Shawna spent half of her weekly allowance playing arcade games. To earn more money her parents let her clean the windows in the house for $4.37. What is her weekly allowance if she ended with $11.18?

Answer:

2 inches

Step-by-step explanation:

x= smallest

3x=largest

2x=medium

x+3x+2x=12

6x=12

x=2

so smallest is 2

largest is 6 (3x)

medium is 4 (2x)

2+6+4=12

Answer:

Option C

Step-by-step explanation:

The whole numbers a,b and c such that [tex]a^2+b^2 = c^2[/tex] are Pythagorean triples satisfying the Pythagorean theorem.

Answer:

C

Step-by-step explanation:

a, b, and c are side lengths of the triangle.

The three side lengths that make up a right triangle are most commonly known as Pythagorean triples.

7km/ 4km per hour = 1 3/4 hours

3/4 hour = 45 minutes

Total time = 1 hour and 45 minutes.

Answer:

Null - p= 71%

Alternative - p =/ 71%

Step-by-step explanation:

The null hypothesis is always the default statement in an experiment. While the alternative hypothesis is always tested against the null hypothesis.

Null hypothesis: 71% of their readers own a personal computer- p = 71%

Alternative hypothesis: Not 71% of their readers own a personal computer - p =/ 71%

Answer:

n = 17

Step-by-step explanation:

Assuming

- probability of success (making free throw) does not vary

We have

n = 17 (trials)

p = 0.479

x > 9

The answer is "[tex]\bold{p(x>9)=0.2550319}[/tex]"

[tex]\to X:[/tex] Number of creating free throws in a set [tex]\bold{17\ \ x \sim bin(17,0.479)}[/tex]

Know we calculating the P(makes more than 9 of them)

[tex]=\bold{9(X>9)=1-P(Z<=9)}[/tex]

Using the R-code:

[tex]\to \bold{1-p\ binom(9,17,0.479)}\\\\\to \bold{[1]0.2550319}\\\\\bold{\therefore}\\\\ \to \bold{p(x>9)=0.2550319}[/tex]

Learn more:

binomial distribution: brainly.com/question/9065292

Answer:

B. The fact that two variables are strongly correlated does not in itself imply a​ cause-and-effect relationship between the variables.

Step-by-step explanation:

The term "correlation does not imply causation", simply means that because we can deduce a link between two factors or sets of data, it does not necessarily prove that there is a cause-and-effect relationship between the two variables. In some cases, there could indeed be a cause-and-effect relationship but it cannot be said for certain that this would always be the case.

While correlation shows the linear relationship between two things, causation implies that an event occurs because of another event. So the phrase is actually saying that because two factors are related, it does not mean that it is as a result of a causal factor. It could simply be a coincidence. This occurs because of our effort to seek an explanation for the occurrence of certain events.

Answer: B. The fact that two variables are strongly correlated does not in itself imply a​ cause-and-effect relationship between the variables.

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The formula of a slope:

[tex]m=\dfrac{y_2-y_1}{x_2-x_1}[/tex]

We have the points

[tex](3;\ 9)\to x_1=3;\ y_1=9\\(1;\ 1)\to x_2=1;\ y_2=1[/tex]

Substitute:

[tex]m=\dfrac{1-9}{1-3}=\dfrac{-8}{-2}=4[/tex]

Answer:

m=4

Step-by-step explanation:

Slope can be found using the following formula:

[tex]m=\frac{y_{2} -y_{1} }{x_{2} -x_{1} }[/tex]

where [tex](x_{1},y_{1})[/tex] and [tex](x_{2},y_{2})[/tex] are points on the line.

We are given the points (3,9) and (1,1). Therefore,

[tex]x_{1}=3\\y_{1}=9 \\x_{2}=1\\y_{2}=1[/tex]

Substitute each value into the formula.

[tex]m=\frac{1-9}{1-3}[/tex]

Subtract in the numerator first.

[tex]m=\frac{-8}{1-3}[/tex]

Subtract in the denominator.

[tex]m=\frac{-8}{-2}[/tex]

Divide.

[tex]m=4[/tex]

The slope of the line is 4.

Answer:

-12,-10,-3,-1.4,-1,0.25,2,5.2,12

Step-by-step explanation:

The following number −1.4; 2; −3 1 2 ; −1; − 1 2 ; 0.25; −10; 5.2 in increasing order

-12,-10,-3,-1.4,-1,0.25,2,5.2,12

It's arranged this way starting from the negative sign because positive it's greater than negative and if the negative gets to approach zero it's get smaller

Answer:

-10 ; -3 1/2 ; -1.4 ; -1 ; -1/2 ; 0.25 ; 2 ; 5.2

the bag is 200g

total weight with oranges is 1400g

deduct the bags weight from total weight

1400 - 200

1200g

this is the weight of the three oranges

so each orange would be

1200 ÷ 3

400g

Answer:

a. p`± z₀.₀₂₅[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{p`q`}{n}[/tex]  

b.0.6 ±  1.96 [tex]\sqrt \frac{0.6* 0.4}{1000}[/tex]  

c. { -1.96 ≤  p`± z₀.₀₂₅[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{p`q`}{n}[/tex]     ≥ 1.96} = 0.95  

Step-by-step explanation:

Here the total number of trials is n= 1000

The number of successes is p` = 600/1000 = 0.6. The q` is 1 - p`= 1- 0.6 = 0.4

The degree of confidence is 95 %  therefore z₀.₀₂₅ = 1.96 ( α/2 = 0.025)

a.  The formula used will be

p`± z₀.₀₂₅[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{p`q`}{n}[/tex]       ( z with the base alpha by 2 (α/2 = 0.025))

b. Putting the values

0.6 ±  1.96 [tex]\sqrt \frac{0.6* 0.4}{1000}[/tex]  

c. Confidence Interval in Interval Notation.

{ -1.96 ≤  p`± z₀.₀₂₅[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{p`q`}{n}[/tex]     ≥ 1.96} = 0.95  

{ -z( base alpha by 2) ≤  p`± z₀.₀₂₅[tex]\sqrt{ \frac{p`q`}{n}[/tex]     ≥ z( base alpha by 2)  } = 1- α

Answer:

7y⁴- 10yz - y²z - 5

Step-by-step explanation:

First collect like terms

3y²+ 4y²- 6yz - 4yz - y²z - 7+2

7y⁴-10yz - y²z - 5

Answer:

Its C

Step-by-step explanation:

Answer: 680

Step-by-step explanation:

When order doesn't matter,then the number of combinations of choosing r things out of n = [tex]^nC_r=\dfrac{n!}{r!(n-r)!}[/tex]

Given: Total participants = 17

From these, a group of 3 participants is to be tested under a special condition.

Number of groups of 3 participants chosen = [tex]^{17}C_3=\dfrac{17!}{3!(17-3)!}\[/tex]

[tex]^{17}C_3=\dfrac{17!}{3!(17-3)!}\\\\=\dfrac{17\times16\times15\times14!}{3\times2\times14!}\\\\=680[/tex]

Hence, there are 680 groups of 3 participants can  be chosen,.

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The average salary in this city is $45,600.

Using the formula

z score = x - u /(sd/√n)

Where x is 46,356, u is 45,600 sd is 15,930 and n is 53.

z = 46,356 - 45600 / (15930/√53)

z = 756/(15930/7.2801)

z = 756/(2188.1568)

z = 0.3455

To draw a conclusion, we have to determine the p value, at 0.05 level of significance for a two tailed test, the p value is 0.7297. The p value is higher than the significance level, thus we will fail to reject the null and can conclude that there is not enough statistical evidence to prove that the average is any different for single people.

Answer:

(0,-2)

Step-by-step explanation:

The y-intercept is simply when the function touches or crosses the y-axis.

We're told that the graph crosses the y-axis at -2. In other words, the y-intercept is at -2.

The ordered pair would be (0,-2)

You want to end up with [tex]A\sin(\omega t+\phi)[/tex]. Expand this using the angle sum identity for sine:

[tex]A\sin(\omega t+\phi)=A\sin(\omega t)\cos\phi+A\cos(\omega t)\sin\phi[/tex]

We want this to line up with [tex]2\sin(4\pi t)+5\cos(4\pi t)[/tex]. Right away, we know [tex]\omega=4\pi[/tex].

We also need to have

[tex]\begin{cases}A\cos\phi=2\\A\sin\phi=5\end{cases}[/tex]

Recall that [tex]\sin^2x+\cos^2x=1[/tex] for all [tex]x[/tex]; this means

[tex](A\cos\phi)^2+(A\sin\phi)^2=2^2+5^2\implies A^2=29\implies A=\sqrt{29}[/tex]

Then

[tex]\begin{cases}\cos\phi=\frac2{\sqrt{29}}\\\sin\phi=\frac5{\sqrt{29}}\end{cases}\implies\tan\phi=\dfrac{\sin\phi}{\cos\phi}=\dfrac52\implies\phi=\tan^{-1}\left(\dfrac52\right)[/tex]

So we end up with

[tex]2\sin(4\pi t)+5\cos(4\pi t)=\sqrt{29}\sin\left(4\pi t+\tan^{-1}\left(\dfrac52\right)\right)[/tex]

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

In the form ...

  y(t) = Asin(ωt +φ)

you have ...

The translation from ...

  y(t) = 2sin(4πt) +5cos(4πt)

is ...

  A = √(2² +5²) = √29 . . . . the amplitude

  ω = 4π . . . . the angular frequency in radians per second

  φ = arctan(5/2) ≈ 1.1903 . . . . radians phase shift

Then, ...

  y(t) = √29·sin(4πt +1.1903)

_____

Comment on the conversion

You will notice we used "2" and "5" to find the amplitude and phase shift. In the generic case, these are "coefficient of sin( )" and "coefficient of cos( )". When determining phase shift, pay attention to whether your calculator is giving you degrees or radians. (Set the mode to what you want.)

If you have a negative coefficient for sin( ), you will need to add 180° (π radians) to the phase shift value given by the arctan( ) function.

Answer: Price-earnings ratio= 22.0

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: A company had a market price of $38.50 per share, earnings per share of $1.75, and dividends per share of $0.90

To find: price-earnings ratio

Required formula: [tex]\text{price-earnings ratio }=\dfrac{\text{ Market Price per Share}}{\text{Earnings Per Share}}[/tex]

Then, Price-earnings ratio = [tex]\dfrac{\$38.50}{\$1.75}[/tex]

⇒Price-earnings ratio = [tex]\dfrac{22}{1}[/tex]

Hence, the price-earnings ratio= 22.0

Answer:

0.0668 or 6.68%

Step-by-step explanation:

Variance (V) = 10,000

Standard deviation (σ) = √V= 100

Mean score (μ) = 500

The z-score for any test score X is:

[tex]z=\frac{X-\mu}{\sigma}[/tex]

For X = 650:

[tex]z=\frac{650-500}{100}\\z=1.5[/tex]

A z-score of 1.5 is equivalent to the 93.32nd percentile of a normal distribution. Therefore, the probability that he or she will make a score of 650 or more is:

[tex]P(X\geq 650)=1-P(X\leq 650)\\P(X\geq 650)=1-0.9332\\P(X\geq 650)=0.0668=6.68\%[/tex]

The probability is 0.0668 or 6.68%

The probability that he or she will make a score of 650 or more is 0.0668.

Let X = Scores made on a certain aptitude test by nursing students

X follows normal distribution with mean = 500 and variance of 10,000.

So, standard deviation = [tex]\sqrt{10000}=100[/tex].

z score of 650 is = [tex]\frac{\left(650-500\right)}{100}=1.5[/tex].

The probability that he or she will make a score of 650 or more is:

[tex]P(X\geq 650)\\=P(z\geq 1.5)\\=1-P(z<1.5)\\=1-0.9332\\=0.0668[/tex]

Learn more: https://brainly.com/question/14109853

Answer:

(a) The probability of getting someone who was not sent to prison is 0.55.

(b) If a study subject is randomly selected and it is then found that the subject entered a guilty plea, the probability that this person was not sent to prison is 0.63.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that in a study of pleas and prison sentences, it is found that 45% of the subjects studied were sent to prison. Among those sent to prison, 40% chose to plead guilty. Among those not sent to prison, 55% chose to plead guilty.

Let the probability that subjects studied were sent to prison = P(A) = 0.45

Let G = event that subject chose to plead guilty

So, the probability that the subjects chose to plead guilty given that they were sent to prison = P(G/A) = 0.40

and the probability that the subjects chose to plead guilty given that they were not sent to prison = P(G/A') = 0.55

(a) The probability of getting someone who was not sent to prison = 1 - Probability of getting someone who was sent to prison

      P(A') = 1 - P(A)

               = 1 - 0.45 = 0.55

(b) If a study subject is randomly selected and it is then found that the subject entered a guilty plea, the probability that this person was not sent to prison is given by = P(A'/G)

We will use Bayes' Theorem here to calculate the above probability;

    P(A'/G) =  [tex]\frac{P(A') \times P(G/A')}{P(A') \times P(G/A') +P(A) \times P(G/A)}[/tex]      

                 =  [tex]\frac{0.55 \times 0.55}{0.55\times 0.55 +0.45 \times 0.40}[/tex]

                 =  [tex]\frac{0.3025}{0.4825}[/tex]

                 =  0.63

Answer: The length of the line B'C" is 1 unit.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given: Triangle ABC is dilated by a scale factor of 0.5 with the origin as the center of dilation , resulting in the image Triangle A'B'C'.

If A (2,2), B= (4,3) and C=(6,3).

Distance between (a,b) and (c,d): [tex]D=\sqrt{(d-b)^2+(c-b)^2}[/tex]

Then, BC [tex]=\sqrt{(3-3)^2+(6-4)^2}[/tex]

[tex]\\\\=\sqrt{0+2^2}\\\\=\sqrt{4}\\\\=2\text{ units}[/tex]

Length of image = scale factor x length in original figure

B'C' = 0.5 × BC

= 0.5 × 2

= 1 unit

Hence, the length of the line B'C" is 1 unit.

Answer:

i think (d) one i think it will help you

Answer: C. 3.68

Step-by-step explanation:

Given that;

Sample size n = 18

degree of freedom for numerator k = 2

degree of freedom for denominator = n - k - 1 = (18-2-1) = 15

level of significance = 5% = 5/100 = 0.05

From the table values,

the critical value of F at 0.05 significance level with (2, 18) degrees of freedom is 3.68

Therefore option C. 3.68 is the correct answer

Answer:

the probability that the company's total hospital costs in a year are less than 50,000  = 0.7828

Step-by-step explanation:

From the given information:

the probability that the company's total hospital costs in a year are less than 50,000 will be the sum of the probability of the employees admitted.

If anyone is admitted to the hospital, they have [tex]\dfrac{1}{3}[/tex] probability of making at least one more visit, and a [tex]\dfrac{2}{3}[/tex]  probability  that this is their last visit.

If zero employee was admitted ;

Then:

Probability = (0.80)⁵

Probability = 0.3277

If one employee is admitted once;

Probability = [tex](0.80)^4 \times (0.20)^1 \times (^5_1) \times (\dfrac{2}{3})[/tex]

Probability = [tex](0.80)^4 \times (0.20)^1 \times (\dfrac{5!}{(5-1)!}) \times (\dfrac{2}{3})[/tex]

Probability = 0.2731

If one employee is admitted twice

Probability = [tex](0.80)^3 \times (0.20)^2 \times (^5_2) \times (\dfrac{2}{3})^2[/tex]

Probability = [tex](0.80)^3 \times (0.20)^2 \times (\dfrac{5!}{(5-2)!}) \times (\dfrac{2}{3})^2[/tex]

Probability = 0.1820

If two employees are admitted once

Probability = [tex](0.80)^4\times (0.20)^1 \times (^5_1) \times (\dfrac{1}{3}) \times (\dfrac{2}{3})[/tex]

Probability = [tex](0.80)^4 \times (0.20)^1 \times (\dfrac{5!}{(5-1)!}) \times (\dfrac{1}{3}) \times (\dfrac{2}{3})[/tex]

Probability = 0.0910

∴

the probability that the company's total hospital costs in a year are less than 50,000  = 0.3277 + 0.2731 + 0.1820

the probability that the company's total hospital costs in a year are less than 50,000  = 0.7828

Answer:

D.

m = 2 = figures/month

b = 20 = # of action figures

Answer:

Hope this is correct

HAVE A GOOD DAY!

Answer:

Step-by-step explanation:

The perimeter of a rectangle is expressed as 2(L+B) where;

L is the length and B is the breadth of the triangle.

P = 2(L+B)

68 = 2(L+B)

L+B = 68/2

L+B = 34

L = 34 - B ... 1

Area of the rectangle A = LB... 2

Substituting equation 1 into 2 will give;

A = (34-B)B

A = 34B-B²

To maximize the area of the triangle, dA/dB must be equal to zero i.e

dA/dB = 0

dA/dB = 34 - 2B = 0

34-2B = 0

2B = 34

Dividing both sides of the equation by 2 we will have;

B = 34/2

B = 17

Substituting B = 17 into equation 1 to get the length L

L = 34-17

L = 17m

This shows that the rectangle with maximum area is a square since L = B = 17m

The dimension of the rectangle is Length = 17m and Breadth = 17m

The dimensions are 17m and 17m.

The perimeter of a rectangle is given as:

= 2(length + width)

Since in their case, the lengths have same values, this will be:

Perimeter = 2(l + l)

Perimeter = 4l

4l = 68

L = 68/4

L = 17m

Therefore, the dimensions are 17m and 17m.

Read related link on:

https://brainly.com/question/15366172

Answer:

The probability that no more than 70% would prefer to start their own business is 0.1423.

Step-by-step explanation:

We are given that a Gallup survey indicated that 72% of 18- to 29-year-olds, if given choice, would prefer to start their own business rather than work for someone else.

Let [tex]\hat p[/tex] = sample proportion of people who prefer to start their own business

The z-score probability distribution for the sample proportion is given by;

                               Z  =  [tex]\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex]  ~ N(0,1)

where, p = population proportion who would prefer to start their own business = 72%

            n = sample of 18-29 year-olds = 600

Now, the probability that no more than 70% would prefer to start their own business is given by = P( [tex]\hat p[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] 70%)

       P( [tex]\hat p[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] 70%) = P( [tex]\frac{\hat p-p}{\sqrt{\frac{\hat p(1-\hat p)}{n} } }[/tex] [tex]\leq[/tex] [tex]\frac{0.70-0.72}{\sqrt{\frac{0.70(1-0.70)}{600} } }[/tex] ) = P(Z [tex]\leq[/tex] -1.07) = 1 - P(Z < 1.07)

                                                                       = 1 - 0.8577 = 0.1423

The above probability is calculated by looking at the value of x = 1.07 in the z table which has an area of 0.8577.

Answer:

33800

Step-by-step explanation:

100 x 338 = 33800

Answer:

33800

Step-by-step explanation:

338x10=3380 then 3380x10=33800

-------------------------------------------------------

Good luck with your assignment...

Answer:

It is unlikely.

Step-by-step explanation:

Certain = 100%

Impossible = 0%

Likely = more than 50%

Unlikely = less than 50%

It is less than 50%, so it is unlikely.

Answer:

(A) it is likely

Step-by-step explanation:

i took the test on edge

Complete Question

If w'(t) is the rate of growth of a child in pounds per year, what does

[tex]\int\limits^{7}_{4} {w'(t)} \, dt[/tex]  represent?

a) The change in the child's weight (in pounds) between the ages of 4 and 7.

b) The change in the child's age (in years) between the ages of 4 and 7.

c) The child's weight at age 7.

d) The child's weight at age 4. The child's initial weight at birth.

Answer:

The correct option is  option a

Step-by-step explanation:

From the question we are told that

       [tex]w'(t)[/tex] represents the rate of growth of a child in   [tex]\frac{pounds}{year}[/tex]

So      [tex]{w'(t)} \, dt[/tex]  will be in  [tex]pounds[/tex]

Which then mean that this  [tex]\int\limits^{7}_{4} {w'(t)} \, dt[/tex]  the change in the weight of the child between the ages of  [tex]4 \to 7[/tex] years