Sally is solving the linear equation 13 + 4x - 9 = 7x + 7 - 3x. Her final two steps are:
4 + 4x = 4x + 7
4 = 7
Select the statement that correctly interprets Sally's solution.
Lesson Link
1 The solution is x = 0.
2 The solution is the ordered pair (4,7).
3 There is no solution since 4 = 7 is a false statement.
4 There are infinitely many solutions since 4 = 7 is a false statement.
a
Enter the answer number!

Answer:

A. He charges 75 dollars for the service call because the y-intercept of the equation is 75.

B. He charges 50 dollars per hour because the slope of the equation is 50.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

y=-3x-14

Step-by-step explanation:

y=mx +c

m= 1/3

perp m= -3

goes through point (6,-4)

sub numbers

Answer:

..........uh ok but u do know that u need to answer questions and get points to talk to users....right..?

Answer:

look it up i need my coins

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

The second bag is the better deal

Step-by-step explanation:

8÷2.56= $3.13 per potato

10÷ 4.32= $2.31 per potato

Step-by-step explanation:

72 apples.

38 red, and therefore 72-38 = 34 green.

46 have worms, therefore 72-46 = 26 have not.

and so, in the best case you have 26 green apples without worms.

Answer:

Third option: (0,-5) and (-4,3)

Step-by-step explanation:

x^2 + y^2 = 25

2x + y = -5

y = -5 - 2x

x^2 + (-5-2x)^2 = 25

x^2 + 25 + 20x + 4x^2 = 25

5x^2 + 20x + 25 = 25

5x^2 + 20x = 0

5x(x+4) = 0

5x=0 --> x=0

x+4=0 --> x=-4

2(-4) + y = -5

-8 + y = -5

y = 3 --> (-4,3)

2(0) + y = -5

0 + y = -5

y = -5 --> (0,-5)

Therefore, the solutions to the system of equations are (0,-5) and (-4,3)

Answer:

Perpendicular Bisectors

Step-by-step explanation:

Recall that a perpendicular bisector intersects a line segment at its midpoint and is perpendicular.

Answer: The point-slope form is: y - 1 = 2(x + 2). Therefore, the answer is B.

========================================================

Explanation:

We're given f(1) = 3.2 which says the first term of the sequence is 3.2

To find the second term, we use the other equation, which is the recursive equation. Plug in x = 1 to get...

f(x+1) = 2.5*f(x)

f(1+1) = 2.5*f(1)

f(2) = 2.5*f(1)

f(2) = 2.5*3.2

f(2) = 8

The second term is 8. We multiplied the previous term (3.2) by the factor 2.5 to get this second term.

The third term is handled pretty much in a similar fashion

third term = 2.5*(second term)

third term = 2.5*8

third term = 20

Lastly, the fourth term f(4) is...

f(x+1) = 2.5*f(x)

f(3+1) = 2.5*f(3)

f(4) = 2.5*f(3)

f(4) = 2.5*20

f(4) = 50

The fourth term is 50.

The first four terms are: 3.2, 8, 20, 50

Answer:

it is not

Step-by-step explanation:

0.33 is rounded off whereas 1/3 would have a continued decimal of 3, i.e. 0.333333333

Answer:

158.4 pieces of brocoli were covered in cheese

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

chicken tender

Step-by-step explanation:

rgerr

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

75%

42/56 =  42/56

Convert to decimal form:

42÷56 = 0.75

= 75%

Can you mark as brainliest if its right?

Answer:

75%

Step-by-step explanation:

42/56 = 0.75 = 75%

Answer:

Need the table, and the statements

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

in short, Yes they are always rational.

here's why...

E.g. suppose [tex]\frac{c}{d}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{a}{b}[/tex] are fractions, that means that a,b,c,d are all integers, and b and d are not zero. finding the sum the numerator, and denominator would also have to be integers. the denominator of the sum can't be zero since the denominators of the fractions were not zero, and would give [tex]\frac{ad+bc}{bd}[/tex] and since they are bound by addition (sum means addition) they must also be rational since eit would equal a bigger integer than initially had

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: C

Look at the graph the lines meet at this point, this is the logical answer

5,3

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Steps to multiply using Long Multiplication

Multiplying 2-Digit by 2-Digit Numbers

Let us multiply 47 by 63 using the long multiplication method.

1. Write the two numbers one below the other as per the places of their digits. Write the bigger number on top and a multiplication sign on the left. Draw a line below the numbers. 



2. Multiply ones digit of the top number by the ones digit of the bottom number.

Write the product as shown.



3. Multiply the tens digit of the top number by the ones digit of the bottom number.



This is our first partial product which we got on multiplying the top number by the ones digit of the bottom number.

4. Write a 0 below the ones digit as shown. This is because we will now be multiplying the digits of the top number by the tens digit of the bottom number. Hence, we write a 0 in the ones place.



5. Multiply the ones digit of the top number by the tens digit of the bottom number.



6. Multiply the tens digit of the top number by the tens digit of the bottom number.



This is the second partial product obtained on multiplying the top number by the tens digit of the bottom number.

7. Add the two partial products.

 

In long multiplication method, the number on the top is called the multiplicand. The number by which it is multiplied, that is, the bottom number is called the multiplier.

So, a long division problem will have:



We follow the same method for multiplying numbers greater than 2-Digits.

The figure below shows the long division method to multiply 357 by 23

Answer:

so sorry i don't know the answer

[tex]\left \{ {-3x-2y = -6} \atop {-3x+2y=18} \right. <=>\left \{ {-6x=12} \atop {-3x+2y=18} \right. <=> \left \{ {x=-2} \atop {y=6} \right.[/tex]

The answer: ( x ; y ) = ( -2 ; 6 )

Ok done. Thank to me :>

Answer:

elaboration

Step-by-step explanation:

tthe definition of elaboration is the addition of more detail concerning what has already been said. so out of these options, elaboration best fits answers the question

Answer:

14

Step-by-step explanation:

Percentage increase =

2% × 700 =

2 ÷ 100 × 700 =

2 × 700 ÷ 100 =

1,400 ÷ 100 =

14

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

In order to use a percent in the math work, it must be changed to a decimal, so instead if 2% use .02

700 × .02 = 14

14 is the amount of the increase, so it must be added onto the strarting amount.

700 + 14 = 714

A different way to do this is to say the new amount will be all of the original amount (100%) and also the increase (2%) So in just one step we can calculate th new amount

700 × 1.02 = 714

714 is the price now.

Discounts are used to reduce the original price of an item.

David will pay $25 and 92 cents for an item of $32, before tax

The discount (d) is given as:

[tex]d =19\%[/tex]

The price (p) of the item is given as:

[tex]p = \$32[/tex]

So, the amount (A) paid before tax is calculated using:

[tex]A = p \times (1 - d)[/tex]

Substitute known values

[tex]A = \$32 \times (1 - 19\%)[/tex]

Express percentage as decimal

[tex]A = \$32 \times (1 - 0.19)[/tex]

Subtract 0.19 from 1

[tex]A = \$32 \times 0.81[/tex]

Multiply 32 and 0.81

[tex]A = \$25.92[/tex]

Hence, David will pay $25 and 92 cents for an item of $32, before tax

Read more about discounts at:

https://brainly.com/question/11538623

Answer:

It is too garlicky.

Step-by-step explanation:

lol, uhm, this is a little bit of a strange question ngl, but I guess it's testing you on measurements and units, right?

Well, 12 gloves of garlic for every 900 mL of sauce in comparison to 8 cloves of garlic for every 500 mL of sauce is quite a difference to be honest, might even be too much in her opinion. 8 cloves for every 500 mL is more than 12 cloves for every 900 mL, so I'd say she'll think it's too garlicy.

I apologize, in advance, if I am incorrect.