Answer:
The answer is A because the answer is eye witnesses
Every broker must have a written office policy concerning _____ .
employee vacation policy.
brokerage relationships offered to the public.
commissions and fees charged to the public.
fair housing.
Answer:
commissions and fees charged to the public.
Explanation:
A broker is someone who is into the trading of business stocks or options in-order to maximize profits either for themselves or for the business entities which they represent.
In-order to have a successful relationship, there is need for their terms and conditions associated with the stock or option trading to be known and clear to their customers. These can only be achieved through having office policy document where their commissions and fees charged are explicitly stated for the public.
There are endless consequences of being an "inmate," "prisoner," "convict," etc. Pick what you consider to be the 3 biggest problems for these individuals when they leave incarceration and return to their communities.
check the items which are included as an expense for transportation
1. electricity
2. location
3. license and registration
4. insurance
5.monthly payment
6. maintenance
7. fuel
Two neighbors who live on an army base have a dispute that involves one of the neighbors accusing the other of breaking a law.
Which court would handle this dispute?
А.
Civil Court
В.
Military Court
C
Criminal Court
D
Constitutional Court
Answer:
It would be C; Criminal Court.
Explanation:
Criminal Court cases are designed to determine whether a person has violated the law. So yeah. Hope this helps. If it doesn't, tell me.
DUE TODAY!!! PLEASE HELP!!!
Compare and contrast Justice Breyer and Justice O'Connor's remarks on Judicial Activism. What examples did they provide? What were their concerns?
Answer:
Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor encouraged her staff to enjoy whitewater rafting, Mexican take-out brunch and tours of the Smithsonian. Justice Stephen Breyer loves to read French manuscripts and cultivated his distaste for footnotes during his clerkship to Arthur Goldberg. Such details were plentiful as Professor John Feerick introduced Justice O'Connor and her former colleague Justice Breyer to a well-heeled audience of lawyers and law students at Fordham Law School yesterday morning.
The two justices, and co-hosts of the day's symposium, sat together at a small table for their introductory panel, "Judicial Independence and Impartiality." Sandra Day O'Connor, dressed in a violet suit with gold buttons, her blonde hair now a shock of snowy white, frowned as she tried to twist the top off her water bottle, then leaned over towards Breyer and held it out to him. He wordlessly took it, unscrewed the top, and handed it back.
Sally Rider, Director of the William Rehnquist Center at the University of Arizona, kicked things off with a series of questions. Why, she asked O'Connor, did she decide to convene this conference on judicial independence in the first place?
O'Connor said she remembered seeing "Impeach Earl Warren" signs in New Mexico and Arizona when she was growing up, and said that in her final years on the Supreme Court, attacks on judges increased, including proposals for mass impeachments of judges involved in the Terri Schiavo case, or proposals to cut judicial terms short, or a particularly disconcerting movement towards "Jail4Judges," a campaign to allow citizen panels to review rulings from the bench, with the ability to even imprison—as the name tantalizingly implies—those who made bad decisions. These developments were "very depressing," she said, and so she decided to use her retirement to call attention to these attacks on judges.
"An independent judiciary is an essential bedrock principle, and we're losing it." The reason was in part the fact that civics and government are not a requirement for high school graduation. "One third of Americans can't name the three branches of government, but two thirds can name a judge on American Idol!"
Money has been pouring in to state judicial elections in recent years, including races for State Supreme Court justices. A 2004 campaign for a seat on the Illinois Supreme Court brought in a record-setting $9.3 million in political contributions, including hundreds of thousands of dollars from State Farm, a company with a case pending before the court. And just recently, Wisconsin voters were subjected to over 11,000 televised campaign ads in the weeks before their state's Supreme Court race, over ninety percent of which were purchased by special interest groups (racking up a bill of well over 3.6 million dollars). Said O'Connor, "We put cash in the courtrooms, and it's just wrong." She then pointed to the room of lawyers and students. "You should take this seriously." (A later panel backed up O'Connor's concerns. New York Times legal correspondent Adam Liptak, Brennan Center attorney James Sample and Professor Michael Dimino discussed evidence that judges tend to rule in favor of their campaign contributors.)
She went on. "No other nation in the world elects judges." She pointed to Georgina Woods, the chief justice of Ghana, sitting in the front row, as if to illustrate her point.
"Why are we tolerating this? What are we going to do about it?" Then, seeming to remember that the initial question posed to her several minutes before was "why did you convene this conference," she added, "That's why," and sat back in her chair. The audience laughed and applauded.
Breyer took the floor next. Keeping state courts impartial is a major issue, but try talking about it with people "and they're asleep after five minutes." He recounted a trip to Russia he had made when serving as an appellate judge for the First Circuit after he was appointed by Carter. Meeting with Russian judges from across the country, he was surprised to hear their accounts of "telephone justice," when the party boss calls and tells judges which way to vote. "They asked me, ‘do you have telephone justice in the United States,' and I had to explain to them that no, the President wouldn't call you. He'd be crazy to do that."
Explanation:
?????? anyone know this?
Why is constitution fundamental law of the land
Explanation:
The law is important for a society for it serves as a norm of conduct for citizens. It was also made to provide for proper guidelines and order upon the behaviour for all citizens and to sustain the equity on the three branches of the government. It keeps the society running. Without law there would be chaos and it would be survival of the fittest and everyman for himself. Not an ideal lifestyle for most part.
The law is important because it acts as a guideline as to what is accepted in society. Without it there would be conflicts between social groups and communities. It is pivotal that we follow them. The law allows for easy adoption to changes that occur in the society.
Answer:
One of the major innovations that the American Founders brought to constitutional thought was their conception of a constitution as a written, fundamental law the supreme “law of the land” that defines the organization of government and serves as the ruling principle for the proper exercise of power by legislators
Explanation:
According to the text, the establishment of the American Law Institute (ALI) was a result of
Officer Belkin patrols an area known to have a lot of illegal
drug activity on the streets and a number of "crack" houses
(places where crack cocaine is sold illegally).
Belkin sees Clarice standing on a corner and begins to walk
toward her, intending to try and ask her questions. Clarice
sees Belkin coming toward her and takes off running. Belkin
yells for Clarice to "Stop right there!" and Clarice does so.
Belkin then approaches Clarice and frisks her for weapons.
During the frisk, Belkin feels a knife and when he retrieves
the knife, a package of heroin feel from where Clarice had it
stashed in the waistband of her pants.
A)The drugs will not be admissible because they were discovered
during an illegal search
B)The drugs will be admissible because they fell to the ground on
their own when the officer legally frisked Clarice for weapons,
C)The drugs will not be admissible because the frisk was for
weapons, not for drugs
D)The drugs will be admissible at trial because they were
discovered during a frisk and anything found during a stop and
frisk is admissible.
Answer:
B.
Explanation:
In a paragraph compare and contrast offenders’ rights prior to the 1960s and after the 1960s.
Answer:
You should find the diffrences betwwen each top then compare and contrast
Explanation:
Question 1
If you were driving the blue Prius in the situation pictured above, explain why the red Mustang should be given
right-of-way at this intersection,
Answer: because the mustang is on the right so they have the right away
Explanation:
Answer:
The mustang has the right of way because they got the the stop sign first
Explanation:
Men are important change agents in policing, and they will be integral to bringing about an essential shift in policing culture.
True or false?
Answer:
Men are important change agents in policing, and they will be integral to bringing about an essential shift in policing culture.
Explanation:
is true
Men are important change agents in policing, and they will be integral to bringing about an essential shift in policing culture. This statement is true. Thus, option (a) is correct.
What is culture?
A society's complete way of life, including its language, religion, customs, and fashion sense, is referred to as its “culture.” Many geographic factors affect the culture. Communication includes the culture. Culture refers to the tangible and intangible objects that people make.
According to the statement are the given, the men are the significant to the variation of the agents into the policing are there will be to bring about on essential shift are the policing to the culture. There was on the based are the essential of the shift are the policing are the changes in the culture.
As a result, the men are significant change agents in policing, and they will be integral to bringing about an essential shift in policing culture. This, statement is true. Thus, option (a) is correct.
Learn more about on culture, here:
https://brainly.com/question/12678729
#SPJ2
Officer Belkin stopped Stephen on the street after observing
him engaged in what appeared to be the sale of illegal
narcotic drugs. The officer observed the typical behavior that
takes place when someone asks if drugs are available and
when drugs and cash are exchanged, although the officer did
not see any actual drugs exchanged. When asked what he
was doing, Stephen replied, "just chillin'."
Assume that the initial stop of Stephen by Belkin was valid.
Which one of the following may Officer Belkin do with
regards to a search of Stephen?
A)Belkin can conduct a full search of Stephen
B)Belkin cannot frisk or fully search Stephen because he does not
have probable cause
C)Belkin can frisk Stephen, looking for drugs
D)Belkin can frisk Stephen, looking for weapons
Answer:
The answer is B.
Explanation:
URGENT 50 POINTS
While going over a case post-trial, a defense attorney realizes that he made a costly error that could have meant the difference between a guilty and non-guilty verdict for his client. It seems that he did not adequately argue the key points of the case and attempt to help the jury put the pieces of the puzzle together in order to come to a verdict. Which area might the attorney focus on while preparing for future trials?
A.
closing arguments
B.
opening statements
C.
cross examination
D.
direct examination
Answer:
b because it makes most sense
Explanation
Is it possible to
have an impartial jury with the attention media pays to important/large cases?
50 points Federal firefighters who are responsible for tackling fires in building are called ______ firefighters
Answer:
firemen
Explanation:
I hope I helped you
Police have been investigating Irvin for several months. They
suspect he has been collecting workers compensation
benefits by lying about his injuries. The police have collected
substantial amounts of evidence against Irvin, including
videotapes of his playing golf and copies of the benefits
applications he has completed. Believing they have probable
cause, police go to Irvin's house. When Irvin answers the
door, the police tell him "We do not have a warrant, but we
are prepared to go and get one. We've been watching you
and we know you have been lying about your injuries. If you
don't let us come in and search your house we will go get a
warrant and come back Irvin consents and lets the police
search his house and the police find more evidence against
Irvin.
A)The evidence should beadmitted because Irvin consented to the
search
B)The evidence should be excluded because they did not tell Irvin
what they were looking for.
C)The evidence found by the police should be excluded because
the police did not have a warrant.
D)The evidence should be admitted because Irvin might be lying
Answer: C
Explanation:
5. Why do states with similar crime rates sometimes have different incarceration rates?
Answer:
Similar case or crime happened in different states they charged different incarceration rates because each state has different legislation and jurisdiction. The different states have different ways of handling crimes and keep people in prison for different length of time.
Hope it helps
Please mark me as the brainliest
Thank you
Describe a potential conflict situation in a criminal justice setting. suggest possible ways this conflict could be managed. also, describe what you believe the role of a criminal justice administrator should be in such a situation, and why?
Answer:
thevf vsffe veyrj rbe
Explanation:
Studies indicate that individuals who consume ______
are at a greater risk of victimization.
Answer:
junk foods
Explanation: