The CEO of a large manufacturing company is curious if there is a difference in productivity level of her warehouse employees based on the region of the country the warehouse is located. She randomly selects 35 employees who work in warehouses on the East Coast (Group 1) and 35 employees who work in warehouses in the Midwest (Group 2) and records the number of parts shipped out from each for a week. She finds that East Coast group ships an average of 1287 parts and knows the population standard deviation to be 348. The Midwest group ships an average of 1449 parts and knows the population standard deviation to be 298. Using a 0.01 level of significance, test if there is a difference in productivity level. What are the correct hypotheses for this problem

Answer:

the first one

Step-by-step explanation:

i assume they want to know how many cookies are in each box so you take the total number of cookies and divide by the number of boxes which is four so t/4 = b since they don't give you an amount of cookies

Answer:

t/4 = b aka the first one

Step-by-step explanation:

t/4 is the same as b

The time it takes them to make 1300 soccer kicks together is 51 minutes

Writing this as a coordinate (x, y). If Kendra can make 120 soccer kicks in 3 minutes and Jovani can make 100 soccer kicks in 4 minutes, this can be written in a coordinate form as (3, 120) and (4, 100)

The standard linear equation is given as y = mx + b

Get the slope:

m = 100-120/4-3

m = -20/1

m = -20

Get the y-intercept:

Recall that y = mx + b

120 = -20(3) + b

120 = -60 + b

b = 180

The required equation is g(x) = -20x + 180

To determine the time it will take them to make 1300 soccer kicks together, substitute g(x) = 1300 and find "x"

1300 = -20x + 180

20x = 1200 - 180

20x = 1020

x = 51 minutes

Hence the time it takes them to make 1300 soccer kicks together is 51 minutes

Learn more on equations here: https://brainly.com/question/11408596

Answer:

D. [tex]tan(30^\circ+45^\circ)[/tex] is the correct answer.

Step-by-step explanation:

The given situation can be represented as a figure attached in answer area.

B is the base of tree.

C is the base of wires.

A and D are the end of 2 wires supporting the tree.

[tex]\angle DCB =45^\circ\\\angle ACB =75^\circ\\[/tex]

Here, we need to find the Height of the tree which is represented the by side AB.

and we are given that bases of wires and tree base are at a distance 4 ft.

i.e. side BC = 4 ft

If we look at the [tex]\triangle ABC[/tex], we are given the base BC and the [tex]\angle ACB[/tex], and the perpendicular is to be find out.

We can use trigonometric identity:

[tex]tan\theta =\dfrac{Perpendicular}{Base}[/tex]

[tex]tan 75^\circ = \dfrac{AB}{BC}\\\bold {tan (45+30)^\circ }= \dfrac{AB}{4}\\\Rightarrow AB = \bold {tan (45+30)^\circ } \times 4 = 14.93\ ft[/tex]

Hence, D. [tex]tan(30^\circ+45^\circ)[/tex] is the correct answer.

Answer:

D

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x=20

Step-by-step explanation:

11/10=121/5x+10

11(5x+10)=1210

5x+10=110

5x=100

x=20

Answer:

x= 20

Step-by-step explanation:

We can use ratios to solve

11                 10

---------- = ---------------

11+121          10 + 5x+10

Simplify

11                 10

---------- = ---------------

132          5x+20

Using cross products

11 * (5x+20) = 10 *132

Divide each side by 11

11/11 * (5x+20) = 10 *132/11

5x+20 = 10*12

5x+20 = 120

Subtract 20 from each side

5x = 100

Divide by 5

5x/5 =100/5

x = 20

Answer:

0.5kg

2kg

0.7kg

b668_*;

fxjiezncy

gcjoxfj

vxfhb

Answer:

B) f(x) = -3/5x +5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

all you have to do is substitute for x = -6,-3,0,&3 in either of the equations to see if it gives -1,4,9,&14 respectively

Answer:

b

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

[tex]6 \text{ unit}^3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]\text{Volume}=\text{Base * Height * Depth}\\1*2*3=6\\\text{So neither of your options are correct.}[/tex]

━━━━━━━☆☆━━━━━━━

▹ Answer

6ft³

▹ Step-by-Step Explanation

Since we are using the measurement of cubic feet, the answer is always going to be (cf³) .

1 × 2 × 3 = 6

Cubic feet - 6 ft³

Hope this helps!

- CloutAnswers ❁

Brainliest is greatly appreciated!

━━━━━━━☆☆━━━━━━━

Answer:

C ( 11 , -11 )

Step-by-step explanation:

Solution:-

We are given two points in the cartesian coordinate system as:

                   A ( 3 , -5 )              B ( 13 , -15 )

The point C lies on the line segment from A to B. The ratio of segment given is:

                              AC / AB = 4 / 5

To solve such type of problems. We will use vector equation of line AC.

To form a vector equation of line representing AB. We will first determine the direction vector ( d ) that is parallel to the line AB as follows:

                 d = OB - OA

                 d = < 13 , -15 > - < 3 , -5 >  

                 d = < 10 , -10 >

The fixed point on the line is taken. We will take point A. The vector equation of line from point A to point B is expressed as:

                < x , y > = OA + s*d

                < x , y > = < 3, -5 > + s* < 10 , -10 >  

The above equation satisfies all the points that lies on the line AB. To determine the coordinates of ( C ). We will plug in the appropriate value of parameter ( s ) and evaluate.

So point C is 4/5 th the magnitude of the distance AB from A. Hence, s = 4/5 as follows:

               < x , y > = < 3 , -5 > + ( 4/5 ) * < 10 , -10 >  

               < x , y > = < 3 , -5 > + < 8 , -8 >  

              < x , y > = < 11 , -11 >   ... Answer

Answer:

a. P-value = 0.039.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean significantly differs from 100.

b. P-value = 0.013.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean significantly differs from 100.

c. P-value = 0.130.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean significantly differs from 100.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the population mean significantly differs from 100.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=100\\\\H_a:\mu\neq 100[/tex]

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=65.

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

[tex]df=n-1=65-1=64[/tex]

a. The sample mean is M=103.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=11.5.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{11.5}{\sqrt{65}}=1.4264[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{103-100}{1.4264}=\dfrac{3}{1.4264}=2.103[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, with 64 degrees of freedom and t=2.103, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(t>2.103)=0.039[/tex]

As the P-value (0.039) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean significantly differs from 100.

b. The sample mean is M=96.5.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=11.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{11}{\sqrt{65}}=1.3644[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{96.5-100}{1.3644}=\dfrac{-3.5}{1.3644}=-2.565[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, with 64 degrees of freedom and t=-2.565, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(t<-2.565)=0.013[/tex]

As the P-value (0.013) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean significantly differs from 100.

c. The sample mean is M=102.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=10.5.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{10.5}{\sqrt{65}}=1.3024[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{102-100}{1.3024}=\dfrac{2}{1.3024}=1.536[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, with 64 degrees of freedom and t=1.536, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(t>1.536)=0.130[/tex]

As the P-value (0.13) is bigger than the significance level (0.05), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is not enough evidence to support the claim that the population mean significantly differs from 100.

Answer:

A : [tex]5^{\frac{5}{6} }[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Because you're multiplying two numbers with the same base, you can add their exponents:

[tex]\sqrt{5} = 5^{\frac{1}{2} } = 5^{\frac{3}{6} } \\\sqrt[3]{5} =5^{\frac{1}{3} } = 5^{\frac{2}{6} }[/tex]

[tex]5^{\frac{3}{6} } * 5^{\frac{2}{6} } = 5^{\frac{5}{6} }[/tex]

Answer:

B.66

Step-by-step explanation:

Perimeter =2(base+side)

2 x (13+20) = 66

Answer:

B)

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

a) [tex]\hat p=\frac{148}{4167}=0.036[/tex]

b) [tex]0.0355 - 1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.036(1-0.036)}{4167}}=0.030[/tex]

[tex]0.0355 + 1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.036(1-0.036)}{4167}}=0.041[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The sample proportion have the following distribution

[tex]\hat p \sim N(p,\sqrt{\frac{p(1-p)}{n}})[/tex]

Part a

The estimated proportion for this case can be calculated like this:

[tex]\hat p=\frac{148}{4167}=0.036[/tex]

Part b

In order to find the critical value we need to take in count that we are finding the interval for a proportion, so on this case we need to use the z distribution. Since our interval is at 95% of confidence, our significance level would be given by [tex]\alpha=1-0.95=0.05[/tex] and [tex]\alpha/2 =0.025[/tex]. And the critical value would be given by:

[tex]z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96, z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96[/tex]

The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:  

[tex]\hat p \pm z_{\alpha/2}\sqrt{\frac{\hat p (1-\hat p)}{n}}[/tex]

Replacing we got:

[tex]0.0355 - 1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.036(1-0.036)}{4167}}=0.030[/tex]

[tex]0.0355 + 1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.036(1-0.036)}{4167}}=0.041[/tex]

According to the data given:

In a sample with a number n of people surveyed with a probability of a success of [tex]\pi[/tex], and a confidence level of [tex]\alpha[/tex], we have the following confidence interval of proportions.

[tex]\pi \pm z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}[/tex]

In which

z is the z-score that has a p-value of [tex]\frac{1+\alpha}{2}[/tex].

Out of 4167 patients treated with the​ drug, 148 developed the adverse reaction of nausea, hence:

[tex]n = 4167, \pi = \frac{148}{4167} = 0.036[/tex]

The best point estimate of the population proportion p is 0.036.

95% confidence level

So [tex]\alpha = 0.95[/tex], z is the value of Z that has a p-value of [tex]\frac{1+0.95}{2} = 0.975[/tex], so [tex]z = 1.96[/tex].  

The lower limit of this interval is:

[tex]\pi - z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}} = 0.036 - 1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.036(0.964)}{4167}} = 0.03[/tex]

The upper limit of this interval is:

[tex]\pi + z\sqrt{\frac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}} = 0.036 + 1.96\sqrt{\frac{0.036(0.964)}{4167}} = 0.042[/tex]

The 95​% confidence interval for the proportion of adverse reactions is (0.03, 0.042).

A similar problem is given at https://brainly.com/question/16807970

Answer:

The null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1=\pi_2\\\\H_a:\pi_1\neq \pi_2[/tex]

Test statistic z = -0.29

P-value = 0.7709

Fail to reject H0. The data does not suggest that the front cover and nature of the first question on mail surveys influence the response rate.

Step-by-step explanation:

This is a hypothesis test for the difference between proportions.

The claim is that the return rate is different for the Plain cover and the Skydiver cover.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \pi_1-\pi_2=0\\\\H_a:\pi_1-\pi_2\neq 0[/tex]

The significance level is 0.1.

The sample 1 (plain cover), of size n1=209 has a proportion of p1=0.493.

[tex]p_1=X_1/n_1=103/209=0.493[/tex]

The sample 2 (skydiver cover), of size n2=215 has a proportion of p2=0.507.

[tex]p_2=X_2/n_2=109/215=0.507[/tex]

The difference between proportions is (p1-p2)=-0.014.

[tex]p_d=p_1-p_2=0.493-0.507=-0.014[/tex]

The pooled proportion, needed to calculate the standard error, is:

[tex]p=\dfrac{X_1+X_2}{n_1+n_2}=\dfrac{103+109}{209+215}=\dfrac{212}{424}=0.5[/tex]

The estimated standard error of the difference between means is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_1}+\dfrac{p(1-p)}{n_2}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.5*0.5}{209}+\dfrac{0.5*0.5}{215}}\\\\\\s_{p1-p2}=\sqrt{0.001196+0.001163}=\sqrt{0.002359}=0.049[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p_d-(\pi_1-\pi_2)}{s_{p1-p2}}=\dfrac{-0.014-0}{0.049}=\dfrac{-0.014}{0.049}=-0.29[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a z-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(z<-0.29)=0.7709[/tex]

As the P-value (0.771) is bigger than the significance level (0.1), the effect is not significant.

The null hypothesis failed to be rejected.

There is not enough evidence to support the claim that the return rate is different for the Plain cover and the Skydiver cover.

Answer:

the answer to this question is The last option: 2g^2+5g+4

Step-by-step explanation:

Every other option can be factored besides the last one with rational numbers.

Answer: It’s C

Step-by-step explanation:

On edge

Answer:

Yes. There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of Americans feel the United States could develop a way to protect itself from atomic bombs in 1945 is significantly greater than 0.5.

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete:

In October 1945, the Gallup organization asked 1487 randomly sampled Americans, "Do you think we can develop a way to protect ourselves from atomic bombs in case other countries tried to use them against us?" with 788 responding yes. Did a majority of Americans feel the United States could develop a way to protect itself from atomic bombs in 1945? Use the α=0.05 level of significance.

This is a hypothesis test for a proportion.

The claim is that the proportion of Americans feel the United States could develop a way to protect itself from atomic bombs in 1945 is significantly greater than 0.5.

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

H_0: \pi=0.5\\\\H_a:\pi>0.5

The significance level is 0.05.

The sample has a size n=1487.

The sample proportion is p=0.53.

[tex]p=X/n=788/1487=0.53[/tex]

The standard error of the proportion is:

[tex]\sigma_p=\sqrt{\dfrac{\pi(1-\pi)}{n}}=\sqrt{\dfrac{0.5*0.5}{1487}}\\\\\\ \sigma_p=\sqrt{0.000168}=0.013[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the z-statistic as:

[tex]z=\dfrac{p-\pi-0.5/n}{\sigma_p}=\dfrac{0.53-0.5-0.5/1487}{0.013}=\dfrac{0.03}{0.013}=2.288[/tex]

This test is a right-tailed test, so the P-value for this test is calculated as:

[tex]\text{P-value}=P(z>2.288)=0.011[/tex]

As the P-value (0.011) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is  significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

There is enough evidence to support the claim that the proportion of Americans feel the United States could develop a way to protect itself from atomic bombs in 1945 is significantly greater than 0.5.

Answer:

-11

Step-by-step explanation:

Our function is 2x-13x+5

Answer:<5 and <4 are exterior angles

Step-by-step explanation:

Because they are the only ones outside it they are the only ones that are exterior angles!

<!> Brainliest is appreciated! <!>

Answer:

for AL Its 3 and 4

Answer:

1/6

1/14

5/64

3/8

Step-by-step explanation:

Easiest and fastest way to evaluate these is to plug it into a calc.

Answer:

x > 9

Step-by-step explanation:

Simply divide both sides by 4:

4x/4 > 36/4

x > 36/4

x > 9

━━━━━━━☆☆━━━━━━━

▹ Answer

x > 9

▹ Step-by-Step Explanation

4x > 36

---     --- → x > 9

4       4

Hope this helps!

- CloutAnswers ❁

Brainliest is greatly appreciated!

━━━━━━━☆☆━━━━━━━

Answer:

y = 1 and x = 1

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given the equation  y=−5x+6    and    y=3x-2

because both of these equations have y on one side we can substitute the equation as

-5x+6 = 3x-2

(subtract 3x)

-8x+6 = -2

(subtract 6)

-8x = -8

(divide by -8)

x=1

Then all we need to do is put x into the equation

y=-5(1) +6

y = -5+6

y = 1

Answer:

Third graph from the top

Step-by-step explanation:

A proportional relationship is a straight line that goes through the point (0,0)

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The third straight graph, since a proportion is a relationship in which a second variable is changed by a same value all the time (linear).

Hope this helps, if not, tell me and I shall try again

Answer:12.4

Step-by-step explanation:

hyp=16,opp=x

sin 51°=[tex]\frac{x}{16}[/tex]

cross multipy

sin 51° x 16 = x

x=0.7771 x 16

x≅12.4

Answer:

w=7

Step-by-step explanation:

1. -8+5w=27

2. add 8 to both sides: 8+-8+5w=27+8

3. Simplify: 5w=35

4. Divide both sides by 5: 5w/5=35/5

5. w=7

Hope This Helps :)

Answer:

w = 7

Step-by-step explanation:

-8 + 5w = 27

Add 8 on both sides.

-8 + 5w + 8 = 27 + 8

5w = 35

Divide both sides by 5.

5w/5 = 35/5

w = 7

Answer:

The margin of error of this confidence interval is MOE=0.085.

Step-by-step explanation:

The confidence interval bounds are usually calculated from a sample statistic substracting (for the lower bound) or adding (for the upper bound) the margin of error. This margin of error depends on the confidence level, the standard deviation and the sample size.

Then, if the lower and upper bound are calculated this way, we can calculate the margin of error as:

[tex]LB=p-MOE\\\\UB=p+MOE\\\\UB-LB=(p+MOE)-(p-MOE)=2\cdot MOE\\\\\\MOE=\dfrac{UB-LB}{2}=\dfrac{0.26-0.09}{2}=\dfrac{0.17}{2}=0.085[/tex]

Answer:

what is your problem

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

94 cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula for finding the circumference of a circle is;

Circumference = 2πr

where π = [tex]\frac{22}{7}[/tex] or 3.14 and

r = radius

Here radius is 15 cm so;

Circumference = [tex]2 * \frac{22}{7} * 15[/tex]

                         = [tex]\frac{660}{7}[/tex]cm

                         = 94.28cm

                         = 94 cm (  rounded to the nearest centimetre )

Answer:

The answer is A on edge 2020

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: A

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

- 5i.

Step-by-step explanation:

( 1 + 2 i ) ( − 2 − 1 i )

= 1 * -2 + 1*-1i + 2i*-2 - 2i*1i

= -2 - i - 4i - 2i^2           i^2 = -1 so we have:

-2 - 5i +2

= 0 - 5i

= -5i.