Answer:
The answer is A. 1.23
hope this helps!
Answer:
The answer is A. 1.23
Step-by-step explanation:
took the test
The school that Molly goes to is selling tickets to a spring musical. On the first day of ticket sales the school sold 10 adult tickets and 10 student tickets for a total of $260. The school took in $94 on the second day by selling 5 adult tickets and 2 student tickets. Write and solve a system of linear equations to find the price of an adult ticket and the price of a student ticket.
Answer:
Student ticket: $12, Adult ticket: $14
Equations: 260=10x+10y, 94=2x+5y
Step-by-step explanation:
Set adult tickets as y
Set student tickets as x
First day: Total made is 260 so set that equal to 10x + 10y
--> 260=10x+10y
Second day: Total made is 94 so set that equal to 2x + 5y
--> 94=2x+5y
I find it easier to have simplified terms so simplify (divide by 2) the first equation to get: 130=5x+5y
All you have to do now is solve for the two variables.
94=2x+5y - (130=5x+5y) --> x=12, y=14
PSYCHOLOGY!!! Which theory claims that individuals label emotions based on how they are interpreted?
A.
Cannon-bard theory
B.
James-Lange theory
C.
relative deprivation principle
D.
Schachter's two factor theory
Schachter's two-factor theory claims that individual labels emotions based on how they are interpreted.
What is Schachter's two-factor theory?The Schacter two-factor theory states that emotion is the product of the interplay of two variables:
Physiological excitation and Cognition.This theory suggests that physiological excitation is cognitively understood and interpreted within the setting of each encounter, resulting in the emotional experience.
The relationship between bodily arousal and how we cognitively perceive that arousal is the subject of the two-factor theory of emotion.
To put it another way, merely feeling arousal is insufficient; we must also recognize the arousal in order to interpret and experience the emotion.Learn more about Schachter's two factor theory here:
https://brainly.com/question/7118820
Answer:
James-Lange theory
Step-by-step explanation:
Please help with my ACT PRep
Answer:
it's D because in a graph y=3/4x-2 is not possible
(13x + 12x) divided by 4 = 10
What is x
Answer: x is 8/5
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
x = [tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
[tex]\frac{13x+12x}{4}[/tex] = 10 ( multiply both sides by 4 to clear the fraction )
25x = 40 ( divide both sides by 25 )
x = [tex]\frac{40}{25}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]
If p=4 and q=6, evaluate the following expression:66/p+3q
Answer:
3
Step-by-step explanation:
Since p = 4 and q = 6
Then:
66 / 4 + (3 x 6)
66 / 4 + 18
66 / 22
3
Can someone help me with these two charts please
If the compound interest paid for rupees 4000 is rupees 420 then find the
amount paid at the end of the time period
Answer:
[tex]Amount = Rs4420[/tex]
Step-by-step explanation:
Given
[tex]Principal = Rs4000[/tex]
[tex]Interest = Rs420[/tex]
Required
Determine the amount paid
This is calculated as:
[tex]Amount = Principal + Interest[/tex]
[tex]Amount = Rs4000 + Rs420[/tex]
[tex]Amount = Rs4420[/tex]
help ASAP plzzzzzzzzzzzzzz
Answer:
e = 16
Step-by-step explanation:
-5e-4e = -144
-9e = -144
e = 16
Can someone plz help me with this one problem plz I really need this to be correct!!!
Answer:
The answers would be 5.42 and 5.1.
Step-by-step explanation:
The diagram shows 5.39, so those answers would be more than the diagram shows.
find total surface area WILL FIVE BRAINLIEST
A line has an unlimited amount of points on it. Why do you think this is true?
Answer:
bc if it has no points it will go on infinitely
Step-by-step explanation:
3x + 2y = -2
2x - 2y = -18
Answer:
What’s your Question?
Step-by-step explanation:
Please look at photo and ignore already selected answer
Answer:
Question (A) firgue b is pallorgram
Question ( B) Only A is a rentengle
Question (C) is already right
Step-by-step explanation:
For a polygon with 10 sides, which equation below represents the sum of the interior angles in the polygon?
Answer:
I mean I don't know your options, but the answer is probably something like y=180x
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
1440
Step-by-step explanation:
Sum= (180)(8)=1440
Better:
Sum= (x-2)(180)
x represents the number of sides
So it would be
sum=(10-2)(180)
The answer then would be 1440
Researchers were interested in looking at air quality in different regions of the United States. The following dot plot represents the number of days in a certain month that the air quality was unhealthy for eighteen cities in the Midwest.
10
Days
Which of the following box plots represents the same data displayed on the dot plot above?
Answer:
b
Step-by-step explanation:
you have to find the mean of the equation
Trevor built 8 birdcages to sell at the Connellsville Craft Show. He hopes to earn $112. Trevor will write an equation for p, the price in dollars he will charge for each birdcage.
A. Write an equation for the scenario.
B. What value of p makes the equation true? Explain how you found your answer.
C. Suppose Trevor decided he wants to earn $270 with the 8 birdcages. Write an
equation he could use to find p, the price in dollars he should charge for each birdcage. Tell how much Trevor should charge now, and explain why your answer is correct.
Answer:
a, 112/8
b, $14, found it by dividing
c, 270/8. Now he should charge $33.75. This is correct because 33.75*8=270
Step-by-step explanation:
Which of the following numbers are irrational?
Answer:
c.
hope it helps :)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
B. Pi
Step-by-step explanation:
Pi is an irrational number---you can't write it down as a non-infinite decimal. This means you need an approximate value for Pi. The simplest approximation for Pi is just 3.
log (z ^ 3)/(x ^ 4 * y ^ 5) with steps please
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
what is the probability of having a standard deck of 52 cards, while having a 3 card hand and getting dealt a jack and a king.
Answer:
The deck of 52 playing cards is broadly classified into 2 which are further divided into 2 divisions.
Red(26 cards) and Black(26 cards).
The red cards are further divided into diamonds♦️ (13 cards) and hearts♥️ (13 cards).
The black cards are further divided into clubs♣️(13 cards) and spades♠️(13 cards).
In each division of 13 cards classified above, there are/is-
3 face cards- King, Queen, Jack
One ace card
9 number cards(numbered from 2–10)
So, there are twelve face cards in a deck.
When three cards are picked, you may pick any three face cards out of the 12 face cards.
P(getting 3 face cards)=
No. of favourable face cards/ Total cards I.e,
12C3/52C3. By solving it we get 22/22100
=0.00995
Step-by-step explanation:
Hey need more help with this test dont answer if you dont know
PLEASE HELP 20 POINTS!
Answer:
20/132
Step-by-step explanation:
There is a 5/12 chance of event A happening, Event B has a 4/11 chance happening so you multiply the chances together and get 20/132
Suppose a scientist has 13 liters of acid and she needs 16 liters for an experiment.
How many more liters of acid does she need for the experiment?
Which equation best describes this situation?
a. 16+x=13
b. 13+x=16
c. x=13
d. x=16
HELP!!!!The area of a sector is 120pi with a radius of 20. What is the measure of that central angle?
A. 22
B. 108
C. 216
D. 11
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
22
what's 28.782 to the nearest degree?
Answer:
I really dont know so u do it
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer: It's 29 degrees.
Which statement is true? A The greatest common factor of 10 and 14 is 5. B The greatest common factor of 10 and 15 is 5. C The greatest common factor of 13 and 21 is 3. D The greatest common factor of 14 and 21 is 3.
Helppppp
needdddd it
Answer:
angle don+angle gil=90°
don+ 74°=90°
don=90°-74°
don=16°
angle e + angle a=180°
128°+angle a=180°
angle a=180°-128°
angle a=52°
Answer:
1. 16°
2. 52°
Step-by-step explanation:
So!! Complementary angles add up to 90 degrees, and supplementary angles add up to 180 degrees. With this, it should be really easy. To find the measure of angle DON:
m∠DON + m∠OIL = 90°
m∠DON + 74°=90°
m∠DON=16°
For the measure of angle A:
m∠A+m∠E=180°
m∠A+128°=180°
m∠A=52°
Hope this helped!
A car travels 30 km in 5.5 hours and 400 km in 5.5 hours find the average speed of the car during the entire journey
Answer:
This is your answer
Answer: 39.09 km per hour average
Step-by-step explanation:
add total distance and divide by total time
(30+400)/(5.5+5.5)
430/11=39.0909
you buy two packages of almonds and mix them together into one bowl one package is 4.08 kg and the other is 6.81 kg how much is in the bowl
Please help with this its confusing somehow :(
Answer: C.
Step-by-step explanation: divide -27 by 3
can someone help plz?
Answer:
The answer is: Yes
Step-by-step explanation:
1. Substitute the 2's for the x's.
2. Substitute the 3's for the y's
3. You get 4-9= -5
4. Do the same for the second problem.
5. 8-12= -4
6. Both problems are correct once the substitutions are made, therefore the answer is "Yes".
Answer:
REASONS TO KEEP OUR PROMISES
1. Introduction
Promises are valuable because they allow us to receive assurances that others will act in
certain ways and give these assurances ourselves. Assurances are worthwhile because they
can give us peace of mind, we can use them to establish and stabilize private schemes of
cooperation and, anyway, we often have good reason to want people to do (or not do) certain
things. The obligation to keep a promise derives in some way from the value that assurances
provide.1
Accounts of our fiduciary obligations divide over the role they assign to social practices.
David Hume and John Rawls argue that promising creates in others the relevant assurances
only if there exists a social practice of promising in which most everyone knows that people
generally fulfill their promises. These philosophers think that our fiduciary obligations
depend essentially on an institution of promising, but they disagree about why we have an
obligation not to violate its rules. Hume seems to think that promise-breaking is wrong in
virtue of impartial disapproval towards acts that undermine the practice of promising while
Rawls argues that it is wrong to break a promise because doing so exploits a just institution of promising from which we have voluntarily benefited.2
In contrast to these practice views,
Thomas Scanlon maintains that our obligation to keep a promise does not necessarily depend
on any social convention; instead, he argues that we ought to keep our promises because we
have a duty not to frustrate certain expectations that our promising can induce in others.3
These three views are often presented as competing accounts of the most fundamental
reason why we should keep our promises. I believe that none of them, however, can explain
our fiduciary obligations in all (or most) cases that involve binding promises. Scanlon’s
expectation view is subject to a fatal circularity in paradigm cases in which our only reason
to keep a promise is an awareness that, having made a promise, we are obligated to keep it.
Hume’s view cannot explain why we ought to keep a promise the breaking of which is
unlikely to undermine the institution of promising. And Rawls’ view (along with Hume’s)
cannot explain why it is wrong to break promises that are made when no social practice of
promising exists. Moreover, neither practice views nor expectation views alone can fully
explain the wrongs involved in breaking promises that both invoke the rules of a social
practice of promising and lead others to form certain expectations about our actions. This
suggests that there is no single, fundamental reason why we should keep our promises.
After arguing for these claims, I go on to sketch an alternative account according to
which a family of fiduciary principles, including ones similar to those suggested by Hume,
Rawls and Scanlon, explains why we ought to keep our promises. A principle is a fiduciary
principle if it explains why one or more promises are binding. On this view, no single fiduciary principle explains why all binding promises generate obligations and often one or
more fiduciary principle will apply in a given case, possibly over-determining why we should
keep that promise. For example, principles of the sort proposed by Rawls and Scanlon would
each give us sufficient reason to keep a promise that invokes the rules of a just institution of
promising and also arouses certain expectations in others. A pluralist account of this sort, I
argue, provides a better framework for understanding the nature of our fiduciary obligations.