What is the solution to 8/x+2=2/x-4

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

6.10%

Step-by-step explanation:

For every round since we are choosing with equal probability, then the probability of choosing from either of the bags is 1/2

Here, this scenario is only possible when a particular bag has been chosen 10 times and the other bag has been chosen 6 times ( meaning a particular bag has been emptied and for a particular bag to be emptied, all of its content would have been picked)

Now on the 17th trial, an empty bag is chosen

Therefore the required probability will be;

16C0 * (1/2)^10 * (1/2)^6 * 1/2 = 0.0610 = 6.1%

Answer:

x=9

Step-by-step explanation:

3x subtracted by 2y

is 1 then 1 multiplied by 2 is 2 then 7 + 2 is 9

PEMDAS

Answer:

GCF - 4

Step-by-step explanation:

36 - 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 9, 12, 18, 36

44 - 1, 2, 4, 11, 44

Hope this helps! :)

Answer:

The lines will intersect infinitely many times, because they are identical.

Step-by-step explanation:

Let's change the equations of the lines into (y=mx+b) form.

6x-4y=2 Divide by 2.

3x-2y=1 Move x and divide by -2.

-2y=1-3x ---> y= -1/2+3/2x

The equation of the first line is y=3/2x- 1/2

-2y+3x=1

-2y=1-3x

y = 3/2x -1/2

The equation of the second line is y = 3/2x- 1/2.

The lines are identical- infinitely many intersections.

Step-by-step explanation:

I think the answer is third because it doesn't has a solution.

Answer:

The correct option is (A)

A. Replace row 4 by its sum with - 4 times row 3.

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}1&-4&4&0&-2\\0&2&-6&0&5\\0&0&1&2&-4\\0&0&0&-3&15\end{array}\right][/tex]

w = 8

x = 17/2

y = 6

z = -5

Step-by-step explanation:

The given matrix is

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}1&-4&4&0&-2\\0&2&-6&0&5\\0&0&1&2&-4\\0&0&4&5&-1\end{array}\right][/tex]

To solve this matrix we need to create a zero at the 4th row and 3rd column which is 4 at the moment.

Multiply 3rd row by -4 and add it to the 4th row.

Mathematically,

[tex]R_4 = R_4 - 4R_3[/tex]

So the correct option is (A)

A. Replace row 4 by its sum with - 4 times row 3.

So the matrix becomes,

[tex]\left[\begin{array}{ccccc}1&-4&4&0&-2\\0&2&-6&0&5\\0&0&1&2&-4\\0&0&0&-3&15\end{array}\right][/tex]

Now the matrix may be solved by back substitution method.

Bonus:

The solution is given by

Eq. 1

-3z = 15

z = -15/3

z = -5

Eq. 2

y + 2z = -4

y + 2(-5) = -4

y - 10 = -4

y = -4 + 10

y = 6

Eq. 3

2x - 6y + 0z = 5

2x - 6(6) = 5

2x - 12 = 5

2x = 12 + 5

2x = 17

x = 17/2

Eq. 4

w - 4x + 4y + 0z = -2

w - 4(17/2) + 4(6) = -2

w - 34 + 24 = -2

w - 10 = -2

w = -2 + 10

w = 8

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

undefined slope means tat the denominator=0 in the equation

m=y2-y1/x2-x1

A: m=-1-1/1+1=-2

B;2-2/2+2=0

C: 3+3/-3+3 = 6/0 undefined

D: 4+4/4+4=1

Answer:

As per the properties of parallel lines and interior alternate angles postulate, we can prove that:

[tex]m\angle 5+m\angle 2+m\angle 6=180^\circ[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

Line y || z

i.e. y is parallel to z.

To Prove:

[tex]m\angle 5+m\angle 2+m\angle 6=180^\circ[/tex]

Solution:

It is given that the lines y and z are parallel to each other.

[tex]m\angle 5, m\angle 1[/tex] are interior alternate angles because lines y and z are parallel and one line AC cuts them.

So, [tex]m\angle 5= m\angle 1[/tex] ..... (1)

Similarly,

[tex]m\angle 6, m\angle 3[/tex] are interior alternate angles because lines y and z are parallel and one line AB cuts them.

So, [tex]m\angle 6= m\angle 3[/tex] ...... (2)

Now, we know that the line y is a straight line and A is one point on it.

Sum of all the angles on one side of a line on a point is always equal to [tex]180^\circ[/tex].

i.e.

[tex]m\angle 1+m\angle 2+m\angle 3=180^\circ[/tex]

Using equations (1) and (2):

We can see that:

[tex]m\angle 5+m\angle 2+m\angle 6=180^\circ[/tex]

Hence proved.

Answer: yes

Step-by-step explanation: yes

Answer:Yes indeed!

Step-by-step explanation:

Your right!

Answer:  Sheila today = [tex]46\dfrac{1}{3}[/tex]  yrs old

Step-by-step explanation:

   J + S = 115 v⇒  J = 115 - S

Current Ages                        Ages 14 years ago

 Joe (J) = 115 - S                      J - 14 = 2(S - 14)

 Sheila (S) = S

Substitute J = 115 - S into the "14 years ago" equation

      J    - 14 = 2(S - 14)

(115 - S) - 14 = 2(S - 14)

111 -S = 2S - 28

111 = 3S  - 28

139 = 3S

46 [tex]\frac{1}{3}[/tex] = S

It is odd that the result was not an integer.  I wonder if you meant to type "Joe was twice as old as Sheila is today.  That would change the equation to:

J - 14 = 2S

111 - S = 2S

111 = 3S

37 = S

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

We would set up the hypothesis test. This is a test of a single population mean since we are dealing with mean

For the null hypothesis,

H0: µ = 7.2

For the alternative hypothesis,

H1: µ ≠ 7.2

This is a two tailed test.

Since the population standard deviation is given, the test statistic would be the z score determined from the normal distribution table. The formula is

z = (x - µ)/(σ/√n)

Where

x = sample mean

µ = population mean

σ = population standard deviation

n = number of samples

From the information given,

µ = 7.2

x = 7.3

σ = 0.8

n = 250

z = (7.3 - 7.2)/(0.8/√250) = 1.976

Test statistic is 1.976

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given:

  281,000 homes sold through Jan 2011 was 66.3% of homes completed

  378,000 homes was a 28.5% decrease from starts in 2010

Find:

  (i) Homes completed in 12 months through Jan 2011

  (ii) Comparison to homes started in 2010

Solution:

(i) Using the given relation, we can find homes completed through Jan 2011.

  281,000 = 0.663×completed

  completed = 281,000/0.663 = 423,831

__

(ii) Similarly, we can find the number of 2010 starts:

  starts(1 -28.5%) = 378,000

  starts = 378,000/0.715 = 528,671

The relation of completions in 2011 to starts in 2010 is ...

  423,831 -528,671 = -104,840

__

Through Jan 2011, there were 423,831 homes completed, which was 104,840 fewer than the number of starts in 2010.

_____

Comment on your question

Your problem statement supplies the answer to the first question in 2(c). Part 1(b) tells you the relation between starts in 2011 and in 2010, so you can easily figure starts in 2010 from your answer to that question.

Answer:

Yes, the function satisfies the hypothesis of the Mean Value Theorem on the interval [1,5]

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a function

[tex]f(x)=ln(x)[/tex]

Interval [1,5]

The given function is defined on this interval.

Hypothesis of Mean Value Theorem:

(1) Function is continuous on interval [a,b]

(2)Function is defined on interval (a,b)

From the graph we can see that

The function is continuous on [1,5] and differentiable at(1,5).

Hence, the function satisfies the hypothesis of the Mean Value Theorem.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Given the equation, 2x- y = 5, if x = 3, to get y we will simply substitute the value of x into the expression given as shown;

[tex]2x - y = 5\\\\Substituting \ x = 3\ into \ the \ equation\\\\2(3) - y = 5\\\\6 - y = 5\\\\subtracting\ 6\ from\ both\ sides\\\\6-6-y = 5- 6\\\\-y = -1\\\\multiplying\ both\ sides\ by \ -1\\-(-y) = -(-1)\\\\y = 1[/tex]

Hence, the value of y is 1

Answer:

[tex]-x+| \: y\: |[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

[tex]-x+|-y|[/tex]

[tex]\mathrm{Apply\:absolute\:rule}: \left|-y\right|\:=| \: y\: |[/tex]

[tex]-x+| \: y\: |[/tex]

Answer:

-9

Step-by-step explanation:

1 - 5 (3 + 2 - 3)

1  −  5  ( 5  −  3 )

1 - 5 x 3

1 - 10

-9

Answer:

a) -8x^3 + x^2 + 6x

b)16x^2 -9

c) 24x^4 + 37x^3 +13x^2 -18x

Step-by-step explanation:

a) distribute -2x to x and 4x^2 then do the same for the other part and then add the ones w the same exponent.

b) do foil ( multiply first outside inside last) which will be 4x times 4x then 4x times 3 then -3 times 4x and 3 times -3. add like exponents

c) do the same as above

Answer: 6x^2

Step-by-step explanation:

The area of a triangle is 1/2bh

Thus, simply multiply 2x*3x = 6x^2

Hope it helps <3

Answer:

Solution,

Base(b)= 3x

Height(h) = 2x

Now,

Finding the area of triangle:

[tex] \frac{1}{2} \times b \times h[/tex]

[tex] \frac{1}{2} \times 3x \times 2x[/tex]

[tex] \frac{1}{2} \times 6 {x}^{2} [/tex]

[tex]3 {x}^{2} [/tex]

Hope this helps....

Good luck on your assignment....

Answer:

GOOGLE :)

equation:

y=mx+b

m= slope (how steep the line is(negative is \ positive is /))

b= y intercept (where it is on the vertical line(up and down line))

step by step

1. locate y intercept and plotthe point

2.from that point use slop to find second point and plot

Answer:

4.428 hours

Step-by-step explanation:

If the learning rate is 0.81, the slope of the learning curve is:

[tex]b=\frac{ln(0.81)}{ln(2)} \\b=-0.304[/tex]

The time it takes to produce the n-th unit is:

[tex]T_n=T_1*n^b[/tex]

If T1 = 8 hours, the time required to produce the seventh unit will be:

[tex]T_n=8*7^{-0.304}\\T_n=4.428\ hours[/tex]

It will take roughly 4.428 hours.

Answer:

B. zero

Step-by-step explanation:

If the temperature is supposed to remain constant over time (the same) when working properly, then this means that there is no increase or decrease over time.

If there were a line to represent this, then it would be a straight line with a slope of 0 because the temperature would remain the same.

Answer:

17+m=34

Step-by-step explanation:

Nina had 17 marbles in a bag + the x amount of marbles that her mom gives her.

so 17+x=34

(x is the variable that I chose however it could be any variable, so it would also mean the same thing as 17+m=34)

Hope this helped!

Answer:

17 + m = 34.

Step-by-step explanation:

Nina had 17 marbles;

Mother put a handful of marbles, let's say m.

Now Nina has 34 marbles.

34 marbles is [=] 17 marbles Nina had before + m from her mother.

17 + m = 34 will be the right equation.

Answer:

The answer is 60cm^2.

hope it helps..

Answer: The equations are

w + s = 4500

2.25s = 4500

Step-by-step explanation:

Let w represent the number of bottles of water that the football manager bought.

Let s represent the number of bottles of soda that the football manager bought.

The manager needs to buy a total of 4,500 drinks. This means that

w + s = 4500

He also needs to have 25% more water than soda.

25% of soda = 25/100 × s = 0.25s

25% more of water than soda = s + 0.25s = 1.25s

The equation would be

1.25s + s = 4500

2.25s = 4500

Answer:

Yes. At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the fish in all Florida lakes have different mercury than the allowable amount.

The random variable is the sample mean amount of mercury in the bass fish from the lakes of Florida.

The population parameter is the mean amount of mercury in the bass fish of Florida lakes.

The alternative hypothesis (Ha) states that the amount of mercury significantly differs from 1 mg/kg.

The null hypothesis (H0) states that the amount of mercury is not significantly different from 1 mg/kg.

[tex]H_0: \mu=1\\\\H_a:\mu\neq 1[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

The question is incomplete.

There is no data provided.

We will work with a sample mean of 0.95 mg/kg and sample standard deviation of 0.15 mg/kg to show the procedure.

This is a hypothesis test for the population mean.

The claim is that the fish in all Florida lakes have different mercury than the allowable amount (1 mg of mercury per kg of fish).

Then, the null and alternative hypothesis are:

[tex]H_0: \mu=1\\\\H_a:\mu\neq 1[/tex]

The significance level is assumed to be 0.05.

The sample has a size n=53.

The sample mean is M=0.95.

As the standard deviation of the population is not known, we estimate it with the sample standard deviation, that has a value of s=0.15.

The estimated standard error of the mean is computed using the formula:

[tex]s_M=\dfrac{s}{\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{0.15}{\sqrt{53}}=0.0206[/tex]

Then, we can calculate the t-statistic as:

[tex]t=\dfrac{M-\mu}{s/\sqrt{n}}=\dfrac{0.95-1}{0.0206}=\dfrac{-0.05}{0.0206}=-2.427[/tex]

The degrees of freedom for this sample size are:

[tex]df=n-1=53-1=52[/tex]

This test is a two-tailed test, with 52 degrees of freedom and t=-2.427, so the P-value for this test is calculated as (using a t-table):

[tex]\text{P-value}=2\cdot P(t<-2.427)=0.019[/tex]

As the P-value (0.019) is smaller than the significance level (0.05), the effect is significant.

The null hypothesis is rejected.

At a significance level of 0.05, there is enough evidence to support the claim that the fish in all Florida lakes have different mercury than the allowable amount.

Answer:

19cm

Step-by-step explanation:

The area  of a trapezoid [tex]=\dfrac12(a+b)h[/tex] (where a and b are the parallel sides).

Given:

Area = 189 Square cm

Height, h=14cm

a=8cm

We want to find the value of the other parallel side, b.

Substitution of the given values gives:

[tex]189=\dfrac12(8+b)14\\189=7(8+b)\\$Divide both sides by 7\\8+b=27\\Subtract 8 from both sides\\b+8-8=27-8\\b=19cm[/tex]

The length of the second parallel side is 19cm.

Answer:

[tex]19.6-2.42\frac{5.8}{\sqrt{42}}=17.43[/tex]    

[tex]19.6+2.42\frac{5.8}{\sqrt{42}}=21.77[/tex]    

And the best option for this case would be:

a. (17.5, 21.7)

Step-by-step explanation:

Information given

[tex]\bar X= 19.6[/tex] represent the sample mean

[tex]\mu[/tex] population mean

[tex]\sigma= 5.8[/tex] represent the population deviation

n=42 represent the sample size  

Confidence interval

The confidence interval for the mean is given by the following formula:

[tex]\bar X \pm t_{\alpha/2}\frac{s}{\sqrt{n}}[/tex]   (1)

The degrees of freedom, given by:

[tex]df=n-1=42-1=41[/tex]

Since the Confidence is 0.98 or 98%, the significance would be [tex]\alpha=0.02[/tex] and [tex]\alpha/2 =0.1[/tex], and the critical value would be [tex]t_{\alpha/2}=2.42[/tex]

Replacing we got:

[tex]19.6-2.42\frac{5.8}{\sqrt{42}}=17.43[/tex]    

[tex]19.6+2.42\frac{5.8}{\sqrt{42}}=21.77[/tex]    

And the best option for this case would be:

a. (17.5, 21.7)

Answer:

The 98% confidence interval for the population mean is between 17.5 hours and 21.7 hours.

Answer:

You will have $29,000 in 30 years, and you need to start with about $2,772.28 to make $14,000 in 9 years

Step-by-step explanation:

To find the total investment use the equation [tex]A = P(1 + rt)[/tex]

Where A equals total investment, P is your start investment, r is your rate, and t is time.

[tex]A=2,000(1+(0.45 * 30))[/tex]

[tex]A=2,000(1+13.5)[/tex]

[tex]A=2,000*14.5[/tex]

[tex]A=29,000[/tex]

To find the start investment use the equation [tex]P = A / (1 + rt)[/tex]

[tex]P=14,000/(1+(0.45*9))[/tex]

[tex]P=14,000/(1+4.05)[/tex]

[tex]P=14,000/5.05[/tex]

[tex]P=2,772.28[/tex]