Answer:
Correct order of events is:
Greeks invented democracy
Height of the Roman empire
Middle ages in Europe
Renaissance
Industrial revolution
WWII
Explanation:
Ancient Greece is the cradle of democracy, and in the city-state of Athens in the 6th Century BC democracy developed. Roman Empire was at the peak of its strength during 2nd Century, when Trajan and Hadrian were ruling.
Middle Ages are usually dated from 476 until 1492, while Renaissance was a movement that continued on the Middle Ages. First industrial revolution started in 18th Century, while WW2 was led between 1939 and 1945.
Catholics do not believe in the teaching sola Schipluid
Select one:
They believe only the Pope is the infallible authority for the Christian faith.
they believe it is not biblically or historically correct
Catholics don't believe in reading the bible.
They're still mad at Martin Luther
Answer:
B I think
Explanation:
sorry if it isn't correct
Issues concerning which of these areas poses the greatest obstacle to Israeli-Palestinian peace?
A. West Bank and Gaza
B. Jordan and Lebanon
C. Syria and Jordan
D. Golan Heights and the Jordan River
Answer:c
Explanation:
The following question is based on your reading of “Heart of Darkness” by Joseph Conrad.
What does Marlow need to repair his wrecked steamer?
a.
Steel plates
c.
Tools
b.
A new boiler
d.
Rivets
Please select the best answer from the choices provided
Answer:
D) Rivets
Hope this helped :)
Explain why the phrase “the laws of natures and nature’s God” was included in the Declaration of Independence.
Answer:
Explanation: Quick explanation. The "laws of nature and of nature's God" entitle the United States to independence. Men are "endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable rights." And the Declaration of Independence contains a theological teaching because the ultimate source of our rights and duties is God.
Please help fast! these questions are on the Mystery of the Horse Creek Girl video
1. What old stories from 1880-1890 coincided with the time period that this malnourished girl would have lived? Conversely, what contrast exists between recorded history of the time and this new evidence from the remains?
2. In order to tell the girl’s story, what did the team make a replica of? What tribe did Eli and the team ultimately decide the girl was from and how did they come to this conclusion?
3. Do you think the work that Eli did on this project was valuable? Explain your reasons why/why not.
Answer:
I only have these so far, please dont copy word for word k.
Explanation:
Discuss the challenge Eli come across as he began his investigation. What item did he use as a starting point?---- They didn't have any historical records from her discovery , or any of the initial coroners reports. They used moccasins that were found on the human remains to use as a starting point.
What did the string on the moccasins tell Eli about the time period?--- The string is cotton, not sinew so that helps to date the moccasins. If they were pre-reservation the string would most likely be sinew.
Once Eli moved on to examine the remains themselves, what marks did he decide to investigate further and what clues did the marks uncover? After these clues, explain how the investigation shifted for Eli and why the shift was significant. Eli went to get her teeth examined and analyzed by a professional because they noticed that she had hypoplasia marks on some of her teeth. The analysis showed that she had gotten very sick with something like a viral infection or fever when she was 3 or 4 years old. They also showed that she had a fairly rough diet, and was in her early 20s when she died.
After reviewing several stimulus projects, a senator decides which ones to put on a list of projects of which he disapproves.?
Answer:
He must disapprove of those who do not comply with the constitution and laws in force in the country.
Explanation:
A senator must disapprove of any project that is not in accordance with the constitution and laws in force in the country. This is because senators must respect the laws and not evaluate the projects according to their own convictions, but according to the legislative structure that makes up the territory where it is established. For this reason, projects must be thoroughly analyzed and revised, so as not to run into any laws.
As part of the blueprint for checks and balances, the United States Constitution outlines a procedure for Congress to impeach and remove public officials, including the president of the United States. Develop an argument on whether the congressional procedure outlined in the Constitution for impeachment and removal is an effective check on the president, too weak a check on the president, or too strong a check on the president.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
It is true that as part of the blueprint for checks and balances, the United States Constitution outlines a procedure for Congress to impeach and remove public officials, including the president of the United States.
Thus procedure outlined in the Constitution for impeachment and removal is an effective check on the president but according to history, it has only been needed three times in US history.
The first, with the impeachment of President Andrew Johnson. The second one, the impeachment of President Bill Clinton, and the third one, the impeachment of President Donald Trump. Well, we can add a fourth one right now, when Democrats want to impeach Trump for the second time.
The thing is that the legislative branch has this powerful tool as part of the system of checks and balances, however, as it is only needed when the president has been accused of high crimes or treason, it has just been used few times by the US Congress.
The impeachment process is the official mechanism to remove the President of the United States, the vice president or other government officials that are suspected of having committed any high crime, treason, or misconduct. If the House of Representatives approves by sole majority articles of impeachment, the matter is presented to the Senate. The Constitution provides the Senate with the sole power to try an impeachment process.
The correct opinion will be that the congressional procedure for in the United States Constitution impeachment is too weak a check on the President of the United States of America.
The senators have the supreme authority to keep a check on the performances of various public officials serving different departments, including the President.
Congressional proceduresThe congressional procedure of the Constitution is not an effective for keeping a check on President by the senators as majority of the senators are under the influence of President. The President is a powerful person in the country and can manipulate the procedures that are conducted in the results of the procedure.Hence, due to such undue influence of President over the Congress and the senators, the procedures of the constitution are not an effective tool to keep a check on the performance of the President.
Learn more about the Congressional procedures here:
https://brainly.com/question/10584228
Pls help I will give u brain master
Answer:
pliers
Explanation:
giving the rest of my points, comment sum random