can someone please help me?

Answer:

bc  if it has no points  it will go on infinitely

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Between 8 and 9.

Step-by-step explanation:

8^2 = 64

9^2 = 81

So square root of 75 is between 8 and 9.

The number √75 is between 8 and 9.

What is square root of a number?

A square root of a number is a value that multiplied by itself gives the same number.

Given that;

The number is,

⇒ √75

Now,

Since, The value of √75 = 8.66

And, The number 8.66 is between 8 and 9.

Thus, The number √75 is between 8 and 9.

Learn more about the square root number visit:

https://brainly.com/question/11388449

#SPJ5

Math is garbage man

Step-by-step explanation:

Bc it sucks

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: x is 8/5

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

x = [tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]\frac{13x+12x}{4}[/tex] = 10 ( multiply both sides by 4 to clear the fraction )

25x = 40 ( divide both sides by 25 )

x = [tex]\frac{40}{25}[/tex] = [tex]\frac{8}{5}[/tex]

Answer:

This is your answer

Answer:  39.09 km per hour average

Step-by-step explanation:

add total distance and divide by total time

(30+400)/(5.5+5.5)

430/11=39.0909

Using an exponential function, it is found that $11,747 will be in the account after 4 years.

An increasing exponential function is modeled by:

[tex]A(t) = A(0)(1 + r)^t[/tex]

In which:

In this problem, considering the initial investment of $7,400, and the fact that it doubles every 6 years, the equation is given by:

[tex]A(t) = 7400(2)^{\frac{t}{6}}[/tex]

Hence the amount in 4 years is given by:

[tex]A(4) = 7400(2)^{\frac{4}{6}} = 11747[/tex]

More can be learned about exponential functions at https://brainly.com/question/25537936

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

11747

Answer:

slope(m) =3

given point (X1,y1 ) )=(2,5)

equation of line=y-y1= m(x-x1)

y-5=3(x+2)

3x-y+11=0

Answer:

y=3x-1

Step-by-step explanation:

y-y1=m(x-x1)

y-5=3(x-2)

y=3x-6+5

y=3x-1

Answer:

[tex]Amount = Rs4420[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Given

[tex]Principal = Rs4000[/tex]

[tex]Interest = Rs420[/tex]

Required

Determine the amount paid

This is calculated as:

[tex]Amount = Principal + Interest[/tex]

[tex]Amount = Rs4000 + Rs420[/tex]

[tex]Amount = Rs4420[/tex]

Answer:

7. If m∠AEB = 75°, then m∠AED = 105.

8. If m∠1 = 35°, then m∠4 = 35.

Answer:

tgtt

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

We have sin² x + cos² x =1 for all real x.

Therefore, sin² x = 1 – cos² x = 1 – (8/17)² = 1 – 64/289 = 225/289 = (15/17)².

However, remember that if x² = a², then x can be +a or –a.

Therefore, sin x can be either –15/17 or +15/17.

Everyone but Anirban so far has forgotten the negative solution.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that sinθ=817 and cosθ<0 , we have: cosθ=−√1−sin2θ. cosθ=−√1−(817)2. cosθ=−√1−64289.

Answer:

R=155°

S=25°

T=155°

Step-by-step explanation:

R + 25° =180°

R = 180° - 25°

R = 155°

(2) S + 155° =180°

S = 180° - 155°

S = 25°

T = R because t is opposite of r

I hope this was helpful

Answer:

answer is 5900 calories. hope this helps

Answer: 50

Step-by-step explanation:

First let's set up an equation by calling the score he needs to get, x:

[tex]\frac{58 + 88 + 80 + 70 + x }{5}[/tex] = 75

58 + 88 + 80 + 70 + x = 75 x 5

296 + x = 375

x = 79

Karl scored 79 marks in 5th test.

The ratio of the sum of the values in a particular set to all the values in the set is the mean value, which is the definition of the average.

Average = (Sum of values)/(Total number of values).

Given:

Karl earned scores of 58, 88, 80, and 70.

The average of 5 test = 75

let the marks scored in 5th test is x.

Then, (x+ 58 + 88 + 80 + 70)/ 5= 75

x+ 58 + 88 + 80 + 70 = 375

x + 296 = 375

x= 375- 296

x = 79

Hence, the marks on 5th test is 79.

Learn more about Average here:

https://brainly.com/question/27193544

#SPJ2

Answer:

The answer is: Yes

Step-by-step explanation:

1. Substitute the 2's for the x's.

2. Substitute the 3's for the y's

3. You get 4-9= -5

4. Do the same for the second problem.

5. 8-12= -4

6. Both problems are correct once the substitutions are made, therefore the answer is "Yes".

Answer:

REASONS TO KEEP OUR PROMISES

1. Introduction

Promises are valuable because they allow us to receive assurances that others will act in

certain ways and give these assurances ourselves. Assurances are worthwhile because they

can give us peace of mind, we can use them to establish and stabilize private schemes of

cooperation and, anyway, we often have good reason to want people to do (or not do) certain

things. The obligation to keep a promise derives in some way from the value that assurances

provide.1

Accounts of our fiduciary obligations divide over the role they assign to social practices.

David Hume and John Rawls argue that promising creates in others the relevant assurances

only if there exists a social practice of promising in which most everyone knows that people

generally fulfill their promises. These philosophers think that our fiduciary obligations

depend essentially on an institution of promising, but they disagree about why we have an

obligation not to violate its rules. Hume seems to think that promise-breaking is wrong in

virtue of impartial disapproval towards acts that undermine the practice of promising while

Rawls argues that it is wrong to break a promise because doing so exploits a just institution of promising from which we have voluntarily benefited.2

In contrast to these practice views,

Thomas Scanlon maintains that our obligation to keep a promise does not necessarily depend

on any social convention; instead, he argues that we ought to keep our promises because we

have a duty not to frustrate certain expectations that our promising can induce in others.3

These three views are often presented as competing accounts of the most fundamental

reason why we should keep our promises. I believe that none of them, however, can explain

our fiduciary obligations in all (or most) cases that involve binding promises. Scanlon’s

expectation view is subject to a fatal circularity in paradigm cases in which our only reason

to keep a promise is an awareness that, having made a promise, we are obligated to keep it.

Hume’s view cannot explain why we ought to keep a promise the breaking of which is

unlikely to undermine the institution of promising. And Rawls’ view (along with Hume’s)

cannot explain why it is wrong to break promises that are made when no social practice of

promising exists. Moreover, neither practice views nor expectation views alone can fully

explain the wrongs involved in breaking promises that both invoke the rules of a social

practice of promising and lead others to form certain expectations about our actions. This

suggests that there is no single, fundamental reason why we should keep our promises.

After arguing for these claims, I go on to sketch an alternative account according to

which a family of fiduciary principles, including ones similar to those suggested by Hume,

Rawls and Scanlon, explains why we ought to keep our promises. A principle is a fiduciary

principle if it explains why one or more promises are binding. On this view, no single fiduciary principle explains why all binding promises generate obligations and often one or

more fiduciary principle will apply in a given case, possibly over-determining why we should

keep that promise. For example, principles of the sort proposed by Rawls and Scanlon would

each give us sufficient reason to keep a promise that invokes the rules of a just institution of

promising and also arouses certain expectations in others. A pluralist account of this sort, I

argue, provides a better framework for understanding the nature of our fiduciary obligations.

Answer:

I mean I don't know your options, but the answer is probably something like y=180x

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

1440

Step-by-step explanation:

Sum= (180)(8)=1440

Better:

Sum= (x-2)(180)

x represents the number of sides

So it would be

sum=(10-2)(180)

The answer then would be 1440

Answer:

What’s your Question?

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

tan P=8/15

tan Q=15/8

Step-by-step explanation:

tan P=opposite/adjacent, where 8 is the opposite, while 15 is the adjacent.

tanQ=opposite/adjacent, where 15 is the opposite, while 8 is the adjacent.

Answer:

The Median is 6.5

Step-by-step explanation:

Other options in case

Mean - 6

Median - 6.5

Mode - 7

Range - 6

Answer:

60 degrees

Step-by-step explanation:

Triangles always equal to = 180 degrees

with that being said 70 + 50 = 120

You can subtract 120 from 180

120 - 180 = 60 degrees

Your answer is A. 60 degrees

Answer:

B

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Question (A) firgue b is pallorgram

Question ( B) Only A is a rentengle

Question (C) is already right

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

yes

Step-by-step explanation:

I think it is b too!!!

Answer:

Yes B is the right answer.