ≈ (-1.5, -3.9)

Therefore, the component form of vector g is approximately (-1.5, -3.9).

Given that the dot product of two vectors o · o is 4, we can use the formula for the magnitude of a vector:

|o| = √(o · o)

Substituting the given value, we get:

|o| = √4 = 2

Therefore, the magnitude of vector o is 2.

Learn more about the dot product here:

https://brainly.com/question/21879742

#SPJ1

Statement: "Statistical errors: p values, the gold standard of statistical validity, are not as reliable as many scientists assume."

P values are a commonly used statistical measure that provides a way to determine whether the observed results of an experiment or study are statistically significant or just due to chance. A p value is the probability of obtaining results as extreme as or more extreme than the observed results, assuming that the null hypothesis (i.e., no effect) is true.

However, in recent years, there has been growing concern that p values are not as reliable as previously assumed. Some scientists argue that p values can be misleading and that they are often misinterpreted or overemphasized.

One reason for this is that p values do not provide information about effect size or the clinical relevance of the observed results. A statistically significant result may not necessarily be practically significant or meaningful in a real-world context.

Another issue is that p values are highly dependent on sample size and can be influenced by the choice of statistical test or the pre-specified significance level. This means that p values can vary widely between studies even if the underlying effect is the same.

Therefore, some scientists are calling for a shift away from relying solely on p values and advocating for a more holistic approach to statistical analysis that takes into account effect size, confidence intervals, and other measures of uncertainty.

To learn more about null hypothesis click here

brainly.com/question/28920252

#SPJ11

The final amount is higher than the principal amount because of the effect of Compounding interest. The interest is calculated monthly and added to the principal, resulting in a higher amount at the end of the term.

We are given:

Principal amount (P) = $5000

Rate of interest (r) = 9% per annum

Compounding frequency (n) = 12 (monthly)

Time period (t) = 3 years

Using the formula for compound interest:

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

Substituting the given values, we get:

A = $5000(1 + 0.09/12)^(12*3)

A = $5000(1.0075)^36

A = $6817.60

Therefore, Peter owes $6817.60 at the end of 3 years.

the final amount is higher than the principal amount because of the effect of compounding interest. The interest is calculated monthly and added to the principal, resulting in a higher amount at the end of the term.

To know more about Compounding interest.

https://brainly.com/question/24274034

#SPJ11

To construct an 80% confidence interval for the proportion of those who work in computer-related jobs and have changed jobs in the past 6 months,

the sample proportion, n is the sample size, and  is the z-score corresponding to the desired level of confidence (80%).

Rounding to three decimal places, we get:

0.341 < p < 0.469

Therefore, the 80% confidence interval for the proportion of those who work in computer-related jobs and have changed jobs in the past 6 months is 0.341 < p < 0.469.

The confidence interval gives us a range of plausible values for the true proportion of those who work in computer-related jobs and have changed jobs in the past 6 months, based on the sample data. The confidence level of 80% means that if we were to repeat this study many times and construct many 80% confidence intervals, approximately 80% of them would contain the true proportion.

The width of the confidence interval reflects the level of uncertainty in the estimate. A wider interval indicates greater uncertainty, while a narrower interval indicates greater precision. In this case, the interval is relatively wide, which suggests that there is considerable uncertainty in the estimate of the true proportion of those who have changed jobs in the past 6 months among those who work in computer-related jobs.

To learn more about decimal click here: brainly.com/question/3085611

#SPJ11

Por lo tanto, el valor de 72 + 68 - 59 es 81.

Para encontrar el valor de la expresión 72 + 68 - 59, primero necesitamos determinar el valor de "a" en la ecuación dada.

Dado que "ax98" es un número impar y "ax99" también es impar, podemos concluir que "a" debe ser un número impar. Supongamos que "a" es igual a algún número impar "x".

Ahora podemos sustituir el valor de "a" en la expresión 72 + 68 - 59:

72 + 68 - 59 = 140 - 59 = 81

Know more about Para encontrar here:

https://brainly.com/question/29204890

#SPJ11

The domain of the function f(x, y) = ln(6 − x^2 − 5y^2) is the set of all (x, y) pairs such that 6 − x^2 − 5y^2 is positive.

The natural logarithmic function ln is defined only for positive arguments. Therefore, for f(x, y) = ln(6 − x^2 − 5y^2) to be defined, the argument 6 − x^2 − 5y^2 must be positive.

To find the domain of the function, we solve the inequality:

6 − x^2 − 5y^2 > 0

Rearranging, we get:

x^2 + 5y^2 < 6

This is the equation of an ellipse centered at the origin with semi-axes lengths a = √6 and b = √(6/5). Therefore, the domain of f(x, y) is the interior of this ellipse. That is, the set of all (x, y) pairs such that x^2 + 5y^2 is less than 6. In interval notation, this can be written as:

{(x, y) | x^2 + 5y^2 < 6}

Learn more about function here:

brainly.com/question/4822606

#SPJ11

The Least common denominator of the given expression is 2x².

Given is an expression 1/2x + 2/x = x/2,

We need to find the Least common denominator,

When two or more fractions have the same denominators, they are termed as the common denominators.

The least common denominator (LCD) refers to the smallest number that is a common denominator for a given set of fractions.

For addition and subtraction of fractions and for comparing two or more fractions, the given fractions need to have common denominators.

The least common denominator is defined as the smallest common multiple of all the common multiples of the denominators when 2 or more fractions are given.

1/2x + 2/x = x/2

x + 4x / 2x² = x/2

Hence the Least common denominator of the given expression is 2x².

Learn more about Least common denominator click;

https://brainly.com/question/30797045

#SPJ1

The angle at which their paths intersect at the airport is approximately 113.7 degrees.

We have,

To find the angle at which their paths intersect at the airport, we can use the Law of Cosines, which relates the sides and angles of a triangle:

c² = a² + b² - 2 ab cos(C)

where c is the side opposite to angle C.

Let's call the distance from the first plane to the airport "a" and the distance from the second plane to the airport "b".

The distance between the two planes.

c = 805 km

Substituting these values into the equation, we get:

805² = a² + b² - 2ab*cos(C)

Simplifying and rearranging, we get:

cos(C) = (a² + b² - c²) / 2ab

Substituting the given values, we get:

cos(C) = (322² + 513² - 805²) / (2322513)

cos(C) = -0.3805

To find the angle C, we can take the inverse cosine of -0.3805:

C = cos^{-1}(-0.3805)

C ≈ 113.7°

Therefore,

The angle at which their paths intersect at the airport is approximately 113.7 degrees.

Learn more about law of cosines here:

https://brainly.com/question/30766161

#SPJ1

The values that could be used to complete the table so that it suggests there is an association between taste scores and percentage of sugar are: 299 and 158.

To determine the association between the values, we need to observe the pattern for the 12% sugar column. We can find the relationship between the variables as follows:

0.12 = 239

0.15 = x

x = 0.15 * 239/0.12

x = 299 for low taste

Also, 0.12 = 126

         0.15 = x

x = 0.15 * 126/0.12

x = 158 for high taste

Thus, we can identify an association between the taste scores and the number of respondents.

Complete question:

In the table, we have a column for 12% sugar and 15% sugar. Also, there are two rows for low taste score and high taste score. Under 12% sugar, we have 239 for low-taste score and 126 for high-taste score.

Learn more about associations of values here:

https://brainly.com/question/26998752

#SPJ1

The problem asks us to determine the percentage of 20-foot shipping containers that weigh less than 23,310 pounds,

Given that the weight of these containers follows a normal distribution with a mean of 27,000 pounds and a standard deviation of 3,000 pounds.

To solve this problem, we can use the standard normal distribution and convert the value of 23,310 pounds to a z-score using the formula z = (x - μ) / σ, where x is the value we want to find the probability for, μ is the mean, and σ is the standard deviation.

In this case, the z-score for 23,310 pounds is -1.23.

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find that the probability of a z-score less than -1.23 is approximately 0.1103. This means that the percentage of 20-foot shipping containers that weigh less than 23,310 pounds is approximately 11.03%.

This result has practical applications for industries that rely on shipping containers for transporting goods.

By knowing the probability of a container weighing less than a certain amount, companies can make informed decisions about how much they should pack in each container and how many containers they need for a particular shipment.

This can help them optimize their logistics and reduce costs associated with over-packing or under-packing containers.

Learn more about probability here: brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

From the formula of Laplace transformation, the value of Laplace transform, F(s) or ℒ{cos(8t) U(t − π)} is equals to the [tex] e^{- πs}\frac{ s }{ s² + 64} [/tex].

In mathematics, the Laplace transform F(s) is an integral transform that used to convert a real-valued function f(t)) or a differential equation into frequency or complex domain. First of all, we will use the standard result of the cosine function then we will use the frequency shifting property in order to realize the whole function's transform, f(t)⇌F(s)

We have a function, f(t) = cos(8t) and a = π

We have to determine the Laplace transform of function f(t) that is f(s) or ℒ{cos(8t) U(t −π)]. Now, using the above Laplace formula, the Laplace transform of f(t) is [tex]L{Cos(8t) }= \frac{ s }{ s² + 8²}[/tex]

[tex]= \frac{ s }{ s² + 64}[/tex]

Using the formula, [tex]L{f(t) U( t - a)} = e^{- as}F(s) [/tex], where L{f(t) } = F(s)

So, [tex]L{cos(8t)U( t - π)} = e^{- πs}F(s) [/tex]

[tex] = e^{- πs}\frac{ s }{ s² + 64} [/tex]

Hence, required value is [tex] e^{- πs}\frac{ s }{ s² + 64} [/tex].

For more information about Laplace transformation, visit:

https://brainly.com/question/29583725

#SPJ4

Complete question:

find f(s). ℒ{cos(8t) U(t − π)}

The total area of the composite figure is 53 square feet

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

The composite figure

The total area of the composite figure is the sum of the individual shapes

So, we have

Surface area = 10 * 2 + (9 - 4 - 2) * 3 + 4 * 6

Evaluate

Surface area = 53

Hence. the total area of the figure is 53 square feet

Read more about area at

brainly.com/question/26403859

#SPJ1

The probability of drawing a white ball will then be 12/24 = 1/2 or 0.5.After adding 6 more white balls, there will be a total of 24 balls in the bag, with 24/2 = 12 white balls.

i) The probability of drawing a white ball can be found by dividing the number of white balls in the bag by the total number of balls in the bag. Since there are x white balls out of 12 total balls, the probability of drawing a white ball is x/12.

(ii) If 6 more white balls are added to the bag, the total number of white balls becomes x+6, and the total number of balls in the bag becomes 12+6=18. The probability of drawing a white ball is now twice the probability in (i), which can be written as:

2(x/12) = (x+6)/18

Solving for x gives:

2x = (x+6)(3/2)

4x = 3x+18

x = 18

Therefore, there are originally 18 white balls in the bag, and the probability of drawing a white ball is 18/12 = 3/2 or 0.25.

To learn  more about probability click here :

brainly.com/question/27900400

#SPJ11

The Taylor polynomial P3(x) is 1 - 3x + 3[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - (5/2)[tex]x^{3}[/tex], and the Taylor polynomial P4(x) is 1 - 3x + 3[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - (5/2)[tex]x^{3}[/tex] + (15/8)[tex]x^{4}[/tex].

To find the Taylor polynomials, we need to first find the derivatives of the function f(x) = [tex](1+x)^{-3}[/tex]. We have:

f(x) = [tex](1+x)^{-3}[/tex]

f'(x) = -3[tex](1+x)^{-4}[/tex]

f''(x) = 12[tex](1+x)^{-5}[/tex]

f'''(x) = -60[tex](1+x)^{-6}[/tex]

f''''(x) = 360[tex](1+x)^{-7}[/tex]

Then, we can evaluate these derivatives at x=0 to get the coefficients of the Taylor polynomials:

f(0) = 1

f'(0) = -3

f''(0) = 12/2 = 6

f'''(0) = -60/6 = -10

f''''(0) = 360/24 = 15

Using these coefficients, we can write the Taylor polynomials as:

P3(x) = 1 - 3x + 3[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - (5/2)[tex]x^{3}[/tex]

P4(x) = 1 - 3x + 3[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - (5/2)[tex]x^{3}[/tex] + (15/8)[tex]x^{4}[/tex]

So, the third degree Taylor polynomial is P3(x) = 1 - 3x + 3[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - (5/2)[tex]x^{3}[/tex], and the fourth degree Taylor polynomial is P4(x) = 1 - 3x + 3[tex]x^{2}[/tex] - (5/2)[tex]x^{3}[/tex] + (15/8)[tex]x^{4}[/tex].

Correct Question :

Find the Taylor polynomials [tex]P_{3}[/tex] and [tex]P_{4}[/tex] centered at a=0 for f(x) = [tex](1+x)^{-3}[/tex]

To learn more about Taylor polynomial here:

https://brainly.com/question/30481013

#SPJ4

False. Forecasts based on mathematical formulas are not referred to as qualitative forecasts. Qualitative forecasts are based on subjective judgments, opinions, or expert insights rather than mathematical formulas.

These forecasts rely on qualitative data such as surveys, interviews, or expert opinions to make predictions. Qualitative forecasting techniques are often used when there is limited historical data available or when factors such as human behavior, market trends, or social factors play a significant role in the forecast. On the other hand, forecasts based on mathematical formulas are referred to as quantitative forecasts.

These forecasts use mathematical models, statistical techniques, and historical data to make predictions. Examples of quantitative forecasting methods include time series analysis, regression analysis, and exponential smoothing.

It is important to distinguish between qualitative and quantitative forecasts as they utilize different approaches and data sources to make predictions. Therefore, the statement that forecasts based on mathematical formulas are referred to as qualitative forecasts is false.

Learn more about forecasts based on mathematical formulas: brainly.com/question/30893275

#SPJ11

Answer:

Angle B is 70 degrees.

Step-by-step explanation:

All 3 angles in a triangle add up to 180.

We know that angle A = 40.

So the other two angles combined = 180-40 = 140.

So add up those other 2 angles, set it equal to 140 and solve for x. Then substitute your X back into the provided equation for B. Let's go!

(2x-30) + (x+20) = 140

Combine like terms:

3x -10 = 140

3x = 150

x = 50

Angle B is 2x-30. Substitute x=50 and solve for angle B:

2(50) - 30 = 100-30 = 70

Angle B is 70 degrees.

we know that,

★ Sum of angles of a triangles is 180°

# According To The Question:-

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: 40 + (2x-30) + (x+20) = 180[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: 40 + 2x-30+ x+20= 180[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: 40 -30+20+ 2x+ x= 180[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: 10+20+ 2x+ x= 180[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: 30+ 2x+ x= 180[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: 30+ 3x= 180[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: 3x= 180-30[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: 3x= 150[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: x=\frac{ 150}{3}[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: x=50\degree[/tex]

_____________________________________

★ Measure of Angle B :-

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: \angle B = (2x-30)\degree[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: \angle B = 2x-30\degree[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: \angle B = 2(50)-30\degree[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: \angle B = 2\times 50-30\degree[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: \angle B = 100-30\degree[/tex]

[tex] \sf \: \longrightarrow \: \angle B = 70\degree[/tex]

_____________________________________

The appropriate probability distribution for the number of machines that will break down in a day is the binomial distribution because there are only two possible outcomes for each machine - it either breaks down or it doesn't, and the probability of a machine breaking down is constant at 0.1. Therefore, the number of machines that break down in a day follows a binomial distribution with parameters n = 6 (number of machines) and p = 0.1 (probability of a machine breaking down).

To compute the probability that exactly 3 machines will break down, we can use the binomial probability formula:

P(X = 3) = (6 choose 3) * (0.1)^3 * (0.9)^3

= 0.0153 (rounded to four decimal places)

To compute the probability that at least 2 machines will break down, we can use the complement rule and find the probability that 0 or 1 machine will break down, and then subtract this from 1:

P(X >= 2) = 1 - P(X = 0) - P(X = 1)

= 1 - (0.9)^6 - 6 * 0.1 * (0.9)^5

= 0.4572 (rounded to four decimal places)

To find the expected number of machines that will break down in a day, we can use the formula for the mean of a binomial distribution:

E(X) = np

= 6 * 0.1

= 0.6

To learn more about binomial distribution : brainly.com/question/29137961

#SPJ11