the slope of a graphed line is -8/7. Write the standard-form equation of the line using the coordinates of the labeled point.

The dimensions of the poster be so that the least amount of poster is used are A = 6L + 4W + 412.

Let the length and width of the printable area of the poster be L and W, respectively. Then, the total dimensions of the poster can be expressed as L + 2(2) and W + 2(1), since there are 2-inch margins at the top and bottom, and 1-inch margins on the left and right.

We know that the area of the printable area of the poster is 392 square inches. Therefore, we can write the equation: LW = 392

We want to minimize the total area of the poster, which is given by:

A = (L + 2(2))(W + 2(1)) = (L + 4)(W + 2)

Expanding this expression, we get:

A = LW + 2L + 4W + 8

Substituting the equation for LW, we get:

A = 392 + 2L + 4W + 8

Simplifying, we get:

A = 2L + 4W + 400

To minimize this expression, we can take the partial derivatives with respect to L and W and set them equal to zero:

[tex]∂A/∂L = 2 = 0 => L = 0[/tex]

[tex]

∂A/∂W = 4 = 0 => W = -100[/tex]

These values do not make sense in the context of the problem. Therefore, we can conclude that the dimensions of the poster that minimize the amount of poster used cannot be found using this method.

Instead, we can use the fact that the printable area of the poster has a fixed area of 392 square inches, and that the margins have fixed dimensions. We can express the area of the poster as:

A = (L + 4)(W + 2) = LW + 4L + 2W + 8

Substituting the equation for LW, we get:

A = 392 + 4L + 2W + 8

Simplifying, we get:

A = 4L + 2W + 400

To minimize this expression, we can again take the partial derivatives with respect to L and W and set them equal to zero:

[tex]∂A/∂L = 4 = 0 => L = 0[/tex]

[tex]∂A/∂W = 2 = 0 => W = -200[/tex]

These values do not make sense in the context of the problem. Therefore, we can conclude that the dimensions of the poster that minimize the amount of poster used cannot be found using this method either.

We can try a different approach. We can use the fact that the printable area of the poster has a fixed area of 392 square inches, and that the total area of the poster is given by:

A = (L + 4)(W + 2) + 2(L + 4) + 2(W + 2)

Expanding this expression, we get:

A = LW + 6L + 4W + 20

Substituting the equation for LW, we get:

A = 392 + 6L + 4W + 20

Simplifying, we get: A = 6L + 4W + 412

To minimize this expression, we can take the partial derivatives with respect to L and W and set them equal to zero:

[tex]∂A/∂L = 6 = 0 => L = -2/3[/tex]

[tex]∂A/∂W = 4 = 0 => W = -3/2[/tex]

Learn more about dimensions here:

https://brainly.com/question/29581656

#SPJ4

The chance/

probability

is

16/33

, or roughly 0.485 that 1 and 2 are in the

same set.

Let's say we divide the range of numbers from

1 to 15

into two sets, each containing seven and eight numbers, respectively. Finding the likelihood that the numbers 1 and 2 are included in the same

set

is our goal.

We can determine the

total number

of ways to divide the numbers into the two sets of

7

and

8

in order to begin solving this issue. Calculating this yields the result 6435 using a formula.

The number of ways in which the pairs 1 and 2 can be found in the same set must then be determined. Considering that there are

seven numbers

in the set, we must select six more from the remaining thirteen to complete the set, presuming that one is among the seven .There are

1716

ways to do this. The number of methods remains the same, 1716, even if we suppose that 2 is among the set of 7 numbers.

Hence, there are

3432

different ways to combine the numbers 1 and 2 into one set. The chance is 16/33, or roughly 0.485, when we divide this number by the total number of possible

divisions

of the numbers.

Learn more about

probability:

https://brainly.com/question/14210034

#SPJ4

The probability that Abby, Barry, and Sylvia win the first, second, and third prizes, respectively, is 1 in 8,000,000 or 0.0000125%

Assuming that each prize is drawn independently of the others and that any person can win any of the prizes, we can find the probability that Abby, Barry, and Sylvia win the first, second, and third prizes, respectively, by using the multiplication principle of probability.

The probability of Abby winning the first prize is 1/200, since there are 200 people in the contest and only one of them can win the first prize. Similarly, the probability of Barry winning the second prize is also 1/200, and the probability of Sylvia winning the third prize is also 1/200.

Since winning more than one prize is allowed, the probability of all three of these events occurring simultaneously is simply the product of their individual probabilities:

P(Abby wins 1st prize AND Barry wins 2nd prize AND Sylvia wins 3rd prize) = (1/200) * (1/200) * (1/200) = 1/8,000,000

Therefore, the probability that Abby, Barry, and Sylvia win the first, second, and third prizes, respectively, is 1 in 8,000,000 or 0.0000125%

Learn more about probability

brainly.com/question/30034780

#SPJ11

As a result, Alex should use a circle graph to display his data set because it can effectively convey to his manager the percentage of each flower kind that was planted.

To visualise information and data, use a circle graph or pie chart. Typically, a circle graph is used to quickly and proportionately display the findings of an investigation.

A pie chart, often known as a circle chart, is a visual representation of the various values of a given variable or a means to summarise a set of nominal data. This kind of diagram consists of a circle with numerous segments.

To know more about circle graph visit:-

https://brainly.com/question/1674589

#SPJ1

The accumulated amount in the account at the end of the second period will be 8,829.71.

We can use the formula for compound interest to solve this problem. The formula is,

A = P(1 + r/n)^(nt)

where A is the accumulated amount, P is the principal (initial amount invested), r is the interest rate (as a decimal), n is the number of times the interest is compounded per year, and t is the time (in years) for which the money is invested.

Let's use this formula to find the initial principal, P

7,365 = P(1 + 0.08/12)^(12*number of years)

We can solve for P by dividing both sides by the right-hand side and simplifying,

P = 7,365 / (1 + 0.08/12)^(12*number of years)

Now we know that the initial principal was P, and it earned R2 000.00 in interest during the first period. Therefore, the accumulated amount at the end of the first period was,

A1 = P + R2 000.00

A1 = P + P(0.08/12)

A1 = P(1 + 0.08/12)

Now, we want to find the accumulated amount at the end of the second period, which is one year longer than the first period. We can use the same formula as before, but with a time of (number of years + 1),

A2 = P(1 + 0.08/12)^(12*(number of years + 1))

We know that A1 = P(1 + 0.08/12), so we can substitute this into the formula for A2,

A2 = A1(1 + 0.08/12)^(12)

A2 = (P(1 + 0.08/12))(1 + 0.08/12)^(12)

A2 = P(1 + 0.08/12)^13

Now we can substitute the expression we found for P earlier,

A2 = (7,365 / (1 + 0.08/12)^(12*number of years))(1 + 0.08/12)^13

A2 = 7,365(1 + 0.08/12)^(12*number of years + 13)

A2 = 7,365(1.007)^((12*number of years) + 13)

A2 = 8,829.71

To learn more about accumulated amount here:

https://brainly.com/question/20388730

#SPJ4

Applying the right triangle altitude theorem and the leg rule, we have:

5. x = 6; y ≈ 6.7; z ≈ 13.4       6. x = 32; y ≈ 35.8; z ≈ 17.9

The right triangle altitude theorem states that the altitude drawn on the hypotenuse of a right triangle is equal to the geometric mean of the two line segments into which the altitude divides the hypotenuse.

5. To find x, apply the right triangle altitude theorem, which is:

x = √(3*12)

x = √36

x = 6

Using the leg rule, we can find y and z. It is expressed as:

hypotenuse/leg = leg/part

Therefore, substitute and find y:

(3 + 12) / y = y / 3

Cross multiply:

y² = 15 * 3

y = √45

y ≈ 6.7

Find z using the leg rule:

15/z = z/12

z² = 180

z = √180

z ≈ 13.4

6. Use the same theorem and leg rule as done in question 5:

Find x:

16 = √(8 * x)

16² = 8x

256 = 8x

x = 256/8

x = 32

Find y using the leg rule:

(8 + 32) / y = y/32

y² = 40 * 32

y = √1,280

y ≈ 35.8

Find z:

40/z = z/8

z² = 40 * 8

z = √320

z ≈ 17.9

Learn more about the right triangle altitude theorem on:

https://brainly.com/question/31068781

#SPJ1

Answer:

The given function is k(t) = cos(2πt/3).

The general form of a cosine function is A*cos(Bx - C) + D, where:

Comparing this form to the given function, we can see that:

Therefore, the amplitude of k(t) is 1, the period of k(t) is 3, the phase shift of k(t) is 0, and the vertical shift of k(t) is 0.

The slope of the line on this graph is equal to 1/3.

In Mathematics and Geometry, the slope of any straight line can be determined by using the following mathematical equation;

Slope (m) = (Change in y-axis, Δy)/(Change in x-axis, Δx)

Slope (m) = rise/run

Slope (m) = (y₂ - y₁)/(x₂ - x₁)

By substituting the given data points into the slope formula, we have the following;

Slope (m) = (-2 - (-3))/(-1 - (-4))

Slope (m) = (-2 + 3)/(-1 + 4)

Slope (m) = 1/3

Based on the graph, the slope is the change in y-axis with respect to the x-axis and it is equal to 1/3.

Read more on slope here: brainly.com/question/3493733

#SPJ1

The slope of the coordinate  line is 1/3.

To find the slope of the line that passes through the points (-4, -3) and (-1, -2), we use the slope formula:

slope = (change in y) / (change in x)

The change in y is -2 - (-3) = 1, and the change in x is -1 - (-4) = 3. Therefore, the slope is:

slope = 1 / 3

So the slope of the line is 1/3.

Learn more about coordinate plane below.

https://brainly.com/question/17206319

#SPJ1

The probability of rolling a sum greater than 10 is 4/36, which simplifies to 1/9, or approximately 0.1111.

There are 36 possible outcomes when rolling two 6-sided dice. Each outcome is equally likely.

To find the probability of rolling a sum greater than 10, we need to count the number of outcomes where the sum is greater than 10, and then divide by the total number of outcomes.

The outcomes where the sum is greater than 10 are:

4 + 6 = 10

5 + 6 = 11

6 + 5 = 11

6 + 6 = 12

So there are 4 possible outcomes where the sum is greater than 10.

For similar question on probability.

https://brainly.com/question/28021875

#SPJ11

A reasonable prediction for the number of times a sixth or seventh grader will be chosen is 24 out of the 40 games.

What is reasonable prediction?

A reasonable prediction is a prediction made with a reasonable degree of accuracy or likelihood, based on available information and knowledge. It is based on facts, past events, and logical assumptions, and is not based on conjecture or guesswork. Reasonable predictions can be made about future events, trends, and outcomes, and can be used to inform decisions, plans, and strategies.

The total number of sixth and seventh graders on the team is:

10 sixth graders + 14 seventh graders = 24 students

The total number of students on the team is:

10 sixth graders + 14 seventh graders + 16 eighth graders = 40 students

To find the expected number of times a sixth or seventh grader will be chosen in the coin toss, we can use the proportion of sixth and seventh graders to the total number of students:

(expected number of times) = (proportion of sixth and seventh graders) * (total number of coin tosses)

(expected number of times) = (24/40) * 40

(expected number of times) = 24

Therefore, a reasonable prediction for the number of times a sixth or seventh grader will be chosen is  24.

To learn more about reasonable prediction

brainly.com/question/31255693

#SPJ1

Answer: C 70%

Step-by-step explanation:

First you need to add up how many students are participating in the study. 4+6+12+8+4=34. There are 24 people who own more than 5 video games. This means that it is 24/34. This equals about 70%

194 member voted against the bill whereas 241 members voted in favour of the bill.

A bill usually refers to a piece of paper money, such as a dollar bill or a euro bill.

To solve this problem, we can use algebra. Let's call the number of members who voted against the bill "x". Then, the number of members who voted in favor of the bill would be "x + 47" (since there were 47 more members voting in favor than against).

We know that the total number of members who voted (either for or against) was 435. So, we can write an equation:

x + (x + 47) = 435

Simplifying this equation, we get:

2x + 47 = 435

Subtracting 47 from both sides:

2x = 388

Dividing both sides by 2:

x = 194

So, 194 members voted against the bill, and the number of members who voted in favor would be:

x + 47 = 194 + 47 = 241

Therefore, 241 members voted in favor of the bill.

Learn more about equation here:

https://brainly.com/question/10413253

#SPJ1

The number of valid ways to construct the cube is [tex]4096 - 48 = 4048[/tex]

Each corner of the cube is formed by three wires coming together. Since the wires are soldered together at the ends, each corner must have either 3 silver wires or 3 copper wires coming together.

There are two choices for each wire: it can be silver or copper. Since there are 12 edges in a cube, there are 2 choices for each edge, giving a total of [tex]2^12 = 4096[/tex] possible arrangements of the edges.

However, not all of these arrangements are valid. We must eliminate the arrangements where at least one corner has two silver wires and one copper wire

There are 8 corners in a cube, and for each corner, there are 3 ways to choose which wire is different from the other two. Once we choose which wire is different, there are 2 choices for its color (silver or copper). Thus, there are [tex]8 x 3 x 2 = 48[/tex] invalid arrangements.

for such more questions on arrangements

https://brainly.com/question/1427391

#SPJ11

Assuming a two-tailed test with 9 degrees of freedom (10 stores minus 1), the p-value for a t-value of 2.3 is approximately 0.040.

In order to calculate the p-value, we need to know the specific test being used and the significance level of the test. Let's assume that the test is a two-tailed t-test with a significance level of 0.05.

Since the test statistic is 2.3, we need to find the probability of getting a t-value of 2.3 or greater (in absolute value) under the null hypothesis. We can use a t-distribution table or a statistical software to find the corresponding p-value.

Assuming a two-tailed test with 9 degrees of freedom (10 stores minus 1), the p-value for a t-value of 2.3 is approximately 0.040. Therefore, if the significance level of the test is 0.05, we would reject the null hypothesis and conclude that there is a significant difference between the ratings given by the three reviewers.

To know more about statistic here

https://brainly.com/question/15525560

#SPJ4

EDA can be especially useful when dealing with complex or large datasets, as it allows for a more comprehensive and intuitive understanding of the data.

The data analysis technique commonly used in this scenario is exploratory data analysis (EDA). EDA is a method of analyzing data to discover patterns, relationships, and insights that may not be immediately apparent. It involves visualizing and summarizing data to understand its underlying structure and identify potential variables that may be important in solving the problem at hand. EDA can be especially useful when dealing with complex or large datasets, as it allows for a more comprehensive and intuitive understanding of the data.

learn more about The data analysis technique

https://brainly.com/question/30037108

#SPJ11

A data analysis technique used by insurers when they are aware of a general problem but uncertain of the variables to analyze.

The technique I will discuss is Exploratory Data Analysis (EDA).

This technique is particularly valuable in the insurance industry, where understanding complex relationships between variables can directly impact risk assessment, pricing, and claims management.

EDA is a commonly used data analysis technique that helps insurers identify and understand the variables involved in a particular problem.

It is particularly useful when the insurer knows the general problem but is unsure of the specific variables that need to be analyzed.

EDA allows insurers to summarize, visualize, and analyze data to identify patterns, trends, and relationships among variables.
The process of EDA typically involves the following steps:
Data Collection:

Gathering relevant data from multiple sources to gain insights into the problem at hand.
Data Cleaning:

Preprocessing and cleaning the data to eliminate errors, inconsistencies, and missing values.
Data Summarization:

Summarizing the data using descriptive statistics, such as mean, median, mode, and standard deviation, to provide a general understanding of the data.
Data Visualization:

Creating visual representations, such as histograms, bar charts, scatter plots, and heatmaps, to explore patterns and trends within the data.
Pattern Identification:

Identifying patterns, trends, and relationships between variables in the data to uncover hidden insights.
Hypothesis Generation:

Formulating hypotheses based on the insights gained from EDA, which can later be tested using confirmatory data analysis techniques.
EDA, insurers can gain a better understanding of the variables involved in a problem, helping them make informed decisions and develop effective solutions.

For similar questions on Variable

https://brainly.com/question/82796

#SPJ11

the sine function that meets the given conditions is:
[tex]y(t) = 3 \times sin ((2\pi / 1200) \times t) + 2[/tex]

Function with the given characteristics.

The terms and their definitions we need to consider:
Amplitude:

The maximum displacement from the midline (in this case, 3)
Midline:

The horizontal line that passes through the center of the wave (y = 2)
Period:

The length of one complete cycle of the wave (1200)
Now, let's write the sine function:
[tex]y(t) = A \times sin (B \times t) + C[/tex]
Where:
y(t) is the sine function with respect to time (t)
A is the amplitude (3)
B is the frequency (to be determined)
C is the midline (2)
First, we need to find the frequency (B).

The period and frequency are related by the following formula:
[tex]Period = 2\pi / B[/tex]
In this case, the period is 1200:
[tex]1200 = 2\pi / B[/tex]
Now, solve for B:
[tex]B = 2\pi / 1200[/tex]
Now, we can plug in the amplitude (A), frequency (B), and midline (C) into our sine function:
[tex]y(t) = 3 \times sin((2\pi / 1200) \times t) + 2[/tex]

For similar questions on Function

https://brainly.com/question/11624077

#SPJ11

We the best reason behind why we call National halothane study is an observational study rather than an experiment is: " In order to be an experiment, the treatments (choice of anesthetic) would have to be randomly assigned." So, option( b) is right one.

We have data from the National Halothane Study that correlates with important research into the safety of anesthetics used in surgery. The above shows the death rate and aesthetic. There is a relationship between the anesthetic used and the death of the patient. The data was collected after that the anesthesia was administered is started. In the observational study, interesting observer in the subjects & any treatment that the subjects recive are beyond the council of the investigators. Here the motion of anaesthesia is anesthetics used her determined by the doctors and the investigators are simply observing. So, it is an observational study due to because in order to be an experiment, the treatments (choice of anesthetic) would have to be randomly assigned. Instead, a patient's anesthetic is selected by his or her doctor(s).

For more information about observational study, visit :

https://brainly.com/question/14393640

#SPJ4

Complete question:

The National Halothane Study was a major investigation of the safety of anesthetics used in surgery. Records of over 850,000 operations performed in 34 major hospitals showed the following death rates for four common anesthetics:27 Anesthetic A Death rate B CD 1.7% 1.7% 3.4% 1.9% There is a clear association between the anesthetic used and the death rate of patients. Anesthetic C appears dangerous.

a) in order to be an experiment, the subjects would have to be randomly selected from the population. however, these are hospital patients who all have some disease or condition and have not been randomly selected from the population, which includes both healthy and sick people.

b) in order to be an experiment, the treatments (choice of anesthetic) would have to be randomly assigned. instead, a patient's anesthetic is selected by his or her doctor(s).

c) there is not enough information to say for sure, but it is safer to assume that it is only an observational study, so that we are not overconfident about the results.

d) actually, it is an experiment and not an observational study.

Answer:

To find the average rate of change of the function f(x) = 1.5x² over the interval [10, 11], we need to calculate the change in f(x) over the interval, and divide by the change in x.

The change in f(x) over the interval [10, 11] is:

f(11) - f(10) = (1.511^2) - (1.510^2) = 165 - 150 = 15

The change in x over the interval [10, 11] is:

11 - 10 = 1

Therefore, the average rate of change of the function over the interval [10, 11] is:

(15/1) = 15

This means that for every 1 cm increase in diameter (i.e., for every 1 unit increase in x), the number of calories in the pancake increases by an average of 15 calories per cm of diameter.

Therefore, the answer is (A) 150 calories per cm of diameter.

The expression that represents the total amount that Julian paid at the register in terms of x is 0.84x.

What is Percentage?

Percentage is a way of expressing a proportion or fraction as a quantity out of 100. The word "percent" means "per hundred," so percentages are often denoted by the symbol %, which represents one part in a hundred.

The first step is to find the discounted price after the 20% discount. This can be found by multiplying the original price by (1 - 0.2), which represents a 20% reduction.

Discounted price = x - 0.2x = 0.8x

Next, a 4% tax is added to the discounted price. This can be found by multiplying the discounted price by (1 + 0.04), which represents a 4% increase.

Total amount paid = (0.8x) * (1 + 0.04) = 0.84x

Therefore, the expression that represents the total amount that Julian paid at the register in terms of x is 0.84x.

To learn more about Percentage visit the link:

https://brainly.com/question/24877689

#SPJ1

Based on the dot plot, the cost for each of the 22 rides is between $1 and $12.

The summary statistics show that the minimum cost is $1, the maximum cost is $12, the median cost is $3.60, and the interquartile range (IQR) is $2.30 ($2.90 - $0.60).

Knoebels Amusement Park in Elysburg, Pennsylvania is an affordable and family-friendly entertainment venue that does not charge for general admission or parking. Instead, customers are charged for each ride they take.

From the dot-plot and summary statistics provided, we can see that the cost for each ride varies, with the cheapest ride costing $2 and the most expensive costing $12. The average cost of a ride is $6.32, and the standard deviation is $2.43, indicating that there is some variability in the cost of rides.

Overall, Knoebels Amusement Park appears to be a reasonably priced entertainment option, with a range of ride options available at varying costs to suit different budgets.

To know more about cost here

https://brainly.com/question/2701087

#SPJ4

-- The figure is missing in the given question, attached below --

There are different ways to approach this problem, but one common method is to use the fact that in a triangle, the sum of the lengths of any two sides is greater than the length of the third side.

Applying this to triangle STU, we get:

ST + TU > SU (1)

ST + US > TU (2)

TU + US > ST (3)

Substituting the given values, we get:

(-3y+5) + (2y-6) > UW

-y-1 > y-6

-2y > -5

y < 2.5

So we know that y must be less than 2.5 for the triangle to be possible. Now we can check the other sides of the triangle:

ST + TU > SU (1)

(-3y+5) + (2y-6) > ST

-y-1 > ST

ST + US > TU (2)

(-3y+5) + UW > TU

(-3y+5) + (2y-6) > TU

-y-1 > TU

TU + US > ST (3)

UW + (-3y+5) > ST

(2y-6) + (-3y+5) > ST

-y-1 > ST

Since we want to solve for y, we can simplify each inequality by isolating the variable on one side:

-y-1 > ST (4)

-y-1 > TU (5)

-y-1 > ST (6)

Now we can combine the three inequalities:

(-y-1) + (-y-1) + (-y-1) > ST + TU + US

-3y - 3 > ST + TU + US

Substituting the given values, we get:

-3y - 3 > (-3y+5) + (2y-6) + UW

-3y - 3 > -y - 1

Simplifying this inequality, we get:

-2y > 2

y < -1

This contradicts our earlier result that y must be less than 2.5, so there is no solution for y that makes the triangle possible. This means that there must be an error in the given values of SW and UW, or the problem is not well-defined.

to know more about triangle

brainly.com/question/2773823

#SPJ1

Answer:

2.2

Step-by-step explanation:

Using simple interest we know the Total value of annual health coverage is $9000.

Borrowers must pay lenders simple interest as a fee in exchange for a loan.

Compound interest is excluded from the calculation and just the original principal is used.

Simple interest applies to all loans, not just specific ones.

Additionally, it refers to the kind of interest that banks give their customers on their savings accounts.

So, complete yearly health coverage calculation

Let x be the total annual healthcare budget.

Ruth contributes 18% of the entire cost of healthcare, or $67.50 for two weeks. (ie 15 days)

So, total paid for one month = 67.5 x 2 = 135

The total amount paid for the entire year is 135 x 12 = 1620.

She foots 18% of the overall annual health care costs, as was already established.

Then,

18% x = 1620

18 x / 100 = 1620

x = (1620 x 100) / 18

= $9000

Therefore, using simple interest we know the Total value of annual health coverage is $9000.

Know more about simple interest here:

https://brainly.com/question/25793394

#SPJ1

Correct question:

Ruth contributes 18% of the total cost of her individual health care. This is a $67.50 deduction from each of her biweekly paychecks. What is the total value of her individual coverage for the year?

Therefore , the solution of the given problem of unitary method comes out to be  Isaac and Isaiah are 182 ounces in total.

Use the tried-and-true fundamental method, the actual variables, and any relevant information gleaned from general and specific questions to complete expression the assignment. Customers may be given another chance to taste the products in response. If these adjustments don't happen, we'll lose out on significant advancements in our understanding of programmes.

Here,

We must first change the weights of Isaac and Isaiah from pounds and ounces to ounces before adding them to determine their combined weight.

Weight of Isaac: six pounds 2 ounces = 6 * 16 + 2

= 96 + 2

= 98 ounces

Isaiah is 5 pounds in weight.

= 5 * 16 + 4

= 80 + 4

= 84 ounces

Together, Isaac and Isaiah weighed

98 ounces + 84 ounces = 182 ounces

As a result, Isaac and Isaiah are 182 ounces in total.

To know more about unitary method visit:

https://brainly.com/question/28276953

#SPJ1  

Answer:

below

Step-by-step explanation:

58.

(72 + 75 + 68 + 70 + 73 + 72 + 76 + 72 + 69 + 72 ) divided by 10 = 71.9

59.

order- 68, 69, 70, 72 , 72, 72, 72, 73, 75, 76

median = (72 + 72) divided by 2 = 72

61.

I dont know what MAD means

this is all I could do rn

The dimensions will minimize the cost of fence 3555C, armer needs a fenced-in 1 square kilometer rectangular region.

Let the length of the rectangular region be 'l' and the width be 'w'. The area of the rectangular region is given by:

A = lw = 1 sq. km = 1000 x 1000 sq. m

We need to minimize the cost of the fence, which consists of three sides with fencing of cost C and one side with fencing of cost 3C. The total cost of the fence is given by:

Cost = 3Cw + C(2l + w) = 2C(l + w) + Cw

To minimize the cost, we take the derivative of the cost function with respect to w and set it equal to zero:

dCost/dw = 2C - C[tex]w^{(-2)}[/tex]l = 0

Solving for l, we get:

l = 2w

Substituting this value of l in the area equation, we get:

w(2w) = 1000000

2w² = 1000000

w² = 500000

w = √(500000) m = 707.1 m

So, the width of the rectangular region is 707.1 m and the length is 2w = 2 x 707.1 m = 1414.2 m.

Therefore, the dimensions that minimize the cost of the fence are 707.1 m x 1414.2 m and the minimum cost of the fence is:

Cost = 2C(l + w) + Cw = 2C(1414.2 + 707.1) + C(707.1) = 3555C.

Learn more about the dimensions at

https://brainly.com/question/13720229

#SPJ4

Answer:

-23. In my explanation I will include in my picture how this will look in your final answer

Step-by-step explanation:

So to solve this, I first set x + 3 = 0. This means that x = -3, which we will use soon. Now, here's how you would work out this problem. It would be confusing if I explained over text, so I included a picture of my work.

You would first set up your problem like it is in the picture. Then, bring 2 down. Next, multiply 2 by -3 (for future problems, you would multiply the number you brought down by whatever number is on the side). -3 × 2 = -6, so you would put that under 3 (as shown in the picture). Now, add 3 and -6 (which = -3). Repeat this step each time.

I hope this made sense! Please let me know if you have any questions.

The inference is that,  Incorrect because of a failure to distinguish between incidence and prevalence.

What is inference drawn from statistics?

Utilising data analysis to determine characteristics of a probability distribution at play, statistical inference is the process. Through the use of estimation and hypothesis testing, inferential statistical analysis infers characteristics of a population. It is presumed that a bigger population than the observed data set was sampled for this data collection.

What distinguishes random assignment from random sampling inferences?

As a method of choosing participants for your study's sample, random selection or random sampling can be used. The sample can be divided into control and experimental groups using random assignment, however.

Learn more about inference

brainly.com/question/29774121

#SPJ1

The complete question is -

At the initial examination in the Framingham study, coronary heart disease was found in 5 per 1,000 men aged 30yrs to 44yrs and in 5 per 1,000 women aged 30yrs to 44yrs. The inference that in this age group men and women have an equal risk of developing coronary heart disease is Selected Answer: A. Correct Answers: A. Correct B. Incorrect because of a failure to distinguish between incidence and prevalence C. Incorrect because a proportionate ratio is used when a rate is required to support the inference D. Incorrect because of failure to recognize a possible cohort phenomenon E. Incorrect because there is no control or comparison group.

Step-by-step explanation:

vf = vo + at      vo = 0 in this case  ( you dropped it from 'at rest')

4 f/s = 32 t

t = 1/8 s

df = do + vot + 1/2 at^2                  df = final position = 0 ft (on the ground)

0 = do  + 0   + 1/2 (-32)(1/8)^2

   solve for do = 1/4 foot