Throughout the year, Supreme Court justices review cases that have been appealed to the Court. When a session begins, the justices select a handful of cases to more fully review and decide. For each selected case, lawyers for both parties are allowed to make public arguments in an attempt to sway the justices and address their questions. The justices then deliberate and argue the facts of the case. They produce opinions, which can include majority, dissenting, and concurring opinions. The justices vote on which opinion they support, and the opinion with the most votes becomes the final verdict.

Which statement best summarizes the inaccuracy contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision-making process?

A. The Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it.
B. Justices do not vote on particular opinions, but rather on the final ruling.
C. Lawyers are not allowed to attempt to influence the justice's opinions in any way.
D. Only appellate court judges are charged with writing dissenting opinions.

The statement that best summarizes the inaccuracies contained in this description of the Supreme Court's decision-making process is that the Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it. Hence, Option A is correct.

The court, which is the highest court in the United States, is the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court has ultimate appellate jurisdiction over all U.S. federal court cases and the cases that are over state courts are looked after by the Supreme Court.

Any opinion, whether it is of the majority, dissenting or the final court decision, is expressed after hearing arguments from both the parties. They constitute the ruling of the Supreme Court over the case.

According to the given paragraph The Supreme Court firstly reaches a decision and then hears the parts, which is wrong. It is the duty of the Supreme court to hear any case that is appealed to it.

Therefore, Option A: The Supreme Court is not allowed to decline to hear any case that is appealed to it is correct.

Learn more about Supreme court from here:

https://brainly.com/question/1755400

#SPJ2

A case comes before a Wisconsin state trial court on the subject of free speech on the Internet. It is a case of first impression, meaning that no case involving the same issue has been decided by the Wisconsin courts. In deciding such a case, it would not be considered proper for the judge to consider: