1. What are some of the jobs written about in this poem?
2. What was life like for those professions? Underline specific examples from the text to back ur claim?
3. Why should we question the accuracy of the poem's descriptions of the work of carpenters, gardeners, charcoal workers and washer men?
4.Why do you think teachers chose this poem to copy over other poems?

Answer:

true

Explanation:

Answer:

Burial places for rulers

Explanation:true

Answer:

1= economics,confederacy.

2=soldiers,spies, union

3= spies, confederacy,union

4= economics,union

5= economics,union

6= soldier=union

all can do bye!  

Explanation:

Answer:

A mountain Range

Explanation: I may have just looked it up

Answer:

a mountain range

Explanation:

Answer:

In August 1945, the two allies “in name only” (as Robinson puts it) divided control over the Korean Peninsula. Over the next three years

the Soviet Army and its proxies set up a communist regime in the area north of latitude 38˚ N, or the 38th parallel. South of that line, a military government was formed, supported directly by the United States.

Answer: nether

Explanation:

Answer:

The quebec act was passed by the british

Explanation:

Answer:

Explanation:  United States raided the borders of canada

Answer:

The geography and climate impacted the trade and economic activities of New England Colonies. In the New England towns along the coast, the colonists made their living fishing, whaling, and shipbuilding. The fish included cod, mackerel, herring, halibut, hake, bass and sturgeon.

PLS MARK ME BRAINLIEST

Have a nice time

Answer:

C

Explanation:

Answer: It was flat along the rocky coastline, which made good harbors. It became hilly and mountainous further inland. The soil was rocky, which made farming difficult.

Explanation:

Answer:

I think it's b

Explanation:

Bc it's talking ab the people

Answer:

d

Explanation:

Answer:

d i have answered this

Explanation:

Answer:

d i think

Explanation:

answer:

sample answer below

the three parts of the government were a governor, a council of advisers, and an elected assembly. the governor was something like the president, that is the commander in chief with the power to veto. the council and the assembly were like the upper and the lower houses of the parliament. the lower was closely connected to the will and the demands of the people while the upper was more into legislature.

explanation:

A

A. Plan of action: steps to open more online schools in the next four years

B. Evidence: data that shows how many students could earn a degree with this opportunity

III. Conclusion

A. Summary of my argument

Explanation:

Answer:

king tut was 9 years old when he became pharoh making him the youngest

Explanation:

Explanation:

people of u.s to be free

Answer:

The correct answer is B

Explanation:

(ignore where i got it wrong, we don't talk about that....)

Answer:

C

Explanation:

The Treaty of Tordesillas divided the New World (the Americas) between Spain and Portugal. I belive this is what was meant by option C. Hope this was helpful ^^ Good luck :D

Answer:

What the Treaty of Tordesillas does:

Explanation:

C

The Treaty of Tordesillas was a treaty between Portugal and Spain in 1494 in which they decided to divide up all the land in the Americas between the two of them, no matter who was already living there.

Answer:

petroleum

Explanation:

The US provides 11% of the countrys oil production, there for making it the largest. The country also has the largest oil reserves in the world making there prophet more.

Answer:

The Defense of the Alamo

Explanation:

Because. :)

Answer:

Explanation:At the start of the twentieth century there were approximately 250,000 Native Americans in the USA – just 0.3 per cent of the population – most living on reservations where they exercised a limited degree of self-government. During the course of the nineteenth century they had been deprived of much of their land by forced removal westwards, by a succession of treaties (which were often not honoured by the white authorities) and by military defeat by the USA as it expanded its control over the American West.  

In 1831 the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, John Marshall, had attempted to define their status. He declared that Indian tribes were ‘domestic dependent nations’ whose ‘relation to the United States resembles that of a ward to his guardian’. Marshall was, in effect, recognising that America’s Indians are unique in that, unlike any other minority, they are both separate nations and part of the United States. This helps to explain why relations between the federal government and the Native Americans have been so troubled. A guardian prepares his ward for adult independence, and so Marshall’s judgement implies that US policy should aim to assimilate Native Americans into mainstream US culture. But a guardian also protects and nurtures a ward until adulthood is achieved, and therefore Marshall also suggests that the federal government has a special obligation to care for its Native American population. As a result, federal policy towards Native Americans has lurched back and forth, sometimes aiming for assimilation and, at other times, recognising its responsibility for assisting Indian development.

What complicates the story further is that (again, unlike other minorities seeking recognition of their civil rights) Indians have possessed some valuable reservation land and resources over which white Americans have cast envious eyes. Much of this was subsequently lost and, as a result, the history of Native Americans is often presented as a morality tale. White Americans, headed by the federal government, were the ‘bad guys’, cheating Indians out of their land and resources. Native Americans were the ‘good guys’, attempting to maintain a traditional way of life much more in harmony with nature and the environment than the rampant capitalism of white America, but powerless to defend their interests. Only twice, according to this narrative, did the federal government redeem itself: firstly during the Indian New Deal from 1933 to 1945, and secondly in the final decades of the century when Congress belatedly attempted to redress some Native American grievances.

Answer: Yes.

Explanation:

Answer:

The Harappan language is the unknown language or languages of the Bronze Age (2nd millennium BC) Harappan civilization (Indus Valley Civilization, or IVC). The language is unknown so most likely I don't think so but maybe.