Determine the value of X....... Please

Answer:

It is unlikely.

Step-by-step explanation:

Certain = 100%

Impossible = 0%

Likely = more than 50%

Unlikely = less than 50%

It is less than 50%, so it is unlikely.

Answer:

(A) it is likely

Step-by-step explanation:

i took the test on edge

Answer:

a. p`± z₀.₀₂₅[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{p`q`}{n}[/tex]  

b.0.6 ±  1.96 [tex]\sqrt \frac{0.6* 0.4}{1000}[/tex]  

c. { -1.96 ≤  p`± z₀.₀₂₅[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{p`q`}{n}[/tex]     ≥ 1.96} = 0.95  

Step-by-step explanation:

Here the total number of trials is n= 1000

The number of successes is p` = 600/1000 = 0.6. The q` is 1 - p`= 1- 0.6 = 0.4

The degree of confidence is 95 %  therefore z₀.₀₂₅ = 1.96 ( α/2 = 0.025)

a.  The formula used will be

p`± z₀.₀₂₅[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{p`q`}{n}[/tex]       ( z with the base alpha by 2 (α/2 = 0.025))

b. Putting the values

0.6 ±  1.96 [tex]\sqrt \frac{0.6* 0.4}{1000}[/tex]  

c. Confidence Interval in Interval Notation.

{ -1.96 ≤  p`± z₀.₀₂₅[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{p`q`}{n}[/tex]     ≥ 1.96} = 0.95  

{ -z( base alpha by 2) ≤  p`± z₀.₀₂₅[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{p`q`}{n}[/tex]     ≥ z( base alpha by 2)  } = 1- α

You want to end up with [tex]A\sin(\omega t+\phi)[/tex]. Expand this using the angle sum identity for sine:

[tex]A\sin(\omega t+\phi)=A\sin(\omega t)\cos\phi+A\cos(\omega t)\sin\phi[/tex]

We want this to line up with [tex]2\sin(4\pi t)+5\cos(4\pi t)[/tex]. Right away, we know [tex]\omega=4\pi[/tex].

We also need to have

[tex]\begin{cases}A\cos\phi=2\\A\sin\phi=5\end{cases}[/tex]

Recall that [tex]\sin^2x+\cos^2x=1[/tex] for all [tex]x[/tex]; this means

[tex](A\cos\phi)^2+(A\sin\phi)^2=2^2+5^2\implies A^2=29\implies A=\sqrt{29}[/tex]

Then

[tex]\begin{cases}\cos\phi=\frac2{\sqrt{29}}\\\sin\phi=\frac5{\sqrt{29}}\end{cases}\implies\tan\phi=\dfrac{\sin\phi}{\cos\phi}=\dfrac52\implies\phi=\tan^{-1}\left(\dfrac52\right)[/tex]

So we end up with

[tex]2\sin(4\pi t)+5\cos(4\pi t)=\sqrt{29}\sin\left(4\pi t+\tan^{-1}\left(\dfrac52\right)\right)[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

In the form ...

  y(t) = Asin(ωt +φ)

you have ...

The translation from ...

  y(t) = 2sin(4πt) +5cos(4πt)

is ...

  A = √(2² +5²) = √29 . . . . the amplitude

  ω = 4π . . . . the angular frequency in radians per second

  φ = arctan(5/2) ≈ 1.1903 . . . . radians phase shift

Then, ...

  y(t) = √29·sin(4πt +1.1903)

_____

Comment on the conversion

You will notice we used "2" and "5" to find the amplitude and phase shift. In the generic case, these are "coefficient of sin( )" and "coefficient of cos( )". When determining phase shift, pay attention to whether your calculator is giving you degrees or radians. (Set the mode to what you want.)

If you have a negative coefficient for sin( ), you will need to add 180° (π radians) to the phase shift value given by the arctan( ) function.

Answer:

Null - p= 71%

Alternative - p =/ 71%

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis is always the default statement in an experiment. While the alternative hypothesis is always tested against the null hypothesis.

Null hypothesis: 71% of their readers own a personal computer- p = 71%

Alternative hypothesis: Not 71% of their readers own a personal computer - p =/ 71%

Answer:

z(c)  = - 1,64

We reject the null hypothesis

Step-by-step explanation:

We need to solve a proportion test ( one tail-test ) left test

Normal distribution

p₀ = 63 %

proportion size  p = 51 %

sample size  n = 114

At 5% level of significance   α = 0,05, and with this value we find in z- table z score of z(c) = 1,64  ( critical value )

Test of proportion:

H₀     Null Hypothesis                        p = p₀

Hₐ    Alternate Hypothesis                p < p₀

We now compute z(s) as:

z(s) =  ( p - p₀ ) / √ p₀q₀/n

z(s) =( 0,51 - 0,63) / √0,63*0,37/114

z(s) =  - 0,12 / 0,045

z(s) = - 2,66

We compare z(s) and z(c)

z(s) < z(c)      - 2,66 < -1,64

Therefore as z(s) < z(c)  z(s) is in the rejection zone we reject the null hypothesis

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the measure of third angle be X

The sum of interior angle of triangle = X

Let's create an equation

[tex]x + 32 + 90 = 180[/tex]

Add the numbers

[tex]x + 122 = 180[/tex]

Move constant to R.H.S and change its sign

[tex]x = 180 - 122[/tex]

Subtract the numbers

[tex]x = 58[/tex] °

Hope this helps...

Best regards!!

Answer:

33800

Step-by-step explanation:

100 x 338 = 33800

Answer:

33800

Step-by-step explanation:

338x10=3380 then 3380x10=33800

-------------------------------------------------------

Good luck with your assignment...

Answer:

In Table C, y vary inversely with x.

1×18 = 18

2×9 = 18

3×6 = 18

18 = 18 = 18

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given four tables and asked to find out in which table y vary inversely with x.

We know that an inverse relation has a form given by

y = k/x

xy = k

where k must be a constant

Table A:

x     |      y

1     |      3

2     |     9

3     |    27

1×3 = 3

2×9 = 18

3×27 = 81

3 ≠ 18 ≠ 81

Hence y does not vary inversely with x.

Table B:

x     |      y

1     |     -5

2     |     5

3     |    15

1×-5 = -5

2×5 = 10

3×15 = 45

-5 ≠ 10 ≠ 45

Hence y does not vary inversely with x.

Table C:

x     |      y

1     |      18

2     |     9

3     |     6

1×18 = 18

2×9 = 18

3×6 = 18

18 = 18 = 18

Hence y vary inversely with x.

Table D:

x     |      y

1     |      4

2     |     8

3     |    12

1×4 = 4

2×8 = 16

3×12 = 36

4 ≠ 16 ≠ 36

Hence y does not vary inversely with x.

Answer:

49.923 mph

Step-by-step explanation:

we know that the car traveled 133 miles in h hours at an average speed of x mph.

That is, xh = 133.

We can also write this in terms of hours driven: h = 133/x.

If x was 30 mph faster, then h would be one hour less.

That is, (x + 30)(h - 1) = 133, or h - 1 = 133/(x + 30).

We can rewrite the latter equation as h = 133/(x + 30) + 1

We can then make a system of equations using the formulas in terms of h to find x:

h = 133/x = 133/(x + 30) + 1

133/x = 133/(x + 30) + (x + 30)/(x + 30)

133/x = (133 + x + 30)/(x + 30)

133 = x*(133 + x + 30)/(x + 30)

133*(x + 30) =  x*(133 + x + 30)

133x + 3990 = 133x + x^2 + 30x

3990 = x^2 + 30x

x^2 + 30x - 3990 = 0

Using the quadratic formula:

x = [-b ± √(b^2 - 4ac)]/2a  

= [-30 ± √(30^2 - 4*1*(-3990))]/2(1)  

= [-30 ± √(900 + 15,960)]/2

= [-30 ± √(16,860)]/2

= [-30 ± 129.846]/2

= 99.846/2  -----------  x is miles per hour, and a negative value of x is neglected, so we'll use the positive value only)

= 49.923

Check if the answer is correct:

h = 133/49.923 = 2.664, so the car took 2.664 hours to drive 133 miles at an average speed of 49.923 mph.

If the car went 30 mph faster on average, then h = 133/(49.923 + 30) = 133/79.923 = 1.664, and 2.664 - 1 = 1.664.

Thus, we have confirmed that a car driving 133 miles at about 49.923 mph would have arrive precisely one hour earlier by going 30 mph faster

Answer:

Option C

Step-by-step explanation:

The whole numbers a,b and c such that [tex]a^2+b^2 = c^2[/tex] are Pythagorean triples satisfying the Pythagorean theorem.

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

a, b, and c are side lengths of the triangle.

The three side lengths that make up a right triangle are most commonly known as Pythagorean triples.

Answer:

B. The fact that two variables are strongly correlated does not in itself imply a​ cause-and-effect relationship between the variables.

Step-by-step explanation:

The term "correlation does not imply causation", simply means that because we can deduce a link between two factors or sets of data, it does not necessarily prove that there is a cause-and-effect relationship between the two variables. In some cases, there could indeed be a cause-and-effect relationship but it cannot be said for certain that this would always be the case.

While correlation shows the linear relationship between two things, causation implies that an event occurs because of another event. So the phrase is actually saying that because two factors are related, it does not mean that it is as a result of a causal factor. It could simply be a coincidence. This occurs because of our effort to seek an explanation for the occurrence of certain events.

Answer: B. The fact that two variables are strongly correlated does not in itself imply a​ cause-and-effect relationship between the variables.

Step-by-step explanation:

Sam's weight to the nearest stone is equal to 8.0 stone.

Given the following data:

To determine Sam's weight to the nearest stone:

In this exercise, you're required to determine Sam's weight to the nearest stone. Thus, we would convert his weight in kilograms to pounds and lastly to stone as follows:

Conversion:

1 kg = 2.2 pounds.

51 kg = [tex]51 \times 2.2[/tex] = 112.2 pounds.

Next, we would convert the value in pounds to stone:

14 pounds = 1 stone.

112.2 pounds = X stone.

Cross-multiplying, we have:

[tex]14X = 112.2\\\\X=\frac{112.2}{14}[/tex]

X = 8.01 ≈ 8.0 stone.

Read more on weight here: brainly.com/question/13833323

Answer:

1.9375.

Step-by-step explanation:

To solve this, we must use PEMDAS.

The first things we take care of are parentheses and exponents.

Since there are no parentheses, we do exponents.

4^-1+8^-1÷1/2/3^3​

= [tex]\frac{1}{4} +\frac{1}{8} / 1/ 2/ 27[/tex]

= 1/4 + (1/8) / 1 * (27 / 2)

= 1/4 + (27 / 8) / 2

= 1/4 + (27 / 8) * (1 / 2)

= 1/4 + (27 / 16)

= 4 / 16 + 27 / 16

= 31 / 16

= 1.9375.

Hope this helps!

Answer: C. 3.68

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that;

Sample size n = 18

degree of freedom for numerator k = 2

degree of freedom for denominator = n - k - 1 = (18-2-1) = 15

level of significance = 5% = 5/100 = 0.05

From the table values,

the critical value of F at 0.05 significance level with (2, 18) degrees of freedom is 3.68

Therefore option C. 3.68 is the correct answer

Answer: 1. [tex]-\dfrac{5}{6}[/tex]  2. [tex]-\dfrac{1}{3}[/tex] . 3. [tex]-3[/tex]

Step-by-step explanation:

Formula: Slope[tex]=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

1. (-2,2) (3,-3)

Slope [tex]=\dfrac{-3-2}{3-(-2)}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{-5}{3+2}\\\\=\dfrac{-5}{6}[/tex]

Hence, slope of line passing through  (-2,2) (3,-3) is [tex]-\dfrac{5}{6}[/tex] .

2. (-5,1) (4,-2)

Slope [tex]=\dfrac{-2-1}{4-(-5)}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{-3}{4+5}\\\\=\dfrac{-3}{9}\\\\=-\dfrac{1}{3}[/tex]

Hence, slope of line passing through  (-2,2) and (3,-3) is [tex]-\dfrac{1}{3}[/tex] .

3. (-1,5) (2,-4)

Slope [tex]=\dfrac{-4-5}{2-(-1)}[/tex]

[tex]=\dfrac{-9}{2+1}\\\\=\dfrac{-9}{3}\\\\=-3[/tex]

Hence, slope of line passing through (-1,5) and (2,-4) is -3.

Answer:

The probability that no more than 70% would prefer to start their own business is 0.1423.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a Gallup survey indicated that 72% of 18- to 29-year-olds, if given choice, would prefer to start their own business rather than work for someone else.

Let [tex]\hat p[/tex] = sample proportion of people who prefer to start their own business

The z-score probability distribution for the sample proportion is given by;

                               Z  =  [tex]\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex]  ~ N(0,1)

where, p = population proportion who would prefer to start their own business = 72%

            n = sample of 18-29 year-olds = 600

Now, the probability that no more than 70% would prefer to start their own business is given by = P( [tex]\hat p[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] 70%)

       P( [tex]\hat p[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] 70%) = P( [tex]\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\frac{0.70-0.72}{\sqrt{\frac{0.70(1-0.70)}{600} } }[/tex] ) = P(Z [tex]\leq[/tex] -1.07) = 1 - P(Z < 1.07)

                                                                       = 1 - 0.8577 = 0.1423

The above probability is calculated by looking at the value of x = 1.07 in the z table which has an area of 0.8577.

Complete Question

If w'(t) is the rate of growth of a child in pounds per year, what does

[tex]\int\limits^{7}_{4} {w'(t)} \, dt[/tex]  represent?

a) The change in the child's weight (in pounds) between the ages of 4 and 7.

b) The change in the child's age (in years) between the ages of 4 and 7.

c) The child's weight at age 7.

d) The child's weight at age 4. The child's initial weight at birth.

Answer:

The correct option is  option a

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

       [tex]w'(t)[/tex] represents the rate of growth of a child in   [tex]\frac{pounds}{year}[/tex]

So      [tex]{w'(t)} \, dt[/tex]  will be in  [tex]pounds[/tex]

Which then mean that this  [tex]\int\limits^{7}_{4} {w'(t)} \, dt[/tex]  the change in the weight of the child between the ages of  [tex]4 \to 7[/tex] years

Answer:

Following are the answer to this question:

Step-by-step explanation:

The principle vale of Arg(3)

[tex]Arg(3)=-\pi+\tan^{-1} (\frac{|Y|}{|x|})[/tex]

The principle value of the [tex]\logi= \log(0+i)\ \ \ \ \ _{where} \ \ \ x=0 \ \ y=1> 0[/tex]

So, the principle value:

a)

[tex]\to \log(i)=\log |i|+i Arg(i)\\\\[/tex]

             [tex]=\log \sqrt{0+1}+i \tan^{-1}(\frac{1}{0})\\\=\log 1 +i \tan^{-1}(\infty)\\\=0+i\frac{\pi}{2}\\\=i\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]

b)

[tex]\to \log(-i)= \log(0-i ) \ \ \ x=0 \ \ \ y= -1<0\\[/tex]

Principle value:

[tex]\to \log(-i)= \log|-i|+iArg(-i) \\\\[/tex]

                 [tex]=\log \sqrt{0+1}+i(-\pi+\tan^{-1}(\infty))\\\\=\log1 + i(-\pi+\frac{\pi}{2})\\\\=-i\frac{\pi}{2}[/tex]

c)

[tex]\to \log(-1+i) \ \ \ \ x=-1, _{and} y=1 \ \ \ x<0 and y>0[/tex]

The principle value:

[tex]\to \log(-1+i)=\log |-1+i| + i Arg(-1+i)[/tex]

                     [tex]=\log \sqrt{1+1}+i(\pi+\tan^{-1}(\frac{1}{1}))\\\\=\log \sqrt{2} + i(\pi-\tan^{-1}\frac{\pi}{4})\\\\=\log \sqrt{2} + i\tan^{-1}\frac{3\pi}{4}\\\\[/tex]

d)

[tex]\to i^i=w\\\\w=e^{i\log i}[/tex]

The principle value:

[tex]\to \log i=i\frac{\pi}{2}\\\\\to w=e^{i(i \frac{\pi}{2})}\\\\=e^{-\frac{\pi}{2}}[/tex]

e)

[tex]\to (-i)^i\\\to w=(-i)^i\\\\w=e^{i \log (-i)}[/tex]

In this we calculate the principle value from b:

so, the final value is [tex]e^{\frac{\pi}{2}}[/tex]

f)

[tex]\to -1^i\\\\\to w=e^{i log(-1)}\\\\\ principle \ value: \\\\\to \log(-1)= \log |-1|+iArg(-i)[/tex]

                [tex]=\log \sqrt{1} + i(\pi-\tan^{-1}\frac{0}{-1})\\\\=\log \sqrt{1} + i(\pi-0)\\\\=\log \sqrt{1} + i\pi\\\\=0+i\pi\\=i\pi[/tex]

and the principle value of w is = [tex]e^{\pi}[/tex]

g)

[tex]\to -1^{-i}\\\\\to w=e^(-i \log (-1))\\\\[/tex]

from the point f the principle value is:

[tex]\to \log(-1)= i\pi\\\to w= e^{-i(i\pi)}\\\\\to w=e^{\pi}[/tex]

h)

[tex]\to \log(-1-i)\\\\\ Here x=-1 ,<0 \ \ y=-1<0\\\\ \ principle \ value \ is:\\\\ \to \log(-1-i)=\log\sqrt{1+1}+i(-\pi+\tan^{-1}(1))[/tex]

                    [tex]=\log\sqrt{2}+i(-\pi+\frac{\pi}{4})\\\\=\log\sqrt{2}+i(-\frac{3\pi}{4})\\\\=\log\sqrt{2}-i\frac{3\pi}{4})\\[/tex]

Answer:

-12,-10,-3,-1.4,-1,0.25,2,5.2,12

Step-by-step explanation:

The following number −1.4; 2; −3 1 2 ; −1; − 1 2 ; 0.25; −10; 5.2 in increasing order

-12,-10,-3,-1.4,-1,0.25,2,5.2,12

It's arranged this way starting from the negative sign because positive it's greater than negative and if the negative gets to approach zero it's get smaller

Answer:

-10 ; -3 1/2 ; -1.4 ; -1 ; -1/2 ; 0.25 ; 2 ; 5.2

Answer:

8lb of the cheaper Candy

17.5lb of the expensive candy

Step-by-step explanation:

Let the cheaper candy be x

let the costly candy be y

X+y = 25.5....equation one

2.2x +7.3y = 25.5(5.7)

2.2x +7.3y = 145.35.....equation two

X+y = 25.5

2.2x +7.3y = 145.35

Solving simultaneously

X= 25.5-y

Substituting value of X into equation two

2.2(25.5-y) + 7.3y = 145.35

56.1 -2.2y +7.3y = 145.35

5.1y = 145.35-56.1

5.1y = 89.25

Y= 89.25/5.1

Y= 17.5

X= 25.5-y

X= 25.5-17.5

X= 8

Answer:

(a) The probability of getting someone who was not sent to prison is 0.55.

(b) If a study subject is randomly selected and it is then found that the subject entered a guilty plea, the probability that this person was not sent to prison is 0.63.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that in a study of pleas and prison sentences, it is found that 45% of the subjects studied were sent to prison. Among those sent to prison, 40% chose to plead guilty. Among those not sent to prison, 55% chose to plead guilty.

Let the probability that subjects studied were sent to prison = P(A) = 0.45

Let G = event that subject chose to plead guilty

So, the probability that the subjects chose to plead guilty given that they were sent to prison = P(G/A) = 0.40

and the probability that the subjects chose to plead guilty given that they were not sent to prison = P(G/A') = 0.55

(a) The probability of getting someone who was not sent to prison = 1 - Probability of getting someone who was sent to prison

      P(A') = 1 - P(A)

               = 1 - 0.45 = 0.55

(b) If a study subject is randomly selected and it is then found that the subject entered a guilty plea, the probability that this person was not sent to prison is given by = P(A'/G)

We will use Bayes' Theorem here to calculate the above probability;

    P(A'/G) =  [tex]\frac{P(A') \times P(G/A')}{P(A') \times P(G/A') +P(A) \times P(G/A)}[/tex]      

                 =  [tex]\frac{0.55 \times 0.55}{0.55\times 0.55 +0.45 \times 0.40}[/tex]

                 =  [tex]\frac{0.3025}{0.4825}[/tex]

                 =  0.63

Answer:

7y⁴- 10yz - y²z - 5

Step-by-step explanation:

First collect like terms

3y²+ 4y²- 6yz - 4yz - y²z - 7+2

7y⁴-10yz - y²z - 5

Answer:

Its C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula of a slope:

[tex]m=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

We have the points

[tex](3;\ 9)\to x_1=3;\ y_1=9\\(1;\ 1)\to x_2=1;\ y_2=1[/tex]

Substitute:

[tex]m=\dfrac{1-9}{1-3}=\dfrac{-8}{-2}=4[/tex]

Answer:

m=4

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope can be found using the following formula:

[tex]m=\frac{y_{2} -y_{1} }{x_{2} -x_{1} }[/tex]

where [tex](x_{1},y_{1})[/tex] and [tex](x_{2},y_{2})[/tex] are points on the line.

We are given the points (3,9) and (1,1). Therefore,

[tex]x_{1}=3\\y_{1}=9 \\x_{2}=1\\y_{2}=1[/tex]

Substitute each value into the formula.

[tex]m=\frac{1-9}{1-3}[/tex]

Subtract in the numerator first.

[tex]m=\frac{-8}{1-3}[/tex]

Subtract in the denominator.

[tex]m=\frac{-8}{-2}[/tex]

Divide.

[tex]m=4[/tex]

The slope of the line is 4.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The average salary in this city is $45,600.

Using the formula

z score = x - u /(sd/√n)

Where x is 46,356, u is 45,600 sd is 15,930 and n is 53.

z = 46,356 - 45600 / (15930/√53)

z = 756/(15930/7.2801)

z = 756/(2188.1568)

z = 0.3455

To draw a conclusion, we have to determine the p value, at 0.05 level of significance for a two tailed test, the p value is 0.7297. The p value is higher than the significance level, thus we will fail to reject the null and can conclude that there is not enough statistical evidence to prove that the average is any different for single people.

Answer:

2 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

x= smallest

3x=largest

2x=medium

x+3x+2x=12

6x=12

x=2

so smallest is 2

largest is 6 (3x)

medium is 4 (2x)

2+6+4=12

Answer:

0.0668 or 6.68%

Step-by-step explanation:

Variance (V) = 10,000

Standard deviation (σ) = √V= 100

Mean score (μ) = 500

The z-score for any test score X is:

[tex]z=\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

For X = 650:

[tex]z=\frac{650-500}{100}\\z=1.5[/tex]

A z-score of 1.5 is equivalent to the 93.32nd percentile of a normal distribution. Therefore, the probability that he or she will make a score of 650 or more is:

[tex]P(X\geq 650)=1-P(X\leq 650)\\P(X\geq 650)=1-0.9332\\P(X\geq 650)=0.0668=6.68\%[/tex]

The probability is 0.0668 or 6.68%

The probability that he or she will make a score of 650 or more is 0.0668.

Let X = Scores made on a certain aptitude test by nursing students

X follows normal distribution with mean = 500 and variance of 10,000.

So, standard deviation = [tex]\sqrt{10000}=100[/tex].

z score of 650 is = [tex]\frac{\left(650-500\right)}{100}=1.5[/tex].

The probability that he or she will make a score of 650 or more is:

[tex]P(X\geq 650)\\=P(z\geq 1.5)\\=1-P(z<1.5)\\=1-0.9332\\=0.0668[/tex]

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/14109853

Answer: 0.9964

Step-by-step explanation:

Consider,

P (disk failure) = 0.06

q = 0.06

p = 1- q

p = 1- 0.06,

p = 0.94

Step 2

Whereas p represents the probability that a disk does not fail. (i.e. working entire year).

a)

Step 3

a)

n = 2,

let x be a random variable for number...

Continuation in the attached document

Answer: 680

Step-by-step explanation:

When order doesn't matter,then the number of combinations of choosing r things out of n = [tex]^nC_r=\dfrac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}[/tex]

Given: Total participants = 17

From these, a group of 3 participants is to be tested under a special condition.

Number of groups of 3 participants chosen = [tex]^{17}C_3=\dfrac{17!}{3!(17-3)!}\[/tex]

[tex]^{17}C_3=\dfrac{17!}{3!(17-3)!}\\\\=\dfrac{17\times16\times15\times14!}{3\times2\times14!}\\\\=680[/tex]

Hence, there are 680 groups of 3 participants can  be chosen,.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The happiest used in a test in statistics are the null and the alternative hypothesis. The null hypothesis is usually the default statement while the alternative hypothesis is thevopposite of the null hypothesis.

In this case study, the null hypothesis is u1 = u2: the average mean time it takes to accelerate to 30 miles per hour for car 1 is the same as that for car 2.

The alternative hypothesis is u1 > u2: the mean time it takes to accelerate to 30 miles per hour is greater than that for car 2 thus car 1 is slower to accelerate as it takes more time.

Answer:

i think (d) one i think it will help you