Choose Yes or No to tell whether the Addition Property of Inequality can be used to solve each statement. W – 4 > –10 12 ≥ 20x 7y10 ≤ 5. 5 –3. 25 < x – 9. 75

The length from point A to point B on the clock is approximately 24.083 cm, which is closest to 24 cm. This is calculated using the Pythagorean theorem.

Using the Pythagorean theorem, we can calculate the length from point A to point B as follows

First, we need to find the length of the vertical line segment from point D to point A. This is equal to the radius of the clock, which is 24 cm.

Next, we can find the length of the horizontal line segment from point D to point B. This is equal to the distance from the top of the clock at point D to the hanger at point B, which is given as 2 cm.

Now, we can use the Pythagorean theorem to find the length from point A to point B

AB² = AD² + DB²

AB² = (24 cm)² + (2 cm)²

AB² = 576 cm² + 4 cm²

AB² = 580 cm²

AB ≈ 24.083 cm

Therefore, the length from point A to point B is approximately 24.083 cm, which is closest to 24 cm.

To know more about Pythagorean theorem:

https://brainly.com/question/14930619

#SPJ1

Answer:

The length from point A to point B on the clock is approximately 24.083 cm, which is closest to 24 cm. This is calculated using the Pythagorean theorem.

Hope this helps :)

Pls brainliest...

Answer: 4080

Step-by-step explanation:

First you have to find the area of the triangle. 24*10 = 240. 240/2 = 120. Then you multiply the area of the triangle and multiply it by 34. 120 * 34 = 4080. This means the answer is 4080

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

You want to know if the fractions (2 1/2)/(6.5) and (5/8)/(1 5/8) are in a proportional relationship, and the simplest form of each.

Equivalent fractions can be found by multiplying numerator and denominator by the same number.

  (2 1/2)/(6.5) = 2·(2 1/2)/(2·6.5) = 5/13

  (5/8)/(1 5/8) = 8(5/8)/(8·(1 5/8)) = 5/(8+5) = 5/13

Both fractions are equivalent to 5/13, so their relationship is proportional.

The correct statement is that a fairly strong negative linear relationship exists between the x and y variables.

The correlation coefficient is a measure of the strength and direction of the linear relationship between two variables. It ranges from -1 to 1, where a value of -1 indicates a perfect negative correlation, 0 indicates no correlation, and 1 indicates a perfect positive correlation.

In this case, the correlation coefficient is -0.88, which indicates a strong negative linear relationship between the x and y variables. This means that as the value of x increases, the value of y decreases in a predictable manner.

The negative sign of the correlation coefficient indicates that the relationship is negative, meaning that as one variable increases, the other variable tends to decrease. The absolute value of the correlation coefficient, 0.88, indicates a strong relationship, meaning that the values of the two variables are closely related and can be used to predict each other's values.

Therefore, the correct statement is that a fairly strong negative linear relationship exists between the x and y variables.

Learn more about correlation coefficient

brainly.com/question/15577278

#SPJ11

Answer:

x = -5, x = 1

As (x, y) coordinates, the x-intercepts are (-5, 0) and (1, 0).

Step-by-step explanation:

The x-intercepts are the x-values of the points at which the curve crosses the x-axis, so when y = 0.

From inspection of the given graph, we can see that the parabola crosses the x-axis at x = -5 and x = 1.

Therefore, the x-intercepts of the parabola are:

As (x, y) coordinates, the x-intercepts are (-5, 0) and (1, 0).

Answer:

x + y = 11

2x - y = 19

--------------

3x = 30

x = 10, so y = 1

the average speed of the plane in still air is s + 30.

Let's call the average speed of the plane in still air "s" (in miles per hour).

We can use the formula:

time = distance / speed

to find the time it takes the plane to travel from Salt Lake City to Oakland with the wind and against the wind.

With the wind:

time with wind = [tex]600 / (s + 30)[/tex]

Against the wind:

time against wind =[tex]600 / (s - 30)[/tex]

time against wind > time with wind

So we can set up an inequality:

[tex]600 / (s - 30) > 600 / (s + 30)[/tex]

Multiplying both sides by [tex](s - 30)(s + 30)[/tex], we get:

[tex]600(s + 30) > 600(s - 30)[/tex]

Expanding and simplifying, we get:

[tex]600s + 18000 > 600s - 18000[/tex]

Subtracting 600s from both sides, we get:

[tex]18000 > -18000[/tex]

This inequality is true for all values of s. In other words, there are no restrictions on the value of s that would make the return trip take longer than the trip with the wind.

Therefore, we can use the average of the two speeds (with and against the wind) to find the average speed of the plane in still air:

Average speed = [tex]2s(s + 30) / (s + 30 + s - 30)[/tex]

Simplifying, we get:

Average speed = [tex]2s(s + 30) / (2s)[/tex]

Canceling the common factor of 2s, we get:

Average speed = s + 30

We know that the distance from Salt Lake City to Oakland is 600 miles, and we can use the formula:

time = distance / speed

to find the time it takes the plane to travel this distance:

time = [tex]600 / (s + 30)[/tex]

We also know that the return trip (against the wind) takes longer, so we can set up another equation:

time return trip =[tex]600 / (s - 30)[/tex]

We can use these two equations to solve for s:

[tex]600 / (s + 30) = 600 / (s - 30)[/tex]

Cross-multiplying, we get:

[tex]600(s - 30) = 600(s + 30)[/tex]

Expanding and simplifying, we get:

[tex]600s - 18000 = 600s + 18000[/tex]

Subtracting 600s from both sides, we get:

[tex]-18000 = 18000[/tex]

This is not a valid equation, so there must be no solution.

However, we can still find the average speed of the plane in still air by using the equation we derived earlier:

Average speed = s + 30

So the average speed of the plane in still air is s + 30. We don't have a specific value for s, but we can say that the average speed is equal to the speed with the wind plus 30 (which is the speed of the wind).

for such more questions on average speed

https://brainly.com/question/4931057

#SPJ11

the simplified  form  of expression is: -(x² + 2x - 2)/((x+2)*(x+4))

what is expression  ?

In mathematics, an expression is a combination of numbers, variables, operators, and/or functions that represents a mathematical quantity or relationship. Expressions can be simple or complex

In the given question,

To evaluate the expression 1/(x+2) - (x+1)/(x+4), we need to find a common denominator for the two terms. The least common multiple of (x+2) and (x+4) is (x+2)(x+4).

So, we can rewrite the expression as:

(1*(x+4) - (x+1)(x+2))/((x+2)(x+4))

Expanding the brackets, we get:

(x+4 - x² - 3x - 2)/((x+2)*(x+4))

Simplifying the numerator, we get:

(-x² - 2x + 2)/((x+2)*(x+4))

Therefore, the simplified expression is:

-(x² + 2x - 2)/((x+2)*(x+4))

To know more about  Expressions , visit:

https://brainly.com/question/14083225

#SPJ1

where t is measured in days, and A(t) represents the amount of flooded land at time t. This function has a B-value of -0.3118.

To model the situation of the flood, we can use an exponential decay function, which represents the decreasing amount of flooded land over time. The function can be written as:

[tex]A(t) = A0 * e^{(-kt)}[/tex]

where A(t) is the amount of flooded land at time t, A0 is the initial amount of flooded land, k is a constant representing the rate of decay, and e is the mathematical constant approximately equal to 2.718.

To determine the value of k, we can use the given information that after 2 days, only 3375 acres of land were under water. Substituting t = 2 and A(t) = 3375 into the equation above, we get:

[tex]3375 = A0 * e^{(-2k)[/tex]

We also know that initially, there were 6000 acres of land under water. Substituting A0 = 6000 into the equation above, we get:

Dividing both sides by 6000, we get:

ln(0.5625) = -2k[tex]ln(0.5625) = -2k[/tex]

Taking the natural logarithm of both sides, we get:

[tex]ln(0.5625) = -2k[/tex]

Solving for k, we get:

[tex]k = -ln(0.5625)/2[/tex]

k ≈ 0.3118

Therefore, the function to model the situation of the flood is:

[tex]A(t) = 6000 * e^{(-0.3118t)}[/tex]

To learn more about function, visit

https://brainly.com/question/12431044

#SPJ1

The terms arranged in order from smallest to biggest are: (-2)³, -√25, √11, 10, and 4² after comparing the values of the final numbers.

We shall first simplify the numbers to get their final values and then compare to which is smaller as follows:

4² = 4 × 4 = 16

-√25 = -5

10 = 10

√11 = 3.3166

(-2)³ = -2 × -2 × -2 = -8

In conclusion, we have by comparing the final values of the numbers the terms arranged from smallest to the biggest as: (-2)³, -√25, √11, 10, and 4².

Read more about numbers here:https://brainly.com/question/1094377

#SPJ1

Answer:1.25

Step-by-step explanation:

it just math

Answer:

[tex]h(x)=2x^2-12x+9[/tex],  [tex]p(x)=-5x^2-20x-5[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

To get to the standard form of a quadratic equation, we need to expand and simplify. Recall that standard form is written like so:

[tex]ax^2+bx+c[/tex]

Where a, b, and c are constants.

Let's expand and simplify h(x).

[tex]2(x-3)^2-9=\\2(x^2+9-6x)-9=\\2x^2+18-12x-9=\\2x^2+9-12x=\\2x^2-12x+9[/tex]

Thus, [tex]h(x)=2x^2-12x+9[/tex]

Let's do the same for p(x).

[tex]-5(x+2)^2+15=\\-5(x^2+4+4x)+15=\\-5x^2-20-20x+15=\\-5x^2-5-20x=\\-5x^2-20x-5[/tex]

Thus, [tex]p(x)=-5x^2-20x-5[/tex]

D) 81 is equivalent to 27^(4/3).

The expression 27^4/3 can be simplified using the rule that (a^m)^n = a^(m*n). Therefore, we can write,

27^(4/3) = (3^3)^(4/3)

Using the power of a power rule, we can simplify further,

(3^3)^(4/3) = 3^(3*4/3)

Simplifying the exponent, we get,

3^(4)

To check the other answer choices,

A. 4^3 is not equivalent to 27^4/3.

B. (27^1/3)^4 is equivalent to 27^(4/3), which we already simplified to 3^4. Therefore, this expression is also equivalent to 3^4.

C. 3^1/4 is not equivalent to 27^4/3.

D. 81 is equivalent to 3^(4).

Therefore, the expression 27^4/3 is equivalent to 3^4, which is answer choice D) 81.

To learn more about equivalent here:

https://brainly.com/question/31532746

#SPJ4

The blue base is the face (put in 1).

The black line is the edge (put in 2).

The dot up top is the vertex (put in 3).

The Cube root of the resulting number is 8.

The smallest number that 40000 can be divided by so that the result is a perfect cube, we need to factorize 40000 into its prime factors:

[tex]40000 = 2^6 \times 5^4[/tex]

To make this a perfect cube, we need to ensure that the powers of each prime factor are multiples of 3.

The smallest number we can divide 40000 by so that the result is a perfect cube is:

[tex]40000 = 2^6 \times 5^4[/tex]

Now we can find the cube root of the resulting number:

[tex]3\sqrt (40000 \div 100) = 3\sqrt400 = 8.[/tex]

Factories 40000 into its prime components in order to determine.

The least number that the result may be divided by while still producing a perfect cube.

The powers of each prime factor must be multiples of three in order for this to be a perfect cube.

The least number that 40000 may be divided by to produce a perfect cube is:

For similar questions on Cube Root

https://brainly.com/question/26726803

#SPJ11

No, the ratio of circumference to radius is not the same for every circle.

Ratio refers to the quantitative relation between two or more values, typically expressed in the form of a fraction or a proportion.

No, the ratio of circumference to radius is not the same for every circle. The ratio of circumference to diameter, also known as pi (π), is a constant value that remains the same for every circle. It is approximately equal to 3.14 or 22/7. However, the ratio of circumference to radius varies depending on the size of the circle.

The formula for circumference of a circle is C=2πr, where C is the circumference and r is the radius. Therefore, the ratio of circumference to radius is C/r = 2π. This means that for circles of different sizes, the ratio of circumference to radius will differ since the value of pi remains the same while the radius changes.

For example, if we consider two circles, one with a radius of 2 cm and the other with a radius of 4 cm, the ratio of circumference to radius for the first circle will be 2π (since C = 2πr = 2π x 2 = 4π) and for the second circle, it will be 2π (since C = 2πr = 2π x 4 = 8π). Thus, the ratio of circumference to radius is not the same for every circle.

To know more about ratio visit:

https://brainly.com/question/12024093

#SPJ1

For the given numbers, 78 < 0. 708

To compare two numbers, we need to look at their values and determine which one is larger or smaller. In this case, we have 78 and 0.708. We can start by comparing their whole number parts, which are 78 and 0, respectively. Since 78 is greater than 0, we know that 78 is a larger number.

But what about the decimal parts of these numbers? To compare them, we need to look at the place value of each digit. The first digit after the decimal point in 78 is 0, and the first digit after the decimal point in 0.708 is 7. Since 7 is greater than 0, we know that 0.708 is a larger number than 0.78 in terms of their decimal parts.

Now that we have compared the whole number parts and decimal parts separately, we can combine the results to determine the final comparison. Since 78 is larger than 0 and 0.708 is larger than 0.78 in terms of their decimal parts, we can conclude that:

78 < 0.708

We use the symbol "<" here because 78 is smaller than 0.708.

To know more about number here

https://brainly.com/question/17429689

#SPJ4

For the given statement after evaluating both the options the correct option is true under the condition that scores increase and null hypothesis is used to find out Treatment effect.

Here, null hypothesis clearly states that there is no significant difference is observed in comparison of sample mean and population mean.

Null hypothesis refers to statistical process which takes certain assumptions regarding two sets of different variables. In the branch of science it is used to find credibility regarding a sample data.

For the given case, the null hypothesis presents   that the population mean remains unchanged (m = 60) post  treatment, doesn't matter if it is greater than or equal to 60. The alternative hypothesis will be increases the mean  for the treatment (m > 60).

To learn more about Null hypothesis,

https://brainly.com/question/4436370

#SPJ4

True. Your statement is: A researcher administers a treatment to a sample from a population with a mean of m = 60. If the treatment is expected to increase scores and a one-tailed test is used to evaluate the treatment effect, then the null hypothesis would state that m ≥ 60.

The null hypothesis typically represents no effect or no difference. In this case, the null hypothesis would state that the population mean remains unchanged (m = 60) after the treatment, not that it is greater than or equal to 60. The alternative hypothesis would be that the treatment increases the mean (m > 60).

To learn more about mean visit;

https://brainly.com/question/31101410

#SPJ11

the likelihood of Erin getting at least one bullseye in 5 throws is 0.5563 or 55.63%.

To calculate the likelihood of Erin getting at least one bullseye, we need to first calculate the probability of her not getting a bullseye in a single throw. Since she scores a bullseye 15% of the time, the probability of her not getting a bullseye in a single throw is 85% (100% - 15%).

Using the probability of not getting a bullseye in a single throw, we can use the following formula to calculate the probability of not getting a bullseye in all 5 throws:

0.85 x 0.85 x 0.85 x 0.85 x 0.85 = 0.4437

Therefore, the probability of Erin not getting a bullseye in all 5 throws is 0.4437 or 44.37%.

To calculate the probability of Erin getting at least one bullseye in 5 throws, we can subtract the probability of her not getting a bullseye in all 5 throws from 1:

1 - 0.4437 = 0.5563

Therefore, the likelihood of Erin getting at least one bullseye in 5 throws is 0.5563 or 55.63%.

learn more about probability

https://brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

The probability that Erin will get at least one bullseye in her 5 throws at the adventure arcade is approximately 55.63%.

To find the probability that she will get at least one bullseye in 5 throws, we can use the complementary probability.

This means we will first find the probability of her not getting a bullseye in all 5 throws, and then subtract that from 1.

Find the probability of not getting a bullseye (1 - bullseye probability)

1 - 0.15 = 0.85

Calculate the probability of not getting a bullseye in all 5 throws

0.85^5 ≈ 0.4437

Find the complementary probability (probability of at least one bullseye)

1 - 0.4437 ≈ 0.5563

So, the probability that Erin will get at least one bullseye in her 5 throws at the adventure arcade is approximately 55.63%.

for such more question on probability

https://brainly.com/question/13604758

#SPJ11

The chance that the number of heads will be in the range 4850 to 5150 is approximately 0.9973, or about 99.73%.

The number of heads in 10,000 coin tosses follows a binomial distribution with parameters n = 10,000 (the number of trials) and p = 0.5 (the probability of heads on a single toss).

We can approximate this binomial distribution using the normal distribution, with mean μ = np = 5000 and variance σ² = np(1-p) = 2500.

To find the probability that the number of heads is in the range 4850 to 5150, we can use the normal distribution and standardize the range using the z-score formula:

z = (x - μ) / σ

where x is the number of heads in the range we're interested in.

For the lower bound of 4850, we have:

[tex]z_lower = (4850 - 5000) / \sqrt{(2500)}[/tex]

= -3

For the upper bound of 5150, we have:

[tex]z_upper = (5150 - 5000) / \sqrt{(2500)} = 3[/tex]

Using a standard normal distribution table or calculator, we can find the probability of being within 3 standard deviations of the mean:

P([tex]z_lower[/tex]  < Z < [tex]z_upper[/tex] ) ≈ P(-3 < Z < 3)

= 0.9973.

For similar question on distribution.

https://brainly.com/question/26678388

#SPJ11

It is true that a linear programming problem can have an optimal solution that is not a corner point.

In linear programming, the optimal solution represents the point where the objective function is optimized while still satisfying all the constraints.

In some cases, the optimal solution may occur at a corner point of the feasible region, where two or more of the constraints intersect.

However, it is possible for the optimal solution to occur at a point that is not a corner point, but rather lies on an edge or a line segment of the feasible region.

This can occur when the objective function is parallel to one of the constraint lines or when there are redundant constraints that limit the feasible region.

Therefore, it is true that a linear programming problem can have an optimal solution that is not a corner point.

Learn more about linear programming.

brainly.com/question/15417573

#SPJ11

Just use the pythagorean theorem to solve the hypotenuse!

(3^2)+(2^2)=x^2

9+4=13^2

[tex]\sqrt{13}[/tex] = [tex]\sqrt{x}[/tex]

[tex]13^{2}[/tex] km

Hope this helps <3

The value of x in the intersecting chords that extend outside circle is 5

From the question, we have the following parameters that can be used in our computation:

intersecting chords that extend outside circle

Using the theorem of intersecting chords, we have

4 * (x + 6 + 4) = 6 * (x - 1 + 6)

Evaluate the like terms

So, we have

4 * (x + 10) = 6 * (x + 5)

Using a graphing tool, we have

x = 5

Hence. the value of x is 5

Read more about intersecting chords at

https://brainly.com/question/13950364

#SPJ1

The probability that the golfer will hit at least 6 times in his next 10 attempts is A. 20 %

To estimate the probability of the golfer hitting at least 6 times in his next 10 attempts using a table of random numbers, we can perform a simulation.

Let's use the given table of random numbers to simulate 10 attempts for each trial. We can consider each pair of digits as one attempt. We will perform 10 trials and count how many times the golfer hits at least 6 times in 10 attempts.

Now count the number of trials with at least 6 hits:

Trial 2, Trial 5, and Trial 9 have at least 6 hits. That's 3 out of 10 trials.

To estimate the probability, divide the number of successful trials (at least 6 hits) by the total number of trials:

Probability = (Number of successful trials) / (Total number of trials)

Probability = 3 / 10 = 0.3

The estimated probability that the golfer will hit at least 6 times in his next 10 attempts is 30%. There is no exact match among the possible answers, but the closest one is 20%.

Find out more on probability at https://brainly.com/question/30618573

#SPJ1

The only statement that is true is b, which states that the quadrilateral is a rectangle.

A quadrilateral is a polygon with four sides and four vertices. The sum of the interior angles of a quadrilateral is always 360 degrees. Quadrilaterals can have sides of different lengths and angles of different measures, giving rise to many different types of quadrilaterals with different properties.

First, we find the lengths of the sides of the quadrilateral:

AB = √[(7-6)² + (-1+4)²] = √10

BC = √[(4-7)² + (0-0)²] = 3

CD = √[(3-4)² + (-3+0)²] = √10

AD = √[(6-3)² + (-4+1)²] = √26

Then, we find the slopes of each pair of opposite sides:

AB: (7-6)/(−1+4) = 1/3

BC: (4-0)/(0-(-1)) = 4/1 = 4

CD: (-3-(-4))/(0-(-3)) = 1/3

AD: (6-3)/(-4-(-1)) = -1/5

Now we can analyze each statement:

a.) Rhombus

A rhombus is a quadrilateral with all sides of equal length. We found that AB = CD and AD ≠ BC, so not all sides are of equal length. Therefore, statement a is false.

b.) Rectangle

A rectangle is a quadrilateral with all angles equal to 90 degrees. We can find the slopes of adjacent sides and check if they are opposite reciprocals:

AB: 1/3

BC: 4

CD: 1/3

AD: -1/5

We can see that AB and CD have slopes of 1/3 and are opposite reciprocals, and BC and AD have slopes of 4 and -1/5, respectively, and are also opposite reciprocals. Therefore, all angles of the quadrilateral are 90 degrees. Also, since AB = CD and AD ≠ BC, the quadrilateral is a rectangle. Therefore, statement b is true.

c.) Square

A square is a special type of rectangle with all sides of equal length. We found that AB ≠ AD, so not all sides are of equal length. Therefore, statement c is false.

d.) None

We have determined that the quadrilateral is a rectangle, so it is not "none". Therefore, statement d is false.

Therefore, the only statement that is true is b, which states that the quadrilateral is a rectangle.

To know more about the quadrilateral and rectangle visit:

brainly.com/question/11936810

#SPJ1

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:= x+48=180 ( linier pair )

                                            = x=180-48

                                            = x=132

                                              = x+12=180 (liner pair)

                                              = x=180-12

                                              = x=168

Tim was driving for 5 hours before he caught up to Dora.

The answer is (a) 5 hours.

To solve this problem, we can use the formula:
distance = rate × time
Let's denote the time Tim drove as t hours.

Since Dora started driving one hour earlier, her driving time would be (t + 1) hours.
Dora's distance: 75 kph × (t + 1)
Tim's distance: 90 kph × t
Since Tim catches up to Dora, their distances will be equal:
75(t + 1) = 90t
Now we can solve for t:
75t + 75 = 90t
75 = 15t
t = 5.

The answer is (a) 5 hours.

For similar question on distances.

https://brainly.com/question/29657955

#SPJ11

The critical value of the chi-square distribution corresponding to a sample size of 5 and a confidence level of 98% is given as follows:

0.297 and 13.277.

To obtain a critical value, we need three parameters, given as follows:

Then, with the parameters, the critical value is found using a calculator.

The parameters for this problem are given as follows:

Using a chi-square distribution calculator, the critical values are given as follows:

0.297 and 13.277.

More can be learned about the chi-square distribution at https://brainly.com/question/4543358

#SPJ1

The 90% confidence interval for the true mean difference between the mean amount of mail-order purchases and the mean amount of internet purchases is approximately [-6.62, 22.02].

The critical value that should be used in constructing the confidence interval.

Since we are looking for a 90% confidence interval, we need to find the critical value associated with a 5% level of significance in a two-tailed test.

Using a t-distribution with (n1-1) + (n2-1) degrees of freedom and a significance level of 0.05, we find the critical value to be:

t-critical = 1.717 (using a t-distribution table or a calculator)

Step 2 of 3:

Next, we need to find the standard error of the sampling distribution to be used in constructing the confidence interval.

Since the population variances are not equal, we need to use the Welch-Satterthwaite equation to calculate the standard error:

SE = sqrt[([tex]s1^2[/tex]/n1) + ([tex]s2^2[/tex]/n2)]

where s1 and s2 are the sample standard deviations, and n1 and n2 are the sample sizes.

Substituting the given values, we get:

SE = sqrt[([tex]19.25^2[/tex]/17) + ([tex]26.25^2[/tex]/12)]

SE ≈ 8.35

Step 3 of 3:

To construct the 90% confidence interval, we can use the formula:

(mean1 - mean2) ± t-critical * SE

where mean1 and mean2 are the sample means, and t-critical and SE are the values calculated in steps 1 and 2.

Substituting the given values, we get:

= (84.80 - 77.10) ± 1.717 x 8.35

= 7.70 ± 14.32

Therefore,

The 90% confidence interval for the true mean difference between the mean amount of mail-order purchases and the mean amount of internet purchases is (approx) [-6.62, 22.02].

We can be 90% confident that the true mean difference between the mean amount of mail-order purchases and the mean amount of internet purchases falls within this interval.

For similar question on confidence interval:

https://brainly.com/question/20309162

#SPJ11