Answer:
Italy was one of the Allied powers during World War I, and had expected to receive significant territorial gains and other benefits as a result of its participation in the war. However, the Treaty of Versailles, which ended the war, did not fully satisfy Italy's demands and left the country feeling resentful towards the other Allied powers.
Specifically, Italy had hoped to gain territory in the Balkans and along the Adriatic coast, in order to create a "greater Italy" that would include ethnic Italian populations in these areas. However, the treaty did not grant Italy all of the territory that it had hoped for, and instead awarded many of these areas to other countries, such as Yugoslavia.
Additionally, Italy had expected to receive significant economic benefits from the war, including access to raw materials and trade opportunities. However, the treaty did not provide Italy with the economic advantages that it had hoped for, and instead imposed significant financial burdens on the country.
Overall, the Treaty of Versailles left Italy feeling resentful towards the other Allied powers, as it felt that its contributions to the war had not been fully recognized or rewarded. This resentment contributed to the rise of nationalist and fascist movements in Italy, such as the National Fascist Party led by Benito Mussolini, who promised to restore Italian pride and greatness through aggressive expansionism and militarism.
Please help me I don’t know
The armies of North Vietnam and South Vietnam differed in several ways such as:
North Vietnamese army was a well-trained, well-organized, and highly motivated fighting force.South Vietnamese army was plagued by corruption, poor leadership, and low morale. Both sides experienced significant casualties during the war. How did the North and South Vietnamese compare?The North Vietnamese army, known as the People's Army of Vietnam (PAVN), was a well-trained, well-organized, and highly motivated fighting force. It was composed of a mix of regular troops and guerrilla fighters who used guerrilla tactics and were highly effective in their ability to adapt to changing situations on the battlefield.
In contrast, the South Vietnamese army, known as the Army of the Republic of Vietnam (ARVN), was plagued by corruption, poor leadership, and low morale. Its troops were poorly trained and equipped, and it relied heavily on U.S. military aid and support.
One similarity between the armies of North Vietnam and South Vietnam was that both sides experienced significant casualties during the war.
Find out more on the Vietnam War at https://brainly.com/question/15105719
#SPJ1
Which Democratic candidate did many Mexican-Americans support because of the candidate's support of Hugo Chavez and his fight for equality?
Eugene McCarthy
Robert Kennedy
Lyndon Johnson
Hubert Humphrey
Many Mexican-Americans supported Eugene McCarthy as he was seen as a candidate who supported Hugo Chavez and his fight for equality. The Option A is correct
Why was McCarthy, a Democratic candidate supported?McCarthy, a Democratic candidate who ran for President in 1968, was known for his anti-war stance and his support for civil rights. His vocal criticism of the Vietnam War and his progressive stance on social issues resonated with many Mexican-Americans who were opposed to U.S. military intervention in Latin America and sought greater equality and social justice.
McCarthy's support for Hugo Chavez, the former President of Venezuela who was known for his socialist policies and anti-imperialist stance, also appealed to Mexican-Americans who saw Chavez as a champion of the poor and marginalized in Latin America. Chavez's efforts to nationalize Venezuela's oil industry and use its resources to fund social welfare programs were viewed positively by some Mexican-Americans who saw parallels with their own struggles for economic and social justice in the United States.
Read more about Democratic candidate
brainly.com/question/291756
#SPJ1
Impact of pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation by the Nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1946
The Nazi regime in Germany during the period 1933 to 1946 was notorious for its pseudoscientific ideas of race and its brutal treatment of minority groups, particularly the Jewish population.
What was Nazi regime?The Nazi regime was a fascist government led by Adolf Hitler in Germany from 1933 to 1945. During this time, the Nazis implemented policies of racism, anti-Semitism, and totalitarianism. They believed in the superiority of the Aryan race and sought to create a "pure" German nation by purging it of "inferior" elements, including Jews, homosexuals, disabled individuals, and others. The regime also waged aggressive wars of expansion and conquest, leading to the deaths of millions of people. The Nazi regime was ultimately defeated in World War II, and its leaders were tried and convicted of war crimes and crimes against humanity at the Nuremberg Trials.
To learn more about Nazi regime, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/29811895
#SPJ1
Complete Question:
Impact of pseudoscientific ideas of race on the Jewish nation by the Nazi Germany during the period 1933 to 1946?
what does robert putnam believe is the single most important consequence of the television revolution of the latter part of the 20th century?
Answer: What does Robert Putnam believe is the single most important consequence of the television revolution of the latter part of the 20th century? ((People stayed home and watch TV and have less interaction with others.))
Explanation: sorry if this isn't what your looking for!
but hope it helps at least a bit!
Explain what the Little Rock school desegregation crisis was about and then explain what finally led to the integration of the Little Rock central and Arkansas schools .
Answer:
Here ya go
Explanation:The Little Rock school desegregation crisis was a significant event in the Civil Rights Movement that occurred in 1957 in Little Rock, Arkansas, USA. The crisis began when the Little Rock School Board adopted a plan to desegregate the city's schools in compliance with the U.S. Supreme Court's ruling in Brown v. Board of Education in 1954, which declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional. However, the plan was met with resistance from some members of the white community who opposed integration and wanted to maintain the segregation of the schools.
On September 4, 1957, nine African American students, known as the "Little Rock Nine," attempted to enroll at Little Rock Central High School, which had previously been an all-white school. However, they were met with a violent mob of white protesters who physically blocked them from entering the school. The Arkansas National Guard was sent in by Governor Orval Faubus to prevent the students from entering, citing concerns for their safety. President Dwight D. Eisenhower then ordered federal troops to intervene and enforce the integration of the school, leading to a standoff between federal troops and the National Guard.
After several weeks of tension and violence, the Little Rock Nine were finally able to attend classes at Little Rock Central High School under the protection of federal troops. The crisis brought national attention to the issue of desegregation and highlighted the resistance of some white Americans to the Civil Rights Movement.
The integration of the Little Rock Central and Arkansas schools was finally achieved through a combination of federal intervention, legal action, and activism by civil rights organizations and individuals. The Little Rock School District continued to face legal challenges to its desegregation efforts throughout the 1960s and 1970s, but the crisis served as a catalyst for the larger push towards desegregation and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which outlawed segregation in public schools and other public facilities. The Little Rock Nine and their supporters also paved the way for other African American students to attend integrated schools and helped to inspire further activism in the Civil Rights Movement.
explain how japan's geographic location affected the course of early japanese history, as well as the political and social institutions that arose there.
Answer:
Japan's geographic location had a significant impact on the course of early Japanese history and the political and social institutions that arose there.
Japan is an archipelago located off the coast of East Asia, and its isolation from the Asian mainland allowed it to develop a unique culture that was distinct from neighboring countries. The sea provided Japan with a natural barrier that protected it from invasion, while also providing abundant marine resources that supported its economy and culture.
This isolation also allowed the Japanese to develop their own political and social institutions, which were influenced by indigenous traditions and ideas borrowed from neighboring cultures such as China and Korea. The early political system in Japan was based on a decentralized system of clans, with powerful local leaders known as daimyo controlling their own territories and vying for power and influence. This system persisted until the late 16th century, when the central government under the Tokugawa shogunate was established, leading to a period of relative political stability and social order that lasted until the mid-19th century.
The geography of Japan also influenced the development of its social institutions, particularly in the areas of religion and art. Shinto, the indigenous religion of Japan, was closely tied to the natural world, with a focus on the worship of kami, or spirits, that were believed to reside in natural features such as mountains, rivers, and trees. This emphasis on the natural world also influenced the development of Japanese art, particularly the tradition of landscape painting, which focused on capturing the beauty of Japan's natural environment.
In summary, Japan's geographic location and isolation from the Asian mainland allowed it to develop a unique culture and political system that were influenced by indigenous traditions and ideas borrowed from neighboring cultures. This led to the development of a decentralized political system based on powerful local leaders and a social system that emphasized the importance of nature and the natural world.
The geographic location affected the course of early Japanese history because Japan is an archipelago. This means that Japan is made up of many islands and this made each island fairly isolated and they had their own cultures.
Max Weber defined a state by the fact that it holds a legitimate monopoly over the use of
coercive force. Yet the use of force by the state on its own people is often the most
controversial and delegitimizing action that it takes. Describe the delicate balancing act the
modern state must perform in order to ensure its rules are followed without weakening its
legitimacy.
The modern state faces delicate balancing act in ensuring that its rules are followed while maintaining its legitimacy.
What is delicate balancing act?A delicate balancing act refers to the act of carefully managing various elements or factors in a situation to maintain a desired outcome. It is often used to describe situations where multiple competing interests or priorities must be taken into account to achieve a goal. The act of balancing requires careful consideration and decision-making, as any deviation from the ideal balance can have significant consequences. Balancing acts can be found in a wide range of contexts, such as in interpersonal relationships, business operations, and government policies. It often requires compromise, negotiation, and adaptability to changing circumstances. Successfully managing a delicate balancing act requires skill, patience, and the ability to make tough decisions in the face of uncertainty.
To learn more about government, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/9386829
#SPJ1
what was not one of the advantages the british had during the us war of independence? question 1 options: experienced soldiers and officers knowledge of the land most powerful navy in the world most black colonists and native americans supported them
The British had many advantages during the American War of Independence such as experienced soldiers and officers, knowledge of the land, and the most powerful navy in the world.
The correct options are A, B and C.
However, one advantage they did not have was most black colonists and Native Americans supporting them. Although there were some black colonists and Native Americans who supported the British, the majority of them sided with the American forces.
This lack of support was a major disadvantage for the British as they were unable to effectively harness the resources of these groups. The British were also hampered by the fact that they were fighting a war of attrition on a distant battlefield, whereas the Americans enjoyed the support of the home front. These factors, among others, ultimately contributed to the British losing the war.
The correct options are A, B and C.
To know more about British , click here:
https://brainly.com/question/2280126
#SPJ4
what happened to the 135 enslaved persons who in 1841 seized the ship, the creole, and sailed to nassau in search of freedom?
The 135 enslaved persons who seized the ship, the Creole, in 1841 sailed to Nassau and were granted their freedom by the British authorities.
The Creole was a ship that was transporting enslaved persons from Virginia to New Orleans in 1841. During the voyage, the enslaved persons rebelled and seized control of the ship. They sailed to Nassau in the Bahamas, where they were granted their freedom by the British authorities. This incident was significant because it challenged the legality of slavery and the practice of transporting enslaved persons on ships. The British authorities' decision to grant the enslaved persons their freedom also strained relations between the United States and Britain, as the US government demanded the return of the enslaved persons and compensation for their loss. The incident highlighted the tensions and contradictions of the US government's support for slavery and its professed commitment to freedom and democracy.
Learn more about Creole here:
https://brainly.com/question/12024713
#SPJ11
Do you believe the president's power should be increased or reduced?
Answer:
hm
Explanation:
Those who advocate for reducing the power of the president often argue that concentrating too much power in the hands of a single person can lead to abuse of power, corruption, and authoritarianism. This is especially true if the president has unchecked powers, such as the ability to make executive orders without congressional approval or to bypass the judicial system.
Furthermore, some argue that the presidency's powers have expanded too much over time, leading to a bloated bureaucracy that can slow down government decision-making and responsiveness to the public's needs. The checks and balances in the American political system are intended to limit any one branch of government's power, including the executive branch.
On the other hand, supporters of increasing presidential power argue that a strong and decisive leader is necessary for effective governance and decision-making, especially during times of crisis or emergency. They also argue that the current system of checks and balances can sometimes lead to gridlock and inefficiency, making it difficult for the government to respond to urgent issues effectively.
Ultimately, whether the president's power should be increased or reduced depends on one's values and beliefs about the appropriate balance of power between the executive, legislative, and judicial branches of government. It is up to the American people and their elected representatives to decide how to structure their government and allocate power among its various branches.
Tolstoy argues that all patriotism is problematic because it leads to aggression of one country
against another. What does this mean for American patriotism? Please explain and assess his argument.
Tolstoy's argument against patriotism is that it inevitably leads to aggression towards other countries, as it creates an us vs them mentality that promotes idea that one's own country is superior to others.
What is patriotism?Patriotism refers to a deep love and devotion towards one's country. It involves feelings of loyalty, commitment, and pride towards the nation and its people. Patriotic individuals believe in the ideals and values of their country and are willing to defend them against internal and external threats. Patriotism can manifest in various forms, including serving in the military, participating in civic activities, displaying national symbols, and supporting the country's leaders and institutions. However, patriotism should not be confused with nationalism, which can lead to a narrow-minded and exclusive view of the world. Instead, true patriotism embraces diversity, respects human rights, and promotes the common good for all members of society.
To learn more about patriotism, visit:
https://brainly.com/question/14699055
#SPJ1
between the spring and fall of 1917, how did the demands and actions of soldiers and peasants reinforce each other and help to promote land seizures?
I think the answer is A. SORRY F RONG
What are three groups of people that have been denied the right to vote?
Answer:
below
Explanation:
Women: For much of human history, women have been denied the right to vote. It wasn't until the 19th Amendment was ratified in 1920 that women were granted suffrage in the United States. In other countries, such as Saudi Arabia, women were not granted the right to vote until much later.
People of color: In many parts of the world, people of color have been systematically denied the right to vote. This has been true in many countries, including the United States, where African Americans were often subjected to various forms of voter suppression, including poll taxes, literacy tests, and intimidation.
Young people: In some countries, the voting age has been set higher than 18, which has effectively denied young people the right to vote. Additionally, in some places, young people have been denied the right to vote because they are not considered to be mature or responsible enough to make informed decisions.
Immigrants: Non-citizens: In many countries, non-citizens are not granted the right to vote. This includes legal residents and immigrants who may have lived in a country for many years but are not yet citizens. This can be a significant issue in countries with large immigrant populations, where non-citizens may have a significant stake in the political system but are unable to participate fully in it.
9. Based on the article, all of the following tactics were used after the Civil War to oppress black people except?
A. Outlawing of redlining, a discriminatory lending practice, which kept African-Americans out of certain neighborhoods
B. Jim Crow kept blacks and whites separated [separated]
C. "Black Codes" made it easier to arrest African-Americans then "lease" them out for work
D. White supremacist groups like the Ku Klux Klan terrorized black communities.
E. Voting laws kept African-Americans from casting ballots.
Answer:
(✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿)
Based on my research, all of the following tactics were used after the civil war to oppress black people except outlawing of redlining, a discriminatory lending practice, which kept African-Americans out of certain neighborhoods .
Jim Crow laws kept blacks and whites separated . “Black codes” made it easier to arrest African-Americans then “lease” them out for work. White supremacist groups like the Ku Klux Klan terrorized black communities. Voting laws kept African-Americans from casting ballots.
I hope this helps!
✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿✿
true or false. although it served as an ideology of rebellion in england, puritanism in america became an ideology of control.
True, Puritanism in America evolved into an ideology of control, despite serving as a rebellious philosophy in England.
What governed the philosophy of Puritanism?Puritans held the beliefs that one required to be in a covenant relationship with God in order to be rescued from one's sinful condition, that God had chosen to reveal redemption via preaching, and that the Holy Spirit was the energizing agent of salvation.
Which American literary works best express the concept of Puritanism?In conclusion, Puritanism is reflected in American literature as manifestations of themes of religion, morality, sin, and atonement, as well as the battle to preserve faith in a harsh and forgiving society.
What did the Puritans believe created American society?The Puritans wanted God's laws to govern their community. They believed that if they adhered to religious tenets, God would guard them. A government was initially established in the Massachusetts Bay Colony when John Winthrop took office as governor for the first time in 1630.
Learn more about Puritanism: https://brainly.com/question/917680
#SPJ1
Describe two features of the social hierarchy in elizabethan england
Answer:
The social hierarchy in Elizabethan England was characterized by a rigid class system that determined a person's status and opportunities based on their birth, wealth, and occupation. Two features of the social hierarchy in Elizabethan England were:
The importance of birth and family: In Elizabethan England, a person's status and opportunities were largely determined by their birth and family background. At the top of the social hierarchy were the nobility, who held titles such as duke, earl, or viscount, and who were often related to the queen or king. Below the nobility were the gentry, who were wealthy landowners with titles such as knight or esquire. Below the gentry were the commoners, who made up the vast majority of the population and were further divided into skilled artisans, laborers, and the urban poor. Birth and family connections were crucial in determining a person's social mobility and opportunities, as they often determined access to education, careers, and political power.The importance of patronage: Another key feature of the social hierarchy in Elizabethan England was the importance of patronage, which referred to the system of social and political alliances based on mutual support and favoritism. Patronage was particularly important for those seeking to advance their careers or social status, as it relied on the support and favor of those in positions of power. In the arts, for example, aspiring playwrights and actors often relied on the patronage of wealthy nobles or royalty to fund their work and gain access to influential audiences. Similarly, in politics, the support of influential patrons was often crucial in securing appointments or advancing one's career. Patronage often reinforced existing social hierarchies, as those in positions of power tended to favor those from similar backgrounds or with similar interests, further entrenching social inequality.
President Reagan's plan for the economy, often called Reaganomics, was based on economics. Reagan believed that
taxes and
businesses would stimulate production and
the benefits would "trickle down" to the rest of the economy. He also wanted to
President Reagan's plan for the economy, often called Reaganomics, was based on supply-side economics. Reagan believed that by reducing taxes and regulations on businesses, this would stimulate production, investment, and economic growth.
He argued that by reducing the tax burden on businesses and high-income individuals, they would have more resources to invest in new businesses, expand existing ones, and create new jobs.
Reagan's plan also emphasized the importance of controlling inflation by maintaining stable monetary policy and reducing government spending. He believed that excessive government regulation and spending were hindering economic growth and that reducing these burdens would lead to greater prosperity.
One of the key elements of Reaganomics was the theory of "trickle-down economics." This theory held that by lowering taxes on the wealthiest members of society, the benefits of increased economic growth and job creation would "trickle down" to the rest of the economy. Critics of this theory argued that it primarily benefited the wealthy and did not necessarily lead to increased economic opportunity for the middle and lower classes.
Learn more about Reaganomics at:
brainly.com/question/12814840
#SPJ4
Why did the Tang Dynasty face difficulties toward the end of its reign?
The economy struggled as China became unable to protect its long-distance trade routes.
The government suffered as friends were placed in official positions instead of skilled workers.
The economy struggled as peasants became unable to pay their increasingly higher taxes.
The government suffered as the line of succession became unclear after Gaozong’s death
The Tang Dynasty faced difficulties toward the end of its reign due to a number of factors.
Economic difficulties included an inability to protect its long-distance trade routes, with peasants unable to pay the increasingly high taxes, leading to a decline in government revenue. In addition, the government itself was weakened by the increasing prevalence of nepotism, with friends of the emperor being placed in official positions instead of those with the necessary skills.
Finally, the death of Emperor Gaozong led to an unclear line of succession, which added to the instability of the dynasty. All of these factors combined to lead to the decline of the Tang Dynasty.
To know more about Tang Dynasty, click here:
https://brainly.com/question/28701837
#SPJ4
the seneca falls declaration of sentiments included the demand that women have the right to vote. group startstrue or false
The statement "The Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments included the demand that women have the right to vote" is True.
The Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments' revolutionary attack on the institutions that constrained women in the 19th century and its radical acknowledgement of women's natural rights are what give it its historic significance. The most contentious resolution adopted during the conference was the delegate's demand for the ability to vote. The first women's rights convention to take place in the United States was the Seneca Falls Convention, which took place in Seneca Falls, New York, from July 19 to July 20, 1848. The Declaration of Sentiments, which highlighted demands for women's equality, was drafted at that assembly. The manifesto demands that women be accorded all of the same rights and advantages as males and that they be treated as full citizens of the United States. It was read the Declaration of Sentiments.
To know more about Declaration refer :
brainly.com/question/28296608
#SPJ11
what effect did the demonstrations and marches in selma in march of 1965 have on the civil rights movement?responseswithin two years, desegregation had ended in the south and racial equality had been achieved.within two years, desegregation had ended in the south and racial equality had been achieved.they had little, if any effect, on the civil rights movement.they had little, if any effect, on the civil rights movement.civil rights activists realized that nonviolent civil disobedience would not work and became more militant.civil rights activists realized that nonviolent civil disobedience would not work and became more militant.five months later, johnson signed the voting rights act and the number of black voters in the south rose.
The Selma to Montgomery marches and the events surrounding them, including the violent confrontations with state troopers and police, were a turning point in the Civil Rights Movement.
The impact of these demonstrations was significant, but it did not result in an immediate end to segregation or achieve racial equality within two years, as the first two options suggest.
Rather, the marches and the media attention they received helped to bring the issue of voting rights to the forefront of national attention. Five months after the Selma marches, President Lyndon B. Johnson signed the Voting Rights Act of 1965, which eliminated many of the legal barriers that had prevented African Americans from voting in the South. This was a major achievement for the Civil Rights Movement and resulted in a significant increase in the number of black voters in the region.
The Selma marches also had a profound impact on civil rights activists, as they demonstrated the power of nonviolent resistance in the face of violent opposition. The courage and determination of the marchers inspired many others to join the struggle for civil rights, and the momentum generated by the Selma marches helped to propel the movement forward. Overall, the Selma to Montgomery marches played a critical role in advancing the cause of civil rights in America.
Learn more about Montgomery here:
https://brainly.com/question/3021775
#SPJ11
Good listening does not require giving advice or commentary.
True
False
Please help 20 points
Answer:
True
Explanation:
True. Good listening involves giving the speaker your full attention and allowing them to express themselves without interruption or judgment. It is not necessary to give advice or commentary, as this can sometimes distract from the speaker's message and make them feel invalidated. Instead, good listening often involves reflecting back on what the speaker has said, asking clarifying questions, and showing empathy and understanding. The focus should be on understanding the speaker's perspective and feelings, rather than on providing solutions or opinions.
how did marius change the structure of roman society and government?
Gaius Marius, a prominent Roman military and political leader who lived during the Roman Republic (157-86 BCE), is known for his significant impact on the structure of Roman society and government through his military and political reforms.
Here are some ways in which Marius changed the structure of Roman society and government: Military Reforms: Marius introduced important changes to the Roman military, known as the Marian Reforms. One of the most significant reforms was the professionalization of the Roman army. Marius opened up the recruitment of soldiers to landless peasants, allowing them to enlist and serve in the legions for extended periods of time. This created a professional standing army that was loyal to their general rather than to the state.
Political Reforms: Gaius Marius also made changes to the political structure of the Roman Republic. He sought to expand his own political power by aligning with the popular party (populares) and challenging the authority of the aristocracy (optimates). Marius was elected consul seven times, which was an unprecedented feat, and he used his political influence to push for reforms that would increase the power of the common people.
Overall, Marius' reforms had a significant impact on the structure of Roman society and government, particularly in terms of the military and political spheres. His professionalization of the Roman army and his alignment with the popular party challenged the traditional power structures of the Roman Republic, shifting loyalty from the state to individual generals and contributing to the changing dynamics of Roman politics during this period.
To learn more about Gaius Marius, visit here
https://brainly.com/question/8898240
#SPJ4
Marius significantly changed the structure of Roman society and government through his military reforms and political influence. By allowing non-property-owning citizens to join the Roman army, he created a more inclusive society.
Additionally, Marius reorganized the Roman legions, improving their efficiency and effectiveness. These changes contributed to the overall transformation of Roman society and government during his time. Gaius Marius was a Roman general and statesman who played a significant role in changing the structure of Roman society and government during the late Republic. He introduced several reforms that had a profound impact on the Roman army and its relationship with society. One of the most significant changes that Marius made was to abolish the requirement that soldiers had to own property to serve in the army. This allowed men from lower social classes to join the army and rise through the ranks based on their merit and ability, rather than their social status.
Marius also reorganized the army into a professional fighting force, rather than a citizen militia. He introduced a new system of training, equipment, and organization that made the army more efficient and effective on the battlefield. These reforms had a profound impact on Roman society and government. They weakened the power of the old aristocracy, who had previously dominated the military and political spheres, and shifted power to the professional army and the popular assemblies. They also helped to create a more meritocratic society, where individuals were judged on their abilities and achievements, rather than their social status. Overall, Marius's reforms had a lasting impact on the Roman Republic and paved the way for the rise of the Roman Empire. They transformed the Roman army into a powerful fighting force and helped to create a more inclusive and democratic society.
Learn more about Marius here: brainly.com/question/31382351
#SPJ11
What new industry, technology, and movement ramped up the American public to protest and become against the war to such a large degree America will pull out of the war?
Several student demonstrations were started when the U.S. military used napalm in Vietnam, some of which were directed towards the company that produced it, The Dow Chemical Company.
What led to Americans' opposition to the Vietnam War?Many Americans opposed the war on moral grounds because they were outraged by the death and damage it caused. While some said the conflict was a battle against Vietnamese independence or an intrusion into a foreign civil war, others claimed it had clear objectives and was unwinnable.
What impact did the anti-war movement have on American society?The anti-war campaign was successful in getting the United States to sign a peace treaty, evacuate its last remaining soldiers, and end the conscription in the beginning of 1973. During the course of a decade of organizing, anti-war demonstrators used a variety of tactics to alter public opinion and, eventually, the actions of government leaders.
Learn more about peace treaty: https://brainly.com/question/18634533
#SPJ1
Both the women’s suffrage and civil rights movements spanned decades and involved thousands. Why do you think so many Americans joined these movements? What do you think the right to vote meant to them?
Answer: Because women wanted to be equal to men.
Explanation: Back then the women didn't work it was always the men. America viewed men as better than women, men could vote but women couldn't. Women were just taking care of the house, doing errands, cooking, teaching all that stuff while men worked. The men felt like they were considered ''better'' than the women, but they were wrong. God created us all equally, if we weren't all equal, God wouldn't have created Eve for Adam but he did. No man can function properly or provide for himself without a woman there to help him. I just think the right to vote meant that the people could choose whoever was running for president to ''rule'' over them. Voting is just giving people the chance to choose whoever they feel would make America a better country and not just get in office and not fix any economical issues around the world or donate to the poor or even help fundraise anything.
the national assembly a. freed all slaves living in france b. outlawed christianity c. established gender equality d. established deism as the sate religion e. outlawed workers' associations
The correct answer is A: the national assembly freed all slaves living in France. The National Assembly in France was responsible for the abolition of slavery in the French colonies in 1794.
Christianity was not outlawed by the National Assembly, and neither was deism established as the state religion. Gender equality was not established at this time, and workers' associations were not outlawed by the National Assembly. The National Assembly outlawed workers' associations. They did not free all slaves, outlaw Christianity, establish gender equality, or establish deism as the state religion. Romans adopt Christianity. The Edict of Thessalonica, which the emperor Theodosius issued in 380 CE, declared Nicene Christianity to be the official religion of the Roman Empire. The Roman government declared the majority of other Christian sects to be heretical, stripped them of their legal standing, and seized their assets. Although they do not oppose the First Amendment or call for a theocracy, Christian nationalists do think that Christianity should have special privileges in public life.
To know more about National Assembly refer :
brainly.com/question/2052828
#SPJ11
which of the following did louis xiv of france and peter the great of russia have in common as monarchs? both rulers distrusted the people of the noble class and forced them to live in close proximity to their royal courts.
Answer:
This statement is not accurate. While both Louis XIV of France and Peter the Great of Russia were powerful absolute monarchs, they had different approaches to dealing with the noble class.Louis XIV famously brought the French nobility under his control by inviting them to live at the Palace of Versailles, where he could keep a close eye on them and reward them for their loyalty. He also established a strict etiquette and court culture that reinforced his authority and created a sense of hierarchy among the nobility.Peter the Great, on the other hand, was known for his efforts to modernize Russia and bring it into line with the other major powers of Europe. He introduced Western technologies and ideas, and he actively sought to break the power of the traditional nobility by creating a new class of nobles who owed their allegiance to the state rather than to their hereditary titles.Therefore, while both Louis XIV and Peter the Great were absolute monarchs who sought to consolidate their power, their methods of dealing with the nobility were quite different.
Louis XIV of France and Peter the Great of Russia both maintained control over the nobility by requiring them to live in close proximity to the royal court. This was a strategy to minimize potential threats from the noble class.
Explanation:Indeed, one key similarity between Louis XIV of France and Peter the Great of Russia was their shared view of the noble class as potential threats to their absolute power. Both rulers implemented strategies to keep the nobility close and under their watch.
Louis XIV mandated that the high nobility spend part of the year at his lavish palace, Versailles, effectively turning them into courtiers. In this way, he kept them preoccupied with court life and under his surveillance, ensuring they would not conspire against him.
Similarly, Peter the Great forced the Russian nobility to serve in his military or civil administration, often requiring them to reside in the capital, St. Petersburg. This was part of his efforts to modernize Russia and centralize power in the monarchy.
Learn more about monarchy here:https://brainly.com/question/31413858
#SPJ2
please help I don't remember this, whys the Asindments harder then what the teacher teaches"what purpose did the Pax Mongolia serve in the Mongol empire?
Latin meaning "Mongol empire," the Pax Mongolica refers to a time in Eurasia's history between the 13th and 14th centuries when the Mongol Empire ruled.
What exactly was the Pax Mongolica, and what did it accomplish?When the Mongolian Empire was relatively peaceful, known as the Pax Mongolica, China and Europe were able to communicate and trade at previously unheard-of levels. Only because of the Mongolian was this feasible.
What was the Pax Mongolia, and what impact did it have on trade and intellectual exchange in Asia?Along with the Silk Roads, the Pax Mongolia was a tranquil, secure trading system that allowed traders from all over Asia to send and receive products, ideas, and customs from China. Pax Mongolia encouraged trade and improved trade efficiency.
To know more about Mongol empire visit :-
https://brainly.com/question/18001458
#SPJ1
What is one similarity between the Election of 1828 results and the Election of 1824 results?
Answer:
In the election of 1824, an event took place between Henry Clay and Adams known as the "Corrupt Bargain" in which Clay promised his support to Adams in the House of Representatives. Adams was elected over Jackson but was considered a "cheater." People saw this and in result Jackson was elected president in 1828.
Explanation:
put it in your own words.
what factors may have stymied industrial development in the south? multiple select question. the southern culture the booming agricultural economy the lack of raw materials the southern climate the lack of workers
I think the answer is A..
Lincoln v. Douglas
Analyze the excerpt from Lincoln’s speech by answering the following questions in complete sentences.
Question Response
What is Lincoln’s point of view regarding the future of the country?
Which statement from the excerpt shows his point of view?
Explain how the selected quote shows Lincoln’s point of view.
Analyze the excerpt from Douglas’s speech by answering the following questions in complete sentences.
Question Response
What is Douglas’s point of view regarding the Constitution?
Which statement from the excerpt shows his point of view?
Explain how the selected quote shows Douglas’s point of view.
Reflection:
How did Lincoln’s point of view differ from that of Douglas?
Lincoln's point of view was that the future of the country should be determined by the will of the people, while Douglas's point of view was that the Constitution should be interpreted strictly to preserve the Union.
What is constitution?Constitution is a body of fundamental principles or established precedents according to which a state or other organization is acknowledged to be governed. It is the basis of any government and sets out the framework of power and responsibilities of the government, as well as the rights of its citizens.
Lincoln stated that the will of the people should be the source of political power and that the nation should be a government of the people, by the people, and for the people. Douglas, on the other hand, argued that the Constitution should be interpreted in accordance with its literal meaning and that the Union should be preserved at all costs.
To learn more about Constitution
https://brainly.com/question/28442712
#SPJ1
Answer: Lincoln's point of view was that the future of the country should be determined by the will of the people, while Douglas's point of view was that the Constitution should be interpreted strictly to preserve the Union.
i hope this helps :)